Describing the relationship between atrial fibrillation and frailty: Clinical implications and open research questions

Multidisciplinary Approach in Atrial Fibrillation: As Good as Gold

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common sustained arrhythmia necessitating dual focus: acute complication management and sustained longitudinal oversight to modulate disease progression and ensure comprehensive patient care over time. AF is a multifaceted disorder; due to such a great number of potential exacerbating conditions, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) should manage AF patients by cooperating with a cardiologist. Effective management of AF patients necessitates the implementation of a well-coordinated and tailored care pathway aimed at delivering optimized treatment through collaboration among various healthcare professionals. Management of AF should be carefully evaluated and mutually agreed upon in consultation with healthcare providers. It is crucial to recognize that treatment may evolve due to the emergence of new risk factors, symptoms, disease progression, and advancements in treatment modalities. In the context of multidisciplinary AF teams, a coordinated approach involves assembling a diverse team tailored to meet individual patients' unique needs based on local services' availability.

Hemorrhagic Coagulation Disorders and Ischemic Stroke: How to Reconcile Both?

Coagulation and fibrinolytic system disorders are conditions in which the blood's ability to clot is impaired, resulting in an increased risk of thrombosis or bleeding. Although these disorders are the expression of two opposing tendencies, they can often be associated with or be a consequence of each other, contributing to making the prognosis of acute cerebrovascular events more difficult. It is important to recognize those conditions that are characterized by dual alterations in the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems to reduce the prognostic impact of clinical conditions with difficult treatment and often unfortunate outcomes. Management of these individuals can be challenging, as clinicians must balance the need to prevent bleeding episodes with the potential risk of clot formation. Treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis, considering the specific bleeding disorder, its severity, and the patient's general medical condition. This review aims to deal with all those forms in which coagulation and fibrinolysis represent two sides of the same media in the correct management of patients with acute neurological syndrome. Precision medicine, personalized treatment, advanced anticoagulant strategies, and innovations in bleeding control represent future directions in the management of these complex pathologies in which stroke can be the evolution of two different acute events or be the first manifestation of an occult or unknown underlying pathology.

Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal

Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is one pillar of the management of this common arrhythmia. Substantial advances in the epidemiology and associated pathophysiology underlying AF-related stroke and thrombo-embolism are evident. Furthermore, the introduction of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (also called direct oral anticoagulants) has clearly changed our approach to stroke prevention in AF, such that the default should be to offer oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention, unless the patient is at low risk. A strategy of early rhythm control is also beneficial in reducing strokes in selected patients with recent onset AF, when compared to rate control. Cardiovascular risk factor management, with optimization of comorbidities and attention to lifestyle factors, and the patient's psychological morbidity are also essential. Finally, in selected patients with absolute contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion or exclusion may be considered. The aim of this state-of-the-art review article is to provide an overview of the current status of AF-related stroke and prevention strategies. A holistic or integrated care approach to AF management is recommended to minimize the risk of stroke in patients with AF, based on the evidence-based Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway, as follows: A: Avoid stroke with Anticoagulation; B: Better patient-centred, symptom-directed decisions on rate or rhythm control; C: Cardiovascular risk factor and comorbidity optimization, including lifestyle changes.

Prevalence and risk factors of frailty in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the prevalence and risk factors for frailty in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, and a search of the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was carried out to collect Chinese and English studies on frailty and COPD published up to September 5, 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 38 articles were included for the quantitative analysis after the collected literature was either included or omitted based on pertinent criteria. The results indicated that the estimated overall pooled prevalence of frailty was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31-41%), and the estimated pre-frailty was 43% (95% CI = 37-49%). A higher age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.06) and higher COPD assessment test (CAT) score (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.12-1.27) were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of frailty in patients with COPD. However, a higher educational attainment (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.43-0.69) and higher income (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.45-0.88) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of frailty in patients with COPD. A total of 17 other risk factors for frailty were identified via qualitative synthesis.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of frailty in patients with COPD is high, and there are many influencing factors.

Phenotypes and outcomes in non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: An unsupervised cluster analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation are characterized by great clinical heterogeneity and complexity. The usual classifications may not adequately characterize this population. Data-driven cluster analysis reveals different possible patient classifications.

AIMS

To identify different clusters of patients with atrial fibrillation who share similar clinical phenotypes, and to evaluate the association between identified clusters and clinical outcomes, using cluster analysis.

METHODS

An agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was performed in non-anticoagulated patients from the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation cohort. Associations between clusters and a composite outcome comprising stroke/systemic embolism/death and all-cause death, stroke and major bleeding were evaluated using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 3434 non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (mean age 70.3±17 years; 42.8% female). Three clusters were identified: cluster 1 was composed of younger patients, with a low prevalence of co-morbidities; cluster 2 included old patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, cardiac pathologies and a high burden of cardiovascular co-morbidities; cluster 3 identified old female patients with a high burden of cardiovascular co-morbidities. Compared with cluster 1, clusters 2 and 3 were independently associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio 2.85, 95% confidence interval 1.32-6.16 and hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.11, respectively) and all-cause death (hazard ratio 3.54, 95% confidence interval 1.49-8.43 and hazard ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.79, respectively). Cluster 3 was independently associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.78).

CONCLUSION

Cluster analysis identified three statistically driven groups of patients with atrial fibrillation, with distinct phenotype characteristics and associated with different risks for major clinical adverse events.

Impact of anthropometric factors on outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients: analysis on 10 220 patients from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)-European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) EurObservational Research Programme on Atrial Fibrillation (EORP-AF) general long-term registry

AIM

To investigate the association of anthropometric parameters [height, weight, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), and lean body mass (LBM)] with outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten-thousand two-hundred twenty patients were enrolled [40.3% females, median age 70 (62-77) years, followed for 728 (interquartile range 653-745) days]. Sex-specific tertiles were considered for the five anthropometric variables. At the end of follow-up, survival free from all-cause death was worse in the lowest tertiles for all the anthropometric variables analyzed. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, an independent association with all-cause death was found for the lowest vs. middle tertile when body weight (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95%CI 1.23-2.23), BMI (HR 1.65, 95%CI 1.23-2.21), and BSA (HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.11-2.01) were analysed in female sex, as well as for body weight in male patients (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.25-2.07). Conversely, the risk of MACE was lower for the highest tertile (vs. middle tertile) of BSA and LBM in males and for the highest tertile of weight and BSA in female patients. A higher occurrence of haemorrhagic events was found for female patients in the lowest tertile of height [odds ratio (OR) 1.90, 95%CI 1.23-2.94] and LBM (OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.40-3.26).

CONCLUSIONS

In AF patients height, weight, BMI, BSA, and LBM were associated with clinical outcomes, with all-cause death being higher for patients presenting lower values of these variables, i.e. in the lowest tertiles of distribution. The anthropometric variables independently associated with other outcomes were also different between male and female subjects.

Mobile health technology integrated care in older atrial fibrillation patients: a subgroup analysis of the mAFA-II randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The Mobile Health Technology for Improved Screening and Optimized Integrated Care in AF (mAFA-II) randomised trial demonstrated the efficacy of a mobile health (mHealth) technology-implemented 'Atrial fibrillation Better Care' (ABC) pathway-approach (mAFA intervention) in reducing the risk of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether these benefits also apply to older patients is unclear. In this ancillary analysis, we evaluated the effect of mAFA intervention among older AF patients.

METHODS

The mAFA-II trial enrolled adult AF patients across 40 centres in China. For this analysis, we defined older patients as those aged ≥75 years. Primary outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke or thromboembolism, all-cause death and rehospitalisation. The effect of mAFA intervention was assessed through multivariable Cox-regression models. We also evaluated the interaction between age and effect of the mAFA intervention in the main trial population.

RESULTS

In this analysis, we included 1,163 AF patients ≥75 years (mean age: 82.6 ± 5.3 years, 43.1% females); 520 were allocated to mAFA intervention, 643 to usual care. mAFA intervention was associated with a significant reduction of the primary composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.97) and rehospitalisations alone (aHR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.24-0.91). Significant interaction between age and mAFA intervention effect was observed for both the composite outcome (P = 0.002) and rehospitalisation alone (P = 0.015), with the effect decreasing as age increased, particularly among patients ≥80 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

A mHealth technology-implemented ABC pathway is effective in reducing adverse clinical outcomes in older AF patients. The benefits obtained with mAFA intervention were attenuated at extreme ages.

Clinical complexity and impact of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF General Long-Term Registry

BACKGROUND

Clinical complexity is increasingly prevalent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The 'Atrial fibrillation Better Care' (ABC) pathway approach has been proposed to streamline a more holistic and integrated approach to AF care; however, there are limited data on its usefulness among clinically complex patients. We aim to determine the impact of ABC pathway in a contemporary cohort of clinically complex AF patients.

METHODS

From the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry, we analysed clinically complex AF patients, defined as the presence of frailty, multimorbidity and/or polypharmacy. A K-medoids cluster analysis was performed to identify different groups of clinical complexity. The impact of an ABC-adherent approach on major outcomes was analysed through Cox-regression analyses and delay of event (DoE) analyses.

RESULTS

Among 9966 AF patients included, 8289 (83.1%) were clinically complex. Adherence to the ABC pathway in the clinically complex group reduced the risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.72, 95%CI 0.58-0.91), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; aHR: 0.68, 95%CI 0.52-0.87) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.58-0.85). Adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (aHR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.56-0.98) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.76, 95%CI 0.60-0.96) also in the high-complexity cluster; similar trends were observed for MACEs. In DoE analyses, an ABC-adherent approach resulted in significant gains in event-free survival for all the outcomes investigated in clinically complex patients. Based on absolute risk reduction at 1 year of follow-up, the number needed to treat for ABC pathway adherence was 24 for all-cause death, 31 for MACEs and 20 for the composite outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

An ABC-adherent approach reduces the risk of major outcomes in clinically complex AF patients. Ensuring adherence to the ABC pathway is essential to improve clinical outcomes among clinically complex AF patients.

Epidemiology and impact of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a medical syndrome characterised by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors. Data regarding the relationship between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) are still inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to perform a comprehensive evaluation of frailty in a large European cohort of AF patients.

METHODS

A 40-item frailty index (FI) was built according to the accumulation of deficits model in the AF patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Association of baseline characteristics, clinical management, quality of life, healthcare resources use and risk of outcomes with frailty was examined.

RESULTS

Among 10,177 patients [mean age (standard deviation) 69.0 (11.4) years, 4,103 (40.3%) females], 6,066 (59.6%) were pre-frail and 2,172 (21.3%) were frail, whereas only 1,939 (19.1%) were considered robust. Baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risks were independently associated with increasing FI. Frail patients with AF were less likely to be treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89), especially with non-vitamin K antagonist OACs and managed with a rhythm control strategy, compared with robust patients. Increasing frailty was associated with a higher risk for all outcomes examined, with a non-linear exponential relationship. The use of OAC was associated with a lower risk of outcomes, except in patients with very/extremely high frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of AF patients, there was a high burden of frailty, influencing clinical management and risk of adverse outcomes. The clinical benefit of OAC is maintained in patients with high frailty, but not in very high/extremely frail ones.

Frailty prevalence and impact on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,187,000 patients

Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by a reduced physiologic reserve, increased vulnerability to stressors and an increased risk of adverse outcomes. People with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often burdened by frailty due to biological, clinical, and social factors. The prevalence of frailty, its management and association with major outcomes in AF patients are still not well quantified. We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE, from inception to September 13th, 2021, for studies reporting the prevalence of frailty in AF patients. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021235854). 33 studies were included in the systematic review (n = 1,187,651 patients). The frailty pooled prevalence was 39.7 % (95 %CI=29.9 %-50.5 %, I² =100 %), while meta-regression analyses showed it is influenced by age, history of stroke, and geographical location. Meta-regression analyses showed that OAC prescription was influenced by study-level mean age, baseline thromboembolic risk, and study setting. Frail AF patients were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (OR=5.56, 95 %CI=3.46-8.94), ischemic stroke (OR=1.59, 95 %CI=1.00-2.52), and bleeding (OR=1.64, 95 %CI=1.11-2.41), when compared to robust individuals. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of frailty was high in patients with AF. Frailty may influence the prognosis and management of AF patients, thus requiring person-tailored interventions in a holistic or integrated approach to AF care.

Use and Prescription of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older and Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Document

In the last twelve years the clinical management of patients with atrial fibrillation has been revolutionised by the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. Despite the large amount of evidence produced, some populations remain relatively poorly explored regarding the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants, such as the oldest and/or frailest individuals. Frailty is clinical syndrome characterized by a reduction of functions and physiological reserves which results in individuals having higher vulnerability. While current evidence underlines a relationship between atrial fibrillation and frailty, particularly in determining a higher risk of adverse outcomes, data regarding effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in frailty atrial fibrillation patients are still lacking, leaving uncertainty about how to guide prescription in this specific subgroup. On these premises, this multidisciplinary consensus document explains why it would be useful to integrate the clinical evaluation performed through comprehensive geriatric assessment to gather further elements to guide prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in such a high-risk group of patients.