Use of Smart Toe(©) implant for small toe arthrodesis: A smart concept?

Classical Surgical Alternatives for the Treatment of Lesser Toe Deformities

Lesser toe deformities are the second most common deformities around the foot and ankle. Early reports of procedures for lesser toe correction date back to the 1880s. Lesser toe deformities have a high variability of appearance. Thorough assessment of the joints involved in the deformity is necessary. Numerous techniques of soft tissue and osseous interventions are available and need to be included for individual correction. Osseous corrections are usually accompanied by soft tissue procedures. Kirschner-wire fixation is still an effective method of fixation, but internal fixation is probably the way to go for the future if cost-effectiveness can be improved.

Complications of Lesser Toe Surgery: How To Avoid Them before Surgery and How To Assess and Treat Them When They Have Occurred

Complications following lesser toe surgery are challenging to manage. The keys to treatment of any of these conditions are, first, to try to avoid them through identification of patient- and surgeon-related variables that contribute to their development and, second, following the occurance of a complication, to understand what can and cannot be corrected with surgical and nonsurgical management. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of current literature, demonstrates best practices and approaches to lesser toe complications, and provides an illustration of clinical examples.

Comparison of Lesser Toe Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Versus Resection Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

The goal of this study was to compare operative outcomes after lesser toe deformity correction with either proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis or PIP joint resection arthroplasty. A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed with 37 patients (48 toes) operated on with one of these two procedures. Evaluation of the numeric rating scale score, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, osseous consolidation, and clinical outcome was performed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Both study groups showed significant improvement at 6 months postoperatively. Although osseous consolidation was significantly higher for the arthrodesis group (P=.001), this difference did not affect clinical outcomes, and at 6 months postoperatively, pain on the numeric rating scale was 0 (range, 0-7) for the arthroplasty group and 0 (range, 0-5) for the arthrodesis group (P=.669). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 83 (range, 39-95) and 80 (range, 59-95), respectively (P=.879). No difference was observed for signs of inflammation or axis correction. Even a direct comparison of toes with radiologically osseous fusion (n=16) with those without fusion (n=32) did not show any clinical differences. This randomized controlled study showed no clinical differences in outcome between PIP joint arthrodesis and PIP joint resection arthroplasty for correction of lesser toe deformities, with good to excellent outcomes for both groups. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):86-90.].

Flexor tenotomy for mallet toe with penetration of the middle phalanx head by dual-component intramedullary implant following proximal interphalangeal arthrodesis

Introduction

There is a risk of mallet toe following proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fusion for hammertoe. Here we describe a rare case of penetration of the dorsal aspect of the middle phalanx head by the distal portion of a dual-component intramedullary implant during progression of mallet toe that was treated with flexor tenotomy.

Presentation of case

A 59-year-old man underwent uneventful arthrodesis of the third PIP using a dual-component intramedullary implant and presented 6 months later with progressive mallet toe and swelling, pain, and ulceration over the distal interphalangeal joint of the third toe. Imaging showed that the distal portion of the implant had penetrated the dorsal aspect of the middle phalanx head. A longitudinal incision was made over the dorsum of the middle and proximal phalanges of the third toe and the implant was removed. A plantar incision was made at the metatarsophalangeal joint and the flexor tendon was cut to correct the mallet toe deformity. One year later, correction was satisfactory with an acceptable functional outcome and good pain relief.

Discussion

We successfully treated a man with penetration of the dorsal border of the middle phalanx head in the third toe by the distal portion of a dual-component intramedullary implant as a result of mallet toe that developed following PIP arthrodesis, by removing the implant and performing flexor tenotomy.

Conclusion

Addition of flexor tenotomy should be considered when performing PIP arthrodesis in a patient with risk factors for severe mallet toe.

•

Dual component intramedullary implant is useful for hammer toe.

•

Mallet toe occur after proximal interphalangeal arthrodesis.

•

Middle phalangeal head penetration by implant occur

•

Flexor tenotomy is useful for mallet toe.

Bone fixation techniques for managing joint disorders and injuries: A review study

The majority of surgical procedures treating joint disorders require a technique to realize a firm implant-to-tissue and/or a tissue-to-tissue fixation. Fixation methods have direct effects on survival, performance and integration of orthopedic implants This review paper gives an overview of novel fixation techniques that have been evaluated and optimized for orthopaedic joint implants and could be alternatives for traditional implant fixation techniques or inspirations for future design of joint implantation procedures.

METHOD

The articles were selected using the Scopus search engine. Key words referring to traditional fixation methods have been excluded to find potential innovative fixation techniques. In order to review the recent anchorage systems, only articles that been published during the period of 2010-2020 have been included.

RESULTS

A total of 57 studies were analyzed. The result revealed that three main fixation principles are being employed: using mechanical interlockings, employing adhesives, and performing tissue-bonding strategies.

CONCLUSION

The development of fixation techniques demonstrates a transformation from the general anchoring tools like K-wires toward application-specific designs. Several new methods have been designed and evaluated, which highlight encouraging results as described in this review. It seems that mechanical fixations provide the strongest anchorage. Employing (bio)-adhesives as fixation tool could revolutionize the field of orthopedic surgery. However, the adhesives must be improved and optimized to meet the requirements of an anchorage system. Long-term fixation might be formed by tissue ingrowth approaches which showed promising results. In most cases further clinical studies are required to explore their outputs in clinical applications.

Ideal implant choice for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in hammer toe/claw toe deformity correction: A systematic review

Intramedullary devices have been developed to reduce the problems associated with Kirschner (K)-wire fixation in proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the surgical outcomes of K-wires versus novel internal fixation devices in PIPJ arthrodesis in claw/hammer toe surgery. The databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase with keywords "claw toe OR hammer toe" AND "proximal interphalangeal OR PIP" AND "fusion OR arthrodesis." Clinical trials published in English with evidence levels I, II, and III were included. Five studies, including one randomized controlled trial and four case-controlled studies, were identified to meet the inclusion criteria. Overall, the studies showed promising results in union rates using the novel internal devices compared to K-wires. However, the novel internal devices seem not to present advantages in clinical parameters such as pain levels, patient satisfaction, foot-related function, or surgical complication rates.

SmartToe, ToeGrip and buried k-wire versus percutaneous k-wire fixation for 2nd PIPJ arthrodesis: A comprehensive review of outcomes

BACKGROUND

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a reliable and repeatable method of surgical correction for the semi-rigid and rigid hammer toe deformity. In recent years the authors have noted a significant increase in the use of novel intramedullary devices in place of the traditional percutaneous Kirschner wires (k-wire). This paper set out to critically review three methods of internal fixation; ToeGrip implant, SmartToe implant and buried k-wire technique in comparison to the traditional method of percutaneous k-wire fixation during arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joints (PIPJ) of the toes. The objectives were to review osseous fusion rates, infection, hardware complications, patient satisfaction, and the comparative cost of each modality.

RESULTS

In total 3878 outcomes were reviewed consisting of 3255 percutaneous k-wires, 347 SmartToe implants, 218 ToeGrip implants, and 58 buried k-wires. Overall Infection rates where low; SmartToe infection rates ranged between 1.2% and 5%, percutaneous k-wire fixation 0.3%-7% buried k-wire 3.3%. The SmartToe Implant had the highest hardware failure rate up to 20.7%, the lowest hardware failure occurred in percutaneous k-wire studies at 0.1%-4.3%, no evidence of hardware failure was associated in both ToeGrip and buried k-wire techniques. Percutaneous k-wire migration ranged between 4.4%-5.5% and 3.8%-10% for the SmartToe implant, all significantly lower than buried k-wire migration of 33%. The SmartToe implant demonstrated the highest mean osseous union rate 87.2%, 83% in ToeGrip studies, similar results between the buried k-wire and percutaneous k-wire studies 72% and 73% respectively. Individual unit costs for k-wires £0.37, ToeGrip implant £236.94 and SmartToe implants £331, demonstrating a 640 and 894 fold increase in cost when using implants in comparison to k-wires. Patient satisfaction was poorly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous k-wire fixation remains a reliable and cost effective method of stabilisation during hammertoe correction in comparison to newer more costly implantable devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV - critical literature review.

Prospective, Multicenter, Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Biointegrative, Fiber-Reinforced Implant for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

Background:

A novel biointegrative implant was developed for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis to treat hammertoe deformity. Composed of continuous reinforcing mineral fibers bound by bioabsorbable polymer matrix, the implant demonstrated quiescent, gradual degradation with complete elimination at 104 weeks in animal models. This prospective trial assessed the implant’s safety, clinical performance, and fusion rate of PIPJ arthrodesis for hammertoe correction.

Methods:

Twenty-five patients (mean age 63.9±7.5 years) who required PIPJ arthrodesis were enrolled at 3 centers. Outcomes included radiographic joint fusion, adverse events, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score, and patient satisfaction. Patients were evaluated 2, 4, 6, 12, and 26 weeks postoperatively.

Results:

Twenty-two patients (88%) achieved radiographic fusion at 26 weeks. All joints (100%) were considered clinically stable, with no complications or serious adverse events. Pain VAS improved from 5.3±2.5 preoperatively to 0.5±1.4 at 26 weeks postoperatively. FAAM-ADL total scores and level of functioning improved by mean 19.5±19.0 points and 24.4±15.7 percentage points, respectively, from preoperation to 26 weeks postoperation. Improvements in pain VAS and FAAM scores surpassed established minimal clinically important differences. All patients were very satisfied (84%) or satisfied (16%) with the surgery. Patient-reported postoperative results greatly exceeded (72%), exceeded (20%), or matched (8%) expectations.

Conclusion:

This prospective, multicenter, first-in-human clinical trial of a novel biointegrative fiber-reinforced implant in PIPJ arthrodesis of hammertoe deformity demonstrated a favorable rate of radiographic fusion at 12 and 26 weeks, with no complications and good patient-reported clinical outcomes.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, prospective case series.

Comorbidities Associated With Poor Outcomes Following Operative Hammertoe Correction in a Geriatric Population

Background:

Although complications following hammertoe correction surgery are rare, older patients with comorbid conditions are often considered poorer operative candidates compared with younger, healthier patients because of a suspected increased risk of adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine if the presence of multiple comorbidities was associated with increased complications or unsuccessful patient-reported outcomes following operative hammertoe correction in geriatric patients.

Methods:

Prospectively collected data was reviewed on 78 patients aged 60 years or older who underwent operative correction of hammertoe deformity. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale for pain and Short Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Summary with 1 year of follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on number of comorbidities (0 or 1 vs > 2) and then compared. The average age of patients was 69.4 years and the prevalence of comorbidities in the study population was as follows: 11.5% smokers, 25.6% on blood thinners, 15.4% with rheumatoid arthritis, 7.7% with diabetes mellitus, 2.6% with peripheral arterial disease, 6.4% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 11.5% with coronary artery disease, and 23.1% with osteoporosis.

Results:

Fifty-three patients (67.9%) had 0 or 1 comorbidity and 25 (32.1%) had 2 or more comorbidities. Compared to the 0 or 1 comorbidity group, the presence of multiple comorbidities was associated with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for superficial wound infection of 4.18 (P = .045) and deformity recurrence requiring surgery OR of 23.15 (P = .032). Patient-reported outcomes were similar between comorbidity groups.

Conclusions:

This study further informs foot and ankle specialists to maintain increased surveillance for postoperative complications and unsuccessful outcomes in patients with multiple comorbidities. Although geriatric patients still report significant improvements in both pain and function, patients with underlying medical conditions should be counseled about their increased risks when pursuing operative hammertoe correction.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

[Research progress of interphalangeal arthrodesis]

OBJECTIVE

To review the research progress of interphalangeal arthrodesis in the treatment of interphalangeal joint deformity.

METHODS

The literature about interphalangeal arthrodesis at home and abroad was extensively consulted, and the indications, fusion methods, fixation methods, complications, and so on were summarized and analysed.

RESULTS

The indications of interphalangeal arthrodesis are hammer toe, claw toe, and mallet toe. From the different forms of fusion surface, fusion methods include end-to-end, peg-in-hole, conical reamer type, and V-shape arthrodesis. There are three kinds of fixation methods: Kirschner wire fixation, stainless-steel wire suture fixation, and intramedullary fixation, and there are many kinds of intramedullary fixation. The complications of interphalangeal arthrodesis include vascular injury, fixation related complications, and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Interphalangeal arthrodesis is a good way to correct some deformities of toes, but the incidence of various complications can not be ignored, and there is still a lack of clinical research on interphalangeal arthrodesis.

The Two-Component Implant for Interphalangeal Fusion in Toe Deformities

BACKGROUND

Although Kirschner wire implantation is popular for treating toe deformities, complications frequently occur. To prevent pin-tract infection and difficult Kirschner wire extraction, several implants have been developed to improve treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone an interphalangeal fusion by two-component implant for the treatment of toe deformities were included. Thirty-one toes of 21 patients were evaluated retrospectively. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot scores were used in clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean operation duration per toe was 16.4 min (range, 13-26 min). The average AOFAS forefoot score was 42.76 (range, 23-57) preoperatively and 88.76 (range, 70-95) at 34.4 months (range, 26-46 months) after surgery. Mean follow-up was 14.8 months (range, 12-19 months). Compared with before surgery, the AOFAS score was increased significantly after surgery (P = .03 by t test). Three minor complications were encountered. In one patient an infection was observed. After the implants were removed (first month) she was treated successfully by debridement and antibiotic agents and, finally, Kirschner wire placement. The second patient had a fissure fracture at the proximal phalanx, but routine follow-up did not change. In the third patient, the locking mechanism had become loose (detected on day 1 radiography); it was remounted under fluoroscopy without opening the wound. No patients had a cutout, loss of alignment, recurrence, or persistent swelling.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of arthrodesis using the two-component implant were found to be safe and reliable, especially for hammer toe and fifth toe deformities.

The efficacy of an intramedullary nitinol implant in the correction of claw toe or hammertoe deformities

INTRODUCTION

A multitude of procedures has been described in the literature for the treatment of lesser toe deformities and there is currently no general consensus on the optimal method of fixation. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of an intramedullary nitinol implant for the correction of lesser toe deformities, and to determine if the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint are modified during patient follow-up after correction of the PIP joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective analysis of 36 patients with claw toe or hammertoe who were treated with an intramedullary nitinol implant. Clinical manifestations and angulation of the metatarsophalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeal (MTP, PIP, DIP) joints were evaluated in radiographic studies preoperatively, at first medical revision post-surgery, and after a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Complications such as non-union rate, implant rupture, and implant infection were also evaluated during follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients were women with an average age of 65.5 (range 47-82) years. The average follow-up time was 2.4 (range 1-5.7) years. Fifty intramedullary nitinol implants were used. The MTP joint extension and PIP joint flexion decreased by 15.9° (95% CI - 19.11 to - 12.63) and 49.4° (95% CI - 55.29 to - 43.52), respectively, at the end of follow-up. Moreover, the DIP joint flexion increased progressively during follow-up (13.7° pre-surgery versus 35.6 in last medical check-up, 95% CI 13.24-30.57). There were four (8%) asymptomatic implant ruptures. The rate of fusion was 98%.

CONCLUSION

The reduction of the PIP joint using an intramedullary nitinol implant is a good option in lesser toe deformities, with few complications and a high rate of arthrodesis. Moreover, the PIP joint reduction affects both the MTP and DIP joints.

Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Between a Static and Dynamic Implant

Hammertoe deformation is a frequent motive for consultation in forefoot surgery, and proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a classic treatment for fixed deformation, which tends to be achieved more and more thanks to specific implants. This work evaluated and compared clinical improvement, radiologic fusion, and complication rates between dynamic (Difuse®) and static (TinyFix®) implants from Biotech Ortho. A total of 95 patients (110 feet and 166 toes; 97 static and 69 dynamic implants) were included. Mean age was 63.6 (±12.6) years in the dynamic group and 62.3 (±14.01) years in the static group. Epidemiologic and intraoperative radiologic data were collected. Pain, toes deformity, complications, and radiologic findings (bone fusion and osteolysis) were recorded at 4 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up. Mean follow-up was 11.5 (range 4 to 28) months, and the position of the implants was more often satisfying in the dynamic group (p = .01). Fusion rates at 4 months were 67% and 80% in the dynamic and static groups, respectively (p = .05). Radiologic osteolysis occurred more frequently in the dynamic group (p = .05 at 4 months), and pain was still present in 3% in the dynamic group at the last follow-up compared with 7% in the static group. Complication rate was 7% in the dynamic group (implant fractures) and 4% in the static group. Revision was considered more often in the dynamic group (p = .01). The static titanium implant seems superior to the dynamic memory shape implant in Nitinol alloy with regard to fusion (p = .04), complications (p = .03), and revision rates (p = .01). The literature review seems to support the good results of static implants compared with the rest of the available arthrodesis implant solutions.

Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis with the intramedullary Lync® implant: Prospective study of 22 cases

Several techniques have been described for fusion of the distal interphalangeal joint. The intramedullary Lync^® implant (Novastep™) may be superior to other options as it is available in straight or bent configurations, does not need to be removed and does not require fingertip incisions. The objective of our prospective study was to determine the effectiveness of finger distal interphalangeal (DIP) arthrodesis with Lync^® implants. Between February 2016 and June 2017, we performed 22 cases of DIP arthrodesis with this implant. Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale, the joint range of motion was measured using a digital goniometer, the pulp to palm distance was measured using a ruler, and the QuickDASH Questionnaire was filled out. AP and lateral X-rays were used to look for secondary displacement at 3 weeks and joint fusion at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinical and radiological union defined as the presence of trabecular bone bridges across the arthrodesis site. The patients' mean age was 57.8 years ± 9.9 (36-73). The mean follow up was 10 months ± 4.9 (3-15). The pre-operative pain level was 6/10 ± 2.4 (0-10) and it was 1.3/10 ± 1.7 (0-6) at 3 months post-operative (P < 0.0001). The mean pre-operative DASH Score was 64/100 ± 16 (15.9-86.3) and it was 19/100 ± 14 (2.3-45.4) at 3 months post-operative (P < 0.0001). At the end of the study, 20 DIP joints were fused (91%); 18 joints had fused at the 3 month follow-up visit (82%). Three cases required reoperation. DIP arthrodesis with the Lync^® implant resulted in DIP fusion in 91% of cases. When fusion was achieved, it provided pain relief and improved function. The Lync^® implant is less bulky than other arthrodesis devices and does not need to be removed.

Proximal Interphalangeal Arthrodesis of Lesser Toes Utilizing K-Wires Versus Expanding Implants: Comparative Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND:

Lesser toe proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis is one of the most common foot and ankle elective procedures often using K-wires for fixation. K-wire associated complications led to development of intramedullary fixation devices. We hypothesized that X Fuse (Stryker) and Smart Toe (Stryker) would provide stronger and stiffer fixation than K-wire fixation.

METHODS:

12 cadaveric second toe pairs were used. In one group, K-wires stabilized 6 PIP joints, and 6 contralateral PIP joints were fixed with X Fuse. A second group used K-wires to stabilize 6 PIP joints, and 6 contralateral PIP joints were fixed with Smart Toe. Specimens were loaded cyclically with extension bending using 2-N step increases (10 cycles per step). Load to failure and initial stiffness were assessed. Statistical analysis used paired t tests.

RESULTS:

K-wire average failure force, 91.0 N (SD 28.3), was significantly greater than X Fuse, 63.3 N (SD 12.9) ( P < .01). K-wire average failure force, 102.3 N (SD 17.7), was also significantly greater than Smart Toe, 53.3 N (SD 18.7) ( P < .01). K-wire initial stiffness 21.3 N/mm (SD 5.7) was greater than Smart Toe 14.4 N/mm (SD 9.3) ( P = .02). K-wire failure resulted from bending of K-wire or breaching cortical bone. X Fuse typically failed by implant pullout. Smart Toe failure resulted from breaching cortical bone.

CONCLUSION:

K-wires may provide stiffer and stronger constructs in extension bending than the X Fuse or Smart Toe system. This cadaver study assessed stability of the fusion site at time zero after surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

Our findings provide new data supporting biomechanical stability of K-wires for lesser toe PIP arthrodesis, at least in this clinically relevant mode of cyclic loading.

Comparative Study of Intramedullary Hammertoe Fixation

BACKGROUND

Temporary Kirschner wire fixation (K-wire) is a widely used, low-cost fixation method for the correction of hammertoe deformity. Reported complications associated with K-wires prompted the development of new implants over the past decade. However, there is a lack of literature on comparative studies analyzing functional outcomes using validated questionnaires. The purpose of this study was to analyze functional outcomes in patients who had undergone proximal interphalangeal joint fusion using 2 types of intramedullary implant, the Smart Toe and the TenFuse, and to compare them with the outcomes in patients treated with standard K-wire fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of operative hammertoe correction by a single surgeon was performed in 96 patients followed for more than 12 months. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) validated questionnaires. Complications and fusion rates were also evaluated. Several patients in the study underwent corrections in different toes; thus, a total of 186 toes were included in the study. From these, 65 toes (34.9%) were treated with K-wire fixation, 94 (50.5%) with Smart Toe titanium implant, and 27 (14.5%) with TenFuse allograft implant.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in functional outcome and incidence of complications were observed among the 3 fixation groups, although the 2 intramedullary implants were associated with greater fusion rates and patient satisfaction. Breakage of the Smart Toe implant was significantly higher than that of the other fixations, with 10.6% of implants breaking within the first year postoperatively. SF-36 and VAS scores decreased 12 months after surgery for the 3 types of fixation, with no statistically significant differences observed.

CONCLUSION

The use of Smart Toe and TenFuse implants provided operative outcomes comparable to those obtained using a K-wire fixation and slightly better patient satisfaction. Our results suggest that utilization of these implants for hammertoe correction was a reasonable choice that provided good alignment, pain reduction, and improved function at final follow-up. However, they are more expensive than K-wires. For this reason, in-depth cost-benefit studies would be required to justify their use as a standard treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

The pathology and management of lesser toe deformities

Deformities of the lesser toes are common and can be associated with significant morbidity. These deformities are often multiple, and numerous treatment strategies have been described in the literature.The goal of surgical treatment is to improve symptoms by restoring alignment and function, and avoiding recurrence. In order to achieve this, it is essential for the treating surgeon to understand the normal anatomy and pathology of the various deformities.There is a paucity of prospective studies and randomised-controlled trials assessing the efficacy of specific interventions.We describe the normal anatomy and biomechanics of the lesser toes, and the pathology of commonly adult deformities. The rationale behind various treatment strategies is discussed and the results of published literature presented. Algorithms for the management of lesser toe deformities based on current literature are proposed. Cite this article: Malhotra K, Davda K, Singh D. The pathology and management of lesser toe deformities. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:409-419. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160017.