Infertility induced by cancer treatment: inappropriate or no information provided to majority of French survivors of cancer

Assisted reproductive technology in young BRCA carriers with a pregnancy after breast cancer: An international cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Very limited data exist on assisted reproductive technology (ART) use in BRCA1/2 carriers conceiving after breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the safety of ART to achieve a pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers.

METHODS

This is an international, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study including BRCA1/2 carriers with a pregnancy after prior breast cancer diagnosis at ≤ 40 years of age between 2000 and 2020. Outcomes were compared between young BRCA1/2 carriers who conceived using ART and those who conceived spontaneously.

RESULTS

Among 543 BRCA1/2 carriers with a pregnancy after breast cancer, 436 conceived spontaneously and 107 using ART. Of 107 pregnancies achieved with ART, 45 (42.1 %) were obtained using oocytes/embryo cryopreserved at diagnosis, 33 (30.8 %) after controlled ovarian stimulation for in-vitro-fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection or ovulation induction for intrauterine insemination or planned intercourse after anticancer treatments, 21 (19.6 %) after oocyte donation, while for 8 (7.5 %) patients type of ART was missing. Compared to patients in the no-ART group, those in the ART group were older at the time of conception, had more frequently hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and a longer median time from cancer diagnosis to conception. At a median follow-up of 5.2 years after conception, no apparent detrimental effect of ART on disease-free survival was observed (adjusted HR=0.72, 95 % CI 0.39-1.34).

CONCLUSION

In young BRCA1/2 carriers with a pregnancy after breast cancer, ART use did not appear to be associated with increased risk of DFS events.

Exploring fertility preservation in AYA cancer survivors: Information needs and post-cancer challenges

PURPOSE

To explore the experiences of fertility preservation (FP) and cancer-induced infertility among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, qualitative study was conducted by a sociologist in collaboration with a multidisciplinary team specializing in oncology and reproductive medicine. The sample included 31 AYA cancer survivors (13-35 years old) in remission for at least one year. Participants were recruited from oncology or reproductive departments and via "snowball" sampling. Semi-structured interviews, lasting 1-3 hours, were conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 31 participants (18 women, 13 men), 12 women and 12 men had undergone FP, while 6 women and 1 man had not. Some were fertile, some infertile, and others were unsure of their fertility status. Six women and 5 men had children post-cancer, while others were planning or not considering parenthood. Thus, the respondents' experiences of fertility were varied, and their analysis led to a number of observations: 1) a lack of attention to infertility risks prior to cancer treatment; 2) fertility preservation not linked to an imminent pregnancy after cancer raises unconsidered difficulties; 3) gaps in information and care beyond the question of fertility.

CONCLUSIONS

The study reveals a lack of information and attention to AYA-specific issues regarding fertility and endocrine function after cancer. There is a need for tailored informational resources for AYA survivors.

Parenthood in a Swedish prospective cohort of 1,378 adolescents and young adults banking semen for fertility preservation at time of cancer diagnosis

Background

The possibility of future parenthood is a highly relevant issue for patients of reproductive age facing oncologic treatment. This study aimed to investigate how fatherhood was achieved in a patient cohort of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) banking semen at time of cancer diagnosis and to determine the effectiveness of cryopreservation aimed at fertility preservation in the cohort.

Materials and methods

Observational cohort study examining AYAs with a cancer diagnosis who underwent semen banking for fertility preservation at Karolinska University Hospital 1988-2020, as part of the Stockholm regional fertility preservation program. This cohort is being prospectively followed since time of referral to the program, with most individuals included when presenting with primary cancers (Study Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NTC04602962). Individuals achieving adulthood in the cohort were followed-up regarding their reproductive outcomes by linking to the Swedish Multi-generation Register, to identify fatherhood through natural conception or adoption, and to the Swedish National Quality Registry for Assisted Reproduction to identify parenthood through medical assistance, including the use of own sperm either cryopreserved or fresh, or donor sperm.

Results

Of the 1,378 patients referred during the study period, 1,357 were eligible for fatherhood analysis (aged >20 years at the end of follow-up, December 31, 2021). In total, 493 men became fathers following cancer treatment: 399 (81%) did so naturally, 87 (18%) via assisted reproductive techniques (including two using donor sperm), and 7 (1%) through adoption. Of the 92 patients who used their cryopreserved sperm for assisted reproductive techniques, 34 (37%) successfully fathered a child. The patients may have had children prior to cryopreservation.

Conclusion

A large proportion of AYA cancer survivors achieved fatherhood through natural conception in this cohort, whereas less than 1 in 5 survivors needed medical assistance to conceive. Although a low utilization rate of cryopreserved sperm was found in this cohort, its use was highly effective in the group that developed infertility. At present there are no standardized predictors of testicular toxicity after cancer treatment, and inter-individual variability is high. Further research is needed to identify patients at risk of infertility who would benefit from fertility preservation.

Communication and sexual function and frequency in breast cancer patients 2 years after diagnosis: results from the VICAN 2 study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer treatments may have impacts on several aspects of sexual health, including psychological, psychosexual, physiological, physical, and relational.

AIM

In this study we sought to assess sexual function and sexual frequency in breast cancer patients 2 years after diagnosis.

METHODS

We selected all breast cancer participants from the the French national VIe après le CANcer 2 (VICAN 2) longitudinal study. Data sources included patient and medical questionnaires, along with medico-administrative databases.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes assessed were the dimensions of sexual function and frequency from the Relationship and Sexuality Scale and communication about sexuality with healthcare providers.

RESULTS

Out of 1350 participating women, 60.2% experienced a decrease in sexual desire, 61.4% reported a lower frequency of intercourse, and 49.5% faced decreased ability to orgasm. In contrast, 64.8% had engaged in sexual intercourse in the previous 2 weeks, 89.5% were "Somewhat" to "Very much" satisfied with the frequency of intimate touching and kisses with their partner, and 81.6% expressed satisfaction with their intercourse frequency. However, a mere 15% of women discussed sexuality with the healthcare providers. Independent factors associated with increased communication about sexuality included age younger than 50 years (OR = 1.90 95% CI [1.28-2.82], P = .001), being in a partner relationship (OR = 2.53 95% CI [1.28-2.82], P = .003), monthly income above 1,500 euros (OR = 1.73 95% CI [1.15-2.60], P = .009), and absence of diabetes (OR = 6.11 95% CI [1.39-26.93], P = .017).

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

The study findings underscore the need for continuing education in oncosexology and dedicated sexual health interventions that should involve a holistic approach that takes into consideration age, treatments, relationship status, and whether the patient has diabetes.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths of the study are the sample size, the national representativeness, and data reliability. However, the cross-sectional design could introduce potential recall, recency, or social desirability biases. Also, social determinants influencing sexual health, such as ethnicity or geographic locations, have not been considered in the analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that sexual disorders persist 2 years after a breast cancer diagnosis, with a noticeable communication gap regarding sexuality between patients and medical teams. These findings underscore the necessity for tailored sexual health interventions, particularly designed for women who are single, older aged, and diabetes patients.

Fertility preservation in reproductive-aged female patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in adults younger than 50 years is steadily increasing in the USA, and treatment for CRC can impact future fertility. However, fertility decision-making in female patients with CRC can be complex, with fertility preservation (FP) counseling occurring inconsistently.

PURPOSE

The goal of this scoping review was to assess the literature regarding the frequency and quality of fertility preservation (FP) discussions taking place among oncology clinicians and their reproductive-age female patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to identify existing gaps in care and inform future research, interventions, or potential changes in practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, and Scopus databases in order to identify studies pertaining to FP counseling in reproductive-age female patients with CRC. We used Covidence to screen studies for relevance and to extract data. Findings of interest included rate of fertility and/or FP discussions, patient characteristics associated with fertility discussions, initiators of discussions, rate of referrals to fertility specialists, patient utilization of FP services, and unmet fertility needs. We performed both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis.

RESULTS

We identified five studies that met our inclusion criteria, all published between 2007 and 2022. Frequency of fertility counseling discussions was low across studies, with a range of 15 to 52.5% of female patients with CRC receiving counseling. Patient characteristics which may be associated with likelihood of fertility discussion included age, parity, number of children, cancer location and stage, treatment type, and quality of life. The literature suggested that fertility discussions were initiated by clinicians about two-thirds of the time, and medical oncologists were the clinicians most likely to initiate. Studies did capture unmet fertility-related patient needs; participants who did not receive counseling often expressed desire for these discussions and regret that they did not occur.

CONCLUSION

Despite increasing incidence of CRC in patients at younger ages, this scoping review found a dearth of research conducted on young female CRC patients' experiences with fertility counseling and referrals. Notably, the existing research reveals that relatively few of these patients are receiving appropriate counseling. Additional research is needed to clarify current FP counseling practices, patient and clinician perceptions about FP, and ways to improve the quantity and quality of FP counseling in this patient population.

Factors Associated with Adolescent and Young Adult Males with Cancer Attending Fertility Consultation: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada

Purpose: Cancer and its treatment can impair fertility in men. It is recommended that they be referred for fertility consultation before the start of treatment. This study examined factors associated with men attending a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis. Methods: Males 15 to 39 years of age, diagnosed with cancer in Ontario, Canada, between 2006 and 2019, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Linked administrative data were used to obtain other clinical and sociodemographic variables. The main outcome was a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis, defined using Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing codes (606 or 628). A backward selection multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results: Of 13,720 cases identified, 8.5% attended a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis. A more recent year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-6.6), living in an urban area (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.8), receiving radiation therapy (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.6), chemotherapy (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.2), and reproductive organ-related cancer surgery (OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.7) were associated with a greater likelihood of attending a consultation. Older age (OR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.2), living in a northern region (OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5), having a cancer with low (OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.4) or moderate risk to fertility (OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.5-0.7), and residing in a neighborhood with lower income (OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.5) or residential instability quintile (OR = 0.8; 95% CI 0.6-1.0) were associated with being less likely to attend a consultation. Conclusion: Although rates of fertility consultation have increased over time, these remain low in various clinical and demographic groups. Funding for fertility preservation appears to have had an important impact on fertility consultation in young men with cancer.

Collaborative digital platform France - Cuba: oncorehabilitation in reproductive and sexual health

BACKGROUND

In the French West-Indies, few studies have been performed on fertility and sexual problems in cancer survivors, which are frequent and recurring issues reported by surveys on unmet needs. Additionally, mutualizing human and material resources and promoting cooperation through a collaborative platform are the most appropriate response to complex health pathways in the Caribbean territories. Implementation of such a collaborative platform will help to launch a strategic Caribbean partnership to transfer theoretical and technical skills and care standards in oncofertility and oncosexuality.

METHODS

We propose to set up a collaborative digital platform to strengthen, from the French expertise, Cuban health professionals' knowledge, know-how, and skills in oncofertility and oncosexuality. The project will be coordinated by a coordinating, scientific, and supervisory committee, and the main activities will include: 1. Theoretical training in e-learning adapted to low-speed Internet. 2. Practical training in fertility preservation and sexual rehabilitation. 3. Digital multidisciplinary consultation meetings for medical decisions to be taken for complex clinical cases. The platform will benefit from a recurrent evaluation, by the two cancer registries of Martinique and Cuba, with the following performance indicators: number of Cuban professionals trained, number of professionals sensitized, hourly volumes (or number of training courses provided), satisfaction of trained professionals, number of e-RCPs carried out online and number of missionaries supported. These indicators will be set up and analyzed by the registers. This project meets the Cuban and French health policies (cancer plans and national sexual health strategies) and will be implemented in liaison with the Health Agencies of both countries and the Embassy of France in Cuba.

DISCUSSION

This project aims to provide support through bilateral exchanges to improve reproductive and sexual health in Cuba's cancer patients. This collaboration will be based on a long-lasting French expertise and a solid Cuban health system. Consequently, this collaborative digital platform will contribute to data collection for cancer surveillance, and the two participating countries will ultimately be identified in the Caribbean as having centers of competence and excellence in oncofertility and oncosexuality with care standards.

The Effects of Negative Elements in Environment and Cancer on Female Reproductive System

With the development of human society, factors that contribute to the impairment of female fertility is accumulating. Lifestyle-related risk factors, occupational risk factors, and iatrogenic factors, including cancer and anti-cancer treatments, have been recognized with their negative effects on the function of female reproductive system. However, the exact influences and their possible mechanism have not been elucidated yet. It is impossible to accurately estimate the indexes of female fertility, but many researchers have put forward that the general fertility has inclined through the past decades. Thus the demand for fertility preservation has increased more and more dramatically. Here we described some of the factors which may influence female reproductive system and methods for fertility preservation in response to female infertility.

Barriers and Facilitators to Fertility-Related Discussions with Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer: Nurses' Experiences

Introduction: Improvements in cancer survival rates for teenagers and young adults (TYAs) have resulted in quality-of-life issues into survivorship becoming increasingly important. However, infertility is a potential late side effect of cancer treatment, which can negatively impact on quality of life. Advances in assisted reproductive technologies have resulted in increasingly effective fertility preservation (FP) options. Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions with TYAs with cancer aged 13-24 years. Methods: An interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Eleven purposively selected nurses working on a specialist TYA cancer unit participated in semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using IPA. Results: Parents/family were experienced as self-appointed informal gatekeepers who were perceived to hold the power to control nurses' access to communicate with young people about fertility issues. Nurses adopted a supportive role, which was enhanced by the positive nature of their relationship with the TYA. Uncertainty was expressed over whether the TYA had been fully informed of their infertility risk and potential FP options. Conclusions: Nurses should manage parental involvement sensitively if TYAs are to make informed decisions regarding their future reproductive health. There is a need for clear role delineation in fertility discussions to ensure that TYAs are provided with the opportunity to discuss infertility risk and be referred to a specialist before initiating cancer treatment. Nurses should cultivate the primacy of the nurse-TYA relationship to improve fertility care. Further research into the factors that TYAs may consider beneficial within the nurse-patient relationship is required.

Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy may cause infertility in young survivors of breast cancer. Various fertility preservation techniques increase the likelihood of survivors becoming genetic mothers. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis may impact decision making about fertility preservation. This protocol will develop and test the effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for helping women with breast cancer to make well-informed choices about fertility preservation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will be conducted in three phases using mixed methods. In phase I, the aim is to develop a web-based patient decision aid (PDA) in French with a steering committee and using a focus group of five women already treated for breast cancer. In phase II, the face validity of the decision aid will be assessed using questionnaires. In phase III, the PDA will be assessed by a two-arm randomised controlled trial. This will involve a quantitative evaluation of the PDA in clinical practice comparing the quality of the decision-making process between usual care and the PDA. The primary outcome will be informed choice and its components. The secondary outcomes will be decisional conflict and anxiety. Data will be collected during and after an oncofertility consultation. Phase III is underway. Since September 2018, 52 participants have been enrolled in the study and have completed the survey. We expect to have results by February 2020 for a total of 186 patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol was approved by the Ouest V Research Ethics Board. Results will be spread through peer-reviewed publications, and reported at suitable meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry .(NCT03591848).

[Sexual dysfunction among oncological patients: The importance of a specialized approach]

OBJECTIVES

Determination of the emotional and sexual impact after oncologic disease and patient's satisfaction regarding information provided by healthcare professionals. We also aim to evaluate the importance of sexology care during cancer treatment and follow-up.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study including patients admitted for radiation therapy. A questionnaire and an assessment of clinical data were assessed.

RESULTS

The study sample was composed by 104 patients. 60.6% had a negative impact on their sexual life after treatment and 62.5% were satisfied about the information given by healthcare professionals. About two thirds of the patients would accept sexology care during cancer treatment and/or follow-up. After a sub-group analysis, there were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding the prevalence of sexual dysfunction or needs for sexual care.

DISCUSSION

There is a well-known impact of cancer on sexuality since its diagnosis. Our patients feel themselves well informed about this by health professionals. Most of them would accept being referred to an oncosexology appointment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexuality must be discussed with cancer patients since their diagnosis. Oncosexuality care is necessary and desired by most patients as a mean for reduction of the cancer impact in their life quality.

How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care

BACKGROUND

Fertility preservation (FP) is an important quality of life issue for cancer survivors of reproductive age. Despite the existence of broad international guidelines, the delivery of oncofertility care, particularly amongst paediatric, adolescent and young adult patients, remains a challenge for healthcare professionals (HCPs). The quality of oncofertility care is variable and the uptake and utilization of FP remains low. Available guidelines fall short in providing adequate detail on how oncofertility models of care (MOC) allow for the real-world application of guidelines by HCPs.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the components of oncofertility care as defined by patient and clinician representatives, and identify the barriers, facilitators and challenges, so as to improve the implementation of oncofertility services.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic scoping review was conducted on oncofertility MOC literature published in English between 2007 and 2016, relating to 10 domains of care identified through consumer research: communication, oncofertility decision aids, age-appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, training, supportive care during treatment, reproductive care after cancer treatment, psychosocial support and ethical practice of oncofertility care. A wide range of electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, AEIPT, Education Research Complete, ProQuest and VOCED) were searched in order to synthesize the evidence around delivery of oncofertility care. Related citations and reference lists were searched. The review was undertaken following registration (International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) registration number CRD42017055837) and guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

OUTCOMES

A total of 846 potentially relevant studies were identified after the removal of duplicates. All titles and abstracts were screened by a single reviewer and the final 147 papers were screened by two reviewers. Ten papers on established MOC were identified amongst the included papers. Data were extracted from each paper and quality scores were then summarized in the oncofertility MOC summary matrix. The results identified a number of themes for improving MOC in each domain, which included: the importance of patients receiving communication that is of a higher quality and in different formats on their fertility risk and FP options; improving provision of oncofertility care in a timely manner; improving access to age-appropriate care; defining the role and scope of practice of all HCPs; and improving communication between different HCPs. Different forms of decision aids were found useful for assisting patients to understand FP options and weigh up choices.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This analysis identifies core components for delivery of oncofertility MOC. The provision of oncofertility services requires planning to ensure services have safe and reliable referral pathways and that they are age-appropriate and include medical and psychological oncofertility care into the survivorship period. In order for this to happen, collaboration needs to occur between clinicians, allied HCPs and executives within paediatric and adult hospitals, as well as fertility clinics across both public and private services. Training of both cancer and non-cancer HCPs is needed to improve the knowledge of HCPs, the quality of care provided and the confidence of HCPs with these consultations.

Cancer and fertility: optimizing communication between patients and healthcare providers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the status of guidelines and recommendations for communication between patients with cancer and healthcare providers (HCPs) concerning fertility issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

The timing, the type of information provided, and the openness of HCPs can all affect how patients with cancer perceive discussions regarding fertility concerns and preservation. In addition, whether such discussions occur is associated with intrinsic factors, such as age and sex of the patients as well as HCP's knowledge level. It has also been found that the patients have different needs for information regarding fertility preservation and preferences for types of communication strategies regarding the impact of their disease and treatments on options for family planning.

SUMMARY

Although discussions about fertility concerns in the context of cancer between physicians and patients are occurring more frequently, there are inconsistent findings regarding satisfaction with these discussions. Recent research has found that the timing, type of information given, and level of openness of the HCP can impact how patients perceive communications regarding the risks of cancer treatment on fertility preservation options and future family planning. Age, sex, and HCP's knowledge of fertility risks and fertility preservation services are also notable factors associated with whether and how extensively discussions about fertility take place. More women than men report having a fertility discussion with an HCP. However, men are more likely to report satisfaction with the fertility discussion than women.

Fertility status perception, fertility preservation and desire to have children in cancer survivors: French VICAN survey

Aim

To report fertility status perception, fertility preservation and desire to have children in French cancer survivors 2 and 5 years after diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 427 women and 115 men self-reported treatment-induced infertility, fertility status, access to gamete conservation, desire to have children and pregnancy/live births.

Results

A total of 96.5% of men and 92.9% of women were thought to be fertile at diagnosis and 38% desired to have children. A total of 57.8% of men and 67.4% of women declared that no fertility preservation had been discussed before treatment. After 2 years, 26.8% of patients still desired to have children. After 5 years, 18 live births have been reported.

Conclusion

Despite a legal obligation and technical progress, there is a lack of information given to patients.

A fertility needs assessment survey of male cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe fertility-related informational needs and practices, and to examine if demographic characteristics are related to these needs and practices.

METHODS

A needs assessment survey was conducted at three Canadian cancer centres.

RESULTS

192 male cancer patients (Mage = 33.6) completed the survey. Most patients (70%) recalled having had a discussion with a health care provider regarding their fertility and 44% banked their sperm. Patients reported not getting all the information that they wanted, eg, the risk that a future child may have the same type of cancer (78%), and what was covered by insurance plans (71%). Barriers to sperm preservation were urgency to begin cancer treatment (49%), not planning to have a child in the future (47%) and worries that cancer could be passed on to future children (38%). Participants' age and being the parent of a child were significantly associated with having had a discussion about fertility. Participants' age, province, being the parent of a child and the desire for future children were significantly associated with fertility preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

Discussions with health care providers were more frequent, and fertility preservation rates were higher than in past studies, but still not all patients' questions were answered. Misconceptions about passing on cancer to one's child, and that sperm preservation will delay treatment, should be dispelled. Health care providers can ask patients if they have any desire to have children in the future as a way to initiate a discussion of fertility preservation. Key information gaps and psychosocial resource needs are suggested to fully meet male cancer patients' fertility-related concerns.

Cancer Impact, Complementary/Alternative Medicine Beliefs, and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among cancer impact, belief in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), CAM use, and quality of life (QOL).

DESIGN

The study used a cross-sectional, descriptive correlational design with convenience sampling. A total of 122 cancer patients participated. Data were collected at a medical center in Chunghua, Taiwan. The questionnaires included the Chinese version of the Cancer Problem in Living Scale (CPILS), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Belief Inventory (CAMBI), Complementary and Alternative Medicine scale, and Chinese versions of QOL scales, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).

RESULTS

The mean age was 56.5 years, and most participants were male (n = 69, 56.6%), had completed high school or above (n = 56, 45.9%), and were married (n = 109, 89.3%). The most common type of cancer was oral (n = 17, 13.9%), followed by esophageal (n = 15, 12.3%) and colorectal (n = 13, 10.7%). Cancer patients, on average, use one or two types of CAM. The impact of cancer is significantly related to age (F = 7.12, p < 0.05), and income is related to QOL (F = 3.61, p < 0.05). Pearson correlations showed that the use of CAM was positively associated with belief in CAM (CAMBI) (r = 0.26, p = 0.01), and the impact of cancer was highly negatively associated with QOL (r = -0.71, p = 0.001). The predictors of QOL were the impact of cancer and use of CAM, and the impact of cancer accounted for 51% of the variance in QOL.

CONCLUSION

This study supports research on the impact of cancer, belief in CAM, and use of CAM as related to QOL in cancer patients. These results can be used to provide options to clinicians and cancer patients.

Medical consultations about fertility preservation with haematological patients of childbearing age: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

Oncological treatments can cause serious long-term consequences, including effects on patients' fertility. Communication about possible fertility impairment is essential for cancer patients who want to have children. When oncologists initiate this discussion in a timely manner, patients can be referred to fertility specialists and avail themselves of fertility preservation methods. The oncologist plays a key role in this context.

METHODS

30 cancer patients of childbearing age (21-43 years) took part in semi-structured interviews between March 2011 and April 2012 about fertility and their desire to have children. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

Physician-patient consultations broached the issue as a central theme in almost all patients. A few consultations were patient initiated, and the majority took place before the beginning of treatment. Almost half of the patients were satisfied with their consultations and were referred to a fertility specialist. The ideal setting for these conversations is in the presence of the patient's partner, in a private space, before the beginning of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients should be informed about the possibility of their fertility being impaired due to treatments, even if they have not explicitly expressed wanting children. The oncologist is the first and most important contact for the patient and, hence, should bring up the issue of family planning and fertility. An interdisciplinary communication and collaboration between oncologists and fertility specialists can improve patient care.

Satisfaction with fertility- and sexuality-related information in young women with breast cancer--ELIPPSE40 cohort

Background

Young breast cancer survivors are often dissatisfied with the information provided on fertility and sexuality. Our aim was to discuss possible contributing factors and to propose strategies to increase patient satisfaction with such information.

Methods

Using the French National Health Insurance System database, we constituted the ELIPPSE40 regional cohort of 623 women, aged 18–40, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2005 and 2011. As of January 2014, 319 women had taken part in the 10-, 16-, 28 and 48-month telephone interviews. Satisfaction with the information provided about the potential impact of cancer and its treatment on fertility and sexuality was assessed at 48 months after diagnosis on 5-point Likert scales.

Results

Four years after diagnosis, only 53.0 and 42.6 % of women were satisfied with fertility- and sexuality-related information, respectively, without any significant change over the 2009–2014 period (P = 0.585 and P = 0.676 respectively). The two issues were moderately correlated (ρ = 0.60; P <0.001). General satisfaction with medical follow-up was the only common correlate. Irrespective of sociodemographic and medical characteristics, satisfaction with fertility-related information was greater among women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer who had the opportunity to ask questions at the time of cancer disclosure. Satisfaction with sexuality-related information increased with the spontaneous provision of information by physicians at cancer disclosure.

Conclusions

Promoting both patients’ question asking behavior and more systematic information could improve communication between caregivers and young breast cancer survivors and address distinct unmet needs regarding fertility- and sexuality- related information.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1542-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Oncofertility and breast cancer: Where have we come from, where are we going?]

BACKGROUND

Focusing on the current context of national and international recommendations, techniques development to evaluate and preserve fertility and patients' claims, this study aims to make a survey about the management of patients' breast cancer regarding oncofertility.

METHODS

Retrospective and analytic study of medical practices at Bergonié Institute of health professionals (medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, nurses) dedicated to the care of non-disseminated breast cancer patients younger than 37, needing medical treatment.

RESULTS

The number of participants was 230. The most interested practitioners in fertility theme are those of multidisciplinary consultation and surgeons (P<0.001), with an increasing interest during last years (P<0.05). The information about hypofertilizing risks of treatments are delivered most of the time by oncologists (57.7%). The motherhood project is expressed by 11 patients (4.9%) before treatment, only 4 of them receive information on the risks and 49 patients (21.7%) during follow-up. Only 24 patients (48% of the 49) are encouraged for motherhood.

CONCLUSION

To satisfy patients' requests, several improvements have to be made regarding the patients' information, the health professionals' awareness and care coordination.

Sperm cryopreservation in adolescents and young adults with cancer: results of the French national sperm banking network (CECOS)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of fertility preservation in adolescent males with cancer.

DESIGN

Large multicenter retrospective study of male patients ≤20 years from 23 centers of a national network of sperm banks over a 34-year period.

SETTING

Sperm banks.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 4,345 boys and young men aged 11 to 20 years.

INTERVENTION(S)

Age, cancer diagnosis, feasibility of sperm banking, and sperm parameters.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Description of patients, and success of their fertility preservation.

RESULT(S)

We observed a mean yearly increase in referred patients of 9.5% (95% confidence interval, 9.1%-9.8%) between 1973 and 2007. Over the study period, the percentage of younger cancer patients who banked their sperm increased, especially in the 11-14 year age group, rising from 1% in 1986 to 9% in 2006. We found that 4,314 patients attempted to produce a semen sample, 4,004 succeeded, and sperm was banked for 3,616. The mean total sperm count was 61.75 × 10(6) for the 11-14 year age group, and 138.81 × 10(6) for the 18-20 year age group. It was noteworthy that intercenter variations in practices involving young patients seeking to preserve their fertility before cancer therapy were observed within this national network.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our results emphasize the need for decisive changes in public health policy to facilitate the access to reproductive health-care for young cancer patients.

[Oncofertility program at the Montpellier university hospital 2 years after]

OBJECTIVE

Female fertility preservation in the context of cancer management is crucial for patient's health care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncofertility practice at our university hospital of Montpellier since 2011.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The evaluation of management of young patients referred to Montpellier University Hospital from September 2011 to September 2013 for oncofertility counselling before cancer treatment.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were referred to a specialized oncofertility center. Forty-two patients (59.1%) were included in the oncofertility program. Twenty-two patients (31%) were proposed for oocyte vitrification after COS protocol, eight patients (11.3%) for ovarian tissue cryoconservation, seven patients (9.9%) for GnRH injections, three patients (4.2%) ovarian transposition and two patients (2.8%) for embryo cryopreservation. Among the 42 indications of fertility preservation, only 18 will have finally taken place.

CONCLUSION

Oncofertility counselling for young patients should now be part of the cancer management. It involves multidisciplinary teams. Further information of both oncologists and patients is needed to improve this new approach in the field of cancer treatments.

Semen quality of consecutive ejaculates from cancer patients for fertility preservation

OBJECTIVE

To study variations in semen parameters among cancer patients who visited a sperm banking clinic before undergoing cancer treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive study.

SETTING

University-based hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty-six patients, diagnosed with various cancers, undergoing multiple semen collections on 5 consecutive days, for fertility preservation, between 2004 and 2013.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Within- and between-subject coefficients of variation were estimated using a random-effects analysis of variance to assess the consistency of semen parameters (volume, sperm concentration, motility, rapid motility, total motile sperm count, and computer-based sperm parameters), whereas intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess the size of the between-component of variance relative to the total component of variance.

RESULT(S)

When analyzing semen parameters over a maximum of 5 consecutive days, only the semen volume was significantly reduced in day-1 and -3 samples compared with the first sample. Almost all of the parameters showed high ICC values, suggesting that within-subject fluctuations were small relative to the between-subject variability. The highest ICC values were noted in volume (ICC 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.89), followed by total motile count (ICC 0.71; 95% CI 0.30-0.89); the least consistent measure was wobble (ICC 0.14; 95% CI -0.13, 0.51).

CONCLUSION(S)

Repeated ejaculates from cancer patients did not show substantial variation in semen quality.

Impact of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation on women's fertility

INTRODUCTION

Available data on women fertility for younger patients treated using RIC Allo-SCT are still limited. We evaluated ovarian function and fertility among female patients younger than 35 years who received RIC Allo-SCT for hematological malignancy or aplastic anemia (AA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Information on therapies before RIC Allo-SCT were collected. Data on ovarian function and fertility evaluation after RIC Allo-SCT included clinical and biological criteria. Twenty-two patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

After RIC Allo-SCT, amenorrhea affects 68.1% of patients. Ovarian function was impaired for 86.3% of cases. All 3 AA patients have regular cycles and became pregnant after RIC Allo-SCT. Only 6 (27.2%) patients declared to have been correctly informed before RIC Allo-SCT on potential deleterious effects on fertility of anticancer treatment and only 36.8% of patients with ovarian failure had a hormonal supplementation.

CONCLUSION

Results showed a high rate of ovarian failure, evaluated by clinical and biological criteria. The difference between AA and malignant diseases might suggest that a potential deleterious role was played by previous anticancer treatments rather than by RIC Allo-SCT.

Cancer patients' and professional caregivers' needs, preferences and factors associated with receiving and providing fertility-related information: a mixed-methods systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Cancer treatment can impair fertility. The aim of this review was to investigate (1) fertility information needs, receipt and provision, (2) fertility information preferences, and (3) factors associated with receiving/providing fertility information. Cancer patients' and professional caregivers' perspectives were considered.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, CRD, Embase) were systematically screened to retrieve articles published between January 2001 and March 2012. Reference lists and conference abstracts were checked for additional publications.

REVIEW METHODS

The principles outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention were applied. Publications were included if they explored fertility-related information/communication in cancer patients/survivors of reproductive age or professional caregivers. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for Qualitative Studies and the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies were used to assess the methodological quality. A standardised form based on the Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews was used to extract the data. Two independent reviewers performed all methodological steps.

RESULTS

Of the 1872 papers found, 27 were included in this review. The majority (66-100%) of the cancer patients wanted information about the impact of cancer therapy on fertility. The need and importance were higher in younger and childless patients, and in patients having childbearing plans. The number of patients receiving this information ranged from 0% to 85%. Several factors were associated with the lack of information receipt, including female gender and age 35 years or older. Patients preferred information via an individual consultation. In the diagnostic phase patients needed information about the impact of the treatment on fertility and preservation options. At the end or after the treatment, information needs shifted towards long term effects. Professional caregivers experienced several barriers in providing fertility information, including caregiver-, patient- and institutional-related factors. Nurses in particular, perceived difficulty in providing fertility-related information due to additional barriers associated with limited responsibility and opportunity in fertility information provision.

CONCLUSION

Professional caregivers experienced multiple barriers that hinder information provision. Further exploration of the role of Advanced Nurse Practitioners/Midwifes and the development of an evidence based intervention to overcome caregiver-related barriers are recommended to improve information provision.

Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

What are the outcomes of French emergency IVF procedures involving embryo freezing for fertility preservation before gonadotoxic treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Pregnancy rates after emergency IVF, cryopreservation of embryos, storage, thawing and embryo transfer (embryo transfer), in the specific context of the preservation of female fertility, seem to be similar to those reported for infertile couples undergoing ART.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A French retrospective multicentre cohort study initiated by the GRECOT network-the French Study Group for Ovarian and Testicular Cryopreservation. We sent an e-mail survey to the 97 French centres performing the assisted reproduction technique in 2011, asking whether the centre performed emergency IVF and requesting information about the patients' characteristics, indications, IVF cycles and laboratory and follow-up data. The response rate was 53.6% (52/97).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Fourteen French centres reported that they performed emergency IVF (56 cycles in total) before gonadotoxic treatment, between 1999 and July 2011, in 52 patients.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The patients had a mean age of 28.9 ± 4.3 years, and a median length of relationship of 3 years (1 month-15 years). Emergency IVF was indicated for haematological cancer (42%), brain tumour (23%), sarcoma (3.8%), mesothelioma (n = 1) and bowel cancer (n = 1). Gynaecological problems accounted for 17% of indications. In 7.7% of cases, emergency IVF was performed for autoimmune diseases. Among the 52 patients concerned, 28% (n = 14) had undergone previous courses of chemotherapy before beginning controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). The initiation of gonadotoxic treatment had to be delayed in 34% of the patients (n = 19). In total, 56 cycles were initiated. The mean duration of stimulation was 11.2 ± 2.5 days, with a mean peak estradiol concentration on the day on which ovulation was triggered of 1640 ± 1028 pg/ml. Three cycles were cancelled due to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (n = 1), poor response (n = 1) and treatment error (n = 1). A mean of 8.2 ± 4.8 oocytes were retrieved, with 6.1 ± 4.2 mature oocytes and 4.4 ± 3.3 pronuclear-stage embryos per cycle. The mean number of embryos frozen per cycle was 4.2 ± 3.1. During follow-up, three patients died from the consequences of their disease. For the 49 surviving patients, 22.5% of the couples concerned (n = 11) requested embryo replacement. A total of 33 embryos were thawed with a post-thawing survival rate of 76%. Embryo replacement was finally performed for 10 couples with a total of 25 embryos transferred, leading to one biochemical pregnancy, one miscarriage and three live births. Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth per couple who wanted a pregnancy after cancer were, respectively, 36% (95% CI = 10.9-69.2%) and 27% (95% CI = 6.0-61%).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The overall response rate for clinics was 53.6%. Therefore, it is not only that patients may not have been included, but also that those that were included were biased towards the University sector with a response rate of 83% (25/30) for a small number of patients.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

According to literature, malignant disease is a risk factor for a poor response to COS. However, patients having emergency IVF before gonadotoxic treatment have a reasonable chance of pregnancy after embryo replacement. Embryo freezing is a valuable approach that should be included among the strategies used to preserve fertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was sought for this study. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

[Fertility preservation among patients with cancer: report of a French regional practical experience]

OBJECTIVE

Improvement in cancer treatments has led to reconsider the importance of quality of life after cancer, especially concerning maintening the potential of fertility since it is often altered after healing. Our objective was to estimate the knowledge and practices of the physicians in the field of Oncology in a French Region (Provence Alpes- Côte d'Azur).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Prospective survey, conducted between January and April 2012, amongst oncologists working in Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur region, through questionnaires distributed during multidisciplinary meetings in oncology.

RESULTS

Among 225 replies, 54% of the physicians had sent no patient to any oncofertility consultation during the previous six months (n=120). Besides, 33% of the oncologists (n=68) declared they had difficulties in addressing their patients to oncofertility consultation, and 58% of them (n=39) considered they lacked information on techniques and indications of fertility preservation.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an estimation of the current practices in PACA region concerning oncofertility and underlines the physicians' need of information. In this context, the regional oncology network has set up a regional network « cancer and fertility » in order to facilitate the access to fertility preservation prior to any potentially sterilizing treatment for all patients.

Two years after cancer diagnosis, what is the relationship between health-related quality of life, coping strategies and spirituality?

This study aimed to analyze the relationship between spirituality, coping strategies and health-related quality of life (HRQL) among a large representative sample of patients two years after cancer diagnosis. Using a cross-sectional design, medical and self-reported data were collected by physicians and a patient telephone interview, respectively. Among 4270 participants, 54.6% reported that spirituality was not a source of comfort at all during the disease, 23.4% stated that it was a source of moderate comfort and 22.5% a source of great comfort. After adjustment for age, gender, educational level and living in a couple, a multivariate analysis showed that a lower mental HRQL score was independently associated with finding moderate comfort in spirituality when compared with finding no comfort at all. After multiple adjustment, a lower score of physical HRQL and a higher score of fighting spirit were independently associated with having found great comfort in spirituality when compared with those who found no comfort at all. This study aimed to understand the dynamics of religious beliefs among cancer patients over the disease duration and to understand how these beliefs could be considered and utilized by patients as a source of comfort and support. The results highlight not only the role spirituality may play in disease management and the extent to which it may be a valuable source of comfort during the follow-up of cancer patients, but also its role in the evaluation of the different dimensions of HRQL.

Raw and test-thaw semen parameters after cryopreservation among men with newly diagnosed cancer

OBJECTIVE

To characterize sperm parameters from thawed semen samples of men with different cancers who cryopreserved semen before oncologic therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENT(S)

1,010 semen samples collected between 1994 to 2010.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Mean total motile count (TMC), change in percentage motility and percentage survival (100 * [postthaw % motility/raw % motility]) for each cancer compared with data from samples of men without cancer (the "procreative management" group), and proportion of postthaw samples with TMC >5 × 10(6).

RESULT(S)

The procreative management group had the best raw and postthaw semen quality. The best raw and postthaw semen quality for cancer patients occurred in those with prostate cancer (TMC of 155.1 and 53.2 × 10(6), respectively) and the worst in those with leukemias. Lymphoid leukemias demonstrated the worst raw TMC (26.8 × 10(6)), but myeloid leukemias displayed the worst postthaw TMC (6.9 × 10(6)). The testicular cancer group was the only group with a statistically significantly lower chance of having TMC >5 × 10(6).

CONCLUSION(S)

Men with testicular cancer were most commonly referred for sperm cryopreservation and were the only group that was statistically significantly less likely to have TMC >5 × 10(6) on postthaw semen analysis. The most severe reduction in TMC was seen in the myeloid leukemia group, suggesting that these patients along with men with testis cancer and those with lymphoid leukemia should be counseled to provide increased numbers of specimens for fertility preservation.

Addressing oncofertility needs: views of female cancer patients in fertility preservation

A total of 41 questionnaires were returned from 64 respondents who consented to receive a questionnaire through the mail. Almost all valued the opportunity to receive consultation to address their fertility concerns and discuss fertility preservation options. Psychological stress, time pressure, and costs were identified as main factors affecting respondents' decision to proceed with in-vitro fertilization to cryopreserve oocytes or embryos. About one third indicated that the discussion of fertility matters was initiated by themselves, their friends, and families rather than their health care providers. The findings have identified several major barriers encountered by female cancer patients when seeking fertility preservation services.

Racial, socioeconomic, and demographic disparities in access to fertility preservation in young women diagnosed with cancer

BACKGROUND

This study seeks to examine the relation between sociodemographic characteristics and the utilization of fertility preservation services in reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1041 women diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18 and 40 years responded to a retrospective survey on demographic information and reproductive health history. Five cancer types were included: leukemia, Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. Nine hundred eighteen women reported treatment with potential to affect fertility (chemotherapy, pelvic radiation, pelvic surgery, or bone marrow transplant). Student t test, linear regression, and multivariate logistic regression were used where appropriate to determine the relation between sociodemographic characteristics and the odds of using fertility preservation services.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of women were counseled on the risk of cancer treatment to fertility by the oncology team. Overall, 4% of women pursued fertility preservation. In multivariate analysis, women who had not attained a bachelor's degree (odds ratio [OR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9) were less likely to be counseled. Trends also suggested possible disparities in access to fertility preservation with age older than 35 years (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-1.4) or previous children (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1) at diagnosis. Disparities in access to fertility preservation based on ethnicity and sexual orientation were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic health disparities likely affect access to fertility preservation services. Although awareness of fertility preservation has improved in the past decade, an unmet need remains for reproductive health counseling and fertility preservation in reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer.

Exploring the concept of uncertain fertility, reproduction and motherhood after cancer in young adult women

Exploring the concept of uncertain fertility, reproduction and motherhood after cancer in young adult women The topics of uncertainty in illness and infertility--as separate entities--are well covered and critiqued in the literature. Conversely, no research has been identified that specifically relates to the uncertain fertility, reproduction and motherhood challenges faced by young women after cancer. Therefore, there has been no opportunity to extend understanding, adequately acknowledge or effectively manage the needs of young women who may face unique reproductive uncertainties after cancer. The objective of this article is to provide a descriptive review of the literature and present what is currently known about uncertainty in the context of cancer and in relation to fertility, reproduction and motherhood. This article sets out the need for an increased research focus into this aspect of cancer survivorship to minimise the unique psychosocial challenges these women often face. Raising awareness and acknowledging the significance and impact of uncertain reproductive capacity on younger women's psychosocial health will aid cancer co-ordinators, nurses and other health professionals to formulate and deliver timely and appropriate education, management and support.