Antagonist/letrozole protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a comparative study with the microdose flare-up protocol

The Potential Protective Role of Mitochondrial Haplogroup R in Ovarian Response: An Exploratory Study

An investigation of the mtDNA haplogroup in 96 Taiwanese women with diminished ovarian response (DOR) and normal ovarian response (NOR) showed that only the haplogroup R is less likely to experience DOR than other mtDNA haplogroups. When analyzing the relationship between age and mitochondria-related markers (mtDNA copy number, ROS levels, and telomere length), it was observed that ROS levels and telomere length exhibited age-dependent changes, and the number of retrieved oocytes decreased with age. However, in the R haplogroup, these mitochondria-related markers remained stable and did not show significant changes with age. Additionally, in the R haplogroup, the number of oocytes did not decline with age, suggesting a unique protective effect associated with this haplogroup. Our study supports the notion that the mtDNA haplogroup may serve as a biomarker for infertility in Taiwanese women.

Stem-Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Unlocking New Possibilities for Treating Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

Despite advancements in assisted reproductive technology (ART), achieving successful pregnancy rates remains challenging. Diminished ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency hinder IVF success-about 20% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients face a poor prognosis due to a low response, leading to higher cancellations and reduced birth rates. In an attempt to address the issue of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), we conducted systematic PubMed and Web of Science research, using keywords "stem cells", "extracellular vesicles", "premature ovarian insufficiency", "diminished ovarian reserve" and "exosomes". Amid the complex ovarian dynamics and challenges like POI, stem cell therapy and particularly the use of extracellular vesicles (EVs), a great potential is shown. EVs trigger paracrine mechanisms via microRNAs and bioactive molecules, suppressing apoptosis, stimulating angiogenesis and activating latent regenerative potential. Key microRNAs influence estrogen secretion, proliferation and apoptosis resistance. Extracellular vesicles present a lot of possibilities for treating infertility, and understanding their molecular mechanisms is crucial for maximizing EVs' therapeutic potential in addressing ovarian disorders and promoting reproductive health.

Combining early pregnancy bleeding with ultrasound measurements to assess spontaneous abortion risk among infertile patients

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies in patients with infertility result in spontaneous abortion. However, despite its potential to have a profound and lasting effect on physical and emotional well-being, the natural history of spontaneous abortion in women with infertility has not been described. Although vaginal bleeding is a common symptom in pregnancies conceived via reproductive technologies, its prognostic value is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the combination of early pregnancy bleeding and first-trimester ultrasound measurements to determine spontaneous abortion risk.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with infertility who underwent autologous embryo transfer resulting in singleton intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Early pregnancy symptoms of bleeding occurring before gestational week 8 and measurements of crown-rump length and fetal heart rate from ultrasounds performed during gestational week 6 (6 0/7 to 6 6/7 weeks of gestation) and gestational week 7 (7 0/7 to 7 6/7 weeks of gestation) were recorded. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance was adjusted a priori for patient age, embryo transfer day, and transfer of a preimplantation genetic-tested embryo to estimate the relative risk and 95% confidence interval of spontaneous abortion for dichotomous variables. The relative risks and positive predictive values for early pregnancy bleeding combined with ultrasound measurements on the occurrence of spontaneous abortion were calculated for patients who had an ultrasound performed during gestational week 6 and separately for patients who had an ultrasound performed during gestational week 7. The primary outcome was spontaneous abortion in the setting of vaginal bleeding with normal ultrasound parameters. The secondary outcomes were spontaneous abortion with vaginal bleeding and (1) abnormal crown-rump length, (2) abnormal fetal heart rate, and (3) both abnormal crown-rump length and abnormal fetal heart rate.

RESULTS

Of the 1858 patients who were included (359 cases resulted in abortions and 1499 resulted in live births), 315 patients (17.0%) reported vaginal bleeding. When combined with ultrasound measurements from gestational week 6, bleeding was significantly associated with increased spontaneous abortion only when accompanied by absent fetal heart rate (relative risk, 5.36; 95% confidence interval, 3.36-8.55) or both absent fetal heart rate and absent fetal pole (relative risk, 9.67; 95% confidence interval, 7.45-12.56). Similarly, when combined with ultrasound measurements from gestational week 7, bleeding was significantly associated with increased spontaneous abortion only when accompanied by an abnormal assessment of fetal heart rate or crown-rump length (relative risk, 5.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.83-14.19) or both fetal heart rate and crown-rump length (relative risk, 14.82; 95% confidence interval, 10.54-20.83). With normal ultrasound measurements, bleeding was not associated with increased spontaneous abortion risk (relative risk: 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.78] in gestational week 6 and 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.74] in gestational week 7), and the live birth rate was comparable with that in patients with normal ultrasound measurements and no bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of infertility who present after embryo transfer with symptoms of vaginal bleeding should be evaluated with a pregnancy ultrasound to accurately assess spontaneous abortion risk. In the setting of normal ultrasound measurements, patients can be reassured that their risk of spontaneous abortion is not increased and that their live birth rate is not decreased.

Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols

Background

Recently POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) classification was proposed to categorize patients with expected poor response to conventional stimulation. Searching for the ideal management of poor responders in IVF is still an active research area.

Aims

This study compares GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist short protocols in ICSI cycles for the POSEIDON-4 group.

Settings and Design

This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary infertility unit between January 2016 and December 2020.

Materials and Methods

Infertile women who met the criteria for POSEIDON 4 group and underwent fresh ICSI-ET in using GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist short protocols was performed. POSEIDON-4 includes patients ≥ 35 years with poor ovarian reserve markers; AFC < 5 and AMH < 1.2 ng/ml.

Statistical Analysis Used

Numerical variables were compared between both groups by student's t test and Mann Whitney test when appropriate. Chi-square test used to compare categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to adjust for the effect of the different study confounders on live birth rate.

Results

One hundred ninety fresh ICSI cycles were analyzed. Of the total cohort, 41.6 % (79) patients pursued antagonist protocol compared to 58.4% (111) underwent short agonist protocol. Fresh embryo transfer was accomplished in 55.7 % (44/79) vs. 61.3 % (68/111), P = 0.44 in antagonist vs. short protocol respectively. Cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response was encountered in (32.9%vs. 27.9%, P = 0.50) in the antagonist and short groups, whereas no good-quality embryos were developed after ovum pickup in 11.4% vs. 10.8%, P>0.05. Comparable total gonadotropins dose, number of retrieved and mature oocytes, and good-quality embryos were found in both groups. Likewise, clinical pregnancy rate was not different for the antagonist and short groups [11/79 (13.9%) vs. 20/111 (18%), P = 0.45]. The live birth rate was comparable between both groups (8.9% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.659) for antagonist and short groups respectively. No significant impact for the protocol type on live birth rate was revealed after adjusting to cycle confounders in multivariate analysis (OR: 0.439, 95%CI 0.134-1.434, P = 0.173).

Conclusion

This study shows comparable pregnancy outcomes for antagonist and short-agonist protocols in IVF/ICSI cycles for POSEIDON-4 category.

Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of manifold ovarian stimulation protocols for patients with poor ovarian response.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were systematically searched until February 14, 2021. Primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate per initiating cycle and low risk of cycle cancellation. Secondary outcomes included number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes, number of embryos obtained, number of transferred embryos, endometrial thickness on triggering day and estradiol (E2) level on triggering day. The network plot, league table, rank probabilities and forest plot of each outcome measure were drawn. Therapeutic effects were displayed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included 15 trials on 2173 participants with poor ovarian response. Delayed start GnRH antagonist was the best regimen in terms of clinical pregnancy rate per initiating cycle (74.04% probability of being the optimal), low risk of cycle cancellation (75.30%), number of oocytes retrieved (68.67%), number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes (97.98%) and endometrial thickness on triggering day (81.97%), while for E2 level on triggering day, microdose GnRH agonist (99.25%) was the most preferred. Regarding number of embryos obtained and number of transferred embryos, no statistical significances were found between different ovarian stimulation protocols.

CONCLUSION

Delayed start GnRH antagonist and microdose GnRH agonist were the two superior regimens in the treatment of poor ovarian response, providing favorable clinical outcomes. Future investigation is needed to confirm and enrich our findings.

Antimüllerian hormone is not associated with embryo ploidy in patients with and without infertility undergoing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and embryo ploidy rates in 2 cohorts of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): the general population of women pursuing IVF with PGT-A (Infertile cohort) and women pursuing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) owing to the risk of hereditary monogenic diseases (Non-infertile cohort).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic center.

PATIENT(S)

Patients undergoing their first cycle of IVF with trophectoderm biopsy and PGT-A or PGT-A and PGT-M in our center between March 2012 and June 2020. Patients of advanced maternal age according to the Bologna criteria (age ≥40 years) and patients who underwent fresh embryo transfers were excluded.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Proportion of euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid embryos per cycle.

RESULT(S)

"Infertile" (n = 926) and "Non-infertile" (n = 214) patients were stratified on the basis of AMH levels, with low-AMH defined as <1.1 ng/mL in accordance with the Bologna criteria. Age-adjusted regression models showed no relationship between AMH classification and proportion of euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid embryos in the Infertile or Non-infertile cohorts. In the Infertile cohort, no association between AMH classification and embryo ploidy rates was identified in a subgroup analysis of patients aged <35 years, 35-37 years, and 38-39 years. These findings persisted in a sensitivity analysis of infertile patients stratified into AMH (ng/mL) quartile categories.

CONCLUSION(S)

No association was found between AMH and the proportion of euploid, mosaic, or aneuploid embryos in 2 large cohorts of patients undergoing IVF with PGT-A (Infertile patients) or PGT-A and PGT-M (Non-infertile patients), suggesting that a quantitative depletion of ovarian reserve does not predict the ploidy status of the embryo cohort.

Letrozole-induced endometrial preparation improved the pregnancy outcomes after frozen blastocyst transfer compared to the natural cycle: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Letrozole treatment is considered an effective option in endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfers in patients with ovulation disorders or irregular menstruation; however, the effectiveness of letrozole-induced endometrial preparation remains unclear in ovulatory patients. Furthermore, there is no comparative study reporting on pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies after frozen embryo transfers comparing natural and letrozole-assisted cycles. This study examined whether letrozole-induced endometrial preparation affected pregnancy outcomes, perinatal outcomes, and congenital anomalies after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers (SVBTs) in ovulatory patients, as compared with the natural cycle.

Methods

This historic cohort study included only patients with unexplained infertility. Overall, 14,611 patients who underwent SVBTs between July 2015 and June 2020, comprising both natural and letrozole-assisted cycles, were included. Multiple covariates that impact outcomes were used for propensity score matching; 1,911 patients in the letrozole group were matched to 12,700 patients in the natural group, and the clinical records of 1,910 patients in each group were retrospectively analysed. Cycle characteristics, pregnancy outcomes (clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth), and incidence of pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies were statistically compared between the two groups.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that letrozole administration during SVBT cycles significantly improved the live birth rate (P = 0.0355). Gestational age, birth length, birth weight, and infant sex, as well as the incidence of pregnancy complications and birth defects, were statistically comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the perinatal outcomes were not affected by letrozole-induced endometrial preparation.

Conclusions

Letrozole-induced endometrial preparation improved the live birth rate compared with the natural cycle, without adverse effects on perinatal outcomes and congenital anomalies after SVBTs. Therefore, letrozole-induced endometrial preparation might be a safe and more effective strategy, especially for patients with insufficient luteal function.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05174-0.

The impact of estradiol on pregnancy outcomes in letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycles

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of low estradiol (E2) levels in letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

University-affiliated fertility center.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent letrozole-stimulated FET cycles from January 2017 to April 2020 (n = 217). The "Low E2" group was defined as those with E2 serum levels on the day of trigger <10th percentile level (E2 <91.16 pg/mL, n = 22) and the "Normal E2" group was defined as those with E2 serum levels ≥10th percentile level (E2 ≥91.16 pg/mL, n = 195).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pregnancy outcomes including rates of clinical pregnancy, clinical miscarriage, and live birth. Neonatal outcomes including gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and Apgar score.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD estradiol level was 66.8 ± 14.8 pg/mL for the "Low E2" group compared with 366.3 ± 322.1 pg/mL for the "Normal E2" group. There were otherwise no substantial differences in cycle characteristics such as endometrial thickness on the day of ovulation trigger and progesterone levels in early pregnancy. The "Low E2" group had a significantly higher clinical miscarriage rate (36.4% vs. 8.8%, adjusted odds ratio 8.06) and lower live birth rate (31.8% vs. 57.9%, adjusted odds ratio 0.28). Neonatal outcomes such as gestational age at delivery, mean birth weight, Apgar scores, and incidence of newborn complications were not clinically different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Low E2 levels were associated with a significantly higher miscarriage rate and lower live birth rate, suggesting that E2 levels in the follicular phase may have an effect on cycle outcomes. Given the rise in use of FET, further studies are needed to confirm our findings and understand the mechanisms.

Length of estradiol exposure >100 pg/ml in the follicular phase affects pregnancy outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Do the length of follicular phase estradiol exposure and the total length of the follicular phase affect pregnancy and live birth outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

An estradiol level >100 pg/ml for ≤4 days including the LH surge day is associated with worse pregnancy and live birth outcomes; however, the total length of the follicular phase is not associated with pregnancy and live birth outcomes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

An estradiol level that increases above 100 pg/ml and continues to increase is indicative of the selection and development of a dominant follicle. In programmed FET cycles, a limited duration of follicular phase estradiol of <9 days results in worse pregnancy rates, but a prolonged exposure to follicular phase estradiol for up to 4 weeks does not affect pregnancy outcomes. It is unknown how follicular phase characteristics affect pregnancy outcomes in natural FET cycles.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective cohort study included infertile patients in an academic hospital setting who underwent their first natural frozen autologous Day-5 embryo transfer cycle in our IVF clinic between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Donor oocyte and gestational carrier cycles were excluded.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The primary outcomes of this study were pregnancy and live birth rates. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the cohorts' median number of days from the estradiol level of >100 pg/ml before the LH surge: Group 1 (≤4 days; n = 1052 patients) and Group 2 (>4 days; n = 839 patients). Additionally, patients were stratified into two groups based on the cohorts' median cycle day of LH surge: Group 1 (follicular length ≤15 days; n = 1287 patients) and Group 2 (follicular length >15 days; n = 1071 patients). A subgroup analysis of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) embryo transfer cycles was performed. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted a priori for patient age, number of embryos transferred, and use of PGT-A, was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the length of elevated estradiol analysis, the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was statistically significantly lower in patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of ≤4 days (65.6%) compared to patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of >4 days (70.9%; OR 1.30 (95% CI 1.06-1.58)). The live birth rate per embryo transfer was also statistically significantly lower in patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of ≤4 days (46.6%) compared to patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of >4 days (52.0%; OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.02-1.48)). In the follicular phase length analysis, the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was similar between patients with a follicular length of ≤15 days (65.4%) and patients with a follicular length of >15 days (69.0%; OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.33)): the live birth rate was also similar between groups (45.5% vs 51.5%, respectively; OR 1.14 (95% CI 0.97-1.35)). In all analyses, once a pregnancy was achieved, the length of the follicular phase or the length of elevated oestradiol >100 pg/ml no longer affected the pregnancy outcomes.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The retrospective design of this study is subject to possible selection bias in regard to which patients at our clinic were recommended to undergo a natural FET compared to a fresh embryo transfer or programmed FET. To decrease the heterogeneity of our study population, we only included patients who had blastocyst embryo transfers; therefore, it is unknown whether similar results would be observed in patients with cleavage-stage embryo transfers. The retrospective nature of the study design did not allow randomized to a specific ovarian stimulation or ovulation trigger protocol. However, all patients were managed with the standardized protocols at a single center, which strengthens the external validity of our results when compared to a study that only evaluates one specific stimulation protocol.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our observations provide cycle-level characteristics that can be applied during a natural FET cycle to help optimize embryo transfer success rates. Physicians should consider the parameter of number of days that oestradiol is >100 pg/ml prior to the LH surge when determining whether to proceed with embryo transfer in a natural cycle. This cycle-specific characteristic may also help to provide an explanation for some failed transfer cycles. Importantly, our findings should not be used to determine whether to recommend a natural or a programmed FET cycle for a patient, but rather, to identify natural FET cycles that are not optimal to proceed with embryo transfer.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No financial support, funding, or services were obtained for this study. The authors do not report any potential conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Body mass index is not associated with embryo ploidy in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and embryo aneuploidy and mosaicism in a cohort of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using next-generation sequencing technology.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing their first IVF cycle with trophectoderm biopsy and PGT-A at our center between January 1, 2017, and August 31, 2020. Patients classified as underweight on the basis of BMI (BMI <18.5 kg/m²) and patients who underwent fresh embryo transfers were excluded.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number and proportion of aneuploid, mosaic, and euploid embryos.

RESULTS

The patients were stratified according to the World Health Organization's BMI classification: normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m², n = 1,254), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m², n = 351), and obese (≥30 kg/m², n = 145). Age-adjusted regression models showed no relationship between BMI classification and the number or proportion of aneuploid embryos. There were no statistically significant associations between BMI classifications and the number or proportion of mosaic or euploid embryos. A subgroup analysis of patients classified into age groups of <35, 35-40, and >40 years similarly showed no relationships between BMI and embryo ploidy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Body mass index was not associated with the number or proportion of aneuploid, mosaic, or euploid embryos in this large cohort of patients undergoing IVF with PGT-A, suggesting that the negative effect of excess weight on reproductive outcomes was independent of the ploidy status of the embryo cohort.

Live birth outcomes in infertile patients with class III and class IV obesity following fresh embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

Assess the effect of class III (body mass index [BMI, kg/m2] 40-49.9) and class IV obesity (≥ 50) on clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes after first oocyte retrieval and fresh embryo transfer cycle.

DESIGN

Cohort study SETTING: Academic center PATIENTS: Patients undergoing their first oocyte retrieval with planned fresh embryo transfer in our clinic between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2018. Patients were stratified by BMI: 18.5-24.9 (n = 4913), 25-29.9 (n = 1566) 30-34.9 (n = 559), 35-39.9 (n = 218), and ≥ 40 (n = 114).

INTERVENTION

None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Live birth rate RESULTS: Following embryo transfer, there were no differences in pregnancy rates across all BMI groups (p value, linear trend = 0.86). However among pregnant patients, as BMI increased, a significant trend of a decreased live birth rate was observed (p value, test for linear trend = 0.004). Additionally, as BMI increased, a significant trend of an increased miscarriage rate was observed (p value, linear trend = < 0.001). Compared to the normal-weight cohort, women with a BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly higher rate of cancelled fresh transfers after retrieval (18.4% vs. 8.2%, OR 2.51; 95%CI 1.55-4.08). Among singleton deliveries, a significant trend of an increased c-section rate was identified as the BMI increased (p value, linear trend = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients with a BMI > 40 have worse IVF treatment outcomes compared to normal-weight patients. After embryo transfer, their pregnancy rate is comparable to normal-weight women; however, their miscarriage rate is higher, leading to a lower live birth rate for pregnant women in this population. Patients with a BMI > 40 have a c-section rate that is 50% higher than normal-weight patients.

Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in mildly and significantly underweight women undergoing IVF

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the impact of low body mass index (BMI) on live birth rates and obstetric outcomes in infertile women treated with IVF and fresh embryo transfer?

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of infertile patients in an academic hospital setting who underwent their first oocyte retrieval with planned autologous fresh embryo transfer between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018. The primary study outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were IVF treatment and delivery outcomes. Underweight patients were stratified into a significantly underweight group (body mass index [BMI] <17.5 kg/m²) and a mildly underweight group (BMI 17.5-18.49 kg/m²), and were compared with a normal-weight group (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²).

RESULTS

A total of 5229 patients were included (significantly underweight, 76; mildly underweight, 231; normal weight, 4922), resulting in 4798 embryo transfers. After oocyte retrieval, there were no significant differences between groups for total oocytes, mature oocyte yield and number of supernumerary blastocysts cryopreserved. Among women who had an embryo transfer, there were no significant differences in the live birth rates in significantly (31.0%, odds ratio [OR] 0.67, confidence interval [0.95, CI] 0.40-1.13) and mildly (37.7%, OR 0.95, CI 0.73-1.33) underweight patients compared with normal-weight patients (35.9%). Additionally, there were no statistically significant increased risks of preterm delivery, Caesarean delivery or a low birthweight (<2500 g) neonate.

CONCLUSIONS

Mildly and significantly underweight infertile women have similar pregnancy and live birth rates to normal-weight patients after IVF treatment. In addition, underweight patients do not have an increased risk of preterm delivery (<37 weeks), Caesarean delivery or a low birthweight neonate.

Delay in IVF treatment up to 180 days does not affect pregnancy outcomes in women with diminished ovarian reserve

STUDY QUESTION

Will a delay in initiating IVF treatment affect pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A delay in IVF treatment up to 180 days does not affect the live birth rate for women with diminished ovarian reserve when compared to women who initiate IVF treatment within 90 days of presentation.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In clinical practice, treatment delays can occur due to medical, logistical or financial reasons. Over a period of years, a gradual decline in ovarian reserve occurs which can result in declining outcomes in response to IVF treatment over time. There is disagreement among reproductive endocrinologists about whether delaying IVF treatment for a few months can negatively affect patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective cohort study of infertile patients in an academic hospital setting with diminished ovarian reserve who started an IVF cycle within 180 days of their initial consultation and underwent an oocyte retrieval with planned fresh embryo transfer between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Diminished ovarian reserve was defined as an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) <1.1 ng/ml. In total, 1790 patients met inclusion criteria (1115 immediate and 675 delayed treatment). Each patient had one included cycle and no subsequent data from additional frozen embryo transfer cycles were included. Since all cycle outcomes evaluated were from fresh embryo transfers, no genetically tested embryos were included. Patients were grouped by whether their cycle started 1-90 days after presentation (immediate) or 91-180 days (delayed). The primary outcome was live birth (≥24 weeks of gestation). A subgroup analysis of more severe forms of diminished ovarian reserve was performed to evaluate outcomes for patients with an AMH <0.5 and for patients >40 years old with an AMH <1.1 ng/ml (Bologna criteria for diminished ovarian reserve). Logistic regression analysis, adjusted a priori for patient age, was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI. All pregnancy outcomes were additionally adjusted for the number of embryos transferred.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The mean ± SD number of days from presentation to IVF start was 50.5 ± 21.9 (immediate) and 128.8 ± 25.9 (delayed). After embryo transfer, the live birth rate was similar between groups (immediate: 23.9%; delayed: 25.6%; OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85-1.38). Additionally, a similar live birth rate was observed in a subgroup analysis of patients with an AMH <0.5 ng/ml (immediate: 18.8%; delayed: 19.1%; OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65-1.51) and in patients >40 years old with an AMH <1.1 ng/ml (immediate: 12.3%; delayed: 14.7%; OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.77-1.91).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

There is the potential for selection bias with regard to the patients who started their IVF cycle within 90 days compared to 91-180 days after initial consultation. In addition, we did not include patients who were seen for initial evaluation but did not progress to IVF treatment with oocyte retrieval; therefore, our results should only be applied to patients with diminished ovarian reserve who complete an IVF cycle. Finally, since we excluded patients who started their IVF cycle greater than 180 days from their first visit, it is not known how such a delay in treatment affects pregnancy outcomes in IVF cycles.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

A delay in initiating IVF treatment in patients with diminished ovarian reserve up to 180 days from the initial visit does not affect pregnancy outcomes. This observation remains true for patients who are in the high-risk categories for poor response to ovarian stimulation. Providers and patients should be reassured that when a short-term treatment delay is deemed necessary for medical, logistic or financial reasons, treatment outcomes will not be affected.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No financial support, funding or services were obtained for this study. The authors do not report any potential conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of mild ovarian stimulation protocol and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol for poor ovarian response (POR) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

METHODS

This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2013 to September 2015, including 191 patients who met the Bologna criteria of POR. Ninety-seven patients allocated to the mild ovarian stimulation group (MS group) were stimulated according to the letrozole/antagonist protocol, while 94 patients in the controlled ovarian stimulation group (COS group) were stimulated according to a high dose of gonadotropin (Gn) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) stop protocol. The cumulative live birth rate was the primary outcome. Chinese clinical trial number ChiCTR-TRC-13003454.

RESULTS

Comparing with the COS group, both the stimulation duration and the total gonadotropin dose were significantly shorter and lower in the MS group (P < 0.001). A higher number of retrieved oocytes (P = 0.003) and transferrable embryos (P = 0.029) were obtained in the COS group. The cumulative live birth rates (OR 1.103; 95% CI 0.53 to 2.28; P = 0.791) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase of Gn dose during ovulation stimulation was associated with a higher number of transferrable embryos for POR patients, but this increase did not lead to a concomitant improvement of reproductive outcome, especially in terms of the cumulative live birth rate. Using a mild stimulation protocol was economically preferential while it was as effective as higher doses of Gn stimulation protocol in reproductive outcome for POR patients.

The effects of letrozole on women with endometriosis undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization

This study aimed to analyze the effects of a new protocol with letrozole on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in women with endometriosis. This retrospective cohort study was conducted for women diagnosed with endometriosis undergoing IVF from an infertility clinic. A new protocol, combination therapy with letrozole and gonadotropin, was used from August 2016 to January 2018 ('protocol 1', n = 38). From March 2014 to July 2016, conventional IVF with gonadotropin was administered ('protocol 2', n = 26). Age and ovarian reserve were comparable between the two groups. The patients who received protocol 1 resulted in a significantly lower peak estradiol level in IVF compared with those received protocol 2 (722 ± 1076 pg/mL versus 2168 ± 1521 pg/mL, p < .001). The length of stimulation, the total dose of gonadotropin, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rates, and number of embryos obtained were similar between the two groups. The mean percentage of mature oocytes was lower (69.9 ± 23.7% versus 80.2 ± 21.0%, p = .029) in patients with protocol 1. While maintaining low estrogen levels, the combination therapy with letrozole and gonadotropin produce similar oocyte and embryo yield to the conventional IVF protocol in women with endometriosis.

Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist microdose flare-up and GnRH agonist flare-up protocols among women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial study among 131 women with poor ovarian reserve who underwent ICSI cycles at a single center in Tehran, Iran, between September 2008 and May 2014. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either the microdose flare-up (n=66) or flare-up (n=65) protocol. The primary outcome measure was live birth rate.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in cycle cancellation, mean number of dominant follicles, retrieved oocytes, and metaphase II oocytes. Number of stimulation days (P=032) and endometrial thickness (P=0.001) were significantly higher, and gonadotropin dose was non-significantly higher (P=0.075) in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group. No difference in clinical pregnancy, implantation, or abortion rate was observed between the two protocols. Live birth was higher in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group (P=0.036).

CONCLUSION

The microdose flare-up protocol seemed to be superior to the flare-up protocol, but it required a higher dose of gonadotropins and a longer duration of stimulation. Further prospective clinical trials of the microdose flare-up protocol are recommended. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01006954.

Letrozole as co-treatment agent in ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol in poor responders: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Background

Ovarian stimulation (OS) for poor ovarian response (POR) patients is still a major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques. Aromatase inhibitors as co-treatment in antagonist protocol are suggested to these patients, but there are controversial reports.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness Letrozole (LZ) as adjuvant treatment in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol in POR patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Materials and Methods

This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in Arash women's hospital. One hundred sixty infertile women with POR based on Bologna criteria were allocated into two groups randomly: LZ + GnRH-antagonist (LA) and placebo + GnRH-antagonist (PA) groups. In the experimental group, the patients received 5 mg LZ on the first five days of OS with 150 IU of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and 150 IUof human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG). The cycle outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

The total number of retrieved oocytes and the metaphase II oocytes in LA-treated group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p = 0.008, p = 0.002). The dosage of hMG used and the duration of OS and antagonist administration in LZ-treated group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The number of patients with no oocyte, in the control group, was higher than the LZ-treated group, and the clinical pregnancy rate in LA-treated group (25%) was higher than the control group (18%); however, the differences were not significant statistically.

Conclusion

Adding 5 mg of LZ to rFSH/hMG antagonist protocol may improve the in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injectioncycle outcome in POR patients.

Letrozole supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation in expected high responders: a pilot randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Almost all of the previous studies related with co-administration of letrozole in IVF cycles were performed in poor responders and letrozole may reduce the total gonadotropin dose required for ovarian stimulation, and the pregnancy rate did not decrease in poor responders. This study aimed to assess whether high responders co-treatment with letrozole reduced supraphysiological late follicular phase estradiol levels and the incidence of premature progesterone elevated at the end of the follicular phase, thereby impacting positively on endometrial receptivity.

METHODS

A randomized parallel controlled study in a university-affiliated center include 130 high responders between October 2015 and August 2016. The patients were randomized on the first stimulation day of the IVF cycle and from stimulation day 5 receive letrozole (group A) or without letrozole treatment (group B).

RESULTS

Although estradiol levels were significantly lower in the letrozole group (group A) (P < 0.001), progesterone elevation (> 1.5 ng/mL was considered as a rise) on the day of hCG triggering (15.4, 7.7%) was not statistically significant (P = 0.170). RecFSH, the recovery rate of eggs, the high-quality embryo rate, and the thickness of endometrium (P = 0.776) were similar between the letrozole group(group A) and control groups (group B). Clinical pregnancy rates were 53.1% (26/49) and 72.9% (35/48) in the letrozole and control groups, respectively, with a statistical significance (P = 0.043).Live birth rates were 42.9% (21/49) and 62.5% (30/48),showed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.053). The miscarriage rate did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, letrozole supplementation could not reduce the incidence of premature progesterone rise during the late follicular phase in stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles in expected high responders, producing a harmful effect on the pregnancy outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

China Clinical Trial Registration Center: ChiCTR-IPR-15006211 URL of the trial registry record: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=10731 . Trial registration date: 8 April, 2015. Date of first patient's enrolment: 5 October, 2015.

Effect of letrozole added to gonadotropins in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the yield and maturity of retrieved oocytes

We aimed to evaluate the effect of co-administration of letrozole and gonadotropins during ovarian stimulation on oocyte yield and maturation in breast cancer patients prior to chemotherapy. A retrospective cohort design was used comparing oocyte cryopreservation cycles among patients with breast cancer patients with other oncological indications and women undergoing elective oocyte cryopreservation. All patients were treated with GnRH antagonist protocol using GnRH agonist for final oocyte maturation. The breast cancer group was additionally treated with letrozole (5 mg/d) from the first day of treatment until the day of oocyte retrieval. The cohort included 418 patients: 145 breast cancer patients, 168 with other oncological indications, and 105 patients who chose to undergo elective oocyte cryopreservation. There were no significant differences among the groups in the number of retrieved oocytes or proportion of mature oocytes. On multivariate linear regression models, co-treatment with letrozole was not a significant factor for the number of retrieved oocytes or for oocyte maturation rate after controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), and FSH dose. We conclude that the addition of letrozole to gonadotropins does not increase the number of oocytes retrieved or the oocyte maturation rate.

Double mild stimulation and egg collection in the same cycle for management of poor ovarian responders

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases in women with poor ovarian response (POR) in in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles.

BASIC PROCEDURES

This prospective clinical study was performed in Royan Institute from October 2014 to January 2016. 121 patients were diagnosed as POR on the basis of Bologna criteria were included. Double stimulations were performed during the follicular and luteal phases by Letrozole, Clomid, hMG and GnRH-agonist. The patients' present cycle outcomes were compared with those of the previous cycle results using appropriate statistical tests.

MAIN FINDING

The total of 104 (85.9%) patients completed the stimulation stages. The analysis revealed the number of retrieved oocytes after the first and second stimulations did not differ (P = 0.2); however, the fertilization rate and the number of frozen embryos after the first stimulation were significantly higher than those of in the second stimulation (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03), indicating the better quality of retrieved oocytes after the first stimulation. The mean number of MII oocytes and the fertilization rate after Shanghai protocol were higher than those of the previous antagonist protocol with a substantial trend toward significance (P = 0.06), which can be clinically important. The cancellation rate (33%) due to no ovarian response and no embryo formation was still high in these patients.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION

Since the intensity of stimulation in both stages was mild, this protocol can be considered a time-efficient and patient friendly regime; however, more studies are required with emphasis on its cost-effectiveness.

Outcomes of poor responders following growth hormone co-treatment with IVF/ICSI mild stimulation protocol: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

No research has studied the effect of GH co-treatment in mild stimulation protocol for poor responders. We therefore conducted this retrospective analysis to assess the outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles after the adjunct GH use to the mild stimulation protocol in poor responders.

METHODS

132 poor responders who received mild stimulation protocol at Reproductive Medicine Center of Changzheng Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were included in this study. Good-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were compared between the GH group (n = 61) and control group (n = 71).

RESULTS

IVF good-quality embryo rate (68.1 versus 51.5%; P = 0.008*) and ICSI good-quality embryo rate (53.9 versus 36.7%; P = 0.045*) was significantly higher in the GH group. Though the clinical outcomes did not reach a statistically significant difference between the two groups due to the limited sample size, there was a trend of higher rate in GH group in the aspect of clinical pregnancy rate (52.4 versus 47.1%; P = 0.609) and live birth rate (35.7 versus 27.5%; P = 0.392).

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that the adjuvant GH treatment in mild stimulation protocol for poor responders could significantly improve good-quality embryo rate, and might therefore improve the clinical outcomes.

In vitro fertilization treatments with the use of clomiphene citrate or letrozole

There has been increasing interest in combining the oral agents clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole with gonadotropins in IVF: for poor responders to reduce the amount of gonadotropins used, and in normal responders to reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation (OHSS). In normal responders, mild stimulation with the use of CC and gonadotropins was found to decrease the number of oocytes retrieved and result in good pregnancy rates, but in most studies the cumulative pregnancy rate was lower compared with conventional ovarian stimulation when frozen embryo transfers were considered. Coadministration of letrozole and gonadotropins has mainly been used in patients with breast cancer to prevent the massive elevation of serum E₂ concentrations with the use of standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. CC and letrozole have both been used with gonadotropins in poor responders and have been shown to reduce the amount of gonadotropin used without reducing the pregnancy rate. Letrozole use with gonadotropins in IVF cycles may increase endometrial receptivity by increasing integrin expression in the endometrium and by lowering estrogen concentrations to more physiologic levels.

Recent advances in in vitro fertilization

The field of assisted reproductive technology is rapidly progressing with many new advances in the last decade. The present review discusses methods to improve oocyte quality in older women and new stimulation protocols that may improve the number of mature oocytes retrieved during an in vitro fertilization cycle. We will discuss the present use of pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) and finally focus on some new methods to determine endometrial receptivity. The focus of this review is to point out areas of technology that may be controversial or are new enough to require proper controlled studies for validation.

What are the likely IVF/ICSI outcomes if there is a discrepancy between serum AMH and FSH levels? A multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The principal outcome was to assess the ovarian response to controlled hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without micro-injection (ICSI) in patients whom ovarian reserve testing revealed a discrepancy between the serum levels of FSH and AMH. The secondary outcome was to determine whether AMH and FSH profiles could predict the IVF/ICSI response.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter, retrospective study analysing all controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles with attempted fresh embryo transfer(s) carried out during IVF/ICSI treatment and in which the AMH level had been assayed between January 01, 2008 and December 31, 2011. This enabled us to form 2 control groups (NOR, normal ovarian reserve: normal AMH and FSH and DOR, diminished ovarian reserve: diminished AMH, increased FSH) and 2 study groups (DAMH: diminished AMH, normal FSH and NAMH: normal AMH, increased FSH). The principal assessment criterion was quantitative ovarian response to stimulation defined by the mean number of oocytes punctured, the secondary assessment criterion the qualitative response to stimulation defined by the pregnancy rate per cycle.

RESULTS

We were able to analyse 1803 stimulation cycles. The mean number of oocytes punctured was significantly reduced in the DAMH and DOR groups compared to the NAMH and NOR groups (5.2±3.9 and 4.1±3.3 vs. 11.5±7 and 9.5±5.6, respectively [P<0.01]). The pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was significantly reduced in the DAMH and DOR groups compared to the NAMH and NOR groups (20% and 24% vs. 32 and 35%, respectively [P<0.01]). Live birth rates did not differ between the groups however. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression revealed that AMH, FSH and age independently had an effect on the number of oocytes punctured, although the effect exerted by AMH seemed to be preponderant (OR: 2.75: 95%CI [2.39-3.19]). AMH appeared to be the sole factor independently predictive of pregnancy per cycle.

CONCLUSION

The serum AMH level appears to provide an additional item of discriminatory information, which should not be overlooked. Ovarian reserve work-up should include routine AMH assay.

Live birth rates in various subgroups of poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria

The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology published Bologna criteria to generate a definition of poor ovarian responders (PORs). However, there are few data on whether PORs are homogenous for ovarian response or live birth rates (LBRs). In this retrospective study, 821 patients fulfilling Bologna criteria and undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection were stratified into four groups: Group A: female age ≥40 with a previous poor response (cycle cancelled or ≤3 oocytes) (105 patients, 123 cycles); Group B: female age ≥40 with an antral follicle count (AFC) < 7 (159 patients, 253 cycles); Group C: AFC <7 with a previous poor response (350 patients, 575 cycles); and Group D: female age ≥40 with an AFC <7 and previous poor response (207 patients, 306 cycles). Cluster data analysis was performed. Although median number of oocytes was higher in Group B (P < 0.001), higher implantation (P = 0.024) and LBR per embryo transfer (P < 0.001) or cycle (P = 0.001) were noted in Group C. We conclude that, once a patient fulfils Bologna criteria, prognosis is poor, with fewer than 10% recorded LBRs per cycle. However, the LBRs are not homogenous and 'young proven' PORs have the most favourable pregnancy outcome.

GnRH antagonist and letrozole co-treatment in diminished ovarian reserve patients: a proof-of-concept study

The current study aimed to investigate the effects of luteal gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist pretreatment on the outcomes of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) patients who were treated using a FSH/letrozole/GnRH antagonist (FLA) protocol. Thus, patients who had luteal GnRH antagonist pretreatment (AFLA) prior to stimulation were compared to patients who had the FLA protocol, only. An electronic database was used to identify patients and stimulation characteristics. Women who had a total antral follicle count (AFC) of <7 were included in the analysis. A total of 45 cycles using luteal GnRH antagonist pretreatment in combination with a letrozole/GnRH antagonist (AFLA) protocol were compared to 76 cycles using a FLA protocol, only. The total gonadotropin dose, duration of stimulation, and peak estradiol levels were comparable between the groups (p>0.05). However, the AFLA group had significantly more metaphase-2 (MII) oocytes (p=0.009), a higher oocyte maturity rate (MII/total oocytes) (p=0.029), and a higher mature oocyte yield (MII/AFC) (p=0.020) with more cleaved embryos (p=0.036), and a significantly reduced number of canceled cycles (26.7% vs. 44.7%; p=0.048). The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 22.2% vs. 13.2% (p=0.195) in the AFLA and FLA groups, respectively. Interestingly, a subgroup analysis including ESHRE Bologna criteria poor responder patients showed that the luteal administration of GnRH antagonist resulted in better outcomes when compared with the FLA protocol alone. In conclusion, luteal GnRH antagonist pretreatment improves ovarian stimulation parameters and reproductive outcomes in poor ovarian reserve IVF patients.

Luteal-phase protocol in poor ovarian response: a comparative study with an antagonist protocol

Objective

This retrospective study compared the effect of the luteal phase ovarian stimulation protocol (LP group) with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol (AN group) in women with poor ovarian responses.

Methods

Ovarian stimulation was initiated with 225 IU of human gonadotrophin (hMG) daily. When the dominant follicle diameter exceeded 13 mm, 0.25 mg of a GnRH antagonist was used daily until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration in the AN group. A GnRH antagonist was not used in the LP group. Ovulation was induced with HCG for all patients when at least one follicle reached a diameter of 16 mm or one dominant follicle reached 18 mm. The highest quality embryos were transferred or cryopreserved for later transfer.

Results

From January 2013 to December 2015, 274 women with poor ovarian response were included. A total of 108 patients underwent the luteal phase ovarian stimulation protocol while 166 patients underwent the GnRH antagonist protocol. hMG was used for more total days in the LP group was than in the AN group. Oestradiol levels on the day of HCG administration in the LP group were significantly lower than those in the AN group. The mean number of oocytes retrieved in the LP and AN groups was 3.5 ± 2.5 and 3.5 ± 2.9, respectively. The mean number of embryos of the highest quality was 1.7 ± 1.2 and 1.7 ± 1.5, respectively. The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in the LP and AN groups were 26.2% (22/84) and 25% (29/116), and 15.5% (24/155) and 16.3% (35/215), respectively.

Conclusions

The luteal phase ovarian stimulation protocol can be applied in women with poor ovarian response and attain comparable clinical pregnancy and implantation rates to those of the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Poor ovarian reserve

Poor ovarian reserve (POR) is an important limiting factor for the success of any treatment modality for infertility. It indicates a reduction in quantity and quality of oocytes in women of reproductive age group. It may be age related as seen in advanced years of reproductive life or may occur in young women due to diverse etiological factors. Evaluating ovarian reserve and individualizing the therapeutic strategies are very important for optimizing the success rate. Majority or women with POR need to undergo in vitro fertilization to achieve pregnancy. However, pregnancy rate remains low despite a plethora of interventions and is associated with high pregnancy loss. Early detection and active management are essential to minimize the need for egg donation in these women.

A randomized, single-blind, prospective trial comparing three different gonadotropin doses with or without addition of letrozole during ovulation stimulation in patients with poor ovarian response

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to investigate whether IVF outcomes would differ between patients with POR who received three different gonadotropin doses with or without the addition of letrozole during ovulation stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN

Only those who fulfilled two of the three Bologna criteria were included to the study. 95 patients met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study. In the first group, 31 patients were treated with 450IU gonadotropins. In the second group, 31 patients were treated with 300IU gonadotropins. The third group comprised 33 patients and was treated with 150IU gonadotropins in combination with letrozole.

RESULTS

The results indicate that differences in doses of hMG and rFSH in patients with POR result in a similar number of retrieved MII and fertilized oocytes, similar fertilization rates, number of transferred embryos, implantation, cancelation, chemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the dose of gonadotropins during ovulation stimulation is an intuitively appealing approach when the patient is a poor responder. However, increasing the dose does not necessarily improve the reproductive outcome. Using a mild stimulation with addition of letrozole was as effective as stimulation with higher doses of gonadotropins alone in this patient population.

Comparison of The Effectiveness of Clomiphene Citrate versus Letrozole in Mild IVF in Poor Prognosis Subfertile Women with Failed IVF Cycles

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of clomiphene citrate (CC) vs. letrozole (L) plus human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in poor prognosis women with previous failed ovarian stimulation undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included cycles with CC and L plus hMG/GnRH antagonist protocols of 32 poor responders who had failed to have ideal follicles to be retrieved during oocyte pick-up (OPU) or embryo transfer (ET) at least for 2 previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with microdose flare protocol or GnRH antagonist protocol from January 2006 to December 2009. Main outcome measures were implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle. Duration of stimulation, mean gonadotropin dose used, endometrial thickness, number of mature follicles, serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration, number of retrieved oocytes and fertilization rates were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total number of 42 cycles of 32 severe poor responders were evaluated. Total gonadotropin consumption was significantly lower (1491 ± 873 vs. 2808 ± 1581 IU, P=0.005) and mean E2 level on the day of hCG injection were significantly higher in CC group than L group (443.3 ± 255.2 vs. 255.4 ± 285.2 pg/mL, P=0.03). ET, overall pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle were significantly higher in CC than L protocol (27.2 vs. 15%, 13.6 vs. 0% and 4.5 vs. 0%, respectively, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Severe poor responders who had previously failed to respond to microdose or GnRH antagonist protocols may benefit from CC plus hMG/GnRH antagonist protocol despite high cancellation rate.

The effects of fresh embryo transfers and elective frozen/thawed embryo transfers on pregancy outcomes in poor ovarian responders as defined by the Bologna criteria

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of fresh embryo transfers (ET) and elective frozen/thawed embryo transfers (eFET) on implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates in poor ovarian responders, as defined by the Bologna criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All electronic databases of embryo transfers between January 2011 and January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Two hundred fifty-nine of all the fresh ET and 96 of all eFET were included into the study. An antagonist protocol with letrozole was used for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in all participants.

RESULTS

The mean age was 36.9 years (range, 21-43 years) in the fresh ET arm and 37.2 years (range, 21-43 years) in the eFET arm (p=0.45). The clinical pregnancy rate was 35% (90/259) versus 29% (28/96); the abortion rate was 27% (20/75) versus 36% (9/25); and the live birth rate was 21% (55/259) versus 17% (16/99). There were no significant differences between groups and p values were 0.32, 0.52, and 0.42, respectively. The mean E2 level was 389 (range, 50-2055 pg/mL) in the fresh ET group (on hCG day) and 418 pg/mL (range, 121-3073 pg/mL) in the eFET group (on day 14 of cycle) (p=0.122). No differences were found between the two groups with respect to the total number of retrieved oocytes (p=0.55) and number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes (p=0.81). The number of embryo transfers was statistically different (p=0.005). The effects of age, total number of retrieved oocytes, number of MII oocytes, type of treatment, number of ET, and the day of ET and E2 level to live birth outcomes were investigated using binary logistic regresion analyses, and no stastical effect was determined by any of the parameters. P values were p=0.50, 0.66, 0.45, 0.30, 0.30, 0.08, and 0.90, respectively.

CONCLUSION

E2 levels tend to be lower in poor responders, thus the receptivity of the endometrium may be damaged less than normal, which may explain why pregnancy results are the same between eFET and ET groups.

Comparison of GnRh Agonist Microdose Flare Up and GnRh Antagonist/Letrozole in Treatment of Poor Responder Patients in Intra Cytoplaspic Sperm Injection: Randomized Clinical Trial

Backgrounds:

the prevalence of infertility is up to 10 to 15 % which 9 to 24 % of them are Poor Ovarian Responders (POR). This study was designed to compare two methods of GnRH Agonist Microdose Flareup (MF) and GnRH Antagonist/Letrozole (AL) in treatment of these patients.

Methods and Materials:

this randomized clinical trial study consisted of 123 patients. In the first step of treatment in both methods FSH, LH, estradiol, anderostandion, testestron in third day of menstruation period and the thickness of endometrium by Transvaginal sonography were evaluated. At the time of HCG injection the thickness of endometrium and follicles which were more than 14mm ware established and hormones were evaluated. Two weeks later serum βhCG and after 6 to 8 weeks Transvaginal sonography were applied to prove the pregnancy.

Results:

there were 61 patients with mean age of 38.7±4.58 in MF group and 62 patients with mean age of 38.5±4.6 in AL group (P=0.80). At the time of hCG injection there were significant increase in the level of LH, estradiol, thickness of endometrium and follicles more than 14mm in MF patients (P<0.0001). The mean time of ovary stimulation in MF group was 10.72±1.5 and in AL was 8.45±1.2 (P<0.0001). The mean level of gonadotropin which were used was 80.6±20.1 in MF patients and 64.7±16.4 in AL group (P<0.0001). 18 % of MF group and 38.7% in AL group had no normal cycle of ovulation (OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.25-6.57, P=0.011). The mean numbers of oocyte and normal fetus in MF was 5.83±3.5 and 3.7±2.5 and in AL was 3±1.69 and 1.4±1.33 (P<0.0001). The number of chemical pregnancy in MF group was 10 (16.4%) and in AL was 3 (4.8%) (OR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.06-14.77, P=0.037). Clinical pregnancy in 10 patients (16.4%) of MF group and 3 (4.8%)in AL was reported. OR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.06-14.77, P=0.037).

Conclusion:

this study showed that MF method of pregnancy leads to more positive results in pregnancy based on chemical and clinical evaluation in comparison with AL and is advised for poor responder patients.

The dynamic changes of anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin B during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in decreased ovarian reserve women and the effect on clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the dynamics of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin B (INHB) levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in women with decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), and assess the effect of these dynamic changes on the prediction of clinical outcome in in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

A total of 124 women undergoing IVF cycles were divided into normal ovarian reserve (NOR) and DOR groups. AMH and INHB levels were measured in serum on menstrual cycle day 2 or 3 (D2/3), day 5 of stimulation (D5), hCG day (D-hCG) and follicular fluid (FF) on oocyte retrieval day.

RESULTS

Serum AMH levels were gradually decreased while INHB levels were gradually increased from D2/3 to D-hCG during the COH in both groups. Serum AMH, INHB levels on D2/3 and FF AMH, INHB levels were highly positively correlated with AFC and oocytes retrieval. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that clinical pregnancy did not directly correlate with serum and FF AMH and INHB levels.

CONCLUSION

Serum AMH and INHB levels were not directly related to clinical pregnancy, dynamic serum AMH and IHNB levels were positively correlated with COH outcomes.

Estrogen or anti-estrogen for Bologna poor responders?

The current study aims to compare cycle outcomes of two ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders according to the Bologna criteria; luteal estrogen priming (LE) or letrozole (LZ) co-treatment in antagonist protocol. Following retrospective chart review of a single center, 162 cycles were found eligible for the comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols. After interpreting data, significantly higher serum estradiol levels, longer duration of cycle, higher number of fertilized oocytes and good quality embryos were detected in patients who received LE. Despite any statistical significance, higher clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) per embryo transfer (ET) were detected with LE protocol compared with LZ (12.3% versus 18.2% and 9.6% versus 12.7%, respectively). Younger patients (<40 years) revealed higher CPR and OPR per started cycle compared with older patients (≥40 years) where only OPR was statistically significant. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that basal antral follicle count, peak serum estradiol levels and number of fertilized oocytes were independent variables significantly associated with clinical pregnancies (p < 0.05). In the current analysis, LE or LZ protocols revealed comparable but quite low pregnancy rates in poor responders according to the Bologna criteria. Younger patients were more likely to achieve pregnancy compared to older patients with both protocols.

Comparison of IVF Outcomes between Minimal Stimulation and High-Dose Stimulation for Patients with Poor Ovarian Reserve

We examined whether treatment with minimum-dose stimulation (MS) protocol enhances clinical pregnancy rates compared to high-dose stimulation (HS) protocol. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing IVF and pregnancy outcomes between MS and HS gonadotropin-antagonist protocol for patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR). Inclusion criteria included patients with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≤8 pmol/L and/or antral follicle count (AFC) ≤5 on days 2-3 of the cycle. Patients from 2008 exclusively had a HS protocol treatment, while patients in 2010 had treatment with a MS protocol exclusively. The MS protocol involved letrozole at 2.5 mg over 5 days, starting from day 2, overlapping with gonadotropins, starting from the third day of letrozole at 150 units daily. GnRH antagonist was introduced once one or more follicles reached 14 mm or larger. The HS group received gonadotropins (≥300 IU/day) throughout their antagonist cycle. Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the MS protocol compared to the HS protocol (P = 0.007). Furthermore, the live birth rate was significantly higher in the MS group compare to the HS group (P = 0.034). In conclusion, the MS IVF protocol is less expensive (lower gonadotropin dosage) and resulted in a higher clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate than a HS protocol for poor responders.

Embryo quality in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in young poor responders

This retrospective matched case control study was conducted to evaluate the effects of poor ovarian response in a group of young women (20-30 years) on embryos quality in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization. Thirty-nine young patients with poor ovarian response (≤5 oocytes on retrieval) were enrolled and compared to age- and date-matched controls. Maximal Estradiol levels, number of oocytes aspirated, number of M2 oocytes and number of fertilized oocytes were significantly lower in the study group compared to controls. Implantation rate and rate of good quality embryos transferred of the study group and control were comparable (15.3 versus 16.3% and 62 versus 67.2%, respectively). Additionally, clinical pregnancy rate per transfer and delivery rate per transfer were also comparable (26.6 versus 35.8% and 23.3 versus 30.7%, respectively). The rate of cycles with no transfer, however, was 23.07% in the study group compared to zero cycles with no transfer in the control group. We conclude that young poor responders may still have reasonable proportion of good quality embryos when compared to controls. This results in comparable implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Cycle transfer cancelation, however, represents a true barrier for achieving pregnancy.

Comparison of estradiol and progesterone priming/antagonist/letrozole and microdose flare-up protocols for poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

BACKGROUND

To compare the effect of the GnRH antagonist/letrozole/gonadotropin protocol with the microdose GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients suspected of having or with a history of poor ovarian response between January 2009 and June 2010, who were undergoing ICSI were enrolled. The microdose flareup (MF) protocol was used in 79 patients and the estradiol + progesterone/letrozole + gonadotropin and GnRH antagonist (EP/ALG) protocol was used in 42 patients.

RESULTS

Age of the patients, duration of infertility, basal FSH, the total gonadotropin consumption, duration of stimulation, E2 level on the day of hCG administration, the number of embryo transferred, the fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and the live birth rate were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Only the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the EP/LGA group (1.7 ± 0.7 versus 2.6 ± 0.6).

CONCLUSION

The EP/LGA protocol has no significant improvement against the microdose flare-up protocol in poor responder patients.

The comparision of effect of microdose GnRH-a flare-up, GnRH antagonist/aromatase inhibitor letrozole and GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate protocols on IVF outcomes in poor responder patients

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of microdose GnRH-a flare-up, GnRH antagonist/aromatase inhibitor letrozole and GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate protocols on IVF outcomes in poor responder patients.

METHODS

Of 225 patients, 83 patients were in microdose flare-up group (Group 1), 70 patients were in GnRH antagonist/letrozole group (Group 2) and 72 patients were in GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate group (Group 3). Demographic and endocrine characteristics, the total number of oocytes retrieved, cancellation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were collected Results: Total dosage of gonadotropins (p=0.002) and serum E2 levels on the day of hCG administration (p=0.010) were significantly higher and duration of stimulations (p=0.03) was significantly longer in group 1. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly greater in group 1 and 2 when compare to those of group 3 (p=0,000). There was a trend towards increasing cycle cancellation rates with GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate and GnRH antagonist/letrozole.

CONCLUSION

Our finding suggest that the results of microdose flare-up protocol are better than other two used treatment protocols, in terms of maximum estradiol levels, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and cancellation rate and it still seems to be superior the ovarian stimulation regime for the poor responder patients.

Effectiveness of the antagonist/letrozole protocol for treating poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In view of the conflicting data regarding the efficacy of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/letrozole (A/L) protocol for treating poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI), this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of the A/L protocol and the microdose GnRH agonist flare up (MF) protocol for such treatment. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for studies comparing the A/L and MF protocols for treating poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI. We retrieved reports of three trials with data for 688 cycles in women. The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly decreased with the A/L compared with MF protocol (RR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57-0.86; p = 0.001), the duration of gonadotrophin stimulation was lower with the A/L than MF protocol (MD -1.25; 95% CI: -2.37 to -0.12; p = 0.03). Moreover, there was no significant difference in cycle cancellation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, and the total dose of gonadotrophin between the two protocols. In conclusions, the clinical pregnancy rate may be lower with the A/L than MF protocol for treating poor responsers undergoing IVF/ICSI, but large-scale randomised controlled trials are needed to assess the A/L protocol.

Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole versus microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI

BACKGROUND

To compare the IVF outcomes of letrozole/antagonist and microdose GnRH agonist flare up protocols in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was performed in patients with one or more previous failed IVF cycles in which four or less oocytes were retrieved when the gonadotrophin starting dose was at least 300 IU/day. Sixty patients were randomized by computer-generated list to receive either letrozole/antagonist (mild stimulation) n = 30 or GnRH-a protocol (microdose flare) n = 30.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar with respect to background and hormonal characteristics (age, duration of infertility, BMI, FSH, LH and E2). The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was similar in both groups (13.3 vs. 16.6%; OR = 0.769; 95% CI = 0.185, 3.198). The doses of used gonadotropins and the number of stimulation days were significantly lower in the letrozole/antagonist protocol. The peak E2 level on the day of hCG, the endometrial thickness, the retrieved oocytes, the number of fertilized oocytes, the number of transferred embryos and the cancellation rate were statistically similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The letrozole/antagonist protocol is a cost-effective and patient-friendly protocol that may be used in poor ovarian responders for IVF/ICSI.

The use of aromatase inhibitors in in vitro fertilization

The use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in IVF patients remains controversial. AIs can be considered for ovulation induction for IVF in women who are normal and poor responders, are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or thrombosis, who have endometriosis, and/or are undergoing fertility preservation procedures as a result of estrogen-dependent cancers, primarily breast and endometrial cancers. Although the biologic plausibility of the capacity of AIs in IVF patients is promising, results should be interpreted with caution, because the efficacy of AIs needs to be proven in randomized trials.

Endometrial receptivity defects during IVF cycles with and without letrozole

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to study ways to improve IVF success rates in women with suspected endometrial receptivity defects.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining the effect of letrozole (aromatase inhibitor) on integrin expression as a marker of endometrial receptivity. We compared IVF outcomes in 97 infertile women who had undergone ανβ3 integrin assessment by immunohistochemistry in mid-luteal endometrial biopsies. Of 79 women undergoing standard IVF, 29 (36.7%) lacked normal integrin expression. Eighteen other women with low integrin were studied after receiving letrozole during early IVF stimulation. An independent set of ανβ3 integrin-negative patients (n = 15) who had undergone repeat endometrial biopsy for integrin testing while taking letrozole were re-evaluated.

RESULTS

Clinical pregnancy and delivery rates were higher in women with normal ανβ3 integrin expression compared with those who were integrin negative [20/50 (40%) versus 4/29 (13.8%); P = 0.02 and 19/50 (38%) versus 2/29 (7%); P < 0.01, respectively]. In 18 women who received letrozole early in IVF, 11 conceived (61.1%; P < 0.001) compared with integrin-negative patients who did not receive letrozole. In integrin-negative women who were rebiopsied on letrozole, 66.7% reverted to normal integrin expression. Positive endometrial aromatase immunostaining using a polyclonal antibody was a common finding in infertile patients compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of endometrial ανβ3 integrin expression is associated with a poor prognosis for IVF that might be improved with letrozole co-treatment. Prospective studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings but the data suggest that aromatase expression may contribute to implantation failure in some women.

Comparison of different stimulation protocols efficacy in poor responders undergoing IVF: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of different stimulation protocols on pregnancy outcomes in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of four different protocols including gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (long, short and miniflare) and GnRH antagonist on pregnancy outcomes in poor responders. This investigation was performed on 566 poor respond patients who were candidates for IVF. Main outcome measures included the total number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rates, implantation and overall cancellation rates which were compared between four mentioned groups.

RESULTS

Number of follicles >18 mm on hCG day were significantly higher in GnRH-a long versus GnRH antagonist, GnRH-a short and GnRH-a miniflare protocols. The mean number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved were significantly higher in GnRH-a long versus miniflare (4.7 ± 3.05 versus 3.26 ± 2.9 and 3.69 ± 3.1 versus 2.65 ± 2.2, respectively). There were no significant differences in implantation, pregnancy and overall cancellation rates between four groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that the application of four different protocols in poor respond patients seem to have similar efficacy in improving clinical outcomes such as implantation, pregnancy rates and cancellation rate even though GnRH-a long protocol yielded more retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes compared to GnRH-a miniflare protocol.

Extended high dose letrozole regimen versus short low dose letrozole regimen as an adjuvant to gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extended high dose letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHant) protocol with short low dose letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 136 women who responded poorly to GnRH agonist long protocol in their first IVF cycle were randomized into two equal groups using computer generated list and were treated in the second IVF cycle by either extended letrozole regimen (5 mg/day during the first 5 days of cycle and 2.5 mg/day during the subsequent 3 days) combined with HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol or short letrozole regimen (2.5 mg/day from cycle day 3-7) combined with HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between both groups with regard to number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate (5.39 ± 2.08 vs. 5.20 ± 1.88 and 22.06% vs. 16.18%, respectively).The total gonadotropins dose and medications cost per cycle were significantly lower in extended letrozole group (44.87 ± 9.16 vs. 59.97 ± 14.91 ampoules and 616.52 ± 94.97 vs. 746.84 ± 149.21 US Dollars ($), respectively).The cost-effectiveness ratio was 2794 $ in extended letrozole group and 4616 $ in short letrozole group.

CONCLUSION

Extended letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol was more cost-effective than short letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET.

Does 75 IU difference improve the cycle performance in poor responders? Comparison of daily 375 versus 450 IU gonadotrophin doses

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy on the cycle performance of 375 versus 450 IU/day gonadotrophin on the microdose flare-up protocol in poor responders.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 91 poor responder patients who were treated with the microdose flare-up protocol were enrolled in this study. Group 1 (n = 40) was stimulated with 375 IU/day gonadotrophin. Group 2 (n = 51) was stimulated with 450 IU/day gonadotrophin. Main outcome measurements were accepted as the results of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics are similar between the two groups. Higher number of oocyte cumulus complexes and lower total gonadotrophin requirement were noted in Group 1 compared with Group 2. Number of metaphase II oocytes and implantation rates were similar between the groups. A trend toward higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rate was observed in Group 1 but these results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Total gonadotrophin costs are lower using the 375 IU/day gonadotrophin compared to the 450 IU/day in poor responders. Additional 75 IU/day does not give any improvement neither embryology nor pregnancy outcomes.

Does the addition of clomiphene citrate or letrazole to gonadotropin treatment enhance the oocyte yield in poor responders undergoing IVF?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of adjunctive letrazole or clomiphene in IVF stimulation protocols.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of high dose GnRH antagonist IVF cycles (450-600 IU of gonadotropins) that have met poor responder criteria. Selected consecutive cycles in same patients differed solely in presence or absence of adjunctive clomiphene or letrazole.

RESULTS

Supplementation with clomiphene citrate in poor responders showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) in estradiol levels (1506 vs. 1044 pg/ml), number of dominant follicles (5.6 vs. 3.9), oocytes retrieved (5.2 vs. 3.4) and number of transferred embryos (1.7 vs. 1.1). It significantly improved biochemical pregnancy rates (18.1% vs. 5.9%) while reducing cycle cancellations (11.7% vs. 32.6%). Letrozole supplementation showed similar effects.

CONCLUSION

Both Clomiphene and Letrazole performed similarly and showed significant effects. However, despite increasing oocyte yield and embryo transfer rates, the overall clinical and live birth rate in this population remained low and showed no measurable increase.