Embryo quality and reproductive outcomes of spermatozoa selected by physiologic-ICSI or conventional ICSI in patients with kruger <4% and >4% normo-morphology

Sperm Selection Technology in ART

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a commonly used in vitro fertilization technique. Selection of sperm for injection is currently done using subjective assessment of morphology, which may not accurately identify the best-quality sperm. Hyaluronic acid receptors on sperm plasma membranes are a marker of maturity, and sperms which are capable of binding immobilized hyaluronic acid in vitro are of higher quality. This can be used as an advanced sperm selection technique to choose sperm for ICSI, termed physiological ICSI (PICSI). Several studies reported improved fertility treatment outcomes when using PICSI compared with conventional ICSI; however, the majority of studies are underpowered. Recently, a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, known as the Hyaluronic Acid Binding Sperm Selection (HABSelect) trial, found a significant reduction in miscarriage rates with PICSI, but no significant effect on live birth rate. There are still many avenues through which PICSI may provide an advantage, subject to confirmation by future research, such as improved long-term health of offspring. Other advanced sperm selection techniques include intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection, magnetic-activated cell sorting, and Zeta potential sperm selection; however, the most recent Cochrane review concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to ascertain whether these techniques improve clinical outcomes, such as live birth rates.

Effect of sperm selection using hyaluronan on fertilization and quality of cleavage-stage embryos in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of couples with severe teratozoospermia

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of hyaluronan-selected/physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (PICSI) on fertilization and quality of cleavage-stage embryos in infertile couples with ≤1% of spermatozoa with normal strict morphology (severe teratozoospermia). Seventy-seven couples underwent PICSI between October 2017 and December 2018 (PICSI group), while 75 couples underwent conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) between January 2016 and September 2017 (ICSI group). Good quality embryos (GQEs) were evaluated based on morphology. Patient and cycle characteristics were comparable between the PICSI and ICSI groups, except for age and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level (38.4 ± 3.9 years vs. 36.3 ± 4.3 years, p = .002 and 2.06 ± 1.99 ng/mL vs. 2.97 ± 3.25 ng/mL, p = .040). The fertilization rate per oocyte inseminated and GQE rate were significantly higher in the PICSI group than in the ICSI group (82.7% vs. 71.7%, p ˂ .001 and 52.8% vs. 34.0%, p ˂ .001). Furthermore, the absence of GQEs was found to be lower in the PICSI group (13.0% vs. 30.7%, p = .008). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age and AMH level identified PICSI as an unfavorable and independent factor for the absence of GQEs (adjusted odds ratio, 0.333; 95% confidence interval, 0.125-0.890). PICSI seems to be superior to ICSI in terms of fertilization and embryo quality in couples with severe teratozoospermia.

Clinical assessment of the male fertility

The evaluation of infertility in males consists of physical examination and semen analyses. Standardized semen analyses depend on the descriptive analysis of sperm motility, morphology, and concentration, with a threshold level that must be surpassed to be considered a fertile spermatozoon. Nonetheless, these conventional parameters are not satisfactory for clinicians since 25% of infertility cases worldwide remain unexplained. Therefore, newer tests methods have been established to investigate sperm physiology and functions by monitoring characteristics such as motility, capacitation, the acrosome reaction, reactive oxygen species, sperm DNA damage, chromatin structure, zona pellucida binding, and sperm-oocyte fusion. After the introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique, sperm maturity, morphology, and aneuploidy conditions have gotten more attention for investigating unexplained male infertility. In the present article, recent advancements in research regarding the utilization of male fertility prediction tests and their role and accuracy are reviewed.

Use of hyaluronic acid for sperm immobilisation and selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To appraise critically the published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the effectiveness of using hyaluronic acid (HA) for sperm immobilisation and selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

METHODS: Two authors used the PICO Method in order to perform a comprehensive literature search of the standard medical databases in June 2015. Data from the included studies was extracted independently by two authors using a predefined pro-forma. Review Manager (RevMan) was used to calculate the combined outcomes where multiple studies contributed with their results. Risk ratio (RR) with a 95%CI using the Mantel-Haenszel method was calculated for binary data variables. Heterogeneity was measured using the χ² test and quantified using I². In case of substantial heterogeneity (P < 0.10 for χ² test or I² > 50%) the combined outcome was calculated using the random effects model. The results from the meta-analysis were displayed as forest plots. The guideline of the Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess the risk of bias and it was illustrated as a risk of bias graph.

RESULTS: The systematic literature search identified 166 different studies related to sperm immobilisation and selection for ICSI. Eleven RCTs involving 13719 oocyte intracytoplasmatic injections with sperm immobilised and selected using HA or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was low heterogeneity among the included trials (χ² = 16.86, df = 11, P = 0.11; I² = 35%). There was no statistical difference between HA and PVP groups in terms of fertilisation rate (RR = 1.01; 95%CI: 0.99-1.03; z = 0.75; P = 0.45), good embryos rate (RR = 1.01; 95%CI: 0.96-1.06; z = 0.30; P = 0.76), live birth rate (RR = 1.15; 95%CI: 0.86-1.54; z = 0.92; P = 0.36), clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.04; 95%CI: 0.92-1.17; z = 0.62; P = 0.53) and implantation rate (RR = 1.17; 95%CI: 0.94-1.46; z = 0.40; P = 0.16). The quality of most of the included studies was moderate to poor because of unclear randomisation technique, inadequate allocation concealment and blinding.

CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence of similar efficiency between using HA or PVP for sperm immobilisation and selection before ICSI.

A prospective randomized study to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid sperm selection on the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome of patients with unexplained infertility having normal semen parameters

PURPOSE

Sperm quality plays an important role in determining embryo development and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Selection of competent sperm based on its ability to bind to hyaluronic acid (HA) has been suggested as one of the methods to assess sperm quality. The aim of the present study was to examine whether injection of HA bound sperm helps in improving outcome in patients undergoing ICSI with unexplained infertility having normal semen parameters.

METHODS

Patients with unexplained infertility having normal semen parameters in accordance with WHO 2010 criterion, undergoing their first IVF-ICSI cycle were enrolled during the course of the study.156 patients were prospectively randomized after oocyte retrieval and were assigned to either the ICSI group, where sperm selection for injection was based on visual assessment, or the PICSI group, where sperm were selected based on their ability to bind to HA. Only fresh embryo transfers were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the fertilization rates, number of top quality embryos and clinical pregnancy rates between the ICSI and PICSI groups (65.7 % vs 64.7 %; 45.8 % vs 43.6 % and 35 % vs 35.2 % respectively). However, a higher pregnancy loss rate was observed in the ICSI group (25 % vs 12 %; P = 0.227) as compared to the PICSI group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Implantation rates were 22.03 % and 18.84 % in the PICSI and ICSI groups respectively. There were 22 (31 %) live births in the PICSI group and 21(26.3 %) live births in the ICSI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unexplained infertility having normal semen parameters may constitute a patient group which does not benefit from this sperm selection method. A larger study may be necessary to establish a relationship between PICSI and pregnancy loss rate in patients undergoing IVF with unexplained infertility.

Application of sperm selection using hyaluronic acid binding in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a sibling oocyte study

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sperm selection by hyaluronic acid (HA) binding could improve fertilization rate and embryo quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Two hundred nineteen oocytes obtained from eighteen women were injected with either HA-bound (n = 107) or conventionally selected spermatozoa (n = 112) in a randomized way. All of the participants were infertile couples who had normal sperm parameters but low fertilization rate in previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle (n = 5) or experienced multiple IVF failures (n = 13). Lower fertilization (75.7% vs 83.0%) and cleavage rate on day 2 (72.9% vs 83.0%) was observed in oocytes injected with HA-bound spermatozoa than the conventional group, but the difference was not significant. Significantly lower cleavage rate was observed on day 3 in HA group (56.0% vs 69.6%, P = 0.038). Blastocyst formation rate and the number of transferred embryos were similar in both groups. In multiple IVF failure patients, significantly reduced fertilization rate (71.8% vs 85.3%, P = 0.046) and cleavage rate on day 2 (70.4% vs 85.3%, P = 0.029) and day 3 (53.5% vs 77.3%, P = 0.002) were noticed in HA group. Five women achieved pregnancy continuing more than 12 weeks after transfer (27.8%). Success of ICSI was not related with the number of embryos fertilized by HA-bound spermatozoa. Application of ICSI by sperm selection using HA binding is not helpful in couples with repeated poor fertilization or implantation despite normal sperm parameters.