Vasectomy: a guidelines-based approach to male surgical contraception

Characteristics, determinants of decision-making process and experience of French men undergoing vasectomy: a cross-sectional multicentric study

PURPOSE

The use of vasectomy varies hugely depending on the countries, even though it is one of the safest and simplest male contraceptive method. In France, its use recently increased. The purpose of this study was to report the characteristics, motivations, decision-making process and experience of French men undergoing vasectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional multicentric study was conducted in 17 French andrology laboratories in 2021-2022. All patients referred for post vasectomy semen analysis were proposed to participate in an online anonymous survey about vasectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 541 men were included in the study (56% participation rate). Participants were 41 years old on average and were mostly engaged in a stable relationship. Most of respondents had at least one child and waited >5 years after last birth before vasectomy A total of 134 men (25%) reported a history of unintended pregnancy. Most heard about vasectomy from relatives or media, rarely from doctors or authorities. Although most participants reported concerns about side effects, 81% experienced no side effects in the end of the procedure. The strong support of a partner (76%) appears to be a significant factor in the acceptance of this contraceptive method. A minority of participants had undergone semen cryopreservation before vasectomy.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the literature on male contraception, and highlights the history, motivations, experience, but also fears of men undergoing vasectomy.

Vasectomy Discussions in South Korea: Central Themes and Public Interest on Question-and-Answer Social Platforms

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to explore public perceptions and key issues related to vasectomy in South Korea. In particular, this paper seeks to analyze how vasectomy is discussed on question-and-answer (Q&A) social platforms including NAVER Jisik iN (knowledge exchange service between NAVER users) and to identify topics that capture public interest.

METHODS

In this study, based on data collected on NAVER Jisik iN from July 2019 to July 2024 with the keyword 'vasectomy,' this paper performs a co-occurrence matrix analysis on the Q&A data to identify key terms related to the topic. By applying connection centrality and community detection techniques, this paper visualizes and examines the network graph to uncover relationships between words and identify the primary topics of discussion.

RESULTS

The co-occurrence matrix analysis reveals that keywords such as 'surgery,' 'vasectomy,' and 'contraception' play a central role in discussions about vasectomies. Both the Q&A data highlight the vasectomy procedure and contraceptive effectiveness as primary topics of discussion. The visualization graphs intuitively display the centrality and strength of connections between these keywords, as well as the interrelatedness of topics through distinct community groups.

CONCLUSION

The analysis shows that the questions primarily focused on the surgical procedure, while the answers were more concerned with contraceptive effectiveness and physiological aspects. These results suggest that the public's interest in vasectomy is closely linked to its effectiveness, potential side effects, and related social issues.

Post-Vasectomy Semen Analysis: What's All the Fuss about?

Vasectomy is a reliable male contraceptive method with a success rate exceeding 98%. Despite its efficacy, vasectomy is not foolproof, with potential early and late failures requiring careful postoperative monitoring via post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA). Published guidelines emphasize the necessity of conducting PVSA to ensure clinical sterility. Despite these clear guidelines, discrepancies in adherence and interpretation persist, with significant mismatches between guidelines and actual practice. Recent shifts in societal attitudes toward reproductive autonomy, spurred by significant political events and socioeconomic factors, have increased vasectomy rates, particularly among younger, childless men. This demographic change calls for enhanced PVSA compliance and clear communication about the non-immediate contraceptive effect of vasectomy. Home test kits have emerged as a convenient, though not always reliable, method for conducting PVSAs, which may require reevaluation in clinical practice. Given the variations across clinical guidelines and the challenges in achieving consistent PVSA outcomes, further research is needed to harmonize PVSA protocols across different health systems. PVSA is typically conducted between 8 and 16 weeks post-vasectomy, depending on the surgeon's preference. Success is confirmed when a fresh, uncentrifuged sample exhibits either azoospermia, rare non-motile sperm (RNMS), or fewer than 100,000 non-motile sperm per milliliter. This effort will ensure that both patients and practitioners can rely on vasectomy as a safe and effective form of contraception. Effective patient counseling and strategic follow-up are crucial when it comes to managing expectations and ensuring compliance with post-vasectomy protocols, thereby minimizing the risk of unintended pregnancies post-procedure.

Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States

In June 2022 the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case Dobbs v. Jackson that overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling establishing a federally protected right to abortion in the United States. Anecdotal reports suggested increased vasectomy volume following this event; however, no published data exist. We sought to describe trends in vasectomy consultation before and after the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling (referred to as pre- and post-Dobbs herein). Following IRB approval, we reviewed charts of all adults seeking vasectomy consultation in July-August 2021 and July-August 2022 at a large healthcare organization. We then aggregated vasectomy procedural billing data from 2018 to present. The primary outcome was volume of vasectomy consultation appointments and the secondary outcome was number of vasectomies performed. In July-August 2021 (Pre-Dobbs), 116 men attended vasectomy consultation versus 142 men in July-August 2022 (Post-Dobbs). Median age Post-Dobbs was significantly younger than Pre-Dobbs (35 vs 38 years, respectively, p = 0.01) with a significant increase in Post-Dobbs men under 30 seeking vasectomy (p = 0.005). A total of 16.9% (24/142) of Post-Dobbs men were childless, compared to 8.6% (10/116) of Pre-Dobbs men (p = 0.05). Of those with children, median number of offspring was unchanged at 2. Billing data showed a significant increase in vasectomy procedural volumes Post-Dobbs. While overturning Roe v Wade directly impacted female reproductive rights, number of vasectomy consultations and procedures increased significantly following this decision. Younger men, especially those under 30, as well as childless men were significantly more likely to seek consultation Post-Dobbs compared to the prior reproductive legal climate. While longer-term data are needed, findings indicate that men are invested in maintaining reproductive autonomy for themselves and their partners.

Dynamism of andrological surgery in France: Evolution of procedures over 10 years

INTRODUCTION

Andrology and urogenital reconstruction are emerging disciplines in French urology. The aim of our study was to evaluate the evolution of andrological surgical procedures over the period 2013-2022 using national data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected national common classification of medical acts (CCAM) coding data for all procedures involving andrological surgery from the Scansanté internet platform set up by the Technical Agency for Information on Hospitalisation, which collects prospectively from healthcare structures all procedures coded according to CCAM coding. All surgical procedures in andrology were selected. The inclusion period extended from 2013 to 2022.

RESULTS

In 10 years, the number of vasectomies has increased tenfold, with 29,890 cases in 2022. Vaso-vasostomies remain marginal, with 80 cases per year. Trans-identity surgeries are rising sharply. Vaginoplasties have multiplied by 4 (333 in 2022) and masculinising surgeries have multiplied by 10 (234 in 2022). Penile prosthesis surgery has increased slightly over 10 years. The number of testicular biopsies has remained stable over time, as has the number of surgeries for curvature of the penis.

CONCLUSION

Two andrological surgeries are showing very strong growth: vasectomy and transgender surgery. The emergence of these 2 activities is linked to societal aspirations. Urologists need to be trained to meet this demand.

NIVEAU DE PREUVE

Grade 4.

Assessing Current Interest, Knowledge, and Inquiries About Vasectomies in Urology Patients and Medical Students

Background and objective Since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, there has been an increased interest in vasectomy procedures. This study aims to analyze interest, knowledge, and inquiries about the vasectomy procedure among urology patients and osteopathic medical students since this overturn. It also seeks to determine if this data varies between the ages and sexes of participants. It is hoped that the findings will aid in the development of a standardized educational plan that might be provided to urologists for future use with patients and their partners. Methods Surveys consisting of 10 questions regarding interests, knowledge, and inquiries about vasectomy procedures and the changes in interest following the Roe v. Wade decision were distributed to urology patients and osteopathic medical students. Results Female students had an increased interest in their current or future male partner obtaining a vasectomy procedure compared to a year ago, whereas older urology patients and male students did not. Based on the responses to the posed queries, the most important information to include in a standardized educational plan for patients is the overall risks and their likelihood, the likelihood of reversal, and the procedure's recovery time and surgical details. Conclusion Female students' increased interest in the vasectomy procedure may be due to the recent overturn of Roe v. Wade. Therefore, physicians must counsel their male patients' female partners or interested females appropriately regarding vasectomies, as more may now be interested. Additionally, an educational plan based on this study's data may be utilized with future urology patients. Placing emphasis on what patients want to know may help ease patient's associated anxiety with their future procedure and strengthen the relationship between the patient and physician.

Vasectomy has No Impact on Future Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Diagnoses: A Retrospective Cohort Claims Database Analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess whether there is an association between vasectomy and benign prostatic hyperplasia with associated lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS) due to inflammatory etiology.

Materials and Methods

We assessed the incidence of BPH/LUTS in men who had undergone vasectomy in a matched cohort analysis using the TriNetX Research Network. We identified men aged 30 to 60 years who underwent vasectomy and had a follow-up visit within 6 months to 5 years after vasectomy from January 2010 through December 2022 and compared them with matched controls. Outcomes recorded include diagnoses of BPH (N40, N40.1), BPH-related medication prescriptions, and BPH-related procedures. We accounted for confounding variables through propensity score-matching for age; race; and history of comorbid medical conditions: hyperlipidemia (International Classification of Disease-10: E78), metabolic syndrome (E88.81), overweight or obesity (E66), testicular hypofunction (E29.1), hypertension (I10-I16), nicotine dependence (F17), and obstructive sleep apnea (G47.33).

Results

There was no significant difference in BPH diagnosis between postvasectomy men vs controls (0.84% vs 0.80%, RR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05) or BPH/LUTS diagnosis (0.48% vs 0.44%, RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.05) within 6 months to 5 years after vasectomy, respectively. No differences in BPH medication prescription (0.94% vs 0.84%) or rate of BPH procedures (0.022% vs 0.017%) were detected between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

This study suggests that vasectomy does not increase the risk of BPH development and/or LUTS worsening compared with the general population, providing assurance to both patients and health care providers who may consider vasectomy as a safe family planning option.

[Recommendations of the Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the AFU concerning the management of Vasectomy]

OBJECTIVES

To answer the main clinical questions asked by practitioners and men consulting for a vasectomy request.

METHOD

The CPR method was used. The clinical questions were formulated according to the PICO methodology. A Pubmed literature search for the period 1984-2021 identified 508 references, of which 79 were selected and analyzed with the GRADE grid.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Vasectomy is a permanent, potentially reversible contraception. It is a safe procedure. A second vasectomy is necessary in only 1 % of cases. Surgical complications (hematoma, infection, pain, etc.) are rare. The frequency of prolonged scrotal pain after vasectomy is about 5 %, and less than 2 % describe a negative impact of this pain on their quality of life. Vasectomy does not have negative consequences on sexuality. The only contraindication to vasectomy is the minor patient. Patients at increased risk of remorse are single, divorced or separated men under the age of 30. Sperm storage may be particularly appropriate for them. Whatever the reason, the law allows the surgeon to refuse to perform the vasectomy. He must inform the patient of this at the first consultation. The choice of the type of anesthesia is left to the discretion of the surgeon and the patient. It must be decided during the preoperative consultation. Local anesthesia should be considered first. General anesthesia should be particularly considered in cases of anxiety or intense sensitivity of the patient to palpation of the vas deferens, difficulty palpating the vas deferens, or a history of scrotal surgery that would make the procedure more complex. Concerning the vasectomy technique, 2 points seem to improve the efficiency of the vasectomy: coagulation of the deferential mucosa and interposition of fascia. Leaving the proximal end of the vas deferens free seems to reduce the risk of post-vasectomy syndrome without increasing the risk of failure or complications. No-scalpel vasectomy is associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications than conventional vasectomy. Regarding follow-up, it is recommended to perform a spermogram at 3 months post-vasectomy and after 30 ejaculations. If there are still a few non-motile spermatozoa at 3 months, it is recommended that a check-up be performed at 6 months post-vasectomy. In case of motile spermatozoa or more than 100,000 immobile spermatozoa/mL at 6 months (defining failure), a new vasectomy should be considered. Contraception must be maintained until the effectiveness of the vasectomy is confirmed.

Post-Vasectomy Semen Analysis: Optimizing Laboratory Procedures and Test Interpretation through a Clinical Audit and Global Survey of Practices

PURPOSE

The success of vasectomy is determined by the outcome of a post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA). This article describes a step-by-step procedure to perform PVSA accurately, report data from patients who underwent post vasectomy semen analysis between 2015 and 2021 experience, along with results from an international online survey on clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a detailed step-by-step protocol for performing and interpretating PVSA testing, along with recommendations for proficiency testing, competency assessment for performing PVSA, and clinical and laboratory scenarios. Moreover, we conducted an analysis of 1,114 PVSA performed at the Cleveland Clinic's Andrology Laboratory and an online survey to understand clinician responses to the PVSA results in various countries.

RESULTS

Results from our clinical experience showed that 92.1% of patients passed PVSA, with 7.9% being further tested. A total of 78 experts from 19 countries participated in the survey, and the majority reported to use time from vasectomy rather than the number of ejaculations as criterion to request PVSA. A high percentage of responders reported permitting unprotected intercourse only if PVSA samples show azoospermia while, in the presence of few non-motile sperm, the majority of responders suggested using alternative contraception, followed by another PVSA. In the presence of motile sperm, the majority of participants asked for further PVSA testing. Repeat vasectomy was mainly recommended if motile sperm were observed after multiple PVSA's. A large percentage reported to recommend a second PVSA due to the possibility of legal actions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlighted varying clinical practices around the globe, with controversy over the significance of non-motile sperm in the PVSA sample. Our data suggest that less stringent AUA guidelines would help improve test compliance. A large longitudinal multi-center study would clarify various doubts related to timing and interpretation of PVSA and would also help us to understand, and perhaps predict, recanalization and the potential for future failure of a vasectomy.

The Omission of Genitourinary Physical Exam in Telehealth Pre-Vasectomy Consults Does Not Reduce Rates of Office Procedure Completion

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the omission of pre-procedure genitourinary exam for vasectomy inherent to a virtual consultation reduces the likelihood of successfully completing in-office vasectomy. Currently, the AUA Vasectomy guidelines encourage in-person examination when possible, though COVID-19 has catalyzed the uptake of virtual consultations at many institutions. We hypothesized that rates of completed in-office vasectomy do not significantly differ between patients examined during consultation in the office and those seen virtually with no exam.

METHODS

Virtual vasectomy consults from April to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and compared to a size-matched, randomly-selected control group who underwent in-office vasectomy consultation. The primary outcome was completion of in-office bilateral vasectomy. Baseline demographic characteristics were compared. Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test were performed on categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 211 patients who underwent virtual vasectomy consultation during the study period, 153 presented for in-office vasectomy. They were compared to 153 vasectomies from the in-person consult cohort. No demographic differences were observed between virtual and in-office consult groups. No statistical difference was observed in completion rates of in-office vasectomy, which was 97.4% (149/153) in the virtual consult cohort and 98.7% (151/153) in the in-office consultation cohort (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of completed in-office vasectomy did not significantly differ based on consult platform, suggesting that a pre-vasectomy physical exam is not required to predict successful completion of the procedure. Telehealth should be utilized as an additional platform to improve access for male contraceptive procedures in a young and busy population.