Assessing Intersectional Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening by Disability Status, Race, and Ethnicity

Cervical cancer screening rates in females living with HIV at three healthcare settings in the United States, 2010-2019

PURPOSE

Females living with human immunodeficiency virus (FLWHIV) are at increased risk of cervical cancer and U.S. guidelines, first published in 2009 and updated since then, recommend more frequent screening in this population. We examined screening rates among FLWHIV in the U.S. during 2010-2019.

METHODS

This cohort study included 18-89-year-old FLWHIV during 2010-2019 at three U.S. healthcare settings. Sociodemographics, comorbidities, and cervical cancer screening tests were ascertained from administrative and clinical databases. We reported cervical cancer screening rates overall and by modality. Generalized estimating equations with Poisson distribution were used to estimate screening rate ratios (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between screening rates and calendar year, age, race and ethnicity, and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Among 3,556 FLWHIV, a total of 7,704 cervical cancer screening tests were received over 18,605 person-years during 2010-2019 (screening rate = 41.4 per 100 person-years). Relatively lower screening rates were associated with later calendar years (SRR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.68-0.75] for 2017-2019 versus 2010-2013), older age (SRR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.74-0.89] for 50-65-year-olds versus 18-29-year-olds), non-Hispanic white race versus non-Hispanic Black race (SRR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.81-0.98]) and greater comorbidity burden (SRR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.82-0.98] for ≥ 9 versus 0-6 comorbidity score).

CONCLUSION

The decrease in cervical cancer screening rates during 2010-2019 in this large cohort of FLWHIV may be explained at least partly by guideline changes during the study period recommending longer screening intervals. Our findings of relatively lower screening rates in FLWHIV who were non-Hispanic white, older, and with greater comorbidity burden should be confirmed in other U.S.

SETTINGS

The effect of the expansion of the Personal Assistance Service Program on the uptake of the National Health Screening in people with severe disability

BACKGROUND

Korea operates the Personal Assistance Service (PAS) program, a social service program that assists with the daily activities and coping needs of individuals with disabilities. In January 2013, the eligibility to enroll in the PAS program was expanded to include all individuals with severe disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

As supporting individuals with disabilities is important in reducing disparities related to the uptake of health screening, this study investigated whether eligibility expansion of the PAS program was associated with increased participation in the National Health Screening Program (NHSP) among adults with severe disabilities.

METHODS

Nationwide data from Korea that included 24 701 individuals were used. The treatment group included individuals with severe disabilities, while the control group included those with mild disabilities. The difference-in-difference approach was used to estimate differences in participation in the NHSP between the two groups before and after the intervention period. A negative binomial distribution model was applied in the analysis with adjustment for all independent variables.

RESULTS

The expansion of the PAS program was directly related to an increase in NHSP uptake by people with severe disabilities (increase by 0.044 times compared to the control group following the implementation of the policy).

CONCLUSIONS

Expanding the eligibility for the PAS program was associated with an increase in NHSP participation among individuals with severe disabilities. These findings suggest the importance of supporting individuals with disabilities by increasing participation in health screenings to reduce potential related health disparities.

Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Women with Disabilities: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study in Chile

The Papanicolaou (Pap) test is one of the most effective methods for cervical cancer screening. However, women with disabilities are less likely to be screened. The objective of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in Pap test utilisation between women with and without disabilities and to analyse the demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics associated with Pap test uptake among women with disabilities in Chile. Data from the 2022 National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey were analysed, and 71,989 women between 18 and 75 years of age were included. The dependent variable was Pap test utilisation, and the exposure variable was disability. We used logistic regressions to control for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related covariates. The results showed that women with disabilities were less likely to undergo a Pap test compared to those without disabilities. Characteristics such as being married, being aged between 25 and 64 years, and having secondary or tertiary education increased the likelihood of Pap test utilisation. Conversely, being single, having received special education, and being inactive decreased these odds. Effective public health policies are needed that will increase Pap test utilisation for all population subgroups, including women with disabilities and, therefore, promote health equity.

Principles for Service Delivery: Best Practices for Cervical Screening for Women with Disabilities

Background

Cervical cancer screening is an important public health priority, yet many marginalized groups are not reached by existing programs. The nearly 700 million women with disabilities globally face substantial barriers in accessing cervical cancer screening and have lower coverage, yet there is limited evidence on what would support enhanced uptake among this population.

Methods

We updated a systematic review to estimate the disparity in screening uptake for women with disabilities. We conducted a scoping review to understand key barriers and the inclusion of disability in existing screening policies and possible solutions to improve screening uptakes amongst women with disabilities. We then formulated key principles for improved service delivery for this group, targeted predominantly at clinicians.

Results

Our updated review identified an additional five new studies, and confirmed that women with disabilities were less likely to be screened for cervical cancer (RR=0.65, 0.50-0.84). Disability-specific barriers to accessing screening pertained to: (1) knowledge and autonomy; (2) logistics; and (3) stigma and fear. Few guidelines included specific considerations for women with disabilities. Our scoping review showed that improving access to care must focus on improving (1) autonomy, awareness, and affordability; (2) human resources; and (3) health facility accessibility.

Conclusion

Screening programmes and health providers must ensure women with disabilities are included in cervical cancer screening programmes and thereby help to achieve their right to health and eliminate cervical cancer as a public health issue.

The Association of Cervical Cancer Screening With Disability Type Among U.S. Women (Aged 25-64 Years)

INTRODUCTION

Despite a gradual decline in cervical cancer mortality because of greater use of screening, including Pap and human papillomavirus (HPV) tests, disparities in screening among adult women by disability type have not been examined. This study aims to assess the odds of cervical cancer screening using HPV tests by disability type among U.S. women aged 25-64 years.

METHODS

This study was analyzed in 2022 using pooled data from 2018 and the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor and Surveillance System. The analytic sample included 189,795 women aged 25-64 years. Disability was defined as having any sensory disability, cognitive disability, physical disability, ≥2 disabilities, or no disability adapted from a standardized questionnaire. Descriptive analyses were used to estimate the proportion of HPV tests on the basis of 2020 American Cancer Society guidelines, which recommend testing within five years for all women aged 25-65 years. Multivariable analyses were conducted to estimate AORs of cervical cancer screening by disability type.

RESULTS

Overall, 53.8% of women met recommended 2020 American Cancer Society guidelines for cervical cancer screening using HPV tests. The proportion of HPV tests was higher in women with a cognitive disability (55.9%) and lower in those with sensory (49.7%), physical (48.2%), and ≥2 disabilities (47.8%) than in those without disabilities (54.8%). In adjusted analyses, women with any disability (AOR=0.95, 95% CI=0.88, 0.97), physical disability (AOR=0.96, 95% CI=0.80, 0.98), and ≥2 disabilities (AOR=0.88, 95% CI=0.78, 0.97) had lower odds of receiving cervical cancer screening with HPV testing than women without disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in screening with HPV tests among women with physical and ≥2 disabilities suggest the need for a targeted approach to improve prevention screening awareness, access, and availability in this population.