Endoluminal suturing may overcome the limitations of clip closure of a gaping wide colon perforation (with videos)

Minimally invasive surgical management of Boerhaave's syndrome: a narrative literature review

Treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome is controversial. Formal thoracotomy and laparotomy were considered the gold standard treatment in the past. However, these approaches are associated with significant surgical trauma, stress, and postoperative pain. Recently published studies reported the application of minimally invasive surgery in the setting of such esophageal emergency. However, the application of minimally invasive surgery in the setting of Boerhaave's syndrome is debated and evidence is puzzled. The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge on minimally invasive treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were consulted. All articles that described the management of Boerhaave's syndrome in the setting of minimally invasive surgery (thoracoscopy or laparoscopy) were included. Sixteen studies and forty-eight patients were included. The age of the patient population ranged from 37 to 81 years old and 74% were males. The time shift period from symptoms onset to surgical treatment ranged from 5 to 240 hours with 10 patients (20.8%) having surgery more than 24 hours from symptoms onset. Vomiting (100%), chest/epigastric pain (88%), and dyspnea (62%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. The perforation size ranged from 6 to 30 mm with 96% of patients suffering from distal esophageal tear. Video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) was the most commonly reported surgical approach (75%), followed by laparoscopy (16.7%), and combined thoraco-laparoscopy (6.2%). In case of VATS, a left approach was adopted in 91% of patients with selective lung ventilation. Primary suture was the most commonly performed surgical procedure (60%) with interrupted single or dual-layer repair. Surgical debridement (25%), primary repair reinforced with gastric or omental patch (8%), esophageal repair over T-tube (6%), and endoscopic stenting combined with laparoscopic debridement (2%) were also reported. The postoperative morbidity was 64.5% with pneumonia (42%), pleural empyema (26%), and leak (19%) being the most commonly reported complications. The overall mortality was 8.3%. Boerhaave's syndrome is a rare entity. Minimally invasive surgical treatment seems promising, feasible, and safe in selected patients with early presentation and stable vital signs managed in referral centers. In the management algorithm of Boerhaave's syndrome, a definitive indication to adopt minimally invasive surgery is lacking and its potential role mandates further analysis.

The Use of the Overstitch to Close Perforations and Fistulas

Endoscopic suturing allows for select patients with perforations, leaks, and fistulas to be managed endoscopically. Experience with the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device suggests it may be superior to endoclips in the management of perforations, because of its ability to achieve full-thickness suturing and create an airtight closure. Although successful closure of leaks and fistulas using the Overstitch device has been described, additional therapy with a multimodality approach is often required because of inherent challenges with fistula recurrence. This article reviews the existing literature on the Overstitch endoscopic suturing system specifically in the management of gastrointestinal perforations, leaks, and fistulas.

Closure of Defects and Management of Complications

Large and complex colon polyps are frequently referred to surgery for fear of perforation that may need emergency surgery. During the last 15 years, advances in clip and suturing devices allowed us to close perforations and avoid surgery. In addition, we have made substantial progress in our understanding of the lesions at risk for either immediate or delayed perforation. This article focuses on the colonoscopic closure of resection defects and perforations and the prevention and treatment of colon perforations after endoscopic resection.

Management of colonoscopic perforation: a systematic review and treatment algorithm

BACKGROUND

The aim of this review is to evaluate and summarize the current strategies used in the management of colonoscopic perforations as well as propose a modern treatment algorithm.

METHODS

Articles published between January 2004 and January 2019 were screened. A total of 167 reports were identified in combined literature search, of which 61 articles were selected after exclusion of duplicate and unrelated articles. Only studies that reported on the management of endoscopic perforation in an adult population were retrieved for review. Case reports and case series of 8 patients or less were not considered. Ultimately, 19 articles were considered eligible for review.

RESULTS

A total of 744 cases of colonoscopic perforations were reported in 19 major articles. The cause of perforation was mentioned in 16 articles. Colonoscopic perforations were reported as a consequence of diagnostic colonoscopies in 222 cases and therapeutic colonoscopies in 248 cases. The site of perforation was mentioned in 486 cases. Sigmoid colon was the predominant site followed by the cecum. The management of colonoscopic perforations was reported in a total of 741 patients. Surgical intervention was employed in 75% of the patients, of these 15% were laparoscopic and 85% required laparotomy. The predominant surgical intervention was primary repair.

CONCLUSION

Management strategies of colon perforations depend upon the etiology, size, severity, location, available expertise, and general health status. Usually, peritonitis, sepsis, or hemodynamic compromise requires immediate surgical management. Endoscopic techniques are under continuous evolution. Newer developments have offered high success rate with least amount of post-procedure complications. However, there is a need for further studies to compare the newer endoscopic techniques in terms of success rate, cost, complications, and the affected part of colon.

Utility of endoscopic therapy in the management of Boerhaave syndrome

Background/aims: The optimal intervention for Boerhaave perforation has not been determined. Options include surgical repair with/without a pedicled muscle flap, T tube placement, esophageal resection or diversion, or an endoscopic approach. All management strategies require adequate drainage and nutritional support. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes following Boerhaave perforation treated with surgery, endoscopic therapy, or both. Patients and methods: We performed a 10-year review of our prospectively maintained databases of adult patients with Boerhaave perforations. We documented clinical presentation, extent of injury, primary intervention, "salvage" treatment (any treatment for persistent leak), and outcome. Results were analyzed using the Fisher's exact and Kruskal - Wallis tests. Results: Between October 2004 and October 2014, 235 patients presented with esophageal leak/fistula with 17 Boerhaave perforations. Median age was 68 years. Median length of perforation was 1.25 cm (range 0.8 - 5 cm). Four patients presented with systemic sepsis (two treated with palliative stent and two surgically). Primary endotherapy was performed for eight (50 %) and primary surgery for eight (50 %) patients. Two endotherapy patients required multiple stents. Median stent duration was 61 days (range 56 - 76). "Salvage" intervention was required in 2/8 (25 %) endotherapy patients and 1/8 (13 %) surgery patient (stent). All patients healed without resection/reconstruction. There were no deaths in the surgically treated group and two in the endotherapy group (stented with palliative intent due to poor systemic condition). Readmission within 30 days occurred in 3/6 of alive endotherapy patients (50 %) and 0/8 surgery patients. Re-intervention within 30 days was required for one endotherapy patient. Conclusion: Endoscopic repair of Boerhaave perforations can be useful in carefully selected patients without evidence of systemic sepsis. Endoscopic therapy such as stenting is particularly valuable as a "salvage" intervention. The benefits of endoscopic therapy and esophageal preservation are offset against an increased risk of readmission in patients primarily treated endoscopically.

Endoscopic management of colonic perforations: clips versus suturing closure (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perforation during colonoscopy remains the most worrisome adverse event and usually requires urgent surgical rescue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic closure of full-thickness colonic perforations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with endoscopically closed colonic perforations over the past 6 years (2009-2014). Colonic perforations were closed by using endoscopic clips or an endoscopic suturing device. Most patients were admitted for treatment with intravenous antibiotics and kept on bowel rest. If their clinical condition deteriorated, urgent surgery was performed. If patients remained stable, oral feeding was resumed, and patients were discharged with subsequent clinical and endoscopic follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients had iatrogenic colonic perforations closed with an endoscopic suturing device or endoscopic clips during the study period. Primary closure of a colonic perforation was performed with endoscopic clips in 5 patients and sutured with an endoscopic suturing device in 16 patients. All 5 patients after clip closure had worsening of abdominal pain and required laparoscopy (4 patients) or rescue colonoscopy with endoscopic suturing closure (1 patient). Two patients had abdominal pain after endoscopic suturing closure, but diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed complete and adequate endoscopic closure of the perforations. The other 15 patients did not require any rescue surgery or laparoscopy after endoscopic suturing. The main limitation of our study is its retrospective, single-center design and relatively small number of patients.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic suturing closure of colonic perforations is technically feasible, eliminates the need for rescue surgery, and appears more effective than closure with hemostatic endoscopic clips.

Establishment of Over-The-Scope-Clips (OTSC®) in daily endoscopic routine

BACKGROUND

Alongside the evolution of interventional endoscopy, the need for a more sophisticated closure tool tailored to the treatment of new challenging indications has been increasing rapidly.

METHODS

We here present our collected data on 262 Over-The-Scope-Clip (OTSC®) placements in a total of 233 interventions at our institution. Follow-up was focused on clinically lasting success with regards to different indications.

RESULTS

Immediate success of OTSC® treatment was observed in 87.1% of all sessions (203/233). The success rates per indication were as follows: spontaneous bleeding 84.8% (28/33); iatrogenic bleeding 100% (20/20); acute perforation 90.3% (65/72); prophylaxis for perforation 100% (24/24); anastomotic leakage 61.1% (11/18); fistulae 80.7% (46/57); diameter reduction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis 100% (6/6); and stent fixation 100% (3/3). At 30-day follow-up, the overall success rate was 67.4% (157/233). The success rates per indication were as follows: spontaneous bleeding 69.7% (23/33); iatrogenic bleeding 90% (18/20); acute perforation 86.1% (62/72); prophylaxis for perforation 100% (24/24); anastomotic leakage 33.3% (6/18); fistulae 29.8% (17/57), diameter reduction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis 83.3% (5/6); and stent fixation 66% (2/3).

CONCLUSIONS

Our cohort confirms previous data on the clinical usefulness of the OTSC® in daily routine practice.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided puncture suture device versus metal clip for gastric defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection: A randomized, comparative, porcine study

OBJECTIVE

The secure closure of the wall defect is a critical stage of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). The aim of this study was to compare the closure of post-EFTR defects using an endoscopic ultrasound-guided puncture suture device (PSD) with the metal clip (MC) technique in a randomized, comparative, porcine study.

METHODS

We performed a randomized comparative survival study that included 18 pigs. The circular EFTR defects with a diameter of approximately 20 mm were closed with either a PSD or MC. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined preoperatively and on a postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, and 7. Three animals from each group were sacrificed at the end of the 7 th , 14 th , and 30 th POD. Tissue samples retrieved from the closure sites were examined macroscopically and microscopically.

RESULTS

Resection and closure were performed in 18 pigs (100%) without major perioperative complications. The mean closure time was significantly longer in the MC group than in the PSD group (25.00 ± 3.16 min vs. 1.56 ± 0.39 min; P < 0.05). Preoperative and POD 7 serum levels of IL-6 did not differ between the two groups. However, on POD 1, the IL-6 levels were observed to be significantly greater in the MC group than in the PSD group (P < 0.005). No significant differences between the PSD and MC groups were observed at necropsy.

CONCLUSION

In this in vivo porcine model, PSD is a feasible device that achieves post-EFTR defect closure with a much shorter closure time and with less immunological responses than the MC technique.

Endoscopic Suturing, an Essential Enabling Technology for New NOTES Interventions

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) was developed as a new, minimally invasive approach for various interventions inside the peritoneal cavity. Since the first reports of NOTES animal interventions, various devices have been used for closure of the transluminal entrance site. This article reviews the most commonly used endoscopic closure devices and advantages of the latest generation of endoscopic suturing devices enabling reliable, surgical-quality closure of the full-thickness gastrointestinal wall defects.

Endoscopic Treatment of Gastrointestinal Perforations, Leaks, and Fistulae

Gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae are common postoperative complications, whereas intestinal perforation more commonly complicates advanced endoscopic procedures. Although these complications have classically been managed surgically, there exists an ever-expanding role for endoscopic therapy and the involvement of advanced endoscopists as part of a multidisciplinary team including surgeons and interventional radiologists. This review will serve to highlight the innovative endoscopic interventions that provide an expanding range of viable endoscopic approaches to the management and therapy of gastrointestinal perforation, leaks, and fistulae.

A Novel Method for Endoscopic Closure of Bladder Perforations During NOTES: Initial Experience from Animal Studies

OBJECTIVES

Translumenal access site closure remains a major challenge in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®); American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Oak Brook, IL] and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons [Los Angeles, CA]). We assessed the feasibility and safety of using reserved threads to close the bladder perforation during NOTES and analyzed this novel technique in a live porcine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five female pigs were used in this study. With the animal under general anesthesia, a self-made trocar was inserted into the bladder. Under ureteroscopic guidance, the anterior bladder wall was punctured by a needle into the abdominal wall, and two reserved lines were placed. The bladder perforation was closed with the reserved lines. Procedure time and effectiveness of the closure were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

We completed a total of 5 cases of animal experiments. The first case failed because the weight and size of the animal were too large. The remaining 4 cases were successful. The procedure times were 45, 30, 25, and 25 minutes, respectively. The perforations were closed completely.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel method of using reserved thread to close the bladder perforation was safe and effective. Further large-scale survival studies are needed to prove its clinical potential.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status

Conventional endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection are powerful tools for treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, those techniques are restricted to superficial layers of the gastrointestinal wall. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an evolving technique, which is just about to enter clinical routine. It is not only a powerful tool for diagnostic tissue acquisition but also has the potential to spare surgical therapy in selected patients. This review will give an overview about current EFTR techniques and devices.

Comparison of endoscopic band ligation and endoclip closure of colonic perforation: technical feasibility and efficacy in an ex vivo pig model

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recent reports have indicated several instances of successful treatment of bowel perforation by using endoscopic band ligation (EBL) when treatment with endoclipping is unsuccessful, but this salvage method has not been investigated in any prospective model. Herein we aimed to compare the technical feasibility and efficacy of EBL and endoclip use in intraluminal closure of colon perforation, in an ex vivo model.

METHODS

Standardized colonic perforations were created using fresh porcine colon and subsequently closed by full-thickness interrupted sutures, endoclip (QuickClip2(TM)), or EBL. Each closure site was tested with compressed air by using a digital pressure monitor for evaluating leak pressure.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted between the endoclip and EBL in leak pressures. Mean (± SD) pressures for air leakage from the perforations closed using the different devices were as follows: normal colon samples, 52.0 ± 13.2 mmHg; perforations closed with hand-sewn sutures, 32.3 ± 8.3 mmHg; perforations closed with endoclipping, 53.5 ± 22.7 mmHg; and perforations closed with EBL, 50.4 ± 12.5 mmHg. Time taken for closure by EBL was significantly less than that for closure by endoclipping (3.2 ± 1.7 min vs 6.8 ± 1.3 min, P < 0.01). Further, the number of devices used to achieve complete closure in the EBL group was lower than that with endoclipping (1.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.7 ± 0.8, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal closure of a 1.5-cm colon perforation with EBL decreased procedure time and was not inferior in leak pressure compared with endoclipping in this ex vivo porcine model.

Endoscopic clip closure of gastrointestinal perforations, fistulae, and leaks

Development of endoscopic devices to close perforations has certainly revolutionized endoscopy. Immediate closure of perforations eliminates the need for surgery, which allows us to push the limits of endoscopic surgery from the mucosal plane to deep submucosal layers and eventually transmurally. The present article focuses on endoscopic closure devices, closure techniques, followed by a review of animal and clinical studies on endoscopic closure of perforations.

NOTES for the management of an intra-abdominal abscess: transcolonic peritonoscopy and abscess drainage in a canine model

BACKGROUND

We studied natural orifice transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses in a canine survival model to evaluate the difficulty of peritonoscopy and abscess drainage and the reliability of endoluminal colotomy closure.

METHODS

We placed a 7 cm nonsterile saline-filled latex balloon intra-abdominally to mimic or induce an abscess or inflammatory mass. Seven days later, we advanced a single-channel endoscope transanally into the sigmoid colon of the animal, made a colotomy and then advanced the endoscope intraperitoneally. We evacuated the identified abscess and placed a drain transabdominally. We closed the colotomy endoluminally with a tissue approximation system using 2 polypropylene sutures attached to metal T-bars. Two weeks later, we evaluated the colotomy closure at laparotomy.

RESULTS

We studied 12 dogs: 8 had subphrenic balloon implants and 4 had interbowel loop implants. Eleven survived and underwent transcolonic peritonoscopy; we identified the "abscess" in 9. The colotomy was successfully closed in 10 of 11 dogs. Although abscesses were easily identified, the overall difficulty of the peritonoscopy was moderate to severe. One dog required colotomy closure via laparotomy, while 9 had successful endoluminal closure. After colotomy closure, 8 animals survived for 2 weeks (study end point) without surgical complications, sepsis or localized abdominal infections. On postmortem examination, all closures were intact without any adjacent organ damage or procedure-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery provides a novel alternative to treating intra-abdominal pathology. It is technically feasible to perform endoscopic transcolonic peritonoscopy and drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess with reliable closure of the colotomy in a canine experimental model.

Hemodynamic efficacy of the over-the-scope clip in an established porcine cadaveric model for spurting bleeding

BACKGROUND

Clip application has been proven to be effective for endoscopic hemostasis. There are limited bench data on the efficacy of the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) for the treatment of spurting GI hemorrhage. We evaluated the hemodynamic efficacy of the OTSC in an established bleeding model.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the hemodynamic efficacy of the OTSC in an established bleeding model.

DESIGN

Prospective experimental trial with historical comparison.

SETTING

We tested the OTSC prospectively in a validated bleeding model by using the compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy equipped with an upper GI organ package. The artificial blood circulation system of the simulator was connected to an arterial pressure transducer. Two investigators with different endoscopic experience (4000 and 10,000 endoscopies performed) participated. Each investigator treated 16 bleeding sites in the simulator with the OTSC by using only suction (n = 8) and a novel retraction device to grasp tissue (n = 8). Systemic pressures were recorded 1 minute before, during, and 1 minute after clip application to objectify the effects of clipping on the vessel diameter.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Mean and maximum reduction in vessel diameter.

RESULTS

The application of the OTSC on the bleeding vessel led to a significant increase in systemic pressure (P < .001) and decreased vessel diameter (P < .001) independent of the endoscopic experience of the investigator. There was no difference in the decrease in vessel diameter based on the application technique (suction vs suction plus grasping). A historical comparison with our former trials demonstrated that the OTSC decreased the vessel diameter significantly more than other traditional endoclips.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

We could demonstrate the efficacy of the OTSC with increased hemodynamic efficiency compared with other endoscopic clip devices tested previously.

Gastrointestinal perforations: role of endoscopic closure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Understanding the role of endoscopic closure techniques helps in expanding the endoscopist's role in the management of gastrointestinal neoplasia and explore new frontiers of minimally invasive endoluminal surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article covers recent advances in endoscopic closure of various gastrointestinal perforations, with a special focus on devices, experimental evidence and clinical outcomes of endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal perforations.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic closure techniques help the endoscopist to walk on thin ice and save himself and the patient in the case of mishap.

Endoscopic closure of GI fistulae by using an over-the-scope clip (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have demonstrated the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) to be feasible and safe for closure of gastric, duodenal, and colonic perforations. A retrospective clinical study demonstrated the feasibility and preliminary safety of the OTSC for the treatment of GI bleeding and closure of acute GI perforations.

OBJECTIVE

Because the OTSC allows rapid and easy endoscopic organ wall closure, we hypothesized that it might be a useful tool to close GI fistulae.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Four consecutive patients with GI fistulae.

INTERVENTIONS

In all patients, a 12-mm OTSC, in combination with the dedicated twin grasper, anchor device, or endoscopic suction, was used to facilitate endoscopic closure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

In 2 cases, OTSCs allowed complete closure of a posttraumatic esophagopulmonary fistula and a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula. Leak tests and follow-up examination demonstrated complete leakproof closures. In 1 esophagopulmonary fistula and 1 jejunocutaneous fistula, the initial closure attempts using OTSCs were not successful because of chronic fibrotic changes and scarring at the fistula site. Both OTSCs were removed by using an endoscopic grasping forceps. The mean procedure time was 54 minutes (range 24-93 minutes). There were no procedure-related complications.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The OTSC seems to be a feasible device to close chronic fistulae of the GI tract. It can achieve leakproof, full-thickness closure of transmural defects. Nevertheless, in circumstances of severe fibrosis and scarring, complete incorporation of the defect into the applicator cap and successful OTSC application might not be possible.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection and defect closure in the colon

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is a minimally invasive method for en bloc resection of GI lesions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of a grasp-and-snare technique for eFTR combined with an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) for defect closure.

DESIGN

Nonsurvival animal study.

SETTING

Animal laboratory.

ANIMALS

Fourteen female domestic pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

The eFTR was performed in porcine colons using a novel tissue anchor in combination with a standard monofilament snare and 14 mm OTSC. In the first group (n = 20), closure of the colonic defects with OTSC was attempted after the resection. In the second group (n = 8), an endoloop was used to secure the resection base before eFTR was performed.

RESULTS

In the first group (n = 20), eFTR specimens ranged from 2.4 to 5.5 cm in diameter. Successful closure was achieved in 9 out of 20 cases. Mean burst pressure for OTSC closure was 29.2 mm Hg (range, 2-90; SD, 29.92). Injury to adjacent organs occurred in 3 cases. Lumen obstruction due to the OTSC closure occurred in 3 cases. In the second group (n = 8), the diameter of specimens ranged from 1.2 to 2.2 cm. Complete closure was achieved in all cases, with a mean burst pressure of 76.6 mm Hg (range, 35-120; SD, 31). Lumen obstruction due to the endoloop closure occurred in one case. No other complications or injuries were observed in the second group.

LIMITATIONS

Nonsurvival setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic eFTR using the grasp-and-snare technique is feasible in an animal model. Ligation of the resection base with an endoloop before eFTR seems to reduce complication rates and improve closure success and leak test results despite yielding smaller specimens.

Endoscopic mucosal resection with full-thickness closure for difficult polyps: a prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Large flat polyps may be more amenable to endoscopic resection if an endoluminal method for full-thickness closure were available.

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of feasibility of endoluminal full-thickness closure.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, interventional study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients referred to surgery for endoscopically unresectable polyps.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic resection of colon polyps with full-thickness closure of the resection site under laparoscopic observation by using a novel needle and T-tag tissue apposition system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Feasibility and efficacy of tissue apposition with the TAS during procedure and safety at 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients referred with unresectable polyps at initial colonoscopy were enrolled. Five patients had successful endoscopic polypectomy and did not require closure of the resulting defect. In 6 patients, the polyp could not be resected endoscopically and surgical resection was performed. Use of the TAS was attempted in 8 and successfully deployed in 7 patients; there was 1 device malfunction. Deployment of the tags through the needle could be performed more safely under laparoscopic guidance when the resection site was visible from the peritoneal cavity. The location of the tags could not be safely determined when the needle was directed toward the retroperitoneal or mesenteric site. There were no long-term complications. Colonoscopy at a 3-month follow-up showed normal healed mucosa with the sutures and anchoring devices in place.

LIMITATIONS

Small number of patients, single-center feasibility study without control arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Full-thickness endoluminal closure of large polypectomy sites in humans is feasible for selected difficult polyps. Closure should be performed with concurrent laparoscopic guidance to maximize safety. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00553436.).

Colonoscopic perforation: Incidence, risk factors, management and outcome

This review discusses the incidence, risk factors, management and outcome of colonoscopic perforation (CP). The incidence of CP ranges from 0.016% to 0.2% following diagnostic colonoscopies and could be up to 5% following some colonoscopic interventions. The perforations are frequently related to therapeutic colonoscopies and are associated with patients of advanced age or with multiple comorbidities. Management of CP is mainly based on patients’ clinical grounds and their underlying colorectal diseases. Current therapeutic approaches include conservative management (bowel rest plus the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics), endoscopic management, and operative management (open or laparoscopic approach). The applications of each treatment are discussed. Overall outcomes of patients with CP are also addressed.

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery 2009: what is the future for the gastroenterologist?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In order to predict whether the gastroenterologist will have a role in the rapidly developing field of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), it is helpful to examine the new developments in this field. Our goal in this review is to examine the recent developments in the field and study the gastroenterologists' role to best make this prediction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Perhaps the most significant development in the field of NOTES has been the favorable patient and physician preferences for NOTES. There is evidence that patients would prefer NOTES cholecystectomy to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The most common reason for this choice appears to be the lack of pain and visible scar. Another very significant development has been the reality of human NOTES procedures. Multiple centers have reported human NOTES procedures, including transgastric appendectomies, transgastric liver biopsies, transgastric tubal ligation and transvaginal cholecystectomy without major complications. Gastroenterologists' expertise with flexible endoscope was critical in the above cases. Recently, a few publications have also shown how gastroenterologists with expertise in endosonography can have a role in affirming safe access.

SUMMARY

Although no one can predict with certainty where the field of NOTES will be in 1 year, it seems likely that gastroenterologist involvement will be necessary and advancements in this field will be applicable and diffuse into our daily practice.

Colonoscopic full-thickness resection of the colon in a porcine model as a prelude to endoscopic surgery of difficult colon polyps: a novel technique (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopic full-thickness resection (CFTR) of the colon may obviate the need for surgical resection of benign lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an animal model for CFTR of the colon followed by endoscopic suture closure with through-the-endoscope devices.

DESIGN

Pilot study.

SETTING

University medical center.

ANIMALS

Twenty pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

A 2-cm circular area was resected on the antimesenteric side of the colon (phase 1, n = 10) and on the mesenteric side (phase 2, n = 10) by using an insulated tip knife cut followed by the use of a grasping forceps and a snare to resect and retrieve the specimen. The tissue apposition system was used to close the defect.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Resection and closure times were recorded. The animals were euthanized at 2 weeks and examined for peritonitis, adhesions, wound healing, and T-tag injury to adjacent viscera.

RESULTS

The CFTR was successful in all 20 attempts. The median resection time was 6 minutes (range 2.5-35 minutes). Suture closure was successful in 19 animals. It took a median time of 41 minutes (range 21-125 minutes) and 4 sutures to close the defect. Eighteen animals survived without clinical signs of distress; there was a well-healed scar without peritonitis or distant adhesions on necropsy at 2 weeks. One animal failed to thrive, and necropsy revealed mild peritonitis, small abscesses, distant adhesions, and a 2-mm hole at the suture site. Two of the 132 T-tags were inserted in the adjacent viscera.

LIMITATIONS

Colon resection in the proximal colon was not studied.

CONCLUSIONS

In this animal model, CFTR of the colon followed by suture closure can be accomplished successfully by using through-the-endoscope devices.

Endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal leaks

Surgery has been the mainstay of therapy in patients with gastrointestinal perforations. This paradigm started to shift with the development of techniques for endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal perforations. A detailed review of the literature on this subject, along with a commentary on practical aspects in the management of patients with gastrointestinal leaks, is provided here.

[Non-randomised, comparative, prospective study of transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy versus transparietal laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

INTRODUCTION

We present a non-randomised comparative study of two patients series followed up prospectively, in which convention laparoscopic cholecystectomy is compared with transvaginal cholecystectomy, a hybrid transluminal endoscopic procedure, with the objective of assessing the clinical safety of the procedures and its efficacy in the resolution of cholelithiasis.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A non-randomised prospective clinical series of 40 female patients, operated on for cholelithiasis using endoscopic surgery, 20 with a conventional laparoscopic approach and 20 using a transvaginal endoscopic approach. Surgical wound infection, urinary infection, evisceration, eventration, mortality and other complications.

RESULTS

Scheduled operations were performed on the 40 patients as indicated. There were no complications during the operations. There was no mortality associated with the procedures and there was only one post-surgical complication, a urinary tract infection in one patient operated on by the transvaginal approach. The mean follow up was the same in both groups (9 months). The mean hospital stay was less than 0.8 days in both groups. The duration of the surgery was longer in the transvaginal approach group, with a mean of 69.5 min, compared to 46.2 min in the laparoscopy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the cosmetic benefit is obvious, no differences were found as regards parietal problems in this series. The duration of the transvaginal surgery is higher than that of the transparietal, but the times of both are acceptable. In this study, the non-inferiority in the safety and efficacy of the transvaginal approach is able to be assessed.

Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, NOTES, and minilaparoscopy: analysis of a prospective clinical series

INTRODUCTION

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) makes it possible to perform intraperitoneal surgical procedures with a minimal number of access points in the abdominal wall. It is not yet possible to perform these interventions without the help of abdominal wall entryways, so these procedures are hybrids, a fusion of minilaparoscopy and transluminal endoscopic surgery. In this paper we present a prospective clinical series of 15 patients who underwent transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis.

METHODS

This was a prospective clinical series of 15 consecutive female patients, nonrandomly chosen and without a control group, who underwent a fusion transvaginal NOTES and minilaparoscopy procedure with two entryways for cholelithiasis. One was umbilical and measured 5 mm in diameter, and the other was in the right upper quadrant and measured 3 mm in diameter.

RESULTS

The scheduled surgical intervention was performed on the 15 patients in whom it had been indicated. There were no intraoperative complications. One patient had mild hematuria that resolved in less than 12 h; there were no other complications after average follow-up of 124 days. Nine patients were discharged in 24 h, and two were discharged less than 12 h after the procedure.

DISCUSSION

Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy is a good surgical model for minimally invasive surgery, a combination of NOTES and minilaparoscopy. It can be performed in surgical settings where laparoscopy is practised regularly, using the instruments normally used for endoscopy and laparoscopic surgery. Owing to the reproducibility of the intervention and the ease of vaginal closure, hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy will permit further development of NOTES in the future.

N.O.T.E.S.: the progression of a novel and emerging technique

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is the latest and perhaps most significant innovation in surgery since Phillipe Mouret of France performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987. This new "minimum-invasive" concept that promises scar-free surgery is steadily gathering momentum. It is another milestone in our quest to eliminate surgical trauma, speed patient recovery time and decrease surgical wound-related complications. On 22 July 2005, the Natural Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research (NOSCAR) published a white paper highlighting the barriers to NOTES development, which included the need for appropriate selection of access points, effective closure of the enterotomy site, innovative tools, stable platforms and improved endoscopic orientation. These are just some of the many issues that need to be resolved before the NOTES concept and technique could become a common feature of modern surgery. The publication of the white paper ushered in the beginning of multiple research projects using animal models to test the application of NOTES and its newly developed instruments. The success in animal models was followed by several highly selected successful human trials. National and international surgical innovation departments should now be created where medical industry personnel including inventors, designers and engineers can work together with the medical and surgical providers to address all the limitations affecting NOTES progress.

Endoscopic colotomy closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery using a T-fastener prototype in comparison to conventional laparoscopic suture closure

BACKGROUND

Safe and efficient endoscopic closure of a colotomy is essential for transcolonic peritoneal access or endoscopic full-thickness resection of the colon, if open or laparoscopic surgery is to be avoided.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the feasibility and safety of colotomy closure with the newly developed Tissue Approximation System (TAS, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.) to conventional laparoscopic suture closure.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized survival animal study involving 16 pigs.

SETTING

University hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

Pigs were randomized for closure of a 2- to 3-cm full-thickness colotomy with the TAS or with a conventional laparoscopic running suture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Success of colotomy closure, time of colotomy closure, postoperative infection, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Colotomies were successfully closed in all animals. Median closure time (range) was 39.5 minutes (25-95 min) in the TAS group and 23 minutes (16-40 min) in the laparoscopic group (P = .0134). There were no postoperative infections or complications.

LIMITATIONS

Closure with the TAS was performed under laparoscopic vision. There was no control group without closure of the colotomy site.

CONCLUSIONS

Colotomies are safely closed with the TAS with comparable results to laparoscopic closure. The TAS may serve as a useful tool to close full-thickness colon defects or colotomy sites made for transluminal endoscopic procedures.

Closure of a gastrotomy after transgastric tubal ligation by using the Eagle Claw VII: a survival experiment in a porcine model (with video)

BACKGROUND

Transgastric access to the peritoneal cavity presents new opportunities for novel endoscopic surgery. Secure closure of the gastrotomy site is critical to the success of transgastric endoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety and efficacy of closure of a gastrotomy by using the Eagle Claw VII endoscopic suturing device after transgastric bilateral tubal ligation.

DESIGN

A prospective survival study in a porcine model with ten 30-kg pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

The gastrotomies were made by using a needle-knife and balloon dilation. Bilateral fallopian tube ligation was performed with detachable snares, and the tubes were transected by using the needle-knife. The gastrotomies were closed with endoscopic suturing by using the Eagle Claw VII.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Included the survival of the pigs, security of the closure, number of plicating sutures used, operative time, peritoneal contamination, and histopathologic confirmation of the full-thickness healing of the gastrotomy.

RESULTS

Transgastric fallopian-tube ligation was performed in 10 pigs, and all of the gastrotomies were successfully closed by using the Eagle Claw VII endoscopic suturing device. The operative time for bilateral tubal ligation was 38.2 minutes (range 18-50 minutes), whereas, the operative time for gastrotomy closure was 25.5 minutes (range 15-35 minutes). Three endoscopic sutures were necessary to achieve a secure gastrotomy closure. All the pigs survived and tolerated a full diet 24 hours after the operation. A postmortem confirmed full-thickness healing for all gastrotomies, with no evidence of leakage. One pig had an overtube-related esophageal perforation, which was successfully managed with endoscopic clip closure.

LIMITATIONS

The porcine gastric wall is thicker than the human gastric wall, and the posterior wall of the porcine stomach becomes the anterior-inferior wall after gaseous distention. Hence, all the gastrotomies were made through the posterior wall. The tissue tolerance and healing of the porcine stomach may be different from that of the human stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic suturing by using the Eagle Claw VII device is a feasible method for gastrotomy closure after a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery procedure.

Air and fluid leak tests after NOTES procedures: a pilot study in a live porcine model (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Transluminal access site closure remains a major challenge in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to develop in vivo leak tests for evaluation of the integrity of transgastric access closure.

SETTINGS

Survival experiments on 12 50-kg pigs.

DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS

After a standardized transgastric approach to the peritoneal cavity and peritoneoscopy, the gastric wall incision was closed with T-bars (Wilson-Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC) deployed on both sides of the incision and then cinched together. Gastrotomy closure was assessed with air and fluid leak tests. The animals were observed for 1 week and then underwent endoscopic evaluation and necropsy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

(1) Leak-proof closure of the gastric wall incision. (2) Gastric incision healing 1 week after the procedure.

RESULTS

The mean intraperitoneal pressure increased 10.7 +/- 3.7 mm Hg during gastric insufflation when the air leak test was performed before closure compared with 0.9 +/- 0.8 mm Hg after transmural closure of the transgastric access site with T-bars (P < .001). Fluid leak tests demonstrated no leakage of liquid contrast from the stomach into the peritoneal cavity after closure. Necropsy in 1 week confirmed completeness of the gastric closure in all animals with full-thickness healing and no spillage of the gastric contents into the peritoneal cavity.

LIMITATIONS

Leak tests were only evaluated on an animal model.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluid and air leak tests are simple techniques to evaluate in vivo the adequacy of the transluminal access site closure after NOTES procedures. Leak-proof gastric closure resulted in adequate tissue approximation and full-thickness healing of the gastric wall incision.

Endoscopic closure of colon perforation compared to surgery in a porcine model: a randomized controlled trial (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic closure of inadvertent or intentional colon perforations might be valuable if comparable to surgical closure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic closure of a 4-cm colon perforation in a porcine model with surgical closure in a multicenter study.

SETTING

University hospitals in the United States and Europe.

DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS

After creating a 4-cm linear colon perforation, the animals were randomized to either endoscopic or surgical closure. The total procedure time from the beginning of perforation to the completion of procedure was measured. The animals were euthanized after 2 weeks to evaluate healing, unless there was a complication.

RESULTS

Fifty-four animals were randomized to either surgical or endoscopic closure of colon perforation. Eight animals developed complications, and 7 of these were euthanized before 2 weeks. Twenty-three animals in each group survived for 2 weeks. Surgical closure of the perforation was successful in all animals in that group, and endoscopic closure was successful in 25 of the 27 animals. The median procedure time was shorter in the surgery group compared to the endoscopy group (35 vs 44 minutes, P = .016). Peritonitis, local adhesions, and leak test results were comparable in both groups. Distant adhesions were less frequent in the endoscopic closure group (26.1% vs 56.5%, P = .03). Five of the 186 T-tags (2.7%) were noted in the adjacent viscera.

LIMITATION

This porcine study does not mimic clean colon perforation in humans; it mimics dirty colon perforation in humans.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic closure of a 4-cm colon perforation was comparable to surgery, and this technique can be potentially used for closure of intentional or inadvertent colon perforations.

Nephrectomy and natural orifice translumenal endoscopy (NOTES): transvaginal, transgastric, transrectal, and transvesical approaches

This paper outlines recent developments in the field of natural orifice translumenal endosurgery (NOTES) in urology and nephrectomy from the perspective of a flexible endoscopist. The history of transvaginal extraction of kidney specimens using rigid laparoscopic instruments and early studies of transvaginal nephrectomy as a precursor of NOTES are reviewed. Transgastric approaches to nephrectomy using flexible instruments and transvesical hybrid approaches to nephrectomy and other intra-abdominal procedures including cholecystectomy and transvesical lung biopsy are outlined, as are other experimental approaches including transrectal kidney removal. The paper reviews the rationale for a NOTES approach to abdominal surgery and discusses recent human studies. The limitations of NOTES and need for better instrumentation and more studies are stressed.

Endoscopic closure of transmural bladder wall perforations

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, intraperitoneal bladder perforations caused by trauma or iatrogenic interventions have been treated by open or laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, transvesical access to the peritoneal cavity has been reported to be feasible and useful for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) but would be enhanced by a reliable method of closing the vesicotomy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of an endoscopic closure method for vesical perforations using a flexible, small-diameter endoscopic suturing kit in a survival porcine model.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This pilot study was performed at the University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, using six anesthetized female pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

Closure of a full-thickness longitudinal incision in the bladder dome (up to 10 mm in four animals and up to 20 mm in two animals) with the endoscopic suturing kit using one to three absorbable stitches.

MEASUREMENTS

The acute quality of sealing was immediately tested by distending the bladder with methylene-blue dye under laparoscopic control (in two animals). Without a bladder catheter, the animals were monitored daily for 2 wk, and a necropsy examination was performed to check for the signs of peritonitis, wound dehiscence, and quality of healing.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Endoscopic closure of bladder perforation was carried out easily and quickly in all animals. The laparoscopic view revealed no acute leak of methylene-blue dye after distension of the bladder. After recovery from anaesthesia, the pigs began to void normally, and no adverse event occurred. Postmortem examination revealed complete healing of vesical incision with no signs of infection or adhesions in the peritoneal cavity. No limitations have yet been studied clinically.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility and the safety of endoscopic closure of vesical perforations with an endoscopic suturing kit in a survival porcine model. This study provides support for further studies using endoscopic closure of the bladder which may lead to a new era in management of bladder rupture and adoption of the transvesical port in NOTES procedures.

The eagle or the snake: platforms for NOTES and radical endoscopic therapy

It has only been about 3 years since natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) first began to gather the attention of the medical and surgical community at large. The concepts behind NOTES, however, have been under development for almost a decade. It is important to revisit some basic concepts regarding therapeutic flexible endoscopy and in the process understand the fundamental premises on which a sound technology development program for NOTES should be built. This article provides such a review and emphasizes general principles rather than specific embodiments, which are very much at a nascent stage.

Techniques for transanal access to the peritoneal cavity

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents a burgeoning but still largely experimental field. For surgeries involving the upper abdominal organs, the transanal approach promises to provide a more direct route in contrast to the often cumbersome retroflexion typically required with the transgastric approach. The potential disadvantages of the transanal route are also significant and include issues of sterility, the risk of inadvertent trauma to adjacent organs during transmural puncture, and the risk of colonic wall shearing. This article reviews the evolution of transanal access to the peritoneal cavity, highlights the various techniques that have been used for transanal access and closure, and discusses in further detail the relative advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal leaks

Endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal perforations, fistulas, and anastomotic dehiscence is technically feasible. Endoluminal closure of the instrumental perforations of the gastrointestinal tract can be accomplished immediately after the recognition of perforation, while avoiding the delay of arranging surgery and the trauma associated with thoracotomy or laparotomy. In addition, endoscopic closure should be considered in patients with anastomotic dehiscence and chronic fistulas as this may avoid the risk associated with reoperation. The outcome of closure depends on the technical expertise in the proper selection and use of various endoluminal closure options. Training of the endoscopists in the use of this novel technology will enhance the quality of care of our patients.