Ischemic colitis as a cause of severe hematochezia: risk factors and outcomes compared with other colon diagnoses

Surgical prevalence and outcomes in ischemic colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study reviews the literature to examine the proportion of patients requiring surgical management in ischemic colitis (IC) and identify surgical outcomes.

METHOD

A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted in accordance with the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. English language studies and adult patients were included. Studies with fewer than 10 patients, and IC post aortic or cardiac surgery was excluded. We present our systematic review and meta-analysis with pooled proportions of right sided IC distribution and prevalence of surgical treatment.

RESULTS

23 studies with a total of 12,844 patients were included in the systematic review, with 19 studies and 12,420 patients included in the meta-analysis. Four studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to only including specific cohorts of patients-two with cocaine induced colitis, one with phlebosclerotic colitis, and one with IC associated with acute myocardial infarction. The pooled proportion of right sided IC distribution was 15% (CI 14%-17%, p < 0.001), whilst the pooled proportion of surgical management of IC was 15% (CI 13%-16% p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of surgical management of IC is rare. Right sided IC is associated with higher mortality and higher rates of surgical management. Reporting of surgical outcomes is scant.

Prior appendectomy and cerebral infarction as potential risk factors for recurrent ischemic colitis: A retrospective observational study

Background and Aim

Ischemic colitis (IC) is a benign disease associated with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding and frequent recurrence. While several studies have investigated risk factors for IC onset, few have assessed the risk factors for recurrent IC. This study aimed to identify risk factors for recurrent IC.

Methods

Potential risk factors for recurrence were assessed by examining medical records and laboratory findings in this single-center retrospective study. We extracted the following data from the patients' medical records: patient characteristics, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory findings, method of treatment, length of hospital stay, disease course, and the frequency of IC morbidities. Patients with IC were selected from a total of 439 312 patients over an 11-year period. Patients were divided into recurrent and nonrecurrent IC groups.

Results

In total, 225 patients met the diagnostic criteria for IC during the specified study period; of these, 204 patients (90.7%) and 21 patients (9.3%) were included in the nonrecurrent and recurrent IC groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed a significant association between IC recurrence and both cerebral infarction (P = 0.008, odds ratio [OR] = 6.3) and history of appendectomy (P = 0.0005, OR = 6.2). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time for all patients was 1556 (353-2768) days; this was much longer than the median (IQR) time to recurrence of 291 (64-907) days in the recurrent IC group.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that prior cerebral infarction and appendicectomy may be risk factors for IC recurrence.

The use of surgical intervention for lower gastrointestinal bleeding and its association with clinical outcomes and resource use

BACKGROUND

To assess the use of surgical intervention for lower gastrointestinal bleeding and evaluate its associated factors.

METHODS

The 2016 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify non-elective adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for lower gastrointestinal bleeding. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes were used to ascertain patient characteristics, including signs of hemodynamic instability, potential lower gastrointestinal bleed source, and transfusion of blood products, as well as endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical intervention. Multivariable regression analyses were used to elucidate factors associated with operative management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and evaluate its associated mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 364,495 patients, 1.7% underwent an operation for lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Compared to those managed conservatively, patients who underwent surgical intervention more commonly had diverticular-related bleeding, signs of hypovolemia, and less frequently underwent endoscopic intervention. After the adjustment of patient and hospital characteristics, ischemic colitis (adjusted odds ratio 7.5, 95% confidence interval 1.8-30.9, ref: hemorrhoids), hemodynamic instability (adjusted odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5-2.0), and angiographic embolization (adjusted odds ratio 4.9, 95% confidence interval 3.9-6.0, ref: no endoscopic/radiologic intervention) were associated with greater odds of surgical intervention. Additionally, surgical intervention portended greater odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence interval 4.5-8.5), a longer length of stay (8.5 days, 95% confidence interval 8.0-9.0), and greater hospitalization cost ($29.1K, 95% confidence interval 26.7K-31.5K).

CONCLUSION

Operative management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding is rare and associated with significant morbidity and mortality compared to those managed conservatively. However, when surgical intervention is indicated, preoperative patient characteristics should be used to identify those at greater risk of an operation to facilitate early surgical consultation and inform expectations during the perioperative period.

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of hospitalised patients with ischemic colitis with different degrees of haematochezia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Based on the literature, haematochezia is associated with a benign clinical course of ischaemic colitis. However, most cases in the literature presented mild haematochezia associated with ischaemic colitis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of different degrees of haematochezia on the clinical outcomes of ischaemic colitis.

METHODS

Patients were divided into nonhaematochezia, mild-haematochezia, and severe-haematochezia cohorts stratified by the degree of haematochezia. The clinical characteristics and prognoses were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Haematochezia cohort (n = 89) was associated with a lower rate of severe illness (25% vs. 52%, P = 0.001), lower rate of isolated right colon ischaemia (7% vs. 28%, P = 0.001), lower surgery rates (13% vs. 36%, P = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (12 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001) compared with nonhaematochezia cohort (n = 50). Severe-haematochezia cohort (n = 11) had a higher frequency of severe illness (73% vs. 18%, P < 0.001), higher surgical intervention rate (55% vs. 6%, P < 0.001), higher nonsurgical complication rate, higher in-hospital mortality (45% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and longer hospital stay (28 vs. 10  days, P = 0.001), compared with mild-haematochezia cohort (n = 78). Additionally, in-hospital mortality (45% vs. 6%, P = 0.003) and nonsurgical complication rate were higher in the severe-haematochezia than in the nonhaematochezia cohort. However, the three cohorts had comparable prognoses for long-term survival and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild haematochezia was related to a benign clinical course of ischaemic colitis, while lack of haematochezia or severe haematochezia was associated with worse hospitalisation outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Early vs Elective Colonoscopy for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy and safety of early colonoscopy on outcomes of patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB).

METHODS

We performed an open-label study at 15 hospitals in Japan of 170 patients with ALGIB randomly assigned (1:1) to groups that underwent early colonoscopy (within 24 hours of initial visit to the hospital) or elective colonoscopy (24-96 hours after hospital admission). The primary outcome was identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH). Secondary outcomes were rebleeding within 30 days, endoscopic treatment success, need for transfusion, length of stay, thrombotic events within 30 days, death within 30 days, and adverse events.

RESULTS

SRH were identified in 17 of 79 patients (21.5%) in the early colonoscopy group vs 17 of 80 patients (21.3%) in the elective colonoscopy group (difference, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -12.5 to 13.0; P = .967). Rebleeding within 30 days of hospital admission occurred in 15.3% of patients in the early colonoscopy group and 6.7% of patients in the elective colonoscopy group (difference, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, -1.4 to 18.7); there were no significant differences between groups in successful endoscopic treatment rate, transfusion rate, length of stay, thrombotic events, or death within 30 days. The adverse event of hemorrhagic shock occurred during bowel preparation in no patient in the early group vs 2 patients (2.5%) in the elective colonoscopy group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized controlled study, we found that colonoscopy within 24 hours after hospital admission did not increase SRH or reduce rebleeding compared with colonoscopy at 24-96 hours in patients with ALGIB. ClinicalTrials.gov, Numbers: UMIN000021129 and NCT03098173.

Early Endoscopy Is Associated with Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Ischemic Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Providing diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is a salient investigative modality for ischemic bowel disease (IB). As studies on the role of endoscopic timing on the outcomes of IB are lacking, we sought to clarify this association.

METHODS

After identifying 18-to-90-year-old patients with a primary diagnosis of IB from the 2012-2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we grouped them based on timing of endoscopy into three: early (n = 9268), late (n = 3515), and no endoscopy (n = 18,452). We explored the determinants of receiving early endoscopy, the impact of endoscopic timing on outcomes (mortality and 13 others), and the impact of the type of endoscopy (colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy) on these outcomes among the early group (SAS 9.4).

RESULTS

Less likely to receive early endoscopy were Blacks compared to Whites (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.81 95% CI [0.70-0.94]), and individuals on Medicaid, Medicare, and uninsured compared to the privately insured group (aOR 0.80 [0.71-0.91], 0.70 [0.58-0.84], and 0.68 [0.56-0.83]). Compared to the late and no endoscopy groups, patients with early endoscopy had less mortality (aOR 0.53 [0.35-0.80] and 0.09 [0.07-0.12]), shorter length of stay (LOS, 4.64 [4.43-4.87] days vs. 8.87 [8.40-9.37] and 6.62 [6.52-7.13] days), lower total hospital cost (THC, $41,055 [$37,995-$44,361] vs. $72,598 [$66,768-$78,937] and $68,737 [$64,028-$73,793]), and better outcomes. Similarly, among those who received early endoscopy, colonoscopy had better outcomes than sigmoidoscopy for mortality, THC, LOS, and adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Early endoscopy, especially colonoscopy, is associated with better clinical outcomes and decreased healthcare utilization in IB. Unfortunately, there are disparities against Blacks, and non-privately insured individuals in receiving early endoscopy.

A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the identification rate of stigmata of recent hemorrhage and rebleeding rate between early and elective colonoscopy in outpatient-onset acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

The clinical benefit of early colonoscopy within 24 h of arrival in patients with severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) remains controversial. This trial will compare early colonoscopy (performed within 24 h) versus elective colonoscopy (performed between 24 and 96 h) to examine the identification rate of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) in ALGIB patients. We hypothesize that, compared with elective colonoscopy, early colonoscopy increases the identification of SRH and subsequently improves clinical outcomes.

Methods

This trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial examining the superiority of early colonoscopy over elective colonoscopy (standard therapy) in ALGIB patients. The primary outcome measure is the identification of SRH. Secondary outcomes include 30-day rebleeding, success of endoscopic treatment, need for additional endoscopic examination, need for interventional radiology, need for surgery, need for transfusion during hospitalization, length of stay, 30-day thrombotic events, 30-day mortality, preparation-related adverse events, and colonoscopy-related adverse events. The sample size will enable detection of a 9% SRH rate in elective colonoscopy patients and a SRH rate of ≥ 26% in early colonoscopy patients with a risk of type I error of 5% and a power of 80%.

Discussion

This trial will provide high-quality data on the benefits and risks of early colonoscopy in ALGIB patients.

Trial registration

UMIN-CTR Identifier, UMIN000021129. Registered on 21 February 2016; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03098173. Registered on 24 March 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2558-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Patients Treated With an Intensive Protocol

Background

In recent years major advances have been made in the management of patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) treated with an intensive protocol.

Methods

We analyzed the medical records of 528 patients with ALGIB. All patients after hemodynamic stabilization underwent colonoscopy during the first 24 h of hospitalization and capsule enteroscopy when needed. Patients with massive ongoing bleeding underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA), and when active bleeding was detected embolization was immediately performed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 70.2 ± 14.6 years and 271 (51.3%) of them were men. At least one comorbidity was present in 464 patients (87.9%), cardiovascular disease in 266 (50.4%), while 158 (30%) patients were on antiplatelet drugs and 96 (18.2%) on anticoagulants. The most common causes of bleeding were diverticulosis (19.7%) and ischemic colitis (19.3%). Thirty-six patients (6.9%) had small intestinal bleeding. In 117 patients (22.2%) active bleeding or recent bleeding stigmata were found and in 82 of them (92.1%) endoscopic hemostasis was applied. Embolization was performed in 10 (1.9%) and was successful in seven (70%) cases, while surgical hemostasis was required in only six (1.1%) cases. Forty-four (8.3%) patients had a rebleeding episode, and 13 patients died with an overall mortality of 2.5%.

Conclusions

Management of ALGIB based on an intensive protocol is safe and effective. The bleeding source can be identified in most cases with a favorable outcome.

Patients' comorbidities reduce the clinical value of emergency colonoscopy: results of a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Urgent endoscopy is often used to diagnose and sometimes treat acute upper gastrointestinal syndromes (hemorrhage, toxic ingestion, and occlusion). However, its suitability concerning the management of lower gastrointestinal conditions in emergency circumstances is controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 We studied the role of emergency colonoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of all consecutive patients presenting with acute lower gastrointestinal symptoms referred to our hospital on an emergency basis. All patients were first managed by physicians from the emergency room and/or the intensive care unit (ICU); the treatments included fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion, and antibiotic or cardiotonic as needed. Bowel cleansing was performed to purge the colon of clots, stool, and blood when clinically possible; alternatively, a bowel enema was used. Patients only underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan prior to the colonoscopy in clinically relevant situations. Colonoscopy was performed within 6 - 36 hours after hospitalization or the beginning of the clinical symptoms (hemorrhage, sepsis, colon distension) or occlusion, as assessed by abdominal CT scan.

RESULTS

 From 2010 to 2015, 603 patients underwent urgent colonoscopy; among them, 214 (36 %) presented with lower GI bleeding, while 264 (44 %) had symptoms suggestive of intestinal ischemia; almost half (49 %, n = 295) of the patients were hospitalized in the ICU. Patients received therapies, such as clips (15 %), epinephrine injections (5 %), bipolar coagulation (7 %), or devolvulation (3 %) using colonoscopy or antibiotic therapy when needed. No perforation was observed after colonoscopy and only three cases of hemorrhage recurrence were documented as complications after the procedure. Overall, 192 patients died within 1 month after colonoscopy due to four independent risk situations, as follows: septic shock, heart transplantation, multiorgan failure, and ischemic colitis. Only 67 (35 %) underwent urgent intestinal surgery when ischemic colitis was identified, and this did not have a significant effect on the mortality rate.

CONCLUSIONS

 Urgent bedside colonoscopy is feasible and safe for routine use. The highest advantage was observed in patients with red blood hemorrhage, diarrhea, and colon distension when symptoms were not associated with multiorgane failure, heart transplantation, or septic shock. As revealed by colonoscopy and pathological features, ischemic colitis is associated with a bad prognosis, and patients experience a higher rate of early mortality regardless of whether they undergo urgent colon surgery.

The predictors of the severity of ischaemic colitis: a systematic review of 2823 patients from 22 studies

AIM

The study reviews the literature related to ischaemic colitis (IC) as the evidence base to identify factors predicting severity.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on the predictors of the severity of IC. Severe IC or adverse outcome of IC was defined as a patient requiring surgery or who died. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to 15 January 2015. Manual searches of reference lists from potentially relevant papers and meetings were also performed.

RESULTS

In all, 22 studies involving 2823 patients were identified; 19 were case series, two were case-control studies and one was a cohort study. The overall adverse outcome rate was 22.0% (620/2823). The prognostic predictors for surgery or mortality which were most frequently reported included right sided IC, peritonitis, shock or arterial hypotension (< 90 mmHg), male gender, tachycardia and lack of rectal bleeding. Thirteen studies relating to the right colon from which data could be extracted were further analysed. The right colon was involved in 277 cases, with an incidence of adverse outcomes of 48.4% (134/277), while in the non-right colonic involvement group the incidence was significantly lower at 12.1% (142/1175) (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of adverse outcome in patients with IC remains high. Male gender, tachycardia, lack of rectal bleeding, peritonitis, shock or arterial hypotension (< 90 mmHg) and right sided IC are predictors of poor prognosis. Right-sided IC, shock or arterial hypotension (< 90 mmHg) and signs of peritonitis may be the most significant predictors of severity.

Abdominal Fat Accumulation, as Measured by Computed Tomography, Increases the Risk of Ischemic Colitis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Visceral fat contributes to insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. We retrospectively investigated whether abdominal fat accumulation, as measured by computed tomography, is a risk of ischemic colitis and related clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outpatient-onset ischemic colitis patients (n = 58) and age- and sex-matched controls (n = 58) underwent colonoscopy and computed tomography. Associations between body mass index, visceral adipose tissue area, subcutaneous adipose tissue area, and ischemic colitis were estimated using odds ratios adjusted for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, ischemic colitis was significantly associated with subcutaneous adipose tissue area (P for trend 0.030) and marginally associated with visceral adipose tissue area (P for trend 0.094), but was not associated with body mass index (P for trend 0.460). The adjusted odds ratios for the highest quartile of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in ischemic colitis were 3.48 (1.06-11.4) and 2.43 (0.74-8.00), respectively, compared with the lowest quartile. When body mass index was considered simultaneously, ischemic colitis remained associated with subcutaneous adipose tissue (P for trend 0.016) and visceral adipose tissue (P for trend 0.077). No significant differences were noted between any of the obesity indices and the distribution type of colitis, blood transfusion requirement, or length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal fat accumulation measured by computed tomography, but not body mass index, was associated with outpatient-onset ischemic colitis. Ischemic colitis remained associated with abdominal fat, even when body mass index was simultaneously considered. However, clinical outcomes of ischemic colitis were not associated with abdominal fat accumulation.

Natural history of outpatient-onset ischemic colitis compared with other lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a long-term cohort study

PURPOSES

The long-term clinical course of outpatient-onset ischemic colitis remains unknown. Our aims are to elucidate the in- and out-of-hospital clinical outcomes of ischemic colitis and compare them with those of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB).

METHOD

A cohort of 370 outpatients was hospitalized for ischemic colitis (n = 57) or other LGIB (n = 313). All patients had undergone colonoscopy. During hospitalization, the need for transfusion or interventions, further bleeding, mortality, and length of hospital stay were measured. After discharge, long-term recurrence and mortality were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Colonoscopy revealed that 88% of ischemic colitis cases were left sided. Compared with other LGIB, ischemic colitis cases had significantly lower transfusion requirements (p < 0.01), further bleeding (p = 0.02), endoscopic intervention (p < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (p = 0.03). No significant differences between the groups were noted in the need for surgery, angiographic procedures, or mortality during hospitalization. During a mean follow-up of 22 months, rebleeding was significantly lower (log-rank test; p < 0.01) in ischemic colitis cases (5.3%) than in other LGIB cases (19.4%) after discharge. During the mean follow-up period of 29 months, 1 patient (1.8%) with ischemic colitis and 18 patients (5.8%) with other LGIB died (log-rank test; p = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient-onset ischemic colitis patients usually had left-sided colitis, recovered with conservative short-term treatment and had lower transfusion requirements and further bleeding compared with other LGIB patients. After discharge, patients with outpatient-onset ischemic colitis had lower recurrence over the long term than other LGIB patients.

Ischemic colitis: A forgotten entity. Results of a retrospective study in 118 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to document our 6-year experiences in identifying the clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, risk factors and the outcomes of patients with ischemic colitis (IC) in a community hospital setting.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who were diagnosed with IC from 2007 to 2013 in two community hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinical characteristics, laboratory results, radiological, endoscopic and histological evidence, anatomic location of the lesion, comorbidities, concomitant use of drugs, and so on, were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with IC was identified, most were elderly individuals with a female predominance. The most common symptoms were abdominal pain, rectal bleeding and diarrhea. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus were the most common comorbidities. Erythema, edema and erosions/ulcerations were the most common endoscopic findings. Left colon was the most affected location of lesion (84.8%), and there was one case of pancolitis. The descending colon was the most common affected segment, while rectum was the least affected segment. Severe IC occurred in 12.7% of the patients. Death within 30 days from the diagnosis of the disease occurred in 4.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

IC is majorly occurred in elderly with a female predominance. Cardiovascular disease and its associated risk factors are the most common comorbidities. Left colon is the most affected location of the disease and the overall mortality rate was 4.2%. Physicians should make every effort to identify these patients, especially those with high risks.

Risk factors of recurrent ischemic colitis: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Recurrence of ischemic colitis (IC) has not been studied extensively. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of recurrent IC in the community setting and to identify any risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in two community hospitals. Medical records of patients with IC from January 2007 to January 2013 were reviewed. Demographic details, clinical features, co- morbidities, concomitant use of medications,laboratory studies, imaging findings, endoscopic and histological features, surgery, hospital stay, and death within 30 days were collected. Patients were divided into two groups (recurrent IC group, non-recurrent IC group).

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with IC were identified. IC recurred in 10 patients (8.5%) during the study period. Half of the patients in the recurrent IC group were current smokers as compared to only 18.7% of patients in the non-recurrent group. In the recurrent IC group, 20.0% of patients never smoked as compared to 61.7% in the non-recurrent group (p=0.027).Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was more frequent in the recurrent IC group (40.0% vs. 4.7%; p=0.003). No differences in other clinical symptoms, CT scan findings, comorbidities, endoscopic features, or use of concomitant medications were observed between the two groups. The need for surgical intervention, blood transfusion, intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation,length of hospital stay, and anatomic location of affected segments did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

IC recurred in 8.5% of patients during the six-year study period. Current smoking status and presence of AAA were identifying risk factors for recurrence of IC.

Is CT Angiogram of the Abdominal Vessels Needed following the Diagnosis of Ischemic Colitis? A Multicenter Community Study

Background. CT angiogram is frequently obtained after diagnosis of ischemic colitis (IC). Aims. To investigate the vascular findings of CT angiogram as compared to contrast-enhanced CT scan and whether this modality changes the management or prognosis of IC. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with IC from 2007 to 2013. Results. CT angiogram was performed in 34 patients (28.81%), whereas contrast-enhanced CT scan was performed in 54 patients (45.76%). In CT angiogram group, 8 patients (23.5%) had atherosclerotic changes. Stenosis was found in 12 patients (35.3%) (9: celiac trunk, 3: SMA). Among this group, one patient underwent colectomy and another underwent angioplasty of the celiac trunk who died within 30 days. Among contrast-enhanced CT scan group, 5 patients (9.3%) had atherosclerotic changes. Stenosis was found in 5 patients (9.3%) (3: celiac trunk, 1: SMA, and 1: IMA). Among this group, 3 patients had colectomy and one died within 30 days. There was no statistical difference between both groups in all vascular findings except the stenosis which was higher in CT angiogram group (P = 0.0025). Neither the need for surgery nor all-cause mortality was different between both groups. Conclusion. CT angiogram did not provide any useful findings that altered the management or the prognosis of IC.

MDCT and CT angiography evaluation of rectal bleeding: the role of volume visualization

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews several different causes of rectal bleeding and the role of MDCT in diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Although colonoscopy remains the first-line modality for the diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, colonoscopy may not be possible for unstable patients, and moreover, even for patients who undergo colonoscopy, the examination may still fail to diagnose a cause for bleeding. MDCT with CT angiography and 3D mapping now offers a valuable option for diagnosis, not only for patients whose colonoscopy findings were negative, but also as a first-line screening modality for patients with active bleeding and hemodynamic instability. This article reviews the valuable role of MDCT in the diagnosis of multiple different causes of rectal bleeding, including rectal vascular malformations, rectal varices, ischemic colitis, stercoral colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, radiation proctopathy, infectious colitis, and rectal cancer.

Lower GI bleeding: epidemiology and management

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from the colon is a common reason for hospitalization and is becoming more common in the elderly. While most cases will cease spontaneously, patients with ongoing bleeding or major stigmata of hemorrhage require urgent diagnosis and intervention to achieve definitive hemostasis. Colonoscopy is the primary modality for establishing a diagnosis, risk stratification, and treating some of the most common causes of colonic bleeding, including diverticular hemorrhage which is the etiology in 30% of cases. Other interventions, including angiography and surgery, are usually reserved for instances of bleeding that cannot be stabilized or allow for adequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. We discuss the colonoscopic diagnosis, risk stratification, and definitive treatment of colonic hemorrhage in patients presenting with severe hematochezia.

Ischemic colitis: the ABCs of diagnosis and surgical management

Ischemic colitis (IC) is a rare condition. As ischemia is often transient and clinical symptoms are reversible, its exact incidence is unknown. In current clinical practice, two types of IC are described according to the severity: severe IC, with transmural colonic ischemia and/or multi-organ failure (MOF), and mild IC, without MOF and spontaneous favourable evolution in most cases. Two clinical contexts are encountered: spontaneous IC (SIC) and postoperative IC (POIC), mainly after aortic surgery. As there is no specific clinico-biologic symptom of IC, emergent CT-scan and rectosigmoidoscopy are required for diagnosis confirmation, surgical decision and prognosis analysis. IC surgical treatment is not consensual but can be standardized according to organ function and the degree of ischemia: surgical treatment in case of colonic necrosis with deep ischemia and/or MOF; observation for superficial ischemia without organ dysfunction; systematic medical care. Surgery is required in 20% of cases, and consists in extended colectomy without continuity restoration and prophylactic cholecystectomy. Continuity restoration is feasible in one third of survivors, who are exposed to a high risk of severe cardiovascular events.