Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary

Effectiveness and safety of full-thickness versus circular muscle myotomy in peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective single-center analysis of 152 patients

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder, which shows impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the absence of peristalsis, leading to dysphagia, weight loss, and chest pain. In recent years, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become a popular method for treating achalasia. However, the effectiveness and safety of full-thickness myotomy (FTM) versus circular muscle myotomy (CMM) in POEM require further investigation.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center analysis studied 152 patients who underwent POEM surgery at the General Hospital of the Western Theater Command from May 2014 to May 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the depth of myotomy: the FTM group and the CMM group. Parameters such as surgical success rate, procedure time, and myotomy length were evaluated, and treatment efficacy was assessed based on the Eckardt score. Postoperative complications and efficacy were also monitored.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in both groups, with shorter procedure times in the FTM group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative Eckardt scores and symptom improvement between the FTM and CMM groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seemed to be higher in the FTM group, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.051).

CONCLUSION

For patients with achalasia, there were no significant differences in short-to-medium-term treatment efficacy and safety between FTM and CMM in POEM. Although FTM significantly reduced procedure time, it may lead to a higher incidence of GERD. More cases are needed in the future to explore the more appropriate myotomy for different achalasia subtypes.

Complications related to third space endoscopic procedures

Third space endoscopy (TSE) encompasses a breadth of procedures for the treatment of a variety of GI disorders. The widespread use of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and its diversification to include extended indications and at locations other than the oesophagus has provided an insight into the potential complications encountered. The most common adverse events associated with POEM, the epitome of TSE procedures, include insufflation related injuries, bleeding, failure of mucosal barrier, infections, pain, blown out myotomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The purpose of this review is to highlight the pitfalls and to identify the risk factors that may lead to adverse events, and to recommend appropriate salvage interventions in the scope of the current evidence.

Modified peroral endoscopic myotomy technique with retrograde on-demand myotomy for achalasia: a retrospective cohort study (with video)

BACKGROUND

Although myotomy is crucial in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) surgeries, its optimum length remains controversial. Herein, we propose a modified POEM with new method of tailoring myotomy length aim to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of this modified POEM compared with standard POEM in type I or II achalasia.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with type I or II achalasia who underwent POEM at the First Hospital of Jilin University between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the myotomy approach, these patients were divided into the retrograde on-demand myotomy (RDM, n = 34), with myotomy beginning on gastric side and length tailored by determining the degree of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distention, and standard myotomy (SM, n = 41) groups. The baseline data, myotomy length, operation time, clinical success rate, adverse event rate, and reflux-related adverse events were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

The median myotomy length in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (6 vs. 8 cm, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, the median myotomy time in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (10 vs. 16 min, respectively; p < 0.001). POEM was successfully performed in all the patients. At the 2-year follow-up, high clinical success rates were observed in both the RDM and SM groups (92.0% vs. 93.3%, respectively; p = 1.000). The incidence of intraoperative adverse events and postoperative reflux-related adverse events was low and comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RDM POEM is a safe and effective method for patients with type I or II achalasia. Furthermore, it has a shorter myotomy length and operation time than standard POEM technique.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is an Effective Treatment Option for Managing Jackhammer Esophagus: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a rare hypercontractile motility disorder often associated with dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. In patients with clinically relevant symptoms, treatment options aim to decrease esophageal contractions. Medical, endoscopic and surgical therapies have limited long-term efficacy. The advent of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has evolved as a minimally invasive treatment option. Yet data regarding JE is scare. As such we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of JE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single center retrospective study of consecutive adult patients undergoing POEM for JE from April 2018 to September 2021. All procedures were conducted by a single endoscopist. Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as Eckardt score (ES) ≤3 following the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients (mean age 58, 7 females) underwent POEM with a mean duration of symptoms of 42.6 months. Preprocedure mean ES was 8.92. Nine patients were treatment naive. Pre-POEM endoluminal functional luminal imaging probe (n=10) demonstrated a distensibility index of 0.34. The average length of follow-up after POEM was 15.8 months.There was a 92.3% (12/13) clinical success rate, with a mean post-POEM ES of 1.53. One patient's ES improved from 12 to 1 after POEM; however, 2.5 years later she developed recurrent symptoms (ES 10). Only 1 patient had endoscopic evidence of Los Angeles grade A esophagitis. One year after POEM, 5 patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, but only 2 required acid suppression therapy.

CONCLUSION

POEM is an effective treatment modality with long-term efficacy. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Repeat peroral endoscopic myotomy with simultaneous submucosal and muscle dissection as a salvage option for recurrent achalasia

BACKGROUND

For recurrent achalasia after initial peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) failure, repeat POEM (Re-POEM) has been reported as a treatment option. However, severe esophageal interlayer adhesions caused by previous procedures impede the successful establishment of a submucosal tunnel and lead to aborted Re-POEM procedures. Our team previously described POEM with simultaneous submucosal and muscle dissection (POEM-SSMD) as a feasible solution for achalasia with severe interlayer adhesions.

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of Re-POEM with simultaneous submucosal and muscle dissection (Re-POEM-SSMD).

METHODS

A total of 1049 patients with achalasia who underwent successful endoscopic myotomy at the Digestive Endoscopic Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from December 2014 to May 2022 were reviewed. Patients with recurrent achalasia who experienced initial POEM clinical failure were retrospectively included in this study. The primary endpoint was retreatment clinical success, defined as an Eckardt score ≤ 3 during the postretreatment follow-up and no need for additional treatment. Procedure-related adverse events, changes in manometric lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and reflux complications, as well as procedure-related parameters, were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent Re-POEM (9 patients) or Re-POEM-SSMD (7 patients) successfully at a median of 45.5 mo (range, 4-95 mo) after initial POEM. During a median follow-up period of 31 mo (range, 7-96 mo), clinical success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was achieved in 8 (88.9%) and 6 (85.7%) patients after Re-POEM and Re-POEM-SSMD, respectively (P = 0.849). The median Eckardt score dropped from 4 (range, 3-8) at preretreatment to 1 (range, 0-5) at postretreatment in the Re-POEM group (P = 0.025) and from 5 (range, 2-8) to 2 (range, 0-4) in the Re-POEM-SSMD group (P < 0.001). The mean manometric LES pressure decreased from 23.78 ± 9.04 mmHg to 11.45 ± 5.37 mmHg after Re-POEM (P < 0.001) and from 26.80 ± 7.48 mmHg to 11.05 ± 4.38 mmHg after Re-POEM-SSMD (P < 0.001). No serious adverse events were recorded in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Re-POEM-SSMD appears to be a safe and effective salvage therapy for recurrent achalasia with severe interlayer adhesions.

Periprocedural safety profile of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)-a retrospective analysis of adverse events according to two different classifications

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is nowadays a standard method for treatment of achalasia; nevertheless, it remains an invasive intervention with corresponding risk of adverse events (AEs). The classification and grading of AEs are still a matter of discussion. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the occurrence of all "undesirable" events and "true" adverse events in patients undergoing POEM and to compare the outcomes when either Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) or American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon classification applied.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively managed database of all patients who had undergone POEM between December 2012 and August 2018. We assessed the pre-, peri-, and early-postoperative (up to patient's discharge) undesirable events (including those not fulfilling criteria for AEs) and "true" AEs according the definition in either of the classifications.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients have successfully undergone 244 POEM procedures (13 × re-POEM). Twenty-nine procedures (11.9%) passed uneventfully, while in 215 procedures (88.1%), a total of 440 undesirable events occurred. The CDC identified 27 AEs (17 minor, 10 major) occurring in 23/244 (9.4%) procedures. The ASGE lexicon identified identical 27 AEs (21 mild or moderate, 6 severe or fatal) resulting in the severity distribution of AEs being the only difference between the two classifications. Only the absence of previous treatment was found to be a risk factor [p = 0.047, OR with 95% CI: 4.55 (1.02; 20.25)] in the combined logistic regression model.

CONCLUSION

Undesirable events are common in patients undergoing POEM but the incidence of true AEs is low according to both classifications. Severe adverse events are infrequent irrespective of the classification applied. CDC may be more appropriate than ASGE lexicon for classifying POEM-related AEs given a surgical nature of this procedure.

East versus West: Comparisons and Implications in Adaptation to Practice

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred strategy for the resection of large superficial neoplasia throughout the gastrointestinal tract in Asian countries. The transition of ESD to the West has been slower because of various regional and training differences. Nonetheless, over the past couple of decades, the steady growth of ESD mentors in the West and the introduction of viable training pathways and dedicated devices and accessories have led to the increasing adoption of ESD and other third space endoscopic procedures.

Management of Adverse Events of Submucosal Endoscopy

The risk-benefit profile of submucosal endoscopic procedures is generally favorable but there exist unique considerations regarding the recognition, treatment, and prevention of submucosal endoscopic complications. Bleeding during the procedure can be managed with knife electrocautery, tamponade by injection of additional submucosal agent, or hemostatic forceps, depending on the location and degree of bleeding. Delayed bleeding should be managed with repeat endoscopy. Potential means to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding include anticipatory coagulation of visible vessels in the dissection ulcer base, applied hemostatic chemicals, snares, clips, and sheets of cultured cells.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Technique, from Mouth to Anus

The peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) procedure, as described over 10 years ago, is a submucosal endoscopy procedure that allows access to the muscle layers throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. With this access, and ability to cut the muscle fibers, POEM can be performed not only for motility disorders but for structural pathology as well, such as Zenker diverticulum. Regardless of the location, there are 4 steps to the procedure: mucosotomy, submucosal tunneling, myotomy, and mucostomy closure. This review outlines these key components as well as variations in techniques for POEM throughout the GI tract.

A prediction model and nomogram for technical difficulty of peroral endoscopic myotomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising endoscopic technique for achalasia. We aimed to establish a regression model and develop a simple nomogram to predict the technical difficulty of POEM in a single center with large volume cases.

METHODS

3385 achalasia patients treated with POEM were included, and the technical difficulty was systemically evaluated. All of them were randomized into the training cohort (n = 1693) or internal validation cohort (n = 1692). Then, the prediction model and nomogram were proposed based on multivariate logistic regression analysis in the training cohort and assessed in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Of 3385 patients, technical difficulty happened in 417 (12.32%) cases. In the training stage, six factors were weighted based on the β coefficient from the regression model, including age, disease duration, sigmoid esophagus, mucosal edema, submucosal fibrosis, and tunnel length. The patients were categorized into low-risk (< 0.1), medium-risk (0.1-0.25), and high-risk (> = 0.25) groups. Our score model performed satisfying discrimination with the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.743 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.701-0.785) and calibration with goodness of fit in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P = 0.088) in internal validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model and nomogram demonstrated good performance in predicting the technical difficulty of POEM.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) in Children: A State of the Art Review

Esophageal achalasia is a relatively rare disease in children that has been treated with balloon dilatation, botulinum toxin injection, and Heller myotomy. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is another treatment that has been successfully employed to treat adults with achalasia for over a decade and has been increasingly used in children. This State of the Art Review from the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Endoscopy Committee reviews the current literature in pediatric POEM including the technique, success rate, complications as well as training guidelines. Though there is limited data, POEM in children has shown encouraging success rates and with further study may become the mainstay of pediatric achalasia treatment.

Peroral Endoscopy Myotomy (POEM) for Esophageal Motility Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide an overview of the current role of per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the management of primary esophageal motility disorders and treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.

RECENT FINDINGS

POEM has been shown to be an effective treatment for achalasia. Recent research has suggested that the length of myotomy may be tailored to the disease phenotype and that short myotomy may be equally effective compared to long myotomy. The role of intra-operative EndoFLIP has shown promise as a tool to assess of the adequacy of myotomy. Further research is needed to determine the role of POEM in other esophageal motility disorders and for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Per oral endoscopic myotomy has been shown to be an effective and durable treatment option for achalasia with additional potential roles for the treatment of other esophageal motility disorders and Zenker's diverticulum.

Role of functional luminal imaging probe in the management of postmyotomy clinical failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A small percentage of patients with esophageal dysmotility disorders (EDDs) fail to improve or relapse after management by laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). In this study, we aimed to describe the role of functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) in identifying patients who might benefit from lower esophageal sphincter (LES)-directed retreatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study at 6 tertiary care centers (United States, 4; Europe, 1; Asia, 1) between January 2015 and April 2021 involving patients with prior failed myotomy. The primary outcome was the impact of the use of FLIP on the management of patients with prior failed myotomy.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three patients (62 women [50%]; mean age, 53 ± 21.1 years) who underwent LHM (n = 53, 43%) or POEM (n = 70, 57%) for the management of achalasia (n = 98) or other EDDs (n = 25) had clinical failure at a median time of 10.8 months (interquartile range, .8-17.3) postprocedure. Twenty-nine patients had apposing "abnormal" diagnoses in terms of integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) >15 mm Hg on HRM and distensibility index (DI) <2.8 mm²/mm Hg on FLIP, with ultimate change in management noted in 15 patients (10 directed toward conservative management, 5 directed toward LES-directed retreatment). The impact of FLIP on both diagnosis and management was noted in 15 of 29 patients (52%). In the subgroup analysis of 44 patients who underwent LES-directed retreatment, clinical success was highest among patients with both abnormal IRP and DI (21/25 [84%]) versus patients with only abnormal IRP (8/14 [57%]) or only abnormal DI (3/5 [60%], P = .04), with DI at 40-mL distension volume on FLIP identified as an independent predictor of clinical success (odd ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.1; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of this study further suggests the important role of using FLIP in addition to HRM in evaluating patients with clinical failure postmyotomy.

Safety and Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Shorter Myotomy versus Longer Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The adequate myotomy length during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is still controversial. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the modified POEM with shorter myotomy (SM) and compare the outcomes between SM and longer myotomy (LM) in achalasia patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 28, 2021. The primary outcome was clinical success rate and incidence of reflux-relative adverse events (AEs). Fixed- or random-effect models were adopted for the analysis according to the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 225 patients in SM group and 222 patients in LM group were included. The overall clinical success of SM was 96.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.7 to 98.4%). SM showed noninferior response as compared to LM (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06, P = 0.41, I 2 = 0%). Based on the abnormal acid reflux by pH monitoring, its incidence was significantly lower in the SM group than that in the LM group (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.94, P = 0.03, I 2 = 0%). With respect to procedure-related parameters, the total procedure time of SM was significantly shorter than that of LM (mean difference (MD) -16.30, 95% CI -23.10 to -9.49, P < 0.001, I 2 = 68%).

CONCLUSIONS

SM and LM are comparable in providing treatment efficacy for achalasia patients, whereas less operation time and lower incidence of post-POEM abnormal esophageal acid exposure are observed in SM.

Peroral endoscopic longer vs shorter esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the treatment of achalasia. Longer myotomy is the standard POEM procedure for achalasia but when compared with shorter myotomy, its effectiveness is not as well known.

AIM

To compare the clinical effectiveness of longer and shorter myotomy.

METHODS

PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane Library, web of science and clinicaltrials.gov were queried for studies comparing shorter and longer POEM for achalasia treatment. The primary outcome was clinical success rate. Secondary outcomes comprised of operative time, adverse events (AEs) rate, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and procedure-related parameters. The Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model was primarily used for the analysis. Publication bias was assessed.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in this analysis with a total of 514 participants. During the follow-up period of 1-28.7 mo, longer and shorter myotomy in treating achalasia showed similar excellent effectiveness [overall clinical success (OR = 1, 95%CI: 0.46-2.17, P = 1, I²: 0%; subgroup of abstract (OR = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.38 to 3.73; P = 0.76; I²: 0%); subgroup of full text (OR = 0.86 95%CI: 0.30 to 2.49; P = 0.78; I²: 0%)]. Shorter myotomy had significantly reduced mean operative time compared with the longer procedure. There were no statistically significant differences in AEs rates, including GERD (overall OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 0.76-1.91; P = 0.42; I²: 9%; subgroup of abstract OR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.40-1.47; P = 0.43; I²: 0%; subgroup of full text OR = 1.91, 95%CI: 0.98-3.75; P = 0.06; I²: 0%), hospital stay (overall MD = -0.07, 95%CI: -0.30 to 0.16; P = 0.55; I²: 24%; subgroup of abstract MD = 0.20, 95%CI: -0.25 to 0.65; P = 0.39; I²: 0; subgroup of full text MD = -0.16, 95%CI: -0.42 to 0.10; P = 0.23; I²: 42%), and major bleeding (overall OR = 1.25, 95%CI: 0.58-2.71; P = 0.56; I²: 0%) between the two procedures. These differences remained statistically non-significant in all sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

POEM was effective in treating achalasia. Shorter and longer myotomy procedures provided similar therapeutic effects in terms of long-term effectiveness. In addition, shorter myotomy reduced the operative time.

Beyond the Eckardt Score: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Esophageal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and summarize their role in assessing undifferentiated dysphagia and common esophageal disorders, including achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the subjective nature of swallowing disorders, accurate diagnoses often rely on capturing the patient experience. As a result, the number of PROMs used to characterize esophageal symptoms is increasing with a recent particular emphasis on EoE. Overall, esophageal-focused PROMs are used to interpret patient symptoms and quality of life, diagnosis, and symptom changes over time. There are limitations with each instrument, including factors affecting validity, reliability, accessibility, patient participation, and logistical implementation. PROM instruments can be helpful tools in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disorders. Instruments should be chosen based on factors such as target population and setting, including research, clinical, and quality improvement efforts. Future research should address how best to implement PROMs and integrate the obtained data with patient care.

Single-dose versus short-course prophylactic antibiotics for peroral endoscopic myotomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been recommended for achalasia treatment. To prevent the potential of infective risk, antibiotic prophylaxis is usually administered, whereas the additional need of antibiotic therapy after POEM is uncertain. The primary endpoint was to determine whether prophylaxis versus prophylaxis plus short therapy was needed after POEM.

METHODS

Consecutive patients scheduled for POEM were randomly assigned (1:1) to group A (prophylactic cefazolin 2 g IV) or group B (prophylaxis + cefazolin 2 g IV × 3 followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 3 g/day). Infective risk was assessed by means of host response, namely body temperature and serum levels of white blood cells and C-reactive protein; immune response (the cytokines interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α and microbial translocation mediators lipopolysaccharide binding protein and soluble CD14); and blood cultures at time points before (t0) and after (t1, t2) POEM.

RESULTS

After POEM, none of the 124 enrolled patients (54.6 ± 12.6 years old; 64 men) developed any fever (body temperature: t0, 36.56± .49°C; t1, 36.53± .52°C; t2, 36.48± .41°C), without any differences between groups at any time point. Regarding systemic inflammation, no difference was reported between groups in serum levels of C-reactive protein and white blood cells. Considering microbial translocation mediated response, lipopolysaccharide binding protein (group A: t0, 1539 ± 168.6 pg/mL; t1, 1321 ± 149.1 pg/mL; t2, 2492 ± 283.2 pg/mL; group B: t0, 1318 ± 115.9 pg/mL; t1, 1492 ± 163.8 pg/mL; t2, 2600 ± 328.2 pg/mL) and soluble CD14 (group A: t0, 2.16 ± .15 μg/mL; t1, 1.89 ± .15 μg/mL; t2, 2.2 ± .15 μg/mL; group B: t0, 2.1 ± .13 μg/mL; t1, 2 ± .13 μg/mL; t2, 2.5 ± .2 μg/mL) were similar between the 2 groups; the immune response cytokines IL-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α also were similar in the 2 groups. In relation to blood cultures, at t1 the group B bacteremia rate was 3.2% (2/62) and group A was 1.6% (1/62) with no difference (P = .6). All subsequent blood cultures were negative at t2.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our study, postprophylactic short-term antimicrobial therapy after POEM is not required because of a very low residual infective risk. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03587337.).

Management of patients after failed peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Although peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is highly effective for the management of achalasia, clinical failures may occur. The optimal management of patients who fail POEM is not well known. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of different management strategies in patients who had failed POEM.

METHODS

This was an international multicenter retrospective study at 16 tertiary centers between January 2012 and November 2019. All patients who underwent POEM and experienced persistent or recurrent symptoms (Eckardt score > 3) were included. The primary outcome was to compare the rates of clinical success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) between different management strategies. RESULTS : 99 patients (50 men [50.5 %]; mean age 51.4 [standard deviation (SD) 16.2]) experienced clinical failure during the study period, with a mean (SD) Eckardt score of 5.4 (0.3). A total of 29 patients (32.2 %) were managed conservatively and 70 (71 %) underwent retreatment (repeat POEM 33 [33 %], pneumatic dilation 30 [30 %], and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) 7 [7.1 %]). During a median follow-up of 10 (interquartile range 3 - 20) months, clinical success was highest in patients who underwent repeat POEM (25 /33 [76 %]; mean [SD] Eckardt score 2.1 [2.1]), followed by pneumatic dilation (18/30 [60 %]; Eckardt score 2.8 [2.3]), and LHM (2/7 [29 %]; Eckardt score 4 [1.8]; P = 0.12). A total of 11 patients in the conservative group (37.9 %; mean Eckardt score 4 [1.8]) achieved clinical success. CONCLUSION : This study comprehensively assessed an international cohort of patients who underwent management of failed POEM. Repeat POEM and pneumatic dilation achieved acceptable clinical success, with excellent safety profiles.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is equally safe and highly effective treatment option in achalasia patients with both lower and higher ASA classification status

INTRODUCTION

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system was developed as a simple categorization of patients' physiological status that predicts the operative risk. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive alternative to surgical myotomy in achalasia. As such, POEM seems to be an appealing option for high-risk patients with achalasia. However, there are no studies which systematically analyzed the outcomes of POEM among patients with different ASA classes. Hence, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in patients with lower and higher ASA classes.

METHODS

Medical records of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and May 2019 were reviewed. Patients were categorized arbitrarily into two groups, lower ASA class (ASA I and II combined) and higher ASA class (ASA class III and IV combined). Demographic and procedural details, timed barium swallow (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), pH study findings and Eckardt scores were compared between the two groups. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square test and two-sample t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients met our study criteria (lower ASA class, n = 44; and higher ASA class, n = 100). Patients in higher ASA class were significantly more obese and older. More patients in lower ASA class had prior Heller myotomy and more patients in higher ASA Class had prior botulinum toxin injections. Procedural parameters were similar in both groups. Procedural complications were infrequent and were also similar in the two groups. The length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, reflux symptoms and esophageal pH study findings were also comparable between the two groups. Treatment success was similar in both groups, 97.7% in lower ASA class versus 92% in higher ASA class (p = 0.19). At 2-month follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in HREM and TBE parameters.

CONCLUSION

POEM is a very safe and highly effective treatment option for achalasia patients with advanced ASA class similar to lower ASA class patients. POEM may be considered as the preferred choice for myotomy in these high-risk achalasia patients due to its low morbidity and high efficacy.

Outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in challenging achalasia patients: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been shown to be effective for achalasia patients. Our study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of POEM for challenging patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 278 challenging achalasia patients who underwent POEM from January 2011 to July 2019. The outcomes of POEM such as procedure time, adverse events, and risk factors of adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 278 patients (134 males and 144 females) with a mean age of 47.0 years, 103, 223, 93, and 98 patients had prior treatment and were Ling classification IIc/III, submucosal fibrosis (SMF) classification 2/3, and esophageal mucosa in achalasia (EMIA) classification c/d/e/f, respectively. The mean procedure time was 45.9 min (range, 15-158 min). The mean length of the tunnel and myotomy were 10.1 cm (range, 7-17 cm) and 6.6 cm (range, 5-13 cm), respectively. The major adverse event rate was 14.1%, while the minor adverse event rate was 4.7%. SMF classification 2/3 was an independent risk factor for incomplete tunneling, adverse events, and procedure time ≥ 90 min. The mean follow-up time was 37.2 months (range 1-99 months). The mean Eckardt score and esophageal sphincter pressure were both significantly declined postoperatively. The clinical success rate was 95.6%.

CONCLUSION

POEM is safe and effective for challenging achalasia patients. SMF classification grade 2/3 was shown to be an independent risk factor for incomplete tunneling, adverse events, and procedure time ≥ 90 min. For these patients, POEM should be performed by experienced endoscopists, some cases are better served with traditional surgery, such as minimally invasive Heller with Dor fundoplication.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs pneumatic dilation (PD) in treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis of studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up

Background and study aims  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is increasingly being used as the preferred treatment option for achalasia. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of POEM versus pneumatic balloon dilation (PD). Methods  We performed a comprehensive review of studies that reported clinical outcomes of POEM and PD for the treatment of achalasia. Measured outcomes included clinical success (improvement of symptoms based on a validated scale including an Eckardt score ≤ 3), adverse events, and post-treatment gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Results  Sixty-six studies (6268 patients) were included in the final analysis, of which 29 studies (2919 patients) reported on POEM and 33 studies (3050 patients) reported on PD and 4 studies (299 patients) compared POEM versus PD. Clinical success with POEM was superior to PD at 12, 24, and 36 months (92.9 %, vs 76.9 % P  = 0.001; 90.6 % vs 74.8 %, P  = 0.004; 88.4 % vs 72.2 %, P  = 0.006, respectively). POEM was superior to PD in type I, II and III achalasia (92.7 % vs 61 %, P  = 0.01; 92.3 % vs 80.3 %, P  = 0.01; 92.3 %v 41.9 %, P  = 0.01 respectively) Pooled OR of clinical success at 12 and 24 months were significantly higher with POEM (8.97; P  = 0.001 & 5.64; P  = 0.006). Pooled OR of GERD was significantly higher with POEM (by symptoms: 2.95, P  = 0.02 and by endoscopic findings: 6.98, P  = 0.001). Rates of esophageal perforation (0.3 % vs 0.6 %, P  = 0.8) and significant bleeding (0.4 % vs 0.7 %, P  = 0.56) were comparable between POEM and PD groups. Conclusions  POEM is more efficacious than PD in the treatment of patients with achalasia during short-term and long-term follow-up, albeit with higher risk of abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

Prospective evaluation of the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an endoscopic alternative to surgical myotomy in patients with achalasia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of POEM.A total of 20 patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between October 2016 and November 2017 were prospectively recruited. The intraoperative esophagogastric junction distensibility index (mm2/mm Hg) was measured pre- and post-myotomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe. Clinical response was defined as Eckardt score ≤3. Health-related quality of life was measured by the 36-item short-form health survey score.POEM was successfully completed in all cases. The median procedure time was 68.5 minutes (range 50.0-120.0), and the median myotomy length was 13 cm (range 11-18). Major adverse events were encountered in 2 cases. Overall, clinical responses were observed in all patients during a median follow-up of 11.9 months (range 1.2-26.2). Postoperative esophagogastric junction distensibility index was significantly higher than baseline (from 1.3 [range 0.8-6.9] to 6.3 [range 25-19.2], P < .001). The median Eckardt scores were decreased after POEM (5 [range 2-11] to 1 [range 0-3], P < .001), and the 36-item short-form health survey score was also improved significantly after POEM (67.5 [range 34.5-93.9] to 85.7 [range 53.4-93.3], P = .004).POEM is an effective treatment for achalasia, based on the improvement of both symptoms and objective measures.Clinicaltrial.gov NCT02989883.

Outcomes of 100 Patients More Than 4 Years After POEM for Achalasia

OBJECTIVE

We aim to describe the long-term follow-up data from our institution's POEM experience.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a well-established endoscopic therapy for achalasia with excellent short-term efficacy, but long-term outcomes data are limited.

METHODS

Patients older than 4 years removed from POEM for treatment of achalasia were studied. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt Symptom (ES) score ≤3 and freedom from reintervention for achalasia. Patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), high-resolution manometry, impedance planimetry, and timed barium esophagram (TBE) preoperatively and at least 4 years postoperatively. Objective gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was defined LA Grade B or worse esophagitis on EGD.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen consecutive patients were included. Five patients died or had catastrophic events unrelated to achalasia or POEM. One hundred of the remaining patients (88%, 100/114) had long-term data available. Clinical follow-up for all patients was greater than 4 years postoperatively and the mean was 55 months. Mean current ES was significantly improved from preop (n = 100, 1 ± 1 vs 7 ± 2, P < 0.001). Overall clinical success was 88% and 92%. Five patients had a current ES >3 and 4 patients required procedural reintervention on the lower esophageal sphincter. Reinterventions were successful in 75% of patients (3/4), with current ES ≤3. The rate of objective GERD was 33% (15/45). Esophageal physiology was improved with a decrease in median integrated relaxation pressure (11 ± 4 vs 33 ± 15 mm Hg, P < 0.001), a decrease in median TBE column height (3 ± 3 vs 13 ± 8 cm, P < 0.001), and an increase in median distensibility index (5.1 ± 2 vs 1.1 ± 1 mm2/mm Hg, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

POEM provides durable symptom relief and improvement in physiologic esophagogastric junction relaxation parameters over 4.5 years postoperatively. Reinterventions are rare and effective.

Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia Patients with Failed Previous Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a rescue treatment for recurrent or persistent achalasia after failed initial management. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of POEM in achalasia patients with failed previous intervention. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases using the queries "achalasia," "peroral endoscopic myotomy," and related terms in March 2019. Data on technical and clinical success, adverse events, Eckardt score and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure were collected. The pooled event rates, mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated. A total of 15 studies with 2,276 achalasia patients were included. Overall, the pooled technical success, clinical success and adverse events rate of rescue POEM were 98.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.6% to 98.8%), 90.8% (95% CI, 88.8% to 92.4%) and 10.3% (95% CI, 6.6% to 15.8%), respectively. Seven studies compared the clinical outcomes of POEM between previous failed treatment and the treatment naïve patients. The RR for technical success, clinical success, and adverse events were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.01), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.04), and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.76), respectively. Overall, there was significant reduction in the pre- and post-Eckardt score (MD, 5.77; p<0.001) and LES pressure (MD, 18.3 mm Hg; p<0.001) for achalasia patients with failed previous intervention after POEM. POEM appears to be a safe, effective and feasible treatment for individuals who have undergone previous failed intervention. It has similar outcomes in previously treated and treatment-naïve achalasia patients.

Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of recurrent achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Heller myotomy (HM) is an established treatment for achalasia but can fail in up to 10-20% of patients. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be an appropriate treatment for patients with failed HM.

Methods

We searched several databases to identify non-comparative studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of POEM after failed HM and comparative studies comparing the efficacy and/or safety of POEM in patients with and without prior HM. Outcomes assessed included clinical success, technical success, adverse events, post-treatment gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and presence of esophagitis on endoscopy. We calculated weighted pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes in patients undergoing POEM with prior HM. We calculated pooled odds ratios with 95%CI to compare the outcomes between patients with and without previous HM who underwent POEM.

Results

We included 11 observational studies with 1205 patients. Weighted pooled rates (95%CI) for overall clinical success and technical success in patients with failed HM were 87% (81-91%) and 97% (94-99%), respectively. Weighted pooled rates (95%CI) for major adverse events, new-onset GERD and presence of esophagitis on endoscopy were 5% (2-10%), 33% (26-41%), and 38% (22-58%), respectively. There were no differences in clinical success, adverse events, post-treatment GERD and esophagitis between patients with and without previous HM.

Conclusions

POEM is safe and effective in patients with failed HM and should be considered in patients with recurrent achalasia after HM. Outcomes of POEM are comparable in patients with and without prior HM.

The Modern Age of POEM: the Past, Present and Future of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy

BACKGROUND

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has gained widespread enthusiasm amongst foregut specialists since its introduction in the mid 2000s as an effective and less invasive treatment option for achalasia. As more than 6000 POEM procedures have been performed to date throughout the world, we aim to summarize the history and current state of POEM in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of the published literature focusing on the history and development of the POEM procedure, and its most current applications and outcomes.

RESULTS

Multiple favorable long-term studies have been published advocating for the use of POEM as a valid and perhaps the most valid treatment option for achalasia. The procedure is also increasingly being applied to a wider spectrum of esophageal motility disorders including type III achalasia, spastic esophageal disease or isolated lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction, as well as new endoluminal procedures such as submucosal tumor endoscopic resection (STER), endoscopic fundoplications (POEM-F) and peroral pyloromyotomy (POP or G-POEM).

CONCLUSIONS

While POEM is a proved and valid procedure, its further adoption is being threatened by external factors: challenges related to teaching, institutional support (politics) and insurance reimbursement. While this technique has come an incredible distance in its relatively short lifespan, the future of POEM in the USA will depend on the support from surgical societies to validate it as a valuable tool in the esophageal specialist's armamentarium, and to encourage a commitment to training in endoluminal surgery.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia with previous Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Heller myotomy (HM) is considered the standard surgical treatment for patients with achalasia. However, approximately 10% to 20% of patients with achalasia have persistent or recurrent symptoms after HM that require further therapy. Several studies have reported the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in these patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with achalasia with previous HM.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to January 31, 2020. Studies evaluating the outcomes of POEM in patients with achalasia with previous HM were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were the pooled rates of clinical success (defined as post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3), mean change in Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). The secondary outcomes were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and incidence of postoperative GERD.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies involving 272 patients with achalasia were recruited in this review. POEM was successfully performed in 270 (99.3%) patients after previous HM. Clinical success was achieved in 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.1%-96.8%) of patients. Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and IRP were significantly lowered by 5.14 (95% CI, 4.19-6.09), 12.01 mm Hg (95% CI, 6.74-17.27), and 10.02 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.95-15.09), respectively. The pooled rates of postoperative symptomatic reflux, esophagitis, and abnormal pH monitoring were 36.9% (95% CI, 20.7%-53.1%), 33.0% (95% CI, 9.6%-56.4%), and 47.8% (95% CI, 33.4%-62.2%), respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was detected across all outcome measurements. Most of the AEs were self-limiting or managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM is a safe and effective treatment for patients with achalasia with previous HM. Further data from prospective, controlled studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy as a Novel Treatment for Achalasia: Patient Selection and Perspectives

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and impaired relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter. There is no cure for achalasia and all the current treatments are aimed at palliation of symptoms by reducing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Currently, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication is considered the most effective and durable treatment option owing to its superiority over other treatments such as pneumatic dilation. Advancements in interventional endoscopy led to a novel minimally invasive endoscopic alternative to LHM, namely peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). In the last decade since its inception, POEM expanded rapidly throughout the world due to excellent safety profile and its efficacy comparable to LHM. The main drawback of POEM is gastroesophageal reflux disease since it is not combined with an anti-reflux procedure. The current review focuses on the indications, contraindications, technique, outcomes of POEM in various patient populations, and complications along with its effectiveness in comparison to LHM and pneumatic dilation.

The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging

The landscape of advanced endoscopy continues to evolve as new technologies and techniques become available. Although postgraduate advanced endoscopy fellowships have traditionally centered on ERCP and diagnostic EUS, the breadth of training has increased over the years in response to the ever-growing demand for therapeutic endoscopy. The increasing diversity and complexity of emerging endoscopic techniques accompanied by the shift in focus toward competency-based medical education requires innovative changes to the curriculum that will ensure adequate training yet without compromising best patient practices. The purpose of this review is to highlight the expansive array of advanced endoscopic procedures and the challenges of both defining and measuring competence during training. All authors are interventional endoscopists at their respective institutions performing these complex procedures, as well as training fellows in these techniques. We share our perspectives based on our experience navigating through these issues at our institutions and discuss strategies to standardize training and how to potentially incorporate these measures in the process of credentialing and privileging in endoscopy.

[Anesthesia in gastrointestinal endoscopy: peroral endoscopic myotomy]

Idiopathic achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus characterized by a dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter, which typically manifests as dysphagia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an interventional endoscopic procedure for achalasia, which was introduced in 2010. Although results from randomized studies comparing short-term and long-term safety and efficacy are yet to be published, POEM is regarded to be less invasive than the standard treatment of achalasia (laparoscopic Heller myotomy). POEM is the first endoscopic procedure routinely performed with the patient under general anesthesia. During the preoperative assessment particular attention must be paid to the specific fasting intervals and the risk of aspiration during induction of anesthesia. For the purpose of temporary surgical access, the integrity of the esophageal wall is deliberately interrupted to create a long submucosal tunnel. As a result, unwanted fistulas can arise between the esophageal lumen, the mediastinum, the pleura or the intraperitoneal cavity. Endoscopically insufflated CO₂ may escape into these surrounding compartments with subsequent systemic CO₂ accumulation, capnomediastinum, tension capnoperitoneum or pneumothorax. As a result substantial cardiorespiratory instability can arise. Thus, the attending anesthesiologist must be familiar with these typical complications and with specific emergency measures, such as compensatory hyperventilation, percutaneous needle decompression and thoracic drainage. The POEM procedure is a therapeutic innovation and interdisciplinary challenge. However, anesthesia standards of care have not yet been specified. The aim of this review is therefore to outline some clinical recommendations for the daily clinical practice based on existing evidence.

Peroral endoscopic shorter versus longer myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a comparative retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) is a novel endoscopic treatment for achalasia. It has gained popularity worldwide among surgeons and endoscopists, but no studies have compared peroral endoscopic short with long myotomy for achalasia. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between peroral endoscopic shorter and longer myotomy.

METHODS

The retrospective study enrolled 129 achalasia patients who underwent POEM from July 2011 to September 2017. Based on the myotomy length (ML), patients were divided into shorter myotomy (SM) group (ML ≤ 7 cm, n = 36) and longer myotomy (LM) group (ML > 7 cm, n = 74). Procedure-related parameters, symptom scores, adverse events and manometric data were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The mean ML was 6.0 ± 0.6 cm in SM group, and 11.5 ± 3.1 cm in LM group (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly less in SM group than LM group (46.6 ± 18.5 min vs 62.1 ± 25.2 min, p = 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 28.7 months, treatment success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was achieved in 94.4% (34/36) of patients in SM group and 91.9% (68/74) in LM group (p = 0.926). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of intraoperative complications (8.4% vs 8.2%, p = 0.823) and reflux rate (8.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.510) between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Peroral endoscopic shorter myotomy is comparable with longer myotomy for treating achalasia with regard to clinical efficacy and has the advantage of shorter procedure time.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for geriatric patients with achalasia

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an appealing treatment for older patients, as it is minimally invasive but highly efficacious similar to surgical myotomy. However, there is a lack of systematic studies analyzing POEM outcomes in young (< 65 years) versus geriatric patients (≥ 65 years). Hence, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in young versus geriatric patients.

METHODS

Records of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and May 2019 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups: young (< 65 years) and old (≥ 65 years). Demographic and procedural details, timed barium esophagram (TBE), high-resolution manometry (HREM), pH study findings and Eckardt scores were compared between the two groups. Post-POEM Eckhardt score of ≤ 3 was defined as treatment success.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients met the study criteria (young = 93; old = 55). Younger patients were more likely to have lower TBE height at 1 min but wider TBE width at 5 min. The rest of the pre-operative parameters and Eckardt scores were similar in the two groups. Young patients were more likely to have undergone prior Heller myotomy, while Botox injections were common in the older group. The operative details and outcomes were similar in the two groups. Treatment success rates were similar in both groups (94.9% young vs. 94.7% in old patients, p = 1.00). At 2-month follow-up, both groups showed significant improvements in Eckhardt scores and HREM parameters; however, older patients showed greater improvement in TBE height at 1 and 5 min. The rates of symptomatic GERD and abnormal esophageal pH study findings were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

POEM was safe and highly effective treatment for geriatric patients with achalasia. These findings suggest that POEM might emerge as the preferred approach for myotomy in this patient population.

Sigmoid megaesophagus with thoracic pseudotumor appearance

A 61-year-old man presented with dysphagia, weight loss and shortness of breath. On examination, he had reduced lung sounds on the right, and obvious neck vein distention. Chest X-ray raised a suspicion of lung tumor with possible superior vena cava syndrome. Subsequent CT scan of chest confirmed the presence of markedly dilated and tortuous esophagus (sigmoid megaesophagus) extending to the right hemithorax and pressing on the trachea. The patient was referred for surgery.

Reproductive Outcomes Among Women of Childbearing Age with Achalasia After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience

Background: Achalasia may occasionally occur among women of childbearing age. Pregnancy may lead to deterioration of the disease and negatively affect maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, the impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on reproductive outcomes has been understudied. Methods: A retrospective study on prospectively maintained database, including women aged 18-45 who underwent POEM during 2012-2017 at a university hospital. Results: During the study period, POEM was performed in 86 patients. Of them, 23 were women of childbearing age (median age 31.9 [26.0-40.7] years). Follow-up data were available for a median of 24 [16-41] months. Treatment success (Eckardt score <3) was achieved in 22 (95.7%) women. Six (26.1%) women reported attempting to conceive after POEM. Overall, 7 post-POEM pregnancies among 5 women were encountered. All 7 pregnancies were naturally conceived with a median surgery-to-conception interval of 16 [10-21] months. The median gestational weight gain was 10 kg, and was insufficient in all pregnancies. None of the women was hospitalized during the index gestation. All pregnancies resulted in term live-birth vaginal delivery. The median neonatal birthweight was 2940 g, with only one case of a small-for-gestational age infant. Achalasia-related symptoms recurred during 2 pregnancies, with resolution following delivery. Conclusions: Pregnancy after POEM for the treatment of achalasia was associated with favorable maternal and perinatal outcomes. This data should reassure women who wish to conceive following peroral myotomy.

Cardiovascular dynamics during peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a prospective observational study using non-invasive finger cuff-derived pulse wave analysis

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery to treat esophageal achalasia. During POEM, cardiovascular dynamics can be impaired by capnoperitoneum, capnomediastinum, and systemic carbon dioxide accumulation. We systematically investigated changes in cardiovascular dynamics during POEM. We included 31 patients having POEM in this single-center prospective observational study. Before and every 5 min during POEM we measured mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) using non-invasive finger cuff-derived pulse wave analysis. During POEM, the median MAP was higher than the median baseline MAP of 77 (67;86) mmHg. HR (median at baseline: 67 (60;72) bpm), CI (2.8 (2.5;3.2) L/min/m²), SVI (42 (34;51) mL/m²), and SVRI (1994 (1652; 2559) dyn × s × cm^-5 × m^-2) remained stable during POEM. Mixed model-derived 95% confidence limits of hemodynamic variables during POEM were 72 to 106 mmHg for MAP, 65 to 79 bpm for HR, 2.7 to 3.3 L/min/m² for CI, 37 and 46 mL/m² for SVI, and 1856 and 2954 dyn × s × cm^-5 × m^-2 for SVRI. POEM is a safe procedure with regard to cardiovascular dynamics as it does not markedly impair MAP, HR, CI, SVI, or SVRI.

Clinical usefulness of esophagogastric junction distensibility measurement in patients with achalasia before and after peroral endoscopic myotomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of measuring the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility index (DI) in patients with achalasia before and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 195 patients who underwent POEM from November 2014 to November 2017 at our clinic. The Eckardt score, high-resolution manometry, and EGJ distensibility were measured before and six months after POEM. Treatment failure was defined as a postprocedure Eckardt score >3 or patients who underwent repeat POEM.

RESULTS

The DI (mm2/mmHg) before and after POEM was 3.42±3.55 and 11.57±6.64, respectively (p<0.01). There was no difference in the DI between achalasia subtypes I, II, and III (11.45±6.24 versus 15.49±11.53 versus 13.27±9.49, p=0.22) or previous treatment history (15.39±10.85 versus 11.10±7.25, p=0.20). The DI was higher in patients with reflux esophagitis after POEM, but the difference was not significant (13.59±7.15 versus 12.54±10.9, p=0.571).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that EGJ distensibility measurement is useful to assess post-POEM outcomes. These findings suggest that the functional lumen imaging probe may be a useful method for assessing clinical efficacy of POEM in patients with achalasia. However, this is a costly procedure that requires experience.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders

BACKGROUND

Esophageal motility disorders which include achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJ outflow obstruction), jackhammer esophagus (JE), distal esophageal spasm (DES), etc. are rare disease of unknown causes. The diagnosis is based on endoscopy, barium meal, and high-resolution manometry (HRM). With the development of endoscopy, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a standard method for the treatment of achalasia.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to enable gastroenterologists to have a more comprehensive understanding of the application status, technical characteristics, clinical efficacy and future prospect of POEM in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders.

METHODS

Through a large number of reading literature, combined with clinical practice, summary and analysis of the indications, procedure, efficacy, complications, and controversies of POEM in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders, as well as the current and future perspectives of POEM were studied.

RESULTS

POEM is safe and effective in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders, but the GERD reflux rate is higher.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM can be a new option for the treatment of esophageal movement disorders, but large sample, multi-center, long-term study reports are needed, and it promotes the development of NOTES technology.

Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy

AIM

To systematically review clinical presentation, diagnosis, and therapy of achalasia, focusing on recent developments in high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) for diagnosis and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for therapy.

METHODS

Systematic review of achalasia using computerized literature search via PubMed and Ovid of articles published since 2005 with keywords ("achalasia") AND ("high resolution" or "HREM" or "peroral endoscopic myotomy" or "POEM"). Two authors independently performed literature searches and incorporated articles into this review by consensus according to prospectively determined criteria.

RESULTS

Achalasia is an uncommon esophageal motility disorder, usually manifested by dysphagia to solids and liquids, and sometimes manifested by chest pain, regurgitation, and weight loss. Symptoms often suggest more common disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), thus often delaying diagnosis. Achalasia is a predominantly idiopathic chronic disease. Diagnosis is typically suggested by barium swallow showing esophageal dilation; absent distal esophageal peristalsis; smoothly tapered narrowing ("bird's beak") at esophagogastric junction; and delayed passage of contrast into stomach. Diagnostic findings at high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) include: distal esophageal aperistalsis and integrated relaxation pressure (trough LES pressure during 4 s) > 15 mmHg. Achalasia is classified by HREM into: type 1 classic; type 2 compartmentalized high pressure in esophageal body, and type 3 spastic. This classification impacts therapeutic decisions. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is required before therapy to assess esophagus and esophagogastric junction and to exclude distal esophageal malignancy. POEM is a revolutionizing achalasia therapy. POEM creates a myotomy via interventional endoscopy. Numerous studies demonstrate that POEM produces comparable, if not superior, results compared to standard laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), as determined by LES pressure, dysphagia frequency, Eckardt score, hospital length of stay, therapy durability, and incidence of GERD. Other therapies, including botulinum toxin injection and pneumatic dilation, have moderately less efficacy and much less durability than POEM.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive review suggests that POEM is equivalent or perhaps superior to LHM for achalasia in terms of cost efficiency, hospital length of stay, and relief of dysphagia, with comparable side effects. The data are, however, not conclusive due to sparse long-term follow-up and lack of randomized comparative clinical trials. POEM therapy is currently limited by a shortage of trained endoscopists.

Endoscopic techniques for myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter and pylorus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) are minimally invasive endoscopic procedures for the treatment of esophageal motility disorders and refractory gastroparesis, respectively. In this review, we highlight the most recent publications on the technical aspects of POEM and G-POEM.

RECENT FINDINGS

POEM has evolved into a standard therapeutic option in patients with all achalasia subtypes with excellent durability and safety profile. G-POEM is a novel endoscopic procedure with promising results in terms of efficacy, safety, and symptom improvement in patients with refractory gastroparesis.

SUMMARY

POEM and G-POEM are novel endoscopic procedures. Practice patterns vary among endoscopists and procedure techniques continue to evolve. Comparative studies examining outcomes of different techniques are needed.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia

Achalasia is an uncommon disorder that results from the degeneration of ganglion cells of the myenteric plexus in the lower esophageal wall. It is manifested by a loss of peristalsis in the lower part of the esophagus and failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive intervention that aims to treat achalasia. It is regarded as the endoscopic equivalent of Heller myotomy. POEM is a form of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery that is completed by creating a submucosal tunnel in the lower part of esophagus to reach the inner circular muscle bundles of the LES to perform myotomy, while preserving the outer longitudinal muscle bundles. The result is decreased resting pressure of the LES, facilitating the passage of ingested material. POEM was initially introduced to treat achalasia by targeting the LES. POEM has expanded to include gastric POEM (G-POEM), myotomy of the pyloric sphincter to treat gastroparesis, and per rectal endoscopic myotomy to treat adult Hirschsprung's disease.

Management of achalasia in 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss the efficacy, morbidity and side-effects of innovative management strategies for achalasia that include high-resolution manometry (HRM), pneumatic dilatation, laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM), injection of botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

RECENT FINDINGS

HRM has enabled identification of achalasia subtypes that have important prognostic implications. Pneumatic dilatation is a commonly-used and cost-effective method of treating achalasia but has shown poor longevity of symptom relief compared with other modalities and carries a risk of esophageal perforation. LHM is often the preferred, most effective treatment modality, however new studies may show that outcomes are equivalent or even inferior to POEM. Botulinum toxin injection of the lower esophageal sphincter has a waning and short duration of efficacy and is used primarily for patients unsuitable for more definitive invasive procedures. POEM is considered the most effective treatment for type III achalasia but carries a high risk of iatrogenic gastroesophageal reflux disease that might predispose to the development of Barrett's esophagus.

SUMMARY

HRM and POEM are two major innovations in the management of achalasia developed over the past decade. There are now three major management options for patients with achalasia, namely pneumatic dilatation, LHM and POEM. Treatment selection should be tailored to the patient's individual esophageal physiology, physical fitness and dominant symptoms.