Association of covered metallic stents with cholecystitis and stent migration in malignant biliary stricture

Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Microbiologic diagnosis of implant-associated infections

SUMMARYImplant-associated infections (IAIs) pose serious threats to patients and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These infections may be difficult to diagnose due, in part, to biofilm formation on device surfaces, and because even when microbes are found, their clinical significance may be unclear. Despite recent advances in laboratory testing, IAIs remain a diagnostic challenge. From a therapeutic standpoint, many IAIs currently require device removal and prolonged courses of antimicrobial therapy to effect a cure. Therefore, making an accurate diagnosis, defining both the presence of infection and the involved microorganisms, is paramount. The sensitivity of standard microbial culture for IAI diagnosis varies depending on the type of IAI, the specimen analyzed, and the culture technique(s) used. Although IAI-specific culture-based diagnostics have been described, the challenge of culture-negative IAIs remains. Given this, molecular assays, including both nucleic acid amplification tests and next-generation sequencing-based assays, have been used. In this review, an overview of these challenging infections is presented, as well as an approach to their diagnosis from a microbiologic perspective.

Risk factors for early and late cholecystitis after covered metal stent placement for distal biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Cholecystitis is a major adverse event after self-expandable metallic stent placement for distal biliary obstruction (DBO). Covered self-expandable metallic stent (CSEMS) is being increasingly used, but few studies have investigated risk factors for cholecystitis limited to CSEMS. The present study aimed to identify risk factors for cholecystitis after CSEMS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent initial CSEMS placement for DBO between November 2014 and September 2021 were enrolled and followed-up until death, recurrent biliary obstruction, cholecystitis, or until March 2022. Cholecystitis within 30 days of CSEMS was defined as early cholecystitis and after 30 days as late cholecystitis.

RESULTS

Cholecystitis occurred in 51 of 339 patients (15%) after CSEMS. Forty-one patients (80.4%) had early cholecystitis, and 10 (19.6%) had late cholecystitis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the maximum diameter of the common bile duct (CBD) (per 1 mm increase) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.00; p = .044), gallbladder stones (OR: 3.63; 95% CI: 1.62-8.10; p = .002), and tumor involvement in the cystic duct (CD) (OR: 4.87; 95% CI: 2.16-11.00; p < .001) were significant independent risk factors associated with early cholecystitis. No significant risk factors were identified for late cholecystitis.

CONCLUSIONS

A smaller CBD diameter, gallbladder stones, and tumor involvement in the CD were identified as risk factors for early cholecystitis development after CSEMS.

Utility of Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stents for Biliary Drainage during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the utility of covered self-expanding metal stents (CSEMSs) with that of plastic stents (PSs) for biliary drainage during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Forty patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer underwent biliary stenting during neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Hiroshima University Hospital. PSs and CSEMSs were placed in 19 and 21 patients, respectively. Two gemcitabine-based regimens for chemotherapy were used. Treatment outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of recurrent biliary obstruction was significantly lower in the CSEMS group (0% vs. 47.4%, p < 0.001), and the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction in the PS group was 47 days. There was no difference in the incidence of other complications such as non-occlusive cholangitis, pancreatitis, and cholecystitis between the two groups. Delays in the chemotherapy schedule due to stent-related complications were significantly frequent in the PS group (52.6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CSEMSs may be the best choice for safely performing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for several months in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with bile duct stricture.

Evaluation of the mechanical properties of current biliary self-expandable metallic stents: axial and radial force, and axial force zero border

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Mechanical properties (MPs) and axial and radial force (AF and RF) may influence the efficacy and complications of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement. We measured the MPs of various SEMSs and examined their influence on the SEMS clinical ability.

METHODS

We evaluated the MPs of 29 types of 10-mm SEMSs. RF was measured using a conventional measurement device. AF was measured using the conventional and new methods, and the correlation between the methods was evaluated.

RESULTS

A high correlation in AFs was observed, as measured by the new and conventional manual methods. AF and RF scatterplots divided the SEMSs into three subgroups according to structure: hook-and-cross-type (low AF and RF), cross-type (high AF and low RF), and laser-cut-type (intermediate AF and high RF). The hook-and-cross-type had the largest axial force zero border (>20°), followed by the laser-cut and cross types.

CONCLUSION

MPs were related to stent structure. Hook-and-cross-type SEMSs had a low AF and high axial force zero border and were considered safest because they caused minimal stress on the biliary wall. However, the increase in RF must be overcome.

Efficacy and complications of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction treatment by metallic stents: fully covered or uncovered?

Obstructive jaundice caused by malignant distal biliary obstruction is a common clinical symptom in patients with inoperable biliary-pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided stent implantation is an effective treatment for obstructive jaundice. Internal stent drainage is more physiologic and associated with a better quality of life than external stent drainage methods such as percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage. Self-expanding metallic stents, which may be covered and uncovered, are commonly used. However, some uncertainties remain regarding the selection of metallic stents, including drainage patency time, clinical effect, stent migration, and post-operative complications such as pancreatitis, bleeding, and cholecystitis. This review aims to summarize the current progress and controversies surrounding the use of covered or uncovered metallic stents in inoperable common biliary obstruction via ERCP.

Best Practices in Pancreatico-biliary Stenting and EUS-guided Drainage

Indications for endoscopic placement of endoluminal and transluminal stents have greatly expanded over time. Endoscopic stent placement is now a well-established approach for the treatment of benign and malignant biliary and pancreatic diseases (ie, obstructive jaundice, intra-abdominal fluid collections, chronic pancreatitis etc.). Ongoing refinement of technical approaches and development of novel stents is increasing the applicability and success of pancreatico-biliary stenting. In this review, we discuss the important developments in the field of pancreatico-biliary stenting, with a specific focus on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-associated developments.

Prophylactic endoscopic gallbladder stent placement for cholecystitis after covered metal stent placement for distal biliary obstruction (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute cholecystitis is occasionally observed after biliary drainage using a covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) for distal biliary obstruction (DBO). Gallbladder drainage before CSEMS placement may reduce cholecystitis. This study aimed to examine the preventive effect of endoscopic gallbladder stent placement (EGBS) on cholecystitis with CSEMSs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with DBO who underwent CSEMS placement across the orifice of the cystic duct between November 2014 and October 2021 and were negative for cholecystitis on biliary drainage. Prophylactic EGBS was attempted before CSEMS placement. The incidence of cholecystitis was compared between patients with and without EGBS.

RESULTS

In total, 286 patients (128 men; median age, 75 years) were included in this study. EGBS was attempted in 32 patients before CSEMS placement, and technical success was achieved in 24 patients (75%). Adverse events were noted in 3 patients (9.4%; penetration of cystic duct in 1 and acute pancreatitis in 2). The cumulative incidence of cholecystitis was significantly lower in patients with EGBS than in those without EGBS (1 [4.2%] vs 56 [21.4%], P = .045). In multivariable analysis, EGBS was a significant protective factor against cholecystitis (hazard ratio, .11; 95% confidence interval, .01-.79; P = .028).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the transpapillary approach to the gallbladder is not easy for patients with DBO, EGBS is effective in preventing cholecystitis associated with CSEMS placement.

Efficacy of Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Distal Biliary Obstruction Caused by Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Primary Metal Stent vs. Metal Stent following Plastic Stent

Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) are inserted in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to resolve malignant distal bile duct obstructions. Some patients receive FCSEMSs during primary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and others receive FCSEMSs during a later session, after the placement of a plastic stent. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FCSEMSs for primary use or following plastic stent placement. A total of 159 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (m:f, 102:57) who had achieved clinical success underwent ERCP with the placement of FCSEMSs for palliation of obstructive jaundice. One-hundred and three patients had received FCSEMSs in a first ERCP, and 56 had received FCSEMSs after prior plastic stenting. Twenty-two patients in the primary metal stent group and 18 in the prior plastic stent group had recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO). The RBO rates and self-expandable metal stent patency duration did not differ between the two groups. An FCSEMS longer than 6 cm was identified as a risk factor for RBO in patients with PDAC. Thus, choosing an appropriate FCSEMS length is an important factor in preventing FCSEMS dysfunction in patients with PDAC with malignant distal bile-duct obstruction.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures

A biliary stricture is an abnormal narrowing in the ductal drainage system of the liver that can result in clinically and physiologically relevant obstruction to the flow of bile. The most common and ominous etiology is malignancy, underscoring the importance of a high index of suspicion in the evaluation of this condition. The goals of care in patients with a biliary stricture are confirming or excluding malignancy (diagnosis) and reestablishing flow of bile to the duodenum (drainage); the approach to diagnosis and drainage varies according to anatomic location (extrahepatic vs perihilar). For extrahepatic strictures, endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition is highly accurate and has become the diagnostic mainstay. In contrast, the diagnosis of perihilar strictures remains a challenge. Similarly, the drainage of extrahepatic strictures tends to be more straightforward and safer and less controversial than that of perihilar strictures. Recent evidence has provided some clarity in multiple important areas pertaining to biliary strictures, whereas several remaining controversies require additional research. The goal of this guideline is to provide practicing clinicians with the most evidence-based guidance on the approach to patients with extrahepatic and perihilar strictures, focusing on diagnosis and drainage.

Prophylactic EUS-guided gallbladder drainage prevents acute cholecystitis in patients with malignant biliary obstruction and cystic duct orifice involvement: a randomized trial (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and cystic duct orifice tumoral involvement have an increased risk for the development of acute cholecystitis after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement. We aimed to determine whether primary EUS-guided gallbladder drainage prevents acute cholecystitis in these patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized control trial in patients with distal MBO enrolled from July 2018 to July 2020. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: an interventional group treated with conventional ERCP biliary drainage with SEMS placement and subsequent primary EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and a control group treated with conventional biliary drainage alone. The primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of post-treatment acute cholecystitis, assessed for ≤12 months or until death. The secondary outcomes were hospitalization length and median survival time.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were included in the study: 22 in each group. Five patients in the control group (22.7%) and none in the intervention group experienced acute cholecystitis. The median hospitalization time was significantly lower in the interventional group than in the control group (2 days vs 1 day, P = .017). There was no difference in the observed median survival rates in the primary EUS-GBD group (2.9 months) and the control group (2.8 months) (P = .580).

CONCLUSION

In this single-center study of patients with unresectable MBO and occlusion of the cystic duct orifice, prophylactic EUS-GBD demonstrated a reduced incidence of acute cholecystitis.

Suprapapillary Biliary Stents Have Longer Patency Times than Transpapillary Stents-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic biliary stent placement is a minimally invasive intervention for patients with biliary strictures. Stent patency and function time are crucial factors. Suprapapillary versus transpapillary stent positioning may contribute to stent function time, so a meta-analysis was performed in this comparison.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases to find data on suprapapillary stent placement compared to the transpapillary method via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in cases of biliary stenosis of any etiology and any stent type until December 2020. We carried out a meta-analysis focusing on the following outcomes: stent patency, stent migration, rate of cholangitis and pancreatitis, and other reported complications.

RESULTS

Three prospective and ten retrospective studies involving 1028 patients were included. Suprapapillary stent placement appeared to be superior to transpapillary stent positioning in patency (weighted mean difference = 50.23 days, 95% CI: 8.56, 91.98; p = 0.0.018). In a subgroup analysis of malignant indications, suprapapillary positioning showed a lower rate of cholangitis (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.93; p = 0.036). Another subgroup analysis investigating metal stents in a suprapapillary position resulted in a lower rate of pancreatitis (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.95; p = 0.043) compared to transpapillary stent placement. There was no difference in stent migration rates between the two groups (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.17, 2.72; p = 0.577).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, suprapapillary biliary stenting has longer stent patency. Moreover, the stent migration rate did not differ between the suprapapillary and transpapillary groups.

Covered versus uncovered double bare self-expandable metal stent for palliation of unresectable extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized controlled multicenter trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In a recent randomized controlled trial, a double bare metal stent (DBS) showed better stent patency than single-layer metal stents. However, clear evidence comparing the efficacy of uncovered (UCDBS) and partially covered (PCDBS) DBSs for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is lacking. Therefore, we compared the clinical outcomes including stent patency of UCDBSs versus PCDBSs.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized study was performed in patients with distal MBO. The primary endpoint was stent patency. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with patent stents at 6 months, risk factors for stent dysfunction, overall survival, technical and clinical success rates of stent placement, and other adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Among 258 included patients, 130 were randomly assigned to the PCDBS group and 128 to the UCDBS group. The mean duration of stent patency of the PCDBS (421.2 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 346.7-495.7) was longer than that of the UCDBS (377.4 days; 95% CI, 299.7-455.0), although total stent dysfunction and stent dysfunction within 6 months were not different between groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that chemotherapy after stent placement was a significant factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, .570; 95% CI, .408-.796) and had a marginal impact on stent patency (hazard ratio, 1.569; 95% CI, .923-2.667). There were no remarkable differences in AEs, including pancreatitis, cholecystitis, and stent migration, between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PCDBSs compared with UCDBSs in patients with distal MBO has unclear benefits regarding stent patency and overall survival, although PCDBSs have a lower rate of tumor ingrowth. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02937246.).

The feasibility of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration for acute cholecystitis after self-expandable metallic stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction: a 10-year retrospective analysis in a single center

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) after metallic stent (MS) placement for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) have a high surgical risk. We performed percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration (PTGBA) as the first treatment for AC. We aimed to identify the risk factors for AC after MS placement and the poor response factors of PTGBA.

METHODS

We enrolled 401 patients who underwent MS placement for MBO between April 2011 and March 2020. The incidence of AC was 10.7%. Of these 43 patients, 37 underwent PTGBA as the first treatment. The patients' responses to PTGBA were divided into good and poor response groups.

RESULTS

There were 20 patients in good response group and 17 patients in poor response group. Risk factors for cholecystitis after MS placement included cystic duct obstruction (p<0.001) and covered MS (p<0.001). Cystic duct obstruction (p=0.003) and uncovered MS (p=0.011) demonstrated significantly poor responses to PTGBA. Cystic duct obstruction is a risk factor for cholecystitis and poor response factor for PTGBA, whereas covered MS is a risk factor for cholecystitis and an uncovered MS is a poor response factor of PTGBA for cholecystitis.

CONCLUSION

The onset and poor response factors of AC after MS placement were different between covered and uncovered MS. PTGBA can be a viable option for AC after MS placement, especially in patients with covered MS.

Does same session EUS-guided tissue acquisition and ERCP increase the risk of pancreatitis in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) are increasingly performed in the same session in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated adverse events (AE) after same session ERCP and EUS-TA.

METHODS

Patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-TA and/or ERCP with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement from January 2015 to April 2020 were included. Primary outcome was post-procedural pancreatitis (PPP). Secondary outcomes were other procedure-related AE.

RESULTS

We included 494 patients, of which 118 patients (24%) underwent same session EUS-TA+ERCP, 51 patients (10%) underwent separate session EUS-TA & ERCP, 90 patients (18%) ERCP-only and 235 patients (48%) EUS-TA only. PPP occurred in 22 patients (19%) after same session EUS-TA+ERCP and in 6 patients (12%) after separate EUS-TA & ERCP (p = 0.270). When adjusted for other known risk factors (i.e., difficult procedure), the difference in PPP remained non-significant (adjusted odds ratio 1.74 (95%-CI 0.65-4.67, p = 0.268). The incidence of other AE was similar, although the overall AE rate was significantly higher after same session EUS-TA+ERCP (36% vs. 20%, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

Same session EUS-TA+ERCP did not significantly increase the incidence of PPP, although overall AE were significantly higher. These data warrant further prospective studies.

Covered versus uncovered metal stent for endoscopic drainage of a malignant distal biliary obstruction: Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The role of a covered vs. an uncovered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is not clear. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of covered vs. uncovered SEMS for patients with MDBO after endoscopic insertion.

METHODS

A systematic meta-analysis of all relevant articles listed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. Fixed effects or random effects models were used to investigate pooled effects with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 2358 patients from 12 eligible studies. Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) was significantly longer for covered SEMS (mean difference, 45.51 days; 95% CI 11.79-79.24). Although there was no significant difference in the RBO rate, subgroup analysis in pancreatic cancer occupying more than 90% (PC) revealed that the RBO rates were significantly lower for covered SEMS (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.74). Stent migration, sludge formation, and overgrowth were significantly more common with a covered SEMS (OR 7.92, 95% CI 4.01-15.64; OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.89-5.59; OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.20-3.43, respectively). The rate of ingrowth was significantly lower for covered SEMS. There was no significant difference in total procedure-related adverse events between the two types of SEMS.

CONCLUSIONS

A covered SEMS is superior to an uncovered SEMS with respect to prevention of RBO in patients with MDBO, particularly those caused by PC.

Plastic or self-expandable metal stent: Which is the most suitable for patients with pancreatic head cancer in the upcoming era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy? A review

Obstructive jaundice is a major symptom of pancreatic head cancer, and although its amelioration is required before scheduling chemotherapy, the decision to perform biliary drainage for resectable pancreatic cancer has remained controversial. In recent years, the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer has been reported. Preoperative biliary drainage has become increasingly necessary, making the choice of stent an important one; thus, the longer the waiting period extends through neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the more durable stents - such as self-expandable metallic stents, rather than plastic stents - would be desired as an option. Still, there is insufficient evidence regarding surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis, and further confirmatory studies are needed. Through this review, we aim to provide an update on the characteristics of biliary stents and preoperative biliary drainage for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.

Modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stent for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Durable biliary drainage is essential in patients with pancreatic cancer in the era of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Plastic stent (PS) tends to occlude easily, and current metal stents are designed for nonresectable cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of a modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stent (M-FCSEMS) during the perioperative period in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma had a 12-mm M-FCSEMS (M-FCSEMS group) or 7-Fr PS (PS group) placed for biliary decompression before NACT or curative-intent surgery. The primary outcome was the re-intervention rate, and secondary outcomes were technical success, stent patency, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Endoscopic stent placement was technically successful in all 60 patients. Twenty-three patients underwent surgery and 37 NACT before surgery. Re-intervention was performed in 10.0% (3/30) of patients in the M-FCSEMS group and 36.7% (11/30) of patients in the PS group (P = 0.030). The stent patency at 180 days was 89.8% (95% confidence interval, 77.3-100.0%) in the M-FCSEMS group and 30.2% (95% confidence interval, 11.4-80.0%) in the PS group (P < 0.0001). Stent-related AEs occurred in 10.0% (3/30) in the M-FCSEMS group and 40.0% (12/30) in the PS group (P = 0.015). Surgery-related AEs occurred in 10.5% (2/19) and 14.3% (3/21) in the M-FCSEMS and PS groups (P = 0.549).

CONCLUSIONS

Modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stents are effective and safe for durable biliary drainage in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer during the perioperative period.

Fully covered metal biliary stents: A review of the literature

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) represent the latest advancement of metal biliary stents used to endoscopically treat a variety of obstructive biliary pathology. A large stent diameter and synthetic covering over the tubular mesh prolong stent patency and reduce risk for tissue hyperplasia and tumor ingrowth. Additionally, FCSEMS can be easily removed. All these features address issues faced by plastic and uncovered metal stents. The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively review the application of FCSEMS in benign and malignant biliary strictures, biliary leak, and post-sphincterotomy bleeding.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis after stent insertion in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: clinical outcomes of 107 patients

BACKGROUND

The outcome of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in malignant patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) after biliary stent insertion has not been investigated in a large group.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of PC for AC after stent insertion in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From April 2007 to February 2019, 107 patients (57 men, 52 women; mean age = 67.5 years; age range = 27-93 years) who had undergone PC for AC after biliary stent insertion were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 107 patients, 86 underwent biliary stent insertion by the endoscopic approach and the remaining 21 patients by the percutaneous approach. All patients were classified into three groups: those with stent-induced AC; those with cancer-induced AC; and those with AC without mechanical cause (biliary stent, GB stone, or cancer invasion). The mean survival time, recurrence rate, symptom improvement, and cystic duct patency in each patient group were analyzed.

RESULTS

Stent-induced AC (n = 40, 37.4%) developed with a mean onset time of six days (range = 0-14 days), AC without mechanical cause (n = 27, 25.2%), 87 days (range = 15-273 days), and cancer-induced AC (n = 40, 37.4%), 137 days (range = 15-447 days) after stent insertion. Symptom resolution and significant improvement in laboratory test values were achieved in 95 patients (88.8%) within four days after PC.

CONCLUSION

PC is a technically safe and effective method for the treatment of AC after biliary stent insertion in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting to prevent acute cholecystitis in patients receiving FCEMS for benign biliary stricture

Background and study aims  Fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) are being increasingly used for benign biliary strictures (BBS); however, they are associated with risk of acute cholecystitis. Prophylactic endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETPGBS) can facilitate continuous gallbladder drainage and prevent acute cholecystitis from occlusion of cystic duct orifice by the FCSEMS. The aim of this study was to assess the technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety of ETPGBS to prevent acute cholecystitis in patients receiving FCSEMS for BBS. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database at a single center of all patients who underwent prophylactic ETPGBS with FCSEMS for BBS between December 1, 2016 and November 30, 2020. Results  A total of 71 ETPGBS were placed during the study period. Sixteen patients (mean age: 66.4 ± 19.8 years; 81 % male) underwent ETPGBS prior to biliary FCSEMS during the same endoscopic session. FCSEMS were left in place (stent dwell time) for a median of 173 days (range: 69-473; mean 196 ± 121) with resolution of BBS and successful removal of ETPGBS and FCSEMS in 12 patients. There was significant improvement in total bilirubin level (5.25 ± 5.53 vs 0.94 ± 0.85 gm/dL; P  = 0.008). No episodes of acute cholecystitis or any other post-procedural complications were noted during the median follow-up of 337 days (range: 150-856; mean 394 ± 236). Conclusions  ETPGBS prevented stent-related acute cholecystitis with continued efficacy of FCSEMS for BBS.

Metal stents are safe and cost-effective for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreaticobiliary tumours

BACKGROUNDS

To compare the complication rates and overall costs of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) and plastic stents (PS) in clinically indicated preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) prior to a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

We conducted an Australian multicentre retrospective cohort study using the databases of four tertiary hospitals. Adult patients who underwent clinically indicated endoscopic PBD prior to PD from 2010 to 2019 were included. Rates of complications attributable to PBD, surgical complications and pre-operative endoscopic re-intervention were calculated. Costing data were retrieved from our Financial department.

RESULTS

Among the 157 included patients (mean age 66.6 ± 9.8 years, 45.2% male), 49 (31.2%) received SEMS and 108 received PS (68.8%). Baseline bilirubin was 187.5 ± 122.6 μmol/L. Resection histopathology showed mainly adenocarcinoma (93.0%). Overall SEMS was associated less complications (12.2% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.02) and a lower pre-operative endoscopic re-intervention rate (4.3 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.03) compared with PS. There was no difference in post-PD complication rates. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, stent type was an independent risk factor of PBD complication (OR of SEMS compared to PS 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.79, p = 0.02) but not for any secondary outcome measures. Upfront material costs were $56USD for PS and $1991USD for SEMS. Accounting for rates of complications, average costs were similar ($3110USD for PS and $3026USD for SEMS).

CONCLUSION

In resectable pancreaticobiliary tumours, SEMS for PBD was associated with reduced risk of overall PBD-related complications and pre-surgical endoscopic reintervention rates and was comparable to PS in terms of overall cost.

[Palliative endoscopy]

Endoscopy is the leading method in the diagnostics of gastrointestinal malignancies. With the increasing incidences of various tumor entities, a palliative treatment situation is already present in many patients despite an increasing number of screening strategies. Palliative endoscopy can make an essential contribution to alleviation of tumor-related symptoms, such as dysphagia, malnutrition, cholestasis, ileus and pain. Various approaches can be offered to safeguard the nutrition, e.g. percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), for maintenance of the gastrointestinal passage (stents) and secretion drainage or to drain congested hollow organs. Furthermore, in cases of inaccessibility or impassability of stenoses due to tumors, endosonographically assisted punctures offer the possibility to guarantee new drainage options or continuities by stent placement. In all interventions possible contraindications and complications must be taken into account.

Impact of sarcopenia on recurrent biliary obstruction after insertion of self-expandable metallic stent in patients with malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion is a big problem in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis in patients with malignancies. The purpose of this study is to clarify the relationship between RBO and sarcopenia.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with normal psoas muscle mass index (PMI) and 55 with low PMI were enrolled, based on PMI cut-off values. We analyzed the cumulative incidences and predictors of RBO, considering death without RBO to be a competing risk.

RESULTS

In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 60-, 180-, and 360-day cumulative incidence rates of RBO were 0.0%, 12.2%, and 22.0% in the normal PMI group, as compared to 4.0%, 31.1%, and 55.0% in the low PMI group, respectively (log-rank P = .003). In competing risk analysis, the incidences were 2.9%, 2.9%, and 7.1% in the normal PMI group, as compared to 13.7%, 34.8%, and 51.7% in the low PMI group, respectively (P < .001). In multivariate Cox regression and Fine-Gray's analyses, hazard ratios of low PMI for RBO were 4.593 (95% confidence interval 1.673-12.61, P = .003) and 4.980 (2.045-12.13, P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia in MBO was an independent risk factor for RBO.

Covered metallic stent placement for biliary drainage could be promising in the coming era of neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy for all pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The role of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer is controversial because of the high incidence of stent occlusion before surgery. We sought to validate a suitable stent for biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)/neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC-RT).

METHODS

We evaluated patients who received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic head cancer between January 2013 and December 2019. A covered metal (CMS) or plastic stent (PS) was inserted in symptomatic patients for biliary drainage. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), success rate of endoscopic drainage, adverse events, and surgical outcomes were compared between the CMS and PS groups.

RESULTS

Occurrence rate of RBO was significantly higher with PS (97%) vs CMS (15%, P < .001), and time to RBO was significantly longer with CMS vs PS (not reached vs 40.5 days, P < .001). Delayed schedule associated with RBO for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly lower in CMS vs PS (14% vs 50%, P < .05). There was no difference in postoperative bleeding, operation time, complications, and rate of a microscopically margin-negative resection between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of CMS during NAC/NAC-RT allows for safe chemotherapy without causing cholangitis or biliary obstruction and for surgery to be performed.

Advances in stent therapy for malignant biliary obstruction

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), result of pancreatobiliary diseases is a challenging condition. Most patients with MBO are inoperable at the time of diagnosis, and the disease is poorly controlled using external-beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Biliary stent therapy emerged as a promising strategy for alleviating MBO and prolonging life. However, physicians find it difficult to determine the optimal type of biliary stent for the palliation of MBO. Here, we review the safety and efficacy of available biliary stents, used alone or in combination with brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy and advanced chemotherapeutics, in patients with pancreatobiliary malignancies and put forward countermeasures involving stent obstruction. Furthermore, 3D-printing stents and nanoparticle-loaded stents have broad application prospects for fabricating tailor-made biliary stents.

Usefulness of half-covered metallic stent placement in preventing acute cholecystitis complication in pancreatic cancer-induced distal biliary stricture

Background and Aim

A self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is commonly used for biliary stricture caused by pancreatic cancer. Covered SEMS may obstruct the cystic duct, causing acute cholecystitis. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of using a half-covered SEMS with an offset covered portion for preventing cystic duct obstruction.

Methods

Among 80 patients with half-covered SEMS placement for the treatment of pancreatic cancer-induced distal biliary stricture, 74 were followed up. The half-covered SEMS has a total length of 6 or 7 cm, and the offset covered part was 0.5-4.5 or 0.5-5.5 cm, respectively. Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) were performed during the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). IDUS findings and ENBD tube cholangiogram confirmed the cystic duct confluence. SEMS placement was performed on the second ERCP or several weeks after the initial tube stent placement.

Results

Half-covered SEMS placement was successful in all patients. However, four (5.4%) patients exhibited early complications, including acute cholecystitis in one patient and stent displacement in another. Over 30 days, cholangitis, tumor growth, and stent displacement occurred in nine (11.3%), five (6.3%), and two (2.5%) patients, respectively. The median stent patency was 71.1 weeks, and the median overall survival in patients with and without chemotherapy was 31.8 and 12.2 weeks, respectively.

Conclusions

With confirmation of the cystic duct confluence, half-covered SEMS placement may become a treatment option for distal biliary stricture caused by pancreatic cancer to prevent acute cholecystitis. Half-covered SEMS patency was comparable with that of covered SEMS.

Feasibility and efficacy evaluation of metallic biliary stents eluting gemcitabine and cisplatin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Effective endoscopic management is fundamental for the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). However, current biliary stents that are widely used in clinical practice showed no antitumor effect. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) may achieve a combination of local chemotherapy and biliary drainage to prolong stent patency and improve prognosis.

AIM

To develop novel DESs coated with gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CIS)-coloaded nanofilms that can maintain the continuous and long-term release of antitumor agents in the bile duct to inhibit tumor growth and reduce systemic toxicity.

METHODS

Stents coated with different drug-eluting components were prepared by the mixed electrospinning method, with poly-L-lactide-caprolactone (PLCL) as the drug-loaded nanofiber membrane and GEM and/or CIS as the antitumor agents. Four different DESs were manufactured with four drug-loading ratios (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%), including bare-loaded (PLCL-0), single-drug-loaded (PLCL-GEM and PLCL-CIS), and dual-drug-loaded (PLCL-GC) stents. The drug release property, antitumor activity, and biocompatibility were evaluated in vitro and in vivo to confirm the feasibility and efficacy of this novel DES for ECC.

RESULTS

The in vitro drug release study showed the stable, continuous release of both GEM and CIS, which was sustained for over 30 d without an obvious initial burst, and a higher drug-loaded content induced a lower release rate. The drug-loading ratio of 10% was used for further experiments due to its ideal inhibitory efficiency and relatively low toxicity. All drug-loaded nanofilms effectively inhibited the growth of EGI-1 cells in vitro and the tumor xenografts of nude mice in vivo; in addition, the dual-loaded nanofilm (PLCL-GC) had a significantly better effect than the single-drug-loaded nanofilms (P < 0.05). No significant differences in the serological analysis (P > 0.05) or histopathological changes were observed between the single-loaded and drug-loaded nanofilms after stent placement in the normal porcine biliary tract.

CONCLUSION

This novel PLCL-GEM and CIS-eluting stent maintains continuous, stable drug release locally and inhibits tumor growth effectively in vitro and in vivo. It can also be used safely in normal porcine bile ducts. We anticipate that it might be considered an alternative strategy for the palliative therapy of ECC patients.

Preoperative cholangitis is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative biliary stenting is required for patients with obstructive jaundice from pancreatic adenocarcinoma who are receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. While in most patients this approach results in durable biliary drainage, some patients develop cholangitis during neoadjuvant treatment. Further, several studies have shown that preoperative cholangitis in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies can result in substantially unfavorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative cholangitis in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Participants: all adult patients (n = 449) diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from January 1st, 2013 to March 31st, 2018 who pursued treatment at the Massachusetts General Hospital were screened. Of these 449 patients, 97 met final inclusion criteria of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intent to pursue curative surgery. Data were collected via retrospective chart review including baseline characteristics, survival, episodes of preoperative cholangitis, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

In patients completing successful pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery, preoperative cholangitis is associated with increased mortality (HR 2.67, 95% CI:1.16-6.13). This finding is independent of postoperative outcomes or tumor recurrence rate. The presence of cholangitis did not impact completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (92% vs 85%, p = 0.5) or ability to proceed to surgery (76% vs 75%, p = 1.0). Preoperative cholangitis was not associated with postoperative morbidity (42.1% vs 45.1%, p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

One episode of cholangitis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with increased mortality following successful pancreaticoduodenectomy, independent of immediate postoperative outcomes or tumor recurrence. Preoperative cholangitis does not affect ability to pursue neoadjuvant chemotherapy or complete successful surgery. Patients who develop cholangitis during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment phase may reflect a distinct phenotype of patients with PDAC with a complex and more challenging clinical course.

Covered and uncovered biliary metal stents provide similar relief of biliary obstruction during neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Preoperative biliary drainage with self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) brings liver function within an acceptable range in preparation for neoadjuvant therapy (NATx) and provides relief of obstructive symptoms in patients with pancreatic cancer. We compared fully-covered SEMSs (FCSEMSs) and uncovered SEMSs (UCSEMSs) for sustained biliary drainage before and during NATx.

METHODS

Patients with pancreatic cancer and planned NATx who need treatment of jaundice and/or cholestasis before pancreaticoduodenectomy were randomized to FCSEMSs versus UCSEMSs. The primary endpoint was sustained biliary drainage, defined as the absence of reinterventions for biliary obstructive symptoms, and was assessed from SEMS placement until curative intent surgery or at 1 year.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population included 119 patients (59 FCSEMSs, 60 UCSEMSs). Sustained biliary drainage was equally successful with FCSEMSs and UCSEMSs (72.2% vs 72.9%, noninferiority P = .01). Reasons for FCSEMS and UCSEMS failure differed significantly between the groups and included tumor ingrowth in 0% versus 16.7% (P < .01), and stent migration in 6.8% versus 0% (P = .03), respectively. Serious adverse event rates related to stent placement were not significantly different in both groups (23.7% [14/59] vs 20.0% [12/60], P = .66), as were acute cholecystitis rates when the gallbladder was in situ (9.3% [4/43] vs 4.8% [2/42], P = .68) for FCSEMSs and UCSEMSs, respectively. In our study, independent of stent type, predictors of reinterventions were 4-cm stent length and presence of the gallbladder.

CONCLUSION

FCSEMSs and UCSEMSs provide similar preoperative management of biliary obstruction in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving NATx, but mechanisms of stent dysfunction depend on stent type, stent length, and presence of the gallbladder. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02238847.).

Inoperable Biliary Tract and Primary Liver Tumors: Palliative Treatment Options

Primary liver tumors are most commonly hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Although surgical resection offers a chance for cure, these tumors generally present at a late, inoperable stage, necessitating an understanding of noncurative and palliative treatment options. These options include ablative therapies, including radiofrequency ablation; intra-arterial therapies, including transcatheter chemoembolization; biliary decompression; radiotherapy; systemic therapies, including traditional chemotherapeutic agents; and molecular therapies, such as sorafenib. Selection of nonoperative treatment depends on patient and tumor factors as well as institutional resources and expertise.

Partially Covered Versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents: Coating Nor Diameter Affect Clinical Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Jaundice is a common initial presentation of malignant biliary stricture. In patients with life expectancies that are greater than 3 months, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) offer a larger diameter stent with longer patency and fewer complications compared to plastic stents. There have been conflicting results in the published literature as to efficacy and safety between the various SEMS types and diameters. We compared stent coating (PCSEMS vs USEMS) and diameter on clinical outcomes regarding management of malignant biliary obstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a database of consecutive patients who underwent an ERCP with biliary SEMS placement (only 8 and 10 mm) between 2009 and 2017.

RESULTS

In total, 278 patients who had SEMS at ERCP for malignant biliary obstruction were included (213 PCSEMS vs 65 USEMS). The groups were demographically evenly matched. Clinical success rates and patency duration were not statistically significant between PCSEMS and USEMS (98.1% vs 95.5%, P = 0.36, and 302.5 vs 225.5 days, P = 0.72, respectively). Adverse event rates were similar between both PCSEMS and USEMS with regard to overall adverse events. Stent diameter did not have an impact on overall clinical success (98.9% vs 95.3%, P = 0.11) or patency duration (239 days vs 336 days, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Our comparison of PCSEMS versus USEMS and 8 mm versus 10 mm showed no difference in clinical efficacy or adverse events between the two SEMS coatings and diameter, illustrating that coating and size do not matter in regard to stent choice, despite prior suggestive data.

Modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stent versus plastic stent for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with resectable malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) may be better than plastic stents (PS) for preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) to relieve cholangitis or jaundice for resectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, modification of current FCSEMS designed originally for nonresectable MBO is needed to be a proper stent for PBD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible superiority of non-flared modified FCSEMS (M-FCSEMS) with 12-mm diameter and waist of central portion over PS in patients with resectable MBO.

METHODS

Eighty-five consecutive patients underwent PBD followed by operation from August 2015 to December 2017. In each M-FCSEMS and PS group, 29 patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative albumin and bilirubin levels.

RESULTS

The overall technical success rates of PBD using M-FCSEMS and PS were 100%. The time to operation was similar between groups (18.6 ± 10.8 vs 19.3 ± 11.6 days, respectively; P = 0.843). The prevalence of PBD-related adverse events (AEs) was 6.9% (2/29) in the M-FCSEMS group versus 27.6% (8/29) in the PS group (P = 0.037). Re-intervention before operation was required in 20.7% (6/29) of patients in the PS group but no patients in the M-FCSEMS group (P = 0.023). No differences were found between perioperative AEs in the M-FCSEMS and PS groups (27.5% vs 31.0%, respectively; P = 0.773).

CONCLUSION

Modified FCSEMS led to lower PBD-related AEs, re-intervention rate, and comparable perioperative AEs compared with PS. M-FCSEMS may be a potential novel stent for PBD in patients with resectable MBO.

[Relief of Obstruction in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer]

Pancreatic cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity, and its incidence is increasing as the population is aging. On the other hand, significant improvement in the prognosis has not occurred. The absence of early diagnosis means that many patients are diagnosed only when they develop symptoms, such as jaundice, due to a biliary obstruction. The role of endoscopy in multidisciplinary care for patients with pancreatic cancer continues to evolve. Controversy remains regarding the best preoperative biliary drainage in patients with surgically resectable pancreatic head cancer. In general, patients undergoing a surgical resection usually do not require preoperative biliary drainage unless they have cholangitis or receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If biliary drainage is performed prior to surgery, the patient's condition and a multidisciplinary approach should be considered. With the increasing life expectancy of patients with pancreatic cancer, the need for more long-time biliary drainage or pre-operative biliary drainage is also increasing. Strong evidence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a first-line and essential treatment for biliary decompression has been provided. On the other hand, the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as well as percutaneous biliary drainage has been also recommended. During ERCP, self-expandable metal stent could be recommended instead of a plastic stent for the purpose of long stent patency and minimizing stent-induced complications. In this review, several points of view regarding the relief of obstruction in patients with pancreatic cancer, and optimal techniques are being discussed.

Risk Factors for the Development of Stent-Associated Cholangitis Following Endoscopic Biliary Stent Placement

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To elucidate the overall risk and risk factors for developing cholangitis following biliary stent placement by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and to determine the clinical outcomes of these individuals.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 796 patients who had undergone 1127 ERCPs with biliary stent placement between 2007 and 2015 at a single tertiary care center. There were 91 episodes of stent-associated cholangitis (SAC) during the study period. Data obtained through the medical records included ERCP indication, patient factors (biliary anatomy, demographics, and comorbidities), stent characteristics (material, length, and design), change in serum bilirubin, stent indwelling time, rates and etiologies of bacteremia, and the mortality rate.

RESULTS

Those with SAC were more likely to have an anatomic biliary stricture (13.1% vs. 2.3%, p < .0001), with hilar and multiple strictures having the highest risk (19.1% vs. 11.6%, p = .04). The ERCP indication of malignant biliary obstruction was associated with higher rates of SAC (15.6% vs. 3.4%, p = < .0001). Rates of SAC were higher in those who failed to normalize total bilirubin (16.9% vs. 7.8%, p = .0005), and these episodes occurred earlier compared to those who normalized total bilirubin (median 30.5 days vs. 140.5 days, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at increased risk of SAC include those with an anatomic stricture, malignant biliary obstruction, and those who fail to normalize total bilirubin after biliary stent placement. Future protocols should be designed to reduce the risk of cholangitis in these populations.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2018

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board reviewed original endoscopy-related articles published during 2018 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and 10 other leading medical and gastroenterology journals. Votes from each individual member were tallied to identify a consensus list of 10 topic areas of major advances in GI endoscopy. Individual board members summarized important findings published in these 10 areas of adenoma detection, bariatric endoscopy, EMR/submucosal dissection/full-thickness resection, artificial intelligence, expandable metal stents for palliation of biliary obstruction, pancreatic therapy with lumen-apposing metal stents, endoscope reprocessing, Barrett's esophagus, interventional EUS, and GI bleeding. This document summarizes these "Top 10" endoscopic advances of 2018.

Risk Factors for Pancreatitis and Cholecystitis after Endoscopic Biliary Stenting in Patients with Malignant Extrahepatic Bile Duct Obstruction

Background/Aims:

For the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction, endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) has been widely accepted as a standard procedure. However, post-ERBD complications can affect the lives of patients. The purpose of this study was to identify the predictive factors for these complications, including the patient’s status, cancer status, and stent type.

Methods:

This was a retrospective analysis conducted in a single tertiary hospital from January 2007 to July 2017. The following variables were evaluated: sex, age, body mass index, cancer type, history of pancreatitis, gallbladder stone, previous biliary stenting, precut papillotomy, stent type, contrast injection into the pancreatic duct or gallbladder, cystic duct invasion by the tumor, and occlusion of the cystic duct orifice by a metal stent.

Results:

Multivariate analysis showed that contrast injection into the pancreatic duct was a risk factor for pancreatitis. Patients with a history of bile drainage showed a lower risk of pancreatitis. For cholecystitis, the analysis revealed contrast injection into the gallbladder and cystic duct invasion by the tumor as important predictive factors. Metal stents showed a greater risk of post-procedure pancreatitis than plastic stents, but did not affect the incidence of cholecystitis.

Conclusions:

Considering that contrast injection is the most important factor for both complications, a careful approach by the physician is essential in preventing the occurrence of any complications. Further, choosing the type of stent is an important factor for patients at a risk of post-procedure pancreatitis.

New antireflux plastic stent for patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the main problem with stent placement is the relatively short duration of stent patency. Although self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have a longer patency period than plastic stents (PSs), the higher costs limit the wide use of SEMSs. A PS with an antireflux valve is an attractive idea to prolong stent patency, but no ideal design for an antireflux PS (ARPS) has been proposed. We developed a new ARPS with a “duckbilled” valve attached to the duodenal end of the stent.

AIM

To compare the patency of ARPSs with that of traditional PSs (TPSs) in patients with unresectable distal MBO.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. This study was conducted at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Consecutive patients with extrahepatic MBO were enrolled prospectively. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ARPS or a TPS. Patients were followed by clinic visits or telephone interviews every 1-2 mo until stent exchange, death, or the final study follow-up in October 2018. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency. Secondary outcomes included the rate of technical success, the rate of clinical success, adverse events, and patient survival.

RESULTS

Between February 2016 and December 2017, 38 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, with 19 patients in each group, to receive ARPSs or TPSs. Stent insertion was technically successful in all patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of clinical success or the rates of early or late adverse events (P = 0.660, 1.000, and 1.000, respectively). The median duration of stent patency in the ARPS group was 285 d [interquartile range (IQR), 170], which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (median, 130 d; IQR, 90, P = 0.005). No significant difference in patient survival was noted between the two groups (P = 0.900).

CONCLUSION

The new ARPS is safe and effective for the palliation of unresectable distal MBO, and has a significantly longer stent patency than a TPS.

Endoscopic and Conservative Management of Chronic Pancreatitis and Its Complications

Chronic pancreatitis is a progressive inflammatory disease of the pancreas potentially giving rise to several complications. For this reason, patients need long-term care and treatment by medical, interventional, and sometimes surgical measures. This article reviews current state-of-the-art strategies and guidelines for treating chronic pancreatitis with conventional and endoscopic measures.

Stenting for Benign and Malignant Biliary Strictures

Benign and malignant biliary strictures are common indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Diagnosis involves high-quality cross-sectional imaging and cholangiography with various endoscopic sampling techniques. Treatment options include placement of plastic biliary stents and self-expanding metal stents, which differ in patency duration and cost effectiveness. Whether the etiology is benign or malignant, a multidisciplinary strategy should be implemented. This article will discuss general principles of biliary stenting in both benign and malignant conditions.

Primary Clinical Application of Y-Shaped Jogged Stent Implantation in Patients with Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of Y-shaped jogged stent in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

METHODS

A total of 196 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction treated by biliary tract stent implantation from August 2010 to August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen consecutive patients who were treated with Y-shaped jogged stent implantation were identified as the Y-shaped jogged stent implantation group. Seventeen matched patients undergoing unilateral stent placement combined with percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) were enrolled as the control group. Baseline characteristics of patients, stent patency time, and survival time were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the age, gender, tumor type and stage, biliary obstruction classification, bilirubin level at diagnosis, presence of metastasis, or chemotherapy between the Y-stent group and the control group (P > 0.05). One week after surgery, the reduction rate of bilirubin was significantly higher in the Y-stent group (88.2% vs 53.0%, P < 0.05). The mean stent patency time was longer in the Y-stent group (7.3 ± 1.0 months vs 5.7 ± 0.9 months, P < 0.05). The mean survival time of the Y-stent group (9.1 ± 1.5 months) was longer than the control group (7.2 ± 1.1 months, P > 0.05). There was no severe complication occurred in both two groups.

CONCLUSION

Y-shaped jogged stent implantation was a safe, feasible, and effective approach in the treatment of patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction, with the significantly prolonged stent patency time and survival time.

Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-interventional treatment with stents

Interventional treatment with stents in pancreatic cancer is a topic that developed during recent years and new fields of palliative stent therapy have evolved. The increasing life expectancy of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer increases the need for clinical and cost effective therapeutic interventions. Current literature, guidelines, practice and evidence were reviewed. Besides the most obvious biliary stenting via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), pancreatic and gastroduodenal stenting as well as percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) and the rapidly growing field of endosonographic stent implantation in the palliative care of patients with pancreatic cancer are being discussed from several points of view in this review.

Pain in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multidisciplinary, International guideline for optimized management

Abdominal pain is an important symptom in most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Adequate control of pain is often unsatisfactory due to limited treatment options and significant variation in local practice, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach. This review contends that improvement in the management of PDAC pain will result from a synthesis of best practice and evidence around the world in a multidisciplinary way. To improve clinical utility and evaluation, the evidence was rated according to the GRADE guidelines by a group of international experts. An algorithm is presented, which brings together all currently available treatment options. Pain is best treated early on with analgesics with most patients requiring opioids, but neurolytic procedures are often required later in the disease course. Celiac plexus neurolysis offers medium term relief in a substantial number of patients, but other procedures such as splanchnicectomy are also available. Palliative chemotherapy also provides pain relief as a collateral benefit. It is stressed that the assessment of pain must take into account the broader context of other physical and psychological symptoms. Adjunctive treatments for pain, depression and anxiety as well as radiotherapy, endoscopic therapy and neuromodulation may be required in selected patients. There are few comparative studies to help define which combination and order of these treatment options should be applied. New pain therapies are emerging and could for example target neural transmitters. However, until better methods are available, management of pain should be individualized in a multidisciplinary setting to ensure optimal care.