Comparison of distal primary obesity surgery endolumenal techniques for the treatment of obesity (with videos)

Endoscopic management of obesity and metabolic diseases

Obesity has become a global pandemic that is associated with a range of metabolic disorders. Traditional treatment options, such as lifestyle modification and anti-obesity medications, often exhibit limited efficacy and can lead to long-term weight gain, especially upon discontinuation of the medication. Although bariatric surgery is effective, its accessibility is constrained, and only a small percentage of eligible patients receive this intervention. Over the past two decades, endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have emerged as minimally invasive and effective alternatives for managing obesity and its related comorbidities. This article reviews primary gastric and small bowel EBMTs, their mechanisms of action, key supporting literature, and the metabolic outcomes associated with each device and procedure.

Endoscopic Weight Loss Options

Endoscopic therapies for obesity have emerged as safe, effective, and minimally-invasive alternatives to traditional approaches, including lifestyle modification, anti-obesity medications, and bariatric surgery. Currently, in the United States, 2 types of endoscopic weight loss therapies are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and are commercially available-intragastric balloons and endoscopic gastric remodeling. These devices and procedures are associated with approximately 10% to 20% total weight loss at 1 year and have distinct technical features, benefits, and risks that providers should be familiar with. This article will focus on the primary FDA-approved endoscopic treatments for obesity and also cover those in development.

Efficacy of anti-obesity medication (AOM) and endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR): Analysis of combination therapy with optimal timing and agents

Background and study aims Endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) and anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are effective weight loss therapies. While the efficacy of EGR and AOMs has been established, the effect of combination therapy and its optimal approach remain unknown. Patients and methods This was a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent EGR. Patients were categorized as: 1) monotherapy - EGR alone; 2) combination therapy - an AOM prescribed within 6 months of EGR; and 3) sequential therapy - an AOM prescribed greater than 6 months of EGR. Outcomes included percent total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months, response rate (≥ 10%TWL at 12 months), and serious adverse event rate. Results A total of 208 patients were included. Of them, 65 (34%), 61 (31%), and 82 (35%) underwent monotherapy, combination therapy, and sequential therapy, respectively. At 12 months, patients who received EGR+GLP-1RA combination therapy achieved the greatest weight loss (23.7±4.6% TWL), while those who began with AOM followed by EGR more than 6 months later had the lowest weight loss (12.0±7.7%TWL) compared with monotherapy (17.3±10.0% TWL) ( P = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). The response rate was 100% for EGR+GLP-1RA combination therapy and 56% for AOM followed by EGR sequential therapy ( P = 0.02). Conclusions Combining AOM with EGR appears to result in greater weight loss compared with other strategies, with GLP-1RA as the preferred agent and optimal initiation of both therapies occurring within 6 months of each other. Prolonged medication use prior to EGR appears to be associated with suboptimal weight loss, suggesting the importance of early referral for adjunctive therapy.

Endobariatric systems: Strategic integration of endoscopic therapies in the management of obesity

The escalating obesity pandemic and its comorbidities necessitate adaptable and versatile treatment strategies. Endobariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) can be strategically employed in a multipronged approach to obesity management, analogous to the way chess systems are employed to seize opportunities and thwart threats. In this review, we explore the spectrum of established and developing EBMTs, examining their efficacy in weight loss and metabolic improvement and their importance for a tailored, patient-centric approach. The complexity of obesity management mirrors the intricate nature of a chess game, with an array of tactics and strategies available to address the opponent's moves. Similarly, the bariatric endoscopist employs a range of EBMTs to alter the gastrointestinal tract landscape, targeting critical anatomical regions to modify physiological reactions to food consumption and nutrient assimilation. Gastric-focused EBMTs aim to reduce stomach capacity and induce satiety. Intestinal-focused EBMTs target hormonal regulation and nutrient absorption to improve metabolic profiles. EBMTs offer unique advantages of reversibility, adjustability and minimal invasiveness, allowing them to be used as primary treatments, adjuncts to pharmacotherapy or tools to address post-bariatric surgery weight recidivism. However, sub-optimal adoption of EBMTs due to lack of awareness, perceived costs and limited training opportunities hinders their integration into standard obesity management practices. By strategically integrating EBMTs into the broader landscape of obesity care, leveraging their unique advantages to enhance outcomes, clinicians can offer a more dynamic and personalized treatment paradigm. This approach, akin to employing chess systems to adapt to evolving challenges, allows for a comprehensive, patient-centric management of obesity as a chronic, complex and relapsing disease.

Novel Devices for Endoscopic Suturing: Past, Present, and Future

Endoscopic suturing has been described in many applications, including the approximation of tissue defects, anchoring stents, hemostasis, and primary and secondary bariatric interventions. Primary endobariatric procedures use endoscopic suturing for gastric remodeling with the intention of weight loss. Currently, the only commercially available device in the United States is the OverStitch endoscopic suturing system (Apollo Endosurgery). We describe devices of potential that are currently in design and/or trials as devices for weight loss by gastric remodeling, including USGI incisionless operating platform used for the primary obesity surgery endoluminal 2.0 procedure, Endomina used for the Endomina endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and EndoZip.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on primary endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies for adults with obesity

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on primary endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies for adults with obesity

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.

Combination Therapy of Endoscopic Gastric Remodeling with GLP-1RA for the Treatment of MASLD

PURPOSE

The mainstay of treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is weight loss. Endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are effective weight loss therapies. This study aims to assess the effect of combining EGR with GLP-1RA on liver-related outcomes and weight profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a prospectively collected registry of patients with MASLD and compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) who underwent EGR. Patients were categorized as (1) monotherapy: EGR alone and (2) combination therapy: GLP-1RA prescribed within 6 months prior to or after EGR. Outcomes included changes in noninvasive tests of hepatic fibrosis, weight profile, and insulin resistance status at 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (body mass index 40.7 ± 9.3 kg/m2) were included. Of these, 12 patients (40%) underwent EGR monotherapy, and 18 patients (60%) underwent EGR + GLP-1RA combination therapy. Combination therapy group experienced greater improvements in fibrosis compared to monotherapy group (alanine aminotransferase: reduction by 55 ± 23% vs 29 ± 22% (p = 0.008), NAFLD fibrosis score: reduction by 181 ± 182% vs 30 ± 83% (p = 0.04), liver stiffness measurement on transient elastography: reduction by 54 ± 12% vs 14 ± 45% (p = 0.05)). There were greater reductions in hemoglobin A1c and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance in combination therapy compared to monotherapy (p < 0.05). At 12 months, the combination therapy group experienced 18.2 ± 6.6% TWL, while monotherapy group experienced 9.6 ± 3.3% TWL (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MASLD and cACLD, combination of EGR with GLP-1RA is associated with greater improvements in hepatic fibrosis, weight profile, and insulin resistance compared to EGR alone.