1
|
Shitara K, Fleitas T, Kawakami H, Curigliano G, Narita Y, Wang F, Wardhani SO, Basade M, Rha SY, Wan Zamaniah WI, Sacdalan DL, Ng M, Yeh KH, Sunpaweravong P, Sirachainan E, Chen MH, Yong WP, Peneyra JL, Ibtisam MN, Lee KW, Krishna V, Pribadi RR, Li J, Lui A, Yoshino T, Baba E, Nakayama I, Pentheroudakis G, Shoji H, Cervantes A, Ishioka C, Smyth E. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with gastric cancer. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102226. [PMID: 38458658 PMCID: PMC10937212 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with gastric cancer (GC), published in late 2022 and the updated ESMO Gastric Cancer Living Guideline published in July 2023, were adapted in August 2023, according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with GC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with GC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), coordinated by ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different Asian regions represented by the 10 oncological societies. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with GC across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling and age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different regions of Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Shitara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
| | - T Fleitas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - H Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - G Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Narita
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - F Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Mainland China
| | - S O Wardhani
- Department of Internal Medicine Division of Medical Hematology-Oncology, Brawijaya University, Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - M Basade
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jaslok Hospital and Breach Candy Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - S Y Rha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - W I Wan Zamaniah
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - D L Sacdalan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, The Philippines
| | - M Ng
- Department of GI Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - K H Yeh
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - P Sunpaweravong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla
| | - E Sirachainan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - M-H Chen
- Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - W P Yong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J L Peneyra
- St. Peregrine Oncology Unit, San Juan de Dios Hospital, Pasay City, The Philippines
| | - M N Ibtisam
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, General Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - K-W Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - V Krishna
- Department of Medical Oncology, AIG Hospital, Hyderabad, India
| | - R R Pribadi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Pancreatobiliary Oncology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - J Li
- Department of Oncology, University of Tongji, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, Mainland China
| | - A Lui
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Philippines Medical Center ESM, Davao City, The Philippines
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - E Baba
- Department of Oncology and Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
| | - I Nakayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - H Shoji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Ishioka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - E Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian Y, Xie Y, Yi G, Wu F, Dang X, Bai F, Wang J, Zhang D. Prognostic Value and Therapeutic Significance of CCL Chemokines in Gastric Cancer. Curr Med Chem 2024; 31:7043-7058. [PMID: 39129286 DOI: 10.2174/0109298673315146240731100101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours of the gastrointestinal tract, which has a significant negative impact on human health. AIMS CCL chemokines play important roles in a variety of tumor microenvironments; nevertheless, gastric cancer has surprisingly limited associations with CCL chemokines. METHODS In our study, we comprehensively utilized bioinformatics analysis tools and databases such as cBioPortal, UALCAN, GEPIA, GeneMANIA, STRING, and TRRUST to clarify the clinical significance and biology function of CCL chemokines in gastric cancer. RESULTS The mRNA expression levels of CCL1/3/4/5/7/8/14/15/18/20/21/22/26 were up-regulated, while the mRNA expression levels of CCL2/11/13/16/17/19/23/24/25/28 were down-regulated. The chemokine significantly associated with the pathological stage of gastric cancer is CCL2/11/19/21. In gastric cancer, the expression level of CCL chemokines was not associated with disease-free survival, but low expression of CCL14 was significantly associated with longer overall survival. Therein, associated with the regulation of CCL chemokines are only 10 transcription factors (RELA, NFKB1, STAT6, IRF3, REL, SPI1, STAT1, STAT3, JUN and SP1). The major biological process and functional enrichment of CCL chemokines are to induce cell-directed migration. CONCLUSION These results may indicate that CCL chemokines may be immunotherapeutic targets and promising prognostic biomarkers for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonggang Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
| | - Yunqian Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Gastroenterology Clinical Medical Center of Hainan Province, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou City, Hainan Province, China
| | - Guirong Yi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
| | - Fanqi Wu
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
| | - Xiaoyu Dang
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
| | - Feihu Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Gastroenterology Clinical Medical Center of Hainan Province, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou City, Hainan Province, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, 986 Hospital, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Dekui Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Puhr HC, Reiter TJ, Preusser M, Prager GW, Ilhan-Mutlu A. Recent Advances in the Systemic Treatment of Localized Gastroesophageal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1900. [PMID: 36980786 PMCID: PMC10047169 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The overall survival expectancy of localized gastroesophageal cancer patients still remains under 5 years despite advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies in recent years. For almost a decade, immunotherapy has been successfully implemented as a first-line treatment for various oncological diseases in advanced stages. In the case of advanced gastroesophageal cancer, 2021 witnessed several approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies by different authorities. Although it is still a debate whether this treatment should be restricted to a certain subgroup of patients based on biomarker selection, immunotherapy agents are making remarkable steps in resectable settings as well. The Checkmate-577 study demonstrated significant benefits of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors and thereby obtained approvals both from U.S. American and European authorities. First results of further potential practice-changing clinical trials are expected in 2023, which might change the treatment armamentarium for resectable gastroesophageal cancers significantly. This review aims to demonstrate the advances of immunotherapy and targeted therapies in treatment of localized gastric, gastroesophageal junction and esophageal tumors and gives a short summary on promising ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lordick F, Carneiro F, Cascinu S, Fleitas T, Haustermans K, Piessen G, Vogel A, Smyth EC. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1005-1020. [PMID: 35914639 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 590] [Impact Index Per Article: 196.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- F Lordick
- Department of Medicine II (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology and Infectious Diseases), University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - F Carneiro
- Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ), Porto; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto; Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S)/Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal
| | - S Cascinu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Università Vita-Salute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - T Fleitas
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - K Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Piessen
- University of Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Lille;; CNRS, UMR9020, Lille; Inserm, U1277, Lille; CHU Lille, Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Lille, France
| | - A Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - E C Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Peritoneal surface malignancies comprise a heterogeneous group of primary tumours, including peritoneal mesothelioma, and peritoneal metastases of other tumours, including ovarian, gastric, colorectal, appendicular or pancreatic cancers. The pathophysiology of peritoneal malignancy is complex and not fully understood. The two main hypotheses are the transformation of mesothelial cells (peritoneal primary tumour) and shedding of cells from a primary tumour with implantation of cells in the peritoneal cavity (peritoneal metastasis). Diagnosis is challenging and often requires modern imaging and interventional techniques, including surgical exploration. In the past decade, new treatments and multimodal strategies helped to improve patient survival and quality of life and the premise that peritoneal malignancies are fatal diseases has been dismissed as management strategies, including complete cytoreductive surgery embedded in perioperative systemic chemotherapy, can provide cure in selected patients. Furthermore, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has become an important part of combination treatments. Improving locoregional treatment delivery to enhance penetration to tumour nodules and reduce systemic uptake is one of the most active research areas. The current main challenges involve not only offering the best treatment option and developing intraperitoneal therapies that are equivalent to current systemic therapies but also defining the optimal treatment sequence according to primary tumour, disease extent and patient preferences. New imaging modalities, less invasive surgery, nanomedicines and targeted therapies are the basis for a new era of intraperitoneal therapy and are beginning to show encouraging outcomes.
Collapse
|