Trio genome sequencing for developmental delay and pediatric heart conditions: A comparative microcost analysis

Narrowing the diagnostic gap: Genomes, episignatures, long-read sequencing, and health economic analyses in an exome-negative intellectual disability cohort

PURPOSE

Genome sequencing (GS)-specific diagnostic rates in prospective tightly ascertained exome sequencing (ES)-negative intellectual disability (ID) cohorts have not been reported extensively.

METHODS

ES, GS, epigenetic signatures, and long-read sequencing diagnoses were assessed in 74 trios with at least moderate ID.

RESULTS

The ES diagnostic yield was 42 of 74 (57%). GS diagnoses were made in 9 of 32 (28%) ES-unresolved families. Repeated ES with a contemporary pipeline on the GS-diagnosed families identified 8 of 9 single-nucleotide variations/copy-number variations undetected in older ES, confirming a GS-unique diagnostic rate of 1 in 32 (3%). Episignatures contributed diagnostic information in 9% with GS corroboration in 1 of 32 (3%) and diagnostic clues in 2 of 32 (6%). A genetic etiology for ID was detected in 51 of 74 (69%) families. Twelve candidate disease genes were identified. Contemporary ES followed by GS cost US$4976 (95% CI: $3704; $6969) per diagnosis and first-line GS at a cost of $7062 (95% CI: $6210; $8475) per diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Performing GS only in ID trios would be cost equivalent to ES if GS were available at $2435, about a 60% reduction from current prices. This study demonstrates that first-line GS achieves higher diagnostic rate than contemporary ES but at a higher cost.

The cost of proband and trio exome and genome analysis in rare disease: A micro-costing study

PURPOSE

Rare disease genomic testing is a complex process involving various resources. Accurate resource estimation is required for informed prioritization and reimbursement decisions. This study aims to analyze the costs and cost drivers of clinical genomic testing.

METHODS

Based on genomic sequencing workflows we microcosted limited virtual panel analysis on exome sequencing backbone, proband and trio exome, and genome testing for proband and trio analysis in 2023 Australian Dollars ($). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

Panel testing costs AUD $2373 ($733-$6166), and exome sequencing costs $2823 ($802-$7206) and $5670 ($2006-$11,539) for proband and trio analysis, respectively. Genome sequencing costs $4840 ($2153-$9890) and $11,589 ($5842-$16,562) for proband and trio analysis. The most expensive cost component of genomic testing was sequencing (36.9%-69.4% of total cost), with labor accounting for 27.1%-63.2% of total cost.

CONCLUSION

We provide a comprehensive analysis of rare disease genomic testing costs, for a range of clinical testing types and contexts. This information will accurately inform economic evaluations of rare disease genomic testing and decision making on policy settings that assist with implementation, such as genomic testing reimbursement.

Lessons Learned from Translating Genome Sequencing to Clinical Routine: Understanding the Accuracy of a Diagnostic Pipeline

The potential of genome sequencing (GS), which allows detection of almost all types of genetic variation across nearly the entire genome of an individual, greatly expands the possibility for diagnosing genetic disorders. The opportunities provided with this single test are enticing to researchers and clinicians worldwide for human genetic research as well as clinical application. Multiple studies have highlighted the advantages of GS for genetic variant discovery, emphasizing its added value for routine clinical use. We have implemented GS as first-line genetic testing for patients with rare diseases. Here, we report on our experiences in establishing GS as a reliable diagnostic method for almost all types of genetic disorders, from validating diagnostic accuracy of sequencing pipelines to clinical implementation in routine practice.

Genetic Diagnosis of Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders Using Whole Genome Sequencing

BACKGROUND

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) have diverse phenotypes. Their genetic diagnoses are often challenged by difficulties of targeting causative genes due to heterogeneous genetic etiologies. The objective of this study was to perform genetic diagnosis of children with NDDs using whole genome sequencing.

METHODS

This study included 78 pediatric patients with NDDs and their 152 family members for whole genome sequencing (WGS). All cases except one were families with at least two members. Seventy-five patients had previously undergone other genetic tests besides WGS. Detected variants were classified according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

RESULTS

Among 78 probands, 26 patients were genetically diagnosed with NDDs through WGS, showing a diagnostic rate of 33.3%. Of them, 22 cases had de novo variants (DNVs) identified through trio analysis. Of these DNVs, half were novel variants. Three structural variants, including a multiexon deletion, a contiguous gene deletion involving 13 Mb, and a retrotransposon insertion, were revealed by WGS. All cases except one had defects in different genes, consistent with the phenotypically diverse nature of NDDs. In addition, three patients were inconclusive, two of them had one likely pathogenic variant in a gene associated with autosomal recessive disease and the other one had no clinical phenotypes associated with the detected DNV.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience demonstrates the advantage of WGS in the diagnosis of NDDs, including detection of copy number variations and also the advantage of trio sequencing for interpretation of DNVs.