1
|
Li J, Cao H, Peng K, Chen R, Sun X. Hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer: An improved stent-change therapy for ureteral obstruction Stent-change for ureteral obstruction in cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 283:49-53. [PMID: 36773470 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ureteral stent replacement is a routine treatment for hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer. We developed an improved ureteral stent-change operation for hydronephrosis in cervical cancer patients and compared its outcomes with traditional stent change procedures. STUDY DESIGN Clinical data of hydronephrosis in cervical cancer patients who were admitted to our hospital from August 2014 to October 2019 were analyzed. We retrospectively reviewed 131 cervical cancer patients, out of which 43 cases included patients in the improved operation group, whereas 88 patients with hydronephrosis followed the traditional ureteral stent-change operation for ureteral obstruction. The outcomes of the two procedures were compared using the propensity score matching method. RESULTS As opposed to the traditional ureteral stent change strategy, the patients in the improved group required shorter operation time (p = 0.001) and higher success rate (p = 0.004). The FIGO stage (p = 0.046), the level of ureteral obstruction (p = 0.027), radiotherapy history (p = 0.01), stent replacement times (≤2times or > 2times) (p = 0.001), and serum creatinine level (≤200 μmol/L or > 200 μmol/L) (p < 0.001) were significantly different between the two groups before propensity score matching. Propensity score matching analysis was used to eliminate the clinical differences of 43 patients in the traditional group; however, the span of visual hematuria during the surgical complications was not included (p = 0.026) in the results. CONCLUSION An improved ureteral stent change operation is an advanced treatment option for cervical cancer patients suffering from hydronephrosis. In contrast to traditional ureteral stent change techniques, our developed strategy lowers complications such as visual hematuria but improves the success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Haiming Cao
- Department of Andrology, the Reproductive Medicine Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| | - Kang Peng
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Renfu Chen
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaolei Sun
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nóbrega L, Zanon JR, Andrade CEEMDC, Schmidt RL, Dos Santos MH, Dos Reis R. Prognostic role of hydronephrosis in the treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:ijgc-2022-003679. [PMID: 35973739 PMCID: PMC9484387 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstructive uropathy is present in almost 50% of patients with advanced cervical cancer and is associated with worse outcomes. OBJECTIVE To estimate the prognostic role of hydronephrosis and the impact of ureteral obstruction resolution in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing treatment. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IIIB to IVA treated in a tertiary oncologic referral center in Brazil between January 2009 and June 2018. Three different groups were evaluated: (I) without hydronephrosis, (II) with hydronephrosis and urinary diversion, and (III) with hydronephrosis but no urinary diversion. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests estimated overall survival and progression-free survival based on the presence of hydronephrosis and urinary diversion. Clinicopathological variables were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model for overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS A total of 151 patients were evaluated: group I - 62 (41.1%); II - 44 (29.1%), and III - 45 (29.8%). Stage, histological type or grade, tumor size, parametrial or lymph node involvement were not statistically different between groups. Group I had more favorable overall survival than groups II (p<0.003) and III (p<0.02); however, no difference was noted between groups II and III. Progression-free survival was similar between groups (log-rank test p=0.95). Univariate analysis revealed hydronephrosis (p=0.002) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (p<0.001) as a prognostic factor for worse overall survival; while tumor size (p=0.023), pelvic lymphadenopathy (p=0.015), and histological type (p=0.03) were associated with worse progression-free survival. On multivariate analysis, hydronephrosis remained as an independently associated factor with worse overall survival (HR=2.06; 95% CI 1.12 to 3.79, p=0.02). CONCLUSION Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with hydronephrosis had lower overall survival even after controlling for potential confounding factors, but no difference in progression-free survival. Urinary diversion showed no impact on overall survival or progression-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro Nóbrega
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Jeferson Rodrigo Zanon
- Department of Palliative Care and Nephrology, Cancer Hospital of Jales - Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Ricardo Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng G, Zhong W, Pearle M, Choong S, Chew B, Skolarikos A, Liatsikos E, Pal SK, Lahme S, Durutovic O, Farahat Y, Khadgi S, Desai M, Chi T, Smith D, Hoznek A, Papatsoris A, Desai J, Mazzon G, Somani B, Eisner B, Scoffone CM, Nguyen D, Ferretti S, Giusti G, Saltirov I, Maroccolo MV, Gökce MI, Straub M, Bernardo N, Lantin PL, Saulat S, Gamal W, Denstedt J, Ye Z, Sarica K. European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:588-597. [PMID: 33741299 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol. OBJECTIVE To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus. CONCLUSIONS Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL. PATIENT SUMMARY Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist's experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Simon Choong
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ben Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Evangelos Liatsikos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Sven Lahme
- Department of Urology, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Otas Durutovic
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Urology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sanjay Khadgi
- Department of Urology, Vayodha Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Mahesh Desai
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Thomas Chi
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daron Smith
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andras Hoznek
- Department of Urology, Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | | | - Janak Desai
- Department of Urology, Samved Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Brian Eisner
- Deparment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Stefania Ferretti
- Department of Urology, Hospital and University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Iliya Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Mehmet Ilker Gökce
- Department of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Sherjeel Saulat
- Department of Urology, Sindh Institution of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Wael Gamal
- Department of Urology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt
| | - John Denstedt
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University, Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang YR, Chen SJ, Yen PY, Huang CP, Chiu LT, Lin WC, Chen HY, Chen YH, Chen WC. Hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer is an indicator of poor outcome: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e24182. [PMID: 33578522 PMCID: PMC7886411 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000024182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a common malignancy in women. The presence of hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer can be a challenging clinical problem. The appropriate management of these patients and the prediction of their outcomes are concerns among gynecologists, urologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and nephrologists. We enrolled a total of 2225 patients with cervical cancer over a 12-year period from the nationwide database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Bureau. Among them, 445 patients had concomitant hydronephrosis. The remaining 1780 patients without hydronephrosis were randomly enrolled as a control group for the analysis of associated factors. The results indicated that the proportions of patients with hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes were significantly higher in the hydronephrosis group. The hydronephrosis group showed a higher all-cause mortality than the non-hydronephrosis group (adjusted hazard ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 2.24-4.15, P < .001). The rates of nephrectomy and stone disease were also significantly higher in the hydronephrosis group. A higher percentage of other cancers was also observed in the hydronephrosis group than in the non-hydronephrosis group (12.36% vs 8.99%, respectively). This study shows that cervical cancer with hydronephrosis may have a higher morbidity and mortality than cervical cancer without hydronephrosis. Other factors such as human papilloma virus vaccination, smoking, and cancer staging need to be further studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-Rong Yang
- Department of Urology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Szu-Ju Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital
| | - Pin-Yeh Yen
- Department of Urology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Lu-Ting Chiu
- Department of Urology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Wu-Chou Lin
- Department of Urology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
| | - Huey-Yi Chen
- Department of Urology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University
| | - Yung-Hsiang Chen
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University
- Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chen
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University
- Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|