Comparison of supine-prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods in the treatment of kidney stones in pediatric patients: prospective randomized study

Mini-PCNL is one of the most effective surgical methods in the treatment of kidney stones in pediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to compare PCNL in the supine-prone position in pediatric patients (especially operation time, postop complications, hospital stay and stone-free rates).We conducted our study in a randomized and prospective manner. Patients with lower pole stones larger than 1 cm, stones larger than 1.5 cm in the pelvis, upper pole, midpole or multiple locations, and patients who did not respond to ESWL or whose family that preferred mini-PCNL to be the primary treatment were included in the study. Patients with any previous kidney stone surgery, patients with coagulation disorders and patients with retrorenal colon were excluded from the study. Between 2021 and 2023, a total of 144 patients underwent PCNL. 68 of these patients had supine PCNL and 76 prone PCNL. Postoperative Clavien grade1 complication occurred in a total of 7 patients in the prone position; Clavien grade1 complication occurred in 1 patient in the supine position. The mean operation time for prone PCNL was 119.88 ± 28.32 min, and the mean operative time for supine PCNL was 98.12 ± 14.97 the mean hospitalization time in prone PCNL was 3.56 ± 1.12 days, and 3.00 ± 0.85 days in supine PCNL. In conclusion, supine PCNL is a safe and effective method in the treatment of pediatric kidney stones and postoperative complications were observed to be less; the operation time and hospital stay were shorter in supine PCNL.

Radiation exposure of patients during endourological procedures

PURPOSE

Considering the existing gaps in the literature regarding patient radiation dose (RD) and its associated risks, a systematic review of the literature on RD was conducted, focusing on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), and ureteroscopy (URS).

METHODS

Two authors conducted a literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify studies on RD during endourological procedures. Two thousand two hundred sixty-six articles were screened. Sixty-five publications met the inclusion criteria using the PRISMA standards.

RESULTS

RD was generally highest for PCNL, reaching levels up to 33 mSv, 28,700 mGycm2, and 430.8 mGy. This was followed by SWL, with RD reaching up to 7.32 mSv, 13,082 mGycm2, and 142 mGy. URS demonstrated lower RD, reaching up to 6.07 mSv, 8920 mGycm2, and 46.99 mGy. Surgeon experience and case load were inversely associated with RD. Strategies such as optimizing fluoroscopy settings, implementing ultrasound (US), and following the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle minimized RD.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review analyzing RD, which was generally highest during PCNL, followed by SWL and URS. There is no specific RD limit for these procedures. Implementation of strategies such as optimizing fluoroscopy settings, utilizing US, and adhering to the ALARA principle proved effective in reducing RD. However, further research is needed to explore the factors influencing RD, assess their impact on patient outcomes, and establish procedure-specific reference levels for RD.

Super-mini PCNL (SMP) with suction versus standard PCNL for the management of renal calculi of 1.5 cm-3 cm: a randomized controlled study from a university teaching hospital

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of super-mini PCNL (SMP, 14 Fr) when compared to standard PCNL (sPCNL, 24-30 Fr) in the management of renal calculi of size ranging from 1.5 to 3 cm.

METHODS

From February 2021 to January 2022, a total of 100 patients were randomized to either SMP group or sPCNL group in a 1:1 ratio (50 in each group) using computer-generated simple randomization. Demographic data, stone characteristics, operative times, perioperative complications, blood transfusions, postoperative drop in haemoglobin, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay and stone-free rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Mean stone volume (2.41 cm2 vs 2.61 cm2) and stone-free rates (98% vs 94%, p = 0.14) were similar in both the SMP and sPCNL groups, respectively. The SMP group had significantly longer mean operative times (51.62 ± 10.17 min vs 35.6 ± 6.8 min, p = 0.03). Intraoperative calyceal injury (1/50 vs 7/50, p = 0.42) and mean postoperative drop in haemoglobin (0.8 ± 0.7 g/dl vs 1.2 ± 0.81, p = 0.21) were lower in the SMP group, but not statistically significant. SMP group showed significantly lower mean postoperative pain VAS scores (5.4 ± 0.7 vs 5.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.03) and mean duration of hospital stay (28.38 ± 3.6 h vs 39.84 ± 3.7 h, p = 0.0001). Complications up to Clavien grade 2 were comparable, with grade ≥ 3 complications higher in the standard group, but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Super-mini PCNL is equally effective as standard PCNL in treating renal calculi up to 3 cm, with significantly reduced postoperative pain and duration of hospital stay and lower risk of Clavien grade ≥ 3 complications, although with higher operative times.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for De Novo Urolithiasis After Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Introduction and Objective: Renal transplantation is the treatment for end-stage renal disease that offers better quality of life and survival. Among the possible complications that might affect allografts, urolithiasis might have severe consequences, causing acute kidney injury (AKI) or septic events in immunocompromised patients. Allograft stones might be treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this Cochrane style review was to assess the safety and efficacy of PCNL in patients with renal transplant. Methods: A comprehensive search in the literature was performed including articles between July 1982 and June 2023, with only English original articles selected for this review. Results: The final review encompassed nine articles (108 patients). The mean age was 46.4 ± 8.7 years, with a male:female ratio of 54:44. The average time from transplantation to urolithiasis onset was 47.54 ± 23.9 months. Predominant symptoms upon presentation were AKI (32.3%), followed by urinary tract infection and fever (24.2%), and oliguria (12.9%). The mean stone size was 20.1 ± 7.3 mm, with stones located in the calices or pelvis (41%), ureteropelvic junction (23.1%), or proximal ureter (28.2%). PCNL (22F-30F) was more frequently performed than mini-PCNLs (16F-20F) (52.4% vs 47.6%). Puncture was guided by ultrasound (42.9%), fluoroscopy (14.3%), or both (42.9%). The stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rates were 92.95% (range: 77%-100%) and 5.5%, respectively, with only one major complication reported. Postoperatively, a ureteral stent and nephrostomy were commonly placed in 47%, with four patients needing a second look PCNL. During an average follow-up of 32.5 months, the recurrence rate was 3.7% (4/108), and the mean creatinine level was 1.37 ± 0.28 mg/dL. Conclusions: PCNL remains a safe and effective option in de novo allograft urolithiasis, allowing to treat large stones in one-step surgery. A good SFR is achieved with a low risk of minor complications. These patients should be treated in an endourology center in conjunction with the renal or transplant team.

The gender gap in stone-related surgery: A comprehensive analysis from an Israeli perspective

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the gender gap in the context of stone-related surgery within an Israeli population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative databases from Clalit Health Services to identify adults aged 18 and above who had their initial surgical treatment for upper tract urolithiasis. We employed descriptive statistics to outline the baseline patient characteristics, and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend was utilized to analyze surgical trends.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2020, a total of 36,624 adult patients underwent surgical treatment for upper tract urinary stones. The mean age of patients was 55.01 years (standard deviation (SD) 16.6) for ureteroscopy (URS), 55.05 years (SD 15.1) for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), and 51.07 years (SD 15.1) for shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). When considering the distribution of procedures by gender, males accounted for 69.5% of URS cases, 58.3% of PCNL cases, and 70.6% of SWL cases, whereas females represented 30.5%, 41.7%, and 29.4% of URS, PCNL, and SWL cases, respectively. Across all surgical modalities, the male-to-female ratio exhibited fluctuations without a consistent trend, with both increases and decreases observed. In URS, the ratio saw a modest increase from 1.967 in 2003 to 2.173 in 2020. For PCNL, the ratio initially increased from 2.361 in 2003 to 2.549 in 2014, followed by subsequent fluctuations, but an overarching trend was not apparent. In contrast, for SWL, the ratio decreased from 2.15 in 2003 to 1.32 in 2020, with varying changes in between.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the dynamic nature of gender gap in stone-related surgery outcomes. While the male-to-female ratio exhibited fluctuations over a 17-year period, no consistent trend emerged. The absence of a clear trend underscores the complex and multifaceted factors influencing the gender gap in urolithiasis.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of tubeless vs. conventional mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with Escherichia coli bacteriuria

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteriuria. We conducted a retrospective review of 84 patients with E. coli bacteriuria who underwent PCNL. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether a nephrostomy tube is placed at the end of the procedure. Preoperative clinical data, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were compared. Then, regression analysis of factors predicting success rate of PCNL in patients with E. coli bacteriuria was performed. After PCNL, residual fragments ≤ 4 mm were considered as success. At baseline, the two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, BMI, underlying disease, hydronephrosis, stone characteristics, and urinalysis. Postoperative fever occurred in 1 patient (3.8%) in the tubeless PCNL group, and in 5 patients (8.6%) in the conventional PCNL group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of successful rate, decrease in hemoglobin, pain scores, blood transfusion, and hospitalization expenses. However, the tubeless PCNL group had significantly shorter operative time (60 vs. 70 min, p = 0.033), indwelling time of catheter (2 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), and hospital stays (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001) than the conventional PCNL group. In the analysis of factors predicting success, the stone diameter, stone burden, and operative time were associated with success rate of PCNL. It is safe and effective to perform tubeless PCNL in patients with E. coli bacteriuria. Compared to conventional PCNL, tubeless PCNL accelerates patient recovery and shortens hospital stays.

Urological Guidelines for Kidney Stones: Overview and Comprehensive Update

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines are published by urological organisations for various conditions, including urolithiasis. In this paper, we provide guidance on the management of kidney stone disease (KSD) and compare the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urologists (EAU) guidelines.

METHODS

We evaluate and appraise the evidence and grade of recommendation provided by the AUA and EAU guidelines on urolithiasis (both surgical and medical management).

RESULTS

Both the AUA and EAU guidelines provide guidance on the type of imaging, treatment options, and medical therapies and advice on specific patient groups, such as in paediatrics and pregnancy. While the guidelines are generally aligned and based on evidence, some subtle differences exist in the recommendations, but both are generally unanimous for the majority of the principles of management.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that the guidelines should undergo regular updates based on recently published material, and while these guidelines provide a framework, treatment plans should still be personalised, respecting patient preferences, surgical expertise, and various other individual factors, to offer the best outcome for kidney stone patients.

Review of efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

Prior literature reviews have assessed the efficacy and safety of outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with "outpatient" defined as discharge within twenty-four hours of surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first literature review analyzing ambulatory PCNLs (aPCNL) defined as hospital discharge on the same day as surgery. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after PCNL.

METHODS

We conducted a search in the PubMed database for key search terms including "ambulatory PCNL", "ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "outpatient PCNL", "outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy", and "day surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy". We reviewed articles defining "ambulatory" as discharge the same day the PCNL was performed. 13 papers were identified in our search.

RESULTS

Overall, we found no difference in complication rates, emergency department visits, and postoperative admissions when comparing outpatient PCNL to inpatient PCNL, and to previously published statistics for inpatient PCNL. Some studies even showed lower rates of adverse outcomes in ambulatory cohorts when compared to inpatient cohorts. Additionally, ambulatory PCNL conferred significant healthcare savings over inpatient PCNL.

CONCLUSION

This literature review suggests that ambulatory PCNL can be safely performed in both optimal and suboptimal surgical candidates with no significant increase in complications. Additional high-quality studies are warranted to further the evidence surrounding outpatient PCNL and its outcomes.

Surgical Artificial Intelligence: Endourology

Endourology is ripe with information that includes patient factors, laboratory tests, outcomes, and visual data, which is becoming increasingly complex to assess. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to explore and define these relationships; however, humans might not be involved in the input, analysis, or even determining the methods of analysis. Herein, the authors present the current state of AI in endourology and highlight the need for urologists to share their proposed AI solutions for reproducibility outside of their institutions and prepare themselves to properly critique this new technology.

Is traditional stone clinic the optimal use of NHS resources?

There is no clear guidance on the efficacy of stone follow-up. NICE have been unable to make recommendations with current published evidence. The aim of this study was to understand the patient journey resulting in surgical intervention, and whether traditional stone follow-up is effective. A retrospective review of patients undergoing ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) over a 3 year period identified 471 patients who underwent these procedures to treat stone disease. Records were interrogated for the following: symptoms, mechanism of booking, reason for intervention, stone size, stone location, risk factors and previous follow-up. Of 471 patients who underwent intervention, 168 were booked from stone clinic follow-up (36%). Of these, 96% were symptomatic and 4% were asymptomatic. When risk factors were removed, this figure was reduced to 1%. Sepsis rate for emergency admissions differs between those followed up (13%) versus new presentations (19)%. There was no statistically significant difference in the outpatient imaging frequency between patients booked from an emergency admission (80% having imaging every 6 months) and those from the clinic (82%). Our Hospital provides on average 650 stone clinic appointments a year with a cost of £93,000. Given the low rate of intervention in patients with asymptomatic renal stones, a symptomatic, direct-access emergency stone clinic could be a better model of care and use of NHS resources. Urgent research is required in this area to further assess if this is the case.

A rare case report of renal vein embolization after failed selective angioembolization to treat delayed complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been considered the standard procedure for renal caliculi for its safety, shorter operative time, and cost-effectivity. Despite being minimally invasive, rare complications may still occur. This case presented a rare case of renal venous pseudoaneurysm after PCNL.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 34-year-old male was diagnosed with left lower calyx renal stone sized 14x13x8 mm with 388-571 Hounsfield Unit (HU). He underwent left mini PCNL with standard protocol. However, on two-weeks follow-up, gross haematuria was presented on emergency department admission. Patient underwent two times cystoscopy and blood clot evacuation. Postoperative contrast-enhanced CT showed saccular lesion sized 6.7 mm × 4.8 mm in the interlobar vein of left kidneys' lower pole. Patient was then consulted to Cardiothoracic-Vascular division, and undergone selective angiography and left renal artery embolization-coiling (VortX Diamond-18). Complaints and haemoglobin decline persists; thus, another attempt of embolization was performed with a different approach. Follow-up arteriography and venography showed complete obliteration of the aneurysm sac, followed by cessation of symptoms. This study is reported in line with SCARE criteria.

DISCUSSION

This is a rare case where a second embolization attempt (specifically via vein) was needed to overcome PCNL postoperative complication. Reviewing vascular complications risk factors after PCNL is crucial. This case report suggests complication management could be handled appropriately through procedures of selective angiography and embolization.

CONCLUSION

Coil embolization targeting the vein is a potentially effective and safe for selective cases of renal vein pseudoaneurysm. This case shows the importance of multidisciplinary approach and collaboration for better patient management.

A retrospective cohort study, analyzing trends in management of upper urinary tract stones in the adult Israeli population

OBJECTIVE

To assess trends of surgical intervention in adults with upper urinary tract stones in Israel.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study utilizing administrative databases held at Clalit Health Services, to identify all adults (⩾18 years) who underwent their first surgical treatment for upper tract urolithiasis. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize baseline patient demographics and surgical trends were analyzed using the Cochrane-Armitage test for trend.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2020, 36,624 adult patients were treated surgically for upper tract urinary stones. Mean age was 53.6 years (SD16.1). During the period investigated, the number of insured by Clalit Health Services increased by 25% and the total number of surgically treated stones increased by 98.7%. By type of procedure: Ureteroscopy (URS) increased by 351%, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) increased by 67%, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) declined by 79%. The number of procedures per 100,000 population grew from to 37.5 in 2003 to 58.05 in 2022. The percentage increase in total number of surgical procedures was 103% and 90% in males and females, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal significant increases in the total number of surgically treated stones over the investigated period. Notably, this increase far outpaced the growth in the number of individuals insured by Clalit Health Services. Further research and interventions are warranted to explore the underlying factors driving these trends and to develop targeted approaches for prevention, early detection, and minimally invasive treatment of upper urinary tract stones in Israel.

Regional versus general anaesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Several studies have compared the safety and effectiveness of general and regional anaesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aimed to compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia for patients undergoing PCNL.

Material and methods

For relevant articles, three electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until March 2023. A meta-analysis has been reported in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR Guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The final cohort analysis, comprised 3871 cases of PCNL, (2154 regional anaesthesia and 1717 general anaesthesia). Compared to general anaesthesia, the regional anaesthesia group had a significantly shorter length of stay (MD = -0.34 days, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.12, p = 0.002), lower postoperative nausea and vomiting rates (RR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.80, p = 0.026), lower complications grade III-V rates (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88, p = 0.004), and lower postoperative visual analogue pain score (VAS) at 1 hour (MD = -3.5, 95% CI -4.1 to -2.9, p <0.001). There were no significant differences in other outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions

Our results show that PCNL under regional anaesthesia is safe and feasible, with comparable results to those done under general anaesthesia. While patient selection is important, counselling and decision-making for these procedures must go hand in hand to achieve the best clinical outcome.

'Gear up and get ready': Collaborative curriculum for radiographers supporting percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the operating theatre

INTRODUCTION

Newly qualified radiographers often find working in the operating theatre (OT) challenging and intimidating. These perceptions, which inhibit confidence, may hinder their effectiveness in interprofessional teamwork, which may in turn adversely affect patient outcomes. A collaborative education programme was designed, building upon the foundations of competency-based education (CBE) and simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) to examine its potential in mitigating these perceptions. The objective of this research was to assess participants' experience and level of competency after attending the curated collaborative educational programme.

METHODS

The programme was developed based on the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model and comprises two teaching and learning phases: educational session and simulation. A collaborative approach was undertaken to develop an assessment checklist for the interprofessional simulation. Requirements for the simulation, such as scenario design, information and storyboard, task trainer, logistics, and learners' briefing, debrief, and feedback, were identified and assembled. The radiographers' performance was recorded using a practical skills assessment checklist and a theory assessment.

RESULTS

Twelve radiographers participated and showed improvement in their self-rating of learning objectives before and after the programme. The median (interquartile range) score achieved in the theory assessment, out of a possible of 11, was 9.00 (7.75-9.50). The median (interquartile range) score achieved in the simulation component, out of a possible of 16, was 15.00 (14.00-15.00). There was statistically significant difference in self-perceived performance in all learning objective domains.

CONCLUSION

The findings from the programme were promising. The use of simulation and an assessment checklist proved to be useful learning tools in preparing newly qualified radiographers for work in the OT.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Assessment checklists are valuable tools that should be considered to facilitate teaching and learning. The use of interprofessional simulation activities can support radiographers in developing knowledge, professional skills, and clinical competency. It should be conducted in a timely manner to facilitate the introduction to role understanding and effective communication.

Can Perioperative Antibiotic Choice Impact Rates of Infectious Complications After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Single-Blind, Prospective Randomized Trial

Objective: National guidelines recommend periprocedural antibiotics before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), yet it is not clear which is superior. We conducted a randomized trial to compare two guideline-recommended antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (cipro) vs cefazolin, on PCNL outcomes, focusing on the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Methods: Adult patients who were not considered high risk for surgical or infectious complications and undergoing PCNL were randomized to receive either cipro or cefazolin perioperatively. All had negative preoperative urine cultures. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including SIRS criteria, intraoperative urine culture, duration of hospitalization, and need for intensive care. SIRS is defined by ≥2 of the following: body temperature <96.8°F or >100.4°F, heart rate >90 bpm, respiratory rate >20 per minute, and white blood cell count <4000 or >12,000 cells/mm3. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled and randomized (79 cefazolin and 68 cipro). All preoperative characteristics were similar (p > 0.05), except for mean age, which was higher in the cipro group (64 vs 57 years, p = 0.03). Intra- and postoperative findings were similar, with no difference between groups (p > 0.05), except a longer mean hospital stay in the cefazolin group (2 hours longer, p = 0.02). There was no difference between SIRS episodes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Despite the relatively broader coverage for urinary tract pathogens with ciprofloxacin, this prospective randomized trial did not show superiority over cefazolin. Our findings therefore support two appropriate options for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing PCNL who are nonhigh risk for infectious complications.

Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis in an Italian Tertiary Referral Center: A Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: In recent years, the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis has increased in North America and Western countries, though it is endemic in developing countries. The aim of this study is to describe the experience of a tertiary pediatric referral center in the surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the experience of patients ≤ 16 years old affected by urinary stones who underwent surgery. Results: From April 2021 to September 2023, 31 pediatric patients underwent surgical procedures for stone diseases at our department: 13 preschool-aged (1-5 years) and 18 school-aged (6-16 years) children. During this period, 12 URSs, 17 RIRSs, and 2 PCNLs were recorded. Five patients had residual fragments at first, so three of them underwent a second endourological lithotripsy (2 RIRSs and 1 URS). Complete clearance was finally achieved in 27 patients. The stone composition was evaluated in 25 cases. Conclusions: Numerous innovations in the surgical treatment of pediatric urolithiasis have resulted from the development of smaller devices and new technology. Our results show how, in experienced centers, retrograde and percutaneous lithotripsy are safe and effective procedures for use in pediatric populations.

Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Technological advancements in laser lithotripsy are expanding into numerous fields of urology, like ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and benign and malignant soft-tissue treatments. Since the amount of research regarding lasers in urology has grown exponentially, we present a systematic review of the most recent and relevant advances encompassing all lasers used in urological endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using PubMed (May 2023) to obtain information about lasers for urological purposes. We included only recent data from published articles between 2021 and 2023 or articles ahead of print.

RESULTS

Lasers are widely used in lithotripsy for ureteric, renal, and bladder stones, benign prostate surgery, and bladder and upper tract tumor ablation. While the holmium (Ho:YAG) laser is still predominant, there seems to be more emphasis on pulse modulation and newer lasers such as thulium fiber laser (TFL) and pulsed Tm:YAG laser.

CONCLUSION

The use of lasers and related technological innovations have shown increasing versatility, and over time have proven to be invaluable in the management of stone lithotripsy, treatment of benign and malignant prostate diseases, and urothelial tumors. Laser endoscopic treatment is heavily based on technological nuances, and it is essential to know at least the basics of these technologies. Ultimately the choice of laser used depends on its availability, cost, surgeon experience and expertise.

Percutaneous treatment of stone containing calyceal diverticula: Strategies and outcomes from a University teaching hospital in a developing country

INTRODUCTION

There is a dearth of research available on the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of the modalities employed in treatment of diverticula after stone clearance by PCNL. We present our experience of various approaches employed in our institute for treatment of caliceal diverticulum after stone clearance by PCNL. We aimed to review the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of these procedures which can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these techniques in the treatment of stone containing caliceal diverticulum.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients diagnosed with caliceal diverticular stone was conducted. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) at the time of hospital discharge, determined by a combined nephroscopic/fluoroscopic assessment, and the obliteration of the diverticular sac. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of operative time, duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were evaluated. The mean diverticulum size was 23.2 mm, most common location was the superior calyx (30 (56.7%)). Group 1 (diverticular neck treatment + DJ stent) included 27 patients, group 2 (diverticular wall fulguration + PCN) included 18 patients and group 3 (PCN alone) included 8 patients. Mean operating time was highest in group 1 (80 min). Stone clearance was 100% in group 1, 91% in group 2 and 88% in group 3. Obliteration of caliceal diverticulum was highest in group 1 (90%). Mean duration of hospital stay was lowest in group 1 (3.2 days). Overall complications were lowest in group 2 (3/18).

CONCLUSION

PCNL followed by combination of diverticular wall fulguration and PCN or treatment of diverticular neck and DJ stenting is safe and effective in causing diverticular obliteration. Placement of nephrostomy tube alone was not found to be effective in causing diverticular obliteration in our study.

Camposampiero tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (tPCNL): Easy, quick, effective, safe

OBJECTIVES

To describe our technique to perform tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (tPCNL) using hemostatic matrix (i.e. Floseal®) for the closure of the percutaneous tract, developed through the experience gained in our endourology specialized center. To evaluate the procedure efficacy and safety.

METHODS

tPCNL performed in our center with Floseal® application from February 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and surgical data were collected in order to evaluate the success of the procedure and possible complications. Camposampiero technique is reported in detail.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (45 males, mean age 58 years old) were included. In all patients the procedure was completed successfully and in 88% of subjects no further treatments were necessary; a low complication rate (6.9%) was reported.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, tPCNL with Floseal application is feasible, safe, and effective.

PCNL in neurogenic bladder: A challenging population for both clinical management and analysis

Objectives

To review the management of patients with neurogenic bladder undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) at our institution with the aim of assessing peri-operative morbidity.

Subjects/patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all neurogenic bladder patients who underwent PCNL at our hospital in the last decade with the aim of assessing peri-operative morbidity.

Results

A total of 298 PCNL were performed during the study period of which 58 were in patients with a neurogenic bladder or urinary diversion, 33 of which were in SCI patients. Preoperative demographic and stone characteristics, intraoperative data and postoperative length of stay and complications are summarised in table form.

Conclusion

PCNL remains an acceptably safe and efficacious treatment for upper tract stone disease in patients with neurogenic bladders and will continue to have a valuable role where SCI prevents alternative approaches such as ureteroscopy.

The effect of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on biomarkers of renal injury: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Observational studies on the association of endourological procedures with renal parenchymal damage are lacking. This randomized trial examined the effect of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPCNL) in comparison with miniaturized-PCNL (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for nephrolithiasis treatment on novel biomarkers of renal injury.

Methods

Seventy-five patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive sPCNL, mini-PCNL and RIRS for nephrolithiasis. The ratios of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) normalized for urinary creatinine (Cr) were calculated from urine samples collected at baseline (2-h preoperatively) and at 2-, 6-, 24- and 48-h postoperatively. Two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements was used to evaluate the effects of type of procedure and time on studied biomarkers.

Results

Between baseline and 2-h postoperatively, no significant differences were observed in NGAL/Cr changes between sPCNL [median (interquartile range) 9.46 (4.82-14.9)], mini-PCNL [12.78 (1.69-25.24)] and RIRS [6.42 (2.61-23.90)] (P = .902). Similarly, no between-group differences were observed for KIM-1/Cr (P = .853) and IL-18 (P = .980) at 2 h, and all biomarkers at any time-point postoperatively. Within-groups, significant increases from baseline were noted for NGAL/Cr (sPCNL, P < .001; mini-PCNL, P < .001; RIRS, P = .001), KIM-1/Cr and IL-18/Cr at 2 h; progressively lower increases from baseline were noted in all groups for KIM-1/Cr and IL-18/Cr at 6-, 24- and 48-h postoperatively. As such, a significant effect of time but not of type of procedure was evidenced with two-way mixed ANOVA. No significant between-group differences were observed in acute kidney injury incidence and complications.

Conclusions

The endourological procedures under study are associated with similar patterns of early tubular injury, detected by novel biomarkers, which is largely reduced within 48 h and no changes in glomerular function.

General versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred treatment for the removal of large kidney stones, sized >20 mm. However, there is still an ongoing debate concerning the best anesthesia for PCNL. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between general and spinal anesthesia for PCNL. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. A systematic, electronic literature search was performed in several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar until July 1 st, 2022. The quality of the articles was examined using Crombie's Items (for non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) and Jadad Scale (for RCTs). The outcomes assessed were operation time, fluoroscopy time, length of stay, stone-free rate, overall complication rate, specific postoperative complications, cost, pain score, and postoperative analgesic requirement. The article selection was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We assessed four RCTs and eight retrospective studies. Meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using the Review Manager 5.3. Results: General anesthesia resulted in fewer Clavien-Dindo grade II (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 - 0.94; p=0.02), major complications (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45 - 0.94; p=0.02, and lower transfusion rates (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53 - 0.94; p=0.02). Whereas spinal anesthesia resulted in faster operation time (Mean Difference: -12.98; 95% CI: -20.56 - -5.41; p<0.001, fluoroscopy time (MD: -26.15; 95% CI: -42.79 - -9.50; p=0.002), reduced length of stay (MD: -0.47; 95% CI: -0.75 - 0.20; p<0.001), and lower postoperative analgesic requirement and cost. No significant difference in stone-free rate (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.26; p=0.37). PCNL performed using either general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia is equally safe and effective. Conclusions: Each method of anesthesia has its own advantages and disadvantages. The final choice between general and spinal anesthesia should be based on the patient's condition and surgical team preference.

Opioid-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an initial experience

INTRODUCTION

The opioid epidemic in the United States is an ongoing public health crisis that is in part fueled by excessive prescribing by physicians. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a procedure that conventionally involves opioid prescriptions for adequate post-operative pain control. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a non-opioid pain regimen by evaluating post-operative outcomes in PCNL patients discharged without opioids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As a quality improvement measure to reduce opioid consumption our department began routinely prescribing oral ketorolac instead of oxycodone-acetaminophen for pain control after PCNL. We retrospectively compared patients undergoing PCNL who had received ketorolac prescriptions (NSAID) to those who received oxycodone-acetaminophen prescriptions (NARC). Demographic, operative, and post-operative factors were obtained and compared in both groups. Peri-operative factors and demographics were compared using either Chi-squared tests, Mann-Whitney U tests. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups using Chi-squared tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether ketorolac use was an independent predictor of post-surgical pain-related encounters. Primary outcome was unplanned pain-related healthcare encounters inclusive of office phone calls, unscheduled office visits, and emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcome measures were non-pain-related healthcare encounters, hospital readmissions, pain-related rescue medications prescribed, and post-op complications.

RESULTS

There were similar demographics and peri-operative characteristics amongst patients in both cohorts. There was no significant difference identified between NSAID and NARC regarding unplanned pain-related encounters (8/70, 11.4% vs. 10/70, 14.3%, p = 0.614). However, NARC experienced more unplanned phone calls (42, 60% vs. 24, 34.3%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed only prior stone surgery was predictive of pain-related encounters after PCNL (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that there were no significant differences in pain-related encounters between those who received ketorolac and oxycodone-acetaminophen following PCNL. A non-opioid pathway may mitigate the potential risk associated with opioid prescription without compromising analgesia. Prospective comparative studies are warranted to confirm feasibility.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Labate et al.) is the standard procedure for the treatment of large (≥2cm) kidney stones. The patient can be in prone or modified supine position. The puncture is performed under fluoroscopy and/or ultrasound guidance. The stone-free rate seems to be comparable between miniaturized and standard PCNL. Procedures performed with smaller diameter instruments tend to be associated with significant lower blood loss, but longer procedure times. The limitation of the number of percutaneous tracts results in better preservation of the kidney function and lowers the risk of complications. The use of tranexamic acid during PCNL may be interesting for reducing the bleeding risk, the transfusion rate, and possibly the intervention duration. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

Adopting ultrasound guided PCNL in nephrolithiasis management

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve associated with the adoption of US guided PCNL and demonstrate that it can be carried out safely with results comparable to those obtained using standard PCNL.

METHODS

Prospective study with 65 patients who underwent PCNL between 2019 and 2020. all procedures were performed in supine position and an initial attempt to gain access to the kidney using US was made.

RESULTS

Mean procedure duration was 69.5 ± 27.8 min. Fluoroscopy was used with a mean dose of 276.68 ± 560.71 (cGycm3) and mean fluoroscopy time 40.25 ± 77.69 (s). Throughout the study there was a steady decrease in the use of fluoroscopy and amount of radiation to gain access to the kidney to only 25% at the study end. 76.5% of the patients were stone free at follow-up. Complication rate was 9.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroless US guided PCNL is safe, feasible and reproducible procedure.

Comparison of endoscopic versus CT assessment of stone-free status after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

This study is aimed to determine whether postoperative low dose computed tomography (LDCT) imaging is necessary after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of residual fragments (RF) is sufficient and avoidance of postoperative imaging with reduction of radiation exposure can be achieved. Data of all 610 patients who underwent PCNL in prone position in our institution from February 2009 to September 2020 was collected. Parameters such as age, gender, BMI, ASA-Classification, stone related parameters and the surgeon's assessment of stone-free status were analyzed. The LDCT performed postoperatively was compared to the intraoperative assessment of the surgeon regarding RF. The mean age of patients was 52.82 years; the mean BMI was 28.18 kg/m2. In 418 cases, the surgeon made a clear statement about the presence of RF and postoperative LDCT was carried out. The discrepancy between the two methods (surgeon´s assessment vs. LDCT) was significant at p < 0.0001. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the surgeon when assessing RF were 24.05%, 99.45%, 98.28% and 50%. Stone free rate (SFR) after primary PCNL was 45.57%. The overall SFR at discharge was 96.23%. Although the surgeon´s assessment of RF was reliable, postoperative LDCT imaging should still be performed if endoscopic stone clearance is suspected due to the high false negative rate and the low negative predictive value. The optimal timing of postoperative imaging following PCNL remains unclear.

Distal end of a ureteral double-J stent displaced into the contralateral ureter after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: a case report

We report displacement of the distal end of a ureteral double-J stent into the contralateral ureter after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in a 71-year-old man with a history of left kidney stones. Postoperative computed tomography imaging showed that the distal end of the left ureteral double-J stent was displaced into the right ureter, which resulted in persistent right renal colic when the nephrostomy tube was clipped and continuous urine leakage from the nephrostomy opening after the nephrostomy tube was removed. After the cystoscopic adjustment of the ureteral stent, the patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged home the next day.

The effect of no oral antibiotic versus 7 days oral antibiotic during discharge in double J stented patients on stent related urinary tract infection: A randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effects of 7 days oral antibiotic prophylaxis versus no antibiotics in the patients with DJ stents after 3 days iv antibiotic on discharge with respect to urinary tract infection and stent related symptoms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective randomized study in 90 patients being stented post PCNL/URSL. Group A: no oral antibiotics was given at the time of discharge, Group B: 7 days of oral antibiotic was given at the time of discharge. Patients were followed up and outcomes were assessed in the form of lower urinary symptoms (LUTS), urine culture and sensitivity at 1 and 3 weeks and DJ stent culture and sensitivity on removal at 3 weeks.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, gender, type of surgery (PCNL/URSL), duration of DJ stent between the two groups. Patients in group A and Group B have comparable UTI and stent related symptoms at 1 and 3 weeks respectively (p = 0.95 and p = 0.916 respectively). Similarly, there were no marked difference in urine culture at 1 and 3 weeks, respectively between two groups (p = 0.71 and p = 0.63, respectively). Overall there were no significant differences in Urinary symptoms, urine culture/sensitivity at 1 and 3 weeks and also DJ stent culture and sensitivity on removal at 3 weeks between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of UTI and stent related symptoms are same in both the groups. Therefore, prescribing oral antibiotics on discharge in selected patient with DJ stent has no added benefit and should be avoided.

Worldwide trends of practice and intervention in paediatric endourology: comparison of European versus Non-European responses

Introduction

The area of paediatric endourology is unique and is recognised to be challenging, and it requires a certain level of focused training and expertise. Our aim was to conduct a worldwide survey in order to gain an overview regarding the current practice patterns for minimally invasive treatments of paediatric upper urinary tract stone patients.

Material and methods

The survey was distributed between December 2021 and April 2022 through urology sections and societies in United Kingdom, Latin America and Asia. The survey was made up of 20 questions and it was distributed online using the free online Google Forms (TM).

Results

221 urologists answered the survey with 56 responses each from India, South America and UK and 53 responses from the rest of Europe (15 countries). In total, 163 responders (73.7%) managed paediatric stone patients in their daily practice. Of the responders, 60.2% were adult urologists and 39.8% were paediatric urologists. 12.9% adult urologists and 20.4% paediatric urologists run independent clinics while some run combined adult and paediatric clinics sometimes with the support of the nephrologists. Only 33.9% urologists offered all surgical treatments [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)].

Conclusions

Treatment of paediatric stones can vary according to country and legislations. Based on the results of this survey, minimally invasive methods such as URS and mini PCNL seem to have become more popular. In most institutions a collaboration exists between adult and paediatric urologists, which is the key for a tailored decision making, counselling and treatment success.

Percutaneous re-surgical approach for delayed bleeding caused by pseudoaneurysm following percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vascular complications included arteriovenous fistula and pseudoaneurysm can cause early or late bleeding and result in unstable condition. Selective trans-arterial embolization is the gold standard technique to manage arterial pseudoaneurysm. Herein, we present a case of pseudoaneurysm following PCNL and describe an alternative technique for its removal using a grasper under C-arm vision. Percutaneous re-surgical approach to post-PCNL hemorrhage due to pseudoaneurysm by using a nephro-grasper to pick up the renal artery pseudoaneurysm would be safe, effective and can provide a direct view of pyelocaliceal system for surgeons; And can be a proper alternative for angioembolization.

Migration of nephrostomy tube into right atrium during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in urology. Due to blind nature of the procedure unexpected events are inevitable. Misplacement of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) during PCNL into the venous system is one of the rarest complications causing great stress to both physician and the patient. Due to scarcity of data, no standard treatment has been proposed. Here, we present a case with misplaced PCN into venous system moving up to the right atrium and discuss its management with a review of the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

After stone removal of a 65-year old man by PCNL, PCN was passed through access sheath supposedly into renal pelvis but it actually misplaced into venous system and traversed into right atrium. The complication was diagnosed by immediate CT scan and managed by PCN pulling back without the need to perform open surgery.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Blind nature of PCNL makes it susceptible to inadvertent complications. Misplaced PCN into venous system is very rare, happening in about 13 patients worldwide. While some ended up open surgery, all of them were managed by pulling the PCN backwards. Our case is the first case in whom PCN traversed through IVC and reached right atrium during PCNL. Pulling back the PCN was a successful treatment in our case either.

CONCLUSION

While horrifying, misplaced PCN into venous system can be managed conservatively by pulling it backwards, even if it reaches the right atrium as happened in our case.

Outcome of Mini-PCNL Under Loco-Regional Anesthesia: Outcomes of a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Miniaturized PCNL (mi-PCNL) for stone disease is performed under a general anesthesia. However, the role of loco-regional anesthesia in mi-PCNL and its outcomes are not well defined yet. Here, we review the outcomes and complications of loco-regional anesthesia for mi-PCNL. A Cochrane-style review was performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews to evaluate the outcomes of loco-reginal anesthesia for URS in stone disease, including all English language articles from January 1980 and October 2021.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ten studies with a total of 1663 patients underwent mi-PCNL under loco-regional anesthesia. The stone-free rate (SFR) for mi-PCNL under neuro-axial anesthesia ranged between 88.3 and 93.6%, while it ranged between 85.7 and 93.3% for mi-PCNL under local anesthesia (LA). The conversion rate to another anesthesia modality was 0.5%. The complications ranged widely between 3.3 and 85.7%. The majority were Grade I-II complications and none of the patients had grade V complications. Our review shows that mi-PCNL under loco-regional anesthesia is feasible with good SFR and a low risk of major complications. The conversion to general anesthesia is needed in a small minority, with the procedure itself being well tolerated and a big step towards establishing an ambulatory pathway for these patients.

How I Do It: ERAS protocol featuring erector spinae plane block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold-standard treatment for large and complex renal stones. Though associated with higher stone-free rates compared to other minimally invasive stone procedures, this comes at the expense of increased morbidity including postoperative pain and discomfort. We describe our enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for PCNL with emphasis on the use of erector spinae plane blocks to improve patient satisfaction and reduce postoperative opioid use and bother.

Post-operative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy- clinical correlates

OBJECTIVES

Management of postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is a significant goal. We sought to identify risk factors and clinical correlates of postoperative pain in order to improve perioperative management and patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center, retrospective analysis, from a prospectively maintained database, of all consecutive patients who underwent PCNL for renal calculi between January 2011 and August 2018. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and analgesic use. We considered VAS score above 4 as meaningful. Pain management was standardized according to patirnt reported VAS scores. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors and clinical correlates.

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients were analyzed. Younger age was associated with VAS above 4 on the operative day and the first postoperative following PCNL (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Female gender was associated with VAS above 4 in the first 2 days following the operation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Younger age and female gender would most likely benefit from pre-emptive improved pain management protocols following PCNL.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position with less than 24-hour hospital stay; a single-center experience

Objectives

To report our initial experience of day care percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with early hospital discharge within less than 24 hours of the procedure.

Patients and Methods

The files of patients treated with PCNL between 1st January 2020 till 31st December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Day care PCNL was defined as the discharge of patients either on the same day or within 24 hours after surgery. Patient age, ASA score, body mass index, stone diameter, laterality, stone burden, Hounsfield unit, and Guy's score were analyzed. Operative time, size of the access tract, method of lithotripsy, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were also recorded. Postoperative complications were stratified according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. The primary outcome was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of early discharge within 24 hours after PCNL compared to the in-patients who were kept in hospital for at least 2 days after surgery.

Results

A total of 85 patients underwent PCNL at our center of whom 36 patients were discharged within 24 hours (day care PCNL) of the procedure and 49 patients were kept for at least 2 days (in-patient PCNL). In the day care group, median stone burden was 465 mm2 (360-980) and 18 patients (50%) had Guy's stone score ≥ III. The median tract size was 24 (13-30) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was performed in 7 cases in the day care group. Tubeless PCNL was carried out in 88.8% of the day care surgery group compared to 37.5% in the in-patient group (p < 0.0001). The postoperative complication rate was comparable between both groups (13.8% vs 22.4% for day care vs in-patient group, respectively, p = 0.08).

Conclusions

Day care PCNL is feasible and safe for selected patients including those having large stone burden without increasing the risk of complications or readmission rate.

Role, Cost, and Availably of Urinary pH Monitoring for Kidney Stone Disease-A Systematic Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urinary pH is an important factor related to renal stone disease, and it plays an essential role in stone prevention. Monitoring of urinary pH by patients at home provides information that can help to assess the treatment needed by each patient. We conducted a systematic review is to assess the available evidence concerning urinary pH monitoring methods along with their accuracy, cost, and usefulness by patients with urolithiasis.

RECENT FINDINGS

A total of 9 articles were included (1886 urinary pH measurements). They reported information about urinary dipsticks, portable electronic pH meters and electronic strip readers, amongst other methods. Accuracy was compared with a laboratory pH meter (gold standard). Urinary dipsticks were found to be not accurate enough to guide clinical decision making and portable electronic pH meters showed promising results. Urinary dipsticks are neither precise nor accurate enough. Portable electronic pH meters seem to be more accurate, easy to use, and cost-effective. They are a reliable source for patients to use at home in order to prevent future episodes of nephrolithiasis.

Efficacy and safety of various endosurgical procedures for management of large renal stone: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials

Urolithiasis is the most common benign urological health condition. It has contributed sizeable burden of morbidity, disability, and medical health expenditure worldwide. There is limited high level of evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatment options of large renal stones. This network meta-analysis has examined the effectiveness and safety of various large renal stone management strategies. Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) study design was employed to summarize comparative randomized controlled trials on humans with a diagnosis of renal stone larger than or equal to 2 cm in size. Our searching strategy was based on the Population, Interventions, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS) approach. Medline via PubMed, Embase, Google scholar, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 2023 to find eligible articles. Data extraction, screening, selection and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. We found ten randomised control trials which consists 2917 patients, nine of them were labeled as low risk and one article was high risk. This network meta-analysis found that SFR was 86% (95% CI 84-88%) for Mini-PCNL, 86% (95% CI 84-88%) for standard PCNL, 79% (95% CI:73-86%) for RIRS, and 67% (95%CI:49-81 for staged URS for management of large renal stone. Overall complication rate was 32% (95% CI 27-38%) for standard PCNL, 16% (95% CI 12-21%) for Mini-PCNL, and 11% (95% CI 7-16%) for RIRS. Mini-PCNL (RR = 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.27) and PCNL (RR = 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.27)) were statistically associated with a higher SFR compared to RIRS. The pooled mean hospital stays were 1.56 days (95% CI 0.93-2.19) for RIRS, 2.96 days (95% CI 1.78-4.14) for Mini-PCNL, 3.9 days (95% CI 2.9-4.83) for standard PCNL, and 3.66 (95% CI 1.13-6.2) for staged URS. Mini-PCNL and standard PCNL were the most effective treatment options with significant morbidity and length of hospital stay, while RIRS was the safest management option with acceptable SFR, low morbidity, and short hospital stay.

Analysis of Nephrolithiasis Treatment in Highest Reference Hospital-Occurrence of Acromegaly in the Study Group

BACKGROUND

Urolithiasis is one of the most common diseases of the urinary system, the incidence of which is assumed to be up to 100,000 cases per million (10% of the population). The cause of it is dysregulation of renal urine excretion. Acromegaly is a very rare endocrine disorder that causes a somatotropic pituitary adenoma producing higher amounts of growth hormone. It occurs approximately in 80 cases per million (about 0.008% of the population). One of the acromegaly complications may be urolithiasis.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory results of 2289 patients hospitalized for nephrolithiasis in the highest reference hospital were retrospectively analyzed, distinguishing a subgroup of patients with acromegaly. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the prevalence of the disease in the analyzed subgroup with the epidemiological results available in up-to-date literature.

RESULTS

The distribution of nephrolithiasis treatment was definitely in favor of non-invasive and minimally invasive treatment. The methods used were as follows: ESWL (61.82%), USRL (30.62%), RIRS (4.15%), PCNL (3.1%), and pyelolithotomy (0.31%). Such a distribution limited the potential complications of the procedures while maintaining the high effectiveness of the treatment. Among two thousand two hundred and eighty-nine patients with urolithiasis, two were diagnosed with acromegaly before the nephrological and urological treatment, and seven were diagnosed de novo. Patients with acromegaly required a higher percentage of open surgeries (including nephrectomy) and also had a higher rate of kidney stones recurrence. The concentration of IGF-1 in patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly was similar to those treated with somatostatin analogs (SSA) due to incomplete transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the population of patients with urolithiasis requiring hospitalization and interventional treatment compared to the general population, the prevalence of acromegaly was almost 50-fold higher (p = 0.025). Acromegaly itself increases the risk of urolithiasis.

Endovascular management of post PCNL vascular injuries

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a gold standard treatment of large kidney stones, vascular injuries like pseudoaneurysm (PA) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) may occur due to renal punctures. These endovascular complications need urgent intervention to be diagnosed and managed early. In this case series, 14 patients who had hematuria after PCNL were managed by using angiography to identify the vascular pathology. Among them, we identified 10 patients with PA and 4 patients with AVF, 1 patient with both subscapular hematoma and PA. Angiographic embolization was done successfully in all patients. Based on our results, in cases with peripheral parenchymal damage, PA was common and in cases with hilar damage, AVF was common. No other complication and rebleeding was detected after embolization. Based on our study, angiography can be used as a safe and effective method to detect and treat vascular injuries immediately and successfully.

Ultrasound-Only Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is Safe and Effective Compared to Fluoroscopy-Directed Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Introduction: Outcomes after ultrasound-only percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), in which no fluoroscopy is used, are not well known. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of ultrasound-only and fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter database were reviewed for all patients who underwent PCNL at one academic center from 2015 to 2021. Primary outcomes were complications and stone-free rates (no residual fragments ≥3 mm). Results: Of the 141 patients who underwent ultrasound-only PCNL and 147 who underwent fluoroscopy-directed PCNL, there was no difference in complication rates (15% vs 16%, p = 0.87) or stone-free status (71% vs 65%, p = 0.72), respectively. After adjusting for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score, ultrasound-only PCNL was not associated with any increased odds of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-1.6, p = 0.41) or residual stone fragments ≥3 mm (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-1.9, p = 0.972) compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Ultrasound-only PCNL was associated with shorter operative time (median 99.5 vs 126 minutes, p < 0.001), and the use of ultrasound remained a significant predictor of short operative time (<100 minutes) after controlling for supine positioning, stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.29, p = 0.048). Patients in the ultrasound-only group were spared a mean radiation exposure dose of 10 mGy per procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasound-only PCNL is safe and achieves similar stone-free rates compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL with the added benefit of avoidance of radiation.

Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment for 1-2 cm sized lower pole of renal stone: network meta-analysis of randomized control trials

The management of medium-sized (1-2 cm) lower poles renal stone has been a contentious topic for endourologists. There are limited evidences to answer the best management options for medium-sized lower pole renal stone. This network meta-analysis provided high-level evidences on efficacy and safety of profile of PCNL, Mini-PCNL, Ultra-PCNL, RIRS, Micro-PCNL, SWL for management of medium-sized lower pole renal stone. Systemic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized control trials was conducted. The PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study) approach was used to look for relevant studies. Searches were conducted at major electronic databases like Medline via PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov to find relevant articles from the inception to April 19, 2023. Fourteen randomized control trials involving 2194 patients were among these studies that met the eligibility criteria. Pooled SFR was Mini-PNCL 98% (95% CI 96-99%), Ultara-PCNL 96% (95% CI 93-98%), RIRS 90% (95% CI 88-92%), PCNL 88% (95% CI 85-92%), Micro-PCNL 77% (61-88%) and SWL 69% (95% CI 65-74%). Mini-PCNL provided a statistically significant higher SFR compared to RIRS (RR = 2.43 91.52; 3.89)), Micro-PCNL (RR = 3.19 (1.09; 9.38)), and SWL (RR = 6.17 (3.65; 10.44)), but there was no statistical significance with standard PCNL (RR = 1.06 (0.52; 2.16)) and Ultra-PCNL (RR = 1.37 (0.75; 2.51)) for management of medium-sized lower pole renal stone. The order of SUCRA values for complication rate was as follows: PCNL(90%), Micro-PCNL(70%), Mini-PCNL(50%), Ultra-PCNL(50%), RIRS(40%), and SWL(10%). The current pooled evidence from fourteen randomized control trials revealed that Mini-PCNL, Ultra-PCNL, and standard PCNL are likely the best treatments for medium-sized lower poles when SFR over a short period of minimal session is a priority. These treatment options have a higher rate of complications, longer hospital stays, and acceptable operations time. RIRS and SWL treatment have acceptable efficacy stone-free rate with low complication rate, short hospital stays, and operation time. These treatment option would be the best fit for solitary kidney, coagulopathy, and comorbidity.

Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones - Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small renal stones in the lower pole are often difficult to treat. The angle of the lower pole to the renal pelvis (lower pole angle) is a limiting factor to rendering the patient stone free. This review explores the definitions of the lower pole angle, the various treatment options available, and how outcomes are influenced by the angle.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is clear the lower pole angle definition varies widely depending on described technique and imaging modality. However, it is clear that outcomes are worse with a steeper angle, especially for shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has similar reported outcomes to RIRS, and there is limited evidence it may be superior for steeper angles over RIRS. Lower pole stones can be technically challenging and adequate assessment prior to choosing operative approach is key.

Massive haemothorax from percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Massive haemothorax can occur following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), which is a significant adverse event and a life-threatening condition.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 65-year-old male who presented with a full right staghorn stone was treated with PCNL. Two days later, he developed massive haemothorax and conservative management with intercostal drainage failed. The patient successfully underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical decortication (VATSD).

DISCUSSION

PCNL is the mainstay procedure for complex renal stones. Because it is aggressive, it can also have serious complications. Tube thoracostomy drainage is the initial approach for managing haemothorax. However, retained haemothorax still occurs and can cause additional complications. VATSD is frequently applied in the modern era because of its good visualization and reduced morbidity compared with conventional thoracotomy.

CONCLUSION

VATSD is a safe and effective surgical technique that can be easily applied to manage retained haemothorax as a result of PCNL.

Selection and Outcomes for Dissolution Therapy in Uric Acid Stones: A Systematic Review of Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of uric acid (UA) urolithiasis contributes significantly to global disease burden, due to high rates of recurrence and diagnostic challenges. Dissolution therapy plays a valuable role in the conservative management of UA calculi, reducing the requirement for surgical intervention. This review summarises the existing evidence for the efficacy of medical dissolution of uric acid urolithiasis.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic search was conducted of worldwide literature according to PRISMA methodology and Cochrane standards for systematic review. Studies were included if they reported outcome data for the administration of medical therapy for the dissolution of UA calculi. A total of 1075 patients were included in the systematic review. Complete or partial dissolution of UA calculi was observed in 80.5% of patients (865/1075 patients), with 61.7% (647/1048 patients) achieving complete dissolution and 19.8% (207/1048 patients) achieving partial dissolution. A discontinuation rate of 10.2% (110/1075 patients) was noted, and 15.7% (169/1075 patients) required surgical intervention. Dissolution therapy is a safe and effective method of conservatively managing uric acid stones in the short term. Despite the significant disease burden of UA calculi, current guidelines are limited by deficiencies in the existing body of research. Further research should be undertaken to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of UA urolithiasis.

Outcomes of Paediatric Cystine Stone Management: Results of a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We wanted to analyse the outcomes of surgical (SWL, URS, PCNL) and medical management of cystine stones in the paediatric population in terms of stone-free status and complication rates, based on all the available literature evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review of literature was performed for all studies with paediatric cystine stone management. Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria, of which 4 analysed outcomes of SWL, 2 of URS and 3 of PCNL and 3 focused on the effect of either alkalising agents (potassium citrate, citric acid) or cysteine-binding thiol (CBT) agents (tiopronin, penicillamine). The reported SFR in studies ranged from 50 to 83%, 59 to 100% and 63 to 80.6%, with a complication rate of 2.8-51%, 14-27% and 12.9-15.4% with SWL, URS and PCNL, respectively. Paediatric cystine stones treatment should aim at complete stone clearance, preservation of renal function and prevention of further recurrences. SWL achieves inferior results in case of cystine stones. URS and PCNL are safe and effective procedures in the paediatric population, with a low rate of major complications. Adherence to medical prevention therapies may prolong recurrence-free periods.

Single-Center Experience with Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy for Kidney Stones

INTRODUCTION

PCNL remains the gold standard for larger kidney stones. Reducing the operating time of PCNL and its complication rate seems to be the next logical step in optimizing this classical technique. To achieve these objectives, some new methods of lithotripsy emerge. We present the data of a single, high-volume, academic center with combined ultrasonic and ballistic lithotripsy in PCNL using the Swiss LithoClast^® Trilogy device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a prospective, randomized study including patients who underwent PCNL or miniPerc with lithotripsy using the new EMS Lithoclast Trilogy or EMS Lithoclast Master. The procedure was carried out with all patients in prone position, by the same surgeon. The working channel size was 24 Fr-15.9 Fr. We evaluated the stones' features, operative time, fragmentation time, complications, stone clearance rate and stone-free rate.

RESULTS

Our study included 59 patients, 38 females and 31 males, of an average age of 54.5 years old. The Trilogy group included 28 patients and the comparator included 31 patients. Urine culture was positive in seven cases which required seven days of antibiotics. The mean stone diameter was 35.6 mm with a mean Hounsfield unit (HU) of 710.1. The average number of stones was 2.08 (6 complete staghorn stones and 12 partial staghorn stones). A total of 13 patients presented a JJ stent (46.4%). We found a very significant difference in all the parameters favoring the Trilogy device. The most important result in our opinion is the probe active time, which was almost six times shorter in the Trilogy group. The stone clearance rate was about double in the Trilogy group, leading to shorter overall and intra-renal operating times. The overall complication rate was 17.9% in the Trilogy group and 23% in the Lithoclast Master group. The mean hemoglobin drop was 2.1 g/dL with a mean creatinine rise of 0.26 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Swiss LithoClast^® Trilogy, a device combining ultrasonic and ballistic energy, is a safe and efficient method of lithotripsy for PCNL, proving statistically significant benefits over its predecesor. It can achieve the goal of reducing complication rates and operative times for PCNL.

The feasibility of ultrasound-guided mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ESWL-resistant lower calyx renal stones of up to two centimeters: a single center experience

Lower pole renal stones present a significant challenge in urologic practice due to difficulty in accessing the calyx and eliminating fragments. Management options for these stones include watchful waiting for asymptomatic stones, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Mini-PCNL is a newer modification of conventional PCNL. The study aimed to assess the feasibility of mini-PCNL in treating lower pole renal stones equal to or less than 20mm that were not responsive to ESWL therapy. We included 42 patients (24 male and 18 female) with a mean age of 40±2.3 who underwent mini-PCNL at a single urology center between June 2020 and July 2022 and assessed operative and postoperative outcomes. The mean total operative time was 47±3.11 minutes, ranging from 40 to 60 minutes. The stone-free rate was 90%, and the overall complication rate was 26%, which included minor bleeding (5%), hematuria (7%), pain (12%), and fever (2%). The mean hospital stay was 80±3.34 hours (3-4 days). Our findings suggest that mini-PCNL is an effective treatment option for lower pole renal stones that are not responsive to ESWL therapy. The immediate stone-free rate was high, with minimum non-serious complications.

Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: meta-analysis of clinical studies

OBJECTIVE

To compare and assess the clinical outcomes between thulium fibre laser (TFL) and holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser endoscopic lithotripsy of urolithiasis through a meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in May 2022, grey literature search in July 2022. Comparative clinical studies were evaluated according to Cochrane recommendations. Assessed outcomes include the stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, operative time (OT), laser utilisation time (LUT), ablation rate (stone volume/laser time), ablation efficiency (energy use/stone volume), total energy usage, degree of retropulsion, and hospital stay. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) were extrapolated. Subgroup analyses, heterogeneity, publication bias, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment were performed. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration: CRD42022300788.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies with 1698 cases were included in this review. The outcome of SFR showed no significant between-group difference (RR 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.20). However, subgroup analysis of TFL vs Ho:YAG with no pulse modulation showed a SFR favouring TFL (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23). The composite postoperative complication rate was comparable between the two intervention groups (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.66-1.43). OT, LUT and ablation rate were significantly better for TFL than Ho:YAG (SMD -1.19, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.52; SMD -1.67, 95% CI -2.62 to -0.72; SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.15-1.03; respectively). The degree of retropulsion was significantly lower for TFL than Ho:YAG without pulse modulation (SMD -1.23, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.71). Ablation efficiency, total energy usage, and hospital stay were all comparable. Based on GRADE criteria, the evidence certainty was determined to be very low.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there was no between-group difference for the SFR. However, compared to Ho:YAG with no pulse modulation, TFL rendered a better SFR. Shorter OT and LUT, a lesser degree of retropulsion, and a better ablation rate were noted in favour of the TFL. There was no overall between-group difference for composite postoperative complication rate, ablation efficiency, total energy usage, and hospital stay. Currently, the available clinical evidence was assessed to be of very low certainty.

Endourologic Procedures of the Upper Urinary Tract and the Effects on Intrarenal Pressure and Temperature

Introduction: Endourologic procedures, including ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), are associated with an elevation in intrarenal pressures (IRPs) and irrigation temperatures. Recent research has focused on methods to reduce IRP and irrigation temperatures, with the ultimate goal to limit the consequences associated with these deviations. The purpose of our study is to provide a narrative review on the effects of endourologic procedures on pressure and temperature and provide recommendations to minimize these changes. Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed. The search was limited to English human and nonhuman studies. Abstracts were reviewed for inclusion in our narrative review. Results: Human and animal models suggest that URS and PCNL are associated with peak IRPs above a "safe" threshold. Strategies to minimize pressures focus on minimizing irrigation flow into the upper tract and maximizing flow out of the system. High IRP has been associated with postoperative pain and infectious complications. Elevated irrigation temperatures are associated with high-power lasers during URS. Strategies to minimize irrigation temperatures focus on maximizing irrigation flow during laser activation and minimizing thermal energies associated with lithotripsy. Conclusions: Rises in pressure and irrigation temperatures associated with endourologic procedures are becoming increasingly recognized in the urologic community. Human studies examining "safe" thresholds for IRP and irrigation temperatures are limited. Temperature- and pressure-sensing technologies will aid in identifying the clinical consequences of elevated IRPs and irrigation temperatures, resulting in strategies to minimize them.