Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia® prosthesis: A series of 156 cases

Five-to-8-year prospective follow-up of 61 Touch® trapeziometacarpal prostheses

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the first patients who received a dual-mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis in our centre, for first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis, with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients received a total trapeziometacarpal ball-and-socket arthroplasty with the Touch® prosthesis for severe arthritis and one for significant laxity. Four patients underwent bilateral surgery. One was lost of follow-up and three died during the study. Function was assessed before surgery and at one, 3, 5 and 10-years follow-up visits. Visual analog scale for pain, active thumb range of motion, including Kapandji's score, key-pinch grip strength and patients' satisfaction outcomes were recorded by an independent observer. Standardized radiographs were obtained to assess osteolysis, loosening, and subsidence.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for an average of 6.5 years (5-8.8). Pain decreased from 7.3 to 0.4, range of motion increased, and key grip strength improved from 67% to 102% of the contralateral side. Metacarpophalangeal hyperextension was present in 26 thumbs (46%) before surgery (5 severe, more than 30°), and in 19 thumbs (33%) at follow-up. Z-deformity was reported in 13 cases (23%) preoperatively and in 2 cases (4%) postoperatively. At maximum follow-up, radiographs showed minor osteolysis in 4 cases (7%) around the trapezium component and in 7 cases (12%) around the metacarpal component. One revision (2%) was required for cup loosening 7 years after surgery. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study of 61 Touch® dual mobility prostheses confirms that this implant is a safe and effective treatment option for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in the short and medium term. Continued follow-up is necessary to assess the long-term outcomes of this arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: A review of the current literature

Osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint is a common condition affecting up to 70% of the general population, with symptomatic disease occurring in 6% of cases, predominantly in postmenopausal women. Among the therapeutic options, total prosthetic replacement of the trapeziometacarpal joint is gaining prominence. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update on dual mobility total arthroplasty of the trapeziometacarpal joint. PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE were searched for relevant publications that addressed the outcomes of dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prostheses. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the risk of bias. The effect model (EM) was calculated using the Cohen's d index. Ten studies with a total of 931 patients were included. Two prosthetic models were implanted (Moovis and Touch). Of the 931 implants, 25 failed (2.7%) and required surgical revision. The pooled random EM was 34.15 (95% CI, 23.53;44.77, I2 = 99%) for QuickDASH, -2.36 (95% CI, -4.24; -0.47, I2 = 99%) for Kapandji score, -7.49 (95% CI, -8.94; -6.04, I2 = 82%) for grip strenght, and -2.43 (95% CI, -2.92; -1.94, I2 = 91%) for key-pinch strenght. Dual mobility provides a good functional outcome in terms of range of motion and early recovery of pinch and grip strength, with a lower rate of dislocation compared to standard surgical procedures, and should be considered in patients with advanced trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with moderate functional demands.

3D-printed prosthesis for traumatic trapezium bone defect: a case report

This case report describes a two-stage surgical approach for managing a traumatic defect of the left trapezium bone. A 51-year-old male presented following a high-impact injury caused by a heavy iron object striking his left wrist. The patient reported severe wrist pain and restricted thumb motion. The patient sustained a severe wrist injury resulting in extensive bone loss. Initial treatment involved debridement and bone cement filling, followed by a second-stage implantation of a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium prosthesis. At 24-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated excellent thumb functionality and significant clinical improvement. This case illustrates the successful use of a 3D-printed trapezium prosthesis to treat a complex comminuted fracture with bone defect. This method offers a promising alternative for managing severe carpal fractures.

Trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty, with or without supervised hand rehabilitation: A quasi-experimental trial

Introduction

Aim of this study was to determine whether postoperative supervised rehabilitation improves functional outcomes after trapeziometacarpal (TMC) total joint arthroplasty (TJA), compared to education alone.

Method

A quasi-experimental before-after trial included 31 women (≥40 years) per group diagnosed with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis who underwent TJA. A cohort (n = 31) who was given education alone was compared to a cohort (n = 31) who were subjected to supervised rehabilitation. Primary outcome was the difference in hand function 3 months postoperatively, measured by the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ). Other outcomes were the MHOQ subscale scores, the active range of motion, strength, time to return to work, satisfaction and complications.

Results

Patients in the education group had a significantly higher median delta MHOQ score when compared to the rehabilitation group at 3 months; 28.5 (20.5-31.3) versus 15.8 (1.9-21.1), (p = <0.01) and at 12 months 36.6 (26.8 - 47.2) versus 27.4 (14.5 - 33.0), (p = 0.01). Only the secondary outcomes the MHOQ subscales hand function, ADL and satisfaction revealed significant differences in favor of the education group. The education method reduced the median number of hand therapy sessions with eight visits.

Conclusion

The present study does not show a significant or clinically relevant benefit from supervised rehabilitation in terms of functional outcomes following TJA compared to education alone. Based on this, it seems safe to leave patients unsupervised in their recovery following TJA and to suffice with just education, however further exploration of effectiveness and safety of this intervention is recommend in larger trials.

Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty

Complications of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty are uncommon, but are classified as intra- and post-operative, dislocation and loosening being the main causes of revision surgery. Periprosthetic fracture and ossification are rare. Whenever possible, prosthetic revision techniques consist in partial or total replacement with modular implants. Trapeziectomy-ligamentoplasty is the last-resort revision technique, with results similar to those of primary trapeziectomy-ligamentoplasty.

Dual-mobility thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty. Keypoints of surgical procedure for a satisfying outcome

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis is a prevalent pathology, particularly among elderly women, with a significant impact on patients' quality of daily life. Total joint replacement can provide a shorter rehabilitation period and satisfying function, at least in the short term with encouraging findings according to recent studies concerning its complications (e.g., dislocation, loosening) and longevity. TOUCH® is a second-generation, dual mobility prosthesis with promising results. Step-by-step surgical technique and keypoints for successful implantation and satisfying thumb function are presented in this article.

Immobilization, rehabilitation and complications classification after thumb trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty. A scoping review

The best way of immobilization as well as effectiveness of rehabilitation for trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty is unknown. We aimed to identify and describe the available evidence, practice variation and knowledge gaps. The literature was searched without restrictions. 123 studies were included, reporting 21 types of prosthesis. Reported immobilization types were cast (23%), splint (18%), compression bandage (10%), or combinations (26%). In 19%, immobilization time and type was not reported. Supervised rehabilitation (22%), self-rehabilitation (11%), functional use (11%), or customized rehabilitation (16%) were the rehabilitation forms reported. In 28% rehabilitation type was not described. Two (2%) studies used complication classifications, but time to complication was not described in 53 (43%). Multiple evidence gaps exist; lacking studies comparing types of immobilization protocols as well as rehabilitation regimens after trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty. Currently there is no scientific evidence for any postoperative regime. This means that decision-making is based on clinical experience rather than evidence, explaining the wide practice variation.

How a Gauze Sponge Roll Enhances Surgical Exposure in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Technical Note

Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty has become a widely used standard technique in the surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. One of the most critical steps during this procedure is proper surgical exposure of the trapezium and the base of the first metacarpal to allow for prosthesis implantation. This article introduces a surgical technique in which a roll constructed from gauze sponges tightly wrapped with medical tape facilitates several steps in thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty. While performing a dorsoradial approach to the thumb carpometacarpal joint, this cost-effective tool is perfectly tailored to the joint's unique anatomy. It aids in precise hand positioning and ensures optimal exposure of the trapezium and base of the first metacarpal, which is crucial for accurate cup and stem preparation as well as for unimpeded prosthesis implantation.

De Quervain's tendinitis after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

De Quervain's tendinitis is frequently observed after placement of a trapeziometacarpal prosthesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between De Quervain's tendinitis, osteoarthritis of the thumb and placement of a trapeziometacarpal prosthesis. The second aim was a critical analysis of the literature in search of a cause for this postoperative event after arthroplasty or trapeziectomy.

METHODS

We reviewed a series of 331 trapeziometacarpal prostheses.

RESULTS

There were no differences in thumb column length, gender, type of neck (straight or angled), or surgical approach between patients who developed De Quervain's tendinitis and those who did not. However, the frequency of De Quervain's tendinitis was much higher after arthroplasty than trapeziectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that the preoperative frequency of De Quervain's tendinitis in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is underestimated, being part of a more general pain symptomatology. More precise and specific examination is needed for a better preoperative diagnosis. Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis should be considered within a more global framework of peri-trapeziometacarpal pathology, including the trapeziometacarpal and triscaphoid levels, the articular ligaments and the abductor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis brevis, flexor pollicis longus, and flexor carpi radialis tendons.

Metal hypersensitivity in trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: A systematic pattern of progression

Metal hypersensitivity is a rare and often underestimated complication, as shown by the small number of published studies, particularly concerning the upper limbs and the hand. However, the increase in the annual number of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasties underlines the importance of better understanding of this problem. We performed a study based on data from the revision of trapeziometacarpal prostheses to assess the incidence of this complication and to define a sequence of radiological changes to detect metal hypersensitivity. This single-center retrospective study included 37 patients operated on between January 2014 and November 2023 for revision of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis. Ten (27%) had no clearly identified cause of failure. For these 10 patients, we analyzed clinical data and postoperative X-rays. In the 11 revision arthroplasties, 2 patients had no symptoms or radiographic signs suggestive of allergy. Six patients had a-posteriori diagnosis established by allergy testing, which also identified 2 additional patients, for a total of 8 patients (21% of the initial cohort). In these cases, there was systematic metaphyseal osteolysis of the first metacarpal between 15 days and 1 month after implantation. Clinically, most patients had an asymptomatic period of 2 weeks to 1 month before onset of symptoms and osteolysis, often accompanied by local inflammation. This study found a reproducible pattern of progression, characterized by the appearance of radiographic signs of osteolysis in the first month, followed by clinical deterioration. Although this course is strongly suggestive of a metal hypersensitivity, it is crucial not to exclude the possibility of an infectious cause, which should always be considered.

De Quervain tendinitis after total trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: Biomechanical evaluation of tendon excursion in the first extensor tendon compartment

De Quervain's tenosynovitis is the most common complication after total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. Etiology is unclear. Implantation of a ball-in-socket implant changes the biomechanics of the normal trapeziometacarpal saddle joint and increases its range of motion. The present study demonstrates that this procedure also significantly increases excursion of the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis tendons during thumb flexion-extension, and not during thumb abduction-adduction. Increased tendon gliding under the retinaculum of the first extensor tendon compartment could predispose to the development frictional tenosynovitis and play a role in the development of de Quervain's syndrome after total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable (laboratory study).

[Base-of-thumb osteoarthritis: aspects to be considered with the indication of trapeziectomy and CMC I prosthesis]

Base-of-thumb osteoarthritis is the most frequent osteoarthritis of the hand requiring surgical treatment, although conservative treatment options should be exhausted before surgery. If the wear process progresses with continuing pain-related loss of thumb function, thus leading to a loss of function of the whole hand, surgical treatment is indicated. In 1947, Gervis published results after trapeziectomy and heralded the development of a multitude of different surgical procedures. The long time needed for rehabilitation is a major problem of trapeziectomy with or without tendon interposition and/or suspension. After the implementation of the first CMC I prosthesis by De la Caffiniere 50 years ago, a rapid development took place, leading to the current modular bipolar implants. Especially in the German-speaking world, there is still some scepticism regarding these prostheses, which is why this review aims to illuminate both surgical procedures with a special focus placed on the aspects of indication.

[Current Trends in the Implantation of the Touch Prosthesis at the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint: Results of the 1st German-Speaking User Meeting]

The introduction of the new generation of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC I) joint implants for the treatment of CMC I osteoarthritis has significantly broadened the scope of hand surgery in recent years. However, the technical demands of the procedure and the many details that need to be considered require appropriate training and a learning curve. To share experiences with the Touch CMC I prosthesis, we held the first German-speaking CMC I joint prosthetics user meeting in Zurich. After some basic introductory lectures on biomechanics and the principles of prosthetic fitting of the CMC I joint, the various challenges associated with CMC I joint prosthetics were discussed in interactive expert panels. Subsequently, cases were discussed in small groups under expert guidance and the respective conclusions were discussed in plenary. The main results of this symposium are summarised in this manuscript.

Dislocation in Single-Mobility Versus Dual-Mobility Trapezometacarpal Joint Prostheses

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze postoperative dislocation rates in single-mobility (Ivory) versus dual-mobility (Moovis) trapezometacarpal (TMC) joint prostheses. Second, we report complications requiring additional surgery in these 2 types of prostheses.

METHODS

We retrospectively obtained data of all patients receiving a TMC joint prothesis at our hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. We recorded the type of implant used (ie, single vs dual mobility; Ivory vs Moovis), and recorded dislocations and complications requiring additional surgery.

RESULTS

We recorded significantly more prosthetic dislocations in the single-mobility (Ivory) group (n = 6, 9.7%), compared with the dual-mobility (Moovis) group (n = 1, 1.4%). The most frequent complication requiring additional surgery was De Quervain tendinitis (n = 13, 9.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a dual-mobility TMC prosthesis has significantly less postoperative dislocations compared with its single-mobility counterpart. We identity De Quervain tendinitis as the most frequent complication requiring additional surgery.

Trapeziectomy versus Maïa Prosthesis in Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Background  Osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb is the most frequent osteoarthritis of the hand. Trapeziectomy in a broad variety of surgical methods have been proposed to achieve pain reduction and improvement of thumb function. A well-known disadvantage is the long recovery time. Arthroplasty of the thumb carpometacarpal joint is a competing new method for this indication with different revision and complication rates reported. Purposes  The aim of this study is to assess whether there are significant differences in outcome during the first 12 months and time return to work after either, implant of a Maïa joint prosthesis, or trapeziectomy with tendon interposition after Weilby. Patients and Methods  This clinical follow-up study compares the efficacy of total basal joint replacement using the Maïa prosthesis with tendon interposition arthroplasty in 59 thumbs. Clinical, functional, and radiological results at preoperative, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative are presented. Results  We found a significant shorter return to work in the prosthesis group with 4.5 compared with 8.6 weeks. In addition to a significant difference in pain reduction with a better Mayo wrist score in the Maïa group after 3 months. The scores are closer after 6 months and nearly match after 12 months. Measurement of the pinch grip showed a parallel course. A radiological loosening of the cup in two patients was detected after 12 months. Conclusion  Implantation of Maïa prosthesis enables a significant shorter recovery but is associated with the risk of loosening and higher costs. Level of Evidence  Level IV, case-control study.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the ball-and-socket trapeziometacarpal prosthesis compared to trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and weakness during thumb pinch leading to disability. There is no consensus about the best surgical treatment in unresponsive cases. The treatment is associated with costs and the recovery may take up to 1 year after surgery depending on the procedure. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing ball and socket TMC prosthesis to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A randomized, blinded, parallel-group superiority clinical trial comparing trapeziectomy with abductor pollicis longus (APL) arthroplasty and prosthetic replacement with Maïa® prosthesis. Patients, 18 years old and older, with a clinical diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral TMC OA who fulfill the trial's eligibility criteria will be invited to participate. The diagnosis will be made by experienced hand surgeons based on symptoms, clinical history, physical examination, and complementary imaging tests. A total of 106 patients who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned to treatment with APL arthroplasty and prosthetic replacement with Maïa® prosthesis. The participants will complete different questionnaires including EuroQuol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), the Quick DASH, and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at baseline, at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after surgical treatment. The participants will undergo physical examination, range of motion assessment, and strength measure every appointment. The trial's primary outcome variable is the change in the visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 12 months. A long-term follow-up analysis will be performed every year for 5 years to assess chronic changes and prosthesis survival rate. The costs will be calculated from the provider's and society perspective using direct and indirect medical costs.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomized study that investigates the effectiveness and cost-utility of trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction arthroplasty and Maïa prosthesis. We expect the findings from this trial to lead to new insights into the surgical approach to TMC OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04562753. Registered on June 15, 2020.

Basal thumb arthritis surgery: complications and its management

The management of complications after surgery for basal thumb arthritis is sometimes challenging, and there are no clear recommendations on how to evaluate and manage patients with residual symptoms. The aim of the present article was to review the most common complications after surgery for basal thumb arthritis, with an emphasis on resection arthroplasty, joint replacement and joint fusion. In addition, possible management strategies for the different types of complications will be highlighted.

Influence of the anatomy of the proximal articular surface of the trapezium (PAST) and the trapezoidal articular surface of the trapezium (TRAST) in cup placement during trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty

The influence of the anatomy of the proximal articular surface of the trapezium (PAST) and the trapezoidal articular surface of the trapezium (TRAST) on cup placement during trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty was retrospectively evaluated on 56 preoperative anteroposterior radiographs of patients who underwent surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The percentage coverage of the prosthetic cup by the PAST and the available height of the trapezium were calculated. In 39% of cases, there was a significant difference (up to a mean 4.5 mm, p < 0.001) between the radial height of the trapezium (which is usually considered) and the available height of the trapezium. The anatomy of the PAST and the TRAST has an impact on the placement of the prosthetic cup when trapezium height is low. The results of the present study suggest that these considerations must be known by all operators performing trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty; that lateralization, implant suspension, or surgical alternatives should be considered to prevent several intra- and postoperative surgical complications. Level of evidence: IV.

A review of wear debris in thumb base joint implants

AIM

Polymers and metals, such as polyethylene (PE) and cobalt chrome (CoCr), are common materials used in thumb-based joint implants, also known as CMC (Carpometacarpal) arthroplasty. The purpose of this review was to investigate the reported failure modes related to wear debris from these type of materials in CMC implants. The impact of wear debris on clinical outcomes of CMC implants was also examined. Potential adverse wear conditions and inflammatory particle characteristics were also considered.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using PRISMA guidelines and 55 studies were reviewed including 49 cohort studies and 6 case studies. Of the 55 studies, 38/55 (69%) focused on metal-on-polyethylene devices, followed by metal-on-metal (35%), and metal-on-bone (4%).

RESULTS

The summarized data was used to determine the frequency of failure modes potentially related to wear debris from metals and/or polymers. The most commonly reported incidents potentially relating to debris were implant loosening (7.1%), osteolysis (1.2%) and metallosis (0.6%). Interestingly the reported mechanisms behind osteolysis and loosening greatly varied. Inflammatory reactions, while rare, were generally attributed to metallic debris from metal-on-metal devices. Mechanisms of adverse wear conditions included implant malpositioning, over-tensioning, high loading for active patients, third-body debris, and polyethylene wear-through. No specific examination of debris particle characterization was found, pointing to a gap in the literature.

CONCLUSION

This review underscores the types of failure modes associated with wear debris in CMC implants. It was found that failure rates and adverse wear conditions of CMC implants of any design are low and the exact relationship between wear debris and implant incidences, such as osteolysis and loosening remains uncertain. The authors note that further research and specific characterization is required to understand the relationship between debris and implant failure.

Failure Rate and Early Complications of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Replacement-A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Two Modern Implant Designs

Joint replacement arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb osteoarthritis is gaining popularity as recent studies have demonstrated better pinch and grip strength and faster rehabilitation. Our aim was to identify early complications in modern implant designs using a multicenter study. A total of 381 patients who underwent thumb carpometacarpal replacement surgery in six participating hospitals were enrolled. The complications included were fractures, dislocations, infections, tendon and nerve injuries, and complex regional pain syndrome. Major complications were defined as a failure to implant the prosthesis, revision surgery to remove the implant, and any other need for further surgical intervention. The secondary outcomes were any other complications treated non-surgically and the timing of the complications. Eleven procedures failed, and these patients were treated with trapeziectomies. Twelve other patients required repeat surgical interventions. Minor adverse events occurred in 25.4% of the cases, and transient irritation of the superficial radial nerve and De Quervain tendinopathy were the most prevalent complications. Although this cohort depicted the learning curves of multiple surgeons, our study demonstrated low short-term failure rates. An inability to achieve primary stability of the cup in the trapezium was the leading cause of failure. Dislocations and other major complications with modern implants were very few.

Superior bone fixation of conical compared with hemispherical trapezial cup design: an experimental radiostereometry study

PURPOSE

The most used cup designs for trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthroplasty are of hemispherical and conical geometrical shape. Using a validated pig bone model, we compared the bone fixation using radiostereometry (RSA).

METHODS

Twenty saddle-shaped pig forefoot bones were prepared with insertion of bone markers and reaming. Hemispherical Type T cups (Beznoska, Kladno, Czech Republic) (N = 10) and conical Moovis cups (Stryker, Pusignan, France) (N = 10) of 9-mm diameter were inserted press-fit. The bones were fixed in cement blocks for stability, and the cups were loaded in a motorized test stand. First, a low-pressure cyclic load test (0-150N) with 130 compression cycles was performed. Next, a push-in test of progressive loads with 50N increments (range: 150-900N) was applied until a visual change in cup position appeared. Cup migration was evaluated with RSA after every new load application. Cup failure was defined as total translation > 0.5 mm between two load applications.

RESULTS

Both cup types tolerated a compression load of 450 N without failure. Beyond this load level, the total translation cup migration of mean 0.20 mm (95% CI 0.11; 0.30) for the Type T group was higher than mean 0.10 mm (95% CI 0.06; 0.15) of the Moovis group (p = 0.046). The Hazard ratio for failure was 0.52 (95% CI 0.12; 2.17) (p = 0.37), indicating that the risk of failure was two-fold higher in the Type T group.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that conical TMC cups have superior fixation as compared to hemispherical cups above a loading level of 450 N, which correspond to a 3.8 kg tip-pinch. In a clinical perspective, based on the fixation strength of both cup types, it seems safe to allow light-load activities of daily living such as buttoning a shirt and using a key shortly after surgery and until sufficient osseointegration is achieved.

Long-term survival analysis of 191 MAÏA® prostheses for trapeziometacarpal arthritis

Surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis after failure of medical treatment remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term results of the MAÏA® trapeziometacarpal prosthesis (Lépine, Genay, France). This was a retrospective clinical and radiographic study of 191 MAÏA® trapeziometacarpal prostheses implanted between 2001 and 2016 from a single centre. The survival rate of the implants at the final follow-up of 12 years (range 17 days to 140 months) was 88%. Median pain score was 1/10. The median Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 20. The rate of major complications was 9% (5% dislocations and 4% loosening) with all dislocations needing revision surgery. The risk of prosthetic dislocation was highest during the first 3 years, most often related to malposition of the trapezium implant. The MAÏA trapeziometacarpal prosthesis represents a long-term solution for surgical treatment of thumb rhizarthrosis. Level of evidence: IV.

Total joint replacement for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: why and how?

Total joint replacement has certain advantages over other surgical treatment methods for osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint, including restoration of thumb length and alignment, good cosmetical result, fast recovery of hand function and prevention of iatrogenic complications at neighbouring joints. Disadvantages include the technical difficulty to perform this surgery and a possible higher complication rate. A meticulous surgical technique is mandatory. Combined with a cementless and modular ball-in-socket implant with a metal-on-polyethylene friction couple, a 10-year survival rate higher than 90% can be expected. Revision surgery is possible with implant exchange or conversion to trapeziectomy.

Thumb Carpometacarpal Implant Arthroplasty

Thumb carpometacarpal implant arthroplasty aims to preserve thumb length and motion and to provide pain relief and functional recovery after a short postoperative time. For several decades, implant arthroplasty has been performed with total trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis using the concept of "ball-and-socket" joint. More recently, pyrocarbon implants used as hemiarthroplasty or interposition arthroplasty have been proposed. Whatever the type of arthroplasty used, the surgical technique must be precise and may require a learning curve. Implant arthroplasty has proven that in the medium and long-term, it may be considered as a valid and reliable alternative to trapeziectomy.

Dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: a prospective study of 107 cases with a follow-up of more than 3 years

We report the results of a prospective study using a dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis (Touch®) in 107 patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. One-hundred and two patients (95%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the functional outcomes and the mean pain intensity in visual analogue scale decreased from 7.4 to 0.8 (p < 0.001). Thumb opposition (Kapandji score) index increased from an average of 8.0 to 9.4, while the mean QuickDASH score improved from 38 preoperatively to 20 at follow-up (p < 0.01). Key-pinch strength improved from 3.5 kg (range 0.5-9.5) to 5.5 kg (range 3.0-11.5). There was a 4.6% rate of complications, including cup loosening and wear of polyethylene, which required revision, but no cases of prosthetic dislocation were seen. Applying the dual mobility principle to trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty may significatively improve the stability of these prostheses. Radiolucent zones around the components of the prostheses are not systematic predictors of future loosening.Level of evidence: IV.

Revision of failed trapeziometacarpal prothesis by CMI pyrocarbon implant: Retrospective study of 28 patients with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus on the best salvage option after a failed trapeziometacarpal prothesis. Conserving the trapezium and inserting a pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty implant will prevent thumb shortening and preserve the thumb's motion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes in the medium term of trapeziometacarpal prothesis revisions done using the CMI pyrocarbon implant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 28 patients with a mean age of 63.5 years. The mean time to revision was 6.1 years after the initial arthroplasty. The dominant side was operated in 70% of patients. The surgery consisted of removing the existing prosthesis, reconstructing the trapezium with a bone graft, and inserting the CMI pyrocarbon implant. The review consisted of a functional assessment (visual analog scale for pain, QuickDASH score, patient satisfaction), physical assessment (Kapandji, grip strength, key pinch strength, tip pinch strength) and radiological assessment (complications, radiolucent lines, scaphometacarpal height, implant centering, bone remodeling).

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, no further surgical revisions were needed. The mean QuickDASH score was 1.1 and the mean QuickDASH was 13%. Twenty-five patients (89%) were satisfied with the outcome. The Kapandji score improved significantly from 7.5 to 9.5 on average. Grip strength improved significantly from 16.7kg to 21.5kg on average. The mean postoperative key pinch strength was 93% of the contralateral side. The mean postoperative tip pinch strength was 88% of the contralateral side. There were no fractures or dislocations visible on the radiographs. However, there was bone remodeling in the trapezium related to the pyrocarbon implant's indentation that was well tolerated by patients in the medium term.

CONCLUSION

For revision of failed trapeziometacarpal prothesis, inserting the CMI pyrocarbon implant combined with trapezium reconstruction appears to be a good alternative to the more commonly used trapeziectomy procedure. Reconstructing the trapezium and inserting this hemiarthroplasty implant preserves the thumb's projection, length, and stability. The functional improvement experienced by patients makes this a relevant treatment option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study without control group.

Comparison of two radiographic landmarks for centering the trapezial component in total trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty

We performed a retrospective review of standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the thumb in 80 patients, to compare two radiographic landmarks, in terms of mediolateral bone support, for centering the trapezial component in total joint arthroplasty. On anteroposterior view, we identified the distal articular surface of the trapezium and trapezium width, and defined the two midpoints as radiographic landmarks for positioning a 9-mm trapezial cup. Mean trapezium width was significantly greater than the distal articular surface of the trapezium, and the midpoints did not match. Thus, after positioning simulated 9-mm prosthetic cups centered on each landmark, the residual radial bone distance was significantly greater using the landmark based on trapezium width. The mean value was 33% greater with this landmark, and the minimum value was 2.1 mm, compared to 0.2 mm using the landmark based on the distal articular surface. Our study thus suggested that the midpoint of the trapezium width is the more relevant radiographic landmark for centering the trapezial prosthetic cup in total joint arthroplasty, by preserving better bone stock on the radial side without depleting the ulnar side. On an intraoperative anteroposterior fluoroscopic view, this landmark could be used to check cup positioning.

Thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement: a systematic review

Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis is a common and painful condition. Thumb CMCJ prosthetic replacement aims to restore thumb biomechanics and improve pain and function. Early reviews demonstrated a lack of high-quality studies, but more recently a significant number of higher-quality studies have been published. This review provides a concise and systematic overview of the evidence to date.

A systematic review of several databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the outcomes of thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement were included. Data extracted included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain scores, range of motion, strength, survival rates and complications.

A total of 56 studies met all inclusion criteria and were analysed. There was one randomized controlled trial, three prospective comparative cohort studies, five retrospective comparative cohort studies, and 47 descriptive cohort studies. The reported studies included 2731 patients with 3048 thumb total CMCJ prosthetic joint replacements. Follow up ranged from 12 months to 13.1 years.

In general, good results were demonstrated, with improvements in PROMs, pain scores and strength. Failure rates ranged from 2.6% to 19.9% depending upon implant studied. Comparative studies demonstrated promising results for replacement when compared to resection arthroplasty, with modest improvements in PROMs but at a cost of increased rates of complications.

Studies reporting outcomes in thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement are increasing in both number and quality. Failure, in terms of loosening and dislocation, remains a concern, although in the medium-term follow up for modern implants this issue appears to be lower when compared to their predecessors.

Functional outcomes also look promising compared to resection arthroplasty, but further high-quality studies utilizing a standardized resection arthroplasty technique and modern implants, together with standardized core outcome sets, will be of value.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:316-330. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200152

Outcomes of Double-Mobility Prosthesis in Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis With a Minimal 3 Years of Follow-Up: An Advantage for Implant Stability

Background: New generation of total trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis using double mobility concept has been used for several years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dislocation rate with this implant after a minimal 3 years of follow-up. Methods: From September 2013 to August 2015, 200 trapeziometacarpal prostheses were implanted in 179 patients. Clinico-radiological follow-up was performed with an average of 48.2 months (36-60 months). Survival rate and dislocation rate were analyzed. Loosening of the implants and other intercurrent events were noticed. Results: Visual analog scale, Quick-DASH, strengths and range of motion improved significantly. We report a survival rate of 97% with only 0.5% of dislocation of prosthesis at 48 months of follow-up. Intercurrent events rate were similar to the ones found in literature or other studies. Conclusions: After a minimal of 3 years of follow-up, prosthesis with double mobility seemed to bring better stability in implant for thumb prosthetic replacement.

Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

In the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) literature, there is substantial heterogeneity in outcome and outcome measure reporting. This could be rectified by a standardized core outcome set (COS). This study aimed to identify a comprehensive list of outcomes and outcome measures for thumb CMC joint OA, which represents the first step in developing a COS.

METHODS

A computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL was performed to identify randomized controlled trials, as well as observational studies involving at least 50 participants aged greater than 18 years undergoing surgery for thumb CMC joint OA. Reported outcomes and outcome measures were extracted from these trials and summarized.

RESULTS

This search yielded 3,498 unique articles, 97 of which were used for analysis. A total of 33 unique outcomes and 25 unique outcome measures were identified. The most frequently used outcomes were complications (78), postoperative pain (73), radiologic outcomes (64), and grip strength (63). Within each reported outcome, there was substantial variation in how the outcome was measured. Of the 25 unique outcome measures, 10 were validated. Of the remaining 15, 12 were created ad hoc by the author. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire was the most commonly reported outcome measure (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of consensus on critical outcomes after surgery for thumb CMC joint OA. A standardized COS created by stakeholder consensus would improve the consistency and therefore the quality of future research.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This systematic review of outcomes represents the first step in developing a core outcome set for thumb CMC joint OA.

Trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: an updated systematic review

The trapeziometacarpal prosthesis is mostly used in Europe to treat osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb. Its supposed benefits are that it restores the length of the thumb, improves strength, function and mobility while reducing recovery time compared to other surgical treatments. However, previous reviews of the literature could not confirm these assumptions. This article provides an updated systematic review to help answer to these questions through a methodical statistical analysis and to quantify the two main complications, namely failure and deep infection. To achieve these aims, a selection of articles including implant case series was done in the Medline database based on specific criteria. Data about pain, function, strength, infection, and failure were compiled and a statistical analysis was performed. Results show a fast recovery in terms of pain and function but the positive effect on strength seems limited. The failure rate represented by the revision rate is high and the deep infection rate is fairly low. Randomized controlled studies are needed to obtain reliable data to compare the prosthesis to other surgical treatments.

Arpe total joint arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: 80 thumbs in 63 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up

In this retrospective study, we report a series of 80 Arpe prostheses for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in 63 patients. Twenty-seven prostheses (20 patients) were lost to follow-up. Twenty-one were revised, eight of them during the first year after operation. The calculated cumulated implant survival rate was 85% at 10 years but could be lower due to the lack of information on the patients lost to follow-up. The number of complications due to technical errors was high; but after we had done 30 cases, the number of early revisions decreased markedly. At follow-up, 23 of 32 thumbs were totally free of pain, and the patients were satisfied with 31 thumbs. We conclude that the implant survival declines progressively in the long run, with a survival rate of 80% after 15 years of follow-up and a further decline thereafter. We also found that this surgery was difficult to master. We advise selecting this implant for thumb trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with caution. Level of evidence: IV.

Elektra prosthesis versus resection-suspension arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a long-term cohort study

The present study compares 34 patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (37 thumbs) treated with the Elektra® prosthesis, with 18 patients (18 thumbs) treated with resection-suspension arthroplasty, with an overall mean follow-up period of 13.3 years. Evaluation with disability of arm and shoulder scores, pain via visual analogue scale and range of motion (radial and palmar abduction, and opposition) indicated no significant difference. However, the cohort with a surviving prosthesis showed significantly better subjective grip strength (p  =  0.04). Complications occurred in 23 of the 37 thumbs in the prosthesis group compared with two in the resection-suspension arthroplasty patients. Seventeen prostheses required revision. At revision operations, we observed local signs of metallosis in 15 of 17 cases. The patients receiving resection-suspension arthroplasty were more satisfied with their treatment (p  =  0.003). Therefore, we cannot recommend the implantation of Elektra® prosthesis and we speculate that the key problem of aseptic cup loosening is a result of the metal-on-metal bearing. Level of evidence: III.

Trapeziometacarpal total joint replacement as an alternative to trapeziectomy depends on trapezium height: Retrospective study of 67 patients

Surgical indications for trapeziometacarpal (TMC) total joint replacement for thumb basal joint osteoarthritis (OA) are increasing. However, complications following this procedure are not insignificant. To avoid complications, preoperative planning with measurement of trapezium height is indicated to ensure a cup is not implanted in the trapezium if its height is less than 8 millimeters. The objective of our study was to analyze a series of preoperative radiographs of patients managed by trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty in our department, and to assess the possibility of a surgical alternative-total joint replacement-based on the trapezium's height. We also wanted to determine whether radiological height was influenced by the radiological progression of the thumb OA. A single-center retrospective study based on available medical records was conducted. The patients included had TMC OA refractory to conservative treatment and were managed surgically by trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty between 2012 and 2018. Sixty-seven patients were eligible. Based on the Eaton-Littler classification of radiological TMC OA, our case series had 0% (n=0) stage I, 36% (n=24) stage II, 42% (n=28) stage III and 22% (n=15) stage IV findings. We measured the radiological trapezium height on AP and lateral views as described by Kapandji. These were 10.6mm and 10.8mm for stage II, 9.6mm and 8.9mm for stage III, 8.6mm and 7.8mm for stage IV, respectively. Eighty-six percent of patients had a trapezium height suitable for total joint replacement. The radiological height decreased significantly with the OA stage. At stage IV, the average height fell below the 8-mm threshold, compromising the surgical indication for total arthroplasty.

Functional outcomes after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

There are a number of possible assessments of functional outcomes for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. The most important and easiest to measure is pain, but it is not the only material outcome. Functional scores for measuring the outcome of the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis have been recommended for some time, but are still not widely used even in published studies. It is also unclear which functional scores are the most valuable. Easily used scores, such as the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, are freely available, but may not be sensitive enough to assess outcomes especially of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty. The optimal functional outcome measurement would be weighted for the individual patient. A minimum dataset needs to be defined in order to compare studies and derive meaningful data.

Five year long term results of total joint arthroplasties in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis is a common disease. Patients with advanced disease who have failed conservative treatment have different surgical options, including total joint prosthesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome and complications of trapeziometacarpal (TMC) total arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-seven patients with TMC osteoarthritis were surgically treated with TMC arthroplasty, and one hundred and thirty-seven patients were seen for follow-up (102 women and 35 men). At follow -up patients were asked to complete a visual linearanalogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction with the result of the operation and persisting pain from the thumb, the Spanish validated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used to evaluate function of the affected hand.(9) The radiological examination consisted of posterior-anterior and oblique radiographs. In preoperative radiographs Eaton-Little was used, and in postoperative radiographs were assessed with regard to implant loosening and alignment.

RESULTS

The subjective outcome was satisfactory in 126 cases (92 %), 14 (12 %) patients would undergo the same procedure in the other hand. The DASH questionnaireswere 19.55 (range 5.6-33,5) on average, and EVA was 1 on average. The mean key pinch strength was 5.8 Kg at 5 years follow-up. The most frequent postoperative complication was De Quervain tenosynovitis (21%), other complications were: Cup loosening (3.6%), traumatic dislocation (3,6%). The prosthesis was removed in nine cases (7%). There were four intraoperative complications. The survival rate for ARPE prosthesis was 92,7% at 60,5 months. TMC total arthroplasty offers a reliable treatment alternative in patients with thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthrosis which conservatives' treatment had failed.

CONCLUSIONS

The TMC joint prosthesis is an option for patients with TCM osteoarthritis, provides satisfactory outcomes and has a low failure rate.(www.actabiomedica.it).

Failure Rates of Base of Thumb Arthritis Surgery: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current review was to estimate failure rates of trapeziometacarpal (TMC) implants and compare against failure rates of nonimplant techniques for surgical treatment of TMC joint (basal thumb joint) arthritis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify articles reporting on thumb implant arthroplasty and on nonimplant arthroplasty techniques for treatment of base of thumb arthritis in the English literature. The collected data were combined to calculate failure rates per 100 procedure-years. Failure was defined by the requirement for a secondary salvage procedure. The failure rates between different implant and nonimplant arthroplasty groups were compared directly and implants with higher than anticipated failure rates were identified.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five articles on implant arthroplasty and 33 articles on the outcome of nonimplant surgical arthroplasty of the TMC joint were included. The implant arthroplasty failure rates per 100 procedure-years were total joint replacement (2.4), hemiarthroplasty (2.5), interposition with partial trapezial resection (4.5), interposition with complete trapezial resection (1.7), and interposition with no trapezial resection (4.5). The nonimplant arthroplasty failure rates per 100 procedure-years were: trapeziectomy (0.49), joint fusion (0.52), and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction ± tendon interposition (0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Several implant designs (arthroplasties) had high rates of failure due to aseptic loosening, dislocation, and persisting pain. Furthermore, some implants had higher than anticipated failure rates than other implants within each class. Overall, the failure rates of nonimplant techniques were lower than those of implant arthroplasty.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Maïa® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: Survival and clinical outcomes at 5 years' follow-up

We sought to report the clinical and radiological outcomes and the survival of Maïa^® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty retrospectively at a mean 5 years' follow-up. We evaluated the implant survival and the clinical outcomes of 93 patients (113 prostheses). Patients were examined during a consultation and their mobility, key pinch strength and satisfaction were recorded. Patients also completed a QuickDASH evaluation. The 5-year survival rate was 92.2%. The mean QuickDASH Score was 26.7. The complication rate was 31% and the revision rate was 12.4%. The most common complication was dislocation and the most frequent cause of surgical revision was periprosthetic ossification. We identified two cases of aseptic loosening. This study shows the Maïa^® prosthesis provides satisfactory medium-term results and has an excellent 5-year survival. However, the high complication and revision rates are still a major concern.

Outcomes of cementless joint prosthesis versus tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective study

We compared 84 patients with the Ivory trapeziometacarpal prosthesis versus 62 with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis. There were 134 women and 12 men with a mean age of 60 years. Prospective clinical assessment was made using the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analogue scale for pain, range of motion, and grip and pinch strength. The mean follow-up was 4 years (range 2-5). Prosthetic replacement provided significantly better thumb abduction, adduction, pinch strength, QuickDASH, pain relief, satisfaction and a faster return to daily activities and previous work. Revision surgery was required for two patients in the prosthesis group, two for dislocation and one cup loosening, while in the ligament reconstruction group there were no revisions. We conclude that trapeziometacarpal prosthesis provides better mid-term results in terms of function compared with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition for patients with Stages 2 and 3 osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Level of evidence: II.

Can surgical guidelines minimize complications after Maïa® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with unconstrained cups?

The most important complications of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty are dislocation and component loosening. Incorrect cup position is often a contributing factor. Intra-operative guidelines to optimize cup orientation have recently been described. We evaluated the functional and radiological outcome of 50 Maïa® trapeziometacarpal prostheses that were implanted according to these guidelines. The minimum follow-up was 56 months. No constrained cups were used. Functional outcome was good to excellent. No spontaneous dislocations occurred. No radiological signs of loosening were observed. There was one case of premature wear. The survival rate was 96% (95% confidence interval 85 to 99%) at a mean of 65 months, with two prosthesie removed for posttraumatic trapezial fractures. This study shows that correct implant position can lead to reliable medium-term results after trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.