Use of an ulnar head endoprosthesis for treatment of an unstable distal ulnar resection: review of mechanics, indications, and surgical technique

Comparative Analysis of Two Hemiarthroplasty Techniques for Symptomatic Distal Radial Ulnar Joint Arthritis

Background  Hemiarthroplasty may be indicated for patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis. Recently, the use of the pyrocarbon metacarpophalangeal implant has been proposed as a novel means of treating DRUJ arthritis due to the materials improved mechanical properties and wear characteristics. Purpose  This study compares midterm outcomes of metallic and pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasties for the treatment of symptomatic DRUJ arthritis. Questions of interest included outcomes and complications. Materials and Methods  In total, 32 hemiarthroplasties, 10 metallic and 22 pyrocarbon, were performed between 2010 and 2020 by three surgeons at one tertiary medical center. Patients' retrospective outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results  Postoperatively, the metallic implant group (mean follow-up: 38 months) demonstrated decreased pain but no changes in range of motion. Comparatively, the pyrocarbon group experienced an improved range of motion and postoperative pain ( p  < 0.05). Radiographic analysis demonstrated 10% of metallic implants and 9% of pyrocarbon implants to have resulted in thinning of the lateral cortex of the radius at the final follow-up. Minor complications in metallic and pyrocarbon implant groups warranting reoperation occurred at rates of 10 and 13.5% while implant failure occurred at a rate of 30 and 18%, respectively. Discussion  Within this study, pyrocarbon implants resulted in significant functional improvement with comparable complication and failure rates to the metallic implant. Long-term stability demonstrated efficacy for both techniques in symptomatic DRUJ treatment. Type of Study/Level of Evidence  Observational Case Series IV.

Ulnar Buttress Arthroplasty without Ulnar Stump Stabilization for Giant Cell Tumor of Distal Ulna

Purpose  Reconstruction and stabilization of ulnar stump after distal ulna tumor resection is still a matter of debate. We present the outcomes of ulnar buttress arthroplasty without stabilization of the ulna stump in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) of the distal ulna. Methods  Evaluation of functional outcome was performed using Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS93) score, Modified Mayo Wrist score (MMWS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. We also assessed the hand grip strength, range of motion at the wrist, and ulnar carpal translation. Results  The study included 8 patients with Campanacci grade 3 GCTB of the distal ulna with a mean follow-up of 35.5 ± 9.1 months. The mean resection length was 7.7 ± 1.3 cm. The mean hand grip strength on the operated side was noted to be 90 ± 0.04% of the contralateral side. Mean MSTS93 score was 27.9 ± 1.25, mean MMWS was 86.9 ± 4.58%, and the mean DASH score was 4.9 ± 1.67, depicting a good to excellent functional outcome with low degree of disability. No radiocarpal instability, ulnar carpal translation, prominence, or instability of the proximal ulnar stump was noted in any patient. Conclusion  Reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint using iliac crest bone graft for ulnar buttress without stabilization of the ulnar stump after resection of the distal ulna is an effective reconstruction option with good functional outcome and preservation of good hand grip strength. Level of Evidence  Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Twenty-Year Experience With Primary Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty From a Single Institution

PURPOSE

The use of implant arthroplasty in the distal radioulnar joint is increasing. Two main types of implants are commonly used, ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) and hemi or semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. The literature consists mainly of small patient series. The purpose of this study was to examine our long-term outcomes of distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patient data were collected in a patient registry from 2000 to 2019. The follow-up included radiographic examination, physical examination, Mayo Wrist Scores, pain level, range of motion, and grip strength. Reoperations were recorded. The implants were a semi-constrained prosthesis and a metallic UHP. The mean age at surgery was 50 years. Patient demographics were similar, but the semi-constrained group had a higher preoperative percentage of instability (85 vs 52 percent). The median follow-up time was 30 months for the semi-constrained implants group and 102 months for the UHP group.

RESULTS

A total of 53 primary semi-constrained total joint arthroplasties and 102 UHPs were included. The grip strength and Mayo Wrist Score improved for both the implant groups. Pain reduced in 76% of the patients. Supination improved for the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty group. Lifting capacity was better in the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty patients. The unadjusted reoperation rate was 23% for the semi-constrained implants group and 34% for the UHP group. Twenty-two implants were bilateral; these had comparable results to unilateral implants. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated 94% survival rate for the semi-constrained implants group and 87% survival for the UHP group after 5 years. The risk factors associated with reoperation for the combined implant group included younger age at surgery, previous wrist surgery, ulnar shortening, and wrist fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty improved functional outcomes in both the implant groups, but reoperations were frequent. The semi-constrained implants group had better lifting capacity. The bilateral implants had comparable outcomes to the unilateral implants.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Outcomes following Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty in the Setting of Total or Partial Wrist Fusion

Purpose  To evaluate the functional outcome and complications following primary ulnar head or total distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty in patients who have a partial or total wrist fusion. Methods  We conducted a retrospective review of 33 primary DRUJ implants in 31 patients who had a partial or total wrist fusion. Follow-up time averaged 67 months. There were 11 partial and 22 total wrist fusions with 22 ulnar head prosthesis and 11 total DRUJ implants. The mean age of the patients was 49 years. Eighty-one percent had previous surgeries with an average number of 4.6 previous wrist procedures. Pre- and postoperative pain levels were recorded. Mayo Wrist Scores were calculated. Grip strength, range of motion (ROM), and post-operative complications were noted. Results  The pain scores improved in 67% of the patients. The Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly from a mean of 39 preoperatively to 51 postoperatively. The grip strength and pro-supination remained stable. The wrist ROM also remained stable in the patients with partial wrist fusions. During the follow-up period, 10 (30%) of the DRUJ implants were explanted, with a trend toward higher explantation rates in total wrist fusions with one in the partial fusion group and nine in the total wrist fusion group. Four of the explantations happened in the first postoperative year. Nineteen (61%) of the patients required a second surgery for a DRUJ implant-related complication; this rate was similar between the partial and total fusion groups. Conclusions  DRUJ replacement resulted in improved pain scores and Mayo wrist scores in the majority of patients; however, the combination of primary DRUJ arthroplasty and total wrist fusion was associated with high complication rates. Surgeons should be aware of the high complication rate seen with DRUJ arthroplasty when combined with total wrist fusion.

Clinical, radiological and patient-rated outcome comparison between total and partial ulnar head implants

This study aimed to analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes after ulnar head replacement and to compare partial and total ulnar head implants. Twenty-two patients with 23 implants were available with a mean follow-up time of 7 years (range 1.3 to 17) after distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. At the final follow-up, patients had a low level of pain at rest and during effort, a median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score of 12 and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score of 12 with partial ulnar head implants, and scores of 20 and 22 in total ulnar head implants, respectively. While the range of motion in patients with partial ulnar head implants was slightly reduced in comparison with the preoperative condition and to the patients with total ulnar head implants, there was a tendency to a higher grip strength and rotational torque. Both types of prosthesis showed sigmoid notch resorptions and resorptions around the neck. We conclude that the results after partial ulnar head replacement do not significantly differ from the total ulnar head implants in many aspects.Level of evidence: III.

Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Scheker Prosthesis (Aptis) Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a series of patients who underwent distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with more than a 23-month follow up. The quantitative outcome variables included the visual analog scale for pain; Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE); and Mayo wrist score. The range of motion, grip strength, torque, and lifting capacity were measured at final follow up and compared with that of the nonsurgical extremity. Complications related to the prosthesis were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (mean age 57 years) were assessed at an average 41-month follow up (23-73 months). Fifteen underwent prior hand, wrist, or elbow procedures. Four patients required 5 reoperations. The postoperative median visual analog scale pain score was 0.6 at rest and 2.1 with activity. The median postoperative DASH score was 26.7, PRWE 41, and Mayo wrist score was 65. Upon comparing the supination torque of the operative and intact sides, the operative side was found to average 87% of the intact side on a work simulator and 77% on the simulator's D-ring. Eight of 20 patients had lysis around the collar of the ulnar component (40%), as detected using radiography. Three of 21 (14%) radial plates were malpositioned, with 2 resulting in a fracture. The overall complication rate was 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty using the Scheker prosthesis demonstrated good patient pain scores and the restoration of supination strength. The collar lysis resulted in weaker supination and grip strength. Still, the patients experienced mild levels of pain and moderate disability. A moderate complication rate persisted, as reported by other authors. Accurate radial component placement is important.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Distal Radioulnar Achilles Allograft Interposition Arthroplasty: Does It Solve the Problem of Persistent Pain?

PURPOSE

Pain and instability following distal ulnar resection for distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis is a problem without a clear solution. We investigated the outcomes of DRUJ interposition arthroplasty for the management of symptomatic radioulnar convergence.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent Achilles tendon allograft interposition arthroplasty following the failure of distal ulna resection between October 2009 and January 2015. Records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, pre- and postoperative pain, range of motion, grip strength, and complications. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were evaluated for distal radioulnar instability, distal ulnar absorption, ulnar scalloping, radioulnar convergence, and allograft subluxation. Reconstructive failure was defined as the presence of moderate-to-severe persistent distal radioulnar pain, instability with radiographic evidence of radioulnar convergence or allograft subluxation on radiographs or computed tomography scans, or the need for revision arthroplasty procedure.

RESULTS

Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 49 ± 10 years. The average follow-up after interposition arthroplasty was 76 ± 23 months. The preoperative means of grip strength, arc of pronosupination, flexion, and extension were similar after surgery. The mean arc of pronosupination improved by 26.5°, and the wrist flexion-extension arc in patients without arthrodesis improved by 22.6°. The grip strength increased by 1.7 kg. Seven of 10 patients had continued symptoms of pain and instability related to symptomatic allograft subluxation and/or radioulnar convergence. Five patients underwent revision surgery; the mean time to revision was 26 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Mid- to long-term follow-up of patients after salvage allograft interposition arthroplasty of the DRUJ resulted in minimal functional improvement in terms of arc of motion and grip strength. Persistent radioulnar pain was common, with half of the patients requiring revision operations following allograft interposition. Given this high failure rate, alternative procedures should be considered for the management of chronic pain and instability of the DRUJ.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

A Comparison of Outcomes of 'Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tenodesis' versus 'No Tenodesis' after Resection of the Distal Ulna in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor

Background: One of the methods of stabilizing the stump of the ulna following resection of the distal ulna is tenodesis of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU). Some studies have recommended stabilization, whereas others have not found it useful. Most of these studies have a mix of different pathologies and often do not have a control group. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of ECU tenodesis versus no tenodesis after resection of the distal ulna in patients with grade III giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal ulna. Methods: The retrospective study included 10 patients with Campanacci grade III GCT of the distal ulna treated by resection of the distal ulna between 2014 and 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they underwent ECU tenodesis (n = 5) or no tenodesis (n = 5). The patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months for complications and outcomes using the Mayo wrist score (MWS) and the revised musculoskeletal tumor society score (MSTS). Results: The MWS and the MSTS were significantly better in the ECU tenodesis group at 6 weeks. At 6 months, MWS was similar in both groups, but MSTS continued to be significantly better in ECU tenodesis group. At 12 months, both groups reported similar MWS and MSTS. There were no recurrences in either groups. One patient in the ECU tenodesis group developed ECU tendonitis that resolved with conservative treatment. Conclusions: The outcomes of ECU tenodesis were better in the short term (6 months), although both groups reported similar outcomes at 12 months. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Arthroplasty in the hand: what works and what doesn't?

This review describes the different possibilities for arthroplasties at the proximal interphalangeal joint, thumb carpometacarpal joint, distal radioulnar joint, metacarpophalangeal joint and the wrist. For each joint, the indication for arthroplasty is explained, the surgical technique with the suitable implant is described and a brief summary of the outcomes reported in the literature is given.

Treatment Options for Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthritis: Balancing Functional Demand and Bony Resection

The distal radioulnar joint is a complex anatomic structure that allows for a combination of rotation and translation with extrinsic and intrinsic stabilizers that maintain stability through a delicate equilibrium. Traumatic, congenital, inflammatory, and degenerative processes can disturb this sensitive balance, resulting in distal radioulnar joint arthritis. We discuss the joint's anatomy and biomechanics and the clinical approach to the patient. We review the surgical treatment options, expected outcomes, and their shortcomings. Selecting the best surgical intervention often means choosing the procedure with the set of complications and limitations best suited for the specific patient.

Distal Radioulnar oint Prosthesis

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) prostheses have been available for many years and despite their superior outcomes compared to conventional DRUJ reconstructions in both short and long-term follow-ups, they have not become as popular as common hip and knee prostheses. In the current review article, at the first step, we discussed the applied anatomy and biomechanics of the DRUJ, and secondly, we classified DRUJ prostheses according to available literature, and reviewed different types of prostheses with their outcomes. Finally we proposed simple guidelines to help the surgeon to choose the appropriate DRUJ prosthesis.

Solutions for the Unstable and Arthritic Distal Radioulnar Joint

An unstable and osteoarthritic distal radioulnar joint presents with considerable functional impairment, pain, and weakness in gripping manipulation of objects. A wide variety of surgical alternatives have been described to address these concerns. Resection arthroplasties include different types of distal ulna resection and soft tissue procedures; good overall results have been described for these types of procedures, although they have shown limitations in achieving and maintaining pain relief and stability, especially in more active patients. Since the late 1980s, partial and total joint arthroplasties have emerged as good alternatives for treatment in young and more active patients.

Salvage Operation for a Failed Total Wrist Prosthesis and Darrach Procedure by Total Wrist Revision and Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty

An unstable distal ulnar stump after Darrach resection, alongside pathology of the radiocarpal joint, is difficult to manage without fusion of at least one joint. Currently, no standard 2-in-1 arthroplasty is available. We report the case of a 72-year-old woman with loosening of the radial stem of a Universal 2 total wrist prosthesis combined with radioulnar impingement after a Darrach procedure. Because of poor radial bone stock, the standard fixation technique of a semi-constrained distal radioulnar joint prosthesis (Aptis) was not possible. We present a technique to fix the semi-constrained distal radioulnar joint prosthesis as well as a total wrist prosthesis by a custom 3-dimensional printed flange prosthesis to the ulnar border of the radius. Three years after surgery, the patient remained pain-free, with 60° flexion, 75° extension, 80° pronation, and 80° supination.

Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tenodesis Versus No Stabilization After Wide Resection of Distal Ulna Giant Cell Tumors

BACKGROUND

The necessity of stabilizing the residual ulnar stump after distal ulna tumor resection remains controversial. The authors retrospectively compared the outcome of patients who underwent wide resection of distal ulna giant cell tumors (GCTs) and reconstruction with tenodesis of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) or without reconstruction.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2015, 9 patients (6 females, 3 males; mean age, 36.8 years; range, 24-65 years) who underwent distal ulna resection for GCT of bone were retrospectively reviewed. The mean resection length was 8.1 cm. Five patients had no reconstruction, whereas 4 patients had stabilization of the ulnar stump using ECU tenodesis. With a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (2-9 years), the functional outcome using the quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and grip strength; as well as the oncological outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores were more than 24 in 7 patients and 20 to 24 in 2 patients (mean, 27.6 or 92%). Quick DASH scores ranged from 0 to 27.3 (mean, 11.1). In both groups, similar scores were observed ( P > .5). No patient had instability or pain related to the stump. There was no ulnar translation or subluxation of the radiocarpal joint. Grip strength in the operated hand, controlled for handedness, was 11% less than in the contralateral hand, although there was no difference between groups ( P > .4). All patients were disease-free at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The distal ulna may be widely resected with or without stabilization of the residual ulnar stump, yielding satisfactory local disease control and functional outcome.

Unipolar ulnar head replacement for treatment of post-Darrach procedure instability

The aim of this study was to assess distal radioulnar joint stability after unipolar ulnar head replacement for post-Darrach instability. All the patients who underwent ulnar head replacement between1999 and 2015 for post-Darrach procedure instability at our clinic were reviewed. Seven Hebert-type and two uHead (SBI/Stryker) prostheses were implanted. None of the implants were cemented. We assessed stability, pain, range of motion and strength pre- and postoperatively. The changes in the radiographic appearance between immediate postoperative and the last follow-up were determined. All patients (8 patients and 9 joint replacements) had a stable distal ulnar stump at the mean follow-up of 69 months. No complications occurred and no revisions were needed. Pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) was 0 at rest and 6 during maximum effort at the last follow-up; it was 1.5 at rest and 8.5 during effort preoperatively. Wrist flexion and extension, supination and grip strength were unchanged. Pronation increased from 45° to 70°. An area of bone resorption proximal to the ulnar head implant was found in 5 cases but no secondary displacement of the implant or increased pain was reported. Ulnar head replacement stabilizes the ulnar stump. The implant acts as a spacer to place the soft tissues under tension. Distal ulnar stump instability after the Darrach procedure can be solved by a unipolar ulnar head replacement procedure.

[Endoprostheses of the distal radioulnar joint]

BACKGROUND

A stable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is mandatory for the rotation and load transmission in the forearm and wrist. Salvage procedures such as the Darrach operation, Bowers arthroplasty, and the Kapandji-Sauvé procedure include the potential risk of dynamic radioulnar instability and impingement, despite stabilizing techniques addressing the soft tissues.

PROSTHESES

In an attempt to stabilize the distal forearm mechanically following ulnar head resection, various endoprostheses have been developed to replace the ulnar head. These prostheses can be used for secondary treatment of persistent complaints and unsatisfactory results after ulnar head resection, but also in the primary treatment of osteoarthritis of the DRUJ. Based on promising results concerning improvement in pain, range of motion, and grip strength, with proper indications ulnar head prostheses should be considered as a valuable treatment option for osteoarthritis of the DRUJ.

Distal radio-ulnar implant arthroplasty: a systematic review

The use of implant arthroplasty in the hand and wrist is increasing, often with little evidence of outcomes in the literature. We therefore undertook a systematic review of the outcomes of distal radio-ulnar joint arthroplasties following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Papers were assessed for outcomes, implant survival and methodological quality. Fourteen papers assessed ulna head replacements. The implant survival rate was 93% at a mean follow-up of 45 months. One paper assessed a partial ulna head replacement. Fourteen papers assessed total distal radio-ulnar joint replacements; all but two used the Aptis prosthesis. These implants had a survival rate of 97% at a mean of 56 months. Complications rates were 28% in both groups, and many were major. Although these data are impressive, worldwide there are many more implants placed and not followed up. All studies were level IV and V studies with low Coleman scores. This systematic review demonstrates that implant arthroplasty for the distal radio-ulnar joint has produced acceptable results in small numbers of patients. Whilst these short term outcomes are encouraging, the indications should be carefully considered and there should be proper consideration of the potential for later failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Ulnar head replacement and sigmoid notch resurfacing arthroplasty with a lateral meniscal allograft: 'calamari procedure'

We report the outcomes of ulnar head replacement with concomitant resurfacing of the sigmoid notch with a lateral meniscal allograft that attempted to recreate the palmar and dorsal radioulnar ligaments in four patients. Patients' ranges of motion, grip strength, postoperative complications and radiographs were assessed. The mean follow-up was 20 (range 12-28) months. There was an increase in postoperative range of motion with an average increase in grip strength of 43% to the unaffected extremity. All patients experienced marked reduction in their postoperative pain. No patients reported symptoms of implant instability. Distal ulna implant arthroplasty with a lateral meniscal allograft gives favourable short-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Intermediate term evaluation of the Eclypse distal radio-ulnar prosthesis for rheumatoid arthritis. A report of five cases

HYPOTHESIS

Early medical management of rheumatoid arthritis with biotherapy has changed the traditional musculoskeletal damage from this disease. When the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) is involved, classic procedures may be inappropriate. We chose a hemi-arthroplasty of the DRUJ joint (Eclypse™) in patients with persistent synovitis and chondrolysis with a stable joint. The aim of this study was to assess the intermediate term results of this approach in these specific cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a retrospective study of 5 Eclypse arthropasties implanted between March 2005 and March 2011. There were 4 women and 1 man, mean age: 58.4years old (54-62) with RA that had been present for 21.6years (15-33). This hemi-arthroplasty replaced the ulnar head with a pyrocarbon component. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer for pain by VAS, range of motion, grip strength in the neutral position by Jamar dynamometer, pronation and supination strengths with a pronosupinator, DASH score and wrist X-rays.

RESULTS

One patient was lost to follow-up and the 4 others underwent a follow-up evaluation at 64 months (43-90). There were no intra-operative or postoperative complications. The pain score at the final follow-up was 1.5/10 (0-4), pronation was 70° (60-80) and supination was 80° (80-80). Grip strength was 148% compared to the contralateral side (73-200%). Pronation and supination strengths were 1.7kg (1.5-2) and 2.1kg (2-2.5) respectively. The DASH score was 55.9 points (42.6 to 79.3). X-rays did not show any changes in the ulnar notch.

CONCLUSION

This distal radio-ulnar arthroplasty is less invasive and preserves the bone and ligaments. Clinical results are rapid, remain stable over time and are well tolerated. This arthroplasty, which was initially developed for osteoarthritis and traumatic lesions of the DRUJ, is promising for specific cases of rheumatoid arthritis.

Short- to mid-term results of ulna head replacement as both a primary and revision implant

We present the results of short- to medium-term follow-up of 10 patients following ulna head replacement. The mean age of patients was 63.2 years (range 48-81 years), with the mean duration of follow-up being 48 months (12-88 months). The indications for the procedure were primary osteoarthritis (n = 3), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (n = 4), failed Darrach's procedure (n = 2) and rheumatoid arthritis (n = 1). Two patients required revision (20%), one for gross aseptic loosening of the stem and another for an initially oversized head. At final follow-up, the satisfactory rate was 90%. The mean VAS score was 2.4 (range 0-8). The average DASH score was 37 (range 0-72.5). Our study suggests that ulna head replacement can give satisfactory forearm function; however, concerns exist regarding bone resorption and tapering around the prosthesis, which may affect the long-term performance of the prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty with a Scheker Prosthesis

We report a case of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty with a Scheker prosthesis. Arthropathy of the DRUJ can occur as the result of a variety of mechanisms, including inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis, and post-traumatic arthritis. Resection of the distal ulna is often performed to relieve pain at the DRUJ. However, this can also disrupt the stability of the entire forearm, leading to convergence instability of the stump of the ulna against the radius. Several DRUJ prostheses have been developed to replace the mechanical function of the ulnar head in patients with pain related to distal ulnar resection and post-traumatic arthritis. However, most of them are designed to be used in patients with intact soft tissue and stabilizing ligaments at the DRUJ. These devices, therefore, are not appropriate for use in patients who have undergone resection of the DRUJ. The Scheker prosthesis was designed for patients who are symptomatic after ablation of the DRUJ from trauma or prior surgical resection. It uses a two plate and ball design, which has a unique appearance on post-operative radiographs.

Tendon allograft interposition for failed distal ulnar resection: 2- to 14-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the mid- to long-term outcome of distal radioulnar interposition arthroplasty using an Achilles allograft for salvage of painful instability after distal ulnar resection.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with an average age of 43 years were treated with Achilles tendon allograft interposition for failed distal ulnar resection. The average follow-up period was 79 months (range, 25-174 mo). Patients had an average of 2 previous procedures. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. At the final follow-up, pain level, satisfaction, forearm rotation, grip strength, and Mayo Modified Wrist Score were assessed.

RESULTS

All clinical parameters demonstrated statistically significant improvement at the final follow-up. Mean patient pain scores improved from 8.1 to 1.3, and patient satisfaction scores improved by an average of 6.8 points. Preoperative and postoperative forearm rotation and grip strength measurements improved by an average of 28° in pronation, 41° in supination, and 72% in grip strength. The mean Mayo Modified Wrist Score improved from 42 to 85. Postoperative radiographs showed preservation of an adequate space between the distal radius and the resected distal ulna. No postoperative infections and no foreign body reactions relating to the allograft were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Interposition arthroplasty with an Achilles allograft was an effective salvage procedure for the treatment of failed distal ulnar resection, preventing impingement of the ulnar stump on the radius. This procedure potentially provides a safe and reliable treatment, especially for patients who may not be candidates for implant arthroplasty.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Indications and early to mid-term results of ulnar head replacement

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the indications and show the early to mid-term results of ulnar head replacement for the treatment of pathological conditions of the distal radioulnar joint.

METHODS

Our study group comprised 52 patients with a mean age of 64 years who had 56 ulnar head replacements. Seven were implanted to salvage an unstable deletive procedure; the rest were for primary treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and trauma. Concomitant procedures along with the ulnar head replacement included wrist arthrodesis, joint replacement and tendon transfers.

RESULTS

The follow-up duration ranged from 1 year to 11 years (mean: 60 months, median: 60 months). In almost all of the patients, pain improved with a median visual analogue scale score of 2 (mean: 2.2, range: 0-8) and a median DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score of 12.5 (mean: 17.9, range: 0-56). Of the 52 patients, 47 reported they would have the same procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar head replacement appears to be a reliable and effective procedure solving several pathological problems of the distal radioulnar joint. We present a large patient group with a short to medium-term follow-up duration.

Resection interposition arthroplasty for failed distal ulna resections

The major complications of distal ulna resection, the Darrach procedure, are radioulnar impingement and instability. High failure rates have been reported despite published modifications of the Darrach procedure. Several surgical techniques have been developed to treat this difficult problem and to mitigate the symptoms associated with painful convergence and impingement. No technique has demonstrated clinical superiority. Recently, implant arthroplasty of the distal ulna has been endorsed as an option for the management of the symptomatic patient with a failed distal ulna resection. However, there are concerns for implant longevity, especially in young, active adults. Resection interposition arthroplasty relies on interposition of an Achilles tendon allograft between the distal radius and the resected distal ulna. Although this technique does not restore normal mechanics of the distal radioulnar joint, it can prevent painful convergence of the radius on the ulna. Achilles allograft interposition arthroplasty is a safe and highly effective alternative for failed distal ulna resections, especially for young, active patients, in whom an implant or alternative procedure may not be appropriate.

Ulnar head replacement and related biomechanics

A stable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is mandatory for the function and load transmission in the wrist and forearm. Resectional salvage procedures such as the Darrach procedure, Bowers arthroplasty, and Sauvé-Kapandji procedure include the potential risk of radioulnar instability and impingement, which can lead to pain and weakness. Soft tissue stabilizing techniques have only limited success rates in solving these problems. In an attempt to stabilize the distal forearm mechanically following ulnar head resection, various endoprostheses have been developed to replace the ulnar head. The prostheses can be used for secondary treatment of failed ulnar head resection, but they can also achieve good results in the primary treatment of osteoarthritis of the DRUJ. Our experience consists of twenty-five patients (follow-up 30 months) with DRUJ osteoarthritis who were treated with an ulnar head prosthesis, with improvement in pain, range of motion, and grip strength. An ulnar head prosthesis should be considered as a treatment option for a painful DRUJ.

Distal ulna hook plate fixation for unstable distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture

The significance of distal ulna fractures is often undermined, which can result in inadequate treatment compared with fractures of the radius, the ulna's larger counterpart. However, little guidance exists in the current literature on how to manage distal ulna head or neck fractures and intra-articular ulna head fractures. Therefore, the purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of distal ulna hook plate fixation for the treatment of an unstable distal ulna fracture associated with a distal radius fracture. Twenty-five patients with unstable distal ulna fractures who underwent stable fixation for an associated distal radius fracture were included in the study. All patients achieved satisfactory reduction and bony union. Average final motion was as follows: wrist flexion, 72° (range, 60°-85°); extension, 69° (range, 65°-80°); pronation, 77° (range, 55°-95°); supination, 82° (range, 65°-90°); ulnar deviation, 35° (range, 15°-50°); and radial deviation, 24° (range, 10°-40°). Average postoperative grip strength was 28 kg (range, 22-30 kg) and was 91% (range, 71%-100%) in the cases in which the dominant hand was injured and 80% (range, 65%-100%) in the cases in which the nondominant hand was injured. Average postoperative modified Mayo wrist score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 87 points (range, 65-100 points) and 14 points (range, 0-54 points), respectively. Chronic instability of the distal radioulnar joint was not encountered in any patient. Thus, the study demonstrated that distal ulna hook plate fixation for the treatment of unstable distal ulna fractures can achieve healing with good alignment, satisfactory function, and minimal transient morbidity.

Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the outcome of ulnar head endoprostheses in the treatment of distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 47 patients to analyze the outcome of a single ulnar head replacement over a 10-year period. All patients reported pain or instability at the distal radioulnar joint. Standardized assessments included a patient-rated pain score, forearm range of motion, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score. We examined preoperative and postoperative radiographs for final implant position, loosening, and osteolysis.

RESULTS

We observed 47 patients for a median of 56 months (minimum, 16 mo). There was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores from 4.6 to 2.2 and improvement in the mean Mayo wrist score from 14 to 69 points after surgery. There was no significant improvement in forearm rotation and wrist function. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 83% survival at 6 years. A total of 14 patients (30%) required additional surgical procedures after primary arthroplasty. Risk factors for failure included history of previous surgery, use of an extended collar, lucency greater than 2 mm around the implant stem, and pedestal formation at the tip of the implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal ulna implant arthroplasty reduces pain and improves function in patients with distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both.

Bone stresses before and after insertion of two commercially available distal ulnar implants using finite element analysis

Distal ulnar arthroplasty is becoming a popular treatment option for disorders of the distal radioulnar joint; however, few studies have investigated how load transfer in the ulna is altered after insertion of an implant. The purpose of our study was to compare bone stresses before and after insertion of two commercially available cemented distal ulnar implants: an implant with a titanium stem and an implant with a cobalt chrome stem. Appropriately sized implants of both types were inserted into eight previously validated subject-specific finite element models, which were created by using information derived from computed tomography scans. The von Mises stresses were compared at eight different regions pre- and post-implantation. The bone stresses with the titanium stem were consistently closer to the pre-implantation stresses than with the cobalt chrome stem. For the loading situation and parameters investigated, results of these models show that insertion of the E-Centrix® ulnar Head may result in less stress shielding than the SBI uHead™ stem. Future studies are required to investigate other implant design parameters and loading conditions that may affect the predicted amount of stress shielding.

INDICATIONS FOR DISTAL RADIOULNAR ARTHROPLASTY: REPORT ON THREE CLINICAL CASES

Distal radioulnar arthroplasty is an attractive solution for treating various pathological conditions of the distal radioulnar joint because it allows restoration of stability, load transmission and function. The main indications are: radioulnar impingement after partial or complete resection of the distal ulna; and degenerative, inflammatory or post-traumatic arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint. The authors present three clinical cases of distal radioulnar pathological conditions: two patients with post-traumatic sequelae and one case of distal radioulnar impingement after a Sauvé-Kapandji operation. The three cases were treated surgically with a metallic prosthesis to replace the distal ulna (First Choice - Ascension^®). The first two were treated with a resurfacing prosthesis and the last one with a modular prosthesis. All of the patients had achieved pain relief and increased movement of the distal radioulnar joint after one year of postoperative follow-up.

Allograft tendon interposition and brachioradialis tendon stability augmentation in revision surgery for failed Darrach distal ulna resections

Achilles allograft interposition is one treatment alternative for failed Darrach distal ulna resections, good results have been reported with its use but concern remains with the stability of the distal ulnar stump. The use of brachioradialis tendon passed through the radius and then divided in to 2 branches to pass over the volar and dorsal aspect of the ulnar stump with the Achilles tendon interposition, seems to represent a more reliable, secure, and biological way of restoring palmar and dorsal stability to the distal ulnar stump; while it allows a better control of the tension given to the Achilles allograft interposed than that achieved when using only suture anchors as described in the original technique.

Periprosthetic bone resorption and sigmoid notch erosion around ulnar head implants: a concern?

Metallic ulnar head implants have been proposed not only to solve symptomatic radioulnar impingement after Darrach or Sauvé-Kapandji procedures, but also to prevent such an impingement when treating arthritic distal radioulnar joint. This article prospectively analyzes a series of ulnar head implants with special reference to bone resorption at the prosthesis collar and erosion of the sigmoid notch of the distal radius at an average follow-up of 32 months (minimum 24 months).

Ulnar impaction

Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common source of ulnar-sided wrist pain. It is a degenerative condition that occurs secondary to excessive load across the ulnocarpal joint, resulting in a spectrum of pathologic changes and symptoms. It may occur in any wrist but is usually associated with positive ulnar variance, whether congenital or acquired. The diagnosis of ulnar impaction syndrome is made by clinical examination and is supported by radiographic studies. Surgery is indicated if nonoperative treatment fails. Although a number of alternatives exist, the 2 primary surgical options are ulnar-shortening osteotomy or partial resection of the distal dome of the ulna (wafer procedure). This article discusses the etiology of ulnar impaction syndrome, and its diagnosis and treatment.

Salvage of failed distal radioulnar joint reconstruction

In the patient in whom primary distal radioulnar joint surgery has failed, consideration must be given to the anatomy and biomechanics of the native joint; how this has been disrupted by injury, disease, and previous trauma; and what is required to reconstruct the joint. The forearm relies on a congruent condylar cam of the distal ulna, with intact soft tissue restraints for normal biomechanics. Surgical reconstruction using tendon graft, autologous bone graft, allograft interposition, and prosthetic reconstruction are discussed in this article. If these procedures fail, then salvage procedures including wide excision of the ulna or one-bone forearm can be performed.

Ulnar head implant arthroplasty: an intermediate term review of 1 surgeon's experience

Ulnar head arthroplasty has been an emerging alternative for salvage of resection arthroplasty at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) since the early 1990s. Recently, it has been offered for initially treating painful arthrosis or instability of the DRUJ. This follow-up study reports a surgeon's experience treating DRUJ disorders with ulnar head arthroplasty. Twenty-two wrists in 20 patients (11 females, 9 males), 6 with no prior wrist procedures were treated between 1995 and 2006 for painful DRUJ disorders with either Herbert-Martin (Martin Medizin-Technik, Tuttingen, Germany) or Avanta (Small Bone Innovations, New York, NY) head prosthesis. Follow-up averaged 54.3 months. A standardized telephone survey determined preoperative /postoperative verbal analog pain scores and a modified Mayo Wrist Score (delineating poor, fair, good, or excellent outcomes). Data suggest that ulnar head implant arthroplasty is a reasonable treatment option for DRUJ-related pain, loss of function, or salvage of failed distal ulna resection procedures. The analog pain score statistically significant decreased by 1.68 points when comparing preoperative to postoperative scores. Average Modified Mayo Wrist Scores were good, independent of whether the procedure was primary or salvaged. No significant difference was seen between the primary or salvage group modified Mayo Wrist Scores. Whereas averaged modified Mayo scores for both the primary and salvage groups were in the good category, prostheses used as primary procedures may be associated with fewer poor or fair outcomes. Two good and 1 excellent outcome of 3 wrists requiring revision procedures suggest that even with revision of the implant arthroplasty, satisfactory results may be expected.

Comparison of the native ulnar head and a partial ulnar head resurfacing implant

PURPOSE

To assess the match in size and shape between the native ulnar head and a partial ulnar head implant in cadaver specimens.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaver arms (6 male, 4 female, age range 79-91 years) with no history of previous distal radioulnar joint surgery were used. Radiographic measurements before and after implantation were used to compare ulnar head articular height, width, offset, and ulnar variance. Head diameter was measured using photographs of the resected ulnar heads.

RESULTS

The partial ulnar head implant consistently reproduced the natural anatomic size and shape for all variables except ulnar head height and ulnar variance. Head height was greater with the implant, but the additional height extended proximally into the distal radioulnar joint synovial recess, which is unlikely to have adverse affects. Ulnar variance match was technique dependent, with a tendency to place the implant in more neutral variance when positive variance was present before surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that a partial ulnar head implant, which replaces the articular surfaces, can closely re-create the ulnar head anatomy. By virtue of restoring the anatomy without an extensive dissection, the clinical results should be expected to at least match the functional results of total head replacement, reduce the rehabilitation, and possibly reduce the risk of joint instability.

Treatment of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis

Wrist involvement is common in rheumatoid arthritis and affects up to 50% of patients within the first 2 years after the onset of the disease, including bilateral involvement. It is a progressive disease that destroys the articular cartilage and surrounding soft tissues, thus leading to severe deformities. Radiological changes are characteristic and include narrowing of the joint line, cysts, and periarticular osteoporosis. Clinical changes are characterized by different scoring systems, indicating different therapeutic options. Surgical orthopedic treatment options include joint-preserving techniques to prevent further damage (radiosynoviorthesis, synovectomy, or axial correction with tendon transfers in earlier stages) and joint replacing techniques to restore function (arthrodesis, resection arthroplasty or total joint arthroplasty in later stages). This article reviews pathologic changes in the rheumatoid hand and their surgical treatment alternatives.

Distal ulnar implant arthroplasty as a definitive treatment of a recurrent giant-cell tumor

Giant-cell tumors of the distal ulna are frequently recurrent and difficult to treat. A Darrach-type resection can lead to functional impairments of the wrist and hand. A case of a 42-year-old man, who underwent a distal ulna arthroplasty for recurrent giant-cell tumor of the distal ulna, is presented. The patient had two previous operations in an attempt to curette the cavity, either alone or filled with allograft bone chips. En bloc resection and distal ulnar implant arthroplasty provided a good functional outcome without any evidence of tumor recurrence at a 2-year follow-up evaluation.

Salvage of the unstable Sauvé-Kapandji procedure: a new technique

The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure has been commonly performed in the setting of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the distal radioulnar joint. A recognized complication is instability of the proximal ulnar stump, which may occur in up to 33% of cases. Salvage of the failed Sauvé-Kapandji procedure in this setting is difficult and can sometimes involve sacrifice of forearm rotation. We report the results of 3 cases of a new salvage procedure in this setting. The radioulnar pseudarthrosis was taken down; ulnar continuity was restored with an intercalary graft; and forearm rotation was restored with matched hemiresection and interposition arthroplasty at the site of previous radioulnar fusion. Postoperatively, all patients achieved good forearm rotation (mean supination, 60 degrees; mean pronation, 65 degrees), had no symptoms of instability, and were satisfied with the results of the procedure. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores improved from preoperative mean of 55 to postoperative mean of 18.

Ulnar head replacement

Recent years have seen an increasing awareness of the anatomical and biomechanical significance of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). With this has come a more critical approach to surgical management of DRUJ disorders and a realization that all forms of "excision arthroplasty" can only restore forearm rotation at the expense of forearm stability. This, in turn, has led to renewed interest in prosthetic replacement of the ulnar head, a procedure that had previously fallen into disrepute because of material failures with early implants, in particular, the Swanson silicone ulnar head replacement. In response to these early failures, a new prosthesis was developed in the early 1990s, using materials designed to withstand the loads across the DRUJ associated with normal functional use of the upper limb. Released onto the market in 1995 (Herbert ulnar head prosthesis), clinical experience during the last 10 years has shown that this prosthesis is able to restore forearm function after ulnar head excision and that the materials (ceramic head and noncemented titanium stem), even with normal use of the limb, are showing no signs of failure in the medium to long term. As experience with the use of an ulnar head prosthesis grows, so does its acceptance as a viable and attractive alternative to more traditional operations, such as the Darrach and Sauve-Kapandji procedures. This article discusses the current indications and contraindications for ulnar head replacement and details the surgical procedure, rehabilitation, and likely outcomes.

Osteoarthritis of the wrist

Osteoarthritis of the wrist is one of the most common conditions encountered by hand surgeons. It may result from a nonunited or malunited fracture of the scaphoid or distal radius; disruption of the intercarpal, radiocarpal, radioulnar, or ulnocarpal ligaments; avascular necrosis of the carpus; or a developmental abnormality. Whatever the cause, subsequent abnormal joint loading produces a spectrum of symptoms, from mild swelling to considerable pain and limitations of motion as the involved joints degenerate. A meticulous clinical and radiographic evaluation is required so that the pain-generating articulation(s) can be identified and eliminated. This article reviews common causes of wrist osteoarthritis and their surgical treatment alternatives.

Hemiarthroplasty of the distal ulna with an eccentric prosthesis

Replacement arthroplasty of the ulnar head is indicated primarily for stiffness and pain as a consequence of rheumatoid, degenerative, and posttraumatic arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint. It is also successfully used in the setting of previous failed excisional arthroplasty of the distal ulna. A distal ulnar hemiarthroplasty, which anatomically recreates the native ulnar head by employing an eccentric design, is discussed. The surgical technique includes a dorsal approach and careful repair of the soft tissue stabilizers.

Eclypse: partial ulnar head replacement for the isolated distal radio-ulnar joint arthrosis

Eclypse is a pyrocarbon spacer that has been developed to substitute the articular portion of the damaged ulnar head in patients with an isolated distal radioulnar joint degenerative arthritis. The spacer can be inserted without significantly detaching the foveal insertion of the triangular fibrocartilage and preserving intact the extensor carpi ulnaris sheath. The goal of the implant is to maintain adequate separation of the 2 forearm bones throughout the entire range of pronosupination. After surgery, the joint stability is supported by the joint physiological stabilizers such as the triangular fibrocartilage and extensor carpi ulnaris muscle. To avoid dislocation of the implant at the extremes of forearm rotation, a titanium stem is implanted into the ulnar distal metaphysis with a distal peg inserted in a cylindrical hole in the center of the spacer. The loose fitting of the peg into the spacer allows some proximodistal translation and slight axial rotation of the implant, enough to adjust its position to the always-changing space between the distal ulna and the sigmoid notch concavity. Preliminary results in 3 patients are very encouraging, with minimal discomfort at the extremes of motion and a mean pronation of 65 degrees and supination of 70 degrees. At an average 11 months' follow-up, all patients were able to lift up to 4 kg of load throughout the entire range of forearm rotation without yielding.

Arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint using a new ulnar head endoprosthesis: preliminary report

PURPOSE

To report our experience using a distal ulnar head endoprosthesis to treat painful disorders of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) secondary to (1) instability and (2) arthrosis.

METHODS

Our experience with over 2 years of follow-up study consists of 19 wrists (17 patients). All patients presented complaining of pain and functional disability of the upper limb due to convergence instability or arthrosis of the DRUJ. The patients were studied prospectively. Thirteen patients had a total of 37 previous wrist or DRUJ surgical procedures. Standardized preoperative and postoperative assessments included a patient-reported pain score, a functional satisfaction score, forearm range of motion, grip strength as a percentage of that of the opposite limb, and clinical and radiographic examinations. The Mayo Wrist Score was calculated before surgery and at the last follow-up period.

RESULTS

Overall, pain scores decreased 50%, and functional satisfaction scores improved 3-fold. Average grip strength improved by 4 kg, or 16% from preoperative measurements. Forearm rotation was unchanged. All wrists were clinically stable on the latest follow-up examination. Two failures occurred early, at 7 and 14 months. Currently, all prostheses remain clinically and radiographically stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant arthroplasty of the distal ulna combined with an adequate soft-tissue repair is recommended to improve pain, function, and strength of the wrist and forearm. Prosthetic replacement of the distal ulna restored stability to the DRUJ in patients with partial or complete excision of the ulnar head or DRUJ arthrosis and corrected radioulnar impingement. Incidences of complications or revision surgery to date have been low. Larger clinical and radiographic assessments will be needed to determine the long-term success of distal ulna prosthetic replacement.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.