1
|
Michaud J, Dutron S, Pico J, Jeandel C, Joly-Monrigal P, Neagoe P, Alkar F, Sarradin T, Domitien L, Prodhomme O, Jeziorski E, Delpont M. The feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided puncture for treatment of septic arthritis in children. Ital J Pediatr 2024; 50:198. [PMID: 39334397 PMCID: PMC11438135 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-024-01746-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In septic arthritis, joint lavage can be performed using arthrocentesis (articular needle aspiration) or arthrotomy. The use of fluoroscopy to guide the puncture involves radiation. Ultrasound (US) guidance is still little recommended to guide the treatment of septic arthritis in children. We wanted to know whether treating septic arthritis in children was feasible and safe under ultrasound (US) guidance. METHODS We retrospectively included 67 children (mean age, 3.0 years; range: 1 month-12 years) treated for septic arthritis of the hip, shoulder, or ankle using arthrocentesis or arthrotomy under US or fluoroscopic guidance (non-US group) with at least two years of follow-up. RESULTS We found no significant difference between the groups. After arthrocentesis, patients in the US group remained in hospital for 0.8 days longer than those in the non-US group, but the difference was not significant. After arthrotomy, the arthrotomy-US group required 0.4 more days of hospitalization than the non-US group, but the difference was not significant. Patients in the US group exhibited higher initial CRP and WBC values than patients treated without US, although the differences were not significant. The WBC values of the arthrocentesis-US groups were higher than those of the non-US groups initially and at 72 h, but non significantly so; they became similar on day 5. Three puncture failures required arthrotomy (two under US guidance). Three patients required early revision surgery: one had undergone arthrocentesis with US, one arthrocentesis without US, and one arthrotomy without US. At the last follow-up, there were no clinical sequelae but two hip arthrotomies (one US and one non-US child) showed asymptomatic calcifications. CONCLUSIONS US guidance is feasible and safe for treating septic arthritis in children, visualizing structures not shown by X-rays and avoiding radiation exposure during surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV (case series). TRIAL REGISTRATION IRB-MTP_2021_05_202100781.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Michaud
- Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 191 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34295, France
| | - Sarah Dutron
- Pediatric Post-Emergency Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Julien Pico
- Department of Maternal, Child and Women's Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric Anaesthesia Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Clément Jeandel
- Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 191 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34295, France
| | - Pauline Joly-Monrigal
- Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 191 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34295, France
| | - Petre Neagoe
- Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 191 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34295, France
| | - Fanny Alkar
- Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 191 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34295, France
| | - Thomas Sarradin
- Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 191 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34295, France
| | - Léa Domitien
- Pediatric Post-Emergency Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- PCCEI, CeRéMAIA, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Prodhomme
- Pediatric Radiology, Arnaud De Villeneuve Hospital, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Jeziorski
- Pediatric Post-Emergency Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- PCCEI, CeRéMAIA, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Marion Delpont
- Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 191 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34295, France.
- PhyMedExp, CNRS UMR 9214, INSERM U1046, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|