Do state supports for persons with brain injury affect outcomes in the 5 Years following acute rehabilitation?

Geographic Variation in Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether regional variations exist in functional outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) across the United States, while controlling for demographic and clinical variables.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) across 4 U.S. regions: West, Midwest, South, and East.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with open or closed TBI (Rehabilitation Impairment Codes 2.21 or 2.22) discharged from an IRF between 2016 and 2019.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis de-identified data from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. The study compared total functional independence measure (FIM) scores and discharge dispositions across the 4 regions.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcomes were FIM scores at discharge, changes in FIM scores between admission and discharge, and community discharge rates, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated to assess the clinical significance of regional differences on FIM scores. Prevalence ratios were used for discharge disposition outcomes.

RESULTS

Regional differences were identified in functional outcomes for patients with TBI. The West had the highest community discharge rate (80.9%) compared to the East (70.5%). Discharge FIM scores were significantly lower in the Midwest and East compared to the South (-1.98 and - 2.31, respectively, P < .01), while the West showed no significant difference from the South (-0.78, P = .11). Effect sizes for FIM total scores were small across regions, with Cohen's d for West versus South at 0.017, Midwest versus South at 0.047, and East versus South at 0.047. Prevalence ratios for community discharge showed minor differences: West versus South at 1.010, Midwest versus South at 0.937, and East versus South at 0.918; all without statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional disparities in functional outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation for TBI were observed, particularly in community discharge rates and total FIM scores. However, based on the effect sizes and prevalence ratios, these differences may not be clinically meaningful and could not be fully explained by demographic and clinical factors. Further studies are needed to explore region-specific factors influencing rehabilitation efficacy to improve outcomes for patients with TBI nationwide.

A Look at Traumatic Brain Injury Community Programs in British Columbia: Barriers and facilitators of implementation

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

1) Characterize the delivery of programs that support acceptance and resiliency for people with brain injury in the healthcare sector; 2) Understand the barriers and facilitators in implementation of programs to support self-acceptance and resiliency for people with brain injury.

DESIGN

Participatory focus groups were used to explore experiences of conducting brain injury programs and knowledge of the barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Focus group data were analyzed with manifest content analysis to minimally deviate from broad and structural information provided by participants.

SETTING

Four focus group sessions were conducted online through a video calling platform.

PARTICIPANTS

22 individuals from community associations conducting programs for people with brain injury. Participants were recruited from a public brain injury organization database.

RESULTS

Systemic challenges such as access to and allocation of funding require navigation support. Resource consistency and availability, including stable program leaders and a welcoming atmosphere, are important for program implementation and sustainability. Shared experiences promote connection with the community and personal development.

CONCLUSIONS

This study informs individual- and community-level approaches to promote meaningful life after brain injury. Findings highlight existing resources and support future programming for people with brain injury.

Developing multidimensional participation profiles after traumatic brain injury: a TBI model systems study

Purpose. To characterize societal participation profiles after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) along objective (Frequency) and subjective (Satisfaction, Importance, Enfranchisement) dimensions.Materials and Methods. We conducted secondary analyses of a TBI Model Systems sub-study (N = 408). Multiaxial assessment of participation included the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective and -Subjective questionnaires (Participation Frequency and Importance/Satisfaction, respectively) and the Enfranchisement Scale. Participants provided responses via telephone interview 1-15 years post-injury. Multidimensional participation profiles (classes) were extracted using latent profile analysis.Results. A 4-class solution was identified as providing maximal statistical separation between profiles and being clinically meaningful based on profile demographic features. One profile group (48.5% of the sample) exhibited the "best" participation profile (High Frequency, Satisfaction, Importance, and Enfranchisement) and was also the most advantaged according to socioeconomic indicators. Other profile groups showed appreciable heterogeneity across participation dimensions. Age, race/ethnicity, education level, ability to drive, and urbanicity were features that varied between profiles.Conclusions. Societal participation is a critical, but inherently complex, TBI outcome that may not be adequately captured by a single index. Our data underscore the importance of a multidimensional approach to participation assessment and interpretation using profiles. The use of participation profiles may promote precision health interventions for community integration.Implications for RehabilitationOur study found unidimensional measures of societal participation in traumatic brain injury (TBI) populations that focus exclusively on frequency indicators may be overly simplistic and miss key subjective components of participationTaking a multidimensional perspective, we documented four meaningfully distinct participation subgroups (including both objective and subjective dimensions of societal participation) within the TBI rehabilitation populationMultidimensional profiles of participation may be used to group individuals with TBI into target groups for intervention (e.g., deeper goal assessment for individuals who do not rate standard participation activities as important, but also do not participate and do not feel enfranchised).

The feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the multimodal, community-based LoveYourBrain Retreat program for people with traumatic brain injury and caregivers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the LoveYourBrain Retreat program using a pre-post, retrospective, concurrent triangulation mixed methods study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 5-day, multimodal, residential Retreat intervention was designed to improve quality of life among traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors and caregivers through mindfulness, movement, nutrition, art, and community-building. Eligibility included being a TBI survivor (>2 years post-injury) or caregiver, 18+ years old, independently mobile, able to communicate verbally, and a first-time participant. Self-reported quantitative and qualitative data were collected via electronic surveys pre- and post-retreat, analyzed separately, then combined. Paired t-tests assessed mean differences in scores on Quality of Life After Brain Injury Overall scale (QOLIBRI-OS) and NIH TBI/Neuro-QOL Resilience, Cognition, Positive Affect/Wellbeing, and Emotional/Behavioral Dysregulation scales. We assessed feasibility using sample characteristics and program frequency and retention, and acceptability using quality ratings. Content analysis explored perceived benefits and improvements.

RESULTS

68 People-53 with TBI and 15 caregivers-participated in one of three LoveYourBrain Retreats. Significant improvements were found in QOLIBRI-OS (6.91, 95%CI 1.88-11.94), Resilience (2.14, 95%CI 0.50-3.78), Cognition (2.81, 95%CI 0.79-4.83), and Emotional/Behavioral Dysregulation (2.84, 95%CI 0.14-5.54) among TBI survivors (n = 41). Mean satisfaction was 9.6/10 (SD = 0.64). Content analysis revealed community connection, reframing TBI experience, self-regulation, and self-care themes.

CONCLUSIONS

The LoveYourBrain Retreat is feasible, acceptable, and may be effective complementary rehabilitation to improve QOL among TBI survivors.

Traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease: insights from the United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Research Program

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health priority, associated with substantial burden. Historically conceptualised as an injury event with finite recovery, TBI is now recognised as a chronic condition that can affect multiple domains of health and function, some of which might deteriorate over time. Many people who have had a TBI remain moderately to severely disabled at 5 years, are rehospitalised up to 10 years post-injury, and have a reduced lifespan relative to the general population. Understanding TBI as a chronic disease process can be highly informative for optimising care, which has traditionally focused on acute care. Chronic brain injury care models must be informed by a holistic understanding of long-term outcomes and the factors that can affect how care needs evolve over time. The United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care follows up individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI for over 30 years, allowing characterisation of the chronic (2-30 years or more post injury) functional, cognitive, behavioural, and social sequelae experienced by individuals who have had a moderate-to-severe TBI and the implications for their health and quality of life. Older age, social determinants of health, and lower acute functional status are associated with post-recovery deterioration, while younger age and greater functional independence are associated with risky health behaviours, including substance misuse and re-injury. Systematically collected data on long-term outcomes across multiple domains of health and function are needed worldwide to inform the development of models for chronic disease management, including the proactive surveillance of commonly experienced health and functional challenges.