Prognostic factors for remission, relapse, and treatment complications in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis

Diabetes Mellitus in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis: Frequency, Risk Factors and Effect on Outcome

BACKGROUND

Treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) includes corticosteroids, which are associated with the development of diabetes mellitus (DM). Reported new-onset DM rates in patients with AIH have varied, and predisposing factors and prognostic implications are inadequately characterised.

AIM

To identify the frequency and predisposing factors for DM in AIH and its association with disease progression and mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective/prospective single-centre study of 494 patients with AIH presenting 1987-2023, 466 receiving corticosteroids (454 prednisolone, 12 budesonide) and followed for (median (range) 9 (0-36) years).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (10%) already had DM at AIH diagnosis. New-onset DM subsequently developed in another 59 (13%). In those receiving prednisolone, new-onset DM incidence was 8% ± 1% after 1 year and 14% ± 2% after 10 years (14- and 3-fold higher than expected population rate), and was independently associated with older age, non-Caucasian ethnicity, higher initial prednisolone dose, higher BMI at diagnosis and more weight gain after 2 years of follow-up. New-onset DM usually persisted despite stopping prednisolone. New-onset DM and DM at any time were independently associated with all-cause death/transplantation rate, along with previously established risk factors (older age, cirrhosis, lower ALT at diagnosis and failure of early ALT normalisation). New-onset DM and DM at any time were also independently associated with cirrhosis development. Similar associations of new-onset DM and DM at any time with liver-related death/transplantation were significant on univariate but not multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

New-onset DM occurred in 13% of patients with AIH, was related to older age, non-Caucasian ethnicity, higher prednisolone dose, higher BMI at diagnosis and weight gain; and was an independent predictor of all-cause death/transplantation and of cirrhosis development, underlining the need to minimise steroid burden in AIH.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if untreated, often leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of AIH was published in 2011. Since then, our understanding of AIH has advanced in many areas. This update to the previous guideline was commissioned by the BSG and developed by a multidisciplinary group. The aim of this guideline is to review and summarise the current evidence, in order to inform and guide diagnosis and management of patients with AIH and its variant syndromes. The main focus is on AIH in adults, but the guidelines should also be relevant to older children and adolescents.

What is the optimal first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials and comparative cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Uncertainty remains about many aspects of first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

DESIGN

Systemic review with meta-analysis (MA).

DATA SOURCES

Bespoke AIH Endnote Library, updated to 30 June 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies including adult patients with AIH, reporting death/transplantation, biochemical response (BR) and/or adverse effects (AEs).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data pooled in MA as relative risk (RR) under random effects. Risk of bias (ROB) assessed using Cochrane ROB-2 and ROBINS-1 tools.

RESULTS

From seven RCTs (five with low and two with some ROB) and 18 cohort studies (12 moderate ROB, six high for death/transplant), we found lower death/transplantation rates in (a) patients receiving pred+/-aza (vs no pred): overall (RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.74)), in patients without symptoms (0.38 (0.19-0.75)), without cirrhosis (0.30 (0.14-0.65)), and with decompensated cirrhosis (RR 0.38 (0.23-0.61)), and (b) patients receiving pred+aza (vs pred alone) (0.38 (0.22-0.65)). Patients receiving higher (vs lower) initial pred doses had similar BR rates (RR 1.07 (0.92-1.24)) and mortality (0.71 (0.25-2.05)) but more AEs (1.73 (1.17-2.55)). Patients receiving bud (vs pred) had similar BR rates (RR 0.99 (0.71-1.39)), with fewer cosmetic AEs (0.46 (0.34-0.62)). Patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs aza) had similar BR rates (RR 1.32 (0.73-2.38)) and fewer AEs requiring drug cessation (0.20 (0.09-0.43)).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality is lower in pred-treated (vs untreated) patients, overall and in several subgroups, and in those receiving pred+aza (vs pred). Higher initial pred doses confer no clear benefit and cause more AEs. Bud (vs pred) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer cosmetic AEs. MMF (vs aza) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer serious AEs.

Lack of complete biochemical response in autoimmune hepatitis leads to adverse outcome: First report of the IAIHG retrospective registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group retrospective registry (IAIHG-RR) is a web-based platform with subjects enrolled with a clinical diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). As prognostic factor studies with enough power are scarce, this study aimed to ascertain data quality and identify prognostic factors in the IAIHG-RR cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included all patients with a clinical diagnosis of AIH from the IAIHG-RR. The quality assessment consisted of external validation of completeness and consistency for 29 predefined variables. Cox regression was used to identify risk factors for liver-related death and liver transplantation (LT).

RESULTS

This analysis included 2559 patients across 7 countries. In 1700 patients, follow-up was available, with a completeness of individual data of 90% (range: 30-100). During a median follow-up period of 10 (range: 0-49) years, there were 229 deaths, of which 116 were liver-related, and 143 patients underwent LT. Non-White ethnicity (HR 4.1 95% CI: 2.3-7.1), cirrhosis (HR 3.5 95% CI: 2.3-5.5), variant syndrome with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (HR 3.1 95% CI: 1.6-6.2), and lack of complete biochemical response within 6 months (HR 5.7 95% CI: 3.4-9.6) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The IAIHG-RR represents the world's largest AIH cohort with moderate-to-good data quality and a relevant number of liver-related events. The registry is a suitable platform for patient selection in future studies. Lack of complete biochemical response to treatment, non-White ethnicity, cirrhosis, and PSC-AIH were associated with liver-related death and LT.

Is there any predictor for relapse after treatment withdrawal in autoimmune hepatitis patients in the real life?

Backgrounds and Aims

In autoimmune hepatitis, there are uncertainties about whether to discontinue the treatment, when the treatment should be discontinued, and the risks of relapse in the cases where remission is achieved with immunosuppressive therapy. In this study, patients with AIH, whose immunosuppressive treatments were discontinued, were evaluated for the rates of remission and the risk of relapse.

Materials and Methods

A total of 119 patients, who were diagnosed with AIH based on the AIHG scoring systems between 1990 and 2015, were evaluated. Patients were receiving standard azathioprine and steroid therapy. The treatment was discontinued in patients, who had been receiving treatment for at least 2 years, who had no clinical complaints, and whose aminotransferases were normal and when an increase occurred in AST values more than two times the normal after the treatment was interrupted, the case was considered as a relapse.

Results

Among the patients, 83%(n = 99) were women. When the patients were diagnosed with AIH, their mean age was 36 ± 16(8–79) years; 70.6%(n = 84) were type 1, 3.4%(n = 4) type 2, and 26%(n = 31) were autoantibody-negative AIH. At the time of discontinuation, liver biopsy was performed in 8 of the patients and minimal-mild abnormalities were detected. Patients whose treatment was discontinued received treatment for an average of 101 ± 75(range: 24–280, median: 68.5) months; and, they were followed up for an average of 19 (1–110) months during the period without medication. Relapse occurred in 67%(n = 12) of the patients with drug withdrawal. Relapse occurred within the first 12 months in 67% of these patients (n = 8) and developed with an acute hepatitis attack in 42%. None of the clinical, laboratory, and histological data were found to be effective on relapse.

Conclusion

In patients with AIH, relapse occurs in two-thirds of patients within an average of 19 month after the discontinuation of the medication. Most relapses occur at the early period and they are accompanied by an acute hepatitis attack.

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis: an overlooked interaction

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most common liver disease globally, and affects about a quarter of the general population. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe (sometimes fatal) liver disease that affects children and adults, with a rising prevalence. Thus, not surprisingly, both conditions can frequently coexist, with potential synergistic impact on the course of the disease and response to therapy of both entities.

AREAS COVERED

In this work, the authors aimed to provide a narrative updated review on this interaction, diagnosis, and management of MAFLD/AIH and the current challenges.

EXPERT OPINION

Clarifying the nature of the complex interaction between the two diseases was hampered by a myriad of factors, particularly the previous diagnosis of exclusion for fatty liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction. The recent redefinition of fatty liver disease that led to the development of positive diagnostic criteria for MAFLD has the premise to help in circumventing some of these challenges.

The Role of IL-35 in the Pathophysiological Processes of Liver Disease

It is known that liver diseases have several characteristics of massive lipid accumulation and lipid metabolic disorder, and are divided into liver inflammation, liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis (LC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients. Interleukin (IL)-35, a new-discovered cytokine, can protect the liver from the environmental attack by increasing the ratio of Tregs (T regulatory cells) which can increase the anti-inflammatory cytokines and inhibit the proliferation of immune cellular. Interestingly, two opposite mechanisms (pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory) have connection with the ultimate formation of liver diseases, which suggest that IL-35 may play crucial function in the process of liver diseases through immunosuppressive regulation. Besides, some obvious advantages also imply that IL-35 can be considered as a new therapeutic target to control the progression of liver diseases, while its mechanism of function still needs further research.