Calder AE, Hase A, Hasler G. Effects of psychoplastogens on blood levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mol Psychiatry 2025;
30:763-776. [PMID:
39613915 PMCID:
PMC11753367 DOI:
10.1038/s41380-024-02830-z]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 12/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Peripheral levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are often used as a biomarker for the rapid plasticity-promoting effects of ketamine, psychedelics, and other psychoplastogens in humans. However, studies analyzing peripheral BDNF after psychoplastogen exposure show mixed results. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to test whether the rapid upregulation of neuroplasticity seen in preclinical studies is detectable using peripheral BDNF in humans.
METHODS
This analysis was pre-registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022333096) and funded by the University of Fribourg. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO to meta-analyze the effects of all available psychoplastogens on peripheral BDNF levels in humans, including ketamine, esketamine, LSD, psilocybin, ayahuasca, DMT, MDMA, scopolamine, and rapastinel. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools. Using meta-regressions and mixed effects models, we additionally analyzed the impact of several potential moderators.
RESULTS
We included 29 studies and found no evidence that psychoplastogens elevate peripheral BDNF levels in humans (SMD = 0.024, p = 0.64). This result was not affected by drug, dose, blood fraction, participant age, or psychiatric diagnoses. In general, studies with better-controlled designs and fewer missing values reported smaller effect sizes. Later measurement timepoints showed minimally larger effects on BDNF.
CONCLUSION
These data suggest that peripheral BDNF levels do not change after psychoplastogen administration in humans. It is possible that peripheral BDNF is not an informative marker of rapid changes in neuroplasticity, or that preclinical findings on psychoplastogens and neuroplasticity may not translate to human subjects. Limitations of this analysis include the reliability and validity of BDNF measurement and low variation in some potential moderators. More precise methods of measuring rapid changes in neuroplasticity, including neuroimaging and stimulation-based methods, are recommended for future studies attempting to translate preclinical findings to humans.
Collapse