Immunomodulatory differences between mesenchymal stem cells from different oral tissues

A Review of Stem Cell Attributes Derived from the Oral Cavity

Oral cavity stem cells (OCSCs) have been the focus of intense scientific efforts due to their accessibility and stem cell properties. The present work aims to compare the different characteristics of 6 types of dental stem cells derived from the oral cavity: dental pulp stem cells (DPSC), stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED), periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSC), stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP), bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC), and gingival mesenchymal stem cells (GMSC). Using immunofluorescence and real-time polymerase chain reaction techniques, we analysed the cells for stem cell, differentiation, adhesion, and extracellular matrix markers; the ability to proliferate in vitro; and multilineage differentiation potential. Markers such as vimentin, CD44, alkaline phosphatase, CD146, CD271, CD49f, Oct 3/4, Sox 9, FGF7, nestin, and BMP4 showed significant differences in expression levels, highlighting the heterogeneity and unique characteristics of each cell type. At the same time, we confirmed that all cell types successfully differentiated into osteogenic, chondrogenic, or adipose lineages, with different readiness. In conclusion, our study reveals the distinct properties and potential applications of various dental-derived stem cells. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of OCSCs and their significance in future clinical applications.

Landscape of Differentiation Potentials as a "Hallmark" in Oral-derived MSCs

Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer clinical promise for use in cell therapy approaches for regenerative medicine. A therapeutic challenge is that MSCs from different tissues are phenotypically and functionally distinct. Therefore, this study aims to molecularly characterize oral-derived MSCs by defining one of the three hallmarks of MSCs, differentiation potential, to discern their true molecular identities.

Methods

Three different populations of oral tissue MSCs (from alveolar bone-aBMSCs; from dental pulp-DPSCs; and from gingiva-GMSCs) from three different patients were isolated and cultured. These MSCs were characterized for their stemness by flow cytometry and multi-differentiation potential, and their RNA was also isolated and analyzed quantitatively with RNA sequencing. Total mRNA-seq was performed and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in pairwise (DPSCs vs. aBMSCs, GMSCs vs. aBMSCs, and GMSCs vs. DPSCs) and tissue-specific comparisons (aBMSCs vs. Others, DPSCs vs. Others, GMSCs vs. Others) (FDR, p<0.05 ). Further, these DEGs, either common between MSC populations or unique to a specific MSC population, were evaluated for pathways and biological processes.

Results

aBMSCs, DPSCs, and GMSCs were successfully isolated and characterized. The tissue-specific comparison revealed that DEGs were most numerous in DPSCs (693 genes) as compared to aBMSCs (103 genes) or DPSCs (232 genes). Statistically significant DEGs through pairwise comparisons present higher numbers in GMSCs vs. DPSCs (627) as compared to either DPSCs vs aBMSCs (286) or GMSCs vs. aBMSCs (82). Further analysis found that RUNX2, IBSP, SOX6, ACAN, and VCAM1 were significantly upregulated in aBMSCs. In DPSCs, BMP4 and IL6 were significantly downregulated, whereas AXL and NES were significantly upregulated. In GMSCs, AGPT1, SEMA4D, and PGDFA were significantly downregulated. Additionally, MAPK, PI3-AKT, and RAS signaling pathways were significantly regulated in GMSCs. Interestingly, aBMSCs and DPSCs revealed positive regulation of osteoblast differentiation, whereas GMSCs revealed negative regulation of osteoblast differentiation. DPSCs also revealed negative regulation of angiogenesis.

Conclusions

Oral-derived MSCs have an inherent "landscape" of differentiation defined by their tissue of origin; yet this differentiation potential can be modulated by their microenvironment.

Navigating the tumor microenvironment: mesenchymal stem cell-mediated delivery of anticancer agents

Scientific knowledge of cancer has advanced greatly throughout the years, with most recent studies findings includes many hallmarks that capture disease's multifaceted character. One of the novel approach utilised for the delivery of anti-cancer agents includes mesenchymal stem cell mediated drug delivery. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are non-haematopoietic progenitor cells that may be extracted from bone marrow, tooth pulp, adipose tissue and placenta/umbilical cord blood dealing with adult stem cells. MSCs are mostly involved in regeneration of tissue, they have also been shown to preferentially migrate to location of several types of tumour in-vivo. Usage of MSCs ought to improve both effectiveness and safety of anti-cancer drugs by enhancing delivery efficiency of anti-cancer therapies to tumour site. Numerous researches has demonstrated that various drugs, when delivered via mesenchymal stem cell mediated delivery can elicit anti-tumour effect of cells in cancers of breast cells and thyroid cells. MSCs have minimal immunogenicity because to lack of co-stimulatory molecule expression, which means there is no requirement for immunosuppression after allogenic transplantation. This current review elaborates recent advancements of mesenchyma stem cell mediated drug delivery of anti-cancer agents along with its mechanism and previously reported studies of drugs manufactured via this drug delivery system.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived from Dental Tissues: Immunomodulatory Properties and Clinical Potential

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells located in different areas of the human body. The oral cavity is considered a potential source of MSCs because they have been identified in several dental tissues (D-MSCs). Clinical trials in which cells from these sources were used have shown that they are effective and safe as treatments for tissue regeneration. Importantly, immunoregulatory capacity has been observed in all of these populations; however, this function may vary among the different types of MSCs. Since this property is of clinical interest for cell therapy protocols, it is relevant to analyze the differences in immunoregulatory capacity, as well as the mechanisms used by each type of MSC. Interestingly, D-MSCs are the most suitable source for regenerating mineralized tissues in the oral region. Furthermore, the clinical potential of D-MSCs is supported due to their adequate capacity for proliferation, migration, and differentiation. There is also evidence for their potential application in protocols against autoimmune diseases and other inflammatory conditions due to their immunosuppressive capacity. Therefore, in this review, the immunoregulatory mechanisms identified at the preclinical level in combination with the different types of MSCs found in dental tissues are described, in addition to a description of the clinical trials in which MSCs from these sources have been applied.