Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparing the operative, oncological, post-operative outcomes and complications of robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis with subgroup analysis

The majority of previously published meta-analyses compare robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD vs. LPD) across both benign and malignant lesions. This meta-analysis aims on focusing exclusively on malignant lesions, providing a detailed and targeted evaluation of operative, oncologic, and post-operative outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook and followed a pre-registered protocol on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted up to August 1, 2024. Risk of bias was performed with the ROBINS-I tool. We calculated the odds ratios and the mean differences for the dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of findings. Subgroup analyses were performed for pancreatic cancer cases exclusively. In total, eight studies involving 6648 patients (1964 RPD and 4684 LPD) were included. Significant outcomes included reduced length of hospitalization for RPD (MD = -0.94, P = 0.005) and lower conversion rates (OR = 0.20, P < 0.00001). In addition, the number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly higher for RPD (MD = 1.02, P = 0.01). Overall morbidity was significantly lower for RPD (OR = 0.50, P = 0.05). Non-significant differences were observed for estimated blood loss (P = 0.72), operative duration (P = 0.28), blood transfusion rates (P = 0.12), R0 resection rates (P = 0.60), major complications (P = 0.54), pancreatic fistula rates (P = 0.06), delayed gastric emptying (P = 0.58), reoperation rates (P = 0.20), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.97). Sensitivity analysis reduced heterogeneity without altering significant results, with the exception of overall morbidity which became non-significant in some cases, highlighting study-specific influences. Subgroup analysis for pancreatic cancer showed consistent findings with the main analysis, except overall morbidity, which became non-significant, suggesting that periampullary cancers may have influenced the observed benefits of RPD. Further analysis was limited by data availability. While RPD offers potential benefits, including shorter hospitalization, lower conversion rates, higher number of harvested lymph nodes and lower morbidity, the limited number of high-quality studies, study heterogeneity, and conflicting evidence with prior meta-analyses underscore the need for further well-designed trials focusing on specific patient populations to guide surgical decision-making. PROSPERO registration CRD42025634636.

Clinical significance of para-aortic lymph node metastasis for prognosis in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer who underwent radical surgical resections

Objective

To elucidate surgical strategies for patients undergoing radical resection, in cases where solitary distant lymph node metastasis is identified intraoperatively, we investigated the prognostic significance of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases and other regional lymph node (RLN) metastases in pancreatic carcinomas (PC) and biliary duct cancers (BDC).

Material and Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed data from 181 PC patients and 116 BDC patients who underwent radical resections at two institutions between 1994 and 2021.

Results

Among PC patients, metastases were observed in RLN and PALN in 54% and 9% of cases, respectively. Similarly, RLN and PALN metastases were present among BDC patients in 39% and 9% of cases, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that patients with BDC and PALN metastases exhibited significantly reduced disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those without PALN involvement. Multivariate analysis identified PALN metastasis as an independent predictor of OS in BDC patients (p<0.05), while RLN metastasis was independently associated with DFS (p<0.05). Additional clinicopathological factors associated with PALN and RLN metastases were also identified. Preoperative serum levels of Duke Pancreas II monoclonal antibody were significantly elevated in patients with PALN metastases. Histological findings of lymphatic or perineural infiltration and hepatic or pancreatic invasion were independently associated with RLN metastases.

Conclusion

Based on these findings, radical resection may be considered for PC patients with isolated PALN metastases only in the absence of additional adverse prognostic factors. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to further refine the criteria for surgical intervention when solitary PALN metastases are detected intraoperatively.

Perioperative risk factors for overall survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

The postoperative overall survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is not optimal. The aim of this study was to explore the perioperative risk factors for overall survival after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). From January 2015 to January 2022, consecutive patients who underwent LPD with a pathological diagnosis of PDAC at our center were included in the study. LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression were used to explore perioperative risk factors associated with overall survival. A total of 159 patients were included in the study. The median overall survival was 21 months. In the multivariate analysis, the level of direct bilirubin in serum (HR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, P = 0.043), postoperative pancreatic fistula (HR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.86, P = 0.010), and adjuvant therapy after surgery within 12 weeks (HR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.83, P = 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors associated with overall survival. A high level of direct bilirubin in the serum, happened with postoperative pancreatic fistula and delayed postoperative adjuvant therapy are prognostic risk factors affecting the overall survival of patients with PDAC after LPD.

Common hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of actual survival

BACKGROUND

The common hepatic artery lymph node (CHALN) represents a second-echelon node for tumors in the head of the pancreas. Although early studies suggested survival was comparable between the CHALN and remote metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), whether the lymph node is associated with adverse survival remains equivocal. Here, we examined a prospective cohort of patients calculating actual survival to better understand implications of this specific lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

We studied 215 patients with pancreatic head PDAC, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies at a single institution between 2010 and 2017, wherein the CHALNs were excised. We performed actual and actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses, with subsequent univariate and multivariate analyses in node-positive patients.

RESULTS

Of this cohort, 7.3% of patients had involvement of the CHALN, and all of them had metastatic spread to first-echelon nodes. Actual median survival of patients with no lymph node involvement was 49 months. In patients with any nodal involvement, the survival was no different when comparing the lymph node positive and negative (13 and 20 months, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses likewise attached no significance to the lymph node metastasis, while demonstrating worse survival with positive margin status and poorly differentiated histology. Our DFS analyses yielded similar results.

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in actual survival in node-positive patients regardless of the CHALN involvement and recommended against its assessment in prognosticating survival or guiding surgical treatment.

Intraoperative paraaortic lymph node sampling during resection for pancreatic cancer: evolving role in the modern chemotherapy era

BACKGROUND

The role of paraaortic lymph node (PALN) sampling for pancreatic cancer (PC) remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the yield of PALN sampling and its impact on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Patients treated from 2005 to 2018 were included. Since 2015, patients with borderline resectable or unresectable (BR/UR) tumours received standardized neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), whereas patients with resectable tumours underwent upfront resection.

RESULTS

Among 771 patients with PALN excision, metastasis was confirmed in 76 patients (10%) and 59 proceeded to planned resection. PALN metastasis was associated with early recurrence and shorter survival after upfront resection (1-year recurrence-free rate: 23% vs 57% for resectable tumours, P < 0.001, 9% vs 52% for BR/UR tumours, P = 0.006; median overall survival (OS): 19 vs 31 months for resectable tumours, P < 0.001, 17 vs 23 months for BR/UR tumours, P = 0.057). In contrast, they were both similar between patients with/without PALN metastasis following NAT for BR tumours (1-year recurrence-free rate, 50% vs 58%, P = 0.88; median OS, 28 vs 35 months, P = 0.45, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Occult metastasis to PALNs is not uncommon in patients with potentially resectable PC. Its prognostic impact depends on the treatment strategy, and the intraoperative decision for resection should be individualized.

Prognostic value of paraaortic lymph node metastases in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

INTRODUCTION

The role of paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cancer of the pancreatic head is controversial. The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic role of paraaortic lymph node (PALN) metastases after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients, who underwent upfront resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head at the Frankfurt University Hospital from 2011 to 2020 was performed. The primary endpoint was survival, according to the presence of PALN metastases.

RESULTS

Out of 468 patients with pancreatic resection, 148 had an upfront resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Of those, in 125 (85%) a paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed. In 19 (15.2%) PALN metastases were detected. The estimated overall median survival after resection was 21.7 months (95% CI 18.8 to 26.4), the disease free survival 16 months (95% CI 12 to 18). Among the patients with lymph node metastases, PALN metastases had no significant influence on overall (18.9 versus 19 months, HR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.6, p = 0.392) or disease free survival (14 versus 10.7 months, HR = 1.7, 95% CI 0.9 to 3.2, p = 0.076). After adjusting for T-stage, N-stage, grade, resection margin, PALN metastases, and adjuvant therapy, only adjuvant therapy had a prognostic significance for overall survival (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.85, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and PALN metastases do not have inferior outcomes than those with regional lymph node metastases. Thus, positive PALN should not be considered a contraindication for resection.

Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node status in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm - Time to consider a reclassification?

BACKGROUND

Para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) correlates with poor prognosis. The role of PALN in invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (inv-IPMN) has not been well explored. The present study investigated the rate of metastatic PALN, lymph node ratio (LNR) and the overall nodal (N) status as prognostic factors in PDAC and inv-IPMN.

METHODS

This consecutive single-center series included patients with PDAC or inv-IPMN in the pancreatic head who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy, including PALN resection between 2009 and 2018. Median overall survival (mOS) and impact of clinicopathological factors, including PALN status on survival, were evaluated.

RESULTS

403 patients were included, 314 had PDAC and 89 inv-IPMN. PALN were metastatic in 16% of PDAC and 17% of inv-IPMN. N0 status was present in 6% of the patients with PDAC and 16% of inv-IPMN patients (p = 0.007). LNR >15% was more common in PDAC (52%) than in inv-IPMN (34%) (p = 0.004). mOS was 12.7 months in the presence of PALN metastases and 22.7 months without (p < 0.0001). Age >70 years, CA19-9 >200 U/mL, PDAC and N2 status were significantly associated with worse survival in a multivariable analysis. PALN status and LNR were not independent prognostic factors. In N2 status mOS was similar regardless the presence of PALN metastases.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of PALN metastases was similar in PDAC and inv-IPMN. Although PALN positive status entailed a shorter mOS, it was not an independent risk factor for death, and did not influence survival in N2-staged disease. The M1-status for PALN positivity may need reconsideration.

Study protocol of an open-label, single arm phase II trial investigating the efficacy, safety and quality of life of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with liposomal irinotecan combined with Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/Folinic acid followed by curative surgical resection in patients with hepatic Oligometastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (HOLIPANC)

BACKGROUND

According to current guidelines, treatment of patients with hepatic oligometastasis in pancreatic cancer is not reflected and systemic chemotherapy is recommended in those patients. Retrospective data suggest beneficial outcomes in patients with hepatic oligometastasis, though prospective data from clinical trials addressing this particular patient group is not available.

METHODS

In this single arm, phase-2 trial, survival data from patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by R0/R1 resection will be compared to historic data from patients with oligometastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The clinical trial will focus on a well-defined patient collective with metastatic load limited to the liver as target organ with a maximum of five metastases. The combination of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin (OX) and 5-fluouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) (nal-IRI + OX+ 5-FU/FA, NAPOX) was chosen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the choice was based on an ongoing clinical study in which NAPOX appeared manageable, with promising anti-tumor activity in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In total 150 patients will be enrolled for this trial with an aim of 55 patients receiving a complete macroscopic synchronous tumor and metastatic resection.

DISCUSSION

This is the first clinical study to prospectively evaluate the value of multimodality therapy concepts in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

EudraCT 2019-002734-37 ; NCT04617457 .

Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary

Only 10–20% of patients with newly diagnosed resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma have potentially resectable disease. Upfront surgery is the gold standard, but it is rarely curative. After surgical extirpation of tumors, up to 80% of patients will develop cancer recurrence, and the initial relapse is metastatic in 50–70% of these patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy offers the best strategy to date to improve overall survival but faces real challenges; some patients will experience rapid disease progression within 3 months of surgery and patients who do not receive all planned cycles of chemotherapy have unfavourable oncological outcomes. The neoadjuvant approach is therefore logical but requires further investigation. This approach shows favourable trends regarding disease-free survival and overall survival but, in the absence of rigorous published phase III trials, is not validated to date. Here, we intend to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature to provide direction for future studies.

Abstract

Complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative therapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Upfront surgery is the gold standard, but it is rarely curative. Neoadjuvant treatment is a logical option, as it may overcome some of the limitations of adjuvant therapy and has already shown some encouraging results. The main concern regarding neoadjuvant therapy is the risk of disease progression during chemotherapy, meaning the opportunity to undergo the intended curative surgery is missed. We reviewed all recent literature in the following areas: major surveys, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, and randomized trials. We then selected the ongoing trials that we believe are of interest in this field and report here the results of a comprehensive review of the literature. Meta-analyses and randomized trials suggest that neoadjuvant treatment has a positive effect. However, no study to date can be considered practice changing. We considered design, endpoints, inclusion criteria and results of available randomized trials. Neoadjuvant treatment appears to be at least a feasible strategy for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic value of positive histological margins in patients with pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma and lymph node involvement: an international multicentric study

BACKGROUND

Resection margin status and lymph node (LN) involvement are known prognostic factors for patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) by resection margin status in patients with PDAC and LN involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective international multicentric study was performed including four Western centers. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors of OS and DFS. Median OS and DFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A cohort of 814 PDAC patients with pancreatoduodenectomy were analyzed. A total of 651 patients had LN involvement (80%). On multivariable analysis R1 resection was not an independent factor of worse OS and DFS in patients with LN involvement (HR 1.1, p = 0.565; HR 1.2, p = 0.174). Only tumor size, grade, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with OS and DFS. Median OS and DFS were similar between patients with R0 and R1 resections (23 vs. 20 months, p = 0.196; 15 vs. 14 months, p = 0.080).

CONCLUSION

Resection status was not identified as predictor of OS or DFS in PDAC patients with LN involvement. Extensive surgery to achieve R0 resection in such patients might not influence the disease course.

In the Era of the Leeds Protocol: A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Resection Margins on Survival Among Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A positive resection margin is considered to be a factor associated with poor prognosis after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection. However, analysis of the resection margin is dependent on the pathological slicing technique. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the impact of resection margin on the survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients whose specimens were analyzed using the axial slicing technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase datasets covering the time period from November 2006 to January 2019 was performed. Only studies with axial slicing technique (Leeds Pathology Protocol or Royal College of Pathology Protocol) were included in the final database. Meta-analysis between the marginal distance and survival was performed with the Inverse Variance Method in RevMan.

RESULTS

The systematic search resulted in nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The median survival for a resection margin 0 mm ranged from 12.3 to 23.4 months, for resection margin <0.5 mm 16 months, for resection margin <1 mm ranged from 11 to 27.5 months, for resection margin <1.5 mm ranged from 16.9 to 21.2 months, and for resection margin >2 mm ranged from 53.9 to 63.1 months. Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled multivariable hazard ratio favored resection margin ⩾1 mm (hazard ratio: 1.32 and 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.68, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Resection margins ⩾1 mm seem to lead to better survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients than resection margin <1 mm. However, there is not enough data to evaluate the effect of oncologic therapy or to analyze the impact of other resection margin distances on survival.

Survival impact based on hepatic artery lymph node status in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A study of patients receiving modern chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has significantly improved in recent years. While the involvement of the hepatic artery lymph node (HALN; station 8a lymph node) likely represents advanced disease, a comparison to patients with metastases on modern chemotherapy is lacking.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with HALN sent for pathologic review at a single institution from 2003 to 2018 were reviewed. Patients who presented with liver-only metastases at the time of PDAC diagnosis (Stage IV) and received chemotherapy were identified. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was utilized and overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 112 patients with a HALN sent for analysis, 17 (15%) were positive and 13 (76%) received chemotherapy. Ninety-four stage IV patients were identified and were significantly more likely to have received a multiagent rather than single-agent chemotherapy regimen compared to HALN positive patients (79.8% vs. 38.5%, p < .001). Median OS was significantly longer in all patients who underwent surgical resection, regardless of HALN status, compared to stage IV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with HALN positivity have significantly improved OS compared to patients with stage IV disease. HALN involvement does not significantly alter survival among resected patients and does not warrant preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy.

Para-aortic lymph node metastasis detected intraoperatively by systematic frozen section examination in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: is resection improving the prognosis?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the controversial benefit of a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with PALN metastasis intraoperatively detected by systematic frozen section examination in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

PALN intraoperative examination by frozen section was systematically performed from January 2006 to February 2018 prior to performing PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Until June 2012, PALN + patients still underwent PD (PALN+/PD group) in the framework of a prospective study. Since July 2012, PALN+ was considered as contraindicating the planned PD (PALN+/No-PD group). Post-operative morbidity and survival were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 32 PALN + patients intraoperatively detected, the first 13 underwent a PD, while the last 19 did not undergo resection. Seven patients (54%) among 13 PALN+/PD patients developed a post-operative complication against 3 (16%) among 19 PALN+/No-PD patients (p = 0.049). The median length of stay was 5 days longer for PALN+/PD patients (p = 0.001). The median survival did not differ between PALN+/No-PD and PALN+/PD groups (respectively 13.4 months (95%CI:7.6-19.3) and 11.5 months (95%CI:5.9-17.1), p = 0.471). No patient was alive 4 years after surgery in both the PALN+/No-PD or PALN+/PD groups.

CONCLUSION

In case of PALN detected intraoperatively in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, PD does not improve survival compared to current palliative treatment.

Role of lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the most devastating malignant diseases, predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. Despite advances in surgical techniques and in systemic therapy, the 5-year relative survival remains a grim 9% for all stages combined. The extent of lymphadenectomy has been discussed intensively for decades, given that even in early stages of PC, lymph node (LN) metastasis can be detected in approximately 80%.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this review was to provide an overview of the current literature evaluating the role of lymphadenectomy in resected PC. For this, we evaluated randomized controlled studies (RCTs) assessing the impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on OS and studies evaluating the prognostic impact of anatomical site of LN metastasis and the impact of the number of resected LNs on OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphadenectomy plays an essential part in the multimodal treatment algorithm of PC and is an additional therapeutic tool to increase the chance for surgical radicality and to ensure correct staging for optimal oncological therapy. Based on the literature from the last decades, standard lymphadenectomy with resection of at least ≥ 15 LNs is associated with an acceptable postoperative complication risk and should be recommended to obtain local radicality and accurate staging of the disease. Although radical surgery including appropriate lymphadenectomy of regional LNs remains the only chance for long-term tumor control, future studies specifically assessing the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on extraregional LNs are warranted.

The Necessity of Dissection of No. 14 Lymph Nodes to Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on the Embryonic Development of the Head of the Pancreas

Objectives: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) followed by lymphadenectomy is performed for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) located in the head of the pancreas. Because the head of the pancreas could be divided into dorsal or ventral primordium in relation to embryonic development, the metastasis of lymph node (LN) may differ. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the impact of extended or standard LN dissection for PDAC located in ventral or dorsal primordia of the pancreatic head.

Methods: From February 2016 to November 2018, 178 patients who underwent PD for PDAC were enrolled at the Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. According to the tumor location and the range of LN dissection, all patients were divided into three groups: ventral primordium with extended lymphadenectomy (VE group), ventral primordium with standard lymphadenectomy (VS group), and dorsal primordium with extended lymphadenectomy (DE group). Clinical and pathological features were retrospectively analyzed as were the long-term survival outcomes.

Results: More patients in the VE group were detected with metastasis in the lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery (LN14) than those in the DE group (LN along the right side of the superior mesenteric artery, LN14ab): 22.9 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.005; (LN along the left side of the superior mesenteric artery, LN14cd): 10.0 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.022. LN14 was involved in more patients in the VE group than in the VS group (22.9 vs. 5.0%, p = 0.015). For IIb-stage patients in the VE group, the overall survival time (18.3 vs. 9.3 months, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival time (12.2 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.045) were longer in those with LN14cd (–) than those with LN14cd (+).

Conclusion: This study suggested that patients with PDAC located in the ventral head of the pancreas had higher risk of LN14 involvement compared with those at dorsal. Thus, a thorough dissection of LN14 in PDAC located in the ventral head of the pancreas is recommended to optimize the regional extended lymphadenectomy.

How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?

Background

Intraoperative para-aortic lymph node (PALN) sampling during surgical exploration in patients with suspected pancreatic head cancer remains controversial.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the value of routine PALN sampling and the consequences of different treatment strategies on overall patient survival.

Methods

A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in patients who underwent surgical exploration for suspected pancreatic head cancer. In cohort A, the treatment strategy was to avoid pancreatoduodenectomy and to perform a double bypass procedure when PALN metastases were found during exploration. In cohort B, routinely harvested PALNs were not examined intraoperatively and pancreatoduodenectomy was performed regardless. PALNs were examined with the final resection specimen. Clinicopathological data, survival data and complication data were compared between study groups.

Results

Median overall survival for patients with PALN metastases who underwent a double bypass procedure was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5–8.5), versus 11 months (95% CI 8.8–13) in the pancreatoduodenectomy group (p = 0.049). Patients with PALN metastases who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy had significantly increased postoperative morbidity compared with patients who underwent a double bypass procedure (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, severe comorbidity (ASA grade 2 or higher) was an independent predictor for decreased survival in patients with PALN involvement (hazard ratio 3.607, 95% CI 1.678–7.751; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In patients with PALN metastases, pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with significant survival benefit compared with a double bypass procedure, but with increased risk of complications. It is important to weigh the advantages of resection versus bypass against factors such as comorbidities and clinical performance when positive intraoperative PALNs are found.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08304-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastases in non-pancreatic periampullary cancer

Background

Resection of the para-aortic lymph node (PALN) group Ln16b1 during pancreatoduodenectomy remains controversial because PALN metastases are associated with a worse prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. The present study aimed to analyze the impact of PALN metastases on outcome after non-pancreatic periampullary cancer resection.

Methods

One hundred sixty-four patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer who underwent curative pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively investigated. The data were supplemented with a systematic literature review on this topic.

Results

In 67 cases, the PALNs were clearly assigned and could be histopathologically analyzed. In 10.4% of cases (7/67), tumor-infiltrated PALNs (PALN+) were found. Metastatic PALN+ stage was associated with increased tumor size (P = 0.03) and a positive nodal stage (P < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic PALN and non-metastatic PALN (PALN–) was 24.8 and 29.5 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS of PALN+ and pN1 PALN patients (P = 0.834). Patients who underwent palliative surgical treatment (n = 20) had a lower median OS of 13.6 (95% confidence interval 2.7–24.5) months. Including the systematic literature review, only 23 cases with PALN+ status and associated OS could be identified; the average survival was 19.8 months.

Conclusion

PALN metastasis reflects advanced tumor growth and lymph node spread; however, it did not limit overall survival in single-center series. The available evidence of the prognostic impact of PALN metastasis is scarce and a recommendation against resection in these cases cannot be given.

Predicting Selection Preference of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in a Chinese Single Center Population: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram

BACKGROUND Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is a novel type of minimally invasive surgery to treat tumors located at the head of the pancreas. This study aimed to construct a novel prediction model for predicting selection preference for RPD in a Chinese single medical center population. MATERIAL AND METHODS The clinical data from 451 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients were collected and analyzed from January 2013 to December 2016. Twenty-three items affecting clinical strategies were optimized by LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression analysis and then were incorporated in multivariable logistic regression analysis. C-index was used for evaluating the discriminative ability. Decision curve was applied to determine clinical application of this model and the calibration of this nomogram was evaluated by calibration plot. The model was internally validated through bootstrapping validation. RESULTS Clinicopathological factors included in the model were age, history of diabetes mellitus, history of hypertension, history of heart, brain and kidney disease, history of abdominal surgery, symptoms (jaundice, accidental discovery and weight loss), anemia, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), smoking, alcohol intake, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, vascular invasion, overweight, preoperative lymph node metastasis and tumor size >3.5 cm. A C-index of 0.831 indicated good discrimination and calibration of this model. Interval validation generated an acceptable C-index of 0.787. When surgical approach was determined at the threshold of preference possibility less than 63%, decision curve analysis indicated that this model had good clinical application value in this range. CONCLUSIONS This new nomogram could be conveniently used to predict the selection preference of robotic surgery for patients with pancreatic head cancer.

Meta-analysis of the difference of medians

We consider the problem of meta-analyzing two-group studies that report the median of the outcome. Often, these studies are excluded from meta-analysis because there are no well-established statistical methods to pool the difference of medians. To include these studies in meta-analysis, several authors have recently proposed methods to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the median, sample size, and several commonly reported measures of spread. Researchers frequently apply these methods to estimate the difference of means and its variance for each primary study and pool the difference of means using inverse variance weighting. In this work, we develop several methods to directly meta-analyze the difference of medians. We conduct a simulation study evaluating the performance of the proposed median-based methods and the competing transformation-based methods. The simulation results show that the median-based methods outperform the transformation-based methods when meta-analyzing studies that report the median of the outcome, especially when the outcome is skewed. Moreover, we illustrate the various methods on a real-life data set.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and paraaortic lymph nodes metastases: The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with paraaortic lymph nodes metastases (PALN +) is associated with poor survival. Still, there are no current guidelines advocating systematic detection of PALN+.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent surgical exploration/resection with concurrent paraaortic (group 16) lymphadenectomy for PDAC between 2009 and 2016 were considered for inclusion. Resection was systematically aborted in case of intraoperative PALN + detection. Diagnostic performance of preoperative imaging upon blind review and intraoperative PALN dissection with frozen section (FS) for PALN detection were evaluated. Additionally, the prognostic significance of PALN + on overall survival (OS) was analyzed.

RESULTS

Over the study period, among 129 patients undergoing surgery for PDAC, 113 had intraoperative PALN dissection with FS analysis. Median number of resected PALN was 3 (range, 1-15). Overall, PALN+ was found in 19 patients (16.8%). Upon blind review, preoperative imaging performed poorly for PALN + detection with a low agreement between imaging and final pathology (Kappa-Cohen index<0.2). In contrast, PALN FS showed high detection performances and strong agreement with final pathology (Kappa-Cohen index = 0.783, 95%CI 0.779-0.867, p < 0.001). Regarding survival outcomes, there was no difference between patients with PALN+ and patients not resected in the setting of liver metastases or locally unresectable disease found at exploration (p = 0.708).

CONCLUSIONS

Before PD for PDAC, intraoperative PALN dissection and FS analysis yields accurate PALN assessment and allows appropriate patient selection. This should be routinely performed and aborting resection should be strongly considered in case of PALN+.

One-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians

An aggregate data meta-analysis is a statistical method that pools the summary statistics of several selected studies to estimate the outcome of interest. When considering a continuous outcome, typically each study must report the same measure of the outcome variable and its spread (eg, the sample mean and its standard error). However, some studies may instead report the median along with various measures of spread. Recently, the task of incorporating medians in meta-analysis has been achieved by estimating the sample mean and its standard error from each study that reports a median in order to meta-analyze the means. In this paper, we propose two alternative approaches to meta-analyze data that instead rely on medians. We systematically compare these approaches via simulation study to each other and to methods that transform the study-specific medians and spread into sample means and their standard errors. We demonstrate that the proposed median-based approaches perform better than the transformation-based approaches, especially when applied to skewed data and data with high inter-study variance. Finally, we illustrate these approaches in a meta-analysis of patient delay in tuberculosis diagnosis.

The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most technically difficult abdominal operations. Recent advances have allowed surgeons to attempt PD using minimally invasive surgery techniques. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the learning curve of a single surgeon who had carried out his first 100 robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in a high-volume pancreatic center.

METHODS

The data on consecutive patients who underwent RPD for malignant or benign pathologies were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The data included the demographic data, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative length of hospital stay, morbidity rate, mortality rate, and final pathological results. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the inflexion points which corresponded to the learning curve.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2016, 100 patients underwent RPD by a single surgeon. From the CUSUM operation time (CUSUM OT) learning curve, two distinct phases of the learning process were identified (early 40 patients and late 60 patients). The operation time (mean, 418 min vs. 317 min), hospital stay (mean, 22 days vs. 15 days), and estimated blood loss (mean, 227 ml vs. 134 ml) were significantly lower after the first 40 patients (P < 0.05). The pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, and reoperation rates also decreased in the late 60 patients group (P < 0.05). Non-significant reductions were observed in the incidences of major (Clavien-Dindo Grade II or higher) morbidity, postoperative death, bile leakage, gastric fistula, wound infection, and open conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

RPD was technically feasible and safe in selected patients. The learning curve was completed after 40 RPD. Further studies are required to confirm the long-term oncological outcomes of RPD.

Predictors of long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study of 5-year survivors

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard curative treatment for periampullary tumors. The aim of this study is to report the incidence and predictors of long-term survival (≥ 5 years) after PD.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent PD for pathologically proven periampullary adenocarcinomas. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group (I) patients who survived less than 5 years and group (II) patients who survived ≥ 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 47 (20.6%) long-term survivors (≥ 5 years) among 228 patients underwent PD for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma represented 31 (66.0%) of the long-term survivors. Primary analysis showed that favourable factors for long-term survival include age < 60 years old, serum CEA < 5 ng/mL, serum CA 19-9 < 37 U/mL, non-cirrhotic liver, tumor size < 2 cm, site of primary tumor, postoperative pancreatic fistula, R0 resection, postoperative chemotherapy, and no recurrence. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CA 19-9 < 37 U/mL [OR (95% CI) = 1.712 (1.248-2.348), P = 0.001], smaller tumor size [OR (95% CI )= 1.335 (1.032-1.726), P = 0.028] and Ro resection [OR (95% CI) = 3.098 (2.095-4.582), P < 0.001] were independent factors for survival ≥ 5 years. The prognosis was best for ampullary adenocarcinoma, for which the median survival was 54 months and 5-year survival rate was 39.0%, and the poorest was pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, for which the median survival was 27 months and 5-year survival rate was 7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of long-term survivors after PD for periampullary adenocarcinoma are patients with ampullary tumor. CA 19-9 < 37 U/mL, smaller tumor size, and R0 resection were found to be independent factors for long-term survival ≥ 5 years.

Lymph node 8a as a prognostic marker for poorer prognosis in pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

An investigation of patients with pancreatic carcinoma aims to identify those who will benefit from surgery. Physical examination, radiology and laboratory findings are helpful. Most prognostic markers, such as lymph node status, micro metastasis and tumour differentiation, are not preoperatively accessible. Metastatic disease in lymph node 8a (Ln8a) in patients operated for pancreatic carcinoma has been reported to be a predictor of shorter overall survival (OS). This lymph node can be assessed preoperatively through resection (possibly even with laparoscopy) and subsequent histopathology. The value of the procedure is disputed. The aim of this study is to investigate whether metastatic disease in Ln8a is a predictor of decreased OS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In patients with suspected pancreatic or periampullary carcinoma, who were operated with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), Ln8a was separately resected and analysed with standard and immuno-histochemical methods. Patients with or without metastasis in Ln8a were compared regarding OS.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2011, 122 consecutive patients were eligible and 87 were resected and had LN8a analysed separately. Sixteen patients were Ln8a + and 71 were Ln8a-. Patients with Ln8a + had a significantly reduced median OS as compared to patients with Ln8a- (0.74 (95% CI 0.26-1.26) versus 5.91 years (95% CI 2.91-), p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ln8a + was associated with a marked reduction of OS, indicating a possible role in the future preoperative workup in patients with a suspicion of pancreatic cancer.

Does revision of resection margins based on frozen section improve overall survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Margin status is the main surgical determinant of long-term outcome in pancreatic cancer. Intraoperative frozen section (IOFS) detects microscopic positive margins at a stage when margin revision is possible. The aim of this study was to determine if IOFS driven-revision of pancreatic resection margin(s) improves overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on initial FS (FSR0 for negative margin and FSR1 for positive microscopic margin) and final Permanent Section report (PSR0 for negative margin and PSR1 for positive microscopic margin): Group 1 (FSR0 → PSR0), Group 2 (FSR1 → PSR0), and Group 3 (FSR1 → PSR1). Patients in Groups 2 and 3 had surgical revision of the FSR1 margin. Data was meta-analysed.

RESULTS

4 studies included in the final analysis. No difference in OS and incidence of lymph node metastases between Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.590 and P = 0.410).

CONCLUSIONS

IOFS-based revision of R1 pancreatic resection margin does not improve OS, even when it results in an R0 margin. This suggests that any benefit of margin revision based on FS is over-ridden by markers of more advanced or aggressive disease.