Variations between the anatomical and functional distribution, based on 99m technetium -mebrofinate SPECT-CT scan, in patients at risk of post hepatectomy liver failure

Significance of predicted future liver remnant volume on liver failure risk after major hepatectomy: a case matched comparative study

Introduction

Future liver remnant volume (FLRV), a risk factor for liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatectomy (MH), is not routinely measured. This study aimed to evaluate the association between FLRV and PHLF.

Patients and methods

All patients undergoing MH (4 + segments) between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained single-centre database. Perioperative data were collected for patients with PHLF, who were matched (1:2) with non-PHLF controls. FLRV and FLRV_% (i.e., % of total liver volume) were calculated retrospectively from preoperative CT scans using Synapse-3D software, and compared between the PHLF and matched control groups.

Results

Of 711 patients undergoing MH, PHLF occurred in 27 (3.8%), of whom 24 had preoperative CT scans available. These patients were matched to 48 non-PHLF controls, 98% of whom were classified as being at high risk of PHLF on preoperative risk scoring. FLRV_% was significantly lower in the PHLF group, compared to matched controls (median: 28.7 vs. 35.2%, p = 0.010), with FLRV% < 30% in 58% and 29% of patients, respectively. Assessment of the ability of FLRV_% to differentiate between PHLF and matched controls returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.69, and an optimal cut-off value of FLRV_% < 31.5%, which yielded 79% sensitivity and 67% specificity.

Conclusions

FLRV_% is significantly predictive of PHLF after MH, with over half of patients with PHLF having FLRV_% < 30%. In light of this, we propose that all patients should undergo risk stratification prior to MH, with the high risk patients additionally being assessed with CT volumetry.

Influence of middle hepatic vein resection during right or left hepatectomy on post hepatectomy outcomes

Backgrounds/Aims

Middle hepatic vein (MHV) is usually preserved as a part of the right or left hepatectomy in order preserve the venous outflow of remnant liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate if resection of MHV could influence post-resection outcomes of standard right or left hepatectomy.

Methods

Patients who underwent standard right or left hepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Anatomical remnant liver volumes were measured retrospectively using the Hermes workstation (Hermes Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Uni- and multi-variate analyses were performed to assess the difference in outcomes of those with preservation of MHV and those without preservation.

Results

A total of 144 patients were included. Right hepatectomy was performed for 114 (79.2%) and left hepatectomy was performed for 30 (20.8%) patients. MHV was resected for 13 (9.0%) in addition to the standard right or left hepatectomy. Median remnant liver volume was significantly higher in the MHV resected group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in serum level of bilirubin, international normalized ratio, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine on postoperative day 1, 3, 5, or 10, ≥ grade IIIa complications (p = 0.44), or 90-day mortality (p = 0.41). On multivariable analysis, resection of the MHV did not influence the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure (p = 0.52).

Conclusions

Resection of the MHV at standard right or left hepatectomy did not have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes of patients with adequate remnant liver volume.

Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Retention Test of Left Hemiliver in Decision-Making for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Right Hepatectomy

Introduction: The aim of this study was to select qualified patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent right hepatectomy (RH) via intraoperative indocyanine green retention test at 15 min (ICG-R15) of the left hemiliver, which prevents severe posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Methods: Twenty HCC patients who were preoperatively planned to undergo RH were enrolled. Intraoperative ICG-R15 of left hemiliver was measured after the right Glissonean pedicle was completely blocked. Patients then underwent RH if intraoperative ICG-R15 was ≤ 10%. Otherwise, patients underwent staged RH (SRH), either associating liver partitioning and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or portal vein ligation (PVL), followed by stage-2 RH. The comparison group consisted of patients with a ratio of standard left liver volume (SLLV) of > 40% and preoperative ICG-R15 ≤ 10% who underwent RH. The clinical outcomes of these two groups were compared. Results: Of the 20 patients, six underwent stage-1 RH, six underwent ALPPS, five underwent PVL followed by stage-2 RH, and three failed to proceed to stage-2 RH after PVL. No significant differences were found among the 17 patients who underwent stage-1 or stage-2 RH in the study group, the 19 patients in the comparison group, the 11 patients in the stage-2 RH group, and the six patients in the stage-1 RH group in incidences of PHLF, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and HCC recurrence within 1 year after RH. Compared with the stage-1 ALPPS group, the mean operative time and blood loss of the stage-1 PVL group were significantly less (p <0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively). The stage-1 PVL group had a significantly longer waiting-time (43.4 vs. 14.0 days, p = 0.016) than the stage-1 ALPPS group to proceed to stage-2 RH. After stage-2 RH, tumor recurrence within 1 year was 20% (1/5) in patients after PVL and 50% (3/6) after stage-1 ALPPS. Conclusions: Intraoperative ICG-R15 ≤ 10% of left hemiliver was valuable in intraoperative decision-making for patients who were planned to undergo RH. There is a possibility that stage-1 PVL might help to select patients with more favorable biological behavior to undergo stage-2 RH.