Longitudinal assessment of structural phenotype in Brugada syndrome using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Brugada Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Fundamental and Electrophysiological New Findings

Brugada syndrome is characterized by pronounced J-ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads on surface electrocardiograms. The etiological underpinnings of these distinctive features have been the subject of extensive debate, encompassing various theories related to repolarization anomalies and conduction irregularities. Genetic investigations have unveiled SCN5A, the gene encoding NaV1.5, a critical sodium channel, as the most frequently implicated causative gene, with mutations typically manifesting as loss of function. Nonetheless, the detection rate of SCN5A mutations remains below 20%, underscoring the intricate genetic landscape of the syndrome. Histological analyses have divulged localized structural irregularities, primarily marked by fibrotic alterations, within the right ventricular outflow tract. Electrophysiological inquiries employing direct epicardial mapping techniques have uncovered localized conduction impediments concomitant with modifications in unipolar morphologies within the J-ST segment. Thus, the theory positing conduction abnormalities emerges as a compelling mechanism accounting for J-ST segment elevation. However, the precise mechanisms governing the onset of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias remain shrouded in uncertainty. Recent clinical case reports have proffered evidence supporting the notion that phase 2 reentry, arising from the marked heterogeneity in action potentials within the epicardial domain, may serve as the instigator of premature ventricular contractions, ultimately culminating in ventricular fibrillation. In light of these developments, it becomes increasingly evident that comprehending the mechanisms underlying the electrocardiographic manifestations and lethal arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome necessitates the consideration of a multifaceted perspective, transcending the binary discourse of repolarization versus depolarization anomalies.

Brugada Syndrome: More than a Monogenic Channelopathy

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac channelopathy first diagnosed in 1992 but still considered a challenging disease in terms of diagnosis, arrhythmia risk prediction, pathophysiology and management. Despite about 20% of individuals carrying pathogenic variants in the SCN5A gene, the identification of a polygenic origin for BrS and the potential role of common genetic variants provide the basis for applying polygenic risk scores for individual risk prediction. The pathophysiological mechanisms are still unclear, and the initial thinking of this syndrome as a primary electrical disease is evolving towards a partly structural disease. This review focuses on the main scientific advancements in the identification of biomarkers for diagnosis, risk stratification, pathophysiology and therapy of BrS. A comprehensive model that integrates clinical and genetic factors, comorbidities, age and gender, and perhaps environmental influences may provide the opportunity to enhance patients' quality of life and improve the therapeutic approach.

Subepicardial Cardiomyopathy: A Disease Underlying J-Wave Syndromes and Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation

Brugada syndrome (BrS), early repolarization syndrome (ERS), and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (iVF) have long been considered primary electrical disorders associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. However, recent studies have revealed the presence of subtle microstructural abnormalities of the extracellular matrix in some cases of BrS, ERS, and iVF, particularly within right ventricular subepicardial myocardium. Substrate-based ablation within this region has been shown to ameliorate the electrocardiographic phenotype and to reduce arrhythmia frequency in BrS. Patients with ERS and iVF may also exhibit low-voltage and fractionated electrograms in the ventricular subepicardial myocardium, which can be treated with ablation. A significant proportion of patients with BrS and ERS, as well as some iVF survivors, harbor pathogenic variants in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene, SCN5A, but the majority of genetic susceptibility of these disorders is likely to be polygenic. Here, we postulate that BrS, ERS, and iVF may form part of a spectrum of subtle subepicardial cardiomyopathy. We propose that impaired sodium current, along with genetic and environmental susceptibility, precipitates a reduction in epicardial conduction reserve, facilitating current-to-load mismatch at sites of structural discontinuity, giving rise to electrocardiographic changes and the arrhythmogenic substrate.