General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: Results from a randomized study

12-month outcomes of pulsed-field ablation with a variable-diameter circular catheter for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Insights into conscious sedation and fluoroscopy use

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) emerges as an innovative nonthermal energy modality for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel PFA system that uses a multichannel, circular ablation catheter with adjustable diameters in treating paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

This clinical trial (PF-Beat-AF) was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the PFA system, and were followed at discharge, 7-day, 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month post-procedure. Primary safety endpoint was the incidence of primary adverse events (PAEs). While primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence lasting >30 s during the 3-12 months evaluation period.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients were enrolled and 159 patients were treated in eight centers. Conscious sedation was used in 68.6 % of cases, and 40.9 % of procedures were completed without fluoroscopy. The mean total procedure time was 132.3 ± 40.4 min, and fluoroscopy time averaged 6.4 ± 6.8 min. Acute PVI was achieved in 100 % of patients. One PAE (0.6 %) occurred (pericardial tamponade, resolved). At 12 months, 87.7 % (95 % CI: 82.5 %-92.9 %) of patients remained free from atrial arrhythmia after the blanking period. No significant differences in effectiveness were observed between conscious sedation and general anesthesia/deep sedation, or fluoroscopy and zero-fluoroscopy cases.

CONCLUSION

The results of clinical trial demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the PFA system in treating paroxysmal AF, including successful use with conscious sedation and zero-fluoroscopy.

Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Plus Rapid-Atrial Pacing in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation is a safe and cost-effective strategy that improves catheter stability, first-pass pulmonary vein isolation, and freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the incremental value of adding rapid-atrial pacing (RAP) to HFLTV-ventilation has not yet been determined.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of HFLTV-ventilation plus RAP during RFCA of paroxysmal AF on procedural and long-term clinical outcomes compared to HFLTV-ventilation alone.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry, who underwent RFCA of paroxysmal AF using either HFLTV + RAP (500-600 msec) or HFLTV ventilation alone from April 2020 to February 2023 were included. The primary outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, long-term clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 545 patients were included in the analysis (HFLTV + RAP = 327 vs. HFLTV = 218). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. No differences were observed in procedural (HFLTV + RAP 74 [57-98] vs. HFLTV 66 [53-85.75] min, p = 0.617) and RF (HFLTV + RAP 15.15 [11.22-21.22] vs. HFLTV 13.99 [11.04-17.13] min, p = 0.620) times. Both groups showed a similar freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up (HFLTV + RAP 82.68% vs. HFLTV 86.52%, HR = 1.43, 95% CI [0.94-2.16], p = 0.093). There were no significant differences in freedom from AF-related symptoms (HFLTV + RAP 91.4% vs. HFLTV 93.1%, p = 0.476) or AF-related hospitalizations (HFLTV + RAP 98.5% vs. HFLTV 97.2%, p = 0.320). Procedure-related complications were low in both groups (HFLTV + RAP 0.6% vs. HFLTV 0%, p = 0.247).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing RFCA for paroxysmal AF, adding RAP to HFLTV-ventilation was not associated with improved procedural and long-term clinical outcomes.

Comparative analysis of anaesthesia modalities in pulmonary vein isolation: insights from a prospective multicentre registry

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia in adults, is increasing in prevalence globally. Catheter ablation (CA), particularly pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), is a key treatment option. Pulmonary vein isolation can be performed using different energy sources, including cryoballoon ablation (CBA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or pulse field ablation. Anaesthesia modalities for these procedures include general anaesthesia (GA), deep sedation (DS), and conscious sedation (CS). However, the optimal anaesthesia modality remains unclear, as previous studies have shown mixed outcomes. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of different anaesthesia modalities in PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, multicentre study, based on the Israeli Catheter Ablation Registry, evaluated the impact of different anaesthesia modalities on procedural outcomes and safety in AF ablation. Data from 1002 patients who underwent PVI between January 2019 and December 2021 across 14 centres were analysed. Patients were stratified by anaesthesia modality-CS vs. GA, with the latter encompassing DS. Key outcomes, including AF recurrence, procedural complications, and success rates, were evaluated over a 24-month follow-up period. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed for the subgroup of patients who underwent CBA. Of the 1002 patients, 53% received GA, 6.3% DS, and 40% CS, with CBA used in 84% of cases. Complete PVI was achieved in 91% of patients, with comparable success rates observed between CS and GA groups. No significant differences were found between CS and GA modalities in terms of AF recurrence rates at 12 months (15% vs. 16%) and 24 months (19.5% vs. 21.2%), or in 12-month rehospitalization rates (19.8% vs. 16.5%). Sensitivity analysis of the CBA subgroup yielded similar results, with no significant differences in AF recurrence, complications, or procedural duration between CS and GA modalities.

CONCLUSION

Conscious sedation is as safe and effective as general anaesthesia in AF ablation, particularly with cryoablation. The choice of anaesthesia appears to be driven by patient characteristics and institutional factors without affecting long-term outcomes such as AF recurrence or complication rates.

High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation improves procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: Prospective multicenter registry

BACKGROUND

High-frequency, low-tidal volume (HFLTV) ventilation increases the efficacy and efficiency of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Whether those benefits can be extrapolated to RFCA of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is undetermined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether using HFLTV ventilation during RFCA in patients with PeAF is associated with improved procedural and long-term clinical outcomes compared to standard ventilation (SV).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter registry (REAL-AF), patients who had undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) + posterior wall isolation (PWI) for PeAF using either HFLTV ventilation or SV were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural and long-term clinical outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included (HFLTV=95 vs. SV=115) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Procedural time (80 [66-103.5] minutes vs 110 [85-141] minutes; P <.001), total radiofrequency (RF) time (18.73 [13.93-26.53] minutes vs 26.15 [20.30-35.25] minutes; P <.001), and pulmonary vein RF time (11.35 [8.78-16.69] minutes vs 18 [13.74-24.14] minutes; P <.001) were significantly shorter using HFLTV ventilation compared with SV. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was significantly higher with HFLTV ventilation compared with SV (82.1% vs 68.7%; hazard ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval [0.21-0.82]; P = .012), indicating a 43% relative risk reduction and a 13.4% absolute risk reduction in all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence. There was no difference in long-term procedure-related complications between the groups (HFLTV 1.1% vs SV 0%, P = .270).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing RFCA with PVI + PWI for PeAF, the use of HFLTV ventilation was associated with higher freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up, with significantly shorter procedural and RF times compared to SV, while reporting a similar safety profile.

Deep neuromuscular blockade during radiofrequency catheter ablation under general anesthesia reduces the prevalence of atrial fibrillation recurrence when compared to moderate neuromuscular blockade: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Proper anesthesia management is required to maintain immobilization and stable breathing of the patient to improve catheter contact and stability during catheter ablation for PVI. However, it remains unclear whether the depth of neuromuscular blockade affects the results of RFCA under general anesthesia.

METHODS

The patients were randomly assigned to either the moderate neuromuscular blockade group (Group M, train-of-four 1 to 2) or the deep neuromuscular blockade group (Group D, posttetanic count 1-2). The primary outcome was the 12-month AF recurrence rate using confirmed electrocardiographic diagnosis after the ablation procedure at two different neuromuscular blockade depths.

RESULTS

Total 94 patients (47 in each group) were included in the analysis. Recurrence of AF during the A 12-month follow-up was 12 (25%) in group D and 22 (46%) in group M. The AF recurrence rate was significantly higher in group M (p =  0.03). The relative risk (RR) for the risk of 12-month AF recurrence was 0.545 in group D. AF symptom recurrence was observed during the A 12-month follow-up in 12 (25%) and 26 (54%) patients in groups D and M, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to moderate neuromuscular blockade, deep neuromuscular blockade while performing RFCA under general anesthesia reduced 12-month AF recurrence rate. Deep neuromuscular blockade under general anesthesia is thought to increase the success rate by providing a stable surgical environment during the RFCA procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials of Korea KCT 0003371.

Impact of proximity of left atrium to descending aorta on left inferior pulmonary vein triggers or drivers of atrial fibrillation: A risk score model

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have investigated cardiac anatomy and clinical parameters as predictors for pulmonary vein and non-pulmonary vein triggers.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the link between the descending aorta to left inferior pulmonary vein (Dao-LIPV) distance and the occurrence of triggers and drivers in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures.

METHODS

Drug-refractory AF patients who underwent first-time index catheter ablation from January 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively assembled. The Dao-LIPV distance was measured from preablation pulmonary vein computed tomography. Patients were assigned to groups on the basis of the presence of LIPV triggers or drivers. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 886 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF were studied, and 63 (7.1%) patients were identified to have LIPV triggers or drivers. The Dao-LIPV distance had a better predictive performance (area under the curve, 0.70) compared with persistent AF (area under the curve, 0.57). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Dao-LIPV distance ≤2.5 mm (odds ratio, 3.96; 95% CI, 2.15-7.29; P < .001) and persistent AF (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.02-2.94]; P = .044) were independent predictors for the presence of LIPV triggers or drivers. A risk score model was established to predict the probability of LIPV triggers or drivers with persistent AF (10.2%), Dao-LIPV distance ≤2.5 mm (11.4%), and both (15.0%).

CONCLUSION

The proximity of the Dao-LIPV was correlated to the presence of LIPV triggers or drivers. We developed a risk score model indicating that persistent AF and Dao-LIPV distances ≤2.5 mm significantly increase the risk of LIPV triggers or drivers, aiding electrophysiologists in preparing for and performing catheter ablation more effectively.

Management of anesthesia for procedures in the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory

The complexity of cardiac electrophysiology procedures has increased significantly during the past 3 decades. Anesthesia requirements of these procedures can differ on the basis of patient- and procedure-specific factors. This manuscript outlines various anesthesia strategies for cardiac implantable electronic devices and electrophysiology procedures, including preprocedural, procedural, and postprocedural management. A team-based approach with collaboration between cardiac electrophysiologists and anesthesiologists is required with careful preprocedural and intraprocedural planning. Given the recent advances in electrophysiology, there is a need for specialized cardiac electrophysiology anesthesia care to improve the efficacy and safety of the procedures.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Predictors of Clinical Success of Cardioneuroablation in Patients With Syncope: Results of a Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a promising treatment for syncope.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to analyze the success and risk of CNA, and to describe predictive factors of CNA success in patients with syncope.

METHODS

Seventy-seven consecutive patients with syncope treated with CNA in 22 hospitals and at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Patients with reflex cardioinhibitory, mixed syncope, functional sinus node dysfunction (SND), or functional atrioventricular block were included. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of syncope after the CNA.

RESULTS

Mean age was 49.3 ± 13.4 years and 54.5% were women. Five (6.5%) patients presented complications. Three patients presented SND, 1 required a pacemaker. During a median follow-up of 12 months (Q1-Q3: 8-20 months), 26 (33.8%) patients had recurrence of syncope. Women had a significantly higher risk of recurrence compared with men (HR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.2-8.8; P = 0.016). Patients >50 years of age had a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared with younger patients (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9; P = 0.032). The risk of recurrence in mixed syncope was significantly higher than in cardioinhibitory syncope (HR: 4.4; 95% CI: 1.1-17.5; P = 0.033). Syncope recurrence was significantly less frequent in patients treated with general anesthesia or deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (HR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6; P = 0.002). Finally, the number of radiofrequency applications (≤30 or >30) had a significant association with CNA success (HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9; P = 0.042). These results were adjusted for confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, the effectiveness of CNA was less than previously reported. We found a 3.9% risk of SND. Male sex, age >50 years, cardioinhibitory syncope, general anesthesia or deep sedation, and >30 radiofrequency applications could predict success of CNA for syncope.

Pulsed Field Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience of the Efficacy and Safety in Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Beyond

Regional differences in pulsed field ablation (PFA) adoption for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with additional posterior wall ablation (PWA) in Asia remains unknown. We hereby report our experience on the safety and efficacy of PFA in AF ablation. Consecutive AF patients who underwent PFA from September 2022 to January 2024 were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 90-day blanking period at 12 months. Safety endpoints included 30 days of all-cause death, cardiac tamponade, stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure hospitalization. One hundred and one (72.3% males, 79.2% pAF) patients underwent PFA for AF. Thirty-one (30.7%) had structural heart disease with mean LVEF of 57.4 ± 8.1% and CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.4 ± 1.3. Twenty-nine (28.7%) underwent additional PWA (PVI + PWA) using PFA. PWA was acutely successful in all patients. Patients who underwent PWA were more likely to have persistent AF and require general anesthesia and electroanatomic mapping (all p < 0.05). Total PFA applications for PVI, LA dwell time, procedural time, and fluoroscopy time were similar between the PVI-only and PVI + PWA groups (all p > 0.05). The 1-year atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates were 10% for pAF and 21% for the persistent AF group. The primary efficacy endpoint was not significantly different between the PVI-only and PVI+PWA groups (12-month KM estimates 90.3% [95% CI, 83.3-97.3] and 82.8% [95% CI, 68.1-97.4], respectively). There were no complications related to PFA use. PFA can be safely, effectively, and efficiently adopted for AF ablation. Additional PWA, if pursued, had similar procedural metrics to the PVI-only strategy without increased complications.

Anesthetic Techniques for Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Review

Atrial fibrillation, the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, has witnessed significant advancements in treatment modalities, transitioning from invasive procedures like the maze procedure to minimally invasive catheter ablation techniques. This review focuses on recent improvements in anesthetic approaches that enhance outcomes in catheter atrial fibrillation ablation. We highlight the efficacy of contact force sensing catheters with steerable introducer sheaths, which outperform traditional catheters by ensuring more effective contact time and lesion formation. Comparing general anesthesia with conscious sedation, we find that general anesthesia provides superior catheter stability due to reduced respiratory variability, resulting in more effective lesion formation, and reduced pulmonary vein reconnection. The use of high-frequency jet ventilation under general anesthesia, delivering low tidal volumes, effectively minimizes left atrial movement, decreasing catheter displacement and procedure time, and reducing recurrence in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. An alternative, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation using conventional ventilators, also shows improved catheter stability and lesion durability compared to traditional ventilation methods. However, a detailed comparative study of high-frequency jet ventilation, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation, and conventional mechanical ventilation in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is lacking. This review emphasizes the need for such studies to identify optimal anesthetic techniques, potentially enhancing patient outcomes in atrial fibrillation treatment. Our findings suggest that careful selection of anesthetic methods, including ventilation strategies, plays a crucial role in the success of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, warranting further research for evidence-based practice.

Anatomical-guided third-generation laser balloon ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous rhythm monitoring: results from a multicentre prospective study

AIMS

The third-generation laser balloon (LB3) is an established ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) that allows direct visualization of the anatomical target. Equipped with an automatic circumferential laser delivery modality, it aims at continuous circumferential PVI, improving both acute and clinical outcomes. We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy of LB3 ablation using an anatomical-based approach without verifying electrical isolation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 257 paroxysmal AF patients undergoing LB3 ablation across four Italian centres, 204 (72% male, mean age 60.4 ± 11.1 years) were included. The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence after the blanking period (BP), assessed with implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs). All pulmonary veins (PVs) were targeted using the LB3, with the RAPID mode used on an average of 96 ± 8, 86 ± 19, 98 ± 11, and 84 ± 15% for the left superior, left inferior, right superior, right inferior PV, and left common ostium, respectively. Freedom from arrhythmia recurrences was 84.8% at 1, 80.4% at 2, and 76.0% at 3 years. An ATa burden ≥ 5% was documented in 2.5, 4.4, and 5.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Relapses during the BP [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.182, P = 0.032] and left atrial dilation (HR = 1.964, P = 0.048) were independent predictors of recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical-guided LB3 ablation for paroxysmal AF is a safe and effective approach, providing excellent clinical outcomes as assessed by ICM over nearly 3 years of follow-up.

Lesion characteristics using high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation versus standard ventilation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long-term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high-power short-duration ablation. Thirty-five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p < .001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p < .001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p < .001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p < .001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

HFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV.

Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation as general anesthesia airway managements for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

The current evidence on the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an airway management technique for general anesthesia (GA) during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) is insufficient. This study aims to compare the feasibility, safety, and clinical benefits of LMA and endotracheal intubation (ETI) for airway management in AF CA.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with AF who underwent CA under GA were included and divided into two groups based on different airway management methods (66 in the LMA group, 86 in the ETI group). After propensity score matching, a final analysis cohort of 132 patients was obtained to compare procedural parameters, adverse events, and prognosis between the two groups.

RESULTS

The LMA group exhibited significantly shorter total procedural time (p = 0.039), anesthesia induction time (p = 0.015), and recovery time (p = 0.006) compared to the ETI group. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were significantly lower in the LMA group during extubation and 1-min post-extubation (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the LMA group demonstrated lower MAP levels during intubation (p = 0.029). The incidences of intraoperative hypotension (p = 0.017) and bradycardia (p = 0.032) were significantly lower in the LMA group. The incidences of delayed recovery or delirium (p = 0.027), laryngeal or airway injury (p = 0.016), cough or bucking (p = 0.001), and sore throat (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the LMA group. There were no statistically significant differences in catheter stability parameters and sinus rhythm maintenance rates between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LMA is feasible, safe, and effective in AF CA as an optimized airway management technique for GA.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

General Anesthesia Improves Efficiency of High-Power Short-Duration Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison with Mild Conscious Sedation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia globally. High-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) for AF has recently emerged, reducing ablation times and enhancing patient tolerability with comparable efficacy and safety. While the benefits of general anesthesia (GA) for standard-power, standard-duration CA are well-established, data comparing GA to mild conscious sedation (MCS) for high-power, short-duration CA are limited.

METHODS

We included patients undergoing high-power, short-duration CA for AF under GA (group 1) or MCS (group 2). Procedural characteristics, success rates, and mid-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 131 patients, 47 in the GA group and 84 in the MCS group, were included. CA was performed for paroxysmal AF in 34 patients in group 1 (72.3%) and 68 patients in group 2 (80.9%). We found lower a mean total procedure time (100 [90-120] vs. 160 [130-180] min, p < 0.0001), lower radiation exposure (932.5 [625-1716] vs. 2445 [1228-4791] μGy, p < 0.0001 and 4.5 [3-7.1] 7.3 [4.2-13.5] min, p = 0.0003) and fewer RF applications (71 [54.8-83.8] vs. 103 [88.5-120.5], p < 0.0001) in the GA group. No major complications occurred. The 6-month AF recurrence rate was comparable between the groups (21.2% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing high-power, short-duration RFCA for AF, the use of GA is associated with better procedural efficiency while simultaneously associated with an early recurrence rate comparable to MCS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Lesion metrics and 12-month outcomes of very-high power short duration radiofrequency ablation (90W/4 s) under mild conscious sedation

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often performed under general anaesthesia (GA) or deep sedation. Anaesthetic availability is limited in many centers, and deep sedation is prohibited in some countries without anaesthetic support. Very high-power short duration (vHPSD-90W/4 s) PVI using the Q-Dot catheter is generally well tolerated under mild conscious sedation (MCS) though an understanding of catheter stability and long-term effectiveness is lacking. We analyzed lesion metrics and 12-month freedom from atrial arrythmia with this approach.

METHODS

Our approach to radiofrequency (RF) PVI under MCS is standardized and includes a single catheter approach with a steerable sheath. We identified patients undergoing Q-Dot RF PVI between March 2021 and December 2022 in our center, comparing those undergoing vHPSD ablation under MCS (90W/MCS) against those undergoing 50 W ablation under GA (50 W/GA) up to 12 months of follow-up. Data were extracted from clinical records and the CARTO system.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients met our inclusion criteria (51 90W/MCS; 32 50 W/GA). Despite shorter ablation times (353 vs. 886 s; p < .001), the 90 W/MCS group received more lesions (median 87 vs. 58, p < .001), resulting in similar procedure times (149.3 vs. 149.1 min; p = .981). PVI was achieved in all cases, and first pass isolation rates were similar (left wide antral circumferential ablation [WACA] 82.4% vs. 87.5%, p = .758; right WACA 74.5% vs. 78.1%, p = .796; 90 W/MCS vs. 50 W/GA respectively). Analysis of 6647 ablation lesions found similar mean impedance drops (10.0 ± 1.9 Ω vs. 10.0 ± 2.2 Ω; p = .989) and mean contact force (14.6 ± 2.0 g vs. 15.1 ± 1.6 g; p = .248). Only median 2.5% of lesions in the 90 W/MCS cohort failed to achieve ≥ 5 Ω drop. In the 90 W/MCS group, there were no procedural related complications, and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was observed in 78.4%.

CONCLUSION

vHPSD PVI is feasible under MCS, with encouraging acute and long-term procedural outcomes. This provides a compelling option for centers with limited anaesthetic support.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Esophageal injury, perforation, and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation are rare but serious complications following atrial fibrillation ablation. In this review article, we outline the incidence, pathophysiology, predictors, and preventative strategies of this dreaded complication.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in 10 databases/electronic search engines to access relevant publications. All articles reporting complications following atrial fibrillation ablation, including esophageal injury and fistula formation, were included for systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of 130 manuscripts were identified for the final review process. The overall incidence of esophageal injury following atrial fibrillation ablation was significantly higher with thermal ablation modalities (radiofrequency 5-40%, cryoballoon 3-25%, high-intensity focused ultrasound < 10%) as opposed to non-thermal ablation modalities (no cases reported to date). The incidence of esophageal perforation and fistula formation with the use of thermal ablation modalities is estimated to occur in less than 0.25% of all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. The use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring probe and mechanical esophageal deviation showed protective effect toward reducing the incidence of this complication. The prognosis is very poor for patients who develop atrioesophageal fistula, and the condition is rapidly fatal without surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation are rare complications with poor prognosis. Various strategies have been proposed to protect the esophagus and reduce the incidence of this fearful complication. Pulsed field ablation is a promising new ablation technology that may be the future answer toward reducing the incidence of esophageal complications.

General anesthesia enhances lesion quality and ablation efficiency of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. General anesthesia (GA) resolves the problem of pain intolerability and provides regular respiratory mode which might improve the catheter maneuverability of AF ablation. This study aims to compare the procedural performance of PVI under GA versus conscious sedation (CS) from multiple perspectives.

Methods

A total of 36 consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation under GA were enrolled in GA group. Another 109 patients receiving AF ablation under CS in the same period were selected as the control group. After propensity score matching, 29 matched pairs with similar baseline characteristics were available for further analysis. The AIFV (using AI to analyze the raw data from CARTO3 system) system was used to evaluate six procedural parameters in each PVI procedure.

Results

Compared with CS, PVI under GA had a significantly shorter total PVI time (51.4 min vs. 67.8 min; p = .003) and higher radiofrequency ratio (62.6% vs. 55.8%; p = .032). The number of gaps (1.0 vs. 3.0; p < .001) and the rate of break point were significantly lower in the GA group. GA was also associated with a higher effective ablation-index ratio (87.5% vs. 74.1%; p < .001) and effective force-over-time ratio (85.3% vs. 69.2%; p = .001). After a medium follow-up time of 24 months, 12/29 (41.4%) patients in the CS group and 6/29 (20.7%) patients in the GA group suffered from AF recurrence (p = .156).

Conclusions

GA improves the lesion quality and procedural efficiency of PVI from multiple perspectives evaluated by the AIFV system.

Pulsed-field versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation-Impact of energy source on sedation and analgesia requirement

INTRODUCTION

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) represents a novel, nonthermal energy modality that can be applied for single-shot pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). Comparative data with regard to deep sedation to established single-shot modalities such as cryoballoon (CB) ablation are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare a deep sedation protocol in patients receiving PVI with either PFA or CB.

METHODS

Prospective, consecutive AF patients undergoing PVI with a pentaspline PFA catheter were compared to a retrospective CB-PVI cohort of the same timeframe. Study endpoints were the requirements of analgesics, cardiorespiratory stability, and sedation-associated complications.

RESULTS

A total of 100 PVI patients were included (PFA n = 50, CB n = 50, mean age 66 ± 10.6, 61% male patients, 65% paroxysmal AF). Requirement of propofol, midazolam, and sufentanyl was significantly higher in the PFA group compared to CB [propofol 0.14 ± 0.04 mg/kg/min in PFA vs. 0.11 ± 0.04 mg/kg/min in CB (p = .001); midazolam 0.00086 ± 0.0004 mg/kg/min in PFA vs. 0.0006295 ± 0.0003 mg/kg/min in CB (p = .002) and sufentanyl 0.0013 ± 0.0007 µg/kg/min in PFA vs. 0.0008 ± 0.0004 µg/kg/min in CB (p < .0001)]. Sedation-associated complications did not differ between both groups (PFA n = 1/50 mild aspiration pneumonia, CB n = 0/50, p > .99). Nonsedation-associated complications (PFA: n = 2/50, 4%, CB: n = 1/50, 2%, p > .99) and procedure times (PFA 75 ± 31, CB 84 ± 32 min, p = .18) did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is associated with higher sedation and especially analgesia requirements. However, the safety of deep sedation does not differ to CB ablation.

Investigating Deep Sedation With Intravenous Ketamine in Spontaneous Respiration During Pulsed-Field Ablation

OBJECTIVES

The authors report their experience of a protocol for deep sedation with ketamine in spontaneous respiration during the pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF).

DESIGN

Observational, prospective, nonrandomized fashion.

SETTING

Single-center hospitalized patients.

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive patients undergoing PFA of AF.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients undergoing deep sedation with intravenous ketamine.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors' sedation protocol involves the intravenous administration of fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg) at low doses before local anesthesia with lidocaine. A ketamine adjunct (1 mg/kg) in 5-minute boluses was injected about 5 minutes before the first PFA delivery. The authors enrolled 117 patients (age = 59 ± 10 y, 74.4% males, body mass index = 27.6 ± 5 kg/m2, fluoroscopy time = 24 ± 14 minutes, skin-to-skin time = 80 ± 40 minutes and PFA LA dwell time = 24 ± 7 minutes). By the end of the procedure, pulmonary vein isolation had been achieved in all patients using PFA alone. The mean time under sedation was 54.9 ± 6 minutes, with 92 patients (79%) being sedated for <1 hour. A satisfactory Ramsay Sedation Scale level before ketamine administration was achieved in all patients, except one (80.3% of the patients with rank 3; 18.4% with rank 2). In all procedures, the satisfaction level was found acceptable by both the patient and the primary operator (satisfactory in 98.2% of cases). All patients achieved a Numeric Rating Scale for Pain ≤3 (none or mild). No major procedure or anesthesia-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

The authors' standardized sedation protocol with the administration of drugs with rapid onset and pharmacologic offset at low doses was safe and effective, with an optimal degree of patient and operator satisfaction.

Impact of anesthetic management on catheter ablation for premature ventricular complexes: insights during the COVID-19 outbreak

BACKGROUND

The influence of divergent anesthesia types during ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is not known. While previously performed under general anesthesia (GA) at our institution, these procedures were exclusively performed under local anesthesia (LA) ± minimal sedation during the COVID-19 outbreak for logistic reasons.

METHODS

One hundred and eight consecutive patients (82 GA versus 26 LA) undergoing PVC ablation at our center were evaluated. Intraprocedural PVC burden (over 3 min) pre-ablation was measured twice: (1) at the start (before GA induction) and (2) before catheter insertion (after GA induction). Upon cessation of ablation and after a waiting period of ≥ 15 min, acute ablation success (AAS) was defined as absence of PVCs until the end of the recording period.

RESULTS

Intraprocedural PVC burden was not significantly different between LA versus GA group: (1) 17.8 ± 3% vs 12.7 ± 2%, P = 0.17 and (2) 10.0 ± 3% vs 7.4 ± 1%, P = 0.43, respectively. Activation mapping-based ablation was performed significantly more in the LA vs GA group (77% vs 26% of patients, P < 0.001, respectively). AAS was significantly higher in LA vs GA group: 22/26 (85%) vs 41/82 (50%), respectively, P < 0.01. After multivariable analysis, LA was the only independent predictor for AAS (OR 13, 95% CI 1.57-107.4, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Ablation of PVC under LA presented significantly higher AAS rate compared to GA. The procedure under GA might be complicated by PVC inhibition (after catheter insertion/during mapping) and PVC disinhibition post-extubation.

Impact of general anesthesia on ablation catheter stability during pulmonary vein isolation based on a novel measurement approach

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is performed under general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). GA during PVI may improve treatment outcomes by improving catheter stability. However, the magnitude of GA-derived catheter stability compared with that of CS is unclear. We directly assessed catheter movement and determined the impact of GA compared with that of CS on ablation catheter stability during PVI. Patients who underwent initial ablation using the EnSite Precision™ mapping system were recruited and divided into two groups (GA and CS groups). The two groups were compared for ablation catheter stability during PVI based on the distance traveled by the catheter distal tip per second, clinical periprocedural characteristics, and periprocedural complications. Among 69 consecutively admitted patients, data of 30 patients (17 in the GA group and 13 in the CS group) and the distance traveled per second by the catheter on 148,976 points/patient were evaluated. The GA group had a significantly smaller catheter tip travel distance than the CS group (0.92 [0.82‒1.16] vs. 1.25 [1.14‒1.38], p = 0.01). Therefore, GA during PVI for AF provides greater catheter stability than CS and will contribute to more accessible and safer PVI procedures.

Sedation strategies for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation: focus on deep sedation with intravenous ketamine in spontaneous respiration

AIMS

A standardized sedation protocol for pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) through irreversible cellular electroporation has not been well established. We report our experience of a protocol for deep sedation with ketamine in spontaneous respiration during the PFA of AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive patients undergoing PFA for AF at our center were included. Our sedation protocol involves the intravenous administration of fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg) at low doses before local anesthesia with lidocaine. A ketamine adjunct (1 mg/kg) was injected about 5 minutes before the first PFA delivery. We enrolled 66 patients (age = 59 ± 9 years, 78.8% males, body mass index = 28.8 ± 5 kg/m2, fluoroscopy time = 21[15-30] min, skin-to-skin time = 75[60-100] min and PFA LA dwell time = 25[22-28] min). By the end of the procedure, PVI had been achieved in all patients by means of PFA alone. The mean time under sedation was 56.4 ± 6 min, with 50 (76%) patients being sedated for less than 1 hour. A satisfactory Ramsey Sedation Scale level before ketamine infusion was achieved in all patients except one (78.8% of the patients with rank 3; 19.7% with rank 2). In all procedures, the satisfaction level was found to be acceptable by both the patient and the primary operator (Score = 0 in 98.5% of cases). All patients reported none or mild pain. No major procedure or anesthesia-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our standardized sedation protocol with the administration of drugs with rapid onset and pharmacological offset at low doses was safe and effective, with an optimal degree of patient and operator satisfaction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice (ATHENA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT05617456.

High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Improves Long-Term Outcomes in AF Ablation: A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-frequency, low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation is a safe and simple strategy to improve catheter stability and first-pass isolation during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. However, the impact of this technique on long-term clinical outcomes has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess acute and long-term outcomes of HFLTV ventilation compared with standard ventilation (SV) during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter registry (REAL-AF), patients undergoing PAF ablation using either HFLTV or SV were included. The primary outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and hospitalizations at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 661 patients were included. Compared with those in the SV group, patients in the HFLTV group had shorter procedural (66 [IQR: 51-88] minutes vs 80 [IQR: 61-110] minutes; P < 0.001), total RF (13.5 [IQR: 10-19] minutes vs 19.9 [IQR: 14.7-26.9] minutes; P < 0.001), and PV RF (11.1 [IQR: 8.8-14] minutes vs 15.3 [IQR: 12.4-20.4] minutes; P < 0.001) times. First-pass PV isolation was higher in the HFLTV group (66.6% vs 63.8%; P = 0.036). At 12 months, 185 of 216 (85.6%) in the HFLTV group were free from all-atrial arrhythmia, compared with 353 of 445 (79.3%) patients in the SV group (P = 0.041). HLTV was associated with a 6.3% absolute reduction in all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, lower rate of AF-related symptoms (12.5% vs 18.9%; P = 0.046), and hospitalizations (1.4% vs 4.7%; P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

HFLTV ventilation during catheter ablation of PAF improved freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF-related symptoms, and AF-related hospitalizations with shorter procedural times.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a randomized study

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF), typical atrial flutter (AFL), and other atrial tachycardias (ATs) are common in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Frequently, several supraventricular arrhythmias are successively observed in individual patients. We investigated the hypothesis of whether more extensive radiofrequency catheter ablation of the bi-atrial arrhythmogenic substrate instead of clinical arrhythmia ablation alone results in superior clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH) and supraventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with combined post- and pre-capillary or isolated pre-capillary PH and supraventricular arrhythmia indicated to catheter ablation were enrolled in three centres and randomized 1:1 into two parallel treatment arms. Patients underwent either clinical arrhythmia ablation only (Limited ablation group) or clinical arrhythmia plus substrate-based ablation (Extended ablation group). The primary endpoint was arrhythmia recurrence >30 s without antiarrhythmic drugs after the 3-month blanking period. A total of 77 patients (mean age 67 ± 10 years; 41 males) were enrolled. The presumable clinical arrhythmia was AF in 38 and AT in 36 patients, including typical AFL in 23 patients. During the median follow-up period of 13 (interquartile range: 12; 19) months, the primary endpoint occurred in 15 patients (42%) vs. 17 patients (45%) in the Extended vs. Limited ablation group (hazard ratio: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.0). There was no excess of procedural complications and clinical follow-up events including an all-cause death in the Extended ablation group.

CONCLUSION

Extensive ablation, compared with a limited approach, was not beneficial in terms of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with AF/AT and PH.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04053361.

Major drivers of healthcare system costs and cost variability for routine atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) but incurs significant financial costs to payers. Reducing variability may improve cost effectiveness.

Objectives

We aimed to measure (1) the components of direct and indirect costs for routine AF ablation procedures, (2) the variability of those costs, and (3) the main factors driving ablation cost variability.

Methods

Using data from the University of Utah Health Value Driven Outcomes system, we were able to measure direct, inflation-adjusted costs of uncomplicated, routine AF ablation to the healthcare system. Direct costs were considered costs incurred by pharmacy, disposable supplies, patient labs, implants, and other services categories (primarily anesthesia support) and indirect costs were considered within imaging, facility, and electrophysiology lab management categories.

Results

A total of 910 patients with 1060 outpatient ablation encounters were included from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Disposable supplies accounted for the largest component of cost with 44.8 ± 9.7%, followed by other services (primarily anesthesia support) with 30.4 ± 7.7% and facility costs with 16.1 ± 5.6%; pharmacy, imaging, and implant costs each contributed <5%. Direct costs were larger than indirect costs (82.4 ± 5.6% vs 17.6 ± 5.6%). Multivariable regression showed that procedure operator was the primary factor associated with AF ablation overall cost (up to 12% differences depending on operator).

Conclusions

Direct costs and other services (primarily anesthesia) drive the majority costs associated with AF ablations. There is significant variability in costs for these routine, uncomplicated AF ablation procedures. The procedure operator, and not patient characteristic, is the main driver for cost variability.

Differential gap location after radiofrequency versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: Insights from a randomized trial with protocol-mandated repeat procedure

INTRODUCTION

Reconnections to pulmonary vein (PV) triggers of atrial fibrillation (AF) are the primary cause of AF recurrence after PV isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) or cryoballoon catheter ablation (CRYO), but method-specific contributions to PV reconduction pattern and conductive gap location are incompletely understood.

METHODS

The objective of this radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation substudy was to determine procedure-specific patterns of PV reconduction in a randomized population with protocol-mandated repeat procedures, irrespective of AF recurrence. Each PV was assessed in turn and PV reconnection sites were identified by high-density electroanatomical mapping and locating the earliest activation site. Gap locations were verified by PV re-isolation.

RESULTS

In 98 patients, 81% versus 76% previously isolated PVs remained isolated after CRYO versus RF (risk ratio [RR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.18; p = .28). There were no significant differences for any PV: left superior PV: 90% versus 80%; left inferior PV: 80% versus 78%; right superior PV: 81% versus 80%, and right inferior PV: 76% versus 73%. For each reconnected PV, 34% of ipsilateral PVs were also reconnected after CRYO compared with 64% after RF (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.90; p = .01). After RF, gaps were clustered by the carina and adjacent segments, whereas they were more heterogeneously distributed after CRYO.

CONCLUSION

Although RF and CRYO produce similar proportions of durably isolated PVs, gap locations appear to develop in procedure-specific patterns. After RF, ipsilateral PV reconduction is more frequent and gap sites cluster by the carina, suggesting that this region should be selectively ablated for more durable PVI.

A sudden increase in heart rate during ablation of the right superior pulmonary venous vestibule is correlated with pain-relief in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

A sudden increase in heart rate (HR) during ablation of the right superior pulmonary venous vestibule (RSPVV) is often detected in patients undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI). In our clinical practices, we observed that some patients had few complaints of pain during the procedures under conscious sedation.

AIM

We aimed to investigate whether there is a correlation between a sudden increase in HR during AF ablation of the RSPVV and pain relief under conscious sedation.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 161 consecutive paroxysmal AF patients who underwent the first ablation from July 1, 2018, to November 30, 2021. Patients were assigned to the R group when they had a sudden increase in HR during the ablation of the RSPVV, and the others were assigned to the NR group. Atrial effective refractory period and HR were measured before and after the procedure. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, vagal response (VR) during ablation, and the amount of fentanyl used were also documented.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were assigned to the R group, and the remaining 80 were assigned to the NR group. The post-ablation HR (86.3 ± 8.8 vs. 70.0 ± 9.4 b/min; p ≤ 0.001) was higher in the R group than in pre-ablation. Ten patients in the R group had VRs during CPVI, as well as 52 patients in the NR group. The VAS score [2.3 (1.3-3.4) vs. 6.0 (4.4-6.9); p ≤ 0.001)] and the amount of fentanyl used (107 ± 12 vs. 172 ± 26 ug; p ≤ 0.001) were significantly lower in the R group.

CONCLUSION

A sudden increase in HR during the ablation of the RSPVV was correlated with pain relief in patients undergoing AF ablation under conscious sedation.

Best Practice Guide for Cryoballoon Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: The Compilation Experience of More than 1000 Procedures

Nowadays, the cryoballoon (CB) constitutes an established alternative to radio frequency (RF) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), which offers the possibility to isolate the PVs with a single application. Since the introduction of the second-generation CB, we prospectively collected our data to optimize the procedure on >1000 consecutive patients who underwent CB PVI performed in our center. It is expected that subsequent guidelines will suggest first-line PVI through CB in patients with paroxysmal AF with a class I indication. Indeed, in the long-term follow-up (36 months) of the EARLY-AF trial, CB had a lower incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation episodes compared to the anti-arrhythmic drugs group. We now review the current best practices in an effort to drive consistent outcomes and minimize complications. PV isolation through CB is the most studied single-shot technique for atrial fibrillation ablation, having shown the potential to alter the natural history of the arrhythmia. Several procedural tips and tricks can improve procedural flow and effectiveness. In the present article we provided not only technical details but measurable biophysical parameters that can reliably guide the operator into achieving the best outcome for his patients.

Risk factors for late reconnections after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation guided by lesion size index - Data from repeat invasive electrophysiology procedure

Background

Late reconnections (LR) of pulmonary veins (PVs) after wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) using point-to-point radiofrequency (RF) ablation are common. Lesion size index (LSI) is a novel marker of lesion quality proposed by Ensite Precision mapping system, expected to improve PV isolation durability. This study aimed to assess the durability of LSI-guided PVI and the risk factors for LR of PVs.

Methods

The prospective study included 33 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who underwent (1) the index LSI-guided WACA procedure (with target LSI of 5.5-6.0 for anterior and 5.0-5.5 for posterior WACA segments) and (2) the 3-month protocol-mandated re-mapping procedure in all patients, irrespective of AF recurrence after the index procedure. Ablation parameters reported by Ensite mapping system were collected retrospectively. The inter-lesion distance (ILD) between all adjacent WACA lesions was calculated off-line. Association between index ablation parameters and the LRs of PVs at 3 months was analyzed.

Results

The median patient age was 61 (IQR: 53-64) years and 55% of them were males. At index procedure, the first-pass WACA isolation rate was higher for the left PVs than the right PVs (64 vs. 33%, p = 0.014). In addition, a low acute reconnection rates were observed, as follows: in 12.1% of patients, in 6.1% of WACA circles, in 3.8% of WACA segments and in 4.5% of PVs. However, the 3-month remapping study revealed LR of PV in 63.6% of patients, 37.9% of WACA circles, 20.5% of WACA segments and 26.5% of PVs. The LRs were identified mostly along the left anterior WACA segment. Independent risk factors for the LR of WACA were left-sided WACA location (OR 3.216 [95%CI: 1.065-9.716], p = 0.038) and longer ILD (OR 1.256 [95%CI: 1.035-1.523] for each 1-mm increase, p = 0.021). The ILD of > 8.0 mm showed a predictive value for the LR of WACA, with the sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 46%. A single case of cardiac tamponade occurred following the re-mapping invasive procedure. No other complications were encountered.

Conclusion

Although the LSI-guided PVI ensures a consistent PVI during the index procedure, LRs of PVs are still common. Besides the LSI, the PVI durability requires an optimal ILD between adjacent lesions, especially along the anterior lateral ridge.

Jet Ventilation Reduces Coronary Sinus Movement in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Observational Crossover Study

BACKGROUND

One of the reasons that high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is used is due to the near immobility of thoracic structures. However, no study has quantified the movements of cardiac structures during HFJV compared with normal mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

After ethical approval and written informed consent, we included 21 patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation ablation in this prospective crossover study. Each patient was ventilated with both normal mechanical ventilation and HFJV. During each ventilation mode, displacements of the cardiac structure were measured by the EnSite Precision mapping system using a catheter placed in the coronary sinus.

RESULTS

The median [Q1-Q4] displacement was 2.0 [0.6-2.8] mm during HFJV and 10.5 [9.3-13.0] mm during conventional ventilation (p < 0.000001).

CONCLUSION

This study quantifies the minimal movement of cardiac structures during HFJV compared to standard mechanical ventilation.

Anesthetic Considerations in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Comprehensive Review

Catheter ablation procedures for arrhythmias or implantation and/or extraction of cardiac pacemakers can present many clinical challenges. It is imperative that there is clear communication and understanding between the anesthesiologist and electrophysiologist during the perioperative period regarding the mode of ventilation, hemodynamic considerations, and various procedural complications. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the anesthetic techniques and considerations for catheter ablation procedures, ventilatory modes using techniques such as high-frequency jet ventilation, and strategies such as esophageal deviation and luminal temperature monitoring to decrease the risk of esophageal injury during catheter ablation. Various hemodynamic considerations, such as the intraprocedural triaging of cardiac tamponade and fluid administration during catheter ablation, also are discussed. Finally, this review briefly highlights the early research findings on pulse-field ablation, a new and evolving ablation modality.

Anesthetic Management and Considerations for Electrophysiology Procedures

The number of electrophysiology (EP) procedures being performed has dramatically increased in recent years. This escalation necessitates a full understanding by the general anesthesiologist as to the risks, specific considerations, and comorbidities that accompany these now common procedures. Procedures reviewed in this article include atrial fibrillation and flutter ablation, supraventricular tachycardia ablation, ventricular tachycardia ablation, electrical cardioversion, pacemaker insertion, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion, and ICD lead extraction. General anesthetic considerations as well as procedure-specific concerns are discussed. Knowledge of these procedures will add to the anesthesiologist's armamentarium in safely caring for patients in the EP laboratory.

Mechanism and management of atrial fibrillation in the patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disorder in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although there has been an increase in the incidence of AF due to the aging population, it has been reported that OSA is still underdiagnosed because many patients remain asymptomatic or unaware of the symptoms associated with OSA, such as daytime sleepiness. Untreated OSA reduces the effectiveness of AF treatment, regardless of pharmacological or non-pharmacological modes of therapy, such as catheter ablation. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that OSA pathophysiology is multifactorial, comprising of hypoxemia, hypercapnia, autonomic dysfunction, negative intrathoracic pressure changes, and arousals of OSA, and lead to AF. Both the acute and long-term effects of obstructive apnea episodes are involved in the development of an arrhythmogenic substrate of AF. Undiagnosed OSA causes underutilized opportunities for more effective AF management. Therefore, it is important to screen for OSA in all patients being considered for rhythm control therapy. However, regardless of the growing evidence of the negative prognostic impact of OSA, there is a lack of awareness regarding this connection not only among patients but also among cardiologists and arrhythmia specialists. There is a barrier to performing a systemic screening for OSA in clinical practice. Therefore, it is important to establish a comprehensive OSA care team for the efficient diagnosis and treatment of OSA. This review provides the current understanding of OSA and its relationship to AF and the importance of the diagnosis and management of OSA in AF.

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Approach to Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Prolonged Apneic Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Improved ablation catheter-tissue contact results in more effective ablation lesions. Respiratory motion causes catheter instability, which impacts durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel ablation strategy involving prolonged periods of apneic oxygenation during PVI.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective controlled study of 128 patients (mean age 63 ± 11 years; 37% women) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI. Patients underwent PVI under general anesthesia using serial 4-minute runs of apneic oxygenation (apnea group; n = 64) or using standard ventilation settings (control group; n = 64). Procedural data, arterial blood gas samples, catheter position coordinates, and ablation lesion characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. Catheter stability was significantly improved in the apnea group, as reflected by a decreased mean catheter displacement (1.55 ± 0.97 mm vs 2.25 ± 1.13 mm; P < 0.001) and contact force SD (4.9 ± 1.1 g vs 5.2 ± 1.5 g; P = 0.046). The percentage of lesions with a mean catheter displacement >2 mm was significantly lower in the apnea group (22% vs 44%; P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the total ablation time to achieve PVI was reduced in the apnea group (18.8 ± 6.9 minutes vs 23.4 ± 7.8 minutes; P = 0.001). There were similar rates of first-pass PVI, acute PV reconnections and dormant PV reconnections between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel strategy of performing complete PVI during apneic oxygenation results in improved catheter stability and decreased ablation times without adverse events. (Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Under Apnea; NCT04170894).

What have we learned so far from the sex/gender issue in heart failure? An overview of current evidence

There are important differences in epidemiology, pathophysiology, HF patterns, prognosis, and treatment. Women have a higher incidence of HFpEF due to sex-specific factors (such as anthropometry, role of estrogens, pregnancy-related cardiomyopathies), increased incidence of comorbidities, and gender-specific conditions. Men instead present a predisposition to the development of HFrEF due to a higher incidence of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. However, there are still gaps in the management of women with HF. The poor inclusion of women in clinical trials may have contributed to a lesser understanding of disease behavior than in men. In addition, a full understanding of gender-specific factors that are studied in small populations is lacking in the literature, and only in recent years, studies have increased their focus on this issue. Understanding how society, family, and environment affect the prognosis of HF patients may help clinicians provide more appropriate levels of care. In this overview, we aimed at summarizing all the key available evidence regarding sex/gender differences in heart failure.

Holding Still for AF Ablation

Appropriate procedural sedation is imperative to successful catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Monitored Anesthesia Care vs General Anesthesia

Introduction

Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia (GA) can be used during catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, each approach may have advantages and disadvantages with variability in operator preferences. The optimal approach has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to compare procedural efficacy, safety, clinical outcomes, and cost of CA for AF performed with MAC versus GA.

Methods

The study population consisted of 810 consecutive patients (mean age: 63 ± 10 years, paroxysmal AF: 48%) who underwent a first CA for AF. All patients completed a preprocedural evaluation by the anesthesiologists. Among the 810 patients, MAC was used in 534 (66%) and GA in 276 (34%). Ten patients (1.5%) had to convert to GA during the CA.

Results

Although the total anesthesia care was longer with GA particularly in patients with persistent AF, CA was shorter by 5 min with GA than MAC (p < 0.01). Prevalence of perioperative complications was similar between the two groups (4% vs. 4%, p = 0.89). There was no atrioesophageal fistula with either approach. GA was associated with a small, ~7% increase in total charges due to longer anesthesia care. During 43 ± 17 months of follow‐up after a single ablation procedure, 271/534 patients (51%) in the MAC and 129/276 (47%) patients in the GA groups were in sinus rhythm without concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy (p = 0.28).

Conclusion

With the participation of an anesthesiologist, and proper preoperative assessment, CA of AF using GA or MAC has similar efficacy and safety.

Comparison of the Different Anesthesia Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Catheter ablation has become a widely applied intervention for treating symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), which can be performed under general anesthesia (GA), deep sedation, or conscious sedation (CS). But the strategy of anesthesia remains controversial.

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the advantages of GA/deep sedation and CS in AF catheter ablation, including procedural parameters and clinical outcomes.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to November 2021 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed the outcomes of catheter ablation under GA/deep sedation or CS. Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis after screening with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated by the I² index and the Cochran Q test, respectively; sensitivity analysis including meta-regression was performed if heterogeneity was high. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger' test.

Results

This meta-analysis found GA/deep sedation to be associated with a lower recurrence rate of AF catheter ablation (p=0.03). In terms of procedural parameters, there was no significant difference between the two groups for the procedural time (p=0.35) and the fluoroscopy time (p=0.60), while the ablation time was shorter in the GA/deep sedation group (p=0.008). The total complication rate and the incidence of serious adverse events were statistically insignificant between the two groups (p=0.07 and p=0.94). Meta-regression did not suggest any covariates as an influential factor for procedural parameters and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

GA/deep sedation may reduce the risk of recurrence after AF ablation without increasing the incidence of complications. GA/deep sedation shortens the ablation duration, although there is no statistical difference in other procedural parameters between GA/deep sedation and CS.