Evolution of clinical diagnosis in patients presenting with unexplained cardiac arrest or syncope due to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: is it a case for genetic testing?

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is a diagnosis of exclusion in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) survivors. Although there are clear guidelines on the clinical work-up of SCA survivors, less than one in five patients receives a complete work-up. This increases the chances of erroneously labelling these patients as having IVF, while 10-20% of them have an inherited cardiac condition (ICC). Diagnoses of ICC increase over time due to (additional) deep phenotyping or as a result of spontaneous expression of ICC over time. As SCA survivors can also harbor (likely) pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes in the absence of a phenotype, or can have another ICC without a clear cardiac phenotype, the question arises as to whether genetic testing in this group should be routinely performed. Family history (mainly in the case of sudden death) can increase suspicion of an ICC in an SCA victim, but does not add great value when adults underwent a complete cardiological work-up. The diagnosis of ICC has treatment consequences not only for the patient but also for their family. Genetic diagnostic yield does not appear to increase with larger gene panels, but variants of unknown significance (VUS) do. Although VUS can be confusing, careful and critical segregation analysis in the family can be performed when discussed in a multidisciplinary team at a center of expertise with at least a cardiologist as well as a clinical and laboratory geneticist, thereby degrading or promoting VUS. When to introduce genetic testing in SCA survivors remains a matter of debate, but the combination of quick, deep phenotyping with additional genetic testing for the unidentifiable phenotypes, especially in the young, seems preferable.

Short-Coupled Ventricular Fibrillation

Short-coupled ventricular fibrillation (SCVF) is a distinct phenotype among individuals with unexplained cardiac arrest accounting for 7% to 14% of cases of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). VF is typically initiated by a trigger premature ventricular contraction with a short-coupling interval of less than 350 milliseconds. In the absence of specific electrocardiographic features or provocative tests, the diagnosis remains challenging and requires documentation of VF onset. Most cases are diagnosed during follow-up at the time of VF recurrence. SCVF is characterized by a high risk of VF recurrence. Insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and quinidine are the keystones of SCVF management.

Genetics in Probands With Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Different genes have been associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF); however, there are no studies correlating genotype with phenotype.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to define the genetic background of probands with IVF using large gene panel analysis and to correlate genetics with long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

All consecutive probands with a diagnosis of IVF were included in a multicenter retrospective study. All patients had: 1) IVF diagnosis throughout the follow-up; and 2) genetic analysis with a broad gene panel. All genetic variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P+), variants of unknown significance (VUS) or no variants (NO-V), following current guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. The primary endpoint was occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA).

RESULTS

Forty-five consecutive patients were included. A variant was found in 12 patients, 3 P+ and 9 VUS carriers. After a mean follow-up time of 105.0 months, there were no deaths and 16 patients (35.6%) experienced a VA. NO-V patients had higher VA free survival during the follow-up, compared with both VUS (72.7% vs 55.6%, log-rank P < 0.001) and P+ (72.7% vs 0%, log-rank P = 0.013). At Cox analysis, P+ or VUS carrier status was a predictor of VA occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In probands with IVF, undergoing genetic analysis with a broad panel, the diagnostic yield for P+ is 6.7%. P+ or VUS carrier status is a predictor of VA occurrence.

Latent Causes of Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Inherited arrhythmia syndromes are a common cause of apparently unexplained cardiac arrest or sudden cardiac death. These include long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome, with a well-recognized phenotype in most patients with sufficiently severe disease to lead to cardiac arrest. Less common and typically less apparent conditions that may not be readily evident include catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, short QT syndrome and early repolarization syndrome. In cardiac arrest patients whose extensive testing does not reveal an underlying etiology, a diagnosis of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation or short-coupled ventricular fibrillation is assigned. This review summarizes our current understanding of the less common inherited arrhythmia syndromes and provides clinicians with a practical approach to diagnosis and management.

Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the Paediatric Population

Sudden cardiac arrest in the young is a rare event with a range of potential causes including cardiomyopathies, ion channelopathies, and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Investigations into the cause involve a multidisciplinary team, including cardiologists, geneticists, and psychologists. In addition to a detailed medical history, family history and circumstances surrounding the event are important in determining the cause. Clinical investigations including an electrocardiogram are fundamental in diagnosis and should be interpreted cautiously because some children may have atypical presentations and an evolving phenotype. The potential for misdiagnosis exists that could lead to incorrect long-term management strategies. If an inherited condition is suspected, genetic testing of the patient and cascade screening of family members is recommended with genetic counselling and psychological support. Medical management is left to the treating physician acknowledging that a clear diagnosis cannot be made in approximately half of cases. Secondary prevention implantable defibrillators are widely deployed but can be associated with complications in young patients. A plan for safe return to activity is recommended along with a proper transition of care into adulthood. Broad screening of the general population for arrhythmia syndromes is not recommended; preventative measures include screening paediatric patients for risk factors by their primary care physician. Several milestone events or activities that take place in youth could be used as opportunities to promote safety. Further work into risk stratification of this paediatric population through patient registries and greater awareness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use in saving lives is warranted.

Genetics and genomics of arrhythmic risk: current and future strategies to prevent sudden cardiac death

A genetic risk of sudden cardiac arrest and sudden death due to an arrhythmic cause, known as sudden cardiac death (SCD), has become apparent from epidemiological studies in the general population and in patients with ischaemic heart disease. However, genetic susceptibility to sudden death is greatest in young people and is associated with uncommon, monogenic forms of heart disease. Despite comprehensive pathology and genetic evaluations, SCD remains unexplained in a proportion of young people and is termed sudden arrhythmic death syndrome, which poses challenges to the identification of relatives from affected families who might be at risk of SCD. In this Review, we assess the current understanding of the epidemiology and causes of SCD and evaluate both the monogenic and the polygenic contributions to the risk of SCD in the young and SCD associated with drug therapy. Finally, we analyse the potential clinical role of genomic testing in the prevention of SCD in the general population.

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: the ongoing quest for diagnostic refinement

Prior to the recognition of distinct clinical entities, such as Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and long QT syndrome, all sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) survivors with ventricular fibrillation (VF) and apparently structurally normal hearts were labelled as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). Over the last three decades, the definition of IVF has changed substantially, mostly as result of the identification of the spectrum of SCA-predisposing genetic heart diseases (GHDs), and the molecular evidence, by post-mortem genetic analysis (aka, the molecular autopsy), of cardiac channelopathies as the pathogenic basis for up to 35% of unexplained cases of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young. The evolution of the definition of IVF over time has led to a progressively greater awareness of the need for an extensive diagnostic assessment in unexplained SCA survivors. Nevertheless, GHDs are still underdiagnosed among SCA survivors, due to the underuse of pharmacological challenges (i.e. sodium channel blocker test), misrecognition of electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities/patterns (i.e. early repolarization pattern or exercise-induced ventricular bigeminy) or errors in the measurement of ECG parameters (e.g. the heart-rate corrected QT interval). In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, diagnostic approaches, and the controversies related to role of the genetic background in unexplained SCA survivors with a default diagnosis of IVF.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in patients with normal electrocardiograms: results from a multicentre long-term registry

AIMS 

To define the clinical characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes of a large cohort of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and normal 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with ventricular fibrillation as the presenting rhythm, normal baseline, and follow-up ECGs with no signs of cardiac channelopathy including early repolarization or atrioventricular conduction abnormalities, and without structural heart disease were included in a registry. A total of 245 patients (median age: 38 years; males 59%) were recruited from 25 centres. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 226 patients (92%), while 18 patients (8%) were treated with drug therapy only. Over a median follow-up of 63 months (interquartile range: 25-110 months), 12 patients died (5%); in four of them (1.6%) the lethal event was of cardiac origin. Patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs only had a higher rate of cardiovascular death compared to patients who received an ICD (16% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.001). Fifty-two patients (21%) experienced an arrhythmic recurrence. Age ≤16 years at the time of the first ventricular arrhythmia was the only predictor of arrhythmic recurrence on multivariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.92; P = 0.03].

CONCLUSION 

Patients with IVF and persistently normal ECGs frequently have arrhythmic recurrences, but a good prognosis when treated with an ICD. Children are a category of IVF patients at higher risk of arrhythmic recurrences.

Life-long tailoring of diagnosis and management of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation-future perspectives in research

The diagnosis and management of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is challenging, as it requires extensive diagnostic testing and offers few curative options due to unknown underlying disease. The resulting population is a heterogeneous group of patients with a largely unknown natural history. Structural patient characterisation, follow-up and innovations in diagnostic testing can improve our understanding of the disease mechanisms of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, detect underlying disease during follow-up and aid in therapeutic management. Recently, initiatives have been launched in the Netherlands to investigate the role of high-resolution non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging and genetic and familial screening in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.

Characteristics and clinical assessment of unexplained sudden cardiac arrest in the real-world setting: focus on idiopathic ventricular fibrillation

Aims

Recent studies have shown that in more than half of apparently unexplained sudden cardiac arrests (SCA), a specific aetiology can be unmasked by a careful evaluation. The characteristics and the extent to which such cases undergo a systematic thorough investigation in real-life practice are unknown.

Methods and results

Data were analysed from an ongoing study, collecting all cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Paris area. Investigations performed during the index hospitalization or planned after discharge were gathered to evaluate the completeness of assessment of unexplained SCA. Between 2011 and 2016, among the 18 622 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 717 survivors (at hospital discharge) fulfilled the definition of cardiac SCA. Of those, 88 (12.3%) remained unexplained after electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and coronary angiography. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging yielded the diagnosis in 25 (3.5%) cases, other investigations accounted for 14 (2.4%) additional diagnoses, and 49 (6.8%) patients were labelled as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) (48.7 ± 15 years, 69.4% male). Among those labelled IVF, only 8 (16.3%) cases benefited from a complete workup (including pharmacological testing). Younger patients [odds ratio (OR) 6.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-22.26] and those admitted to university centres (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.12-12.45) were more thoroughly investigated. Genetic testing and family screening were initiated in only 9 (18.4%) and 12 (24.5%) cases, respectively.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that complete investigations are carried out in a very low proportion of unexplained SCA. Standardized, systematic approaches need to be implemented to ensure that opportunities for specific therapies and preventive strategies (including relatives) are not missed.

The accessibility and utilization of genetic testing for inherited heart rhythm disorders: a Canadian cross-sectional survey study

The genetic basis of many sudden death-related conditions has been elucidated. These include inherited arrhythmias and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, termed inherited heart rhythm disorders (IHRD). Advising on and interpreting genetic testing is challenging for the general cardiologist. This has led to the development of interdisciplinary clinics for IHRD in varying stages of establishment in Canada. We sought the viewpoints and patterns of practice of Canadian IHRD experts, and assessed their ability to access genetic testing for IHRD using a national cross-sectional survey. Of 56 participants, most were physicians (68%) or genetic counselors (19%). Despite working collaboratively, most genetic counselors (59%) were either not satisfied or only somewhat satisfied with their relationships with physicians. Ninety percent of participants were involved in offering genetic evaluation, including 80% who felt that testing was usually/always accessible. Most offered genetic testing to confirm clinical diagnosis and/or direct family screening. Post-mortem genetic analysis was sought by 69% of respondents; however, a lack of retained tissue and/or poor tissue preparation hindered this process. Family screening was usually recommended in the setting of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. The most commonly perceived barrier to genetic testing was cost to the healthcare system. More than a quarter of patients waited ≥ 6 months for funding. An ability to engage at-risk relatives was rated as limited/poor by 34% of participants. Despite the establishment of several interdisciplinary clinics, timely access to affordable testing, supported by strong team communication, continues to be a barrier to genetic testing in Canada.

[Sudden cardiac death: A better understanting for a better prevention]

Sudden cardiac death is defined as a natural and unexpected death, in a previous apparently healthy individual. It represents a major public health issue, with up to 50% of the cardiovascular mortality. Using data from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Centre registry, this article summarises the main cardiovascular abnormalities associated with sudden cardiac death, the different preventives approaches, and provides a systematic diagnostic approach.

Next-generation sequencing of a large gene panel in patients initially diagnosed with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is a rare primary cardiac arrhythmia syndrome that is diagnosed in a resuscitated cardiac arrest victim, with documented ventricular fibrillation, in whom no underlying cause is identified after comprehensive clinical evaluation. In some patients, causative genetic mutations are detected that facilitate patient treatment and follow-up. The feasibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has increased with its greater availability and decreasing costs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of NGS in patients with IVF.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients initially diagnosed with IVF were included (mean age 53 ± 15 years; 14(42%) men). In all included patients, NGS of 33 genes and the DPP6 haplotype revealed no pathogenic mutations. Genetic screening comprised NGS of a panel of 179 additional genes. Variants with a minor allele frequency of <0.05% were assessed for pathogenicity by using existing mutation databases and in silico predictive algorithms.

RESULTS

In 1 of 33 patients, a likely pathogenic mutation was detected. The added yield of genetic testing with NGS of 179 additional genes is 3% in patients with IVF. In 15% of patients, 1 or multiple variants of uncertain clinical significance were detected.

CONCLUSION

The added yield of genetic screening of extended NGS panels in patients initially diagnosed with IVF is minimal. Routine analysis of large diagnostic NGS panels is therefore not recommended.

Cost Analysis of Patients Referred for Inherited Heart Rhythm Disorder Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Inherited heart rhythm disorders (IHRDs) are complex and uncommon arrhythmogenic conditions that can lead to sudden unexpected death in seemingly healthy individuals. Multidisciplinary programs can assist in the diagnostic testing of potentially affected individuals and their family members.

METHODS

Patients evaluated in a specialized adult and pediatric IHRD clinic between April 2013 and February 2015 were characterized. The total costs per evaluation and diagnosis were calculated. Patients were divided according to referral indication (primary referral or family member).

RESULTS

A total of 618 patients were evaluated (age 36 ± 21 years; 52% male), of which 274 (44%) were primary referrals and 344 (56%) were family members referred for cascade screening. Overall, 47% had at least 1 follow-up visit. Patients had a median of 3 tests; primary referrals required more tests (4 vs 2; P < 0.01). The median cost per patient was $1340 CAD. Evaluation of the primary referrals was costlier than family members ($3096 vs $983; P < 0.01). A definite or probable diagnosis was determined in 464 patients (77%), with no difference according to patient type (P = 0.18). The total cost per diagnosis was $4021 in primary referrals compared with $1277 in family members (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical evaluation of patients with suspected IHRD results in a high diagnostic yield and costs aligned with other complex disorders involving multidisciplinary clinics. Evaluation costs are expectedly higher in primary referrals compared with targeted family screening.

Long-Term Outcome of Patients Initially Diagnosed With Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation

Background—

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is a rare cause of sudden cardiac arrest. Limited data are available on the long-term outcome of IVF patients.

Methods and Results—

In this retrospective cohort study, 107 consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of IVF were analyzed (age at index event 40.4 years, 60% male). Missing diagnostic data were acquired during follow-up, including genetic testing, to exclude underlying disease. A specific diagnosis was revealed in 22 of 107 patients (21%) during a median follow-up of 10.2 years. Mortality rate was 9% in IVF patients (8/85). Appropriate implantable cardioverter–defibrillator therapy was delivered in 23 patients (29%) of 78 IVF patients with an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator, with a median of 3 appropriate shocks per patient.

Conclusions—

One fifth of the patients initially diagnosed with IVF reveal a specific diagnosis during long-term follow-up. Additional diagnostic testing, including genetic testing, contributes to the detection of specific diseases. The recurrence rate of ventricular arrhythmias in IVF patients is high. Our data show the importance of thorough follow-up and reassessment of diagnosis in IVF patients.

Cardiac Abnormalities in First-Degree Relatives of Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Victims

Background—

Unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) may be explained by inherited arrhythmia syndromes. The Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry prospectively assessed first-degree relatives of UCA or sudden unexplained death victims to screen for cardiac abnormalities.

Methods and Results—

Around 398 first-degree family members (186 UCA, 212 sudden unexplained death victims’ relatives; mean age, 44±17 years) underwent extensive cardiac workup, including ECG, signal averaged ECG, exercise testing, cardiac imaging, Holter-monitoring, and selective provocative drug testing with epinephrine or procainamide. Genetic testing was performed when a mutation was identified in the UCA survivor or when the diagnostic workup revealed a phenotype suggestive of a specific inherited arrhythmia syndrome. The diagnostic strength was classified as definite, probable, or possible based on previously published definitions. Cardiac abnormalities were detected in 120 of 398 patients (30.2%) with 67 of 398 having a definite or probable diagnosis (17%), including Long-QT syndrome (13%), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (4%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (4%), and Brugada syndrome (3%). The detection yield was similar for family members of UCA and sudden unexplained death victims (31% versus 27%; P =0.59). Genetic testing was performed more often in family members of UCA patients (29% versus 20%; P =0.03). Disease-causing mutations were identified in 20 of 398 relatives (5%). The most common pathogenic mutations were RyR2 (2%), SCN5A (1%), and KNCQ1 (0.8%).

Conclusions—

Cardiac screening revealed abnormalities in 30% of first-degree relatives of UCA or sudden unexplained death victims, with a clear working diagnosis in 17%. Long-QT, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia were the most common diagnoses. Systematic cascade screening and genetic testing in asymptomatic individuals will lead to preventive lifestyle and medical interventions with potential to prevent sudden cardiac death.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00292032.

Sudden cardiac death: A reappraisal

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is still among the leading causes of death in women and men, accounting for over 50% of all fatal cardiovascular events in the United States. Two arrhythmia mechanisms of SCD can be distinguished as follows: shockable rhythms (ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia) and non-shockable rhythms including asystole or pulseless electrical activity. The overall prognosis of cardiac arrest due to shockable rhythms is significantly better. While the majority of SCDs is attributed to coronary artery disease or other structural heart disease, no obvious cause can be identified in 5% of all events, and those events are labeled as sudden unexplained deaths (SUD). Those unexplained events are typically caused by rare hereditary electrical disorders or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. A systematic approach to the diagnosis of cardiac arrest followed by tailored therapy based on etiology has emerged in the last 10-15 years, with significant changes of medical practice and risk management of cardiac arrest victims. The aim of this review is to summarize our contemporary understanding of SCD/SUD in adults and to discuss current concepts of management and secondary prevention in cardiac arrest victims. A full discussion of the topic of primary prevention of SCD is beyond the scope of this article.

Clinical evaluation of unselected cardiac arrest survivors in a tertiary center over a 1-year period (the LAZARUZ study)

OBJECTIVES

When the cause of an aborted cardiac arrest is unclear the initiation of therapy, counseling and family screening is challenging.

METHODS

We included 43 unselected, prospectively identified cardiac arrest survivors with or without a diagnosis. Family history for cardiac disease and supplemental electrocardiograms were evaluated for additional diagnostic information.

RESULTS

43 cardiac arrest survivors were included, 34 (79%) were male and the average age was 48years (range 23-64, SD 13.0). The most common etiologies identified in cardiac arrest survivors were ischemic heart disease (33%), cardiomyopathies (14%), miscellaneous (e.g. drug induced arrhythmias, coronary spasms) (12%) and channelopathies (5%). Family history of cardiac disease - even inheritable conditions - was not indicative of etiology in cardiac arrest survivors. Supplemental ECGs were abnormal in 10 of 43 patients; in the majority of these patients (7) no conclusive diagnosis was reached.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study 16/43 (37%) of unselected, prospectively included cardiac arrest survivors remained without a diagnosis despite exhaustive investigations. We may extract additional diagnostic information from simple maneuvers during the recording of the electrocardiogram. We suggest that these ECG derived clues be investigated in future studies including genetic test results and data from relatives.

Outcome of Apparently Unexplained Cardiac Arrest: Results From Investigation and Follow-Up of the Prospective Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry

BACKGROUND

The Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER) enrolls patients with apparently unexplained cardiac arrest and no evident cardiac disease to identify the pathogenesis of cardiac arrest through systematic clinical testing. Exercise testing, drug provocation, advanced cardiac imaging, and genetic testing may be useful when a cause is not apparent.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The first 200 survivors of unexplained cardiac arrest from 14 centers across Canada were evaluated to determine the results of investigation and follow-up (age, 48.6±14.7 years, 41% female). Patients were free of evidence of coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, or evident repolarization syndromes. Advanced testing determined a diagnosis in 34% of patients at baseline, with a diagnosis emerging during follow-up in 7% of patients. Of those who were diagnosed, 28 (35%) had an underlying structural condition and 53 (65%) had a primary electric disease. During a mean follow-up of 3.15±2.34 years, 23% of patients had either a shock or an appropriate antitachycardia pacing from their implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or both. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator appropriate intervention rate was 8.4% at 1 year and 18.1% at 3 years, with no clear difference between diagnosed and undiagnosed subjects, or between those diagnosed with a primary electric versus structural pathogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining a diagnosis in previously unexplained cardiac arrest patients requires systematic clinical testing and regular follow-up to unmask the cause. Nearly half of apparently unexplained cardiac arrest patients ultimately received a diagnosis, allowing for improved treatment and family screening. A substantial proportion of patients received appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy during medium-term follow-up.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00292032.

Long-Term Outcome of Patients With Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcome of the patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is not well known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Relevant studies published through May 21, 2014 were searched and identified in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases and a hand search of article references was also performed. Random-effect models were used for pooling proportions of mortality and recurrent events. Twenty-three studies were included with a total of 639 patients (449 males) with a mean age ranging from 33 to 51 years. Eighty percent of patients had received ICD implantation. Over an average of 5.3 years follow-up, 167 patients (31%) experienced a recurrence of ventricular arrhythmic events (proportion, 0.29 [95% CI 0.21-0.38]). Moreover, 17 patients (3.1%) died among all studies (proportion, 0.01 [95% CI 0.00-0.04]). No association was found between the induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation at baseline electrophysiological study and risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (risk difference: 0.12 [95% CI, 0.08-0.32]).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IVF, this meta-analysis revealed an estimated recurrent event rate of 31% and a pooled mortality rate of 3.1% during an average of 5 years follow-up. The results of baseline electrophysiological studies are not predictive of future ventricular arrhythmias.

Arrythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) and cathecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT): A phenotypic spectrum seen in same patient

ARVD/C and CPVT are rare inheritable sudden cardiac death syndromes predominantly expressed in younger individuals. ARVD/C is characterized by a progressive fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium that predisposes to ventricular tachycardia while CPVT is characterized by exercise induced bidirectional/polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and a structurally normal heart. A mutation in different genes causes these syndromes but recently, mutation in a common gene RYR2 has been associated with both disorders and it has been suggested that CPVT and ARVD/C represent a phenotypic spectrum. We present a case unique in expressing both these phenotypes.