The impact of histopathologic examination of graft-versus-host disease in the era of reduced-intensity conditioning regimen: a study from the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo

A biomarker signature to predict complete response to itacitinib and corticosteroids in acute graft-versus-host disease

A broad proteomic analysis was conducted to identify and evaluate candidate biomarkers potentially predictive of response to treatment with an oral selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, itacitinib, in acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). Plasma samples from 25 participants (identification cohort; NCT02614612) were used to identify novel biomarkers that were tested in a validation cohort from a placebo‐controlled, randomised trial (n = 210; NCT03139604). The identification cohort received corticosteroids plus 200 or 300 mg itacitinib once daily. The validation cohort received corticosteroids plus 200 mg itacitinib once daily or placebo. A broad proteomic analysis was conducted using a proximity extension assay. Baseline and longitudinal comparisons were performed with unpaired t‐test and one‐way analysis of variance used to evaluate biomarker level changes. Seven candidate biomarkers were identified. Monocyte‐chemotactic protein (MCP)3, pro‐calcitonin/calcitonin (ProCALCA/CALCA), together with a previously identified prognostic acute GVHD biomarker, regenerating islet‐derived protein (REG)3A, stratified complete responders from non‐responders (participants with progressive disease) to itacitinib, but not placebo, potentially representing predictive biomarkers of itacitinib in acute GVHD. ProCALCA/CALCA, suppressor of tumorigenicity (ST)2, and tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)1 were significantly reduced over time by itacitinib in responders, potentially representing response‐to‐treatment biomarkers. Novel biomarkers have the potential to identify patients with acute GVHD that may respond to itacitinib plus corticosteroid treatment (NCT02614612; NCT03139604).

Real-Time Reflectance Confocal Microscopy of Cutaneous Graft-versus-Host Disease Correlates with Histopathology

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) allows noninvasive, real-time evaluation of the skin at a resolution akin to histopathology (HP), but its application in cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has not been extensively assessed. We describe RCM features of cutaneous GVHD including acute (aGVHD), late acute, chronic (cGVHD; sclerotic and nonsclerotic subtypes), and inactive GVHD and correlate RCM with same-site HP for a subset of patients. Thirty-two adult and pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients with cutaneous GVHD received RCM imaging of ≥1 lesions (n = 44), 13 of which necessitated skin biopsy. RCM images were deidentified and assessed by 2 RCM experts blinded to clinical and HP findings to reach a consensus on the features and patterns of the inflammatory dermatoses. Major RCM features (present in ≥65% of lesional sites) and patterns were reported. To determine the correlation between RCM and HP, detection of cellular features and patterns of inflammatory dermatoses were compared using percent agreement and prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted kappa estimates. Seven patients with early or late aGVHD (7 lesions) had irregular honeycombing, spongiosis, dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) and dermal inflammation, and melanophages; those with early aGVHD also had hyperkeratosis, dilated vessels, and coarse connective tissue. Both groups had an interface dermatitis pattern. Eighteen patients with nonsclerotic cGVHD (24 lesions) had irregular honeycombing, spongiosis, DEJ and dermal inflammation, dilated vessels, coarse connective tissue, and interface and spongiotic dermatitis patterns. Three sclerotic patients with cGVHD (7 lesions) had irregular honeycombing, DEJ and dermal inflammation with an interface dermatitis pattern. Four patients with inactive GVHD (6 lesions) showed minimal inflammation. RCM and HP had similar detection rates for 6 of 13 features and overall patterns important for diagnosis in 2 patients with late aGVHD (2 lesions; 15%) and 10 with nonsclerotic cGVHD (11 lesions; 85%) necessitating skin biopsy. RCM can detect features commonly reported in cutaneous GVHD and is comparable to HP. Additional characterization of cutaneous GVHD by RCM may enable future use in diagnosing, monitoring, or predicting disease in real time.

Graft Versus Host Disease After Intestinal Transplantation: A Single-center Experience

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon but highly morbid complication of intestinal transplantation (ITx). In this study, we reviewed our 17-y experience with GVHD focusing on factors predicting GVHD occurrence and survival.

Methods.

Retrospective review of 271 patients who received 1 or more ITx since program inception in 2003 with survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling.

Results.

Of 271 patients, 28 developed GHVD 34 (18–66) d after ITx presenting with rash or rash with fever in 26, rectosigmoid disease in 1, and hemolysis in 1; other sites, mainly rectosigmoid colon, were involved in 13. Initial skin biopsy demonstrated classic findings in 6, compatible findings in 14, and no abnormalities in 2. Additional sites of GVHD later emerged in 14. Of the 28 patients, 16 died largely from sepsis, the only independent hazard for death (hazard ratio [HR], 37.4181; P = 0.0008). Significant (P < 0.0500) independent hazards for occurrence of GVHD in adults were pre-ITx functional intestinal failure (IF) (HR, 15.2448) and non-IF diagnosis (HR, 20.9952) and early post-ITx sirolimus therapy (HR, 0.0956); independent hazards in children were non-IF diagnosis (HR, 4.3990), retransplantation (HR, 4.6401), donor:recipient age ratio (HR, 7.3190), and graft colon omission (HR, 0.1886). Variant transplant operation was not an independent GVHD hazard.

Conclusions.

Initial diagnosis of GVHD after ITx remains largely clinical, supported but not often confirmed by skin biopsy. Although GVHD risk is mainly recipient-driven, changes in donor selection and immunosuppression practice may reduce incidence and improve survival.

Acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut: considerations for the gastroenterologist

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is central to the management of many haematological disorders. A frequent complication of HSCT is acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a condition in which immune cells from the donor attack healthy recipient tissues. The gastrointestinal system is among the most common sites affected by acute GVHD, and severe manifestations of acute GVHD of the gut portends a poor prognosis in patients after HSCT. Acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract presents both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Although the clinical manifestations are nonspecific and overlap with those of infection and drug toxicity, diagnosis is ultimately based on clinical criteria. As reliable serum biomarkers have not yet been validated outside of clinical trials, endoscopic and histopathological evaluation continue to be utilized in diagnosis. Once a diagnosis of gastrointestinal acute GVHD is established, therapy with systemic corticosteroids is typically initiated, and non-responders can be treated with a wide range of second-line therapies. In addition to treating the underlying disease, the management of complications including profuse diarrhoea, severe malnutrition and gastrointestinal bleeding is paramount. In this Review, we discuss strategies for the diagnosis and management of acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract as they pertain to the practising gastroenterologist.

Histopathologic Features of Cutaneous Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in T-Cell-Depleted Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

T-cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation demonstrates similar efficacy and reduced incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in appropriately selected patients versus T-cell-replete transplantation. The histopathology of cutaneous acute GVHD (aGVHD) after TCD peripheral blood stem cell transplants (PBSCTs) is not described. We identified 13 cases of patients after TCD PBSCT, with definitive aGVHD, and 20 cases of non-aGVHD skin rash in patients after TCD PBSCT, during multidisciplinary review by a dermatopathologist, dermatologist, and transplant physician, incorporating clinical presentation, therapeutic response, and histopathology data. Histopathologic features of aGVHD and non-aGVHD skin rash in TCD PBSCT patients were compared to each other, and also to features recently reported for non-TCD transplant recipients. aGVHD and non-aGVHD skin rash in TCD PBSCT patients' biopsies had similar rates of epidermal acanthosis, dermal melanophages, neutrophils, plasma cells, eosinophils, and extravasated erythrocytes. While satellitosis, exocytosis and adnexal involvement slightly favored aGVHD, more notable differential findings favoring aGVHD were diffuse (vs. focal/absent) basal vacuolization (77% aGVHD vs. 25% non-aGVHD rash), involvement of the entire epidermis (vs. partial thickness) by necrotic keratinocytes (42% aGVHD vs. 0% non-aGVHD rash), and nondense (rather than exuberant) inflammatory infiltrates (77% vs. 20%). After filtering features seen in all TCD samples (epidermal acanthosis, dermal melanophages, neutrophils, plasma cells, eosinophils, and extravasated erythrocytes), the most distinct features belonging to aGVHD-positive TCD samples were diffuse basal vacuolization, slight rather than dense inflammatory infiltrates, and necrotic keratinocytes involving the entire epidermis. Awareness of these features may help when evaluating a skin rash occurring after a TCD transplant.

International, Multicenter Standardization of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Clinical Data Collection: A Report from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The clinical staging of GVHD varies greatly between transplant centers and is frequently not agreed on by independent reviewers. The lack of standardized approaches to handle common sources of discrepancy in GVHD grading likely contributes to why promising GVHD treatments reported from single centers have failed to show benefit in randomized multicenter clinical trials. We developed guidelines through international expert consensus opinion to standardize the diagnosis and clinical staging of GVHD for use in a large international GVHD research consortium. During the first year of use, the guidance followed discussion of complex clinical phenotypes by experienced transplant physicians and data managers. These guidelines increase the uniformity of GVHD symptom capture, which may improve the reproducibility of GVHD clinical trials after further prospective validation.