Serotonin expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors correlates with a trabecular histologic pattern and large duct involvement

Prognostic Features in Surgically Resected Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of 904 Patients with 7882 Person-Years of Follow-Up

Importance

The clinical behavior of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is difficult to predict.

Objective

To define more accurately prognosticators for patients with a surgically resected PanNET.

Design

The pathology and Ki-67 immunolabeling index of PanNETs resected from 904 patients was correlated with patient outcome.

Setting

Academic tertiary care hospital.

Participants

Consecutive patients who had a PanNET resected between 1985 and 2025.

Results

The mean patient age at surgery was 56.6 years (SD 14.0), 477 were male (52.8%), and 7882 person-years of follow-up were obtained (mean 8.8 years, SD 6.5). The 10-year survival was 81% (95% CI: 77,86%) for patients with G1 PanNETs (Ki-67 <3%), 68% (95% CI: 61,76%) for patients with G2a PanNETs (Ki-67 3- <10%), 44% (95% CI: 29,66%) for patients with G2b PanNETs (Ki-67 of 10%- ≤20%), and 23% (95% CI: 8,61%) for patients with G3 PanNETs. Metastases (HR 4.7, p <0.0001), vascular invasion (HR 3.0, p <0.0001), tumor size ≥ 2 cm (HR 2.88, p <0.0001), perineural invasion (HR 2.42, p<0.0001), and positive margins (HR 2.18, p <0.0001) were associated with worse overall survival. Insulinoma (HR 0.34, p=3e-04), sclerosing variant (HR 0.47, p=0.05), and cystic variant (HR 0.61, p=0.05) were associated with improved overall survival. T stage and N stage were all statistically significant classifiers of overall survival. Similar associations were found with respect to disease relapse. There was a significant (P<0.001) increase in the proportion of patients diagnosed with stage I vs stage IV disease over time.

Conclusions and relevance

This study supports the classification of PanNETs into four grades (G1, G2a, G2b, and G3) based on Ki-67 labeling, which allows a more accurate prognostic assessments of patients.

Diagnostic dilemma: a collision of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor G3 and adenocarcinoma with extensive fibrosis

An 82-year-old man presented with intermittent abdominal pain and elevated liver enzymes. Blood tests showed normal levels of tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, NSE). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) revealed a 20 mm hypovascular mass in the pancreatic head. Magnetic resonance imaging indicated low intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images and high intensity on diffusion-weighted images. Endoscopic ultrasonography visualized an irregular hypoechoic mass. Initially, it was diagnosed as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) based on imaging. Subsequent histopathological analysis via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration revealed a neuroendocrine tumor (NET). The preoperative diagnosis was changed to a pancreatic NET grade1. Consequently, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen unveiled a mixed tumor-NET-Grade1/Grade3 and invasive PDAC. No clear transition between the NETs and PDAC was observed. The high grade of NET with significant fibrosis contributed to decreased enhancement of CE-CT. Finally, we diagnosed this case as a pancreatic collision tumor involving both NET and PDAC components, with lymph node metastases attributed to the NET components. In this case, achieving an accurate preoperative diagnosis was challenging despite utilizing both imaging and biopsy diagnostics. This unique case underscores the difficulties encountered in the preoperative assessment of mixed tumors.

"Vascular tuft sign" in neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas

The often well-developed microvasculature in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) has been studied from different perspectives. However, some detailed structural findings have received less attention. Our objective is to study an overlooked event in PanNETs: "enclosed vascular tufts" (EVTs). For this purpose, 39 cases of PanNETs were examined with conventional (including serial sections) and immunochemistry procedures. In typical EVTs, the results show: 1) an insulated terminal vascular area, with a globular (glomeruloid) aspect, formed by a cluster of coiled microvessels, presenting CD31-, CD34-positive endothelial cells, αSMA-positive pericytes, and perivascular CD34-positive stromal cells/telocytes, separated by a pseudoglandular space from the surrounding trabeculae of tumor neuroendocrine cells; and 2) a pedicle joining the insulated terminal vascular area, with connective tissue tracts around the enclosing tumor trabeculae. EVTs predominate in the trabecular and nested gyriform pattern of PanNETs, with tumor trabeculae that follow a ribbon coil (winding ribbon pattern) around small vessels, which acquire a tufted image. In EVTs, secondary modifications may occur (fibrosis, hyalinization, myxoid changes, and calcification), coinciding or not with those of the connective tracts. In conclusion, the typical characteristics of unnoticed EVTs allow them to be considered as a morphological sign of PanNETs (a vascular tuft sign). Further in-depth studies are required, mainly to assess the molecular pathways that participate in vascular tuft formation and its pathophysiological implications.

ARX, PDX1, ISL1, and CDX2 Expression Distinguishes 5 Subgroups of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors With Correlations to Histology, Hormone Expression, and Outcome

Many pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) fall into 2 major prognostic subtypes based on DAXX/ATRX-induced alternative lengthening of telomerase phenotype and alpha- and beta-cell-like epigenomic profiles. However, these PanNETs are still flanked by other PanNETs that do not fit into either subtype. Furthermore, despite advanced genotyping, PanNETs are generally not well-characterized in terms of their histologic and hormonal phenotypes. We aimed to identify new subgroups of PanNETs by extending the currently used transcription factor signatures and investigating their correlation with histologic, hormonal, molecular, and prognostic findings. One hundred eighty-five PanNETs (nonfunctioning 165 and functioning 20), resected between 1996 and 2023, were classified into 5 subgroups (A1, A2, B, C, and D) by cluster analysis based on ARX, PDX1, islet-1 (ISL1), and CDX2 expressions and correlated with trabecular vs solid histology, expression of insulin, glucagon, polypeptide (PP), somatostatin, serotonin, gastrin, calcitonin, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), DAXX/ATRX, MEN1, and alternative lengthening of telomerase status by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and disease-free survival. A1 (46%, ARX+/ISL1+/PDX1-/CDX2-) and A2 (15%, ARX+/ISL1+/PDX1+/CDX2-) showed trabecular histology and glucagon/PP expression, with A2 also showing gastrin expression. B (18%, PDX1+/ISL1+/ARX-/CDX2-) showed solid histology, insulin, and somatostatin expression (P < .001). It included all insulinomas and had the best outcome (P < .01). C (15%, ARX-/PDX1-/ISL1-/CDX2-) showed solid histology and frequent expression of serotonin, calcitonin, and ACTH. D (5%, PDX1+/CDX2+/ISL1-/ARX-) showed solid histology, expressed ACTH/serotonin, and was an independent poor prognosticator (P < .01). Differential expressions of ARX, PDX1, ISL1, and CDX2 stratified PanNETs into 5 subgroups with different histologies, hormone expressions, and outcomes. Subgroups A1 and A2 resembled the alpha-cell-like type, and subgroup B, the beta-cell-like type. Subgroup C with almost no transcription factor signature was unclear in cell lineage, whereas the PDX+/CDX2+ signature of subgroup D suggested a pancreatic/intestinal cell lineage. Assigning PanNETs to the subgroups may help establish the diagnosis, predict the outcome, and guide the treatment.

[Histo- and molecular pathology in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified according to the WHO classification based on morphological criteria into neuroendocrine tumors, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumors are well differentiated neoplasms and show characteristic site-specific histological and molecular features, which is important for their clinical management. In cases dealing with metastasis, pathology often can help to identify the primary tumors using a small immunohistochemical marker panel. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are poorly differentiated neoplasms. They are subdivided into neuroendocrine carcinomas of small cell and large cell type. The molecular profile of neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms shows a close relationship to conventional adenocarcinomas with site-specific features. Molecular analysis of neuroendocrine carcinomas and neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are not yet fully integrated in daily diagnostics and are mainly performed in the context of precision oncology.

The role of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a highly accurate method for diagnosing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs); however, some PNETs are difficult to diagnose. Recently, the efficacy of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) in diagnosing solid pancreatic masses has been reported. However, the efficacy of nCLE in the diagnosis of PNETs remains unknown and only a small number of cases have been reported. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nCLE in the diagnosis of PNETs.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated 30 consecutive patients with suspected PNETs on contrast-enhanced computed tomography, who consented to nCLE combined with EUS-FNA and were diagnosed using EUS-FNA or surgical resection. The diagnostic criteria for PNETs using nCLE were based on the nesting and trabecular and glandular arrangement of tumor cell clusters surrounded by capillary vessels and fibrosis, as reported in previous studies.

RESULTS

The diagnosis using nCLE was classified into three categories: misdiagnosis in three cases (10%), non-diagnostic in six cases (20%), and diagnostic in 21 cases (70%). nCLE was able to diagnose PNET in one of the two cases with inconclusive EUS-FNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further development of the resolution and optimization of the diagnostic criteria are required, nCLE may constitute a useful diagnostic option in cases of inconclusive EUS-FNA for PNETs.

Tumor vascularity on contrast-enhanced computed tomography as a predictive marker of metastatic potential for small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Although surgical resection is generally suggested for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, observation can be proposed for carefully selected patients with small tumors. However, the indications for observation remain unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 77 patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, including small tumors (≤2.0 cm, n = 41), who received pancreatectomy. The ratio of the mean computed tomography value of a tumor in the late arterial/equilibrium phase (computed tomography a/e ratio) was used to evaluate tumor vascularity. Pathologic examinations of small tumors were conducted. The associations among the computed tomography a/e ratio, pathologic findings, and survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Small tumors were pathologically categorized by the degree of fibrosis as follows: medullary (n = 20), intermediate (n = 11), and fibrotic (n = 10). The fibrotic type had significantly lower computed tomography a/e ratios than the medullary type (median, 1.42 vs 2.03, P < .001). The median number of vessels with microscopic venous invasion was significantly higher in the fibrotic type than in the medullary type (4.5 vs 0.0, P < .001). The cutoff value of the computed tomography a/e ratio for predicting microscopic venous invasion was determined to be 1.54 by the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve, 0.832; sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 83.9%; accuracy, 82.9%). Microscopic venous invasion was an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival in overall patients (hazard ratio 5.18, P = .017).

CONCLUSION

The computed tomography a/e ratio may be a useful predictor of the metastatic potential of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and may help decide the indications of observation for small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

An Overview of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and an Update on Endoscopic Techniques for Their Management

The growing importance of advanced endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNETs) necessitates a comprehensive understanding of various biochemical markers, genetic testing methods, radiological techniques, and treatment approaches that encompass multiple disciplines within and beyond gastrointestinal oncology. This review aims to highlight key aspects of these topics, with a specific focus on emerging EUS-guided procedures for the management of PanNETs.

An Insight on Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are rare neoplasms arising from islets of the Langerhans in the pancreas. They can be divided into two groups, based on peptide hormone secretion, functioning and nonfunctioning PanNENs. The first group is characterized by different secreted peptides causing specific syndromes and is further classified into subgroups: insulinoma, gastrinoma, glucagonoma, somatostatinoma, VIPoma and tumors producing serotonin and adrenocorticotrophic hormone. Conversely, the second group does not release peptides and is usually associated with a worse prognosis. Today, although the efforts to improve the therapeutic approaches, surgery remains the only curative treatment for patients with PanNENs. The development of high-throughput techniques has increased the molecular knowledge of PanNENs, thereby allowing us to understand better the molecular biology and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of PanNENs. Although enormous advancements in therapeutic and molecular aspects of PanNENs have been achieved, there is poor knowledge about each subgroup of functioning PanNENs.Therefore, we believe that combining high-throughput platforms with new diagnostic tools will allow for the efficient characterization of the main differences among the subgroups of functioning PanNENs. In this narrative review, we summarize the current landscape regarding diagnosis, molecular profiling and treatment, and we discuss the future perspectives of functioning PanNENs.

Qualitative imaging features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms predict histopathologic characteristics including tumor grade and patient outcome

OBJECTIVES

To identify PanNEN imaging features associated with tumor grade and aggressive histopathological features.

METHODS

Associations between histopathological and imaging features of resected PanNEN were retrospectively tested. Histopathologic features included WHO grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), growth pattern (infiltrative, circumscribed), and intratumoral fibrosis (mature, immature). Imaging features included size, degree/uniformity of enhancement, progressive enhancement, contour, infiltrative appearance (infiltrative_im), calcifications, cystic components, tumor thrombus, vascular occlusion (VO), duct dilatation, and atrophy. Multinomial logistic regression analyses evaluated the magnitude of associations. Association of variables with outcome was assessed using Cox-proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

133 patients were included. 3 imaging features (infiltrative_im, ill-defined contour [contour_ill], and VO) were associated with all histopathologic parameters and poor outcome. Increase in grade increased odds of contour_ill by 15.6 times (p = 0.0001, 95% CI 3.8-64.4). PanNEN with VO were 51.1 times (p = 0.0002, 6.5-398.6) more likely to demonstrate LVI. For PanNEN with contour_ill, infiltrative growth pattern was 51.3 times (p < 0.0001, 9.1-288.4), and fibrosis was 14 times (p = 0.0065, 2.1-93.7) more likely. Contour_ill was associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (p = 0.0003, HR 18.29, 3.83-87.3) and VO (p = 0.0004, HR6.08, 2.22-16.68) with decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Infiltrative_im, contour_ill, and VO on imaging are associated with higher grade/histopathological parameters linked to tumor aggression, and poor outcome.

Immunophenotypic and molecular characterization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors producing serotonin

Serotonin producing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (SP-PanNET) account for 0.58-1.4% of all pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET). They may present with atypical symptoms, such as acute pancreatitis and are often radiologically characterized by main pancreatic duct dilatation. SP-PanNET are well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) distinct from classical PanNET by atypical serotonin secretion and abundant dense stroma deposition, like serotonin producing ileal NET leading in some cases to difficulties to reliably distinguish SP-PanNET from ileal NET metastases. The biology and molecular profile of SP-PanNET remain poorly characterized and the cell of origin within the pancreas is unclear. To address these questions, we analyzed a large cohort of SP-PanNET by immunohistochemistry (n = 29; ATRX, DAXX, MENIN, Islet1, PAX6, PDX1, ARX, CDX2), whole genome copy number array (Oncoscan™) and a large NGS panel (NovoPM™) (n = 10), FISH (n = 13) and RNA sequencing (n = 24) together with 21 ileal NET and 29 nonfunctioning PanNET (NF-PanNET). These analyses revealed a unique genomic profile with frequent isolated loss of chromosome 1 (14 cases-61%) and few pathogenic mutations (KMT2C in 2 cases, ARID1A in 1 case). Unsupervised RNAseq-based clustering showed that SP-PanNET were closer to NF-PanNET than ileal NET with an exclusive beta cell-like signature. SP-PanNET showed TGF-β pathway activation signatures associated with extracellular matrix remodeling and similar signature were reproduced in vitro when pancreatic stellate cells were exposed to serotonin. SP-PanNET immunohistochemical profile resemble that of ileal NET except for PDX1 and PAX6 expression to a lesser extend suggesting that these two markers may be useful to diagnose SP-PanNET. Taken together, this suggests that SP-PanNET are a very specific PanNET entity with a peculiar biology leading to the characteristic fibrotic aspect.

Infiltration pattern predicts metastasis and progression better than the T-stage and grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a proposal for a novel infiltration-based morphologic grading

The advancing edge profile is a powerful determinant of tumor behavior in many organs. In this study, a grading system assessing the tumor-host interface was developed and tested in 181 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), 63 of which were <=2 cm. Three tumor slides representative of the spectrum (least, medium, and most) of invasiveness at the advancing edge of the tumor were selected, and then each slide was scored as follows. Well-demarcated/encapsulated, 1 point; Mildly irregular borders and/or minimal infiltration into adjacent tissue, 2 points; Infiltrative edges with several clusters beyond the main tumor but still relatively close, and/or satellite demarcated nodules, 3 points; No demarcation, several cellular clusters away from the tumor, 4 points; Exuberantly infiltrative pattern, scirrhous growth, dissecting the normal parenchymal elements, 5 points. The sum of the rankings on the three slides was obtained. Cases with scores of 3-6 were defined as "non/minimally infiltrative" (NI; n = 77), 7-9 as "moderately infiltrative" (MI; n = 68), and 10-15 as "highly infiltrative" (HI; n = 36). In addition to showing a statistically significant correlation with all the established signs of aggressiveness (grade, size, T-stage), this grading system was found to be the most significant predictor of adverse outcomes (metastasis, progression, and death) on multivariate analysis, more strongly than T-stage, while Ki-67 index did not stand the multivariate test. As importantly, cases <=2 cm were also stratified by this grading system rendering it applicable also to this group that is currently placed in "watchful waiting" protocols. In conclusion, the proposed grading system has a strong, independent prognostic value and therefore should be considered for integration into routine pathology practice after being evaluated in validation studies with larger series.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: diagnosis and pitfalls

Common to neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas is their expression of synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and/or INSM1. They differ, however, in their histological differentiation and molecular profile. Three groups can be distinguished: well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine carcinomas), and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the expression of synaptophysin and, to a lesser extent, also chromogranin A is not restricted to the neuroendocrine neoplasms, but may also be in a subset of non-neuroendocrine epithelial and non-epithelial neoplasms. This review provides the essential criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms including diagnostic clues for the distinction of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors from neuroendocrine carcinomas and an algorithm avoiding diagnostic pitfalls in the delineation of non-neuroendocrine neoplasms with neuroendocrine features from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

An analysis of 130 neuroendocrine tumors G3 regarding prevalence, origin, metastasis, and diagnostic features

Limited data exist on high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs G3) which represent a new category among neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). We analyzed NETs G3 in a consultation series regarding prevalence, origin, metastasis, and diagnostic problems. Based on the WHO classification of digestive system tumors, 130 NETs G3 (9%) were identified in 1513 NENs. NET G3 samples were more often obtained from metastatic sites (69%) than NET G1/G2 samples (24%). NET G3 metastases presented most frequently in the liver (74%) and originated from the pancreas (38/90, 42%), followed by the lung (9%), ileum (7%), stomach (3%), rectum (1%), and rare sites (2%) such as the prostate and breast. The primaries remained unknown in 15%. NETs G3 had a median Ki67 of 30% that distinguished them from NECs (60%), though with great overlap. The expression of site-specific markers, p53, Rb1, and SST2 was similar in NETs G3 and NETs G1/G2, except for p53 and Rb1 which were abnormally expressed in 8% and 7% of liver metastases from NET G3 but not from NET G1/G2. NETs G3 were frequently referred as NECs (39%) but could be well distinguished from NECs by normal p53 (92% versus 21%) and Rb1 expression (93% versus 41%) expression. In conclusion, NETs G3 are frequently discovered as liver metastases from pancreatic or pulmonary primaries and are often misinterpreted as NEC. p53 and Rb1 are powerful markers in the distinction of NET G3 from NEC. Rarely, carcinomas from non-digestive, non-pulmonary organs with neuroendocrine features may present as NET G3.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Landscape and Horizon

CONTEXT.—

Since the initial description of pancreatic endocrine physiology and the recognition of islet cell tumors in the 1800s, there have been noteworthy advances in the pathobiology of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs), and definition of the important distinction between well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PanNEC). The evolving knowledge has resulted in a continuous update in terminology, classification, and grading system for this group of neoplasms. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors associated with hereditary conditions have been linked to unique molecular and genetic events, and sporadic PanNETs have specific gene signatures. Based on accumulative experience and knowledge, therapeutic strategies have been defined for this group of neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the evolution and description of the pathologic-genomic evolution of PanNENs, and to facilitate accurate pathologic interpretation for the corresponding clinical management.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review of published studies and author's own work.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Evolving experience and knowledge have established subtypes of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, based on their genotype and phenotype. Accurate pathologic interpretation of the specific neoplasm has significant implications for therapy and prognosis.

Serotonin immunoreactive pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm associated with main pancreatic duct dilation: a recognizable entity with excellent long-term outcome

OBJECTIVES

Dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is rare in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (panNEN) and may be due to different mechanisms. We compared the imaging and pathological characteristics as well as the outcome after resection of positive (S+) and negative (S-) serotonin immunoreactive panNENs causing MPD dilatation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with panNEN, with MPD dilatation (≥ 4 mm) on preoperative CT/MRI and resected between 2005 and 2019. Clinical, radiological, and pathological features were compared between S+ and S- panNENs. Imaging features associated with S+ panNEN were identified using logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of imaging for the differentiation of S+ and S- panNENs was assessed by ROC curve analysis. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The final population of 60 panNENs included 20/60 (33%) S+ panNENs. S+ panNENs were smaller (median 12.5 mm vs. 33 mm; p < 0.01), more frequently hyperattenuating/intense on portal venous phase at CT/MRI (95% vs. 25%, p < 0.01), and presented with more fibrotic stroma on pathology (60.7 ± 16% vs. 40.7 ± 12.8%; p < 0.01) than S- panNENs. Tumor size was the only imaging factor associated with S+ panNEN on multivariate analysis. A tumor size ≤ 20 mm had 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity for the diagnosis of S+ panNEN. Among 52 patients without synchronous liver metastases, recurrence occurred in 1/20 (5%) with S+ panNEN and 18/32 (56%) with S- panNEN (p < 0.01). Median RFS was not reached in S+ panNENs and was 31.3 months in S- panNENs (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In panNENs with MPD dilatation, serotonin positivity is associated with smaller size, extensive fibrotic stroma, and better long-term outcomes.

KEY POINTS

• S+ panNENs showed a higher percentage of fibrotic stroma, higher microvessel density, and lower proliferation index (Ki-67) compared to S- panNENs. • Radiologically, S+ panNENs causing dilatation of the MPD were characterized by a small size (< = 20 mm) and a persistent enhancement on portal phase on both CT and MRI. • Patients with S+ panNENs presented with longer RFS when compared to those with S- panNENs.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Clinicopathological features and pathological staging

The nomenclature and classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms has evolved in the last 15 years based on the advances in knowledge of the genomics, clinical behaviour and response to therapies. The current 2019 World Health Organization classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms categorises them into three groups; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs)(grade 1 grade 2, grade 3), pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) based on the mitotic rate, Ki-67 index, morphological differentiation and/or co-existing tissue subtype. PanNETs are also classified into non-functional NET, insulinoma, gastrinoma, VIPoma, glucagonoma, somatostatinoma, ACTH-producing NET and serotonin producing NET based on hormone production and clinical manifestations. A portion of the cases were associated with genetic syndromes such as multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN 1), neurofibromatosis and Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. In view of the distinctive pathology and clinical behaviour of PanNENs, the current 8th AJCC/UICC staging system has separated prognostic staging grouping for PanNETs from the pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas or MiNENs. Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas and MiNENs are staged according to the prognostic stage grouping for exocrine pancreatic carcinoma. The new stage grouping of PanNETs was validated to have survival curves separated between different prognostic groups. This refined histological and staging would lead to appropriate selections of treatment strategies for the patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Although pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors, their number is increasing with advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Even small lesions that are difficult to detect using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can now be detected with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Contrast-enhanced EUS is useful, and not only diagnosis but also malignancy detection has become possible by evaluating the vascularity of tumors. Pathological diagnosis using EUS with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful when diagnostic imaging is difficult. EUS-FNA can also be used to evaluate the grade of malignancy. Pooling the data of the studies that compared the PNENs grading between EUS-FNA samples and surgical specimens showed a concordance rate of 77.5% (κ-statistic = 0.65, 95% confidence interval = 0.59–0.71, p < 0.01). Stratified analysis for small tumor size (2 cm) showed that the concordance rate was 84.5% and the kappa correlation index was 0.59 (95% confidence interval = 0.43–0.74, p < 0.01). The evolution of ultrasound imaging technologies such as contrast-enhanced and elastography and the artificial intelligence that analyzes them, the evolution of needles, and genetic analysis, will further develop the diagnosis and treatment of PNENs in the future.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the biliary tree, liver and pancreas: a pathological approach

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreatobiliary tract and liver are a heterogeneous group that encompass a spectrum of entities with distinct morphological, biological and clinical features. Although in the various anatomical sub-sites of this region they show specific characteristics, these tumors, as a whole, share several etiological and clinical aspects. This review systematically addresses NENs arising in the extrahepatic bile ducts, gallbladder, liver and pancreas, with the principal aim of pinpointing essential diagnostic and classification issues. In addition, the section on hepatic NENs has been expanded to include metastatic disease of unknown primary site.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with somatostatin expression and paraganglioma-like features

A small fraction of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) shows a solid, paraganglioma-like (PG-like) histology. We wanted to know whether these PanNETs have a special hormone expression and are related to paragangliomas (PGs)/pheochromocytomas (PCs). We screened a series of 48 surgically resected PanNETs for their histological growth patterns and their association with expression of islet hormones. The PanNETs were divided into PG-like and non-PG-like tumors and immunohistochemically monitored for the expression of islet hormones, cytokeratins, and S100. The results were correlated to histological pattern, lymph node status, and data in 28 PGs/PCs, including 2 PGs attached to the pancreas. All PanNETs, in contrast to PGs/PCs, were cytokeratin positive. A PG-like growth pattern was identified in 9 of 48 PanNETs and correlated with somatostatin expression. Only half of the non-PG-like PanNETs also contained somatostatin-positive cells. Eight of 28 PGs/PCs expressed somatostatin, mostly in individual cells. PG-like PanNETs and non-PG-like PanNETs infiltrated the adjacent pancreatic tissue, whereas 2 to the pancreas-associated PGs were well demarcated. Lymph node metastases were detected in 58%, 39%, 57%, and 53% of the somatostatin-producing, somatostatin-negative, PG-like, and non-PG-like PanNETs, respectively. PG-like PanNETs, in contrast to PG/PCs, are characterized by the expression of cytokeratin and somatostatin, the development of lymph node metastasis, and the infiltration into pancreatic parenchyma. Non-PG-like PanNETs may also express somatostatin and show lymph node metastases to the same extent. A literature review of cases reported as PG of the pancreas reveals that only a small fraction of these tumors probably represents true pancreatic PGs.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Pancreas

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and pancreas are a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms characterized by common cellular features as well as unique site-specific traits. GI and pancreatic NENs are much rarer than the more common adenocarcinomas arising at these sites. However, the incidences of GI and pancreatic NENs have increased significantly, particularly in the stomach and common site, followed by rectum, appendix, colon, and stomach. Pancreatic NENs are also uncommon, with fewer than 1 per 100,000, accounting for 1% to 2% of all pancreatic neoplasms.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current state and ongoing controversies on terminology, classification and prognostication

Significant improvements have taken place in our understanding of classification neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas in the past decade. These are now regarded in three entirely separate categories: (I) neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are by definition well differentiated, the pancreatic counterpart of carcinoids; (II) neuroendocrine carcinomas, which are poorly differentiated (PDNEC), the pancreatic examples of small cell carcinomas or large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas; (III) other neoplasms that have neuroendocrine differentiation or a distinct neuroendocrine component. PanNETs are by far the most common. They are now regarded as malignancies (albeit often curable when low grade and low stage) with the exception of minute incidental proliferations (tumorlets, or dysplastic-like changes) seen in the setting of some syndromes like MEN. PanNETs are staged based on their size, and for small T1 tumors, watchful waiting is now being considered, although these tumors are also known to show about 10% metastatic rate and/or progression, creating concerns about this approach. PanNETs are graded into 3, based on the proliferative activity, mostly based on the Ki-67 index, and also partly mitotic activity, although the latter seldom if ever is the determinant of the final grade. Neuroendocrine neoplasms with well differentiated morphology but Ki-67 >20% are now regarded as PanNET Grade 3 (G3); they have been shown to have a prognosis significantly worse than lesser grade PanNETs but still incomparably better than frank PDNECs, the latter typically has Ki-67 >50% (often much higher) and require platinum-based chemotherapy. There are also cases that are ambiguous between PanNET-G3 and PDNEC, and very rarely transformation of the former to the latter appears to occur. For low grade (G1/G2) PanNETs, more refined criteria to further prognosticate this group are needed. Morphologic variants being recognized may bring new perspectives to this group.

A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Update of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms With a Focus on the New World Health Organization Classification

CONTEXT.—

According to the 2017 World Health Organization classification, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) include a new category of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, grade 3, which is often difficult to differentiate from pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grade 3 and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma are distinct entities with very different clinical presentation, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies. Recent discoveries on the molecular characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors also play an essential role in the pathologic differential diagnosis of PanNENs. In addition, the histopathologic varieties of PanNENs bring in many differential diagnoses with other pancreatic neoplasms, especially acinar cell carcinoma, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, and ductal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a brief update of the World Health Organization classification; the clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics; and the differential diagnoses and biological behavior of PanNENs.

DATA SOURCES.—

Analysis of the pertinent literature (PubMed) and authors' clinical practice experience based on institutional and consultation materials.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The evolving clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of PanNENs are reviewed. Important differential diagnoses with other neoplasms of the pancreas are discussed.

Neoplasms of the Neuroendocrine Pancreas: An Update in the Classification, Definition, and Molecular Genetic Advances

This review focuses on discussing the main modifications of the recently published 2017 WHO Classification of Neoplasms of the Neuroendocrine Pancreas (panNEN). Recent updates separate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors into 2 broad categories: well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (panNEC), and incorporates a new subcategory of "well-differentiated high-grade NET (G3)" to the well-differentiated NET category. This new classification algorithm aims to improve the prediction of clinical outcomes and survival and help clinicians select better therapeutic strategies for patient care and management. In addition, these neuroendocrine neoplasms are capable of producing large quantity of hormones leading to clinical hormone hypersecretion syndromes. These functioning tumors include, insulinomas, glucagonomas, somatostatinomas, gastrinomas, VIPomas, serotonin-producing tumors, and ACTH-producing tumors. Although most panNENs arise as sporadic diseases, a subset of these heterogeneous tumors present as parts on inherited genetic syndromes, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, von Hippel-Lindau, neurofibromatosis type 1, tuberous sclerosis, and glucagon cell hyperplasia and neoplasia syndromes. Characteristic clinical and morphologic findings for certain functioning and syndromic panNENs should alert both pathologists and clinicians as appropriate patient management and possible genetic counseling may be necessary.

Endoscopic ultrasound appearance of pancreatic serotonin-staining neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The pancreatic localization of serotonin-staining neuroendocrine neoplasms is extremely rare. This is a retrospective study aimed at analyzing the endoscopic ultrasound appearance of pancreatic serotoninoma.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2016, all consecutive patients with histologically proven pancreatic serotoninoma who had undergone endoscopic ultrasound were enrolled.

RESULTS

Eight patients (six F, median age 68.5 years) had a diagnosis of pancreatic serotoninoma and underwent endoscopic ultrasound examinations. Median diameter of the lesion was ten mm. The nodule echotexture was hypoechoic in seven out of eight cases. The most frequent localization was the pancreatic neck (four); in three cases, the tumor was located in the pancreatic head and in one in the body. In seven cases the tumor caused a main pancreatic duct dilation; in three cases also the secondary ducts were dilated. In one case a dilation of the common bile duct was observed. At contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound no one showed the typical contrast-enhancement. Elastography (available in two patients) showed a rigid pattern of the lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

From this case series a specific endoscopic ultrasound appearance resulted for pancreatic serotoninoma, different from other types of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm, but it is difficult to differentiate it from a pancreatic adenocarcinoma or an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

Pretreatment hematologic markers as prognostic predictors of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Systemic inflammation can be reflected by peripheral hematologic parameters and combined index like the lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the association between the hematologic markers and prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP–NETs).

Methods

A computerized systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to August 2016. Studies evaluating prognosis value of hematologic parameters in patients with GEP–NETs were retrieved. For meta-analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were extracted and synthesized using Review Manager software.

Results

We identified eight retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 724 cases. The majority of included studies focused on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). The prognostic values of NLR, PLR, and platelet count were reported in six studies, two studies, and one study, respectively. All the parameters were associated with prognostic outcomes in patients with GEP–NETs. A high NLR was significantly associated with poor prognosis in GEP–NETs (pooled HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.96–4.76, I² = 0%, P < 0.00001 for overall survival (OS); pooled HR 3.30, 95% CI 2.04–5.32, I² = 0%, P < 0.00001 for recurrence-free survival [RFS]). In PNETs, pooled-analyses also showed significant superiority of a low NLR on OS (pooled HR 4.21, 95% CI 1.95–9.13, I² = 0%, P = 0.0003) and RFS (pooled HR 5.37, 95% CI 2.14–13.47, I² = 0%, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the elevated NLR could be an adverse prognosis factor for GEP–NETs. The conclusion should be mainly limited to PNETs as the majority of included cases were PNET patients. The prognostic value of other hematologic parameters deserves further investigation. We recommend that further studies should use a continuous NLR variable and adopt a prospective and matched study design.

A comparison of enhancement patterns on dynamic enhanced CT and survival between patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with and without intratumoral fibrosis

PURPOSE

To compare CT findings and survival between patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) with and without fibrosis.

METHODS

Forty-five pNET patients with intratumoral fibrosis (group A) were matched for age, gender, and tumor size and grade with 45 pNET patients without (group B), and CT images were retrospectively reviewed. Hounsfield units (HUs) of tumors in unenhanced, arterial and portal phases, HU ratio (tumor to normal parenchyma) in each phase, enhancement patterns, visible enhancement pattern changes, and survival were compared.

RESULTS

Group A showed progressive enhancement patterns, while group B showed early enhancement and wash-out patterns (p < 0.05). HUs of tumors and HU ratio in the unenhanced phase were significantly higher in group A than group B (p ≤ 0.024), whereas those in the arterial phase were significantly lower in group A than group B (p ≤ 0.003). Peripheral to full or peripheral to peripheral enhancement change was more frequent in group A, while full to full enhancement change was more frequent in group B (p < 0.05). Group A showed significantly lower overall survival than group B (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

pNETs with fibrosis showed a progressive enhancement pattern and worse overall survival than pNETs without, which showed an early enhancement and wash-out pattern.

Pancreatic carcinoids (serotonin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms): Report of 5 cases and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are relatively rare tumors representing 1% to 2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. These tumors can secrete a variety of biologically active substances giving rise to distinct clinical symptoms or can be clinically nonfunctioning. Apart from insulinomas and gastrinomas, which constitute the majority of functioning pNENs, some tumors may secrete serotonin presenting with the features of the carcinoid syndrome. These so-called pancreatic carcinoids are considered relatively rare tumors and are associated with increased urinary levels of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). It has recently been suggested that the prevalence of such tumors might be underestimated.

CASES

We present a series of 5 patients from our database of 138 pNENs (5/138, 3.62%), harboring serotonin-producing pNENs and describe their distinctive clinical, biochemical, histopathological features, and response to treatment along with a review of the relevant available literature.

CONCLUSION

Such tumors are considered rare, although this may be an underestimate as systematic screening for the presence of serotonin in tissue or elevated urinary 5-HIAA levels in patients with apparently nonfunctioning pNENs is not currently recommended. In order to reach such a consensus, data from large prospective studies are needed in order to evaluate the impact of this type of tumors in survival and clinical outcome, since some studies have suggested a worse prognosis.

Recent Updates on Neuroendocrine Tumors From the Gastrointestinal and Pancreatobiliary Tracts

CONTEXT

-Gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatobiliary tracts contain a variety of neuroendocrine cells that constitute a diffuse endocrine system. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from these organs are heterogeneous tumors with diverse clinical behaviors. Recent improvements in the understanding of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts have led to more-refined definitions of the clinicopathologic characteristics of these tumors. Under the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, NETs are classified as grade (G) 1 NETs, G2 NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas. Histologic grades are dependent on mitotic counts and the Ki-67 labeling index. Several new issues arose after implementation of the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, such as issues with well-differentiated NETs with G3 Ki-67 labeling index and the evaluation of mitotic counts and Ki-67 labeling. Hereditary syndromes, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, neurofibromatosis 1, and tuberous sclerosis, are related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts. Several prognostic markers of GI and pancreatobiliary tract NETs have been introduced, but many of them require further validation.

OBJECTIVE

-To understand clinicopathologic characteristics of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts.

DATA SOURCES

-PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) reports were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

-In this review, we briefly summarize recent developments and issues related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: reporting clinically relevant features

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas can exhibit a wide spectrum of macroscopic and microscopic appearances. This not only causes occasional difficulties for the reporting pathologist in distinguishing these tumours from other lesions, but is also relevant clinically. As evidence accumulates, it becomes clear that multiple macroscopic and histological features of these neoplasms are relevant to the risk for malignant transformation and, consequently, of prime importance for clinical patient management. The need for detailed reporting is therefore increasing. This review discusses the panoply of gross and microscopic features of IPMN as well as the recommendations from recent consensus meetings regarding the pathology reporting on this tumour entity.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Magnetic resonance imaging features according to grade and stage

AIM

To describe magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) according to their grade and tumor-nodes-metastases stage by comparing them to histopathology and to determine the accuracy of MR imaging features in predicting their biological behavior.

METHODS

This study was approved by our institutional review board; requirement for informed patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. Preoperative MR examinations of 55 PanNEN patients (29 men, 26 women; mean age of 57.6 years, range 21-83 years) performed between June 2013 and December 2015 were reviewed. Qualitative and quantitative features were compared between tumor grades and stages determined by histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

Ill defined margins were more common in G2-3 and stage III-IV PanNENs than in G1 and low-stage tumors (P < 0.001); this feature had high specificity in the identification of G2-3 and stage III-IV tumors (90.3% and 96%, 95%CI: 73.1-97.5 and 77.7-99.8). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value was significantly lower in G2-3 and stage III-IV lesions compared to well differentiated and low-stage tumors (1.09 × 10^-3 mm²/s vs 1.45 × 10^-3 mm²/s and 1.10 × 10^-3 mm²/s vs 1.53 × 10^-3 mm²/s, P = 0.003 and 0.001). Receiving operator characteristic analysis determined optimal cut-offs of 1.21 and 1.28 × 10^-3 mm²/s for the identification of G2-3 and stage III-IV tumors, with sensitivity and specificity values of 70.8/80.7% and 64.5/64% (95%CI: 48.7-86.6/60-92.7 and 45.4-80.2/42.6-81.3).

CONCLUSION

MR features of PanNENs vary according to their grade of differentiation and their stage at diagnosis and could predict the biological behavior of these tumors.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms include well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) with well-differentiated PanNETs accounting for most cases. Other pancreatic primaries and metastatic carcinomas from other sites can mimic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Immunohistochemical studies can be used to aid in the differential diagnosis. However, no specific markers are available to differentiate PanNETs from NETs of other sites. Although NECs are uniformly deadly, PanNETs have variable prognosis. Morphology alone cannot predict the tumor behavior. Although some pathologic features are associated with an aggressive course, Ki67 is the only prognostic molecular marker routinely used in clinical practice.

Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have investigated sampling adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, none have described the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for pNENs, or the influencing factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, with post-operative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, and factors predictive of inadequate EUS sampling.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2014, a total of 698 patients underwent pancreatic resection and 1455 patients underwent EUS-FNA sampling for pancreatic lesions. A total of 410 cases underwent both surgical resection and preceding EUS-FNA. Of these, 60 cases (49 true pNEN, nine non-diagnostic, two misdiagnoses) were included. We studied diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA and factors that were associated with failed diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 60 cases, EUS-FNA yield was 49 true-positive cases, two misdiagnoses, and nine non-diagnostic cases (including six suggestive cases). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.5, 99.4, and 97.3 %, respectively; including the six suggestive cases, diagnostic values were 94.8 % sensitivity (55/58), 99.4 % specificity (350/352), and 98.7 % accuracy (405/410). In multivariate analysis, sampling adequacy rates were significantly lower when lesions were located in the pancreatic head [odds ratio (OR) = 10.0] and in tumor-rich stromal fibrosis (OR = 10.45). Tumor size, needle type, tumor grading, presence of cystic component, and time period were not significant factors.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA offers high accuracy for pNEN. However, location of the tumor in the pancreatic head and presence of rich stromal fibrosis negatively impacts sampling adequacy.

Expression of CD24, a Stem Cell Marker, in Pancreatic and Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVES

CD24 has been considered a normal and cancer stem cell marker. Potential intestinal stem cells weakly express CD24. In the pancreas, CD24 is a possible cancer stem cell marker for ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Expression of CD24 in intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) was examined. Immunohistochemistry was performed on benign duodenum, ileum mucosa, and pancreas, as well as primary duodenal, primary and metastatic ileal, and pancreatic NETs.

RESULTS

Scattered CD24-positive cells were noted in the duodenal and ileal crypts, most of which showed a strong subnuclear labeling pattern. Similar expression was observed in 41 (95%) of 43 primary ileal NETs but in only four (15%) of 26 duodenal NETs (P < .01). In addition, metastatic ileal NETs retained CD24 expression. Pancreatic islets did not express CD24, and only rare cells had subnuclear labeling of CD24 in the pancreatic ducts. Unlike ileal NETs, only five (5%) of 92 pancreatic NETs expressed CD24 in the subnuclear compartment (P < .01). All five NETs showed a unique morphology with prominent stromal fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CD24 expression was frequent in primary and metastatic midgut NETs but rare in pancreatic and duodenal NETs. Expression of CD24 in ileal NETs may have future diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Cadherin 17 is frequently expressed by 'sclerosing variant' pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour

AIMS

Recently, we described a series of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) featuring prominent stromal fibrosis, which we called sclerosing PanNETs. The aim of this study was to examine the pathological, immunophenotypic and clinical differences between sclerosing and non-sclerosing PanNETs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and six PanNETs were identified, of which 15 (14%) were sclerosing NETs. Tissue microarrays containing 44 non-sclerosing and five sclerosing PanNETs, as well as sections from 10 additional sclerosing tumours, were immunohistochemically labelled for serotonin, CDX2, CDH17, and islet 1. Sclerosing PanNETs were smaller (P = 0.045) and more likely to show an infiltrative growth pattern (P < 0.001) than non-sclerosing PanNETs. They were frequently associated with a large pancreatic duct, causing duct stenosis. Additionally, we found significantly increased expression of the small intestinal NET markers serotonin, CDX2 and CDH17 in sclerosing PanNETs (P < 0.001) as compared with non-sclerosing PanNETs. No difference in clinical outcome was found; however, more sclerosing PanNETs were stage IIB or above (P = 0.035), with lymph node metastasis being seen in three of nine sclerosing PanNETs with a tumour size of <20 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Sclerosing PanNETs have distinct pathological features and biomarker expression profiles. In addition, lymph node metastasis can be present even with small sclerosing PanNETs.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: pathologic and molecular characteristics

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms include mainly well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors but also rare poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Molecular mechanisms underlying pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorigenesis have recently been elucidated. While alterations in the chromatin remodeling and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways are present in most well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, mutations in TP53 and RB may contribute to the development of pancreatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. With these discoveries, new molecular targeted therapies have become available and show promise in some patients with pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor.

Primary solid pancreatic tumors: recent imaging findings updates with pathology correlation

The imaging findings of primary solid pancreatic tumors have long been studied and are generally well-established. However, interestingly enough, a wealth of new information has recently appeared in the literature, including the imaging findings of novel or previously seldom-addressed pathological entities as well as atypical imaging findings of common tumors, both of which are well-correlated with the pathology findings. 5 %-14 % of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas have been reported on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography to be isoattenuating, and thus making the imaging diagnosis challenging. The imaging-pathology correlation in such isoattenuating tumors is presented along with a discussion regarding the early imaging detection of pancreatic cancers. Colloid (or mucinous non-cystic) pancreatic cancer may resemble a less harmful cystic lesion due to its abundant extracellular mucin, and thus requiring caution in the image interpretation. Serotonin-producing neuroendocrine tumors have recently been recognized as a separate entity from usual neuroendocrine tumors. Exuberant fibrosis caused by serotonin metabolites and scarce tumor cells creates a unique pattern of pancreatic ductal obstruction seen on imaging. Small solid pseudopapillary tumors appear as unencapsulated, completely solid lesions with gradually increasing enhancement after contrast administration, unlike typical solid pseudopapillary neoplasms that present as a large mixed solid and degenerated cystic or hemorrhagic mass encapsulated by a thick capsule and which, therefore, tend to be misdiagnosed on imaging. Solid serous adenoma is a rare, solid variant of serous cystadenoma and appears on imaging as a hypervascular, solid nodule due to its genuinely microscopic cystic, alveolar, and ectatic tubular tumor architecture.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: current concepts and controversies

In the past decade, the clinico-pathologic characteristics of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in the pancreas have been further elucidated. Previously termed "islet cell tumors/carcinomas" or "endocrine neoplasms", they are now called pancreatic NETs (PanNETs). They occur in relatively younger patients and may arise anywhere in the pancreas. Some are associated with von Hippel-Lindau, MEN1, and other syndromes. It is now widely recognized that, with the exception of tumorlets (minute incipient neoplasms) that occur in some syndromes like MEN1, all PanNETs are malignant, albeit low-grade, and although they have a protracted clinical course and overall 10-year survival of 60-70 %, even low-stage and low-grade examples may recur and/or metastasize on long-term follow-up. Per recent consensus guidelines adopted by both European and North American NET Societies (ENETS and NANETs) and WHO-2010, PanNETs are now graded and staged separately, unlike previous classification schemes that used a combination of grade, stage, and adjunct prognosticators in an attempt to define "benign behavior" or "malignant" categories. For staging, the ENETs proposal may be more applicable than CAP/AJCC, which is based on the staging of exocrine tumors. Current grading of PanNETs is based on mitotic activity and ki-67 index. Other promising prognosticators such as necrosis, CK19, c-kit, and others are still under investigation. It has also been recognized that PanNETs have a rather wide morphologic repertoire including oncocytic, pleomorphic, ductulo-insular, sclerosing, and lipid-rich variants. Most PanNETs are diagnosed by fine needle aspiration biopsy, in which single, monotonous plasmacytoid cells with fair amounts of cytoplasm and distinctive neuroendocrine chromatin are diagnostic. Molecular alterations of PanNETs are also very different than that of ductal or acinar tumors. Loss of expression of DAXX and ATRX proteins has been recently identified in 45 %. Along with these improvements, several controversies remain, including grading, value of current cutoff ranges, and the best methods for counting ki-67 index (manual count by computer-captured image may be the most practical for the time being). More important is the controversial use of the term "carcinoma", which was previously employed in WHO-2004 only for invasive and metastatic cases but has now been made synonymous with grade 3 group of tumors. It is becoming clear that grade 3 group comprises two distinct categories: (1) differentiated but proliferatively more active tumors which typically have ki-67 indices in the 20-50 % range and (2) true poorly differentiated NE carcinomas as defined in the lung, with ki-67 typically >50 %. Further studies are needed to address these controversial aspects of PanNETs.

The immunohistochemical expression of islet 1 and PAX8 by rectal neuroendocrine tumors should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary origin

Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be classified by histologic pattern and secretory products. Recently, rectal NETs have been noted to exhibit immunohistochemical (IHC) positivity for Islet 1 and PAX8, which are generally considered markers for NETs of pancreatic origin. In this study, we sought to characterize the IHC staining profile of rectal NETs and determine whether there was any correlation between the histologic pattern of rectal NETs and their IHC profile. Fifty-six primary rectal NETs were histologically reviewed and stained with antibodies against Islet 1, PAX8, CDX2, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin. In a subset of 31 cases, immunoreactivity for serotonin, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) was also studied. By morphology, the tumors studied included 55 % trabecular, 27 % solid nested, 4 % acinar, and 14 % mixed patterns. Islet 1 was positive in 89 % and PAX8 in 79 % of cases. CDX2 was negative in all 56 cases. Cytoplasmic staining was observed for chromogranin A in 30 % of cases and for synaptophysin in all 56 cases. Cytoplasmic staining for serotonin, PP, and PAP was present in 16, 61, and 97 % of cases, respectively. There was no correlation between histologic pattern and IHC staining pattern with any of the antibodies studied. We have demonstrated that Islet 1 and PAX8 are not entirely specific for NETs of pancreatic origin, as they are expressed in a majority of rectal NETs. Since rectal NETs may show an IHC staining profile which mirrors that of pancreatic NETs (Islet 1 and PAX8-positive, CDX2-negative), a metastatic rectal NET should be considered in the differential diagnosis and ruled out clinically in the work-up of a metastatic NET of unknown primary origin which exhibits this staining profile.

Giant insulinoma: a report of 3 cases and review of the literature

Insulinoma is a rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor that is usually described as benign, sporadic, and very small (<2 cm). However, there have been rare case reports of insulinoma presenting as a giant tumor. We describe 3 cases of giant insulinomas, all of which developed liver metastases. The patients were aged 38, 63, and 67 years. Clinically, all patients presented with Whipple's triad associated with a large mass located in the pancreatic tail. The tumors ranged in size from 10 to 15 cm. On microscopic examination, the tumors were well differentiated with amyloid deposition ranging between 20% and 30%. Immunohistochemically, all 3 tumors showed strong diffuse expression of chromogranin and synaptophysin, whereas they were only focally positive for insulin. One patient developed liver recurrence 3 years after resection of the primary tumor yet remained asymptomatic without treatment. Another patient with liver recurrence underwent right hepatectomy and has been free of disease for 2 years. The third patient died of metastatic disease 13 years after initial surgery. Giant insulinomas are characterized by focal expression of insulin and high rates of liver metastases. Long-term follow-up is mandatory in these patients, as recurrence is expected after primary surgery.

Intraductal polypoid lipid-rich neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas with entrapped ductules: case report and review of the literature

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors of the main pancreatic duct are rare and usually small due to symptoms of pancreatic duct obstruction. We present a case of a large (3 cm), well-differentiated (G1) lipid-rich polypoid neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas completely occluding the main pancreatic duct with non-neoplastic-entrapped ductules and CK19 positivity. Clinical, radiological, gross, microscopic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural findings are discussed. The literature pertaining to the unique features of this case is reviewed including clinical and pathologic pitfalls and the possible etiologic and prognostic significance of these findings.