1
|
Shi M, Morice WG. How I diagnose large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Clin Pathol 2024; 162:433-449. [PMID: 38823032 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL) represents a rare neoplasm of mature T cells or natural killer (NK) cells, with an indolent clinical course. Diagnosing LGLL can be challenging because of overlapping features with reactive processes and other mimickers. METHODS By presenting 2 challenging cases, we elucidate the differentiation of LGLL from its mimics and highlight potential diagnostic pitfalls. A comprehensive review of the clinicopathologic features of LGLL was conducted. RESULTS Large granular lymphocytic leukemia displays a diverse spectrum of clinical presentations, morphologies, flow cytometric immunophenotypes, and molecular profiles. These features are also encountered in reactive conditions, T-cell clones of uncertain significance, and NK cell clones of uncertain significance. CONCLUSIONS In light of the intricate diagnostic landscape, LGLL workup must encompass clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, clonal, and molecular findings. Meeting major and minor diagnostic criteria is imperative for the accurate diagnosis of LGLL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Shi
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Libonati R, Soda M, Statuto T, Valvano L, D’Auria F, D’Arena G, Pietrantuono G, Villani O, Mansueto GR, D’Agostino S, Di Somma MD, Telesca A, Vilella R. T-Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia with Hepatosplenic T-Cell Lymphoma? A Rare Case of Simultaneous Neoplastic T-Cell Clones Highlighted by Flow Cytometry and Review of Literature. Biomedicines 2024; 12:993. [PMID: 38790955 PMCID: PMC11117647 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12050993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Lymphoproliferative diseases are a heterogeneous set of malignant clonal proliferations of lymphocytes. Despite well-established diagnostic criteria, the diagnosis remains difficult due to their variety in clinical presentation and immunophenotypic profile. Lymphoid T-cell disorders are less common than B-cell entities, and the lack of a clear immunophenotypic characteristic makes their identification hard. Flow cytometry turned out to be a useful tool in diagnosing T-cell disorders and to resolve complicated cases, especially if the number of analyzable neoplastic cells is small. We present a case of a 55-year-old man with simultaneous lymphoproliferative neoplastic T-cell clones, one αβ and the other γδ, identified and characterized by flow cytometry (FC), exploiting the variable expression intensity of specific markers. However, the patient's rapid decline made it impossible to define a differential diagnosis in order to confirm the identity of the γδ clone, which remains uncertain. This case is added to the few other cases already documented in the literature, characterized by the co-existence of T-large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL)-αβ and T-LGLL-γδ/Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL). Our case underlines the key role of sensitive diagnostic tools in the assessment of potential relationship between the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment in the two pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossana Libonati
- Laboratory of Clinical Research and Advanced Diagnostics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero In Vulture, Italy; (R.L.); (M.S.); (A.T.); (R.V.)
| | - Michela Soda
- Laboratory of Clinical Research and Advanced Diagnostics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero In Vulture, Italy; (R.L.); (M.S.); (A.T.); (R.V.)
| | - Teodora Statuto
- Laboratory of Clinical Research and Advanced Diagnostics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero In Vulture, Italy; (R.L.); (M.S.); (A.T.); (R.V.)
| | - Luciana Valvano
- Laboratory of Clinical Research and Advanced Diagnostics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero In Vulture, Italy; (R.L.); (M.S.); (A.T.); (R.V.)
| | - Fiorella D’Auria
- Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero In Vulture, Italy;
| | - Giovanni D’Arena
- Immunohematology and Transfusional Medicine, “S. Luca” Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84078 Vallo della Lucania, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Pietrantuono
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture, Italy; (G.P.); (O.V.); (G.R.M.); (S.D.)
| | - Oreste Villani
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture, Italy; (G.P.); (O.V.); (G.R.M.); (S.D.)
| | - Giovanna Rosaria Mansueto
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture, Italy; (G.P.); (O.V.); (G.R.M.); (S.D.)
| | - Simona D’Agostino
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture, Italy; (G.P.); (O.V.); (G.R.M.); (S.D.)
| | - Massimo Dante Di Somma
- Anatomical Pathology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture, Italy;
| | - Alessia Telesca
- Laboratory of Clinical Research and Advanced Diagnostics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero In Vulture, Italy; (R.L.); (M.S.); (A.T.); (R.V.)
| | - Rocchina Vilella
- Laboratory of Clinical Research and Advanced Diagnostics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), 85028 Rionero In Vulture, Italy; (R.L.); (M.S.); (A.T.); (R.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seheult JN, Otteson GE, Jevremovic D, Horna P, Timm MM, Yuan J, Morice WG, Olteanu H, Shi M. Establishing NK-Cell Receptor Restriction by Flow Cytometry and Detecting Potential NK-Cell Clones of Uncertain Significance. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100255. [PMID: 37385341 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cells develop a complex inhibitory and/or activating NK-cell receptor system, including killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs or CD158) and CD94/NKG2 dimers, which are variably combined to generate the individual's NK-cell receptor repertoire. Establishing NK-cell receptor restriction by flow cytometric immunophenotyping is an important step in diagnosing NK-cell neoplasms, but reference interval (RI) data for interpreting these studies are lacking. Specimens from 145 donors and 63 patients with NK-cell neoplasms were used to identify discriminatory rules based on 95% and 99% nonparametric RIs for CD158a+, CD158b+, CD158e+, KIR-negative, and NKG2A+ NK-cell populations to establish NK-cell receptor restriction. These 99% upper RI limits (NKG2a >88% or CD158a >53% or CD158b >72% or CD158e >54% or KIR-negative >72%) provided optimal discrimination between NK-cell neoplasm cases and healthy donor controls with an accuracy of 100% compared with the clinicopathologic diagnosis. The selected rules were applied to 62 consecutive samples received in our flow cytometry laboratory that were reflexed to an NK-cell panel due to an expanded NK-cell percentage (exceeding 40% of total lymphocytes). Twenty-two (35%) of 62 samples were found to harbor a very small NK-cell population with restricted NK-cell receptor expression based on the rule combination, suggestive of NK-cell clonality. A thorough clinicopathologic evaluation for the 62 patients did not reveal diagnostic features of NK-cell neoplasms; therefore, these potential clonal populations of NK cells were designated as NK-cell clones of uncertain significance (NK-CUS). In this study, we established decision rules for NK-cell receptor restriction from the largest published cohorts of healthy donors and NK-cell neoplasms. The presence of small NK-cell populations with restricted NK-cell receptors does not appear to be an uncommon finding, and its significance requires further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jansen N Seheult
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Gregory E Otteson
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Dragan Jevremovic
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Pedro Horna
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael M Timm
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ji Yuan
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - William G Morice
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Horatiu Olteanu
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Min Shi
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Isolated anemia in patients with large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL). Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:30. [PMID: 35194022 PMCID: PMC8863822 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00632-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL) frequently present with neutropenia. When present, anemia is usually accompanied by neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia and isolated anemia is uncommon. We evaluated a cohort of 244 LGLL patients spanning 15 years and herein report the clinicopathologic features of 34 (14%) with isolated anemia. The patients with isolated anemia showed a significantly male predominance (p = 0.001), a lower level of hemoglobulin (p < 0.0001) and higher MCV (p = 0.017) and were less likely to have rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.023) compared to the remaining 210 patients. Of the 34 LGLL patients with isolated anemia, 13 (38%) presented with pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), markedly decreased reticulocyte count and erythroid precursors, and more transfusion-dependence when compared to non-PRCA patients. There was no other significant clinicopathologic difference between PRCA and non-PRCA patients. 32 patients were followed for a median duration of 51 months (6-199). 24 patients were treated (11/11 PRCA and 13/21 non-PRCA patients, p < 0.02). The overall response rate to first-line therapy was 83% [8/11 (72.7%) for PRCA, 12/13 (92.3%) for non-PRCA], including 14 showing complete response and 6 showing partial response with a median response duration of 48 months (12-129). Half of non-PRCA patients who were observed experienced progressive anemia. During follow-up, no patients developed neutropenia; however, 5/27 (18.5%) patients developed thrombocytopenia. No significant difference in overall survival was noted between PRCA and non-PRCA patients. In summary, this study demonstrates the unique features of LGLL with isolated anemia and underscores the importance of recognizing LGLL as a potential cause of isolated anemia, which may benefit from disease-specific treatment. LGLL patients with PRCA were more likely to require treatment but demonstrated similar clinicopathologic features, therapeutic responses, and overall survival compared to isolated anemia without PRCA, suggesting PRCA and non-PRCA of T-LGLL belong to a common disease spectrum.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pflug N, Littauer A, Beverungen D, Sretenovic A, Wahnschaffe L, Braun T, Dechow A, Jungherz D, Otte M, Monecke A, Bach E, Franke GN, Schwind S, Jentzsch M, Platzbecker U, Herling M, Vucinic V. Case Report: Large Granular Lymphocyte Leukemia (LGLL)-A Case Series of Challenging Presentations. Front Oncol 2022; 11:775313. [PMID: 35070980 PMCID: PMC8767099 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.775313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Large granular lymphocyte leukemia (LGLL) represents a rare group of diseases with considerable difficulties in their correct diagnostic workup and therapy. The major challenges lie in their distinction from reactive (including autoimmune) lymphoproliferations. Moreover, monoclonal LGL proliferative diseases are in fact a heterogeneous group of disorders, as recognized by the three subtypes in the current WHO classification. It distinguishes two chronic forms (the focus of this case series), namely T-LGLL and chronic lymphoproliferative disorders of Natural Killer cells (CLPD-NK) as well as aggressive NK-cell leukemia. In the clinical routine, the variable presentations and phenotypes of T-LGLL and CLPD-NK are underappreciated. The relevant differential diagnoses range from benign reactive T-cell expansions to other mature T-cell leukemias to highly aggressive γδ-lymphomas. T-LGLL or CLPD-NK patients suffer from a wide variety of symptoms often including, but not limited to, cytopenias or classical autoimmune phenomena. They receive treatments ranging from mere supportive measures (e.g. antibiotics, growth factors, transfusions) over strategies of immunosuppression up to anti-leukemic therapies. The diagnostic pitfalls range from recognition of the subtle T-cell proliferation, repeated establishment of monoclonality, assignment to a descript immunophenotypic pattern, and interpretations of molecular aberrancies. Here, we report a series of selected cases to represent the spectrum of LGLL. The purpose is to raise awareness among the scientifically or practically interested readers of the wide variety of clinical, immunological, and phenotypic features of the various forms of LGLL, e.g. of T-cell type, including its γδ forms or those of NK-lineage. We highlight the characteristics and courses of four unique cases from two academic centers, including those from a prospective nationwide LGLL registry. Each case of this instructive catalogue serves to transport a key message from the areas of (chronic inflammatory) contexts in which LGLL can arise as well as from the fields of differential diagnostics and of various treatment options. Implications for optimization in these areas are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natali Pflug
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Littauer
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine, GK Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Germany
| | - David Beverungen
- Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Linus Wahnschaffe
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Till Braun
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Dechow
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis Jungherz
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Moritz Otte
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Astrid Monecke
- Institute of Pathology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Enrica Bach
- Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Georg-Nikolaus Franke
- Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schwind
- Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Madlen Jentzsch
- Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Uwe Platzbecker
- Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marco Herling
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Vladan Vucinic
- Clinic of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, and Hemostaseology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Horna P, Olteanu H, Jevremovic D, Otteson GE, Corley H, Ding W, Parikh SA, Shah MV, Morice WG, Shi M. Single-Antibody Evaluation of T-Cell Receptor β Constant Chain Monotypia by Flow Cytometry Facilitates the Diagnosis of T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia. Am J Clin Pathol 2021; 156:139-148. [PMID: 33438036 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The diagnosis of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) is challenging because of overlapping immunophenotypic features with reactive T cells and limitations of T-cell clonality assays. We studied whether adding an antibody against T-cell receptor β constant region 1 (TRBC1) to a comprehensive flow cytometry panel could facilitate the diagnosis of T-LGLL. METHODS We added TRBC1 antibody to the standard T-cell and natural killer (NK) cell panel to assess T-cell clonality in 56 T-LGLLs and 34 reactive lymphocytoses. In addition, 20 chronic lymphoproliferative disorder of NK cells (CLPD-NKs) and 10 reactive NK-cell lymphocytoses were analyzed. RESULTS Clonal T cells were detected in all available T-LGLLs by monotypic TRBC1 expression and clonal/equivocal T-cell receptor gene rearrangement (TCGR) studies, compared with only 27% of T-LGLLs by killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) restriction. Overall, 85% of T-LGLLs had a blood tumor burden greater than 500 cells/µL. Thirty-four reactive cases showed polytypic TRBC1 expression, except for 5 that revealed small T-cell clones of uncertain significance. All CLPD-NKs showed expected clonal KIR expression and negative TRBC1 expression. CONCLUSIONS Addition of TRBC1 antibody to the routine flow cytometry assay could replace the TCGR molecular study and KIR flow cytometric analysis to assess clonality, simplifying the diagnosis of T-LGLL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Horna
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN
| | - Horatiu Olteanu
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Heidi Corley
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN
| | - Wei Ding
- Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Min Shi
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Horna P, Shi M, Olteanu H, Johansson U. Emerging Role of T-cell Receptor Constant β Chain-1 (TRBC1) Expression in the Flow Cytometric Diagnosis of T-cell Malignancies. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22041817. [PMID: 33673033 PMCID: PMC7918842 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
T-cell clonality testing is integral to the diagnostic work-up of T-cell malignancies; however, current methods lack specificity and sensitivity, which can make the diagnostic process difficult. The recent discovery of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific for human TRBC1 will greatly improve the outlook for T-cell malignancy diagnostics. The anti-TRBC1 mAb can be used in flow cytometry immunophenotyping assays to provide a low-cost, robust, and highly specific test that detects clonality of immunophenotypically distinct T-cell populations. Recent studies demonstrate the clinical utility of this approach in several contexts; use of this antibody in appropriately designed flow cytometry panels improves detection of circulating disease in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, eliminates the need for molecular clonality testing in the context of large granular lymphocyte leukemia, and provides more conclusive results in the context of many other T-cell disorders. It is worth noting that the increased ability to detect discrete clonal T-cell populations means that identification of T-cell clones of uncertain clinical significance (T-CUS) will become more common. This review discusses this new antibody and describes how it defines clonal T-cells. We present and discuss assay design and summarize findings to date about the use of flow cytometry TRBC1 analysis in the field of diagnostics, including lymph node and fluid sample investigations. We also make suggestions about how to apply the assay results in clinical work-ups, including how to interpret and report findings of T-CUS. Finally, we highlight areas that we think will benefit from further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Horna
- Division of Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (P.H.); (M.S.); (H.O.)
| | - Min Shi
- Division of Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (P.H.); (M.S.); (H.O.)
| | - Horatiu Olteanu
- Division of Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (P.H.); (M.S.); (H.O.)
| | - Ulrika Johansson
- SI-HMDS, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jevremovic D, Olteanu H. Flow Cytometry Applications in the Diagnosis of T/NK-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2019; 96:99-115. [PMID: 30729667 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the role of flow cytometry in the diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of T and NK-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. For each category, we will briefly discuss the immunophenotypic features of normal T and NK cells, and address technical issues in flow cytometry, the approach to diagnosis in various contexts, pitfalls in interpretation, and its use in follow-up and post-therapy management. In addition to reviewing the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in several of specific T and NK cell entities, we will also cover some of the new immunophenotypic markers. Furthermore, we will touch upon incorporation of flow cytometry in the final diagnosis, including correlation with other ancillary tests. © 2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dragan Jevremovic
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Horatiu Olteanu
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|