Microglandular adenosis of the breast: a deceptive and still mysterious benign lesion

Carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis of the breast: clinicopathological and genetic analysis

AIMS

To study the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis (MGACA) of the breast.

METHODS

Clinicopathological features of 13 cases of MGACA were analysed. All tumours were molecular subtype by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of AR, CD8, FOXC1 and DCLK1 expression. Next-generation sequencing including 511 genes was analysed.

RESULTS

All tumours showed a histological spectrum ranging from microglandular adenosis (MGA) to atypical MGA (AMGA), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and MGACA. Invasive components in 10 of 13 tumours were invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST), 3 were metaplastic carcinoma with mesenchymal differentiation (including two cases of matrix-producing carcinoma) mixed with NST. All lesion-associated epithelial cells were triple negative (TNBC) and positive for S-100. Reticulin staining showed the presence of basement membrane in MGA, AMGA and DCIS, and its absence in invasive carcinoma. According to IHC-based TNBC molecular subtyping, 10 tumours were basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS), 2 were luminal androgen receptor and 1 was immunomodulatory. 10 patients had gene mutations. Pathogenic germline mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were detected in four tumours (30.7%) and one tumour (7.7%). Somatic mutation rate of the TP53 gene was 69.2%. Amplification rates of MYC, FGFR2, JAK2 and MCL1 genes in our cohort were 46.2%, 15.4%, 15.4% and 7.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MGACA is a rare breast carcinoma, with distinct morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features. Most MGACA were BLIS molecular subtype of TNBC. TP53 and BRCA1 gene mutation and MYC gene amplification were the most common genetic changes in MGACA.

New insights into acinic cell carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathology, origin of histology, molecular features, prognosis, and treatment

Acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) of the breast is a rare malignant epithelial neoplasm, with approximately 60 cases reported in the literature. It predominantly affects women and exhibits significant histological heterogeneity. The diagnosis of breast AciCC is primarily based on the presence of eosinophilic and/or basophilic granular cytoplasm and markers of serous acinar differentiation. Despite being considered a low-grade variant of conventional triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), over 25% of patients with breast AciCC have adverse clinical outcomes. Additionally, in early research, microglandular adenosis (MGA) and atypical MGA were considered potential precursors for various breast cancers, including intraductal carcinoma, invasive ductal carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, metaplastic carcinoma, and AciCC. Similarly, some studies have proposed that breast AciCC should be considered a type of carcinoma developing in MGA with acinic cell differentiation rather than a distinct entity. Therefore, the pathogenesis of breast AciCC has not yet been clarified. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, the literature has not summarized the latest prognosis and treatment of breast AciCC. In this review, we synthesized the current literature and the latest developments, aiming at exploring the clinicopathology, histological origin, molecular features, prognosis, and treatment of breast AciCC from a novel perspective.

Case report: Fibroadenomas associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia and infiltrating epitheliosis mimicking invasive carcinoma

Infiltrating epitheliosis (IE) is an uncommon type of complex sclerosing lesion in the breast. This condition is characterized by the infiltration of ducts into a scleroelastotic stroma, along with the presence of cells that display architectural and cytological patterns similar to those observed in usual ductal hyperplasia. We herein report a case of a 24-year-old woman who presented with bilateral breast nodules, which were initially identified as multiple fibroadenomas based on ultrasound findings. The patient underwent Mammotome system and regional mastectomy procedures, and subsequent pathological analysis confirmed the presence of multiple fibroadenomas with atypical ductal hyperplasia and infiltrating epitheliosis. This case discusses the challenges faced in diagnosing malignancy in a patient with multiple fibroadenomas accompanied by atypical ductal hyperplasia and infiltrating epitheliosis.

Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis and Classification of Breast Tumors

CONTEXT.—

In the clinical practice of breast pathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) of different markers is widely used for the diagnosis and classification of breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an overview of currently used and recently identified IHC stains that have been implemented in the field of diagnostic breast pathology.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from literature review and clinical experience of the authors as breast pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

In the current review, we summarize the common uses of IHC stains for diagnosing different types of breast lesions, especially invasive and noninvasive breast lesions, and benign and malignant spindle cell lesions. In addition, the cutting-edge knowledge of diagnostic carcinoma markers will lead us to further understand the different types of breast carcinoma and differentiate breast carcinomas from other carcinomas of similar morphology. Knowing the strengths and limitations of these markers is essential to the clinical practice of breast pathology.

Luminal-Type Invasive Carcinoma in Association With Microglandular Adenosis/Atypical Microglandular Adenosis: A Case Report and Molecular Comparison

Microglandular adenosis (MGA) is a proliferative breast lesion composed of small, uniform glands lacking a myoepithelial cell layer while still invested by the basement membrane. The glands percolate haphazardly through the breast parenchyma rather than maintaining a lobular architecture, typical of other forms of adenosis.MGA is a benign lesion though atypical forms have been well described, often in close association with carcinoma. MGA, atypical MGA (AMGA), and the vast majority of MGA-associated carcinomas (MGACA) are negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) by immunohistochemistry. In light of these findings and early molecular studies, MGA is hypothesized to represent a clonal process and nonobligate precursor of basal-type breast carcinomas. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman and the first published molecular comparison of a luminal-type invasive ductal carcinoma with its associated MGA/AMGA. Analysis of small nucleotide variants (SNVs) revealed that 63% of the SNVs identified in the MGA were present in the AMGA while only 10% of them were present in the MGACA, suggesting a direct relationship between MGA and AMGA but not MGA and MGACA.

A case of extensively spreading acinic cell carcinoma of the breast with microglandular features

Acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) is an exceptionally rare type of breast carcinoma with a low-grade morphology and a favorable prognosis. It is postulated to be a type of invasive carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis (MGA). We report a case of extensively spreading ACC of the breast with MGA-like features. Macroscopically, yellowish nodules were widely distributed throughout the right breast, up to the axilla, without mass formation. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of two distinct carcinoma components: one was multiple nodular lesions showing invasive carcinoma with fused solid nests, and the other was a widely spreading lesion exhibiting MGA-like features with uniform small single glands. Immunohistochemically, both components were negative for ER, PR, and HER2, and expressed EMA, S100 and lysozyme. The distinct morphology and molecular expression indicated ACC. The single glands in the MGA-like area lacked myoepithelial cells but were linearly surrounded by type IV collagen, a basement membrane component. This case supports the hypothesis that ACC and MGA have the same lineage and indicates that ACC is not necessarily a low-grade malignancy and can be aggressive.

Breast lesions with myoepithelial phenotype

Myoepithelial cells (MECs) constitute a continuous layer of cells surrounding the breast glands, localised between the epithelial cells (ECs) and the basal membrane. MECs play important roles in normal mammary gland as they produce basal membrane and stimulate secretion. During neoplastic transformation, MECs act as a barrier preventing stromal invasion. MECs themselves can undergo a great variety of changes, ranging from hyperplastic to metaplastic, to neoplastic, and giving rise to a wide spectrum of morphological pictures sometimes difficult to interpret on routine diagnoses. Several benign and malignant breast tumours can present features of MECs differentiation. As these latter tumours are quite infrequent, the purpose of the present study is to offer a review of the morphological spectrum of MECs lesions, with correlations to prognosis.

Pitfalls in breast pathology

Accurate pathological diagnosis is the cornerstone of optimal clinical management for patients with breast disease. As non-operative diagnosis has now become the standard of care, histopathologists encounter the daily challenge of making definitive diagnoses on limited breast core needle biopsy (CNB) material. CNB samples are carefully evaluated using microscopic examination of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and supportive immunohistochemistry (IHC), providing the necessary information to inform the next steps in the patient care pathway. Some entities may be difficult to distinguish on small tissue samples, and if there is uncertainty a diagnostic excision biopsy should be recommended. This review discusses (1) benign breast lesions that may mimic malignancy, (2) malignant conditions that may be misinterpreted as benign, (3) malignant conditions that may be incorrectly diagnosed as primary breast carcinoma, and (4) some IHC pitfalls. The aim of the review is to raise awareness of potential pitfalls in the interpretation of breast lesions that may lead to underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, or incorrect classification of malignancy with potential adverse outcomes for individual patients.

Metaplastic Matrix-Producing Carcinoma and Apocrine Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Microglandular Adenosis: A Unique Case Report

Microglandular adenosis is a non-lobulocentric haphazard proliferation of small round glands composed of a single layer of flat to cuboidal epithelial cells. The glandular structures lack a myoepithelial layer; however, they are surrounded by a basement membrane. Its clinical course is benign, when it is not associated with invasive carcinoma. In around 30% of cases, there is a gradual transition to atypical microglandular adenosis, carcinoma in situ, and invasive breast carcinoma of several different histologic subtypes, including an invasive carcinoma of no special type, metaplastic matrix-producing carcinoma, secretory carcinoma, metaplastic carcinoma with squamous differentiation, acinic cell carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Recent molecular studies suggest that microglandular adenosis is a non-obligate precursor of triple-negative breast carcinomas. In this manuscript, we present a unique case of microglandular adenosis associated with metaplastic matrix-producing carcinoma and HER-2 neu oncoprotein positive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ with apocrine differentiation in a 79-year-old patient.

Two cases of mammary acinic cell carcinomas with microglandular structures mimicking microglandular adenosis

Acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC) of breast is a rare subtype of triple-negative breast carcinoma demonstrating a wide morphologic spectrum. In this study, we perform a detailed morphologic and immunohistochemical description of two cases of the rare entity and review the published relative literature. Histologically, the two cases both showed predominantly microglandular and solid structures overlapping with the histological features of microglandular adenosis (MGA), and one case presented spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma with chondromyxoid matrix as a minor morphologic pattern. In two cases, most of the cancer cells were positive for lysozyme and antitrypsin strongly and extensively, but negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptors (AR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The true relationship between breast AcCC and MGA or carcinoma arising in MGA(CAMGA) may remain unclear; re-excision is advised when the MGA-like content extends to the surgical margins in the setting of breast AcCC. More cases and further molecular investigations are required to elucidate the true histogenesis and give the patients appropriate treatment.

Avoiding "False Positive" and "False Negative" Immunohistochemical Results in Breast Pathology

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays an important role in the evaluation of breast pathology specimens to provide both diagnostic and prognostic/therapeutic information. Although most IHCs used in breast pathology can be easily interpreted, pitfalls do exist, especially in some uncommon scenarios. This review intends to focus on the challenging areas such as the interpretation of myoepithelial cell markers in differentiating benign proliferation and in situ carcinoma from invasive carcinoma, lobular cell markers in differentiating lobular from ductal carcinoma, cytokeratin and other markers in diagnosing metaplastic carcinoma, and breast tissue origin markers in diagnosing breast primary carcinoma. The challenges in interpreting prognostic and predictive markers will be also discussed.

Triple-negative breast carcinomas of low malignant potential: review on diagnostic criteria and differential diagnoses

Triple-negative breast carcinomas constitute a wide spectrum of lesions, mostly being highly aggressive. Nevertheless, some special histologic subtypes can have low malignant potential. The purpose of the present paper is to review diagnostic criteria and prognostic parameters of breast neoplasms of special histotypes. Specifically, adenoid cystic carcinoma, adenomyoepithelioma, acinic cell carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, tall cell carcinoma with reverse polarity, and secretory carcinoma will be discussed. For each tumour, definition and morphological and molecular features, together with prognostic parameters, will be presented. Paradigmatic cases will be illustrated.

Morphologic and immunohistochemical features of carcinoma involving microglandular adenosis of the breast following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Microglandular adenosis (MGA)-related lesions, including atypical MGA (AMGA) and carcinoma involving MGA (C-MGA), are characterized by epithelial atypia, negative hormone receptors, and HER2 status, and can mimic invasive triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in core needle biopsies (CNB) resulting in selection for treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We identified 12 cases of AMGA and/or C-MGA in post-NAC excision specimens (EXC) and analyzed their morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features. All CNBs were initially diagnosed as containing TNBC. Upon re-review, TNBC was confirmed in nine cases. In three CNBs AMGA and/or C-MGA had been interpreted as TNBC. AMGA was initially recognized in only one case but AMGA and/or C-MGA were present in an additional nine CNBs. At EXC, no residual TNBC was present in 5 of 9 EXCs and all 12 cases showed residual AMGA and/or C-MGA. Similar to conventional MGA, AMGA, and C-MGA were positive for S-100, laminin and collagen IV and negative for calponin and p63. Following NAC, these lesions retained their typical staining pattern despite acquiring treatment-related morphologic alterations, most notably of which were areas of single cell growth pattern seen in eight EXCs. This study is the first to report the effects of NAC on AMGA and C-MGA. Our data showed no response of the AMGA and/or C-MGA following NAC in contrast to the high response rate of conventional TNBC. In particular, the infiltrative single cell pattern of post-NAC MGA-related lesions closely mimicked residual TNBC. The persistence of AMGA and C-MGA following NAC supports the notion that these lesions are distinct from conventional TNBC. Our findings also highlight the challenges in recognizing AMGA and C-MGA in CNBs which may lead to unwarranted treatment with NAC in the absence of conventional TNBC.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a proposal for classification

Breast lesions with a prominent myoepithelial cell component constitute a heterogeneous group of benign and malignant neoplastic proliferations. These lesions are often dual epithelial-myoepithelial, but may be purely myoepithelial cell in nature. Benign epithelial-myoepithelial lesions typically maintain the morphology and immunophenotype of the normal bilayer epithelial myoepithelial structures. However, the distinction between the two cell components is not always clear-cut in malignant lesions in which the histogenesis of myoepithelial cells remains uncertain. Neoplastic biphasic epithelial-myoepithelial lesions of the breast include adenomyoepithelioma (AME), pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Four histological patterns of classical AME have been described: tubular, lobulated, spindle-cell and adenosis variants. Overlapping patterns occur and some AMEs display an intraductal papillary pattern that may represent a fifth variant. AME can be benign or malignant. Classical AME may show atypical features, which are not sufficient for the diagnosis of malignancy (atypical AME). Atypical AME is recognised as a lesion of uncertain malignant potential with limited metastatic capability. Based on the histological features, we propose a classification of malignant AME (M-AME) into three variants: M-AME in situ, M-AME invasive and AME with invasive carcinoma. In this review, we provide an overview of myoepithelial lesions of the breast focusing on the classification of AME to improve not only the consistency of reporting but also help to guide further management decision-making.

[Microglandular adenosis of the breast in a patient with a history of mediastinal radiotherapy]

The risk of secondary tumors in patients who have received mediastinal radiation therapy is well-known. Microglandular adenosis of the breast is a rare lesion that is considered benign, although its possible role as a precursor of invasive breast carcinoma has been considered. We present a case of microglandular adenosis in a patient who received mediastinal radiation therapy in childhood for Hodgkin's lymphoma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of microglandular adenosis in a patient with mediastinal radiotherapy which may shed light on its pathogenesis.

Microglandular Adenosis and Associated Invasive Carcinoma

CONTEXT.—

Microglandular adenosis is a rare borderline neoplastic lesion of the breast composed of haphazardly located small, round tubules with a single cell layer interspersed within breast stroma and/or adipose tissue. Microglandular adenosis is devoid of a myoepithelial cell layer, and has a characteristic immunophenotype, being positive for S100 and negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2/neu. When associated with cancer, microglandular adenosis and associated invasive carcinoma share the same molecular alterations, including TP53 mutation; therefore, microglandular adenosis is considered a nonobligate precursor of triple (HER2/neu, estrogen and progesterone receptors)-negative breast carcinoma. Microglandular adenosis is an important diagnostic pitfall as it can be easily mistaken for a low-grade invasive carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a review of the clinicopathologic features of microglandular adenosis and associated invasive carcinoma, with emphasis on key features separating entities in the differential diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES.—

Review of current literature on microglandular adenosis and associated invasive carcinoma and personal experience of authors.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Microglandular adenosis can mimic breast carcinoma; attention to key features, including morphologic-immunophenotypic correlation, is essential in establishing the diagnosis.

Microglandular Adenosis: A Possible Non-Obligate Precursor to Breast Carcinoma With Potential to Either Luminal-Type or Basal-Type Differentiation

Microglandular adenosis (MGA) of the breast is exceedingly rare, with only a few case reports and series published to date. Previous studies have elegantly demonstrated the progression of benign MGA to atypical MGA to MGA-in situ carcinoma to invasive carcinoma and therefore suggest MGA as a possible non-obligate precursor lesion to a subset of breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemically, MGA is negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2-neu oncoprotein expression, and carcinomas arising in the setting of MGA are often reported to be triple negative. In this article, we present a unique case of an ER+/PR+/HER2- invasive carcinoma associated with MGA and atypical MGA. Our case highlights the diagnostic pitfall of MGA and suggests that MGA is a heterogeneous group of lesions with potential for either luminal-type or basal-type differentiation during progression to breast carcinoma.