1
|
Liu Z, Wei S, Tang J. Clinicopathologic Features of Noninvasive Inverted Urothelial Papillary Tumor. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:409-413. [PMID: 37370208 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinicopathologic features and recurrence rates of inverted noninvasive urothelial papillary tumors have been poorly characterized to date with few larger studies evaluating long-term outcomes. The spectrum of histomorphology, clinical features, and prognosis of inverted lesions of the urinary bladder are retrospectively reviewed. METHODS Archived paraffin-embedded urothelial tumor samples from patients diagnosed with inverted urothelial papillary lesions between January 2005 and June 2020 were collated. A matched control population of patients with exophytic papillary lesions of the urothelium diagnosed during the same time period was randomly selected. The conventional clinicopathologic features of inverted urothelial papillary tumor were evaluated retrospectively and patient demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrence, and survival information were recorded. RESULTS Lower recurrence rates were observed for inverted papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (IPUNLMP) relative to papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential and for low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern (LG-PUCI) relative to low-grade papillary urothelial carcinomas. No recurrence was found among the inverted urothelial papilloma cases. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 100.0% and 85.2% for IPUNLMP patients; 94.4% and 80.4% for papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential; 89.5% and 82.0% for LG-PUCI; 73.7% and 54.6% for low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma; 40.0% and 20.0% for high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern patients and 26.7% and 26.7% for high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of IPUNLMP and LG-PUCI/high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern indicated that tumor number (hazard ratio=4.356; 95% CI: 1.145-16.570; P =0.031) was a powerful prognostic factor for disease-free survival. CONCLUSION Noninvasive, papillary urothelial lesions of the bladder tend to have lower recurrence and a better outcome if an inverted growth pattern is shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyu Liu
- Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Primary urothelial carcinoma of the ureter without concurrent renal pelvic or bladder carcinoma: A contemporary clinicopathologic analysis. Pathol Res Pract 2021; 226:153584. [PMID: 34461429 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Primary urothelial carcinoma (UCa) of the ureter is relatively uncommon, comprising less than 10% of all urinary tract tumors. Typically, ureteral UCa is found in association with other urinary tract tumors, such as renal pelvic or bladder UCa, making it challenging to analyze the clinicopathologic features in isolation. With only a few small case series and case reports available, our understanding of primary ureteral UCa is limited. Herein, we conducted one of the largest studies to date of primary ureteral UCa without concurrent renal pelvic or bladder UCa. Clinicopathologic parameters including extent of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, variant histology, presence of UCa in situ, inverted growth pattern, and clinical follow-up information were obtained. Ninety-seven cases were included in the study. Thirty-nine cases (40%) showed invasion, the preponderance of which invaded lamina propria (15%; 15/97), followed by periureteral soft tissue/adipose (14%; 14/97), muscularis propria (9%; 9/39), and seminal vesicle invasion (1%; 1/97). Clinical follow-up data was available for 80/89 (89%) patients with a mean duration of 35 months (range: 1-206 months). Metastatic UCa developed in 28/89 (35%) patients, 20/28 (71%) of which had invasive disease at presentation. Of the 17 (21%) patients who died, 12 (71%) initially presented with invasive UCa. Although more patients had non-invasive UCa, the propensity for worse outcomes in patients with invasive disease is greater compared to other urinary tract sites. These findings further emphasize the importance of early recognition of these tumors, in view of the relatively high preponderance of advanced disease and mortality in a subset of these patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Amin MB, Comperat E, Epstein JI, True LD, Hansel D, Paner GP, Al-Ahmadie H, Baydar D, Bivalacqua T, Brimo F, Cheng L, Cheville J, Dalbagni G, Falzarano S, Gordetsky J, Guo CC, Gupta S, Hes O, Iyer G, Kaushal S, Kunju L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Matoso A, Netto G, Osunkoya AO, Pan CC, Pivovarcikova K, Raspollini MR, Reis H, Rosenberg J, Roupret M, Shah RB, Shariat S, Trpkov K, Weyerer V, Zhou M, McKenney J, Reuter VE. The Genitourinary Pathology Society Update on Classification and Grading of Flat and Papillary Urothelial Neoplasia With New Reporting Recommendations and Approach to Lesions With Mixed and Early Patterns of Neoplasia. Adv Anat Pathol 2021; 28:179-195. [PMID: 34128483 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) undertook a critical review of the recent advances in bladder neoplasia with a focus on issues relevant to the practicing surgical pathologist for the understanding and effective reporting of bladder cancer, emphasizing particularly on the newly accumulated evidence post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The work is presented in 2 manuscripts. Here, in the first, we revisit the nomenclature and classification system used for grading flat and papillary urothelial lesions centering on clinical relevance, and on dilemmas related to application in routine reporting. As patients of noninvasive bladder cancer frequently undergo cystoscopy and biopsy in their typically prolonged clinical course and for surveillance of disease, we discuss morphologies presented in these scenarios which may not have readily applicable diagnostic terms in the WHO classification. The topic of inverted patterns in urothelial neoplasia, particularly when prominent or exclusive, and beyond inverted papilloma has not been addressed formally in the WHO classification. Herein we provide a through review and suggest guidelines for when and how to report such lesions. In promulgating these GUPS recommendations, we aim to provide clarity on the clinical application of these not so uncommon diagnostically challenging situations encountered in routine practice, while also importantly advocating consistent terminology which would inform future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahul B Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science, Memphis
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Vienna General Hospital
- Medical University Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University
| | - Jonathan I Epstein
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology
- Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lawrence D True
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Donna Hansel
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health Science University, OR
| | | | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dilek Baydar
- Department of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Gordetsky
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Charles C Guo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Sounak Gupta
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ondra Hes
- Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | | | - Seema Kaushal
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Lakshmi Kunju
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Andres Matoso
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology
- Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - George Netto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
- Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Chin Chen Pan
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kristina Pivovarcikova
- Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Maria R Raspollini
- Department of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Henning Reis
- Institute of Pathology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen
| | | | - Morgan Roupret
- GRC 5 Predictive ONCO-URO, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Rajal B Shah
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kiril Trpkov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Veronika Weyerer
- Department of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ming Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jesse McKenney
- Robert J Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sanguedolce F, Calò B, Chirico M, Falagario U, Busetto GM, Zanelli M, Bisagni A, Zizzo M, Ascani S, Carrieri G, Cormio L. Distinctive morphological and molecular features of urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern. J Pathol Transl Med 2021; 55:239-246. [PMID: 34111910 PMCID: PMC8353137 DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2021.04.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern (UC-IGP) is a peculiar entity within the spectrum of urothelial lesions. While efforts have been made over the last few decades to unravel its carcinogenesis and relationship with conventional urothelial carcinoma, the exact classification of inverted urothelial lesions is a matter of debate. The morphological features of UC-IGP pose several issues in differential diagnosis with other mostly benign lesions. Various techniques, including immunohistochemistry, UroVysion, and many molecular methods, have been employed to study the exact nature of this lesion. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the morphological and immunophenotypical aspects of UC-IGP. Moreover, we present and discuss the immunohistochemical and molecular markers involved in diagnosis and prognosis of UC-IGP lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Beppe Calò
- Urology Unit, University of Foggia, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | - Marco Chirico
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bisagni
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Zizzo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Ascani
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Urology Unit, University of Foggia, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|