Global assessment of IRF8 as a novel cancer biomarker

Diagnostic approach to blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: historical perspectives and current understanding

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy composed of immature cells that exhibit plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) differentiation. The diagnosis of BPDCN is often challenging due to its rarity and morphologic and phenotypic overlap with other hematologic malignancies, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The emergence of tagraxofusp, a CD123-directed cytotoxin, and other novel therapies has underscored the importance of accurately diagnosing BPDCN. This review initially outlined the clinical and histopathological features of BPDCN, including patients with immunoblastoid morphology. Various proposed diagnostic criteria based on flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry findings were presented, highlighting critical points of caution in the diagnostic process. Strategies for detecting minimal residual disease or microinvasion in BPDCN, a significant clinical issue, were also discussed. Additionally, we reviewed the recurrent 8q24 (MYC) and MYB rearrangements observed in BPDCN, which can aid in diagnosis. Furthermore, we explored mature plasmacytoid dendritic cell proliferation (MPDCP) associated with myeloid neoplasm, which is characterized by a clonal proliferation of pDCs in cases with a defined myeloid neoplasm and may also serve as a potential differential diagnosis for BPDCN. Lastly, we discussed pDC-AML, characterized by pDC proliferation in AML cases, which can also be part of MPDCP and is often associated with frequent RUNX1 mutations. Overall, this review provides insights into BPDCN diagnosis and highlights the current challenges in its detection and differential diagnosis.

Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm Presenting as a Mammary Gland Tumor in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report

Emanating from a discrete category within the lympho-hematopoietic tumor system, as established by the World Health Organization in 2008, the blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm constitutes an uncommon malignant hematological disorder. It is routinely misidentified on account of its conspicuous dermatological manifestation, yet may insidiously permeate bone marrow and lymph nodes, involving peripheral blood and diverse extra-nodal tissues. Instances of mammary gland encroachment are extraordinarily infrequent. The current document delineates a case of a 14-year-old female patient contending with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm, whose primary symptom was a mammary nodule, and whose breast and bone marrow/blood involvement were synchronous, in attempt to increase clinical vigilance.

The roles of IRF8 in nonspecific orbital inflammation: an integrated analysis by bioinformatics and machine learning

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific Orbital Inflammation (NSOI) represents a persistent and idiopathic proliferative inflammatory disorder, characterized by polymorphous lymphoid infiltration within the orbit. The transcription factor Interferon Regulatory Factor 8 (IRF8), integral to the IRF protein family, was initially identified as a pivotal element for the commitment and differentiation of myeloid cell lineage. Serving as a central regulator of innate immune receptor signaling, IRF8 orchestrates a myriad of functions in hematopoietic cell development. However, the intricate mechanisms underlying IRF8 production remain to be elucidated, and its potential role as a biomarker for NSOI is yet to be resolved.

METHODS

IRF8 was extracted from the intersection analysis of common DEGs of GSE58331 and GSE105149 from the GEO and immune- related gene lists in the ImmPort database using The Lasso regression and SVM-RFE analysis. We performed GSEA and GSVA with gene sets coexpressed with IRF8, and observed that gene sets positively related to IRF8 were enriched in immune-related pathways. To further explore the correlation between IRF8 and immune-related biological process, the CIBERSORT algorithm and ESTIMATE method were employed to evaluate TME characteristics of each sample and confirmed that high IRF8 expression might give rise to high immune cell infiltration. Finally, the GSE58331 was utilized to confirm the levels of expression of IRF8.

RESULTS

Among the 314 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), some DEGs were found to be significantly different. With LASSO and SVM-RFE algorithms, we obtained 15 hub genes. For biological function analysis in IRF8, leukocyte mediated immunity, leukocyte cell-cell adhesion, negative regulation of immune system process were emphasized. B cells naive, Macrophages M0, Macrophages M1, T cells CD4 memory activated, T cells CD4 memory resting, T cells CD4 naive, and T cells gamma delta were shown to be positively associated with IRF8. While, Mast cells resting, Monocytes, NK cells activated, Plasma cells, T cells CD8, and T cells regulatory (Tregs) were shown to be negatively linked with IRF8. The diagnostic ability of the IRF8 in differentiating NSOI exhibited a good value.

CONCLUSIONS

This study discovered IRF8 that are linked to NSOI. IRF8 shed light on potential new biomarkers for NSOI and tracking its progression.

IRF8 in Conjunction With CD123 and CD20 to Distinguish Lupus Erythematosus Panniculitis From Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-Cell Lymphoma

Distinguishing lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP) from subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a diagnostic challenge with important clinical implications. Immunohistochemical expression of interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) has been shown to highlight cells with plasmacytoid dendritic cell differentiation. Considering that the presence of plasmacytoid dendritic cells highlighted by CD123 immunolabeling is a well-described feature that supports LEP over SPTCL, we hypothesized that IRF8 immunohistochemistry can be used as a diagnostic test to improve accuracy in differentiating LEP from SPTCL. In this study, we assessed the expression of IRF8, CD123, and CD20 in 35 cutaneous biopsies from 31 distinct patients, which included 22 cases of LEP and 13 cases of SPTCL. We found that clusters of IRF8-positive cells within the dermis, and away from subcutaneous fat, could discriminate LEP from SPTCL ( P =0.005). Similarly, CD123-positive clusters in any location were observed in LEP but absent in all cases of SPTCL. In addition, we found that dermal CD20-predominant lymphoid aggregates could help discriminate LEP from SPTCL ( P =0.022). As individual assays, IRF8, CD123, and CD20 were highly specific (100%, 100%, and 92%, respectively) though poorly sensitive (45%, 29%, and 50%, respectively). However, a panel combining IRF8, CD123, and CD20, with at least 1 positive marker was more accurate than any individual marker by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Our study provides a rationale for potentially including IRF8 as part of an immunohistochemical panel composed of other currently available markers used to differentiate LEP from SPTCL.

IRF8 may be a useful marker for blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm, especially with weak CD123 expression

We highlight the utility of interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8), a novel marker of monocytic and dendritic cell lineages, in the diagnosis of a case of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) presenting initially in the skin. A 60-year-old male with a previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome presented with cutaneous nodules on chest and scalp. A punch biopsy specimen of a skin nodule showed a diffuse dermal infiltrate of atypical mononuclear cells. The neoplastic cells expressed CD4, CD56, CD43, and TdT but showed minimal reaction for TCL-1 and CD123, and were negative for CD34, CD117, and MPO, confounding the diagnosis. IRF8 performed in retrospect was strongly positive. A new punch biopsy specimen of a chest nodule showed the blastoid tumor cells were positive for TCL-1, CD4, and CD56, but dim CD123. Subsequent bone marrow involvement showed blastoid tumor cells with intense positivity for CD123, CD4, and CD56, which was supportive of the BPDCN diagnosis. BPDCN cases with weak or variable CD123 and TCL-1 expression represent a potential diagnostic pitfall. In a recent study, 15 cases of BPDCN showed uniformly strong staining for IRF8, while CD123 was dim or negative in 4 of these 15 cases. We suggest IRF8 may be a useful marker for BPDCN, especially in cases with weak or variable expression of CD123 and TCL1.

Targeting cGAS/STING signaling-mediated myeloid immune cell dysfunction in TIME

Myeloid immune cells (MICs) are potent innate immune cells serving as first responders to invading pathogens and internal changes to cellular homeostasis. Cancer is a stage of altered cellular homeostasis that can originate in response to different pathogens, chemical carcinogens, and internal genetic/epigenetic changes. MICs express several pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on their membranes, cytosol, and organelles, recognizing systemic, tissue, and organ-specific altered homeostasis. cGAS/STING signaling is a cytosolic PRR system for identifying cytosolic double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in a sequence-independent but size-dependent manner. The longer the cytosolic dsDNA size, the stronger the cGAS/STING signaling activation with increased type 1 interferon (IFN) and NF-κB-dependent cytokines and chemokines' generation. The present article discusses tumor-supportive changes occurring in the tumor microenvironment (TME) or tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) MICs, specifically emphasizing cGAS/STING signaling-dependent alteration. The article further discusses utilizing MIC-specific cGAS/STING signaling modulation as critical tumor immunotherapy to alter TIME.

Expanding the Immunophenotypic Spectrum of Neoplastic and Reactive Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells

OBJECTIVES

Targeted therapies for blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) have presented a diagnostic dilemma for differentiating residual BPDCN from reactive plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) because these conditions have a similar immunoprofile, necessitating discovery of additional diagnostic markers.

METHODS

Fifty cases of BPDCN involving bone marrow (26/50) and skin (24/50) as well as other hematologic malignancies (67) and nonneoplastic samples (37) were included. Slides were stained using a double-staining protocol for the following immunohistochemical marker combinations: TCF4/CD123, TCF4/CD56, SOX4/CD123, and IRF8/CD123.

RESULTS

The nuclear marker SOX4 is expressed in neoplastic pDCs; in our cohort, SOX4/CD123 showed 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity in distinguishing BPDCN from reactive pDCs and other neoplasms. TCF4/CD56 had a 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for BPDCN. IRF8 is a nonspecific marker that is positive in BPDCN and pDCs as well as other myeloid malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel immunohistochemical combination SOX4/CD123 distinguishes BPDCN, including CD56-negative BPDCN, from both reactive pDCs and other neoplasms. Because of their high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, the double-staining marker combinations TCF4/CD123, TCF4/CD56, and SOX4/CD123 can be used to confirm lineage in BPDCN cases and detect minimal/measurable residual disease in tissue specimens.