Benefit versus risk for oral, inhaled, and nasal glucocorticosteroids

The Effects of Intranasal, Inhaled and Systemic Glucocorticoids on Intraocular Pressure: A Literature Review

Topical glucocorticoids are a well-known risk factor of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in one third of the general population and in up to 90% of glaucomatous patients. Whether this steroid response is caused by intranasal, inhaled or systemic glucocorticoids, is less known. This study presents an overview of the current literature on the topic, thereby providing guidance on when ophthalmological follow-up is indicated. A literature study was performed in Medline, and 31 studies were included for analysis. Twelve out of fourteen studies discussing intranasal glucocorticoids show no significant association with an elevated IOP. Regarding inhaled glucocorticoids, only three out of twelve studies show a significant association. The observed increase was either small or was only observed in patients treated with high inhaled doses or in patients with a family history of glaucoma. An elevated IOP caused by systemic glucocorticoids is reported by four out of the five included studies, with one study reporting a clear dose–response relationship. This review concludes that a steroid response can be triggered in patients treated with systemic glucocorticoids. Inhaled glucocorticoids may cause a significant IOP elevation when administered in high doses or in patients with a family history of glaucoma. At present, there is no evidence for a clinically significant steroid response caused by intranasally administered glucocorticoids.

Use of corticosteroids during pregnancy and risk of asthma in offspring: a nationwide Danish cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether in utero exposure to local and systemic corticosteroids is associated with asthma development in offspring.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

We included all singletons born alive in Denmark between 1996 and 2009. Data on maternal corticosteroid use, asthma in offspring and covariates were obtained from medical registries.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We compared asthma risks of children prenatally exposed to corticosteroids and of children of former corticosteroid users with that of unexposed children. We computed absolute risks and used proportional-hazards regression to compute adjusted HRs (aHRs). Using logistic regression we compared exposed children with unexposed siblings in a 'within-mother-between-pregnancy' analysis. Adjustment addressed varying length of follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 877 778 children, 3.6% of whom were prenatally exposed to systemic (n=5327) or local (n=24 436) corticosteroids. A total of 105 677 children developed asthma during follow-up with a 10-year risk of 18.4% among the exposed and 13.5% among the unexposed. The aHR was 1.54 (95% CI 1.45 to 1.65) for systemic use, 1.45 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.50) for local use and 1.32 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.34) for former use. The adjusted OR of the 'within-mother-between-pregnancy' analysis was 1.11 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.25).

CONCLUSIONS

These population-based data do not support a strong causal association between maternal corticosteroid use during pregnancy and increased asthma risk in offspring.

Budesonide/formoterol in the treatment of asthma

Budesonide and formoterol are available in a combined inhaler that offers therapeutic advantages in the treatment of asthma. The rapid onset of bronchodilation seen with formoterol means that budesonide/formoterol can be used as both maintenance and relief therapy. This approach has been shown to reduce exacerbations and overcome the problem of patients who overuse short-acting β-agonists at the expense of inhaled corticosteroids. Concerns regarding safety of long-acting β-agonists have not been confirmed in studies of the budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler, and we believe the benefits of this medication clearly outweigh any possible small increased risk.

Recommendation for optimal management of severe refractory asthma

Patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled despite treatment with a combination of high dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators pose a major clinical challenge and an important health care problem. Patients with severe refractory disease often require regular oral corticosteroid use with an increased risk of steroid-related adverse events. Alternatively, immunomodulatory and biologic therapies may be considered, but they show wide variation in efficacy across studies thus limiting their generalizability. Managing asthma that is refractory to standard treatment requires a systematic approach to evaluate adherence, ensure a correct diagnosis, and identify coexisting disorders and trigger factors. In future, phenotyping of patients with severe refractory asthma will also become an important element of this systematic approach, because it could be of help in guiding and tailoring treatments. Here, we propose a pragmatic management approach in diagnosing and treating this challenging subset of asthmatic patients.

Dissociation of local anti-inflammatory effect and systemic effects of mometasone furoate in mice

Mometasone furoate (MF) is a topical glucocorticoid used for atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and bronchial asthma. To elucidate the usefulness of MF, the dissociation between local anti-inflammatory effects and systemic effects of MF was compared with that of beclomethasone 17,21-dipropionate (BDP). MF was more potent than BDP in croton oil-induced ear edema tests in mice. Oral systemic effects of MF were inversely lower than that of BDP on thymolysis, plasma corticosterone lowering, and suppression of body weight gain in mice. These results indicate that MF has a higher therapeutic index and superior clinical usefulness as a topical glucocorticoid compared to BDP.

Managing patients with chronic severe asthma: rise to the challenge

Most asthmatic patients with moderate to severe disease can be satisfactorily managed with a combination of inhaled corticosteroids and beta(2)-agonists. However, there are perhaps 10% of the asthmatic population with persistent symptoms, impaired quality of life and excessive health-care utilization, despite this management regime. These patients often require frequent and even occasionally regular oral corticosteroid use. Chronic, severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease with distinct sub-phenotypes. A systematic diagnostic work-up may help to identify these distinct sub-phenotypes and this may help guide treatment and may even provide information about prognosis. Optimal treatment of chronic severe asthma should achieve the best possible asthma control and quality of life with the least dose of systemic corticosteroids. The choice and formulation of therapeutic agent is dictated by the severity of disease and includes conventional, immunosuppressive/immunomodulating and biologic therapies. Unfortunately, current asthma management guidelines offer little contribution to the care of the challenging patient with chronic severe asthma. This review article aims at summarizing the evidence regarding various therapeutic modalities for chronic severe asthma and also aims to provide a practical approach to diagnosis and management for the benefit of those who have a specific interest in this problematic condition.

Corticosteroids (inhaled and/or intranasal) in the treatment of respiratory allergy in children: safety vs. efficacy

BACKGROUND

Topical administration of Corticosteroids (CS) can reduce the total dose of CS required to treat the patient and minimize side effects. Topical CS is extremely effective and has an excellent safety profile. Nonetheless, care must be taken when multiple sites such as lungs, nose and skin are being treated. CS mechanisms of action on the inflammatory process are complex. The aim of this study is to review such mechanisms and the adverse events secondary to it.

METHODS

Review English database (Embase, PubMed, Scielo) searching words: CS, adverse events, inhaled CS, intranasal CS, and children.

RESULTS

There is a classic mechanism involving a genomic effect of CS and a non-genomic effect, independently of gene transcription process. This mechanism acts by reducing mucosal blood flow in the asthmatic airways. Second-generation topical CS is the treatment of choice in allergic diseases control because of their good anti-inflammatory activity, poor absorption and first-pass hepatic metabolism. When comparing different CS, it is important to compare therapeutically equivalent doses. Although topical CS reduces systemic side effects, local and even systemic side effects can occur. Many factors affect the amount of drug that reaches the lung, including inhaler technique and inhaler type, fine particle dose and particle distribution.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with allergic diseases respond to CS treatment, but there is a small subset of them whose response is unsatisfactory even with high doses of CS. They are classified as corticosteroid-resistant asthmatics. Pro-inflammatory cytokines appear to up regulate the expression of GRb that has been associated with CS resistance.

The mechanisms, diagnosis, and management of severe asthma in adults

There has been a recent increase in the prevalence of asthma worldwide; however, the 5-10% of patients with severe disease account for a substantial proportion of the health costs. Although most asthma cases can be satisfactorily managed with a combination of anti-inflammatory drugs and bronchodilators, patients who remain symptomatic despite maximum combination treatment represent a heterogeneous group consisting of those who are under-treated or non-adherent with their prescribed medication. After excluding under-treatment and poor compliance, corticosteroid refractory asthma can be identified as a subphenotype characterised by a heightened neutrophilic airway inflammatory response in the presence or absence of eosinophils, with evidence of increased tissue injury and remodelling. Although a wide range of environmental factors such as allergens, smoking, air pollution, infection, hormones, and specific drugs can contribute to this phenotype, other features associated with changes in the airway inflammatory response should be taken into account. Aberrant communication between an injured airway epithelium and underlying mesenchyme contributes to disease chronicity and refractoriness to corticosteroids. The importance of identifying underlying causative factors and the recent introduction of novel therapeutic approaches, including the targeting of immunoglobulin E and tumour necrosis factor alpha with biological agents, emphasise the need for careful phenotyping of patients with severe disease to target improved management of the individual patient's needs.