Expect the Unexpected: A Rare Case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Endocarditis

A Hole in the Heart, a Hole in the Defenses: A Case of Pseudomonas Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but serious infection of the cardiac endothelium. This case report presents a rare instance of left-sided Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis in an immunocompetent patient without traditional risk factors for IE. Pseudomonas endocarditis is uncommon and usually associated with specific factors. The patient in this case was a 30-year-old male with end-stage renal disease, receiving hemodialysis through a tunneled dialysis catheter, who developed a fever. Blood cultures confirmed P. aeruginosa as the causative agent, which prompted the administration of appropriate antibiotics and the removal of the catheter. However, subsequent imaging revealed significant damage to the mitral valve. Despite timely mitral valve replacement and aggressive medical treatment, the patient's condition worsened, and he ultimately succumbed to the infection. This case also emphasizes the necessity of timely diagnosis and intervention. In this patient, by the time it was diagnosed and managed, significant mitral valve damage had already occurred. Therefore, it should be considered a differential diagnosis even in patients with no risk factors and should be managed vigorously. Pseudomonas endocarditis is associated with high mortality, and successful treatment often requires a combination of antipseudomonal antibiotics due to the organism's ability to develop resistance. Surgical intervention, such as valve replacement, is frequently necessary. This case underscores the importance of considering P. aeruginosa infection, even in patients without traditional risk factors for IE. Early diagnosis, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and timely surgical intervention are critical for improving outcomes in Pseudomonas endocarditis cases.

Uncommon pathogens causing infective endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is caused by a wide range of aetiological agents. The microbiology, epidemiology, and treatment of this disease have changed considerably in the last two decades. Staphylococci and streptococci are known to be the classical causative agents; however, blood culture-negative endocarditis caused by fastidious and slow-growing organisms is now common. The list of uncommon pathogens causing endocarditis has expanded in recent years. This is a narrative literature review of the aetiological agents of endocarditis that are rarely encountered in clinical practice, their epidemiology, the characteristics of these pathogens, the clinical presentations of the cases, and their management.

Genomic and metabolic versatility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa contributes to its inter-kingdom transmission and survival

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most versatile bacteria with renowned pathogenicity and extensive drug resistance. The diverse habitats of this bacterium include fresh, saline and drainage waters, soil, moist surfaces, taps, showerheads, pipelines, medical implants, nematodes, insects, plants, animals, birds and humans. The arsenal of virulence factors produced by P. aeruginosa includes pyocyanin, rhamnolipids, siderophores, lytic enzymes, toxins and polysaccharides. All these virulent elements coupled with intrinsic, adaptive and acquired antibiotic resistance facilitate persistent colonization and lethal infections in different hosts. To date, treating pulmonary diseases remains complicated due to the chronic secondary infections triggered by hospital-acquired P. aeruginosa. On the contrary, this bacterium can improve plant growth by suppressing phytopathogens and insects. Notably, P. aeruginosa is one of the very few bacteria capable of trans-kingdom transmission and infection. Transfer of P. aeruginosa strains from plant materials to hospital wards, animals to humans, and humans to their pets occurs relatively often. Recently, we have identified that plant-associated P. aeruginosa strains could be pathologically similar to clinical isolates. In this review, we have highlighted the genomic and metabolic factors that facilitate the dominance of P. aeruginosa across different biological kingdoms and the varying roles of this bacterium in plant and human health.

What Is New in the Anti–Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Development Pipeline Since the 2017 WHO Alert?

The spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a substantial threat to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) are considered “critical-priority” bacteria by the World Health Organization (WHO) since 2017 taking into account criteria such as patient mortality, global burden disease, and worldwide trend of multi-drug resistance (MDR). Indeed P. aeruginosa can be particularly difficult to eliminate from patients due to its combinatory antibiotic resistance, multifactorial virulence, and ability to over-adapt in a dynamic way. Research is active, but the course to a validated efficacy of a new treatment is still long and uncertain. What is new in the anti–P. aeruginosa clinical development pipeline since the 2017 WHO alert? This review focuses on new solutions for P. aeruginosa infections that are in active clinical development, i.e., currently being tested in humans and may be approved for patients in the coming years. Among 18 drugs of interest in December 2021 anti–P. aeruginosa development pipeline described here, only one new combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor is in phase III trial. Derivatives of existing antibiotics considered as “traditional agents” are over-represented. Diverse “non-traditional agents” including bacteriophages, iron mimetic/chelator, and anti-virulence factors are significantly represented but unfortunately still in early clinical stages. Despite decade of efforts, there is no vaccine currently in clinical development to prevent P. aeruginosa infections. Studying pipeline anti–P. aeruginosa since 2017 up to now shows how to provide a new treatment for patients can be a difficult task. Given the process duration, the clinical pipeline remains unsatisfactory leading best case to the approval of new antibacterial drugs that treat CRPA in several years. Beyond investment needed to build a robust pipeline, the Community needs to reinvent medicine with new strategies of development to avoid the disaster. Among “non-traditional agents”, anti-virulence strategy may have the potential through novel and non-killing modes of action to reduce the selective pressure responsible of MDR.

Bacteriophages Combined With Subtherapeutic Doses of Flucloxacillin Act Synergistically Against Staphylococcus aureus Experimental Infective Endocarditis

Background

The potential of phage therapy for the treatment of endovascular Staphylococcus aureus infections remains to be evaluated.

Methods and Results

The efficacy of a phage cocktail combining Herelleviridae phage vB_SauH_2002 and Podoviriae phage 66 was evaluated against a methicillin‐sensitive S. aureus strain in vitro and in vivo in a rodent model of experimental endocarditis. Six hours after bacterial challenge, animals were treated with (1) the phage cocktail. (2) subtherapeutic flucloxacillin dosage, (3) combination of the phage cocktail and flucloxacillin, or (4) saline. Bacterial loads in cardiac vegetations at 30 hours were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were phage loads at 30 hours in cardiac vegetations, blood, spleen, liver, and kidneys. We evaluated phage resistance 30 hours post infection in vegetations of rats under combination treatment. In vitro, phages synergized against S. aureus planktonic cells and the cocktail synergized with flucloxacillin to eradicated biofilms. In infected animals, the phage cocktail achieved bacteriostatic effect. The addition of low‐dose flucloxacillin elevated bacterial suppression (∆ of −5.25 log₁₀ colony forming unit/g [CFU/g] versus treatment onset, P<0.0001) and synergism was confirmed (∆ of −2.15 log₁₀ CFU/g versus low‐dose flucloxacillin alone, P<0.01). Importantly, 9/12 rats given the combination treatment had sterile vegetations at 30 hours. In vivo phage replication was partially suppressed by the antibiotic and selection of resistance to the Podoviridae component of the phage cocktail occurred. Plasma‐mediated inhibition of phage killing activity was observed in vitro.

Conclusions

Combining phages with a low‐dose standard of care antibiotic represents a promising strategy for the treatment of S. aureus infective endocarditis.