A review of clinical failures associated with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Macrolides Decrease the Proinflammatory Activity of Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Over the past 2 decades, the prevalence of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MRSP) has increased considerably, due to widespread macrolide use. Although macrolide usage has been proposed to be associated with treatment failure in patients with pneumococcal diseases, macrolides may be clinically effective for treating these diseases, regardless of the susceptibility of the causative pneumococci to macrolides. As we previously demonstrated that macrolides downregulate the transcription of various genes in MRSP, including the gene encoding the pore-forming toxin pneumolysin, we hypothesized that macrolides affect the proinflammatory activity of MRSP. Using HEK-Blue cell lines, we found that the supernatants from macrolide-treated MRSP cultures induced decreased NF-κB activation in cells expressing Toll-like receptor 2 and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 compared to the supernatants from untreated MRSP cells, suggesting that macrolides inhibit the release of these ligands from MRSP. Real-time PCR analysis revealed that macrolides significantly downregulated the transcription of various genes encoding peptidoglycan synthesis-, lipoteichoic acid synthesis-, and lipoprotein synthesis-related molecules in MRSP cells. The silkworm larva plasma assay demonstrated that the peptidoglycan concentrations in the supernatants from macrolide-treated MRSP cultures were significantly lower than those from untreated MRSP cultures. Triton X-114 phase separation revealed that lipoprotein expression decreased in macrolide-treated MRSP cells compared to the lipoprotein expression in untreated MRSP cells. Consequently, macrolides may decrease the expression of bacterial ligands of innate immune receptors, resulting in the decreased proinflammatory activity of MRSP. IMPORTANCE To date, the clinical efficacy of macrolides in pneumococcal disease is assumed to be linked to their ability to inhibit the release of pneumolysin. However, our previous study demonstrated that oral administration of macrolides to mice intratracheally infected with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae resulted in decreased levels of pneumolysin and proinflammatory cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples compared to the levels in samples from untreated infected control mice, without affecting the bacterial load in the fluid. This finding suggests that additional mechanisms by which macrolides negatively regulate proinflammatory cytokine production may be involved in their efficacy in vivo. Furthermore, in this study, we demonstrated that macrolides downregulated the transcription of various proinflammatory-component-related genes in S. pneumoniae, which provides an additional explanation for the clinical benefits of macrolides.

Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia-Changing Epidemiology, Resistance Patterns, and Newer Antibiotics: Spotlight on Delafloxacin

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality both in the USA and globally. As the burden of CAP continues to increase due to several factors, the advances in its diagnosis, prevention, and treatment have taken on even greater interest and importance. The majority of CAP patients are treated empirically, and selection of appropriate antibiotic treatment is increasingly difficult because the epidemiology of CAP is changing, in part due to antimicrobial resistance, and the causative CAP pathogens differ between countries and regions. There is also an increasing prevalence of chronic co-morbid diseases among CAP patients. Treatment of CAP has become challenging because of these factors along with the varying safety profiles and efficacy of well-established antibiotics, as well as limited new therapeutic options. Recently, however, new antibiotics have been approved, which will expand the treatment options for CAP, particularly in those patients with underlying complications. Recently approved delafloxacin, an anionic fluoroquinolone, has a unique structure and distinct chemical characteristics; it demonstrated non-inferiority to moxifloxacin in a phase III clinical trial, but was shown to be superior to moxifloxacin at early clinical response in CAP patients who also have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma as a co-morbidity, and in CAP patients who may have severe illness. Delafloxacin could offer an additional therapy against resistant isolates and among these difficult-to-treat patients. This review summarizes the development, latest research, and safety profile of the new antibiotic delafloxacin, and its potential future role in the treatment of CAP.

Treatment of severe pneumonia by hinokitiol in a murine antimicrobial-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia model

Streptococcus pneumoniae is often isolated from patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Antibiotics are the primary line of treatment for pneumococcal pneumonia; however, rising antimicrobial resistance is becoming more prevalent. Hinokitiol, which is isolated from trees in the cypress family, has been demonstrated to exert antibacterial activity against S. pneumoniae in vitro regardless of antimicrobial resistance. In this study, the efficacy of hinokitiol was investigated in a mouse pneumonia model. Male 8-week-old BALB/c mice were intratracheally infected with S. pneumoniae strains D39 (antimicrobial susceptible) and NU4471 (macrolide resistant). After 1 h, hinokitiol was injected via the tracheal route. Hinokitiol significantly decreased the number of S. pneumoniae in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and the concentration of pneumococcal DNA in the serum, regardless of whether bacteria were resistant or susceptible to macrolides. In addition, hinokitiol decreased the infiltration of neutrophils in the lungs, as well as the concentration of inflammatory cytokines in the BALF and serum. Repeated hinokitiol injection at 18 h intervals showed downward trend in the number of S. pneumoniae in the BALF and the concentration of S. pneumoniae DNA in the serum with the number of hinokitiol administrations. These findings suggest that hinokitiol reduced bacterial load and suppressed excessive host immune response in the pneumonia mouse model. Accordingly, hinokitiol warrants further exploration as a potential candidate for the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Proton Motive Force Disruptors Block Bacterial Competence and Horizontal Gene Transfer

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a commensal of the human nasopharynx that can also cause severe antibiotic-resistant infections. Antibiotics drive the spread of resistance by inducing S. pneumoniae competence, in which bacteria express the transformation machinery that facilitates uptake of exogenous DNA and horizontal gene transfer (HGT). We performed a high-throughput screen and identified potent inhibitors of S. pneumoniae competence, called COM-blockers. COM-blockers limit competence by inhibiting the proton motive force (PMF), thereby disrupting export of a quorum-sensing peptide that regulates the transformation machinery. Known chemical PMF disruptors and alterations in pH homeostasis similarly inhibit competence. COM-blockers limit transformation of clinical multi-drug-resistant strains and HGT in infected mice. At their active concentrations, COM-blockers do not affect growth, compromise antibiotic activity, or elicit detectable resistance. COM-blockers provide an experimental tool to inhibit competence and other PMF-involved processes and could help reduce the spread of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance in bacteria. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Streptococcus pneumoniae and chronic endobronchial infections in childhood

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is the main cause of bacterial pneumonia worldwide and has been studied extensively in this context. However, its role in chronic endobronchial infections and accompanying lower airway neutrophilic infiltration has received little attention. Severe and recurrent pneumonia are risk factors for chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD) and bronchiectasis; the latter causes considerable morbidity and, in some populations, premature death in children and adults. Protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) is another chronic endobronchial infection associated with substantial morbidity. In some children, PBB may progress to bronchiectasis. Although nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae is the main pathogen in PBB, CSLD and bronchiectasis, pneumococci are isolated commonly from the lower airways of children with these diagnoses. Here we review what is known currently about pneumococci in PBB, CSLD and bronchiectasis, including the importance of pneumococcal nasopharyngeal colonization and how persistence in the lower airways may contribute to the pathogenesis of these chronic pulmonary disorders. Antibiotic treatments, particularly long-term azithromycin therapy, are discussed together with antibiotic resistance and the impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Important areas requiring further investigation are identified, including immune responses associated with pneumococcal lower airway infection, alone and in combination with other respiratory pathogens, and microarray serotyping to improve detection of carriage and infection by multiple serotypes. Genome wide association studies of pneumococci from the upper and lower airways will help identify virulence and resistance determinants, including potential therapeutic targets and vaccine antigens to treat and prevent endobronchial infections. Much work is needed, but the benefits will be substantial.

Bronchiectasis in Children: Current Concepts in Immunology and Microbiology

Bronchiectasis is a complex chronic respiratory condition traditionally characterized by chronic infection, airway inflammation, and progressive decline in lung function. Early diagnosis and intensive treatment protocols can stabilize or even improve the clinical prognosis of children with bronchiectasis. However, understanding the host immunologic mechanisms that contribute to recurrent infection and prolonged inflammation has been identified as an important area of research that would contribute substantially to effective prevention strategies for children at risk of bronchiectasis. This review will focus on the current understanding of the role of the host immune response and important pathogens in the pathogenesis of bronchiectasis (not associated with cystic fibrosis) in children.

The comparative development of elevated resistance to macrolides in community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae

Background

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an acute inflammation of the lungs, which is often caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. CAP is the leading cause of death by infectious disease in industrialized countries. Therefore, an immediate and effective antibiotic therapy is of great importance for the nonfatal outcome of the disease. The literature contains increasing data about the development of resistance to antibiotics that are used for the treatment of CAP caused by S. pneumoniae; this article also examines the possible development of resistance to antibiotics in S. pneumoniae in recent years.

Methods

Within the study period of 2004–2014, all hospital charts from patients with CAP caused by S. pneumoniae were collected from the Department of Internal Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. The tracheal secretions of S. pneumoniae in CAP patients were obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage; bronchial aspirates were obtained through flexible bronchoscopy and directly from sputum, and blood cultures were examined microbiologically for microorganisms.

Results

From a total of 100 patients with CAP caused by S. pneumoniae, 23 (53.49% [34.78% female], 95% confidence interval, 38.58–68.4) patients with a mean age of 59.78±15.77 years met the inclusion criteria of this investigation. These patients were compared to a total of 20 (46.51% [35% female], 95% confidence interval, 31.6–61.42) patients with a mean age of 58.9±13.36 years with CAP who were infested with S. pneumoniae. In the latter group, the streptococcal antigen was detected in pulmonary aspirations by bronchoscopy or in urine using polymerase chain reaction and a rapid pneumococcal test. Penicillin G and vancomycin had a high rate of sensitivity on the antibiogram for S. pneumoniae, which was obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial aspirates through flexible bronchoscopy, and directly from sputum. Even though the rates obtained were without statistical significance, S. pneumoniae had a high resistance to macrolides, namely erythromycin, in patients with CAP. Macrolides, specifically erythromycin (17.39%) and azithromycin (4.35%) and other classes of antibiotics such as tetracycline (4.35%), had a statistically significant resistance to streptococcal pneumonia in patients with CAP (P=0.0009).

Conclusion

Increased resistance was found for macrolides and tetracycline in patients with CAP by S. pneumoniae.

Clinical cure rates in subjects treated with azithromycin for community-acquired respiratory tract infections caused by azithromycin-susceptible or azithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: analysis of Phase 3 clinical trial data

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTI) are commonly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (SPN) and empirically treated with azithromycin. This study assessed clinical cure rates in azithromycin-treated subjects with CARTI caused by azithromycin-susceptible (Azi-S) or azithromycin-resistant (Azi-R) SPN.

METHODS

1127 subjects with CARTI (402 acute otitis media, 309 community-acquired pneumonia, 255 acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and 161 acute bacterial sinusitis) in 13 Phase 3 clinical trials (1993-2007) had a confirmed pathogen, received azithromycin and were assessed for clinical cure/failure. 34.4% of subjects (388/1127) had a positive culture for SPN; 33.4% (376/1127) had Azi-S or Azi-R SPN.

RESULTS

28.9% (112/388) of subjects with SPN had Azi-R SPN: 35.7% (40/112) were low-level Azi-R SPN (LLAR; MIC 2-8 mg/L), while 64.3% (72/112) were high-level Azi-R SPN (HLAR; MIC ≥16 mg/L). Among Azi-S and Azi-R SPN CARTI subjects, clinical cure rates were: 86.2% (324/376) overall; 89.4% (236/264) for subjects with Azi-S SPN; 78.6% (88/112) for subjects with Azi-R SPN (P = 0.003, versus Azi-S); 77.5% (31/40) for subjects with LLAR SPN (P < 0.001); and 79.2% (57/72) for subjects with HLAR SPN (P = 0.122).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical cure rates in CARTI subjects treated with azithromycin were higher for Azi-S SPN (89.4%) versus Azi-R SPN (78.6%; P = 0.003). However, cure rates were not different for subjects infected with LLAR-SPN versus HLAR-SPN. At the observed prevalence of Azi-R SPN of 28.9%, an additional 3.1 clinical failures would be predicted, as a consequence of azithromycin resistance (LLAR and HLAR), per 100 subjects treated empirically with azithromycin.

Risks of population antimicrobial resistance associated with chronic macrolide use for inflammatory airway diseases

Macrolide antibiotics have established efficacy in the management of cystic fibrosis and diffuse panbronchiolitis-uncommon lung diseases with substantial morbidity and the potential for rapid progression to death. Emerging evidence suggests benefits of maintenance macrolide treatment in more indolent respiratory diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. In view of the greater patient population affected by these disorders (and potential for macrolide use to spread to disorders such as chronic cough), widespread use of macrolides, particularly azithromycin, has the potential to substantially influence antimicrobial resistance rates of a range of respiratory microbes. In this Personal View, I explore theories around population (rather than patient) macrolide resistance, appraise evidence linking macrolide use with development of resistance, and highlight the risks posed by injudicious broadening of their use, particularly of azithromycin. These risks are weighed against the potential benefits of macrolides in less aggressive inflammatory airway disorders. A far-sighted approach to maintenance macrolide use in non-cystic fibrosis inflammatory airway diseases is needed, which minimises risks of adversely affecting community macrolide resistance: combining preferential use of erythromycin and restriction of macrolide use to those patients at greatest risk represents an appropriately cautious management approach.

Azithromycin for Indigenous children with bronchiectasis: study protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD) and bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis (CF) among Indigenous children in Australia, New Zealand and Alaska is very high. Antibiotics are a major component of treatment and are used both on a short or long-term basis. One aim of long-term or maintenance antibiotics is to reduce the frequency of acute pulmonary exacerbations and symptoms. However, there are few studies investigating the efficacy of long-term antibiotic use for CSLD and non-CF bronchiectasis among children. This study tests the hypothesis that azithromycin administered once a week as maintenance antibiotic treatment will reduce the rate of pulmonary exacerbations in Indigenous children with bronchiectasis.

METHODS/DESIGN

We are conducting a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial in Australia and New Zealand. Inclusion criteria are: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, Maori or Pacific Island children aged 1 to 8 years, diagnosed with bronchiectasis (or probable bronchiectasis) with no underlying disease identified (such as CF or primary immunodeficiency), and having had at least one episode of pulmonary exacerbation in the last 12 months. After informed consent, children are randomised to receive either azithromycin (30 mg/kg once a week) or placebo (once a week) for 12-24 months from study entry. Primary outcomes are the rate of pulmonary exacerbations and time to pulmonary exacerbation determined by review of patient medical records. Secondary outcomes include length and severity of pulmonary exacerbation episodes, changes in growth, school loss, respiratory symptoms, forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV(1); for children ≥6 years), and sputum characteristics. Safety endpoints include serious adverse events. Antibiotic resistance in respiratory bacterial pathogens colonising the nasopharynx is monitored. Data derived from medical records and clinical assessments every 3 to 4 months for up to 24 months from study entry are recorded on standardised forms.

DISCUSSION

Should this trial demonstrate that azithromycin is efficacious in reducing the number of pulmonary exacerbations, it will provide a much-needed rationale for the use of long-term antibiotics in the medical management of bronchiectasis in Indigenous children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12610000383066.

Dominance of multidrug resistant CC271 clones in macrolide-resistant streptococcus pneumoniae in Arizona

BACKGROUND

Rates of resistance to macrolide antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae are rising around the world due to the spread of mobile genetic elements harboring mef(E) and erm(B) genes and post-vaccine clonal expansion of strains that carry them.

RESULTS

Characterization of 592 clinical isolates collected in Arizona over a 10 year period shows 23.6% are macrolide resistant. The largest portion of the macrolide-resistant population, 52%, is dual mef(E)/erm(B)-positive. All dual-positive isolates are multidrug-resistant clonal lineages of Taiwan19F-14, mostly multilocus sequence type 320, carrying the recently described transposon Tn2010. The remainder of the macrolide resistant S. pneumoniae collection includes 31% mef(E)-positive, and 9% erm(B)-positive strains.

CONCLUSIONS

The dual-positive, multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae clones have likely expanded by switching to non-vaccine serotypes after the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine release, and their success limits therapy options. This upsurge could have a considerable clinical impact in Arizona.

Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--summary

This document is an update of Guidelines published in 2005 and now includes scientific publications through to May 2010. It provides evidence-based recommendations for the most common management questions occurring in routine clinical practice in the management of adult patients with LRTI. Topics include management outside hospital, management inside hospital (including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis) and prevention. The target audience for the Guideline is thus all those whose routine practice includes the management of adult LRTI.

Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version

This document is an update of Guidelines published in 2005 and now includes scientific publications through to May 2010. It provides evidence-based recommendations for the most common management questions occurring in routine clinical practice in the management of adult patients with LRTI. Topics include management outside hospital, management inside hospital (including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis) and prevention. Background sections and graded evidence tables are also included. The target audience for the Guideline is thus all those whose routine practice includes the management of adult LRTI.

Annual macrolide prescription rates and the emergence of macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada from 1995 to 2005

Over the last 20 years, Canadian pneumococcal surveillance studies have documented a steady rise in macrolide resistance. In the current study, we probed the nature of associations between the emergence of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada and changes in macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin and erythromycin) prescription rates. Macrolide susceptibility testing data for respiratory tract isolates of S. pneumoniae (n=15109) were acquired from two published national Canadian surveillance databases, and dispensed outpatient macrolide prescription data were acquired from the proprietary Intercontinental Medical Statistics (IMS) Health Canada CompuScript database. Nationally, macrolide resistance increased from 3.7% in 1995 to 19.0% in 2005 (P=0.003) as the annual macrolide prescription rate increased from 106.7 to 123.2 prescriptions/1000 persons per year (P=0.003). From 1995 to 2005, azithromycin and clarithromycin prescriptions increased from 4.8 to 52.5 prescriptions/1000 persons per year (P<0.0001) and from 24.7 to 58.4 prescriptions/1000 persons per year (P=0.005), respectively, whilst erythromycin prescriptions decreased from 77.2 to 12.3 prescriptions/1000 persons per year (P<0.0001). By univariate regression analysis, increasing rates of azithromycin (R(2)=0.931; P<0.0001) and clarithromycin (R(2)=0.725; P=0.0009) prescriptions and a decreasing rate of erythromycin prescriptions (R(2)=-0.963; P<0.0001) were all associated with increasing macrolide resistance from 1995 to 2005. Multivariate regression analysis showed that a model including all three macrolide prescription rates provided the best fit to the trend of increasing macrolide resistance. When the data were analysed by provincial origin, no statistically significant associations were found between prescription rates of any macrolide and macrolide resistance rates by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. We conclude that increasing macrolide resistance among respiratory isolates of pneumococci in Canada from 1995 to 2005 was associated both with decreasing prescriptions for erythromycin and concurrent increases in prescriptions for azithromycin and clarithromycin (azithromycin>clarithromycin by univariate regression analysis). Resistance development is complex and factors other than macrolide use may also be associated with observed increases in macrolide resistance in Canada from 1995 to 2005.

Trends in antibacterial resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated in the USA: update from PROTEKT US Years 1-4

Background

The increasing prevalence of resistance to established antibiotics among key bacterial respiratory tract pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, is a major healthcare problem in the USA. The PROTEKT US study is a longitudinal surveillance study designed to monitor the susceptibility of key respiratory tract pathogens in the USA to a range of commonly used antimicrobials. Here, we assess the geographic and temporal trends in antibacterial resistance of S. pneumoniae isolates from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections collected between Year 1 (2000–2001) and Year 4 (2003–2004) of PROTEKT US.

Methods

Antibacterial minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined centrally using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method; susceptibility was defined according to CLSI interpretive criteria. Macrolide resistance genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction.

Results

A total of 39,495 S. pneumoniae isolates were collected during 2000–2004. The percentage of isolates resistant to erythromycin, penicillin, levofloxacin, and telithromycin were 29.3%, 21.2%, 0.9%, and 0.02%, respectively, over the 4 years, with marked regional variability. The proportion of isolates exhibiting multidrug resistance (includes isolates known as penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and isolates resistant to ≥ 2 of the following antibiotics: penicillin; second-generation cephalosporins, e.g. cefuroxime; macrolides; tetracyclines; and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) remained stable at ~30% over the study period. Overall mef(A) was the most common macrolide resistance mechanism. The proportion of mef(A) isolates decreased from 68.8% to 62.3% between Year 1 and Year 4, while the percentage of isolates carrying both erm(B) and mef(A) increased from 9.7% to 18.4%. Over 99% of the erm(B)+mef(A)-positive isolates collected over Years 1–4 exhibited multidrug resistance. Higher than previously reported levels of macrolide resistance were found for mef(A)-positive isolates.

Conclusion

Over the first 4 years of PROTEKT US, penicillin and erythromycin resistance among pneumococcal isolates has remained high. Although macrolide resistance rates have stabilized, the prevalence of clonal isolates, with a combined erm(B) and mef(A) genotype together with high-level macrolide and multidrug resistance, is increasing, and their spread may have serious health implications. Telithromycin and levofloxacin both showed potent in vitro activity against S. pneumoniae isolates irrespective of macrolide resistance genotype.

Activity of the Diaminopyrimidine AR-709 against recently collected multidrug-resistant isolates of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae from North America

Broth microdilution was used to determine the MICs of AR-709 and comparator antimicrobial agents for 224 invasive multidrug-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. AR-709 was highly active, with a MIC 50 of 0.25 microg/ml, a MIC 90 of 0.5 microg/ml, and a range of <or=0.008 microg/ml to 1 microg/ml.

Regional trends in β-lactam, macrolide, fluoroquinolone and telithromycin resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates 2001–2004

OBJECTIVES

To determine global antibacterial resistance rates among community-acquired isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2004, 20,142 S. pneumoniae isolates from 151 centres in 40 countries were collected and tested for susceptibility to common antibacterials in the PROTEKT surveillance study.

RESULTS

The prevalence of beta-lactam and macrolide resistance did not change, but there was marked geographic variability. The most common macrolide resistance mechanism was ribosomal methylation mediated by erm(B), except in Canada, Greece and the USA where drug efflux mediated by mef(A) was predominant. The erythromycin minimum inhibitory concentration for mef(A) isolates increased significantly (P<0.001; chi2 test). The global prevalence of macrolide-resistant isolates positive for both erm(B) and mef(A) was 12.0% in 2003-2004; erm(B)+mef(A) strains were particularly common in South Korea (40.8%), South Africa (46.4%) and the USA (29.6%). Telithromycin was the most active antibacterial tested. Over the studied period, > or = 99.7% of all isolates and > 99% of erythromycin-resistant isolates, irrespective of genotype, were susceptible to telithromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the high worldwide prevalence of resistance to commonly used antibacterial agents and multiple resistance phenotypes among clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae and suggest that high-level macrolide resistance is continuing to increase in most countries.

Genotypes and related factors reflecting macrolide resistance in pneumococcal pneumonia infections in Japan

Although macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains possessing either the ermB or mefA gene are very common in Japan, clinical and microbial factors in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by different macrolide resistance genotypes have not been evaluated. A multicenter study of CAP caused by S. pneumoniae was performed in Japan from 2003 to 2005. A total of 156 isolates were tested for susceptibility to antibiotics correlated with ermB and mefA genotyping. Independent relationships between tested variables and possession of either the ermB or the mefA gene were identified. Of 156 isolates, 127 (81.4%) were resistant to erythromycin, with the following distribution of resistance genotypes: ermB alone (50.0%), mefA alone (23.7%), and both ermB and mefA (7.1%). All isolates were susceptible to telithromycin. By multivariate analysis, oxygen saturation of <90% on admission increased the risk for ermB-positive pneumococcal pneumonia (odds ratio [OR]=11.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.30 to 95.0; P=0.03), but there were no associations with mefA or with ermB mefA positivity. Penicillin nonsusceptibility was associated with mefA-positive and with ermB- and mefA-positive isolates (OR=14.2; 95% CI=4.27 to 46.9; P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively) but not with ermB-positive isolates. The overall patient mortality was 5.1%. Mortality, the duration of hospitalization, and the resolution of several clinical markers were not associated with the different erythromycin resistance genotypes. In Japan, S. pneumoniae with erythromycin resistance or possession of ermB, mefA, or both genes was highly prevalent in patients with CAP. The risk factors for ermB-positive, mefA-positive, and double ermB-mefA-positive pneumococcal pneumonia were different, but the clinical outcomes did not differ.

Clinical implications of macrolide resistance in community-acquired respiratory tract infections

Laboratory surveillance data suggest that macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae has increased dramatically over the past 15 years. This review examines the specifics of macrolide resistance and the clinical relevance of in vitro susceptibility testing in light of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of azithromycin and clarithromycin. These drugs concentrate extensively within respiratory tissue and have other positive characteristics not reflected by in vitro susceptibility testing. In general, clarithromycin is the most potent macrolide and the one most likely to maintain clinical efficacy against the low-level resistance associated with most macrolide-resistant pneumococci in the USA. These findings suggest that susceptibility data may underestimate clinical utility and that clarithromycin still has a place in the empiric treatment of respiratory infections.

Disease severity in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is greater in patients infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae than in those infected with Haemophilus influenzae

BACKGROUND

Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae are the most common causative pathogens in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. A post hoc pooled analysis of four multinational Phase III clinical trials was conducted to compare disease severity in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis caused by S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis clinician-assessed symptom severity and radiologic findings (total opacity, mucosal thickening, and air-fluid levels on maxillary sinus x-rays). Specimens for bacteriologic identification were collected by maxillary sinus tap, or by selective middle meatal cultures (sinus aspirates or swabs).

RESULTS

Compared with patients infected with H. influenzae (n = 106), patients infected with S. pneumoniae (n = 143) showed a statistically significant higher incidence of severe disease (39.2% vs 23.6%, P = 0.0097) and total opacity (46.2% vs 29.2%, P = 0.0085). Mucosal thickening (47.6% vs 56.6%, P = 0.1616) and air-fluid levels (49% vs 56.6%, P = 0.2500) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, infection with S. pneumoniae is associated with more severe clinical symptoms and radiographic total opacification findings than infection with H. influenzae.

[Antibiotherapy for acute CAP in adults]

Community acquired pneumonia is one of the most frequent infections. With time, bacterial epidemiology and bacterial resistance evolve and new antibiotics become available. So an up-date on adequate antibiotic use is necessary. We reviewed the epidemiology of pneumonia and the evolution of bacterial resistance. We also collected data on new antibiotics which can be used for this infection such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, telithromycin, and pristinamycin. All these drugs are effective on bacteria involved in pneumonia. At this time, only few Streptococcus pneumoniae strains have developed resistance to these drugs. However, resistance to fluoroquinolones is not easily detected with common laboratory techniques. There is no effectiveness difference between the 2 new fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) in clinical studies. However, in bacteriological and pharmacological studies, moxifloxacin seems to be more effective than levofloxacin (500 mg/day). For the treatment of pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila, fluoroquinolones are now widely recommended. For Streptococcus pneumonia, amoxicillin remain the drug of choice, even for bacteria with a decreased susceptibility to penicillin. The importance of treating atypical pathogens remains to be documented.

Oral antibiotic therapy of serious systemic infections

Traditionally, antibiotics have been administered intravenously (IV) for serious systemic infections. As more potent oral antibiotics were introduced, and their pharmacokinetic aspects studied, orally administered antibiotics have been increasingly used for serious systemic infections. Antibiotics ideal for oral administration are those that have the appropriate spectrum, high degree of activity against the presumed or known pathogen, and have good bioavailability. Oral antibiotics with high bioavailability, that is > or = 90% absorbed, achieve serum/tissue concentrations comparable to IV administered antibiotics at the same dose. The popularity of "IV to PO switch therapy" is possible because of the availability of many potent oral antibiotics with high bioavailability. Initial IV therapy is appropriate in patients who are in shock/have impaired intestinal absorption, but after clinical defervescence, completion of therapy should be accomplished with oral antibiotics. As experience with "IV to PO switch therapy" has accumulated, confidence in oral antimicrobics for therapy of serious systemic infections has continued to increase. The trend in treating serious systemic infections entirely with oral antimicrobial therapy will continue, and is clearly the wave of the future.

Antimicrobial therapy of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Antibiotic resistance among pneumococci, enterococci, and staphylococci has become increasingly important in recent decades. Clinicians should be familiar with the nuances of antibiotic susceptibility testing and interpretation in selecting antibiotics for these infections. The clinical significance of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae, and multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae is discussed. The clinical spectrum and therapeutic approach to Enterococcus faecalis (i.e., vancomycin-sensitive enterococci) and E faecium (i.e., vancomycin-resistant enterococci) are discussed. Differences in therapeutic approach between methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) infections are reviewed. Differences between in vitro susceptibility testing and in vivo effectiveness of antibiotics for hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) are described. Finally, the clinical features of infection and therapy of HA-MRSA and community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections are compared.

Antibiothérapie des pneumonies aiguës communautaires à Streptococcus pneumoniae : impact clinique de la résistance bactérienne

The emergence of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams and with multiple drug resistance has not led to major changes in recommendations for antibiotic therapy in patients with acute community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. Numerous factors explain the limited clinical impact of this major microbiological change. The frequency of intermediate strains is high but the frequency of resistant strains to beta-lactams is very low. There is a complex relation between the acquisition of resistance to beta-lactams and the decreased virulence of S. pneumoniae strains. The only finding in studies of humanized experimental animal models of lethal bacteremic pneumonia caused by resistance and tolerant strains was a slowing in the kinetics of beta-lactams bactericidal activity, especially for amoxicillin. Taken together, this preclinical data shows that microbiological resistance of pneumococci to beta-lactams has very little influence on a possible failure of recommanded treatment regimens for pneumococcal pneumonia. The high rate of multiple drug resistance, particularly among beta-lactam resistant strains, rules out the probabilistic use of macrolides. Conversely, fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance remains low, inferior to 3%, and the same is true for ketolides (<1%). Only a global strategy of patient management in the use of these new drugs could ensure their long-term activity. The high mortality rate of hospitalized S. pneumoniae pneumonia will only be improved with a better understanding of the complex host-bacteria interactions.

Controversies in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia remains an important cause of disease and death both in the developed and the developing worlds, despite the ready availability of potent antimicrobial agents to which the organisms remain susceptible. Furthermore, disease management is complicated by emerging resistance of the common pathogens to the various classes of commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. Much recent research in the field of community-acquired pneumonia has focused attention on optimal treatment, evaluating the impact of antibiotic resistance, as well as of antimicrobial choices, on the outcome of these infections. In addition, efforts have been directed towards finding adjunctive therapies to antibiotics that may improve the prognosis of these patients. This article reviews some of these research areas, highlighting controversies that still exist with regard to final recommendations, and in particular with regard to infections with Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common bacterial cause of community-acquired pneumonia.

The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among upper respiratory tract pathogens. Resistance to beta-lactam drugs among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes is increasing. As safe and well-tolerated antibiotics, macrolides play a key role in the treatment of community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Their broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive cocci, such as S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, atypical pathogens, H. influenzae (azithromycin and clarithromycin), and Moraxella catarrhalis, has led to the widespread use of macrolides for empiric treatment of upper RTIs and as alternatives for patients allergic to beta-lactams. Macrolide resistance is increasing among pneumococci and recently among S. pyogenes, and is associated with increasing use of the newer macrolides, such as azithromycin. Ribosomal target modification mediated by erm(A) and erm(B) genes and active efflux due to mef(A) and mef(E) are the principal mechanisms of resistance in both S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Recently, ribosomal protein and RNA mutations have been found to be responsible for acquired resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and H. influenzae. Although macrolides are only weakly active against macrolide-resistant streptococci species, producing an efflux pump (mef), and are inactive against pathogens with ribosomal target modification (erm), treatment failures are uncommon. Therefore, macrolide therapy, for now, remains a good alternative for treatment of upper RTIs; however, continuous monitoring of the local resistance patterns is essential.

Optimal pharmacological therapy for community-acquired pneumonia: the role of dual antibacterial therapy

The optimal pharmacological therapy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most ardently debated issues in medicine. Presently, most guidelines recommend either a fluoroquinolone alone or dual therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide in patients hospitalised with CAP, but few provide clinicians with specific considerations for selecting from these agents. Despite a similar spectrum of activity and favourable resistance patterns (for fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins) against CAP pathogens, there is emerging evidence that dual therapy may be superior to monotherapy in certain populations.In patients with non-severe CAP, the evidence supports the use of either monotherapy or dual therapy in most patients; however, patients with severe CAP or bacteraemic pneumococcal CAP experience improved survival when treated with dual therapy. It is unclear from this evidence if any specific combination of agents is the most effective, but the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide is the most extensively studied. Dual therapy was superior to monotherapy irrespective of the susceptibility of the aetiological pathogen, thus insufficient antimicrobial spectrum does not explain the disparity. The most likely explanation for improved outcomes with dual therapy is the combined effect of optimised antimicrobial spectrum (including atypicals), decreased impact of resistance to a single agent and the immunomodulatory effects of macrolides. Increasing resistance in patients with non-severe CAP warrants the consideration of dual therapy and perhaps a reappraisal of agents usually reserved for second-line therapy, including doxycycline, in these populations as well. In light of the available evidence, dual therapy should be strongly considered in all patients with severe CAP, especially when complicated by pneumococcal bacteraemia.

Penicillins for Treatment of Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Does In Vitro Resistance Really Matter?

BACKGROUND

The rate of in vitro bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents is escalating among pathogens that cause the most serious respiratory tract infections. Many reports published during the past few years suggest that this has direct clinical implications. In particular, resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to beta-lactam antibiotic therapy has assumed a prominent role in the evolution of guidelines for the initial treatment of respiratory tract infection.

METHODS

I conducted a critical review of the published medical literature.

RESULTS

There is only a single report of documented microbiologic failure of parenteral penicillin-class antibiotics in the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in patients with or without bacteremia, whereas there are numerous well-documented reports of treatment failure with quinolone-class (n > or = 21) and macrolide-class (n > or = 33) antibiotics in the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

The recommended optimal in-hospital therapy for community-acquired pneumonia should continue to be a beta-lactam antibiotic (penicillin, aminopenicillin, cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone) administered with a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone agent for adjunctive treatment of infection with potential atypical pathogens.

Bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia associated with macrolide failure

Despite rising rates of macrolide resistance to Streptococcus pneumoniae, the current guidelines for outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia include a macrolide as initial empiric therapy. There have only been a few previously documented cases of macrolide treatment failure in community-acquired pneumonia and there is controversy as to whether macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae is clinically important. Reported here are two cases of community-acquired pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae, one of which was fatal, that failed to respond to clarithromycin.

A review of guidelines for antibacterial use in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) affect a significant proportion of the adult population worldwide and are associated with a substantial socioeconomic burden. The majority of episodes of AECB are bacterial in aetiology and patients are generally treated empirically with orally administered antibacterial agents. Guidelines for the management of AECB have been developed by a number of national health authorities and international organisations, with the aim of promoting rational selection of antibacterial therapy to minimise the risk of treatment failure and subsequent hospitalisation while containing the development and spread of antibacterial resistance. This paper reviews a number of recently published or updated AECB treatment guidelines, focusing on patient stratification strategies, antibacterial treatment recommendations, and newer antibacterial treatment options, including respiratory fluoroquinolones and the ketolide telithromycin, which have recently been added to a number of national treatment guidelines.

The Sentinel Project: an update on the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in community-acquired respiratory Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus spp. in Italy

A total of 460 Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus spp. collected from respiratory infections during 2000 was tested for their susceptibility to 15 selected antibiotics. Overall, penicillin resistance among pneumococci was 10.5%, while lack of susceptibility to macrolides, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline and chloramphenicol reached 35.2%, 26.2%, 22.6% and 6.0%, respectively. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and levofloxacin were the most potent compounds (100% and 99.9% susceptible strains, respectively). Among isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae, beta-lactamase production (12.5% and 10%, respectively), and co-trimoxazole (19.9% and 40.0%) and clarithromycin (11.2% and 40.0%) resistance were the prevalent threats. This study confirms the trend observed in Italy since 1992: macrolide resistance among respiratory microorganisms is increasing, while several drugs including amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, third generation injectable cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones remain active on the great majority of these pathogens.

Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum and epithelial lining fluid against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for which telithromycin MICs vary

The present study, using an in vitro model, assessed telithromycin pharmacodynamic activity at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum (S) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Two macrolide-susceptible (PCR negative for both mefE and ermB) and 11 efflux-producing macrolide-resistant [PCR-positive for mefE and negative for ermB) S. pneumoniae strains with various telithromycin MICs (0.015 to 1 microg/ml) were tested. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of telithromycin were modeled, simulating a dosage of 800 mg orally once daily administered at time 0 and at 24 h (free-drug maximum concentration [C(max)] in serum, 0.7 microg/ml; half-life [t(1/2)], 10 h; free-drug C(max) in ELF, 6.0 microg/ml; t(1/2), 10 h). Starting inocula were 10(6) CFU/ml in Mueller-Hinton Broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log(10) CFU/ml versus initial inoculum). Free-telithromycin concentrations in serum achieved in the model were C(max) 0.9 +/- 0.08 microg/ml, area under the curve to MIC (AUC(0-24 h)) 6.4 +/- 1.5 microg . h/ml, and t(1/2) of 10.6 +/- 0.6 h. Telithromycin-free ELF concentrations achieved in the model were C(max) 6.6 +/- 0.8 microg/ml, AUC(0-24 h) 45.5 +/- 5.5 microg . h/ml, and t(1/2) of 10.5 +/- 1.7 h. Free-telithromycin S and ELF concentrations rapidly eradicated efflux-producing macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae with telithromycin MICs up to and including 0.25 microg/ml and 1 microg/ml, respectively. Free-telithromycin S and ELF concentrations simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 3.5 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 25 completely eradicated (> or =4 log(10) killing) macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h. Free-telithromycin concentrations in serum simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 1.8 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 12.5 were bacteriostatic (0.1 to 0.2 log(10) killing) against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h. In conclusion, free-telithromycin concentrations in serum and ELF simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 3.5 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 25 completely eradicated (> or =4 log(10) killing) macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h.

The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among upper respiratory tract pathogens. Resistance to beta-lactam drugs among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes is increasing. As safe and well-tolerated antibiotics, macrolides play a key role in the treatment of community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Their broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive cocci, such as S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, atypical pathogens, H. influenzae (azithromycin and clarithromycin), and Moraxella catarrhalis, has led to the widespread use of macrolides for empiric treatment of upper RTIs and as alternatives for patients allergic to b-lactams. Macrolide resistance is increasing among pneumococci and recently among S. pyogenes, and is associated with increasing use of the newer macrolides, such as azithromycin. Ribosomal target modification mediated by erm(A) and erm(B) genes and active efflux due to mef(A) and mef(E) are the principal mechanisms of resistance in S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Recently, ribosomal protein and RNA mutations have been found responsible for acquired resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and H. influenzae. Although macrolides are only weakly active against macrolide-resistant streptococci species producing an efflux pump (mef) and are inactive against pathogens with ribosomal target modification (erm), treatment failures are uncommon. Therefore, macrolide therapy, for now, remains a good alternative for treatment of upper RTIs; however, continuous monitoring of the local resistance patterns is essential.

Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations

BACKGROUND

The association between macrolide resistance mechanisms and ketolide bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae remains poorly studied. The present study, using an in vitro model, assessed telithromycin pharmacodynamic activity against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two macrolide-susceptible [PCR-negative for both mef(A) and erm(B)] and six macrolide-resistant [five mef(A)-positive/erm(B)-negative displaying various degrees of macrolide resistance and one mef(A)-negative/erm(B)-positive] S. pneumoniae were tested. Telithromycin was modelled simulating a dosage of 800 mg by mouth once daily [free serum: maximum concentration (C(max)) 0.7 mg/L, t(1/2) 10 h; and free ELF: C(max) 6.0 mg/L, t(1/2) 10 h]. Starting inocula were 1 x 10(6) cfu/mL in Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log(10) cfu/mL versus initial inoculum).

RESULTS

Telithromycin free serum concentrations achieved in the model were: C(max) 0.9+/-0.08 mg/L, AUC(0-24) 6.4+/-1.5 mg.h/L and t(1/2) of 10.6+/-1.6 h. Telithromycin free ELF concentrations achieved in the model were: C(max) 6.6+/-0.8 mg/L, AUC(0-24) 45.5+/-5.5 mg.h/L and t(1/2) of 10.5+/-1.7 h. At 2 h, free serum telithromycin concentrations achieved a 1.0-1.9 log(10) reduction in inoculum compared with a 3.0-3.3 log(10) reduction with free ELF versus macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. Free telithromycin serum and ELF concentrations simulating C(max)/MIC > or =14.1 and area under the curve to MIC (AUC(0-24)/MIC) > or =100 [time above the MIC (t > MIC) of 100%], were bactericidal (> or =3 log(10) killing) at 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h versus macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae.

CONCLUSION

Telithromycin serum and ELF concentrations rapidly eradicated macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae regardless of resistance phenotype. Achieving C(max)/MIC > or =14.1 and AUC(0-24)/MIC > or =100 resulted in bactericidal activity at 4 h with no regrowth over 48 h.