Teicoplanin hypersensitivity syndrome

Adverse reactions to vancomycin and cross-reactivity with other antibiotics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glycopeptide antibiotics such as vancomycin are frequently utilized to treat resistant Gram-positive infections such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The current literature on glycopeptide and lipoglycopeptide structure, hypersensitivity and potential cross-reactivity was reviewed, highlighting implications for safe prescribing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Structurally similar, glycopeptides could theoretically cross-react. Immediate reactions to vancomycin include non-IgE-mediated reactions (e.g. red man syndrome) and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity (e.g. anaphylaxis), sharing clinical features. Vancomycin can activate mast cells via MAS-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2, an IgE-independent receptor implicated in non-IgE reactions. In-vivo and in-vitro testing for suspected IgE-mediated reactions to glycopeptides remain ill-defined. Vancomycin is increasingly recognized to cause severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) predominantly reported. Vancomycin DRESS has been associated with HLA-A32:-01, with a number needed to prevent of 1 in 74. Data demonstrating cross-reactivity amongst glycopeptides and lipoglycopeptides is limited to case reports/series.

SUMMARY

Further studies and in-vivo/in-vitro diagnostics are required for better differentiation between IgE and non-IgE glycopeptide reactions. Despite its association with vanomycin DRESS, utility of pharmacogenomic screening for HLA-A32: 01 is ill-defined. Although HLA-A32:01 has been associated with vancomycin DRESS, its utility for pharmacogenomic screening is ill defined. Further clinical and immunological cross-reactivity data for glycopeptide/lipoglycopeptide antibiotics is required.

DRESS Syndrome Caused by Cross-reactivity Between Vancomycin and Subsequent Teicoplanin Administration: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a potentially life-threatening syndrome comprising severe skin eruption, fever, eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, and involvement of internal organs. Here, we describe a case of DRESS syndrome caused by cross-reactivity between vancomycin and subsequent teicoplanin administration. CASE REPORT A 79-year-old male was admitted to our hospital for the treatment of injuries incurred in a traffic accident. Eosinophilia and lung dysfunction appeared after vancomycin administration. These symptoms were improved temporarily by withdrawal of vancomycin and administration of corticosteroid, but exacerbated by subsequent teicoplanin administration. These symptoms disappeared after discontinuation of teicoplanin. Based on comprehensive assessment of the overall clinical course, we judged that DRESS syndrome was induced by cross-reactivity between vancomycin and subsequent teicoplanin administration. Using the European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) scoring system, we categorized DRESS syndrome related to vancomycin and teicoplanin as "probable." We describe, for the first time, DRESS syndrome (defined using the RegiSCAR scoring system) caused by cross-reactivity between vancomycin and subsequent teicoplanin administration. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians should be aware that DRESS syndrome can be induced by cross-reactivity between vancomycin and teicoplanin.

Dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria

Dalbavancin is a new lipoglycopeptide antibiotic in late-stage clinical development as a once-weekly treatment for serious infections including skin and skin structure infections. Its in vitro potency is greater than that of vancomycin, with a MIC(90) of 0.06 mg/l for Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (irrespective of oxacillin susceptibility), 0.06-0.12 mg/l for vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus spp. and 0.003 mg/l or less for Streptococcus pneumoniae or beta-hemolytic streptococci. Dalbavancin has dual routes of elimination. The results of Phase II/III studies show clinical efficiency in complicated skin and skin structure infection. During clinical trials, dalbavancin was as effective as linezolid or vancomycin in the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infection, including those with methicillin-resistant S. aureus. An additional Phase II study demonstrated efficacy in catheter-related bacteremia. Other preliminary in vitro and in vivo data have identified putative interest of dalbavancin in endocarditis, osteitis, diabetic foot, respiratory tract or joint infection.

Measurement of teicoplanin by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: development of a novel method

BACKGROUND

Teicoplanin is an antibiotic used for the treatment of endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Teicoplanin is emerging as a suitable alternative antibiotic to vancomycin, where their trough serum levels are monitored by immunoassay routinely. This is the first report detailing the development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for measuring teicoplanin in patients' serum.

METHODS

An Acquity™ UPLC (ultra-pressure liquid chromatography) tandem mass spectrometer was used to measure teicoplanin concentrations in samples from patients, quality assurance schemes and quality control preparations. Ristocetin was successfully implemented as a suitable internal standard. Ion suppression, linearity, stability, matrix effects, recovery, imprecision, lower limits of quantification and detection, interference and method comparison against immunoassay were all assessed.

RESULTS

Teicoplanin and ristocetin had elution times of 1.39 and 1.24 min, respectively. Ion suppression was shown to be negligible, and linear calibration curves (0-200 μg/mL) were consistently reproduced to have r(2) values >0.99. Postextraction stability was achieved up to 20 h, while matrix effects were minimal coupled with sample recovery of >93%. The lower limit of quantification was 1 μg/mL, and 0.2 μg/mL was the lower limit of detection. Interference with other antibiotics was dependent on the combination of drugs present in patients' serum. A method comparison between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS suggested a negative bias for tandem mass spectrometry.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel method of teicoplanin determination by LC-MS/MS is proven to be a robust protocol that is consistent and reproducible. Clinicians searching for alternatives in therapeutic drug monitoring may have an additional option that is potentially more accurate and specific.