1
|
Weis S, Hagel S, Palm J, Scherag A, Kolanos S, Bahrs C, Löffler B, Schmitz RPH, Rißner F, Brunkhorst FM, Pletz MW. Effect of Automated Telephone Infectious Disease Consultations to Nonacademic Hospitals on 30-Day Mortality Among Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: The SUPPORT Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2218515. [PMID: 35749114 PMCID: PMC9233240 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a common and potentially severe infectious disease (ID). Retrospective studies and derived meta-analyses suggest that bedside infectious disease consultation (IDC) for SAB is associated with improved survival; however, such IDCs might not always be possible because of the lack of ID specialists, particularly at nonacademic hospitals. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether unsolicited telephone IDCs (triggered by an automated blood stream infection reporting system) to nonacademic hospitals improved 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with SAB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This patient-blinded, multicenter, interventional, cluster randomized, controlled, crossover clinical trial was conducted in 21 rural, nonacademic hospitals in Thuringia, Germany. From July 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018, 1029 blood culture reports were assessed for eligibility. A total of 386 patients were enrolled, whereas 643 patients were not enrolled for the following reasons: death before enrollment (n = 59); palliative care (n = 41); recurrence of SAB (n = 9); discharge from the hospital before enrollment (n = 77); age younger than 18 years (n = 5); duplicate report from a single patient (n = 26); late report (n = 17); blood culture reported during the washout phase (n = 48); and no signed informed consent for other or unknown reasons (n = 361). INTERVENTIONS During the ID intervention phase, ID specialists from Jena University Hospital provided unsolicited telephone IDCs to physicians treating patients with SAB. During the control phase, patients were treated according to local standards. Crossover was performed after including 15 patients or, at the latest, 1 year after the first patient was included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Thirty-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 386 patients (median [IQR] age, 75 [63-82] years; 261 [67.6%] male) were included, with 177 randomized to the IDC group and 209 to the control group. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate did not differ between the IDC and control groups (relative risk reduction [RRR], 0.12; 95% CI, -2.17 to 0.76; P = .81). No evidence was found of a difference in secondary outcomes, including 90-day mortality (RRR, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.59 to 0.57; P = .62), 90-day recurrence (RRR, 0.10; 95% CI, -2.51 to 0.89; P = .89), and hospital readmission (RRR, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.63 to 0.48; P = .90). Exploratory evidence suggested that indicators of quality of care were potentially realized more often in the IDC group than in the control group (relative quality improvement, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.26; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cluster randomized clinical trial, unsolicited telephone IDC, although potentially enhancing quality of care, did not improve 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with SAB. TRIAL REGISTRATION drks.de Identifier: DRKS00010135.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Weis
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Stefan Hagel
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Julia Palm
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer, and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - André Scherag
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer, and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Steffi Kolanos
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Christina Bahrs
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bettina Löffler
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Roland P. H. Schmitz
- Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Florian Rißner
- Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Frank M. Brunkhorst
- Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Mathias W. Pletz
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schöneweck F, Schmitz RPH, Rißner F, Scherag A, Löffler B, Pletz MW, Weis S, Brunkhorst FM, Hagel S. The epidemiology of bloodstream infections and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Thuringia, Germany: a five-year prospective, state-wide surveillance study (AlertsNet). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021; 10:132. [PMID: 34493334 PMCID: PMC8424790 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00997-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Monitoring pathogens of bloodstream infections (BSI) and their antibiotic susceptibility is important to guide empiric antibiotic treatment strategies and prevention programs. This study assessed the epidemiology of BSI and antibiotic resistance patterns at the German Federal State of Thuringia longitudinally. Methods A surveillance network consisting of 26 hospitals was established to monitor BSIs from 01/2015 to 12/2019. All blood culture results, without restriction of age of patients, of the participating hospitals were reported by the respective microbiological laboratory. A single detection of obligate pathogens and a repeated detection of coagulase-negative staphylococci, Bacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Micrococcus spp. and Propionibacterium spp., within 96 h were regarded as a relevant positive blood culture. If one of the aforementioned non-obligate pathogens has been detected only once within 96 h, contamination has been assumed. Logistic regression models were applied to analyse the relationship between resistance, year of BSI and hospital size. Generalized estimating equations were used to address potential clustering. Results A total of 343,284 blood cultures (BC) of 82,527 patients were recorded. Overall, 2.8% (n = 9571) of all BCs were classified as contaminated. At least one relevant pathogen was identified in 13.2% (n = 45,346) of BCs. Escherichia coli (25.4%) was the most commonly detected pathogen, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (15.2%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (8.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (4.6%). In S. aureus, we observed a decline of methicillin resistance (MRSA) from 10.4% in 2015 to 2.5% in 2019 (p < 0.001). The rate of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium (VRE) has increased from 16.7% in 2015 to 26.9% in 2019 (p < 0.001), with a peak in 2018 (42.5%). In addition, we observed an increase of Cefotaxime (3GC) resistance in E. coli from 10.7% in 2015 to 14.5% in 2019 (p = 0.007) whereas 3GC resistance in K. pneumoniae was stable (2015: 9.9%; 2019: 7.4%, p = 0.35). Carbapenem resistance was less than 1% for both pathogens. These patterns were robustly observed across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions We observed evidence for a decline in MRSA, an increase in VRE and a very low rate of carbapenem resistance in gram-negative bacteria. 3GC resistance in E. coli increased constantly over time. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00997-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Schöneweck
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.,Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, CSCC, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Roland P H Schmitz
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.,Center for Clinical Studies Jena (ZKS), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Florian Rißner
- Center for Clinical Studies Jena (ZKS), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - André Scherag
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.,Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, CSCC, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.,Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Bettina Löffler
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.,Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Mathias W Pletz
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Sebastian Weis
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.,Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Frank M Brunkhorst
- Center for Clinical Studies Jena (ZKS), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Stefan Hagel
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rothe K, Wantia N, Spinner CD, Schneider J, Lahmer T, Waschulzik B, Schmid RM, Busch DH, Katchanov J. Antimicrobial resistance of bacteraemia in the emergency department of a German university hospital (2013-2018): potential carbapenem-sparing empiric treatment options in light of the new EUCAST recommendations. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19:1091. [PMID: 31888581 PMCID: PMC6937826 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4721-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study investigated predominant microorganisms causing community-onset bacteraemia at the medical emergency department (ED) of a tertiary-care university hospital in Germany from 2013 to 2018 and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Methods Antimicrobial resistance patterns in patients with positive blood cultures presenting to an internal medicine ED were retrospectively analysed. Results Blood cultures were obtained at 5191 of 66,879 ED encounters, with 1013 (19.5%) positive results, and true positive results at 740 encounters (diagnostic yield, 14.3%). The most frequently isolated relevant microorganisms were Enterobacterales (n = 439, 59.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 92, 12.4%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 34, 4.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 32, 4.3%), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 16, 2.2%), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 18, 2.4%), and Enterococcus faecium (n = 12, 1.6%). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed a high proportion of resistance against ampicillin-sulbactam in Enterobacterales (42.2%). The rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was low (0.4%). Piperacillin-tazobactam therapy provided coverage for 83.2% of all relevant pathogens using conventional breakpoints. Application of the new European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations increased the percentage of susceptible isolates to high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam to 92.8% (p < 0.001). Broad-spectrum carbapenems would only cover an additional 4.8%. The addition of vancomycin or linezolid extended coverage by just 1.7%. Conclusions Using an ureidopenicillin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination at the high dose suggested by the new EUCAST recommendations provided nearly 93% coverage for relevant pathogens in patients with suspected bloodstream infection in our cohort. This might offer a safe option to reduce the empiric use of carbapenems. Our data support the absence of a general need for glycopeptides or oxazolidinones in empiric treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Rothe
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Nina Wantia
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph D Spinner
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Schneider
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Lahmer
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Birgit Waschulzik
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk H Busch
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juri Katchanov
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rothe K, Spinner CD, Ott A, Querbach C, Dommasch M, Aldrich C, Gebhardt F, Schneider J, Schmid RM, Busch DH, Katchanov J. Strategies for increasing diagnostic yield of community-onset bacteraemia within the emergency department: A retrospective study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222545. [PMID: 31513683 PMCID: PMC6742407 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high mortality. Therefore, reliable methods of detection are of paramount importance. Efficient strategies to improve diagnostic yield of bacteraemia within the emergency department (ED) are needed. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all ED encounters in a high-volume, city-centre university hospital within Germany during a five-year study period from October 2013 to September 2018. A time-series analysis was conducted for all ED encounters in which blood cultures (BCs) were collected. BC detection rates and diagnostic yield of community-onset bacteraemia were compared during the study period (which included 45 months prior to the start of a new diagnostic Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS) bundle and 15 months following its implementation). BCs were obtained from 5,191 out of 66,879 ED admissions (7.8%). Bacteraemia was detected in 1,013 encounters (19.5% of encounters where BCs were obtained). The overall yield of true bacteraemia (defined as yielding clinically relevant pathogens) was 14.4%. The new ABS-related diagnostic protocol resulted in an increased number of hospitalised patients with BCs collected in the ED (18% compared to 12.3%) and a significant increase in patients with two or more BC sets taken (59% compared to 25.4%), which resulted in an improved detection rate of true bacteraemia (2.5% versus 1.8% of hospital admissions) without any decrease in diagnostic yield. This simultaneous increase in BC rates without degradation of yield was a valuable finding that indicated success of this strategy. Thus, implementation of the new diagnostic ABS bundle within the ED, which included the presence of a skilled infectious disease (ID) team focused on obtaining BCs, appeared to be a valuable tool for the accurate and timely detection of community-onset bacteraemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Rothe
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Munich, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Christoph D. Spinner
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Department of Medicine II, Munich, Germany
| | - Armin Ott
- Technical University of Munich, Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Munich, Germany
| | - Christiane Querbach
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Pharmacy Department, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Dommasch
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Department of Medicine I, Munich, Germany
| | - Cassandra Aldrich
- Ludwigs-Maximilians-University Munich, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Friedemann Gebhardt
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Schneider
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Department of Medicine II, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland M. Schmid
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Department of Medicine II, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk H. Busch
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Munich, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juri Katchanov
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Department of Medicine II, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Culturing rate and the surveillance of bloodstream infections: a population-based assessment. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24:910.e1-910.e4. [PMID: 29309937 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2017] [Revised: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Diagnosis of a bloodstream infection (BSI) requires a positive blood culture. However, low culturing rates will underestimate the true incidence of BSI and high rates may increase the risk of false-positive results. We sought to investigate the relationship between culturing rates and the incidence of BSI at the population level. METHODS Population-based surveillance was conducted in the western interior of British Columbia, Canada, between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2017. RESULTS Among 60 243 blood culture sets drawn, 5591 isolates were obtained, of which 2303 were incident, 1929 were repeat positive and 1359 were contaminants. Overall annual rates of culturing, incident, repeat positive and contaminant isolates were 4832, 185, 155 and 109 per 100 000 population, respectively. During the 84-month study, there was an increase in the culturing rate that reached a plateau at 48 months (5403 cultures per 100 000 per year). The rate of both repeat isolates and contaminants increased linearly with an increasing culturing rate. However, the incident isolate rate reached an inflection point at a rate of approximately 5550 per 100 000 annually, at which point the increase in incident isolates per culture sample was diminished. At a culturing rate above 6123 per 100 000 per year, the number of repeat isolates exceeded that of incident isolates. CONCLUSIONS The determined incidence of BSI will increase with increased culturing in a population. Further studies are needed to explore optimal BSI culturing rates in other populations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Weis S, Hagel S, Schmitz RPH, Scherag A, Brunkhorst FM, Forstner C, Löffler B, Pletz MW. Study on the utility of a statewide counselling programme for improving mortality outcomes of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Thuringia (SUPPORT): a study protocol of a cluster-randomised crossover trial. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013976. [PMID: 28391236 PMCID: PMC5775453 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is a frequent infection with high mortality rates. It requires specific diagnostic and therapeutic management such as prolonged intravenous administration of antibiotics and aggressive search for and control of infectious sources. Underestimation of disease severity frequently results in delayed or inappropriate management of patients with SAB leading to increased mortality rates. According to observational studies, patient counselling by infectious disease consultants (IDC) improves survival and reduces the length of hospital stay as well as complication rates. In many countries, IDC are available only in some tertiary hospitals. In this trial, we aim to demonstrate that the outcome of patients with SAB in small and medium size hospitals that do not employ IDC can be improved by unsolicited ID phone counselling. The SUPPORT trial will be the first cluster-randomised controlled multicentre trial addressing this question. METHODS AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT is a single-blinded, multicentre interventional, cluster-randomised, controlled crossover trial with a minimum of 15 centres that will include 250 patients with SAB who will receive unsolicited IDC counselling and 250 who will receive standard of care. Reporting of SAB will be conducted by an electronic real-time blood culture registry established for the German Federal state of Thuringia (ALERTSNet) or directly by participating centres in order to minimise time delay before counselling. Mortality, disease course and complications will be monitored for 90 days with 30-day all-cause mortality rates as the primary outcome. Generalised linear mixed modelling will be used to detect the difference between the intervention sequences. We expect improved outcome of patients with SAB after IDC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION We obtained ethics approval from the Ethics committee of the Jena University Hospital and from the Ethics committee of the State Chamber of Physicians of Thuringia. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and additionally disseminated through public media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00010135.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Weis
- Center for Infectious Disease and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - S Hagel
- Center for Infectious Disease and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - R P H Schmitz
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - A Scherag
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - F M Brunkhorst
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - C Forstner
- Center for Infectious Disease and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Löffler
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - M W Pletz
- Center for Infectious Disease and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|