Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in various combinations for the treatment of experimental osteomyelitis due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Emerging Concepts for the Treatment of Biofilm-Associated Bone and Joint Infections with IV Fosfomycin: A Literature Review

Due to the involvement of biofilms in the pathogenesis of bone and joint infections (BJI), the treatment of these infections is often challenging, especially when multidrug- or extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) pathogens are involved. Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) is a phosphoenolpyruvate analogue with a unique mode of action and broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) pathogens. It is used in various severe and deep-seated infections, including BJIs. This review article focuses on preclinical and clinical data surrounding the use of FOS for biofilm-related BJIs. Data from several in vitro and animal models of infection demonstrated that FOS, especially in combination with other antibiotics, is effective against biofilms of (methicillin-resistant) Staphylococcus spp., (vancomycin-resistant) Enterococcus spp., carbapenem-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Data from clinical studies, mostly retrospective observational studies and case reports/case series, revealed that FOS was typically used in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of various BJI, including acute and chronic osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, and fracture-related infections, in adult and pediatric patients. Success rates often exceeded 80%. FOS exhibits good and fast penetration into bone tissue and is generally well tolerated, with only a few adverse drug reactions, such as gastrointestinal disorders and electrolyte imbalances. Collectively, the data indicate that FOS is a valuable option as part of combination regimens for the treatment of BJIs caused by both GP and GN bacteria.

A systematic review and individual bacterial species level meta-analysis of in vitro studies on the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam combined with other antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) develop resistance to many antimicrobials. To effectively manage infections caused by these organisms, novel agents and/or combinations of antimicrobials are required.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluated the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other antimicrobials against CR-GNB.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus were searched. Study outcomes were quantified by counting the number of isolates exhibiting synergy, defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration index ≤ 0.5 for checkerboard and Etest, and a >2 log cfu/mL reduction for time-kill studies. The proportion of synergy was calculated as the ratio of isolates exhibiting synergy to the total number of isolates tested. These proportions were analysed using a random-effects model, following the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation.

RESULTS

Forty-five in vitro studies were included. A total of 734 isolates were tested, and 69.3% of them were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam. The combination of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam showed a high synergy rate against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (effect size, ES = 0.91-0.98) and Escherichia coli (ES = 0.75-1.00). Ceftazidime/avibactam also demonstrated a high synergy rate (ES = 1) in time-kill studies when combined with azithromycin, fosfomycin and gentamicin against K. pneumoniae. Compared to ceftazidime/avibactam alone, a higher bactericidal rate was reported when ceftazidime/avibactam was combined with other antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (57% versus 31%) and E. coli (93% versus 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftazidime/avibactam frequently demonstrates synergistic bactericidal activity when combined with various antimicrobials against CR-GNB in in vitro tests. Further pre-clinical and clinical studies are warranted to validate the utility of ceftazidime/avibactam-based combination regimens for CR-GNB infections.

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Multidrug Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens in Bone and Joint Infections

Multidrug (MDR) and extensive drug (XDR) resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) emerges worldwide. Although bone and joint infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria, mainly Staphylococci, MDR GNB substantially increase also as a complication of hospitalization and previous antibiotic administration. This narrative review analyzes the epidemiological trend, current experimental data, and clinical experience with available therapeutic options for the difficult to treat (DTR) GNB implicated in bone and joint infections with or without orthopedic implants. The radical debridement and removal of the implant is adequate therapy for most cases, along with prompt and prolonged combined antimicrobial treatment by older and novel antibiotics. Current research and clinical data suggest that fluoroquinolones well penetrate bone tissue and are associated with improved outcomes in DTR GNB; if not available, carbapenems can be used in cases of MDR GNB. For XDR GNB, colistin, fosfomycin, tigecycline, and novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors can be initiated as combination schemas in intravenous administration, along with local elution from impregnated spacers. However, current data are scarce and large multicenter studies are mandatory in the field.

Medical Treatment of Osteomyelitis due to Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Diabetes-Related Foot Disease

N/A

Impact of porin deficiency on the synergistic potential of colistin in combination with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors against ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Combinations of colistin and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) have shown in vitro synergy against β-lactamase-producing strains. However, data are limited and conflicting, potentially attributed to variations among the examined strains. This study investigated whether loss of porins OmpK35 and OmpK36 impacts the synergistic potential of colistin in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Genetically modified strains were constructed by introducing blaCTX-M-15, blaKPC-2, and blaOXA-48 chromosomally into K. pneumoniae ATCC 35657, in which the major porin-encoding genes (ompK35, ompK36) were either intact or knocked out. The in vitro activity of colistin in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-avibactam was evaluated by time-lapse microscopy screening and in static time-kill experiments. The deletion of porins in the β-lactamase-producing strains resulted in 2- to 128-fold increases in MICs for the β-lactams and BLBLIs. The activity of avibactam was concentration-dependent, and 4- to 16-fold higher concentrations were required to achieve similar inhibition of the β-lactamases in strains with porin loss. In the screening, synergy was observed for colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam against the CTX-M-15-producing strains and colistin and meropenem-avibactam against the KPC-2- and OXA-48-producing strains. The combination effects were less pronounced in the time-kill experiments, where synergy was rarely detected. No apparent associations were found between the loss of OmpK35 and OmpK36 and combination effects with colistin and BLBLIs, indicating that additional factors determine the synergistic potential of such combinations.

First case report of a vertebral osteomyelitis caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae treated with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam prolonged infusion then meropenem/vaborbactam in continuous infusion

Introduction

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria are becoming more frequent. However, data on the use of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, such as imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (I-R) and meropenem/vaborbactam (MVB), to treat BJIs is lacking. Furthermore, prolonged infusions of these β-lactams should theoretically optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics target in these indications, but there are currently no reports on this type of infusions, especially in the setting of BJI.

Case Presentation

We report a case of a vertebral osteomyelitis caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae successfully treated with extended-infusion of I-R (1.25 g q6h over 2 h), then with continuous infusion of MVB (2 g q4h as over 4 h). Therapeutic drug monitoring confirmed that extended-infusion of I-R and continuous infusion of MVB achieved serum concentrations up to 12 mg/L of imipenem and 19 mg/L of meropenem, respectively.

Conclusion

The favourable outcome of this patient treated for a vertebral osteomyelitis caused by carbapenem-resistant E. cloacae suggest that extended- and continuous infusions of I-R and MVB, are promising regimens for treatment of BJIs caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

Challenges and opportunities of phage therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae infections

Traditional antibiotics have been effective in many cases. However, the rise in multidrug-resistant bacteria has diminished their therapeutic efficacy, signaling the dawn of an era beyond antibiotics. The challenge of multidrug resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae is particularly critical, with increasing global mortality and resistance rates. Therefore, the development of alternative therapies to antibiotics is urgently needed. Phages, which are natural predators of bacteria, have inherent advantages. However, comprehensive information on K. pneumoniae phages is lacking in current literature. This review aims to analyze and summarize relevant studies, focusing on the present state of phage therapy for K. pneumoniae infections. This includes an examination of treatment methodologies, associated challenges, strategies, new phage technologies, clinical trial safety and efficacy, regulatory issues, and future directions for phage therapy development. Enhancing phage technology is crucial for addressing the evolving threat of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for adult patients with serious Gram-negative infections: a review of the literature

Treatment of patients with serious infections due to resistant Gram-negative bacteria remains highly problematic and has prompted clinicians to use existing antimicrobial agents in innovative ways. One approach gaining increased therapeutic use is combination therapy with IV fosfomycin. This article reviews the preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) infection model and clinical data surrounding the use of combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for the treatment of serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Data from dynamic in vitro and animal infection model studies of highly resistant Enterobacterales and non-lactose fermenters are positive and suggest IV fosfomycin in combination with a β-lactam, polymyxin or aminoglycoside produces a synergistic effect that rivals or surpasses that of other aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-containing regimens. Clinical studies performed to date primarily have involved patients with pneumonia and/or bacteraemia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii. Overall, the observed success rates with fosfomycin combination regimens were consistent with those reported for other combination regimens commonly used to treat these patients. In studies in which direct treatment comparisons can be derived, the results suggest that patients who received fosfomycin combination therapy had similar or improved outcomes compared with other therapies and combinations, especially when it was used in combination with a β-lactam that (1) targets PBP-3 and (2) has exceptional stability in the presence of β-lactamases. Collectively, the data indicate that combination therapy with IV fosfomycin should be considered as a potential alternative to aminoglycoside or polymyxin combinations for patients with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections when benefits outweigh risks.

Is there evidence on the optimal duration of aminoglycoside therapy in β-lactam/aminoglycoside combination regimens used for the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in combination regimens is expected to be different from that of monotherapy regimens, and shorter durations could help minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy. The aim of this review was to assess the evidence for the optimal duration of aminoglycosides in β-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations used for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINHAL databases were searched. Covidence software was used for article screening and management. Studies were included if they clearly reported the duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in β-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations used against Gram-negative bacteria. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023392709).

RESULTS

A total of 45 β-lactam/aminoglycoside combination courses from 32 articles were evaluated. The duration of therapy of aminoglycosides in combinations regimens ranged from 1 to 14 days, varying with the type of infection treated. In half (51.1%; (23/45) of the combinations, aminoglycosides were administered for a duration ranging from 6 to 9 days. In 26.7% (12/45) of the combinations, the duration of aminoglycoside therapy was ≤ 5 days. In the remaining 22.2% (10/45) of these combinations, the aminoglycosides were administered for a duration of ≥ 10 days. Aminoglycosides were administered for a longer duration of 7-14 days in 12 (75%) of the 16 combination courses that induced toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Long duration of aminoglycoside use is associated with increased risk of toxicity. However, there is a lack of evidence on defining an optimal duration of aminoglycoside therapy in β-lactam/aminoglycoside combination regimens that ensures clinical efficacy outcomes whilst minimizing toxicity outcomes.

Effect of ceftazidime-avibactam combined with different antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

This study aimed to assess the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in combination with various antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). We selected 59 clinical CRKP isolates containing distinct drug resistance mechanisms. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), eravacycline (ERA), amikacin (AK), fosfomycin (FOS), and aztreonam (ATM), both individually and in combination with CZA, were tested using the checkerboard method. The interactions of antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed by fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). The time-kill curve assay was employed to dynamically evaluate the effects of these drugs alone and in combination format. In the checkerboard assay, the combination of CZA+MEM showed the highest level of synergistic effect against both KPC-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, with synergy rates of 91.3% and 100%, respectively. Following closely was the combination of FOS+CZA . For metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) producing strains, ATM+CZA displayed complete synergy, while the combination of MEM+CZA showed a synergy rate of only 57.14% for NDM-producing strains and 91.67% for IMP-producing strains. In the time-kill assay, MEM+CZA also demonstrated significant synergistic effects against the two KPC-2-producing isolates (Y070 and L70), the two carbapenemase-non-producing isolates (Y083 and L093), and the NDM-1-producing strain L13, with reductions in log10 CFU/mL exceeding 10 compared to the control. Against the IMP-producing strain Y047, ATM+CZA exhibited the highest synergistic effect, resulting in a log10 CFU/mL reduction of 10.43 compared to the control. The combination of CZA and MEM exhibited good synergistic effects against KPC-producing and non-enzyme-producing strains, followed by the FOS+CZA combination. Among MBL-producing strains, ATM+CZA demonstrated the most pronounced synergistic effect. However, the combinations of CZA with ERA, AK, and COL show irrelevant effects against the tested clinical isolates.

IMPORTANCE

Our study confirmed the efficacy of the combination CZA+MEM against KPC-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing strains. For metalloenzyme-producing strains, CZA+ATM demonstrated the most significant synergy. Additionally, CZA exhibited a notable synergy effect when combined with FOS. These combination therapies present promising new options for the treatment of CRKP infection.

Antibiotic heteroresistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae: Definition, detection methods, mechanisms, and combination therapy

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a common opportunistic pathogen that presents significant challenges in the treatment of infections due to its resistance to multiple antibiotics. In recent years, K. pneumoniae has been reported for the development of heteroresistance, a phenomenon where subpopulations of the susceptible bacteria exhibit resistance. This heteroresistance has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. Complicating matters further, its definition and detection pose challenges, often leading to its oversight or misdiagnosis. Various mechanisms contribute to the development of heteroresistance in K. pneumoniae, and these mechanisms differ among different antibiotics. Even for the same antibiotic, multiple mechanisms may be involved. However, our current understanding of these mechanisms remains incomplete, and further research is needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of heteroresistance. While the clinical recommendation is to use combination antibiotic therapy to mitigate heteroresistance, this approach also comes with several drawbacks and potential adverse effects. In this review, we discuss the definition, detection methods, molecular mechanisms, and treatment of heterogenic resistance, aiming to pave the way for more effective treatment and management in the future. However, addressing the problem of heteroresistance in K. pneumoniae represents a long and complex journey that necessitates comprehensive research efforts.

Effect of achieving bone sterilisation on bone architecture and bone marrow, in an experimental rabbit model of osteomyelitis caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

OBJECTIVES

Natural history and treatment of bone infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are poorly defined. We evaluated the effect of treatment on the progression of subacute osteomyelitis in a rabbit model.

METHODS

Two isolates were used: a KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and an Escherichia coli harbouring blaOXA-48 and blaCTX-M15 inserts, both susceptible to gentamicin, colistin, fosfomycin, and ceftazidime-avibactam. Osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of 2 × 108 colony-forming units/mL. Antibiotics were started 14 d later, for 7 d, in 6 groups of 12 rabbits. Three days after treatment completion (D24), rabbits were euthanised and bones were cultured. Bone marrow and bone architecture macroscopic changes were evaluated through analysis of pictures by investigators unaware of the rabbit treatment group and microbiological outcome, using scales ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe lesions) depending on modifications.

RESULTS

Bone marrow modifications induced by local infection were similar between prematurely deceased animals and non-sterilised animals (P = 0.14) but differed significantly from animals that achieved bone sterilisation after treatment (P = 0.04). Conversely, when comparing bone deformity, rabbits who died early (n = 13) had similar bone architecture as those achieving bone sterilisation (P = 0.12), as opposed to those not sterilised after treatment (P = 0.04). After a multivariate logistic regression, bone marrow scale ≤2 was associated with bone sterilisation (P < 0.001), and bone architecture scale ≤2 was associated with bone sterilisation (adjusted odds ratio = 2.7; 95% confidence interval 1.14-6.37) and KPC infection (adjusted odds ratio = 5.1; 95% confidence interval 2.17-12.13).

CONCLUSION

Effective antibacterial treatment reduces bone architecture distortion and bone marrow changes. These variables may be used as proxy for bone sterilisation.

Mutations in ompK36 differentially impact in vitro synergy of meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other antibiotics against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objectives

Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are preferred agents for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections and are often used in combination with other agents. We aimed to characterize the synergy of combinations against KPC-Kp with varying ompK36 genotypes.

Methods

KPC-Kp that harboured ompK36 WT, IS5 or glycine-aspartic acid duplication (GD) genotypes were selected. MICs were determined in triplicate. Synergy was assessed by time-kill assays for ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in combination with colistin, gentamicin, tigecycline, meropenem or fosfomycin against 1 × 108 cfu/mL KPC-Kp.

Results

KPC-Kp harboured ompK36 WT (n = 5), IS5 (n = 5) or GD (n = 5); 11 were KPC-2 and 4 were KPC-3. All were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. In time-kill analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam 1 × MIC exhibited mean 24 h log-kills of -2.01 and -0.84, respectively. Ceftazidime/avibactam was synergistic in combination with colistin independent of ompK36 genotype. Ceftazidime/avibactam combinations impacted by porin mutations (compared to WT) were meropenem (-5.18 versus -6.62 mean log-kill, P < 0.001) and fosfomycin (-3.98 versus -6.58, P = 0.058). Mean log-kills with meropenem/vaborbactam were greatest in combination with gentamicin (-5.36). In the presence of porin mutations, meropenem/vaborbactam killing activity was potentiated by the addition of colistin (-6.65 versus -0.70, P = 0.03) and fosfomycin (-3.12 versus 1.54, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

Our results shed new light on the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam combinations against KPC-Kp with or without porin mutations. Killing activity of ceftazidime/avibactam with other cell wall active agents was decreased against isolates with porin mutations. On the other hand, some meropenem/vaborbactam combinations demonstrated enhanced killing in the presence of porin mutations.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam as Osteomyelitis Therapy: A Miniseries and Review of the Literature

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria are becoming a concern due to limited therapeutic options. Although not approved for these indications, an ever-growing amount of evidence supports the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam as a therapy for osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections. Here, we present three cases of difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa osteomyelitis that were successfully treated with ceftazidime-avibactam alone or in combination therapy with fosfomycin and amikacin. Ceftazidime-avibactam was prescribed at a daily dose of 2.5 g every 8 h for 42 days in all cases. One potential drug-related adverse effect was observed, i.e., Clostridioides difficile infection, which occurred after fourteen days of treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam.

Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Spondylodiscitis Treated with Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Case Report with Literature Review

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) is a highly morbid and potentially fatal bacterial infection with an increasing incidence in recent decades. Its diagnosis and treatment are challenging, especially with the expansion of multidrug- or extensively drug-resistant bacteria. We report a rare case of PS caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) that was treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A). The choice of C/A therapy was based on the patient's bacterial sensitivity profile and intolerance to the initial therapeutic regimen (polymyxin B and meropenem). The total antimicrobial treatment time was seven weeks. The evolution of the clinical course met the cure criteria, which was characterized by remission of signs and symptoms, normalization of inflammatory markers, and radiological improvement over 18 months of clinical follow-up. This is a rare case of CRPA spondylodiscitis that responded to C/A treatment.