Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the hollow fiber model and clinical validation of efficacy to treat pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus Disease

Omadacycline drug susceptibility testing for non-tuberculous mycobacteria using oxyrase to overcome challenges with drug degradation

BACKGROUND

Drug susceptibility testing (DST) protocol of omadacycline against non-tuberculous mycobacteria has not yet been established. We developed a method to accurately determine MIC omadacycline MIC against Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab), Mycobacterium avium-complex (MAC), and Mycobacterium kansasii (Mkn).

METHODS

First, we identified the oxyrase concentration not affecting Mab, MAC, and Mkn growth followed by omadacycline MIC experiments with and without oxyrase using reference and clinical strains.

RESULTS

Oxyrase 0.5 % (v/v) stabilized omadacycline in the culture medium. The median omadacycline MIC was 1 mg/L for Mab and 8 mg/L for Mkn. For MAC, the median omadacycline MIC was 2 mg/L for M. avium, 256 mg/L for M. intracellulare, and 4 mg/L for M. chimaera (p < 0.0001). Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test revealed statistically lower MICs with oxyrase for all MAC subspecies (p < 0.0001), all Mab subspecies (p < 0.0001), and Mkn (p = 0.0002). The decrease in MICs with oxyrase was 17/18 of Mab, 14/19 of Mkn, 8/8 of M. avium, 4/5 M. chimera, but only 11/18 of M. intracellulare (p < 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Use of 0.5 % oxyrase could be a potential solution to reliable and reproducible omadacycline MIC of Mab. However, oxyrase demonstrated a variable effect in reducing MICs against MAC and Mkn.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium abscessus and treatment of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary infections

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) is the mycobacterial species least susceptible to antimicrobials. Infections are difficult to treat, and cure rates are below 50% even after a combination of 4-5 drugs for many months.

OBJECTIVES

To examine antimicrobial susceptibilities and treatment recommendations in light of what is known about mechanisms of resistance and pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics (PK/PD) interactions.

SOURCES

Original papers on the topics of 'antimicrobials', 'susceptibility', 'treatment', and 'outcome' from 2019 onwards, in the context of the evidence brought by the guidelines published in 2020 for pulmonary infections.

CONTENT

MAB is susceptible in vitro to only a few antimicrobials. Breakpoints were set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and are revised by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for epidemiological cut-off values. Innate resistance is due to multiple resistance mechanisms involving efflux pumps, inactivating enzymes, and low drug-target affinity. In addition, MAB may display acquired resistance to macrolides and amikacin through mutations in drug binding sites. Treatment outcomes are better for macrolide-based combinations and MAB subspecies massiliense. New compounds in the family of cyclines, oxazolidinones, and penem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (described in another paper), as well as bedaquiline, a new antituberculous agent, are promising, but their efficacy remains to be proven. PK/PD studies, which are critical for establishing optimal dosing regimens, were mainly done for monotherapy and healthy individuals.

IMPLICATIONS

Medical evidence is poor, and randomized clinical trials or standardized cohorts are needed to compare outcomes of patients with similar underlying disease, clinical characteristics, and identified MAB subspecies/sequevar. Microbiological diagnosis and susceptibility testing need to be harmonized to enable the comparison of agents and the testing of new compounds. Testing antimicrobial combinations requires new methods, especially for PK/PD parameters. Molecular testing may help in assessing MAB resistance prior to treatment. New antimicrobials need to be systematically tested against MAB to find an effective antimicrobial regimen.

In vitro activity of omadacycline against clinical isolates of Nocardia

Nocardiosis typically requires a prolonged treatment duration of ≥6 months and initial combination therapy with 2-3 antibiotics. First-line regimens for nocardiosis are associated with considerable toxicity; therefore, alternative therapies are needed. Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline with broad antimicrobial activity whose in vitro activity against Nocardia species has not been formally assessed. The in vitro potency of omadacycline was evaluated against 300 Nocardia clinical isolates by broth microdilution. The most common Nocardia species tested were N. cyriacigeorgica (21%), N. nova (20%), and N. farcinica (12%). The most common specimens were respiratory (178 isolates, 59%) and wound (57 isolates, 19%). Omadacycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) across all Nocardia species ranged from 0.06 µg/mL to 8 µg/mL, with an MIC50 of 2 µg/mL and MIC90 of 4 µg/mL. The lowest MICs were found among N. paucivorans (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 0.25 µg/mL), N. asiatica (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. abscessus complex (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. beijingensis (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL), and N. otitidiscaviarum (MIC50 = 1 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL). The highest MICs were found among N. farcinica (MIC50 = 4 µg/mL, MIC90 = 8 µg/mL). In vitro potency differed by species among Nocardia clinical isolates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the potential clinical utility of omadacycline for nocardiosis.

Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the hollow fiber system model

Seventy-five years ago, first-generation tetracyclines demonstrated limited efficacy in the treatment of tuberculosis but were more toxic than efficacious. We performed a series of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) experiments with a potentially safer third-generation tetracycline, omadacycline, for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv and an MDR-TB clinical strain (16D) were used in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and static concentration-response studies in test tubes, followed by a PK/PD study using the hollow fiber system model of TB (HFS-TB) that examined six human-like omadacycline doses. The inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model and Monte Carlo experiments (MCEs) were used for data analysis and clinical dose-finding, respectively. The omadacycline MIC for both Mtb H37Rv and MDR-TB clinical strain was 16 mg/L but dropped to 4 mg/L with daily drug supplementation to account for omadacycline degradation. The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube MIC was 2 mg/L. In the test tubes, omadacycline killed 4.39 log10 CFU/mL in 7 days. On Day 28 of the HFS-TB study, the Emax was 4.64 log10 CFU/mL, while exposure mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was an area under the concentration-time curve to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC) ratio of 22.86. This translates to PK/PD optimal exposure or EC80 as AUC0-24/MIC of 26.93. The target attainment probability of the 300-mg daily oral dose was 90% but fell at MIC ≧4 mg/L. Omadacycline demonstrated efficacy and potency against both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB. Further studies are needed to identify the omadacycline effect in combination therapy for the treatment of both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB.

Exploring antibiotic resistance mechanisms in Mycobacterium abscessus for enhanced therapeutic approaches

Mycobacterium abscessus, a leading cause of severe lung infections in immunocompromised individuals, poses significant challenges for current therapeutic strategies due to resistance mechanisms. Therefore, understanding the intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance of M. abscessus is crucial for effective treatment. This review highlights the mechanisms employed by M. abscessus to sustain antibiotic resistance, encompassing not only conventional drugs but also newly discovered drug candidates. This comprehensive analysis aims to identify novel entities capable of overcoming the notorious resistance exhibited by M. abscessus, providing insights for the development of more effective therapeutic interventions.

Sarecycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the hollow-fibre model of Mycobacterium avium complex: so near and yet so far

BACKGROUND

Poor sustained sputum culture conversion rates with the standard-of-care therapy highlight the need for better drugs to treat Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)-optimized exposure of sarecycline and its potential role in treating MAC-PD.

METHODS

We performed MIC studies with MAC ATCC 700898 and 19 clinical isolates and test-tube static concentration-response studies. A dynamic hollow-fibre system model of intracellular MAC (HFS-MAC) study was performed mimicking six human-equivalent sarecycline dose concentration-time profiles to identify the PK/PD optimal exposure of sarecycline for MAC kill. The inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model was used for PK/PD analysis.

RESULTS

The sarecycline MIC of MAC ATCC 700898 was 1 mg/L, while the MIC for the 19 clinical strains ranged between 32 and >256 mg/L. The concentration mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was similar between intracellular and extracellular MAC. In the HFS-MAC, all six sarecycline doses killed intracellular MAC, with an Emax of 1.0 log10 cfu/mL below Day 0 burden (stasis). The sarecycline EC80 (optimal) exposure was identified as AUC0-24/MIC = 139.46.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarecycline demonstrated anti-MAC Emax in the HFS-MAC model better than ethambutol but worse than omadacycline (>5 log10 cfu/mL below stasis) in HFS-MAC. However, since currently approved highest oral sarecycline dose achieves an AUC0-24 of 48.2 mg·h/L and MAC MICs are >32 mg/L, the target AUC0-24/MIC of 139.46 is unlikely to be achieved in patients.

Treatment of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria skin infections

Non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM) skin infections have become increasingly prevalent in recent years, presenting a unique challenge in clinical management. This review explored the complexities of NTM infections localized to the superficial tissues and provided valuable insights into the optimal therapeutic strategies. The antibiotic selection should base on NTM species and their susceptibility profiles. It is recommended to adopt a comprehensive approach that considers the unique characteristics of superficial tissues to improve treatment effectiveness and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, infection recurrence, and treatment failure. Infection control measures, patient education, and close monitoring should complement the treatment strategies to achieve favorable outcomes in managing NTM skin infections. Further efforts are warranted to elucidate factors and mechanisms contributing to treatment resistance and relapse. Future research should focus on exploring novel treatment options, innovative drug development/delivery platforms, and precise methodologies for determining therapeutic duration. Longitudinal studies are also needed to assess the long-term safety profiles of the integrated approaches.