Characterisation of a Novel Tigecycline Resistance Gene tet(X22) and its Coexistence with blaNDM-1 in a Pseudomonas caeni Isolate

Concurrence of Inactivation Enzyme-Encoding Genes tet(X), blaEBR, and estT in Empedobacter Species from Chickens and Surrounding Environments

The emergence of inactivation enzyme-encoding genes tet(X), blaEBR, and estT challenges the effectiveness of tetracyclines, β-lactams, and macrolides. This study aims to explore the concurrence and polymorphism of their variants in Empedobacter sp. strains from food-producing animals and surrounding environments. A total of eight tet(X) variants, seven blaEBR variants, and seven estT variants were detected in tet(X)-positive Empedobacter sp. strains (6.7%) from chickens, sewage, and soil, including 31 Empedobacter stercoris and 6 novel species of Taxon 1. All of them were resistant to tigecycline, tetracycline, colistin, and ciprofloxacin, and 16.2% were resistant to meropenem, florfenicol, and cefotaxime. The MIC90 of tylosin, tilmicosin, and tildipirosin was 128 mg/L, 16 mg/L, and 8 mg/L, respectively. Cloning expression confirmed that tet(X6) and the novel variants tet(X23), tet(X24), tet(X25), tet(X26), and tet(X26.2) conferred high-level tigecycline resistance, while all of the others exhibited relatively low-level activities or were inactivated. The bacterial relationship was diverse, but the genetic environments of tet(X) and blaEBR were more conserved than estT. An ISCR2-mediated tet(X6) transposition structure, homologous to those of Acinetobacter sp., Proteus sp., and Providencia sp., was also identified in Taxon 1. Therefore, the tet(X)-positive Empedobacter sp. strains may be ignored and pose a serious threat to food safety and public health.

Emergence of plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance tet(X4) gene in Enterobacterales isolated from wild animals in captivity

Background

Over the past few decades, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a global health challenge in human and veterinary medicine. Research on AMR genes in captive wild animals has increased. However, the presence and molecular characteristics of tet(X)-carrying bacteria in these animals remain unknown.

Methods

Eighty-four samples were collected from captive wild animals. tet(X) variants were detected using polymerase chain reaction and the isolates were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. All isolated strains were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing. The virulence of an Escherichia coli strain carrying enterotoxin genes was assessed using a Galleria mellonella larval model.

Results

We isolated two tet(X4)-positive E. coli strains and one tet(X4)-positive Raoultella ornithinolytica strain. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests revealed that all three tet(X4)-carrying bacteria were sensitive to the 13 tested antimicrobial agents, but exhibited resistance to tigecycline. Notably, one tet(X4)-carrying E. coli strain producing an enterotoxin had a toxic effect on G. mellonella larvae. Whole-genome sequencing analysis showed that the two tet(X4)-carrying E. coli strains had more than 95% similarity to tet(X4)-containing E. coli strains isolated from pigs and humans in China.

Conclusion

The genetic environment of tet(X4) closely resembled that of the plasmid described in previous studies. Our study identified tet(X4)-positive strains in wildlife and provided valuable epidemiological data for monitoring drug resistance. The identification of enterotoxin-producing E. coli strains also highlights the potential risks posed by virulence genes.

Convergence of plasmid-mediated Colistin and Tigecycline resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objective

The co-occurrence of colistin and tigecycline resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae poses a serious public health problem. This study aimed to characterize a K. pneumoniae strain, K82, co-harboring a colistin resistance gene (CoRG) and tigecycline resistance gene (TRG), and, importantly, investigate the genetic characteristics of the plasmid with CoRG or TRG in GenBank.

Methods

K. pneumoniae strain K82 was subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, conjugation assay, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). In addition, comparative genomic analysis of CoRG or TRG-harboring plasmids from K82 and GenBank was conducted. K. pneumoniae strain K82 was resistant to all the tested antimicrobials including colistin and tigecycline, except for carbapenems.

Results

WGS and bioinformatic analysis showed that K82 belonged to the ST656 sequence type and carried multiple drug resistance genes, including mcr-1 and tmexCD1-toprJ1, which located on IncFIA/IncHI2/IncHI2A/IncN/IncR-type plasmid pK82-mcr-1 and IncFIB/IncFII-type plasmid pK82-tmexCD-toprJ, respectively. The pK82-mcr-1 plasmid was capable of conjugation. Analysis of the CoRG/TRG-harboring plasmid showed that mcr-8 and tmexCD1-toprJ1 were the most common CoRG and TRG of Klebsiella spp., respectively. These TRG/CoRG-harboring plasmids could be divided into two categories based on mash distance. Moreover, we found an IncFIB/IncHI1B-type plasmid, pSYCC1_tmex_287k, co-harboring mcr-1 and tmexCD1-toprJ1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the co-occurrence of mcr-1 and tmexCD1-toprJ1 on a single plasmid.

Conclusion

Our research expands the known diversity of CoRG and TRG-harboring plasmids in K. pneumoniae. Effective surveillance should be implemented to assess the prevalence of co-harboring CoRG and TRG in a single K. pneumoniae isolate or even a single plasmid.