Distinct renin/aldosterone activity profiles correlate with renal function, natriuretic response, decongestive ability and prognosis in acute heart failure

The role of urine chloride in acute heart failure

In our retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between urinary chloride (uCl-) and selected clinical and laboratory biomarkers, renal function, and patient outcomes in the acute heart failure (AHF) population. We divided 248 adult patients (≥ 18 years) with AHF into two groups: low uCl- (< 115 mmol/L) and high uCl-. The mean age of the patient group was 70.2 ± 12.6, and 182 patients were male (73.4%). Clinical endpoints included in-hospital mortality, one-year mortality, and a composite endpoint of one-year mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure. Patients were followed up for at least one year. Relevant clinical and baseline biomarker data were collected, including markers concerning inflammation, liver and kidney function, perfusion and congestion, iron status, cardiac remodeling, gasometry, renin and aldosterone. Low uCl- was associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality (7.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.014), the need for inotropic support (20.19% vs. 2.08%, p ≤ 0.001), worsening of HF during therapy (17.31% vs. 4.86%, p ≤ 0.001), and the need for treatment in an intensive cardiac care unit (33.65% vs. 15.28%, p ≤ 0.001). Low uCl- was a significant predictor of one-year mortality (40.4% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.05) and the composite outcome (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.43-4.08, p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, uCl- was independently associated with the risk of one-year mortality (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p < 0.05) and the composite outcome (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that low uCl- is a marker of more advanced heart failure, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and is related to worse one-year outcomes.

Spot urine sodium-to-creatinine ratio surpasses sodium in identifying poor diuretic response in acute heart failure

AIMS

We aim to identify the most accurate marker for early prediction of poor diuretic response in acute heart failure (AHF) patients with signs of congestion requiring intravenous diuretic treatment.

METHODS

In this single-centre, prospective observational study, AHF patients with signs of congestion received a standardized intravenous furosemide dose (1 mg/kg of body weight; 40 mg in bolus and remaining dose in 2 h continuous infusion). Subsequently, we assessed spot urine composition at 2 h post-administration, comparing it with total urine output at 6 h. Various potential urine markers were analysed for predicting urine output using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression models. We investigated guideline-recommended markers, including spot urine sodium (UNa+) and its cut-off, and introduced the UNa+/UCr (urine creatinine concentration) ratio adjusting UNa+ for urine dilution.

RESULTS

Out of 111 patients (85% males, 66.4 ± 13.9 years old, NTproBNP 7290 [4493-14 582] pg/ml), there were 18 (16%) with a poor diuretic response (cumulative urine output <600 ml during the first 6 h). The mean 6 h cumulative diuresis in patients with poor and good diuretic response was 406 ± 142 and 2114 ± 1164 ml, respectively, P < 0.005. After an initial evaluation of several potential biomarkers, only UNa+, UCr and UNa+/UCr were selected as candidates with the highest predictive value. The cut-off for UNa+ adjusted for urine dilution: UNa+/UCr ratio <0.167 mmol/mg × 10-1 was determined by ROC analysis with the highest area under the curve (95% confidence interval): 0.956 (0.915-0.997), P < 0.001. When compared with the guideline-recommended cut-off (UNa+ <50 mmol/L as a reference, specificity-0.97; sensitivity-0.83), the odds ratio (OR) for UNa+/UCreat to identify a poor diuretic response was 2.5 times greater, regardless of kidney function (OR for estimated glomerular filtration rate in the logistic regression model was 0.978 [0.945-1.013, P = 0.222]).

CONCLUSIONS

The UNa+/UCr ratio in a spot urine sample 2 h after intravenous diuretic administration is a simple, highly predictive marker for the identification of AHF patients with poor diuretic response, surpassing guidelines-recommended markers like UNa+.

Renin Trajectories and Outcome in Stable Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) on Contemporary Therapy: A Monocentric Study from an Austrian Tertiary Hospital Outpatient Clinic

Introduction

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is the main target of neurohumoral therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) effectively reducing mortality. Reasonably, renin might serve as a biomarker for risk prediction and therapy response. Renin indeed bears some additional value to clinical risk models, albeit the effect is not pronounced. Whether assessing renin trajectories can overcome the weaknesses of single renin measurements has not been reported.

Methods

A total of 505 patients with stable HFrEF were enrolled prospectively and followed through routine clinical visits. Active plasma renin concentration was documented up to 5 years. Changes in renin were analyzed throughout the disease course, and survival was compared for different renin trajectories within the first year.

Results

Baseline renin levels were not related to all-cause mortality (crude HR for an increase of 100 μiE/ml: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99-1.02), p = 0.414) but associated with unplanned HF hospitalizations (crude HR: 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00-1.02), p = 0.015). Renin increased during the disease course from baseline to 1-year and 2-year FUP (122.7 vs. 185.6 μIU/ml, p = 0.039, and 122.7 vs. 258.5 μIU/ml, p = 0.001). Both survival and unplanned HF hospitalization rates were comparable for different renin trajectories at 1-year FUP (p = 0.546, p = 0.357).

Conclusions

Intriguingly, renin is not a good biomarker to indicate prognosis in HF, while renin trajectories over a 1-year period do not have an additional value. Rapid physiologic plasma renin variations, but also opposing effects of angiotensinogen-derived metabolites under presence of RAS blockade, might obscure the predictive ability of renin.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure: Potential decongestive mechanisms and current clinical studies

Congestion is a key pathophysiological feature of heart failure (HF) syndrome that drives most of the clinical manifestations of acute HF and is related with poor quality of life and outcomes. Therefore, safe and effective decongestion is an important therapeutic target in the management of acute HF and despite the use of guideline-recommended loop diuretics, adequate decongestion is not always achieved in patients with acute HF. Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been shown to provide clinical benefits across a broad spectrum of patients with HF, including consistent reduction in the risk of acute HF episodes. While the exact mechanisms underlying these benefits remain a matter of debate, a growing body of evidence suggests that effective decongestion may be partly responsible, especially in the setting of acute HF. In this review, we discuss the potential decongestive mechanisms of SGLT-2 inhibitors, such as osmotic diuresis, natriuresis, preservation of glomerular filtration and facilitation of interstitial drainage, which can collectively translate into effective and safe decongestion. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive review of up-to-date clinical data of SGLT-2 inhibitor use in the acute HF population.

The blunted loop diuretic response in acute heart failure is driven by reduced tubular responsiveness rather than insufficient tubular delivery. The role of furosemide urine excretion on diuretic and natriuretic response in acute heart failure

AIMS

Diuretic response in heart failure is blunted when compared to healthy individuals, but the pathophysiology underlying this phenomenon is unclear. We aimed to investigate whether the diuretic resistance mechanism is related to insufficient furosemide tubular delivery or low tubular responsiveness.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a prospective, observational study of 50 patients with acute heart failure patients divided into two groups based on previous furosemide use (furosemide naïve: n = 28 [56%] and chronic furosemide users: n = 22 [44%]). Each patient received a protocol-derived, standardized furosemide dose based on body weight. We measured diuretic response and urine furosemide concentrations. The furosemide naïve group had significantly higher urine volumes and natriuresis when compared to chronic users at all timepoints (all p < 0.05). Urine furosemide delivery was similar in furosemide naïve versus chronic users after accounting for differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (28.02 [21.03-35.89] vs. 29.70 [18.19-34.71] mg, p = 0.87). However, the tubular response to delivered diuretic was dramatically higher in naïve versus chronic users, that is the urine volume per 1 μg/ml of urine furosemide at 2 h was 148.6 ± 136.1 versus 50.6 ± 56.1 ml (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients naïve to furosemide have significantly better diuresis and natriuresis when compared to chronic furosemide users. The blunted diuretic response in patients with chronic loop diuretic exposure is driven by decreased tubular responsiveness rather than insufficient furosemide tubular delivery.

Role of dietary sodium restriction in chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dietary sodium restriction remains a guidelines-approved lifestyle recommendation for chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, its efficacy in clinical outcome improvement is dubious.

OBJECTIVE

The study evaluated whether dietary sodium restriction in CHF reduces clinical events.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the following databases: Academic Search Ultimate, ERIC, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Library (trials) to find studies analysing the impact of sodium restriction in the adult CHF population. Both observational and interventional studies were included. Exclusion criteria included i.e.: sodium consumption assessment based only on natriuresis, in-hospital interventions or mixed interventions-e.g. sodium and fluid restriction in one arm only. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed for the endpoints reported in at least 3 papers. Analyses were conducted in Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.

RESULTS

Initially, we screened 9175 articles. Backward snowballing revealed 1050 additional articles. Eventually, 9 papers were evaluated in the meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, HF-related hospitalizations and the composite of mortality and hospitalisation were reported in 8, 6 and 3 articles, respectively. Sodium restriction was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (OR 4.12 [95% CI 1.23-13.82]) and did not significantly affect the all-cause mortality (OR 1.38 [95% CI 0.76-2.49]) or HF hospitalisation (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.69-3.88]).

CONCLUSIONS

In a meta-analysis, sodium restriction in CHF patients worsened the prognosis in terms of a composite of mortality and hospitalizations and did not influence all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation rate.

A comprehensive review of acute cardio-renal syndrome: need for novel biomarkers

Cardiorenal syndrome represents a wide-spectrum disorder involving the heart and kidneys as the primary affected organs. India has an increasingly high burden of acute CRS, coinciding with the rise in global statistics. Up to 2022, approximately 46.1% of all cardiorenal patients have been diagnosed with acute CRS in India. Acute CRS involves a sudden deterioration of kidney functionalities, referred to as acute kidney injury (AKI) in acute heart failure patients. The pathophysiology of CRS involves hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) following acute myocardial stress. The pathological phenotype of acute CRS is associated with perturbed inflammatory, cellular, and neurohormonal markers in circulation. These complications increase the risk of mortality in clinically diagnosed acute CRS patients, making it a worldwide healthcare burden. Hence, effective diagnosis and early prevention are crucial to prevent the progression of CRS in AHF patients. Present biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (sCr), cystatin C (CysC), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum and/or urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and NT-proBNP, are clinically used to diagnose AKI stages in CRS patients but are limitedly sensitive to the early detection of the pathology. Therefore, the need for protein biomarkers is emerging for early intervention in CRS progression. Here, we summarized the cardio-renal nexus in acute CRS, with an emphasis on the present clinicopathological biomarkers and their limitations. The objective of this review is to highlight the need for novel proteomic biomarkers that will curb the burgeoning concern and direct future research trials.

Safety, Feasibility of Controllable Decrease of Vena Cava Pressure by Doraya Catheter in Heart Failure

Lowering elevated central venous pressure may reduce renal dysfunction in acute heart failure (AHF) patients. The Doraya catheter lowers renal venous pressure by creating a gradient in the inferior vena cava below the renal veins. Here, we present a first-in-human feasibility study of the Doraya catheter performed on 9 AHF patients. We assessed the safety, feasibility, and acute clinical (hemodynamic and renal) effects of transient Doraya catheter deployment when added to the standard diuretic-based regimen in AHF patients with a poor diuretic response. The procedures decreased central venous pressure from 18.4 ± 3.8 mm Hg to 12.4 ± 4.7 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and improved mean diuresis and clinical signs of congestion. No device-related serious adverse events were observed. Thus, Doraya catheter deployment was safe and feasible in AHF patients. (First In Human Study of the Doraya Catheter for the Treatment of AHF Patients; NCT03234647).

Renal Assessment in Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a complex, heterogeneous spectrum of symptoms that has kept cardiologists awake for decades. The heart failure (HF) population being burdened with multimorbidity poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges even for experienced clinicians. Adding deteriorated renal function to the equation, which is one of the strongest predictors of adverse outcome, we measure ourselves against possibly the biggest problem in modern cardiology. With the rapid development of new renal assessment methods, we can treat CRS more effectively than ever. The presented review focuses on explaining the pathophysiology, recent advances and current practices of monitoring renal function in patients with acute CRS. Understanding the dynamic interaction between the heart and the kidney may improve patient care and support the selection of an effective and nephroprotective treatment strategy.

Plasma renin activity variation following admission predicts patient outcome in acute decompensated heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction

Plasma renin activity (PRA) level at admission is reported to be a prognostic predictor of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients. Although PRA is affected during hospitalization by several factors including fluid volume and drug titration, whether the changes in PRA levels during hospitalization (ΔPRA) are associated with prognosis of ADHF patients are largely unknown.

PURPOSE

Investigate the predictive impact of ΔPRA on the prognosis of ADHF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

METHODS

Retrospectively analyzed consecutive 116 HFrEF and HFmrEF patients admitted for ADHF. PRA measurements were acquired at admission and at discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and HF re-hospitalization.

RESULTS

Out of 116 patients, 85 had PRA measurements both at admission and at discharge. Compared to admission, PRA level was significantly higher at discharge (0.8 (IQR 0.3-2.2) to 2.8 (IQR 1.0-7.2), p < 0.001). Tertiary groups ranked by PRA level on admission showed trend of poor prognosis in order of high, mid, and low PRA level (p = 0.07). On the contrary, PRA level at discharge significantly differentiated the prognosis and was poor in order of high, low, and mid (p = 0.026). Next, when the participants were divided into tertiary groups ranked by ΔPRA, prognosis worsened in the order of "minimal", "decreasing", and the "increasing" tier. Cubic splines analysis also indicate a similar tendency.

CONCLUSIONS

In ADHF patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF, patients with minimal ΔPRA showed the better prognosis over the those with either increasing or decreasing.

Serum Osmolarity and Vasopressin Concentration in Acute Heart Failure-Influence on Clinical Course and Outcome

Neurohormone activation plays an important role in Acute Heart Failure (AHF) pathophysiology. Serum osmolarity can affect this activation causing vasopressin excretion. The role of serum osmolarity and vasopressin concentration and its interaction remain still unexplored in AHF. The objective of our study was to evaluate the relationship of serum osmolarity with clinical parameters, vasopressin concentration, in-hospital course, and outcomes in AHF patients. The study group consisted of 338 AHF patients (male (76.3%), mean age of 68 ± 13 years) with serum osmolarity calculated by the equation: 1.86 × sodium [mmol/L] + (glucose [mg/dL]/18) + (urea [mg/dL]/2.8) + 9 and divided into osmolarity quartiles marked as: low: <287 mOsm/L, intermediate low: 287−294 mOsm/L, intermediate high: 295−304 mOsm/L, and high: >304 mOsm/L. There was an increasing age gradient in the groups and patients differed in the occurrence of comorbidities and baseline clinical and laboratory parameters. Importantly, analysis revealed that vasopressin presented a linear correlation with osmolarity (r = −0.221, p = 0.003) and its concentration decreased with quartiles (61.6 [44.0−81.0] vs. 57.8 [50.0−77.3] vs. 52.7 [43.1−69.2] vs. 45.0 [30.7−60.7] pg/mL, respectively, p = 0.034). This association across quartiles was observed among de novo AHF (63.6 [55.3−94.5] vs. 58.0 [50.7−78.6] vs. 52.0 [46.0−58.0] vs. 38.0 [27.0−57.0] pg/mL, respectively, p = 0.022) and was not statistically significant in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (59.5 [37.4−80.0] vs. 52.0 [38.0−74.5] vs. 57.0 [38.0−79.0] vs. 50.0 [33.0−84.0] pg/mL, respectively, p = 0.849). The worsening of renal function episodes were more frequent in quartiles with higher osmolarity (4 vs. 2 vs. 13 vs. 11%, respectively, p = 0.018) and patients that belonged to the quartiles with low and high osmolarity were characterized more often by incidence of worsening heart failure (20 vs. 9 vs. 10 vs. 22%, respectively, p = 0.032). There was also a U-shape distribution in relation to one-year mortality (31 vs. 19 vs. 23 vs. 37%, respectively, p = 0.022). In conclusion, there was an association of serum osmolarity with clinical status and both in-hospital and out-of-hospital outcomes. Moreover, the linear dependence between vasopressin concentration and serum osmolarity in the AHF population was identified and was driven mainly by patients with de novo AHF which suggests different pathophysiological paths in ADHF and AHF de novo.

Biomarkers in heart failure: Relevance in the clinical practice

Early detection and risk stratification of patients with heart failure (HF) are crucial to improve outcomes. Given the complexity of the pathophysiological processes of HF and the involvement of multi-organ systems in different stages of HF, clinical prognostication of HF can be challenging. In this regard, several biomarkers have been investigated for diagnosis, screening, and risk stratification of HF patients. These biomarkers can be classified as biomarkers of myocardial stretch such as B-type natriuretic peptide, biomarkers of neurohormonal activation, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress and biomarkers of cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis and remodeling. In this paper, we summarize current evidence supporting the use of selected biomarkers in HF. We review their diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic role in the management of HF. We also discuss potential factors limiting the use of these novel biomarkers in the clinical practice and highlight the challenges of adopting a multi-biomarker strategy.

Novel Biomarkers of Renal Dysfunction and Congestion in Heart Failure

Heart failure is a major public health problem and, despite the constantly emerging, new, effective treatments, it remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Reliable tools for early diagnosis and risk stratification are crucial in the management of HF. This explains a growing interest in the development of new biomarkers related to various pathophysiological mechanisms of HF. In the course of this review, we focused on the markers of congestion and renal dysfunction in terms of their interference with cardiovascular homeostasis. Congestion is a hallmark feature of heart failure, contributing to symptoms, morbidity, and hospitalizations of patients with HF and has, therefore, become a therapeutic target in AHF. On the other hand, impaired renal function by altering the volume status contributes to the development and progression of HF and serves as a marker of an adverse clinical outcome. Early detection of congestion and an adequate assessment of renal status are essential for the prompt administration of patient-tailored therapy. This review provides an insight into recent advances in the field of HF biomarkers that could be potentially implemented in diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with HF.