Thoracic aorta diameters in Marfan patients: Intraindividual comparison of 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) with transthoracic echocardiography

Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography of the abdominal arteries: intraindividual comparison between relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) and 4D contrast-enhanced MR-angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (REACT), a novel 3D isotropic flow-independent non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (non-CE-MRA) for imaging of the abdominal arteries, by comparing image quality and assessment of vessel stenosis intraindidually with 4D CE-MRA.

METHODS

Thirty patients (mean age 35.7 ± 16.8 years; 20 females) referred for the assessment of the arterial abdominal vasculature at 3 T were included in this retrospective, single-centre study. The protocol comprised both 4D CE-MRA and REACT (navigator-triggering, Compressed SENSE factor 10, nominal scan time 02:54 min, and reconstructed voxel size 0.78 × 0.78 × 0.85  mm3). Two radiologists independently evaluated 14 abdominal artery segments for stenoses, anatomical variants, and vascular findings (aortic dissection, abdominal aorta aneurysms and its branches). Subjective image quality was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic, 4 = excellent).

RESULTS

REACT had a total acquisition time of 5:36 ± 00:40 min, while 4D CE-MRA showed a total acquisition time (including the native scan and bolus tracking sequence) of 3:45 ± 00:59 min (p = 0.001). Considering 4D CE-MRA as the reference standard, REACT achieved a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 100.0% for relevant (≥ 50%) stenosis while detecting 89.5% of all vascular findings other than stenosis. For all vessels combined, subjective vessel quality was slightly higher in 4D CE-MRA (3.0 [IQR: 2.0; 4.0.]; P = 0.040), although comparable to REACT (3.0 [IQR: 2.0; 3.5]).

CONCLUSION

In a short scan time of about 5 min, REACT provides good diagnostic performance for detection of relevant stenoses, variants, and vascular findings of the abdominal arteries, while yielding to 4D CE-MRA comparable image quality.

Assessment of the thoracic aorta after aortic root replacement and/or ascending aortic surgery using 3D relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering

Objective

Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) is a novel 3D isotropic flow-independent non-contrast-enhanced MRA (non-CE-MRA) and has shown promising results in imaging of the thoracic aorta, primarily in patients without prior aortic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of REACT after surgery of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta by performing an intraindividual comparison to CE-MRA.

Material and methods

This retrospective single center study included 58 MRI studies of 34 patients [mean age at first examination 45.64 ± 11.13 years, 31 (53.44%) female] after ascending aortic surgery. MRI was performed at 1.5T using REACT (ECG- and respiratory-triggering, Compressed SENSE factor 9, acquired spatial resolution 1.69 × 1.70 × 1.70 mm3) and untriggered 3D CE-MRA. Independently, two radiologists measured maximum and minimum vessel diameters (inner-edge) and evaluated image quality and motion artifacts on 5-point scales (5 = excellent) for the following levels: mid-graft, distal anastomosis, ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta. Additionally, readers evaluated MRAs for the presence of aortic dissection (AD) and graded the quality of depiction as well as their diagnostic confidence using 5-point scales (5 = excellent).

Results

Vessel diameters were comparable between CE-MRA and REACT (total acquisition time: 05:42 ± 00:38 min) with good to excellent intersequence agreement (ICC = 0.86-0.96). At the distal anastomosis (minimum/maximum, p < .001/p = .002) and at the ascending aorta (minimum/maximum, p = .002/p = .06), CE-MRA yielded slightly larger diameters. Image quality for all levels combined was higher in REACT [median (IQR); 3.6 (3.2-3.93) vs. 3.9 (3.6-4.13), p = .002], with statistically significant differences at mid-graft [3.0 (2.5-3.63) vs. 4.0 (4.0-4.0), p < .001] and ascending aorta [3.25 (3.0-4.0) vs. 4.0 (3.5-4.0), p < .001]. Motion artifacts were more present in CE-MRA at all levels (p < .001). Using CE-MRA as the standard of reference, readers detected all 25 cases of residual AD [Stanford type A: 21 (84.0%); Stanford type B: 4 (16.0%)] in REACT with equal quality of depiction [4.0 (3.0-4.5) vs. 4.0 (3.0-4.0), p = .41] and diagnostic confidence [4.0 (3.0-4.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0-4.0), p = .81) in both sequences.

Conclusions

This study indicates the feasibility of REACT for assessment of the thoracic aorta after ascending aortic surgery and expands its clinical use for gadolinium-free MRA to these patients.

Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 1.5 Tesla Using Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT)

PURPOSE

To evaluate a novel flow-independent sequence (Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (REACT)) for imaging of the extracranial arteries in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) at 1.5 T.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 47 AIS patients who received REACT (scan time: 3:01 min) and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) of the extracranial arteries at 1.5 T in clinical routine. Two radiologists assessed scans for proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, stated their diagnostic confidence and rated the image quality of cervical arteries, impact of artifacts and image noise. Apparent signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (aSNR/aCNR) were measured for the common carotid artery and ICA.

RESULTS

REACT achieved a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 97.3% for ICA stenoses in high agreement with CE-MRA (κ = 0.83) with equal diagnostic confidence (p = 0.22). Image quality was rated higher for CE-MRA at the aortic arch (p = 0.002) and vertebral arteries (p < 0.001), whereas REACT provided superior results for the extracranial ICA (p = 0.008). Both sequences were only slightly affected by artifacts (p = 0.60), while image noise was more pronounced in CE-MRA (p < 0.001) in line with higher aSNR (p < 0.001) and aCNR (p < 0.001) values in REACT for all vessels.

CONCLUSION

Given its good diagnostic performance while yielding comparable image quality and scan time to CE-MRA, REACT may be suitable for the imaging of the extracranial arteries in acute ischemic stroke at 1.5 T.

A novel non-contrast agent-enhanced 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance sequence for congenital heart disease patients: the REACT Study

BACKGROUND

The three-dimensional balanced-steady-state-free-precession (3D bSSFP) whole-heart (WH) technique has long been used to depict cardiac morphology in congenital heart disease (CHD) but is prone to banding artifacts. The Relaxation Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) sequence is an alternative method that is resistant to off-resonance effects.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cardiac structures and great vessels in CHD patients using 3D WH REACT sequence and compare it to 3D WH bSSFP sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Thirty CHD patients were prospectively enrolled. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image quality, and cross-sectional area (CSA) were analyzed. Categorical data were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test and normally distributed variables with a t-test.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (16 females) participated in this study (median age 17, range 5 months to 52 years). REACT showed higher CNR in all pulmonary veins (all P<0.05), while 3D bSSFP had higher CNR in the right ventricle (P<0.001) and right pulmonary artery, (P=0.04). Image quality favored 3D bSSFP in the right atrium and ventricle (both P<0.001), main pulmonary artery (P=0.02), and coronary arteries (left: P<0.001, right: P=0.01). REACT outperformed 3D bSSFP for the pulmonary veins (all P<0.05) from image quality perspective. CSA measurements were not significantly different between REACT and 3D bSSFP (all P≥0.05).

CONCLUSION

The REACT method is associated with improved image quality and CNR for pulmonary veins, with CSA measurements concordant with 3D bSSFP in CHD patients, while bSSFP shows better performance for imaging cardiac chambers and coronary arteries.

Highly compressed SENSE accelerated relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) for fast non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the neck: Clinical evaluation in patients with acute ischemic stroke at 3 tesla

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long acquisition times limit the feasibility of established non-contrast-enhanced MRA (non-CE-MRA) techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a highly accelerated flow-independent sequence (Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering [REACT]) for imaging of the extracranial arteries in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Compressed SENSE (CS) accelerated (factor 7) 3D isotropic REACT (fixed scan time: 01:22 min, reconstructed voxel size 0.625 × 0.625 × 0.75 mm3) and CE-MRA (CS factor 6, scan time: 1:08 min, reconstructed voxel size 0.5 mm3) were acquired in 76 AIS patients (69.4 ± 14.3 years, 33 females) at 3 Tesla. Two radiologists assessed scans for the presence of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and stated their diagnostic confidence using a 5-point scale (5 = excellent). Vessel quality of cervical arteries as well as the impact of artifacts and image noise were scored on 5-point scales (5 = excellent/none). Apparent signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (aSNR/aCNR) were measured for the common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA (C1-segment).

RESULTS

REACT provided a sensitivity of 88.5% and specificity of 100% for clinically relevant (≥50%) ICA stenosis with substantial concordance to CE-MRA regarding stenosis grading (Cohen's kappa 0.778) and similar diagnostic confidence (REACT: mean 4.5 ± 0.4 vs. CE-MRA: 4.5 ± 0.6; P = 0.674). Presence of artifacts (3.6 ± 0.5 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7; P = 0.985) and vessel quality (all segments: 3.6 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.7; P = 0.004) were comparable between both techniques with REACT showing higher scores at the CCA (4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) and CE-MRA at V2- (3.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8; P < 0.001) and V3-segments (3.3 ± 0.5 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8; P < 0.001). For all vessels, REACT showed a lower impact of image noise (3.8 ± 0.6 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7; P = 0.024) while yielding higher aSNR (52.5 ± 15.1 vs. 37.9 ± 12.5; P < 0.001) and aCNR (49.4 ± 15.0 vs. 34.7 ± 12.3; P < 0.001) for all vessels combined.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute ischemic stroke, highly accelerated REACT provides an accurate detection of ICA stenosis with vessel quality and scan time comparable to CE-MRA.

The feasibility of relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering for preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background

Cardiovascular MRI is advantageous in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) planning. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of comprehensive non-contrast MRI [relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT)] combined with a three-dimensional whole-heart MRI protocol for preprocedural planning of TAVI vs. computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Methods

Thirty patients with severe aortic stenosis were prospectively enrolled. The anatomical properties of the aortic root anatomy, including the perimeter and area of the virtual aortic valve annulus and coronary heights, were determined from 3D whole-heart MRI and cardiac CTA (CCTA) images, respectively. The diameters of the aorta (thoracic and abdominal aorta) and iliofemoral arteries were measured from REACT and aortic CTA (ACTA) images, respectively. A paired t-test was used to compare these two modalities. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess cardiovascular MRI and CTA measurements. Transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing was performed based on CCTA measurements and compared with 3D whole-heart MRI measurements. The extent of annular calcification on 3D whole-heart MRI images was evaluated by a four-point grading scale and compared with CCTA data.

Results

All 30 patients completed CTA and cardiovascular MRI examinations, with the TAVI procedure being administered in 25 patients. The mean acquisition time of the comprehensive MRI protocol was 18 ± 3.2 min. There were no significant differences between ACTA and REACT data in regard to the diameters of aortic and iliofemoral arteries, including the ascending thoracic aorta (37 ± 4.6 mm vs. 37.7 ± 5.2 mm, p = 0.085), descending thoracic aorta (24.3 ± 2.8 mm vs. 24.3 ± 2.8 mm, p = 0.832), abdominal aorta (20.9 ± 2.5 mm vs. 20.8 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.602), bilateral common iliac arteries (right: 8.36 ± 1.44 mm vs. 8.42 ± 1.27 mm, p = 0.590; left: 8.61 ± 1.71 mm vs. 8.86 ± 1.46 mm, p = 0.050), and bilateral femoral arteries (right: 6.77 ± 1.06 mm vs. 6.87 ± 1.00 mm, p = 0.157; left: 6.75 ± 1.02 mm vs. 6.90 ± 0.80 mm, p = 0.142). Both modalities showed similar aortic valve morphology and semi-quantitative valve calcification (all, p's > 0.05). Overall agreement for implanted THV was found in all 25 (100%) patients assessed with both modalities.

Conclusion

REACT combined with 3D whole-heart MRI enables reliable measurements of aortic root anatomy, annular calcification, and aorta and iliofemoral access in patients under evaluation for TAVI.