Alcoholic fermentation drives the selection of Oenococcus oeni strains in wine but not in cider

Wine Fermentation as a Model System for Microbial Ecology and Evolution

In vitro microbial communities have proven to be invaluable model systems for studying ecological and evolutionary processes experimentally. However, it remains unclear whether quantitative insights obtained from these laboratory systems can be applied to complex communities assembling and evolving in their natural ecological context. To bridge the gap between the lab and the 'real-world', there is a need for laboratory model systems that better approximate natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Wine fermentation presents an ideal system for this purpose, balancing experimental tractability with rich ecological and evolutionary dynamics. In this perspective piece we outline the key features that make wine fermentation a fruitful model system for ecologists and evolutionary biologists. We highlight the diversity of environmentally mediated interactions that shape community dynamics during fermentation, the complex evolutionary history of wine microbial populations, and the opportunity to study the impact of complex ecologies on evolutionary dynamics. By integrating knowledge from both wine research and microbial ecology and evolution we aim to enhance understanding and foster collaboration between these fields.

Enhancing wine malolactic fermentation: Variable effect of yeast mannoproteins on Oenococcus oeni strains

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), principally Oenococcus oeni, play crucial roles in wine production, contributing to the transformation of L-malic acid into L-lactic acid during malolactic fermentation (MLF). This fermentation is influenced by different factors, including the initial LAB population and wine stress factors, such as nutrient availability. Yeast mannoproteins can enhance LAB survival in wine. This study explored in model conditions the impact of a commercial mannoprotein extract on MLF dynamics in ten O. oeni strains. The results revealed strain-specific responses in fermentation kinetics and mannoprotein utilization. Mannoprotein addition influenced MLF outcomes, depending on the strain and concentration. The variability in MLF confirmed different technological aptitude of the strains used. The α-mannosidase enzymatic activity was determined and showed higher values in the supernatant than in whole cells. Moreover, α-mannosidase activity varied among strains, suggesting differential regulation in response to fermentation conditions. These findings highlight the importance of understanding mannoprotein interactions with O. oeni for optimizing MLF efficiency and enhancing wine quality. Further research under cellar conditions is needed to evaluate the potential of yeast mannoproteins to promote MLF.

Research on Engineering the Saccharomyces uvarum for Constructing a High Efficiency to Degrade Malic Acid and Low Yield of Diacetyl Biosynthesis Pathway

Diacetyl is a flavor compound in wine with a low threshold (1-2 mg/L). It is produced during alcoholic fermentation (AF) Saccharomyces and malolactic fermentation (MLF) initiated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Whereas, the environment after AF suppresses the normal metabolism of LAB after AF. Researchs have shown the influence on diacetyl mechanisms of the genes ILV2, ILV6, ILV3, ILV5, BDH1, BDH2, and gene aldB from Lactobacillus plantarum in Saccharomyce uvarum WY1. While we found that the diacetyl contents produced by mutants after MLF (Co-fermentation and Seq-fermentation) were significantly improved compared to AF alone. Moreover, the genes mae1 and mae2 from S. pombe, and gene mleS from L. lactis exhibited significant effect on deacidification in our previous study, but the diacetyl of the mutants showed obvious improvement in this study. Thus the effects of association mutation of genes (ILV2, ILV6, ILV3, ILV5, BDH1, BDH2, aldB, mae1, and mleS) on deacidification, diacetyl and other flavors (organic acids, higher alcohols and esters) metabolism in S. uvarum after AF were detected in the study. Among all the mutants, strains V6AmS, V635mS, and V6B12mS showed the most favorable results. Specifically, the L-malic acid contents decreased to 1.26 g/L, 1.18 g/L, and 1.19 g/L, respectively. Concurrently, diacetyl levels were reduced by 52.56%, 61.84%, and 65.31%. The production of n-propanol increased by 18.84%, 20.89%, and 28.12%, whereas isobutanol levels decreased by 37.01%, 42.36%, and 44.04%, and isoamyl alcohol levels decreased by 19.28%, 19.79%, and 16.74%, compared to the parental strain WY1. Additionally, the concentration of lactate ester in the wine increased to 13.162 mg/L, 14.729 mg/L, and 14.236 mg/L, respectively.

Viability and Diversity of the Microbial Cultures Available in Retail Kombucha Beverages in the USA

Kombucha is a two-stage fermented sweetened tea beverage that uses yeast and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to convert sugars into ethanol and lactate and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) to oxidize ethanol to acetate. Its popularity as a beverage grew from claims of health benefits derived from this vibrant microbial bioconversion. While recent studies have shed light on the diversity of cultures in Kombucha fermentation, there is limited information on the diversity, and especially viability, of cultures in retail beverages that advertise the presence of Kombucha and probiotic cultures. In this study, 12 Kombucha beverages produced by different manufacturers throughout the US were purchased and microbially characterized. Eight of the beverages contained viable Kombucha cultures, while 3 of the remaining 4 had viable Bacillus cultures as added probiotics. Amplicon profiling revealed that all contained Kombucha yeast and bacteria cells. The dominant yeasts detected were Lachancea cidri (10/12), Brettanomyces (9/12), Malassezia (6/12), and Saccharomyces (5/12). Dominant LAB included Liquorilactobacillus and Oenococcus oeni, and AAB were Komagataeibacter, Gluconobacter, and Acetobacter. One beverage had a significant amount of Zymomonas mobilis, an ethanol-producing bacterium from Agave cactus. While Kombucha beverages differ in the types and viability of cultures, all except one beverage contained detectable viable cells.

Application of white wine lees for promoting lactic acid bacteria growth and malolactic fermentation in wine

In the context of ecological transition, the use of wine by-products for industrial applications is a major challenge. Wine lees, the second wine by-product in terms of quantity, represent a source of nutrients that can be used for stimulating the growth of microorganisms. Here, white wine lees were used as a stimulating agent for the growth of wine lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and to promote wine malolactic fermentation (MLF) driven out by Oenococcus oeni. By adding freeze-dried wine lees to wines under different conditions - including different wine lees at different concentrations and different O. oeni strains at various initial populations - it was observed that wine lees can enhance the growth of LAB and reduce the duration of MLF. The chemical composition of wines was also evaluated, proving that wine lees do not compromise the quality of the wines. In addition, wine lees did not seem to promote the growth of spoilage microorganisms like as Brettanomyces bruxellensis. Altogether, this work reports the possibility of recovering the lees of white wine to obtain a product favoring the MLF of red wines. More general, we propose a recycling strategy of wine by-products to obtain new products for winemaking.

Influence of pH on Oenococcus oeni metabolism: Can the slowdown of citrate consumption improve its acid tolerance?

Oenococcus oeni is the lactic acid bacteria most suited to carry out malolactic fermentation in wine, converting L-malic acid into L-lactic acid and carbon dioxide, thereby deacidifying wines. Indeed, wine is a harsh environment for microbial growth, partly because of its low pH. By metabolizing citrate, O. oeni maintains its homeostasis under acid conditions. Indeed, citrate consumption activates the proton motive force, helps to maintain intracellular pH, and enhances bacterial growth when it is co-metabolized with sugars. In addition, citrate metabolism is responsible for diacetyl production, an aromatic compound which bestows a buttery character to wine. However, an inhibitory effect of citrate on O. oeni growth at low pH has been highlighted in recent years. In order to understand how citrate metabolism can be linked to the acid tolerance of this bacterium, consumption of citrate was investigated in eleven O. oeni strains. In addition, malate and sugar consumptions were also monitored, as they can be impacted by citrate metabolism. This experiment highlighted the huge diversity of metabolisms between strains depending on their origin. It also showed the capacity of O. oeni to de novo metabolize certain end-products such as L-lactate and mannitol, a phenomenon never before demonstrated. It also enabled drawing hypotheses concerning the two positive effects that the slowing down of citrate metabolism could have on biomass production and malolactic fermentation occurring under low pH conditions.