1
|
Laker C, Knight-Davidson P, Hawkes D, Driver P, Nightingale M, Winter A, McVicar A. The Use of 360-Degree Video in Developing Emotional Coping Skills (Reduced Anxiety and Increased Confidence) in Mental Health Nursing Students: A Protocol Paper. NURSING REPORTS 2022; 12:536-544. [PMID: 35894042 PMCID: PMC9326566 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep12030052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Higher education institutions are uniquely placed to introduce emotional coping skills to promote resilience in pre-registration nurses in order to reduce anxiety and increase confidence before they enter clinical placement for the first time. In this qualitative study, we will explore the use of a 360-degree video in developing skills for coping. The participants will be mental health nursing students. We will develop a 360-degree video in collaboration with a mental health service user. All participants will watch the video. A sub-group will receive a supportive clinical supervision discussion within a cognitive reappraisal/solution-focused/VERA framework. We will record the experiences of the participant to explore: (1) how students felt about the use of 360-degree video, as an education tool to build skills of resilience; (2) whether the students involved felt more confident and less anxious about the situation in the video as a result of participating in the cognitive reappraisal/solution-focused/VERA supervision discussion.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lammas F, Phillips A, Dopson S, Joyce E, Csipke E, Wykes T. The organisational climate of NHS Early Intervention Services (EIS) for psychosis: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:509. [PMID: 35428229 PMCID: PMC9013142 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07790-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cognitive remediation (CR) therapy for psychosis significantly improves recovery but is yet to be widely implemented in NHS services. It is likely to be of value at the earliest stages of psychosis development – at the first episode. Organisational climate is one factor likely to affect implementation into Early Intervention Services (EIS), which serve those experiencing first episode psychosis. We aimed to understand the organisational climate within UK NHS Early Intervention for Psychosis (EIP) services and the barriers and facilitators for the introduction of CR. Methods We conducted semi structured interviews with 42 EIS members of four teams in four NHS Trusts. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results There were differences between teams, including leadership style, involvement in decision making and willingness to adopt CR. Resource shortages were considered the main barrier for implementation across all teams. The evidence base behind CR and the recognition of there being a clinical need was seen as the main facilitator. Teams with more democratic leadership, and knowledge of both the evidence base and need for CR, may feel better able to successfully incorporate it into their service. Conclusion Despite enthusiasm for novel treatments, EIS teams are limited by their resources. An understanding of the local organisational variables can help teams establish a culture that values innovation. Clear communication of the evidence base for CR is key to help enable staff to implement novel treatments successfully despite these limited resources and time pressures. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07790-0.
Collapse
|
3
|
Berry K, Raphael J, Wilson H, Bucci S, Drake RJ, Edge D, Emsley R, Gilworth G, Lovell K, Odebiyi B, Price O, Sutton M, Winter R, Haddock G. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a ward-based intervention to improve access to psychologically-informed care and psychological therapy for mental health in-patients. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:82. [PMID: 35114980 PMCID: PMC8815159 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03696-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is good evidence that psychological interventions improve patient well-being and independent living, but patients on acute mental health wards often do not have access to evidence-based psychological therapies which are strongly advised by NICE guidance for severe mental health problems. The overall aim of this programme of work is to increase patient access to psychological therapies on acute mental health inpatient wards. Stage one of the programme (which is complete) aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to delivering therapy in these settings through a large qualitative study. The key output of stage one was an intervention protocol that is designed to be delivered on acute wards to increase patient access to psychologically-informed care and therapy. Stage two of the programme aims to test the effects of the intervention on patient wellbeing and serious incidents on the ward (primary outcomes), patient social functioning and symptoms, staff burnout, ward atmosphere from staff and patient perspectives and cost effectiveness of the intervention (secondary outcomes). METHODS The study is a single blind, pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial and will recruit thirty-four wards across England that will be randomised to receive the new intervention plus treatment as usual, or treatment as usual only. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 6-month and 9-month follow-ups, with serious incidents on the ward collected at an additional 3-month follow-up. DISCUSSION The key output will be a potentially effective and cost-effective ward-based psychological intervention that increases patient access to psychological therapy in inpatient settings, is feasible to deliver in inpatient settings and is acceptable to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03950388. Registered 15th May 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03950388.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. .,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Jessica Raphael
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Wilson
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Drake
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Dawn Edge
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gill Gilworth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bolanle Odebiyi
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Owen Price
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Winter
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gillian Haddock
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dickens GL, Johnson A, Steel K, Everett B, Tonkin M. Interventions to Improve Social Climate in Acute Mental Health Inpatient Settings: Systematic Review of Content and Outcomes. SAGE Open Nurs 2022; 8:23779608221124291. [PMID: 36533258 PMCID: PMC9749049 DOI: 10.1177/23779608221124291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quantification of the social climate of mental health care environments has received considerable attention. Investigations of the resulting measures indicate that social climate is associated with individual outcomes including patient satisfaction and staff burnout. Interest has grown in developing interventions to improve social climate in anticipation of subsequent related benefits. This study aimed to identify and critically review research about the effectiveness of interventions for improving social climate in inpatient adult acute mental health settings. METHODS Systematic review reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Comprehensive terms were used to search multiple electronic databases from inception to July 2019. Information about intervention type(s), complexity was extracted and study quality was assessed. RESULTS Twenty-three papers met inclusion criteria of which 20 used a pretest-posttest study design and three employed randomized and/or controlled designs. Interventions were environmental/structural, operational/process-oriented and developmental/person-oriented in nature and they ranged in complexity. The Ward Atmosphere Scale was the most common outcome measure used. Following quality assessment, six studies were judged to be sufficiently robust in terms of quality, theory-base, user-inclusion, and outcomes evaluation to contribute credibly to the evidence base. Of these, four complex person- and process-oriented intervention studies and two less complex structural/environmental intervention studies resulted in positive outcomes. CONCLUSION There is limited strong evidence that interventions positively influence measures of ward social climate in acute adult mental health settings. Such measures should not be the sole criterion of success when evaluating change. Decisions about implementing change to improve social climate should be informed by meaningful proxy measures including the views and preferences of service users and other stakeholders. Studies using stronger designs are required to establish the ability of interventions to improve social climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey L. Dickens
- Centre for Applied Nursing Research, South Western Sydney Local Health District and Western Sydney University, Ingham Institute for Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Alisha Johnson
- South Western Sydney Local Health District Mental Health Service, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kelly Steel
- South Western Sydney Local Health District Mental Health Service, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bronwyn Everett
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Tonkin
- School of Criminology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raphael J, Hutchinson T, Haddock G, Emsley R, Bucci S, Lovell K, Edge D, Price O, Udachina A, Day C, Cross C, Peak C, Drake R, Berry K. A study on the feasibility of delivering a psychologically informed ward-based intervention on an acute mental health ward. Clin Psychol Psychother 2021; 28:1587-1597. [PMID: 33843107 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Acute mental health inpatient wards have been criticized for being nontherapeutic. The study aimed to test the feasibility of delivering a psychologically informed intervention in these settings. This single-arm study evaluated the feasibility of clinical psychologists delivering a ward-based psychological service model over a 6-month period on two acute mental health wards. Data were gathered to assess trial design parameters and the feasibility of gathering patient/staff outcome data. Psychologists were able to deliver key elements of the intervention. Baseline staff and patient participant recruitment targets were met. However, there was significant patient attrition at follow-up, with incorrect contact details on discharge being the primary reason. Implementation of a ward-based psychological intervention appears feasible when implemented flexibly. It is feasible to recruit staff and patient participants and to collect staff outcome measures over a 6-month period. However, greater efforts need to be taken to trace patient movement following discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Raphael
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Taryn Hutchinson
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gillian Haddock
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dawn Edge
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Owen Price
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alisa Udachina
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine Day
- Acute Inpatient Services Tameside and Glossop, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - Catherine Cross
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Craig Peak
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Drake
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baker J, Berzins K, Canvin K, Benson I, Kellar I, Wright J, Lopez RR, Duxbury J, Kendall T, Stewart D. Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings: the COMPARE systematic mapping review. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesThe study aimed to provide a mapping review of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings; classify intervention components using the behaviour change technique taxonomy; explore evidence of behaviour change techniques and interventions; and identify the behaviour change techniques that show most effectiveness and those that require further testing.BackgroundIncidents involving violence and aggression occur frequently in adult mental health inpatient settings. They often result in restrictive practices such as restraint and seclusion. These practices carry significant risks, including physical and psychological harm to service users and staff, and costs to the NHS. A number of interventions aim to reduce the use of restrictive practices by using behaviour change techniques to modify practice. Some interventions have been evaluated, but effectiveness research is hampered by limited attention to the specific components. The behaviour change technique taxonomy provides a common language with which to specify intervention content.DesignSystematic mapping study and analysis.Data sourcesEnglish-language health and social care research databases, and grey literature, including social media. The databases searched included British Nursing Index (BNI), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), EMBASE, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database, HTA Canadian and International, Ovid MEDLINE®, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), PsycInfo®and PubMed. Databases were searched from 1999 to 2019.Review methodsBroad literature search; identification, description and classification of interventions using the behaviour change technique taxonomy; and quality appraisal of reports. Records of interventions to reduce any form of restrictive practice used with adults in mental health services were retrieved and subject to scrutiny of content, to identify interventions; quality appraisal, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; and data extraction, regarding whether participants were staff or service users, number of participants, study setting, intervention type, procedures and fidelity. The resulting data set for extraction was guided by the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research, Cochrane and theory coding scheme recommendations. The behaviour change technique taxonomy was applied systematically to each identified intervention. Intervention data were examined for overarching patterns, range and frequency. Overall percentages of behaviour change techniques by behaviour change technique cluster were reported. Procedures used within interventions, for example staff training, were described using the behaviour change technique taxonomy.ResultsThe final data set comprised 221 records reporting 150 interventions, 109 of which had been evaluated. The most common evaluation approach was a non-randomised design. There were six randomised controlled trials. Behaviour change techniques from 14 out of a possible 16 clusters were detected. Behaviour change techniques found in the interventions were most likely to be those that demonstrated statistically significant effects. The most common intervention target was seclusion and restraint reduction. The most common strategy was staff training. Over two-thirds of the behaviour change techniques mapped onto four clusters, that is ‘goals and planning’, ‘antecedents’, ‘shaping knowledge’ and ‘feedback and monitoring’. The number of behaviour change techniques identified per intervention ranged from 1 to 33 (mean 8 techniques).LimitationsMany interventions were poorly described and might have contained additional behaviour change techniques that were not detected. The finding that the evidence was weak restricted the study’s scope for examining behaviour change technique effectiveness. The literature search was restricted to English-language records.ConclusionsStudies on interventions to reduce restrictive practices appear to be diverse and poor. Interventions tend to contain multiple procedures delivered in multiple ways.Future workPrior to future commissioning decisions, further research to enhance the evidence base could help address the urgent need for effective strategies. Testing individual procedures, for example, audit and feedback, could ascertain which are the most effective intervention components. Separate testing of individual components could improve understanding of content and delivery.Study registrationThe study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018086985.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Baker
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Krysia Canvin
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Iris Benson
- Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, UK
| | - Ian Kellar
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Judy Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Joy Duxbury
- Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Duncan Stewart
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Laker C, Cella M, Callard F, Wykes T. The impact of ward climate on staff perceptions of barriers to research-driven service changes on mental health wards: A cross-sectional study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2020; 27:281-295. [PMID: 31755618 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: To date, improvements on U.K. acute mental health wards have been difficult to sustain. The barriers to change may be context dependent. Mental health wards are volatile workplaces with service user violence/aggression, frequent staff and patient changes, and ongoing service improvements. The evidence suggests that burnout affects staff perceptions of barriers to change, and ward climate affects burnout. As two potentially important, independent predictors of staff perceptions of barriers to change, the impact of ward climate and burnout on how staff regard changes should be considered. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Elements of ward climate such as high numbers of incidents and temporary staff independently worsened mental health staff perceptions of barriers to change, in addition to negative impacts from burnout and occupational status. How staff perceived ward climate was also linked their perceptions of barriers to change; however, burnout was no longer a significant consideration with these variables. Staff with low job satisfaction and high interaction anxiety also had low confidence regarding changes. Staff with low job satisfaction were also demotivated towards changes. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Ward climate is clearly an important factor in how nurses view organizational changes. In this study, nurses' perceptions of barriers to change were worse if they viewed ward climate negatively, or if temporary staff and incident numbers were high. Staff perceptions of ward climate and barriers to change should be assessed, ahead of service changes. Developing change strategies based on such information is likely to produce better implementation outcomes. Specifically, targeting staff confidence and motivation (which are barriers to change) may improve how staff regard their ward climate. Abstract Introduction To create successful change programmes for mental health wards, it is necessary to understand which aspects of ward climate prevent change. Question Does ward climate influence mental health nurse's perceptions of barriers to change? Method Random-effects models were used to test whether the following ward climate variables influenced the outcome measure "staff perceptions of barriers to change" (VOCALISE) and its subscales (powerlessness/confidence/demotivation): (a) Perceptions of ward climate (VOTE: subscales included work intensity/job satisfaction/interaction anxiety). (b) Ward climate indicators (incidents/detention under the Mental Health Act (2007)/staffing/bed pressure). As known predictors of VOCALISE, burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory) and occupational status were included in the models. Results Perceptions of ward climate (VOTE), incidents, temporary staff, occupational status and burnout significantly and negatively affected perceptions of barriers to change (VOCALISE). Staff with low job satisfaction (VOTE) and high interaction anxiety (VOTE) also had low confidence (VOCALISE). Staff with low job satisfaction (VOTE) were also demotivated (VOCALISE). Discussion Ward climate is an important predictor of how staff regard service changes in mental health wards. Implications for practice Staff perceptions of ward climate and barriers to change should be assessed ahead of service changes to identify pressures that impede progress and lower morale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Laker
- Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Matteo Cella
- Department of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Felicity Callard
- Birkbeck's Department of Psychosocial Studies, University of London, London, UK
| | - Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berry S, Robertson N. Burnout within forensic psychiatric nursing: Its relationship with ward environment and effective clinical supervision? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2019; 26:212-222. [PMID: 31209980 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT?: Burnout is a prominent issue in psychiatric nursing and associated with significant adverse consequences for staff, service users and at an organizational level. Exploration of the extent and predictors of burnout in secure settings has received little research attention. It is not fully understood why prevalence rates of burnout in forensic settings are not elevated in comparison to other settings, despite the presence of known risk-related correlates. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: In contrast to previous research, findings suggest that clinical supervision may not be an effective, stand-alone intervention to support staff experiencing burnout. Thus, the current focus on clinical supervision to mitigate burnout may be insufficient in forensic services. The ward environment (specifically how safe staff feel, how therapeutic the ward feels and how well service users relate to one another) was found to be more important than clinical supervision in terms of burnout for forensic psychiatric nursing staff. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Policies regarding staff health and well-being should be developed with due consideration given to the association between burnout and the working environment. It should not be assumed that clinical supervision is sufficient to mitigate burnout in practice. Further research assessing all types of support and the ward environment is needed to gain a better understanding of its relationship to burnout. ABSTRACT: Introduction Despite extensive research examining burnout in psychiatric nursing staff, literature exploring key predictors of burnout in secure psychiatric settings has been relatively neglected. Research has yet to explore burnout in these settings by adopting previously identified predictors such as support or the ward environment. Aim The current study aimed to reduce this gap by exploring burnout, the perceived effectiveness of clinical supervision and ward environment. Method In 2014, nursing staff working in a medium secure forensic psychiatric unit in the United Kingdom (N = 137) provided demographic information and completed the measures assessing: Burnout, clinical supervision and the ward environment. Results Approximately 10% of nursing staff could be classed as "burnt-out". The main predictors of burnout were age and ward environment. Clinical supervision had minimal association with burnout. Discussion The current study sheds doubt on clinical supervision as a potential intervention for burnout and results appear comparable to research within other settings. The implications of the ward environment, supervision and burnout are discussed herein. Implication for Practice Interventions may need to focus on a positive ward environment (including patient cohesion, experienced safety and enhancing the therapeutic atmosphere). Organizations should support younger nursing staff as they appear particularly vulnerable to burnout.
Collapse
|
9
|
Recovery-oriented training programmes for mental health professionals: A narrative literature review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mhp.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
10
|
Laker C, Cella M, Callard F, Wykes T. Why is change a challenge in acute mental health wards? A cross-sectional investigation of the relationships between burnout, occupational status and nurses' perceptions of barriers to change. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28:190-198. [PMID: 29993168 PMCID: PMC7328713 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Changes in UK psychiatric wards have been difficult to implement. Specific areas of nursing staff resistance remain unclear. Previous healthcare research suggests that burnout is common and that managers' regard changes more positively than direct care staff. We will therefore examine whether burnout and workforce characteristics influence psychiatric nurses' perceptions of barriers to change. Psychiatric nurses (N = 125) completed perceptions measures of 'barriers to change' (VOCALISE: subscales included 'powerlessness, confidence and demotivation'); and 'burnout' (Maslach Burnout Inventory: subscales included 'emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment and depersonalization '). Staff characteristics, such as length of employment, occupational status, education, ethnicity, gender and age, were also collected. Correlations between these measures informed random-effects regression models, which were conducted to predict the barriers to change score and to explore differential effects in the subscales of VOCALISE. Perceptions of barriers to change (VOCALISE) were correlated with burnout (r = 0.39), occupational status (r = -0.18) and age (r = 0.22). Burnout (Coef. β: 10.52; P > 0.001) and occupational status (Coef. β: -4.58; P = 0.05) predicted VOCALISE. Emotional exhaustion (Coef. β: 0.18; P < 0.001) and low personal accomplishment (Coef. β: 0.21; P = 0.001) predicted powerlessness. Emotional exhaustion predicted low motivation regarding changes (Coef. β: 0.11; P = 0.005). Low confidence predicted high levels of depersonalization (Coef β: 0.23; P = 0.01). Direct care staff expressed significantly more powerlessness (Coef. β: -2.60; P = 0.02) and significantly less confidence (Coef. β: -3.07; P = 0.002) than managers. For changes to be successful in psychiatric wards, burnout will need to be addressed. Future change strategies may consider involving direct care staff to improve perceptions of barriers to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Laker
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, London, UK.,Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Matteo Cella
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, London, UK
| | | | - Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Csipke E, Wykes T, Nash S, Williams P, Koeser L, McCrone P, Rose D, Craig T. Changing nurses' views of the therapeutic environment: randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open 2019; 5:e17. [PMID: 30762512 PMCID: PMC6381414 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2018.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patients value evidence-based therapeutic activities, little is known about nurses' perceptions.AimsTo investigate whether implementing an activities training programme would positively alter staff perceptions of the ward or be detrimental through the increased workload (trial registration: ISRCTN 06545047). METHOD We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial involving 16 wards with psychology-led nurse training as the intervention. The main outcome was a staff self-report measure of perceptions of the ward (VOTE) and secondary outcomes measuring potential deterioration were the Index of Work Satisfaction (IWS) and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Data were analysed using mixed-effects regression models, with repeated assessments from staff over time. RESULTS There were 1075 valid outcome measurements from 539 nursing staff. VOTE scores did not change over time (standardised effect size 0.04, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.18, P = 0.54), neither did IWS or MBI scores (IWS, standardised effect size 0.02, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.16, P = 0.74; MBI standardised effect size -0.09, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.06, P = 0.24). There was a mean increase of 1.5 activities per ward (95% CI -0.4 to 3.4, P = 0.12) and on average 6.3 more patients attended groups (95% CI -4.1 to 16.6, P = 0.23) following training. Staff feedback on training was positive. CONCLUSIONS Our training programme did not change nurses' perceptions of the ward, job satisfaction or burnout. During the study period many service changes occurred, most having a negative impact through increased pressure on staffing, patient mix and management so it is perhaps unsurprising that we found no benefits or reduction in staff skill.Declaration of interestNone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emese Csipke
- Doctor, Senior Research Fellow,Division of Psychiatry,University College London,UK
| | - Til Wykes
- Professor Dame,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK
| | - Stephen Nash
- Statistician,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,UK
| | - Paul Williams
- Statistician,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,Kings College London,UK
| | - Leo Koeser
- Research Assistant,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,Kings College London,UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- Professor of Health Economics,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,UK
| | - Diana Rose
- Professor of User-Led Research,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,UK
| | - Tom Craig
- Professor of Social Psychiatry,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wykes T, Csipke E, Rose D, Craig T, McCrone P, Williams P, Koeser L, Nash S. Patient involvement in improving the evidence base on mental health inpatient care: the PERCEIVE programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar06070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the movement towards care in the community, 40% of the NHS budget on mental health care is still attributed to inpatient services. However, long before the Francis Report highlighted grave shortcomings in inpatient care, there were reports by service user groups on the poor quality of these services in mental health. The programme provides a particular focus on the inclusion of the patient’s perspective in the development and evaluation of evidence.ObjectivesTo understand how changes to inpatient care affect the perceptions of the ward by service users and staff by using stakeholder participatory methods.DesignThe programme consisted of four work packages (WPs). (1) Lasting Improvements for Acute Inpatient SEttings (LIAISE): using participatory methods we developed two new scales [Views On Therapeutic Environment (VOTE) for staff and Views On Inpatient CarE (VOICE) for service users]. (2) Client Services Receipt Inventory – Inpatient (CITRINE): working with nurses and service users we developed a health economic measure of the amount of contact service users have with staff. The self-report measure records interactions with staff as well as the number of therapeutic activities attended. (3) Delivering Opportunities for Recovery (DOORWAYS): a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial to test if training ward nurses to deliver therapeutic group activities would improve the perception of the ward by service users and staff. A total of 16 wards were progressively randomised and we compared the VOICE, VOTE and CITRINE measures before and after the intervention. A total of 1108 service users and 539 staff participated in this trial. (4) Bringing Emergency TreatmenT to Early Resolution (BETTER PATHWAYS) was an observational study comparing two service systems. The first was a ‘triage’ system in which service users were admitted to the triage ward and then either transferred to their locality wards or discharged back into the community within 7 days. The second system was routine care. We collected data from 454 service users and 284 nurses on their perceptions of the wards.Main outcome measuresThe main outcomes for the DOORWAYS and BETTER project were service user and staff perceptions of the ward (VOICE and VOTE, respectively) and the health economic measure was CITRINE. All were developed in WPs 1 and 2.ResultsWe developed reliable and valid measures of (1) the perceptions of inpatient care from the perspectives of service users and nurses (VOICE and VOTE) and (2) costs of interactions that were valued by service users (CITRINE). In the DOORWAYS project, after adjusting for legal status, we found weak evidence for benefit (standardised effect of –0.18, 95% CI 0.38 improvement to 0.01 deterioration;p = 0.062). There was only a significant benefit for involuntary patients following the staff training (N582, standardised effect of –0.35, 95% CI –0.57 to –0.12;p = 0.002; interactionp-value 0.006). VOTE scores did not change over time (standardised effect size of 0.04, 95% CI –0.09 to 0.18;p = 0.54). We found no evidence of an improvement in cost-effectiveness (estimated effect of £33, 95% CI –£91 to £146;p = 0.602), but resource allocation did change towards patient-perceived meaningful contacts by an average of £12 (95% CI –£76 to £98;p = 0·774). There were no significant differences between the triage and routine models of admission in terms of better perceptions by service users (estimated effect 0.77-point improvement in VOICE score on the triage ward;p = 0.68) or nurses (estimated effect of 1.68-point deterioration in VOTE on the triage ward;p = 0.38) or in terms of the cost of the length of care provided (£391 higher on triage;p = 0.77).Strengths and limitationsWe have developed measures using methods involving both service users and staff from mental health services. The measures were developed specifically for acute inpatient services and, therefore, cannot be assumed to be useful for other services. For instance, extensions of the measures are under construction for use in mother and baby units. The strength of the BETTER PATHWAYS and DOORWAYS projects is the large-scale data collection. However, we were testing specific services based in inner city areas and stretching to inner urban areas. It may be that different effects would be found in more rural communities or in different types of inpatient care.Future workOur database will be used to develop an understanding of the mediating and moderating factors for improving care quality.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN06545047.FundingThis project was funded by the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 6, No. 7. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Emese Csipke
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Diana Rose
- Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Craig
- Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Williams
- Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Leonardo Koeser
- Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Nash
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanchez-Balcells S, Callarisa Roca M, Rodriguez-Zunino N, Puig-Llobet M, Lluch-Canut MT, Roldan-Merino JF. Psychometric properties of instruments measuring quality and satisfaction in mental health: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74:2497-2510. [PMID: 30043479 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 05/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To identify the methodological quality of each study and analyse the psychometric properties of instruments measuring quality and satisfaction with care from the perspective of mental health patients and professionals. BACKGROUND In recent years, interest in rigorously assessing quality of care in mental health and nursing has increased. Health professionals and researchers should select the most adequate instrument based on knowledge of its measurement properties. REVIEW DESIGN A psychometric review was conducted of the instruments from the perspectives of both patients and professionals according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments panel (COSMIN). DATA SOURCES Articles published from January 2005 - September 2016 were identified in a search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. We included studies in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. REVIEW METHODS Inclusion criteria were applied to all articles validated and reviewed by a second independent reviewer. The analysis included the use of the COSMIN checklist and the Terwee quality criteria. RESULTS In the 34 studies selected, a total of 22 instruments which measure quality and satisfaction with care provided, according to patients and/or professionals, were identified. Most are instruments with sound, contemporary theoretical foundations. They vary to the extent to which they have been used in empirical studies and with respect to evaluation of their validity and reliability, although five instruments stand out as yielding good-excellent values in quality criteria. CONCLUSION The present psychometric review found that five of the instruments met valid psychometric criteria. In light of the current economic situation, future reviews should include analysis of the usefulness of instruments based on cost-effectiveness, acceptability, and educational impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Callarisa Roca
- Department of Mental Health, Sant Joan de Déu School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Montserrat Puig-Llobet
- Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal-Child Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Health Sciences Campus Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria-Teresa Lluch-Canut
- Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal-Child Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Health Sciences Campus Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan F Roldan-Merino
- Department of Mental Health, Campus Docent Sant Joan de Déu-Fundació Privada, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Nursing, Rovira i Virgili University of Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wykes T, Csipke E, Williams P, Koeser L, Nash S, Rose D, Craig T, McCrone P. Improving patient experiences of mental health inpatient care: a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Med 2018; 48:488-497. [PMID: 28726599 PMCID: PMC5757411 DOI: 10.1017/s003329171700188x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poorer patient views of mental health inpatient treatment predict both further admissions and, for those admitted involuntarily, longer admissions. As advocated in the UK Francis report, we investigated the hypothesis that improving staff training improves patients' views of ward care. METHOD Cluster randomised trial with stepped wedge design in 16 acute mental health wards randomised (using the ralloc procedure in Stata) by an independent statistician in three waves to staff training. A psychologist trained ward staff on evidence-based group interventions and then supported their introduction to each ward. The main outcome was blind self-report of perceptions of care (VOICE) before or up to 2 years after staff training between November 2008 and January 2013. RESULTS In total, 1108 inpatients took part (616 admitted involuntarily under the English Mental Health Act). On average 51.6 staff training sessions were provided per ward. Involuntary patient's perceptions of, and satisfaction with, mental health wards improved after staff training (N582, standardised effect -0·35, 95% CI -0·57 to -0·12, p = 0·002; interaction p value 0·006) but no benefit to those admitted voluntarily (N469, -0.01, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.22, p = 0.955) and no strong evidence of an overall effect (N1058, standardised effect -0.18 s.d., 95% CI -0.38 to 0.01, p = 0.062). The training costs around £10 per patient per week. Resource allocation changed towards patient perceived meaningful contacts by an average of £12 (95% CI -£76 to £98, p = 0.774). CONCLUSION Staff training improved the perceptions of the therapeutic environment in those least likely to want an inpatient admission, those formally detained. This change might enhance future engagement with all mental health services and prevent the more costly admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Wykes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, King's College London, London,
UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Trust,
London, UK
| | - E. Csipke
- Division of Psychiatry,
University College London, London,
UK
| | - P. Williams
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, Kings College London, London,
UK
| | - L. Koeser
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, Kings College London, London,
UK
| | - S. Nash
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, Keppel Street, London,
UK
| | - D. Rose
- Service User Research Enterprise, Institute of
Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,
London, UK
| | - T. Craig
- Health Services and Population Research
Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
| | - P. McCrone
- Health Economics, Health Services and Population
Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College
London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A Model to Transform Psychosis Milieu Treatment Using CBT-Informed Interventions. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
16
|
Csipke E, Williams P, Rose D, Koeser L, McCrone P, Wykes T, Craig T. Following the Francis report: investigating patient experience of mental health in-patient care. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 209:35-9. [PMID: 26989098 PMCID: PMC4929406 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.171124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Francis report highlights perceptions of care that are affected by different factors including ward structures. AIMS To assess patient and staff perceptions of psychiatric in-patient wards over time. METHOD Patient and staff perceptions of in-patient psychiatric wards were assessed over 18 months. We also investigated whether the type of ward or service structure affected these perceptions. We included triage and routine care. The goal was to include at least 50% of eligible patients and staff. RESULTS The most dramatic change was a significant deterioration in all experiences over the courseof the study. Systems of care or specific wards did not affect patient experience but staff were more dissatisfied in the triage system. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of deterioration in perceptions of the therapeutic in-patient environment that has been captured in a rigorous way. It may reflect contemporaneous experiences across the National Health Service of budget reductions and increased throughput. The ward systems we investigated did not improve patient experience and triage may have been detrimental to staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - T. Wykes
- Correspondence: Til Wykes, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Csipke E, Papoulias C, Vitoratou S, Williams P, Rose D, Wykes T. Design in mind: eliciting service user and frontline staff perspectives on psychiatric ward design through participatory methods. J Ment Health 2016; 25:114-21. [PMID: 26886239 PMCID: PMC4819846 DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1139061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2014] [Revised: 12/04/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychiatric ward design may make an important contribution to patient outcomes and well-being. However, research is hampered by an inability to assess its effects robustly. This paper reports on a study which deployed innovative methods to capture service user and staff perceptions of ward design. METHOD User generated measures of the impact of ward design were developed and tested on four acute adult wards using participatory methodology. Additionally, inpatients took photographs to illustrate their experience of the space in two wards. Data were compared across wards. RESULTS Satisfactory reliability indices emerged based on both service user and staff responses. Black and minority ethnic (BME) service users and those with a psychosis spectrum diagnosis have more positive views of the ward layout and fixtures. Staff members have more positive views than service users, while priorities of staff and service users differ. Inpatient photographs prioritise hygiene, privacy and control and address symbolic aspects of the ward environment. CONCLUSIONS Participatory and visual methodologies can provide robust tools for an evaluation of the impact of psychiatric ward design on users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Diana Rose
- Service User Research Enterprise, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London,
London,
UK
| | - Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology
- Service User Research Enterprise, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London,
London,
UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Haddock G, Davies L, Evans E, Emsley R, Gooding P, Heaney L, Jones S, Kelly J, Munro A, Peters S, Pratt D, Tarrier N, Windfuhr K, Awenat Y. Investigating the feasibility and acceptability of a cognitive behavioural suicide prevention therapy for people in acute psychiatric wards (the 'INSITE' trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:79. [PMID: 26869076 PMCID: PMC4751630 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1192-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suicide is a major cause of preventable death, and suicidal behaviour is prevalent in acute psychiatric wards. People admitted to acute psychiatric wards often experience repeated episodes of suicidal behaviour, causing great distress and heavy use of NHS services. There is little research investigating effective psychological treatments for suicidal patients in inpatient settings although previous research has found support for psychological therapies which specifically target suicidal behaviour. This paper describes the protocol of a single blind RCT to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural intervention targeting suicidality (CBSP) for suicidal people in acute psychiatric wards. METHODS/DESIGN A single blind RCT comparing treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU plus Cognitive Behavioural Suicide Prevention (CBSP) therapy (TAU + CBSP). Sixty participants (aged 18-65 years) who are suicidal, or have been within the past 3 months, will be recruited from NHS trusts in the North West of England. Our primary objective is to determine whether CBSP is feasible, acceptable and efficacious when compared to patients who receive TAU alone. Secondary aims are the impact of CBSP on suicidal thinking, behaviours, functioning, quality of life, service use and psychological factors associated with suicide. Assessments take place at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months (end of treatment). The analysis will report on the feasibility and acceptability of CBSP. Qualitative data from staff and service users will inform feasibility and acceptability data. DISCUSSION Psychiatric inpatients are a high-risk group and the use of psychological therapies in these settings is rare and requires evaluation. This study is essential to investigate the unique contextual challenges involved in delivering psychological therapy to suicidal inpatients and to identify any necessary modifications required within inpatient settings. The findings will inform a larger, definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION 15 March 2012, PB-PG-1111-26026, NIHR ISRCTN17890126 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Haddock
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Linda Davies
- Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester University, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Emma Evans
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
- Manchester Mental Health and Social Care NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Richard Emsley
- Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester University, 1.304 Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Patricia Gooding
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Coupland Building 1, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Lisa Heaney
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Sarah Jones
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - James Kelly
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Early Intervention Service, Accrington, UK.
| | - Ailsa Munro
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Sarah Peters
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Daniel Pratt
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Nicholas Tarrier
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Kirsten Windfuhr
- National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Manchester University, 2nd Floor, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Yvonne Awenat
- School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Polit DF. Assessing measurement in health: Beyond reliability and validity. Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52:1746-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Revised: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 07/03/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
20
|
Abstract
Background. Acute psychiatric provision in the UK today as well as globally has many critics including service users and nurses. Method. Four focus groups, each meeting twice, were held separately for service users and nurses. The analysis was not purely inductive but driven by concerns with the social position of marginalised groups - both patients and staff. Results. The main themes were nurse/patient interaction and coercion. Service users and nurses conceptualised these differently. Service users found nurses inaccessible and uncaring, whereas nurses also felt powerless because their working life was dominated by administration. Nurses saw coercive situations as a reasonable response to factors 'internal' to the patient whereas for service users they were driven to extreme behaviour by the environment of the ward and coercive interventions were unnecessary and heavy handed. Conclusion. This study sheds new light on living and working in acute mental health settings today by comparing the perceptions of service users and nurses and deploying service user and nurse researchers. The intention is to promote better practice by providing a window on the perceptions of both groups.
Collapse
|
21
|
Effects of a recovery-oriented cognitive therapy training program on inpatient staff attitudes and incidents of seclusion and restraint. Community Ment Health J 2014; 50:415-21. [PMID: 24337473 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-013-9675-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2012] [Accepted: 12/03/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the feasibility of implementing a recovery-oriented cognitive therapy (CT-R) milieu training program in an urban acute psychiatric inpatient unit. Over a 1-month period, 29 staff members learned short-term CT-R strategies and techniques in an 8-h workshop. Trainees' perceptions of CT-R, beliefs about the therapeutic milieu, and attitudes about working with individuals with psychosis were evaluated both before the workshop and 6 months after the workshop had been completed. Incidents of seclusion and restraint on the unit were also tallied prior to and after the training. Results indicate that staff perceptions of CT-R and their beliefs about the therapeutic environment significantly improved, whereas staff attitudes towards individuals with psychosis remained the same. Incidents of seclusion and restraint also decreased after the training. These findings provide evidence that CT-R training is feasible and can improve the therapeutic milieu of an acute psychiatric inpatient unit.
Collapse
|
22
|
Laker C, Callard F, Flach C, Williams P, Sayer J, Wykes T. The challenge of change in acute mental health services: measuring staff perceptions of barriers to change and their relationship to job status and satisfaction using a new measure (VOCALISE). Implement Sci 2014; 9:23. [PMID: 24555496 PMCID: PMC4016533 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2013] [Accepted: 01/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health services are subject to frequent changes, yet there has been insufficient research to address how staff working within these services perceive the climate for implementation. Staff perceptions, particularly of barriers to change, may affect successful implementation and the resultant quality of care. This study measures staff perceptions of barriers to change in acute mental healthcare. We identify whether occupational status and job satisfaction are related to these perceptions, as this might indicate a target for intervention that could aid successful implementation. As there were no available instruments capturing staff perceptions of barriers to change, we created a new measure (VOCALISE) to assess this construct. Methods All nursing staff from acute in-patient settings in one large London mental health trust were eligible. Using a participatory method, a nurse researcher interviewed 32 staff to explore perceptions of barriers to change. This generated a measure through thematic analyses and staff feedback (N = 6). Psychometric testing was undertaken according to standard guidelines for measure development (N = 40, 42, 275). Random effects models were used to explore the associations between VOCALISE, occupational status, and job satisfaction (N = 125). Results VOCALISE was easy to understand and complete, and showed acceptable reliability and validity. The factor analysis revealed three underlying constructs: ‘confidence,’ ‘de-motivation’ and ‘powerlessness.’ Staff with negative perceptions of barriers to change held more junior positions, and had poorer job satisfaction. Qualitatively, nursing assistants expressed a greater sense of organisational unfairness in response to change. Conclusions VOCALISE can be used to explore staff perceptions of implementation climate and to assess how staff attitudes shape the successful outcomes of planned changes. Negative perceptions were linked with poor job satisfaction and to those occupying more junior roles, indicating a negative climate for implementation in those groups. Staff from these groups may therefore need special attention prior to implementing changes in mental health settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Laker
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, PO77, Room 2,11, London Henry Wellcome Building, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Norman
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|