Skill mix, roles and remuneration in the primary care workforce: who are the healthcare professionals in the primary care teams across the world?

The Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Practice Nurses in the Provision of Medication Abortion: A Cross-Sectional Survey

AIM

To examine practice nurse knowledge, attitudes, and practices about medication abortion in Australia.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

A national online survey was conducted from July to December 2021. Nurses working in general practice were recruited using convenience sampling. Data collected included demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices in abortion care. Analyses used included descriptive statistics and Poisson regression.

RESULTS

From 489 responses, knowledge about medication abortion, its provision, and efficacy was low. Although many respondents felt it was acceptable to assist in medication abortion, few indicated involvement. Those with advanced qualifications had greater perceived knowledge of abortion counselling. Respondent involvement in medication abortion was more likely if they had worked in general practice for a long time, their primary place of work was outside of general practice, or had advanced nursing qualifications.

CONCLUSIONS

Given their role in the community, there is an opportunity to better utilise practice nurses for abortion care. Incorporation of abortion into the nursing curriculum and routine practice, including supportive funding mechanisms for care, is needed.

IMPLICATIONS

Low knowledge and a lack of practice nurses providing abortion services adversely impact patient access.

IMPACT

Practice nurse provision of medication abortion has not yet been optimised. While practice nurses reported acceptability to provide abortion care, this could be enhanced with funding, education, and service normalisation. These results will inform policy makers, educators, patients, general practices, and nurses to support patient access to abortion care. Incorporating abortion care into nursing curriculum and practice will support women's access to these services.

REPORTING METHOD

CHERRIES guideline.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Professional groups, family planning organisations, industry, and government grant partners supported the study's recruitment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12622000655741.

Interventions to improve referrals from primary care to outpatient specialist services for chronic conditions: a systematic review and framework synthesis update

BACKGROUND

Prior systematic reviews highlight that accessing specialist healthcare to treat chronic conditions can be obstructed by variations in referral rates, inappropriate referrals, and poor communication. Structured referral proformas, peer feedback, and educational interventions involving specialists have been identified as successful strategies for improving referral rates and appropriateness. However, the success of such interventions is often dependent on specific clinical contexts, and little is known about the practicalities of implementation. Additionally, with advancements in healthcare delivery, such as e-referral systems, there is a need to explore new interventions and how they address barriers to referral.

METHODS

This systematic review evaluated the updated evidence exploring interventions aiming to improve rates and/or appropriateness of referral from primary care to specialist services in patients with chronic conditions.Five academic databases were searched (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, British Nursing Index, and Public Health Database), and studies published in English between 2013 and 2023 were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute's appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of studies, and a narrative synthesis was conducted using the TiDiER framework (template for intervention description and replication).

RESULTS

Eighteen full-text publications and five abstracts were included. A behavioral theory or framework for intervention development was used in seven studies. All interventions were based on primary care, and thirteen studies evaluated a multi-component intervention. Process and system changes were most commonly used to improve referral, including electronic health systems, referral algorithms, collaborative working, and patient direct access. Interventions targeted at patients were the least common. Staff education was often used in addition to process and system changes. When used alone, referral algorithms and staff education were less effective at improving referral rates or appropriateness. Implementation barriers included time constraints, logistical issues, and patients/staff preconceived perceptions of referral necessity.

CONCLUSION

Unsurprisingly, the success of interventions aimed at improving referral practices is based on contextual circumstances, and as with previous reviews, there is no one-size-fits-all approach.Given the challenges highlighted in this review, multi-component interventions addressing referral barriers in both primary and secondary care appear to be a successful way to improve referral practices.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023480493.

Patient's Perception of Primary Health Care Provision With Respect to Access, Continuity and Coordination-InCept: An International Qualitative Perspective

Health care systems are confronted with an increasing burden of (multi-)morbidity and a shortfall of healthcare providers. Coordination and continuity of care in chronic and multi-morbid patient is especially important. As qualitative patient experience data within care processes is scarce, we aim to increase the understanding of chronically ill patient's perspectives by assessing patient experiences in different health systems while treated in primary care. Patients were recruited via GPs from Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, and the British island of Jersey. To ascertain regular healthcare utilisation, inclusion criteria were either a stroke, and/or a myocardial infarction or heart failure during the past year, and an underlying metabolic syndrome. Identical semi-structured interview-guides were used in the respective language. Transcribed interviews were analysed according to inductive-deductive qualitative content analysis. Based on 22 interviews we derived four main categories (patient centeredness, continuity, coordination, access). Overall, healthcare processes were considered positive if information flow was personal and functional. Non-physician staff seemed to create reassurance. A long-lasting doctor-patient relationship was connected to the context of trust and security. Patients were critical of a perceived lack of time, inducing insufficient counselling and information-flow. This international explorative study suggests that patients' experiences can provide important information about care provision. Patients consistently focused more on relational aspects rather than on structures or functions. This has connotations for healthcare planning; for example, by providing non-physician staff to support patients through their care pathway and to improve the cooperation between providers.

Practice Nurse Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge and Practices

AIM

To describe practice nurse long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) knowledge and practices.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

Between July and December 2021, we conducted an online survey using convenience sampling to recruit Australian nurses who work in primary care, known as practice nurses. We collected data about demographics and knowledge and practices relating to LARC. Analysis used descriptive statistics and Poisson regression.

RESULTS

From 489 eligible responses, most respondents were women and the majority worked in metropolitan practices. Most (90.4%) believed that their advice could influence women's contraceptive choices. Few inserted/removed intrauterine devices (IUDs) (11.2%) or implants (15.9%). Of those that did insert LARC, most did so one to five times in the last month (IUDs 72.2%; implants 73.6%). General practice as a primary place of work was negatively associated with implant provision. Respondents with more general practice experience (≥ 15 years) and/or higher qualifications were more likely to respond correctly to knowledge questions and provide IUDs or implants. Most (62.8%) correctly identified IUD suitability for nulliparous women.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice nurses have knowledge gaps and limited practice opportunities for LARC provision.

IMPLICATIONS

Practice nurses need supportive funding policies and ongoing education and skills development to enhance patient access to LARC and their choice of provider.

REPORTING METHOD

CHERRIES guideline.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Partner organisations assisted with the study's recruitment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12622000655741.

Determining skill mix and optimal multidisciplinary team composition: A scoping review

Holistic care models aligned to population care needs are needed to help leaders shed pre-existing mindsets when determining skill mix and Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) composition. Using a PRISMA flowchart, a narrow eligibility criterion, and a research question, this scoping review resulted in 9 frameworks/models published between January 2000 and September 2023. Analysis showed common methodological elements such as a population needs-based approach, a systematic process, engagement, three or more professions reporting task or competency level analysis, change advocacy, and reliance on population and workforce supply data. Key system enablers were sponsorship, access to population needs-based and workforce supply data, a learning management system for MDT development, and health human resource policies and governance to drive health system redesign to distribute an equitable workforce. This scoping review offers health leaders and policy-makers options and next-step considerations to inspire fresh thinking for making evidence-informed decisions about skill mix and MDT composition.

Assessing the Landscape of Quality Care Nursing Metrics in General Practice Settings: A Scoping Review

AIM

To synthesise current evidence on the development and implementation of quality care metrics for nurses working in general practice.

DESIGN

A Scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

METHOD

Articles included peer-reviewed primary research, published in English between 1989 and 2024, reporting on the development, implementation and evaluation of quality care nursing metrics in general practice settings. EndNote was used for citation management, while Covidence facilitated screening and data extraction by four reviewers. The Donabedian model of quality care assessment (2005) and the WHO tool for primary care nurse competencies (2020) were used to synthesise the findings.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was conducted between June 2022 and June 2024. The search strategy was developed using Population, Concept and Context criteria, with keywords including 'Nurse', 'General Practice', 'Metric' and 'Indicator.'

RESULTS

Eleven studies conducted between 2005 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Five studies focused on quality care indicators or measures, and six examined nurse competencies or standards of care.

CONCLUSION

Quality care metrics are underutilised in general practice. There is ambiguity in metric terminology and nursing roles, education and primary care systems. Quality care metrics must align with nursing values, with digital technology and leadership as core enablers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Adoption of nursing metrics in general practice provides insights into nursing contributions to patient care. Standardising the definitions of nursing care metrics will enable valid and reliable comparisons.

IMPACT

Quality care nursing metrics will enable the nurse's role to be manifested in general practice settings in relation to patient outcomes.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA reporting guidelines have been adhered to. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: Understanding of the role of the nurse in general practice will support improved quality, safety, policy and governance in general practice settings.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Resource-Oriented Case Management to Implement Recommendations for Patients With Chronic Pain and Frequent Use of Analgesics in General Practices (Project RELIEF): Protocol for a Single-Arm Exploratory Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is a frequent reason for counseling in general practice. Current German guidelines emphasize its biopsychosocial etiology and the importance of self-care and nonpharmacological treatment strategies such as education, physical and social activity, and psychological approaches. Comprehensive assessments are necessary to individualize treatment maximally and monitor appropriate use of pain medication. General practitioners face many challenges in implementing holistic pain management, which considers biological, psychological, and social aspects. In project RELIEF (resource-oriented case management to implement recommendations for patients with chronic pain and frequent use of analgesics in general practices), a case management program was developed to facilitate implementation of guideline recommendations on pain management regarding medical assessment and monitoring, patient and practice team education, promotion of self-care strategies, and rational pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the feasibility of the intervention and study procedures before applying them in a larger cluster randomized controlled trial. Our secondary objective is to estimate potential effects of the complex intervention.

METHODS

A single-arm trial with general practices and patients with CNCP and analgesics use will be conducted, accompanied by a mixed methods process evaluation. The intervention comprises 5 components, including software-supported medical pain history, 3 scheduled structured appointments, e-learning on CNCP for general practitioners and medical assistants, educational material for patients, toolbox with information on (regional) resources for patients and practice teams. Participating practices will be located in the federal state of Baden-Württemberg, Germany, and will recruit eligible patients (adults with CNCP for more than 3 months, with at least moderate pain-related disability, permanent or on-demand use of analgesics or co-analgesics in the previous 4 weeks, and practice team assessed ability to participate actively in the trial). A questionnaire given to the first 150 adult patients entering the practice in February 2025 will help screen eligible patients. The primary objective will be measured by a set of predefined indicators. The key secondary outcome is pain-related disability measured by the Pain Disability Index German version. All participants will be asked to participate in the process evaluation. Outcome evaluation data will be gathered by paper-based and digitally provided questionnaires to be completed by participants. Process evaluation data will be gathered in surveys and a qualitative study. Descriptive analyses will be performed.

RESULTS

Recruitment occurred between October and December 2024. Targeted sample size was 6 practices and 50 patients. The intervention period will be February-June 2025. It is expected that eligible patients will benefit from the intervention and that improved medication management and intensified use of nonpharmacological treatment strategies will reduce pain-related disabilities and other patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will provide valuable information regarding feasibility and potential effects before testing the intervention in a confirmatory cluster randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00034831; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034831.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/66335.

General practice utilisation by Australian cancer patients in the last year of life

OBJECTIVES

General practice plays a key role in end-of-life care, yet the extent of this remains largely unknown due to a lack of detailed clinical data. This study aims to describe the care provided by General Practitioners (GPs) for people with cancer in their last year of life.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using linked routine primary care and death certificate data in Victoria, Australia. Patients were included who died from cancer between 2008 and 2017.

RESULTS

In total 7025 cancer patients were included, mean age of 74.8 yrs. 95% of patients visited their GP in the last 6 months of life, with a median of 11 general practice contacts in this period. 72% of patients visited their GP in the second-last month prior to death, and 74% in the last month of life. The majority of patients (58%) were prescribed opioids, 19% anticipatory medications, 24% received a home visit, and a small proportion had imaging (6%) in the last month and pathology (6%) in the last fortnight. Patients in regional areas had more contact with general practices in the last year of life compared to metropolitan patients (median metropolitan = 16, inner regional = 25, and outer regional = 23, P < .001). The use of GP services did not differ by cancer type.

CONCLUSIONS

GP's play a central role in end-of-life care provision for cancer patients, which intensifies in the last months of life. There is room for improvement, with a proportion having little or no engagement, and low rates of home visits and anticipatory medication prescribing.

Patients' experience of integrated nursing care in general practices in Switzerland: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

In many high-income countries, nurses, including registered nurses (RNs), play a key role in primary care (PC), particularly in general practice. Their involvement enhances patients' experiences, especially in terms of accessibility and comprehensiveness of care provided. To reinforce the provision of care and enhance patients' experience in family medicine, RNs were integrated into eight private general practices in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland, creating interprofessional teams. This study assessed patients' experiences with new nursing activities in general practices.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used to assess patients' experiences. Quantitative data were collected through a patient experience survey conducted before and after nursing follow-up, with descriptive and bivariate analyses performed. Qualitative data were obtained from interviews with ten patients.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients completed the questionnaire before and after nursing follow-up. Descriptive analyses showed that several dimensions of patients' experience improved with new nursing follow-up. Bivariate analyses revealed significant improvements in several areas, including unmet healthcare needs, accessibility to nursing care, preventive care, and information provided. Furthermore, patients reported positive changes in their health and lifestyle due to preventive care. Qualitative data supported these results, highlighting the importance of nurses' accessibility and availability and the holistic nursing care provided.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the potential of nurse-led case management to address gaps in PC delivery, particularly in managing chronic diseases. The integration of nurses into general practice settings improved the provision of preventive care, enhanced patient education, and increased accessibility to care.

The impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: results from a rapid scoping review

BACKGROUND

High-performing primary care relies on effective interprofessional teams and provider payment arrangements. This study aims to examine the impact of provider remuneration mechanisms and intrinsic and extrinsic incentives in team-based primary care.

METHODS

This rapid scoping review assessed various provider payment models and incentives in team-based primary care. Statistical tests were not applicable in this review.

RESULTS

Fee-for-service models hindered team collaboration, while salaried and quality-based compensation models enhanced collaboration. Extrinsic incentives, such as pay-for-performance programs for physicians, showed mixed impacts on outcomes. Strong organizational cultures and leadership, resources, team meetings, training, clear protocols, and professional development opportunities facilitated teamwork. Intrinsic incentives like autonomy, mastery, and social purpose improved team performance and satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the importance of a holistic approach to designing interprofessional primary care teams. It highlights the need for implementing non-fee-for-service provider payment models and team-based pay-for-performance incentives. Investments in teams should include health human resources and leadership, training, guidelines, and professional development opportunities. Implementing a performance measurement framework for teams and regular public reporting can foster mastery. Continuous research and evaluation are crucial to optimizing teamwork and healthcare delivery in primary care settings.

A nurse-led model of care to improve access to contraception and abortion in rural general practice: Co-design with consumers and providers

AIM

To describe key features of a co-designed nurse-led model of care intended to improve access to early medication abortion and long-acting reversible contraception in rural Australian general practice.

DESIGN

Co-design methodology informed by the Experience-Based Co-Design Framework.

METHODS

Consumers, nurses, physicians and key women's health stakeholders participated in a co-design workshop focused on the patient journey in seeking contraception or abortion care. Data generated at the workshop were analysed using Braun and Clarkes' six-step process for thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-two participants took part in the co-design workshop. Key recommendations regarding setting up the model included: raising awareness of the early medication abortion and contraceptive implant services, providing flexible booking options, ensuring appointment availability, providing training for reception staff and fostering good relationships with relevant local services. Recommendations for implementing the model were also identified, including the provision of accessible information, patient-approved communication processes that ensure privacy and safety, establishing roles and responsibilities, supporting consumer autonomy and having clear pathways for referrals and complications.

CONCLUSION

Our approach to experience-based co-design ensured that consumer experiences, values and priorities, together with practitioner insights, were central to the development of a nurse-led model of care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

The co-designed nurse-led model of care for contraception and medication abortion is one strategy to increase access to these essential reproductive health services, particularly in rural areas, while providing an opportunity for nurses to work to their full scope of practice.

IMPACT

Nurse-led care has gained global recognition as an effective strategy to promote equitable access to sexual and reproductive healthcare. Still, nurse-led contraception and abortion have yet to be implemented andevaluated in Australian general practice. This study will inform the model of care to be implemented and evaluated as part of the ORIENT trial to be completed in 2025.

REPORTING METHOD

Reported in line with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Two consumer representatives contributed to the development of the co-design methodology as members of the ORIENT Intervention Advisory Group Governance Committee.

Perspectives of general practitioners and practice nurses on nurse-led patient consultations and dose changes of permanent medications-results of a focus group study

BACKGROUND

Shifting tasks from General practitioners (GPs) to practice nurses (PNs) could help address the shortage of GPs in Europe. Internationally, PN-led care (PNLC) is feasible and offers similar health outcomes to usual care. However, PN-led consultations (PN-cons) or as PN-led dosage changes for permanent medication (PN-DCPM) are uncommon in German general practice offices (GPO).

OBJECTIVE

To explore GPs' and PNs' views on the feasibility and acceptability of PN-cons and PN-DCPM in GPOs.

METHODS

In this exploratory, qualitative online focus group study, we recruited GPs, GP trainees, PNs and specialized PNs (APN) currently working in German GPO using a qualitative sampling plan. We used a semi-structured self-developed interview guide. Separate focus groups (FGs) were performed for each profession, with audio and video recordings, and the transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Two FGs comprising 15 GPs and three FGs with 26 PNs revealed four major themes: (i) Attitudes towards PN-cons and PN-DCPM, revealing that participants were generally open towards a PN-cons, but were more reserved towards PN-DCPM. (ii) Acceptable reasons for encounters for PN-cons, e.g. diabetes or hypertension, and acceptable medications for PN-DCPM, e.g. antidiabetics, antihypertensive drugs. (iii) Conditions mentioned for implementing PN-led care were e.g. adequate qualification and supervision concepts. (iv) Perceived chances were e.g. time savings and increased quality of care and perceived risks were e.g. fear of treatment errors.

CONCLUSION

Participants showed openness towards PN-cons and were more reserved towards PN-DCPM in German GPO. Further quantitative studies should assess how acceptance and rejection of PN-led care are distributed among patients, GPs, and PNs.

Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme uptake, patient satisfaction, and QOF achievement: an ecological study from 2020-2023

BACKGROUND

The Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced by NHS England in 2019 alongside primary care networks (PCNs), with the aims of increasing the workforce and improving patient outcomes.

AIM

To describe the uptake of direct patient care (DPC)-ARRS roles and its impact on patients' experiences.

DESIGN AND SETTING

An ecological study using 2020-2023 PCN and practice workforce data, registered patient characteristics, the General Practice Patient Survey, and the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).

METHOD

Descriptive statistics with associations were examined using quantile and linear regression.

RESULTS

By March 2023, 17 588 full-time equivalent (FTE) DPC-ARRS roles were commissioned by 1223 PCNs. PCNs with fewer constituent practices had more DPC-ARRS roles per population (P<0.001), as did PCNs with more FTE GPs per population (P = 0.005). DPC-ARRS commissioning did not vary with age, sex, or deprivation characteristics of practice populations. DPC-ARRS roles were associated with small increases in patient satisfaction (0.8 percentage points increase in patients satisfied per one DPC-ARRS FTE) and perceptions of access (0.7 percentage points increase in patients reporting 'good' experience of making an appointment per one DPC-ARRS FTE), but not with overall QOF achievement.

CONCLUSION

The commissioning of DPC-ARRS roles was associated with small increases in patient satisfaction and perceptions of access, but not with QOF achievement. DPC-ARRS roles were employed in areas with more GPs rather than compensating for a shortage of doctors. Single-practice PCNs commissioned more roles per registered population, which may be advantageous to single-practice PCNs. Further evaluation of the scheme is warranted.

Nurse practitioner and physician end-of-life home visits and end-of-life outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Physicians and nurse practitioners (NPs) play critical roles in supporting palliative and end-of-life care in the community. We examined healthcare outcomes among patients who received home visits from physicians and NPs in the 90 days before death.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked data of adult home care users in Ontario, Canada, who died between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Healthcare outcomes included medications for pain and symptom management, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalisations and a community-based death. We compared the characteristics of and outcomes in decedents who received a home visit from an NP, physician and both to those who did not receive a home visit.

RESULTS

Half (56.9%) of adult decedents in Ontario did not receive a home visit from a provider in the last 90 days of life; 34.5% received at least one visit from a physician, 3.8% from an NP and 4.9% from both. Compared with those without any visits, having at least one home visit reduced the odds of hospitalisation and ED visits, and increased the odds of receiving medications for pain and symptom management and achieving a community-based death. Observed effects were larger in patients who received at least one visit from both.

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond home care, receiving home visits from primary care providers near the end of life may be associated with better outcomes that are aligned with patients' preferences-emphasising the importance of NPs and physicians' role in supporting people near the end of life.

Task shifting to improve practice efficiency: A survey among general practitioners in non-urban Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany

BACKGROUND

Germany is challenged by an increasing shortage in general practice services, especially in non-urban areas. Task shifting from general practitioners (GPs) to other health professionals may improve practice efficiency to address this mismatch.

OBJECTIVES

Exploring GPs' motives and beliefs towards task shifting in non-urban Germany and identifying potential factors influencing these.

METHODS

The cross-sectional survey was disseminated by mail in three waves between July 2021 and August 2022 among all GPs in non-urban Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. It included items on demographics and practice characteristics as well as 15 Likert-scale items addressing motives and beliefs towards task shifting, based on the Theoretical Domain Framework. Likert-scale items were analysed descriptively, influencing factors on motives and beliefs were identified using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

Response rate was 24.2% (281/1162), with respondents comparable in age and gender to all GPs in Baden-Wuerttemberg. GPs' motives and beliefs towards task shifting are positive overall. The majority expects task shifting to reduce their workload (87.9%) and increase practice efficiency (74.7%). They are open to shift additional tasks to other professionals (69.1%), even in the currently prohibited form of substitution (51.2%). Motives and beliefs were significantly more positive among younger GPs and those participating in the GP-centred care programme.

CONCLUSION

This study describes GPs' motives and beliefs towards task shifting in non-urban Germany. Identifying younger GPs and those participating in the GP-centred care programme as particularly endorsing may help design future interventions aiming to improve efficiency in general practice in non-urban Germany.

Retaining Healing Hands: A Transnational Study on Job Retention Interventions for the Healthcare Workforce

Healthcare organizations worldwide face challenges in retaining their healthcare workforce, with individual and organizational factors influencing their intentions to leave. This study conducted eight online co-creation workshops and four Delphi sessions to gain qualitative and in-depth insights into job retention interventions, involving healthcare workers, hospital managers, and policymakers. A thematic analysis was conducted, resulting in multiple interventions that were clustered in four pre-defined themes: professional and personal support, education, financial incentives, and regulatory measures. Professional and personal support interventions included regular interprofessional team meetings, leadership training programs, self-scheduling and sabbaticals, support for administrative and non-clinical work, and the provision of psychological counselling. Educational interventions encompassed facilitating development opportunities, periodic evaluations, onboarding, mentorship programs, and peer support groups. Financial incentives included the provision of competitive salaries, adequate infrastructure, extra benefits, transport possibilities, and permanent employment contracts. Regulatory measures addressed the need for complementary legislation across various levels, fixed healthcare worker-to-patient ratio, and instruments to monitor workload. To optimize retention strategies, healthcare organizations should tailor these interventions to address the unique factors influencing their workforce's intentions to leave within their specific context. The study concludes that combining personal and professional support, educational opportunities, financial incentives, and regulatory measures is necessary because there is no one-size-fits-all solution.

Task shifting in Dutch nursing practice: A repeated cross-sectional analysis of nurses' experiences

AIM

This study aims firstly to identify shifts in the execution of medical tasks by nurses in the past decade. Secondly, it aims to explore nurses' perspectives on task shifting: how they think task shifting affects the quality of care, the attractiveness of nursing practice and their collaboration with physicians.

DESIGN

A quantitative repeated cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A nationwide survey was conducted among Dutch registered nurses (RNs) working in hospitals and home care, first in 2012 and again in 2022, with sample sizes of 359 and 362, respectively. Analyses were based on descriptive statistics and logistic and linear regressions.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2022, there was a significant increase in the execution of only one medical task by nurses, namely prescribing over-the-counter medication. The majority reported in both years that task shifting has positive impact on their professional autonomy and the attractiveness of nursing practice. However, most nurses also reported that task shifting increased their workload (72.7% in 2022) could lead to conflicts in care teams (20.9% in 2022 compared to 14.7% in 2012) and may cause physicians to feel threatened (32.8% in 2022 and 29.9% in 2012). There were no significant changes in nurses' perception of the impact of task shifting on quality of care, the attractiveness of nursing practice and the nurse-physician relationship.

CONCLUSION

There was an increase in the execution of prescribing over-the-counter-medication by nurses between 2012 and 2022. However, both in 2012 and in 2022, as the majority of nurses reported that task shifting increased their workload, there is reason to worry about this negative consequence of task shifting, e.g. with regard to labour market issues. Further research, also among the medical profession, is needed to better understand and address the implications of task shifting for the nursing profession.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION

Implications for the nursing profession include potential scope expansion with complex tasks, attracting more individuals to nursing careers, although an eye must also be kept on what that means for the workload of nurses and the relationship with physicians.

IMPACT

Nurse prescribing medicines was more executed in 2022 compared to 2012. Nurses had a predominantly positive perspective on task shifting, but still felt it can cause conflicts in care teams, high workload and physicians feeling threatened. These results can help during implementation of task shifting and in monitoring the perceived effects of task shifting among nurses.

REPORTING METHOD

This study followed the STROBE reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public Contribution. This study focussed on the task shifting (perspectives) of nurses.

Clinician Staffing and Quality of Care in US Health Centers

Importance

Health centers are vital primary care safety nets for underserved populations, but optimal clinician staffing associated with quality care is unclear. Understanding the association of clinician staffing patterns with quality of care may inform care delivery, scope-of-practice policy, and resource allocation.

Objective

To describe the association of clinician staffing models and ratios with quality-of-care metrics in health centers.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study of US health centers used data from the 2022 Health Resources and Services Administration Uniform Data System (UDS).

Exposure

Clinician staffing ratios, expressed as the fraction of full-time equivalents (FTEs) per 1000 visits of physicians, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), and physician associates (PAs) to total clinician FTEs at each health center.

Main outcomes and measures

Percentage of eligible patients receiving the corresponding service or outcome for 14 individual clinical quality metrics collected by the UDS, including infant immunizations; screening for cancer, depression, tobacco use, hypertension, HIV, and glycated hemoglobin levels; weight and body mass index (BMI) assessment; and appropriate statin, aspirin, and/or antiplatelet therapy.

Results

This analysis of 791 health centers serving 16 114 842 patients (56.6% female) identified 5 clinician staffing models: balanced (similar FTEs of physicians, APRNs, and PAs; 152 [19.2%] of health centers), higher FTEs of APRNs than physicians (174 [22.0%]), higher FTEs of physicians than APRNs (160 [20.2%]), approximately equal FTEs of physicians and APRNs (263 [33.2%]), and large scale (42 [5.3%]). Adjusted linear models showed positive associations between physician FTEs per 1000 visits and cervical (β, 14.9; 95% CI, 3.1-26.7), breast (β, 15.7; 95% CI, 3.2-28.1), and colorectal (β, 18.3; 95% CI, 6.0-30.6) cancer screening. Generalized additive models showed nonlinear positive associations beginning at a physician FTE ratio of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.02-6.22) for infant vaccinations, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.05-2.21) for cervical cancer screening, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.02-1.67) for breast cancer screening, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.00-5.76) for HIV testing, and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.18-19.96) for depression in remission; APRN FTE ratio of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.17-7.46) for adult BMI assessment; and PA FTE ratio of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-3.88) for infant vaccinations. Staffing models were not associated with 7 of the 14 metrics analyzed.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of health centers, physician FTE ratio was associated with higher performance in cancer screening, infant vaccinations, and HIV testing; APRN FTE ratio was associated with higher performance in preventative health assessments; and PA FTE ratio was associated with higher performance in infant vaccination. These findings suggest that targeted staffing strategies may be associated with quality of care in certain domains and that tailored approaches to health center staffing based on community-specific needs are warranted.

Key components of rehabilitation programmes for adults with complex fractures following traumatic injury: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Complex fractures are severe injuries that cause considerable disability, particularly in the working population. Effective rehabilitation is essential to achieve good outcomes, however, it is unclear what the best rehabilitation strategy is for adults with complex fractures, after their discharge from hospital. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and map the breadth of evidence available on this topic.

METHODS

A systematic search was completed on 24th July 2023 using a combination of subject and specialist databases. In addition, a secondary search assessed unpublished literature from trial registries. A citation search was completed on the selected studies. The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to extract consistent data on the interventions reported in the studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews was followed.

RESULTS

19,253 studies were identified from the search strategy of which 25 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most interventions were exercise-based and delivered by physiotherapists. Some studies compared manual therapy treatments to other forms of physiotherapy or a placebo, whilst others investigated psychosocial interventions, such as cognitive behavioural therapy, in comparison to usual care. Two studies took a multidisciplinary team approach, incorporating components such as exercise, functional activities and self-management strategies.

DISCUSSION

The studies included were heterogenous in terms of population (fracture type, location and complexity), intervention content and therapeutic aims. However, commonalities were found with most interventions or comparators including range of movement, strengthening and task specific exercises; functional tasks; gait and balance training; and advice on return to activities as components. Value was attributed to components such as, a coordinated team approach, person-centred rehabilitation, supervised exercise and psychosocial support.

CONCLUSION

There is a broad and varied approach to the rehabilitation of complex fractures. The studies differed in population and approach, with a wide range of injuries, interventions and modes of delivery reported. Fidelity was poorly described, with only a third of studies reporting adherence or acceptability. There was inconclusive evidence to inform clinical practice and further research is advised. Qualitative, expert consensus, and coproduction approaches are recommended methods to develop complex interventions and best practice guidance.

Exploring the acceptability, barriers, and facilitators to psychosis screening in the integrated behavioral health primary care setting: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

A longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is associated with poorer treatment outcomes. Screening for psychosis spectrum disorders in the primary care setting could help support the earlier detection and treatment of individuals in need. However, the acceptability of screening for psychosis in this setting as part of routine care is currently unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative interview study with providers and service users who participated in an early psychosis screening program conducted in an integrated behavioral health primary care (IBH-PC) setting. Interviews were recruited from one of eight WellSpace Federally Qualified Health Center IBH-PC clinics in the Sacramento, CA area. Transcripts of the recorded interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 12 providers and eight service users participated in the interviews. Most service user and provider participants were supportive of psychosis screening in an IBH-PC setting, but not as part of the general practitioner consultation due to the brief, non-behavioral health nature of many of the appointments, and the expected low prevalence of psychosis in this population. The support of leadership, adequate training and support, staff turnover, and organizational changes were all seen to impact the successful implementation of the program. Different barriers and facilitators were considered important at each stage of the process from introducing the screening procedures to service users; to determining when, where, and how to screen; and how to effectively manage the referral and post-referral stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the additional challenges of screening in an IBH-PC setting relative to secondary mental health services, the process was considered acceptable and feasible to providers and service users. Services that plan to conduct psychosis screening in their clinics need to consider the challenges and their potential solutions to implementation at each stage of the screening process.

Nurse and midwife involvement in task-sharing and telehealth service delivery models in primary care: A scoping review

AIM

To synthesise and map current evidence on nurse and midwife involvement in task-sharing service delivery, including both face-to-face and telehealth models, in primary care.

DESIGN

This scoping review was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Methodology for Scoping Reviews.

DATA SOURCE/REVIEW METHODS

Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 16 January 2024, and articles were screened for inclusion in Covidence by three authors. Findings were mapped according to the research questions and review outcomes such as characteristics of models, health and economic outcomes, and the feasibility and acceptability of nurse-led models.

RESULTS

One hundred peer-reviewed articles (as 99 studies) were deemed eligible for inclusion. Task-sharing models existed for a range of conditions, particularly diabetes and hypertension. Nurse-led models allowed nurses to work to the extent of their practice scope, were acceptable to patients and providers, and improved health outcomes. Models can be cost-effective, and increase system efficiencies with supportive training, clinical set-up and regulatory systems. Some limitations to telehealth models are described, including technological issues, time burden and concerns around accessibility for patients with lower technological literacy.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-led models can improve health, economic and service delivery outcomes in primary care and are acceptable to patients and providers. Appropriate training, funding and regulatory systems are essential for task-sharing models with nurses to be feasible and effective.

IMPACT

Nurse-led models are one strategy to improve health equity and access; however, there is a scarcity of literature on what these models look like and how they work in the primary care setting. Evidence suggests these models can also improve health outcomes, are perceived to be feasible and acceptable, and can be cost-effective. Increased utilisation of nurse-led models should be considered to address health system challenges and improve access to essential primary healthcare services globally.

REPORTING METHOD

This review is reported against the PRISMA-ScR criteria.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The study protocol is published in BJGP Open (Moulton et al., 2022).

Unlocking potential: a qualitative exploration guiding the implementation and evaluation of professional role substitution models in healthcare

BACKGROUND

As role substitution models gain prominence in healthcare, understanding the factors shaping their effectiveness is paramount. This study aimed to investigate factors that impact the implementation and performance evaluation of professional role substitution models in healthcare, with a focus on understanding the variables that determine their success or failure in adoption, execution, continuity, and outcomes.

METHODS

The exploratory qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with key opinion leaders, decision makers, facilitators, recipients, and frontline implementers, who had influence and involvement in the implementation of professional role substitution models. Data analysis was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

Between November 2022 and April 2023, 39 stakeholders were interviewed. Factors influencing implementation and evaluation of allied health professional role substitution models of care aligned with the five core CFIR domains (innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, implementation process) and outcome domain incorporating implementation and innovation outcomes. The six themes identified within these CFIR domains were, respectively; i) Examining the dynamics of innovation catalysts, evidence, advantages, and disadvantages; ii) Navigating the complex landscape of external factors that influence implementation and evaluation; iii) Impact of internal structural, political, and cultural contexts; iv) The roles and contributions of individuals in the process; v) Essential phases and strategies for effective implementation; and vi) The assessment of outcomes derived from allied health professional role substitution models.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the complex interplay of contextual and individual factors that influence the implementation and performance evaluation of professional role substitution models. It emphasises the need for collaboration among diverse stakeholders to navigate the challenges and leverage the opportunities presented by expanded healthcare roles. Understanding these multifaceted factors can contribute to the development of an empowered workforce and a healthcare system that is more efficient, effective, safe, and sustainable, ultimately benefiting patients.

The advancement of critical care nursing as a response to the current demands

The current demand on health services requires that nurses play a key role, by adapting their competencies to different fields and complexity levels. The approach of situations presented by critically ill patients underpins the need for development of specialised competencies in specific areas such as patient safety, prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections, performance of specific techniques and interventions, autonomous medication management or the use of technology, among others. Spain relies on a specialist training programme that is unique worldwide. Training admission is managed through a contract as a "Resident Nurse Intern" (EIR, Enfermera Interna Residente), provided by regional healthcare services. Only 6 specialities have been established and developed, in an uneven manner and with a short provision of places, annually. Given that the specialization in critical care nursing does not exist, nurses usually self-fund their postgraduate training to enhance their opportunities career development. The development of a speciality for critical care nursing is a priority. The models proposed advocate for creating nursing roles that could cover the systemic gaps through the expansion of their competencies and the introduction of procedures that fit nursing into advanced practice, which could be achieved through Advanced Accreditation Diplomas. Simultaneously, it would be convenient to analyse how and why such a dynamic discipline in some countries became stuck in anachronistic models of the Spanish healthcare system. This analysis might contribute to move forward on the development of areas of improvement in terms of service access and quality of care.

Women over 50 who use alcohol and their engagement with primary and preventative health services: a narrative review using a systematic approach

BACKGROUND

Women who are over 50 years are drinking alcohol in higher quantities and more frequently than in previous decades. Good engagement with primary care is crucial for women's physical and psychological health, particularly if they use alcohol. However, there is little known about the alcohol use of women over 50 and their use of primary care.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on six databases; CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, EMBASE and Web of Science to identify literature on primary health care engagement of women 50 years and older (50+) who use alcohol. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and full texts were independently reviewed by two researchers. A narrative review, critical appraisal and synthesis of the eligible studies produced common themes and key findings.

RESULTS

After excluding 3822 articles, 13 articles were deemed eligible for the review. For this age group (50+), findings were: 1) women who drink heavily were less likely than men to attend General Practitioners (GPs), moderate drinkers were more likely than abstainers to attend mammogram screening, 2) GPs were less likely to ask questions or discuss alcohol with women than with men, 3) GPs offered less advice on alcohol to women than to men, and 4) less women than men received alcohol screening from their GP.

DISCUSSION

While women 50+ are drinking more, their alcohol use is underreported and insufficiently provided for in primary health. As women's life expectancy increases, improved GP engagement will benefit women's health and reduce future healthcare costs.

Did the organization of primary care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic influence quality and safety? - an international survey

BACKGROUND

Changes in demographics with an older population, the illness panorama with increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases, and the shift from hospital care to home-based care place demand on primary health care, which requires multiprofessional collaboration and team-based organization of work. The COVID-19 pandemic affected health care in various ways, such as heightened infection control measures, changing work practices, and increased workload.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the association between primary care practices' organization, and quality and safety changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

Data were collected from 38 countries in a large online survey, the PRICOV-19 study. For this paper, the participating practices were categorized as "Only GPs", comprising practices with solely general practitioners (GPs) and/or GP trainees, without any other health care professionals (n = 1,544), and "Multiprofessional," comprising practices with at least one GP or GP trainee and one or more other health professionals (n = 3,936).

RESULTS

Both categories of practices improved in infection control routines when compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger proportion of the multiprofessional practices changed their routines to protect vulnerable patients. Telephone triage was used in more "Multiprofessional" practices, whereas "Only GPs" were more likely to perform video consultations as an alternative to physical visits. Both types of practices reported that the time to review new guidelines and scientific literature decreased during the pandemic. However, both had more meetings to discuss directives than before the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiprofessional teams were keener to introduce changes to the care organization to protect vulnerable patients. However, practices with only GPs were found to be more aligned with video consultations, perhaps reflecting the close patient-doctor relationship. In contrast, telephone triage was used more in multiprofessional teams.

Identifying strategies to support implementation of interprofessional primary care teams in Nova Scotia: Results of a survey and knowledge sharing event

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional primary care teams (IPCTs) work together to enhance care. Despite evidence on the benefits of IPCTs, implementation remains challenging. This research aims to 1) identify and prioritize barriers and enablers, and 2) co-develop team-level strategies to support IPCT implementation in Nova Scotia, Canada.

METHODS

Healthcare providers and staff of IPCTs were invited to complete an online survey to identify barriers and enablers, and the degree to which each item impacted the functioning of their team. Top ranked items were identified using the sum of frequency x impact for each response. A virtual knowledge sharing event was held to identify strategies to address local barriers and enablers that impact team functioning.

RESULTS

IPCT members (n = 117), with a mix of clinic roles and experience, completed the survey. The top three enablers identified were access to technological tools to support their role, standardized processes for using the technological tools, and having a team manager to coordinate collaboration. The top three barriers were limited opportunity for daily team communication, lack of conflict resolution strategies, and lack of capacity building opportunities. IPCT members, administrators, and patients attended the knowledge sharing event (n = 33). Five strategies were identified including: 1) balancing patient needs and provider scope of practice, 2) holding regular and accessible meetings, 3) supporting team development opportunities, 4) supporting professional development, and 5) supporting involvement in non-clinical activities.

INTERPRETATION

This research contextualized evidence to further understand local perspectives and experiences of barriers and enablers to the implementation of IPCTs. The knowledge exchange event identified actionable strategies that IPCTs and healthcare administrators can tailor to support teams and care for patients.

Clinical Feeding and Swallowing Evaluation for the School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist

PURPOSE

From preschool through high school, eating is part of the school day. Children with feeding and/or swallowing issues are now in our neighborhood schools, our responsibility in our care, and require adequate nutrition and hydration to participate in school and access the curriculum. The whole child is in school, including all of their medical, behavioral, social, and educational needs. This clinical focus article describes a holistic process of evaluating swallowing and feeding in the school setting for the school speech-language pathologist (SLP) leading the team supporting the child.

METHOD

This clinical focus article explores the evaluation process in the educational setting for the school SLP in identification of pediatric feeding disorders (PFDs), which can involve dysphagia. Detailed descriptions of the related U.S. educational law, PFD, assessment processes for the multiple systems relating to eating, and collaboration with an interdisciplinary team are highlighted. Using the four overlapping domains of PFD (medical, psychosocial, feeding skill-based systems and associated nutritional aspects), medical and background history gathering; integration with instrumental results; and the need to consider the complex interaction of developmental, physical, cognitive, social, behavioral, family, and cultural aspects in the evaluation are detailed.

CONCLUSIONS

School-age children require safe and adequate nutrition and hydration for learning and social participation. The SLP has a lead role in the school team in evaluating swallowing and feeding, and developing a plan for team implementation. A holistic school-based SLP clinical evaluation process is described.

Teamwork and its impact on chronic disease clinical outcomes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Teamwork positively affects staff performance and patient outcomes in chronic disease management. However, there is limited research on the impact of specific team components on clinical outcomes. This review aims to explore the impact of teamwork components on key clinical outcomes of chronic diseases in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted searching EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies included must have at least one teamwork component, conducted in primary care for selected chronic diseases, and report an impact of teamwork on clinical outcomes. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine pooled effects of intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies from 1988 to 2021 were reviewed. Shared decision-making, roles sharing, and leadership were missing in most studies. Team-based intervention showed a reduction in mean systolic blood pressure (MD = 5.88, 95% CI 3.29-8.46, P= <0.001, I2 = 95%), diastolic blood pressure (MD = 3.23, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.92, P = <0.001, I2 = 94%), and HbA1C (MD = 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.54, P = <0.001, I2 = 58%). More team components led to better SBP and DBP outcomes, while individual team components have no impact on HbA1C. Fewer studies limit analysis of cholesterol levels, hospitalizations, emergency visits and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Team-based interventions improve outcomes for chronic diseases, but more research is needed on managing cholesterol, hospitalizations, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Studies with 4-5 team components were more effective in reducing systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Heterogeneity should be considered, and additional research is needed to optimize interventions for specific patient populations.

Healthcare experiences of people living with medically unexplained symptoms: a systematic review

A diagnosis of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) is made when a person reports a complaint for which no organic disease can be detected. People with MUS commonly present to primary care services in the UK; however, there is no consensus regarding the evidence base for care. This literature review explores the experiences of these patients when they interact with health services. The following themes emerged: experience of diagnosis; expectations; communication; and healthful relationships. People with MUS report negative experiences of health care. Nurses in primary care have an opportunity to provide person-centred care to support these patients, and research could explore the potential contribution of nurses working in primary care in the UK to support them and enhance the evidence base for practice.

Experiences of an interprofessional follow-up program in primary care practice

BACKGROUND

An integrative cooperation of different healthcare professional is a key component for high quality health services. With an aging population and many with long-term conditions, more health tasks and follow-up care are being transferred to primary care and locally where people live. Interprofessional collaboration among providers of different professional designations will be of increasing importance to optimizing primary care capacity in years to come. There is a call for further exploration of models of interprofessional collaboration that might be applicable in Norwegian primary care. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of interprofessional collaboration between primary care physicians and nurses working in primary care by applying an intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, this study was designed to strengthen and gain deeper insight into interprofessional collaboration between primary care physicians and nurses in primary care settings.

METHODS

We applied Interpretive Description as a research strategy. The participants within this study were primary care physicians and nurses from four different primary care practices in the western and eastern parts of Norway. We used semi-structured telephone interviews for collecting the data between January and September 2021.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed two key features of the primary care physicians and the nurses experience with interprofessional collaboration in primary care practices. The first involved managing the influence of discrepancies in their expectations of IPC and the second involved becoming aware of the competence they developed that allowed for better complementarity consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that interprofessional collaboration in primary care practice requires that primary care physicians and nurses clarify their expectations and, in turn, determine how flexible they can become in changing their usual primary care practices. Moreover, findings reveal that nurses and primary care physicians had discrepancies in expectations of how interprofessional collaboration should be carried out in primary care practice. However, both the nurses and primary care physicians appreciated the blending of complementary competencies and skills that facilitated a more collaborative care practice. They experienced that this interprofessional collaboration represented an essential quality improvement in the primary care services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered 03/09/2019 in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04076384).

"Cooperation between physicians and physios fosters trust you know": a qualitative study exploring patients' experience with first-contact physiotherapy for low back pain in French primary care

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapists working in collaboration with family physicians in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics are now able to manage acute low back pain patients as first-contact practitioners in advanced practice roles. This includes medical act delegation such as making a medical diagnosis and prescribing medication. The aim of this study is to explore patients' experience and perceptions when attending a first-contact physiotherapist (FCP) in an advanced practice collaborative primary care model for acute low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted. Patients that consulted a FCP for acute LBP care in new collaborative model were included. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and inductive thematic analysis was performed to generate themes related to patients' experience and perceptions.

RESULTS

Ten patients were interviewed (3 women, 7 men; mean age 36.5 ± 9.63 years). All LBP participants experienced important level of pain and disability. Four overarching themes related to patients' experience with the new FCP model were formalized: 1) "Going to see a physiotherapist who specializes in painful movements, well that makes sense to me", 2) "Physiotherapist offered to give me exercises to do at home to relieve the back pain", 3) "I went there feeling confident", 4) "The physiotherapist can do more than just send you to see more appropriate people". Participants highlighted the need to receive timely and high-quality care and were receptive with being autonomously managed by a FCP. Overall, patients' experiences with FCP model of care were positive. Participants were highly confident in the FCP's ability to perform delegated medical tasks including making a medical diagnosis and prescribing oral medication such as analgesic drugs. Patients felt that a greater expansion of FCPs' scope of practice was needed to improve the model.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study can inform the implementation of FCP in countries where patients are not typically granted FCP by underlining that patients are favourable towards the advance practice model as such models support timely and high-quality care. Further research is needed to better determine the future advance practice physiotherapists' scope of practice in French primary and secondary care settings.

Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams: a narrative review of the literature using the consolidated framework for implementation research

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional primary care teams have been introduced across Canada to improve access (e.g., a regular primary care provider, timely access to care when needed) to and quality of primary care. However, the quality and speed of team implementation has not kept pace with increasing access issues. The aim of this research was to use an implementation framework to categorize and describe barriers and enablers to team implementation in primary care.

METHODS

A narrative review that prioritized systematic reviews and evidence syntheses was conducted. A search using pre-defined terms was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, and potentially relevant grey literature was identified through ad hoc Google searches and hand searching of health organization websites. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to categorize barriers and enablers into five domains: (1) Features of Team Implementation; (2) Government, Health Authorities and Health Organizations; (3) Characteristics of the Team; (4) Characteristics of Team Members; and (5) Process of Implementation.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 19 of 435 articles that met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most barriers and enablers were categorized into two domains of the CFIR: Characteristics of the Team and Government, Health Authorities, and Health Organizations. Key themes identified within the Characteristics of the Team domain were team-leadership, including designating a manager responsible for day-to-day activities and facilitating collaboration; clear governance structures, and technology supports and tools that facilitate information sharing and communication. Key themes within the Government, Health Authorities, and Health Organizations domain were professional remuneration plans, regulatory policy, and interprofessional education. Other key themes identified in the Features of Team Implementation included the importance of good data and research on the status of teams, as well as sufficient and stable funding models. Positive perspectives, flexibility, and feeling supported were identified in the Characteristics of Team Members domain. Within the Process of Implementation domain, shared leadership and human resources planning were discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams using the CFIR were identified, which enables stakeholders and teams to tailor implementation of teams at the local level to impact the accessibility and quality of primary care.

Mid-level health providers (MLHPs) in delivering and improving access to primary health care services - a narrative review

Background

For primary healthcare systems to bring care closer to the communities, the availability of appropriate human resources is crucial. The primary care workforce in the world is expanding to include non-physician health workers (NPHWs) to increase its capacity. Also, NPHWs as mid-level health providers (MLHPs) are currently being employed in high- and low-income countries to assist doctors and specialists to make up for the scarcity of health professionals. Given the wide prevalence in the deployment of NPHWs as mid-level health providers, this article collates recent evidence on the role of MLHPs in improving access to primary healthcare services, and their enablers and barriers in integrating them in primary care teams. The article also presents gaps in evidence and recommendations for the way forward.

Methods

A systematic search of contemporary literature published from January 2012 to September 2022 was undertaken using two bibliographic databases (PubMed and Cochrane) and hand searching the reference list of retrieved papers. Duplicates, papers older than ten years, and whose focus was not on primary healthcare were excluded. The papers finalised for appraisal were scrutinised for key themes and their summaries were collated for analysis. The papers comprised of twenty-four quantitative, twenty-three qualitative, and nine mixed approach study designs (n = 56) due to which a narrative approach was conducted as per guidelines.

Results

The review identified and presents the following themes - task shifting and its effectiveness in service delivery, quality of care, enablers and barriers of NPHWs in primary health care in both HIC and LMIC settings.

Conclusion

Task-shifting interventions need effective engagement and constant coordination with relevant stakeholders. For this, policymakers, public health researchers, healthcare professionals of all cadres and community members need to be involved across all stages of introduction and absorption of the cadre into the primary healthcare delivery system.

[Between New Responsibility and Daily Routines - The Role of the VERAH in GP Care: A Qualitative Secondary Data Case Study of the Introduction of Software-Based Case Management]

BACKGROUND

The concept of Care Assistant in General Practice (VERAH) was developed in order to integrate non-medical staff more strongly into primary care and thus to meet the increasing demand for care and the simultaneous shortage of medical staff. VERAHs are increasingly responsible for software-supported case management and are thus confronted with new tasks. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the role of the VERAH in primary care practices.

METHODS

The present study is a qualitative secondary data analysis; the data collection took place within the projects VESPEERA and TelePraCMan. Twenty individual interviews and two focus group meetings were conducted with a total of 30 physicians, VERAHs and medical assistants from primary care. The data were analysed qualitatively according to Emerson. Contextual and socio-demographic data were collected with an accompanying questionnaire.

RESULTS

The VERAHs of all primary care practices from which interview partners participated performed tasks within software-supported case management. Concerning the role of the VERAH, three themes were identified in the interviews: a) concrete tasks of the VERAH in software-supported case management within the practice team, b) relevance of software-supported case management within the activities of the VERAHS and c) relationship between VERAHs and patients.

CONCLUSION

Taking over tasks in software-supported case management can contribute to strengthening and expanding the role of the VERAH. In the future, more attention should be paid to a clear description of the new role, and the conditions of the VERAHs' task fulfilment should be considered.

PA and NP general practice employment in the Netherlands

ABSTRACT

General practitioners (GPs) are the cornerstone of primary healthcare in the Netherlands. As a national strategy, physician associates/assistants (PAs) and NPs were introduced to address growing healthcare demand. In this study, four representative practices were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively-two solo practices with a PA or NP and two group practices with a PA or NP. A reference group of GPs served as experts. The annual encounters per full-time GP averaged 6,839; for the NPs, 2,636; and the PAs, 4,926. Billable services were 70% to 100%, averaging 71% for NPs and 85% for PAs, and in three of the four practices, the employment of the NP or PA was cost-efficient. The qualitative data show that PAs and NPs contribute to general practice, easing the workload so that the GP has more time for complex patients. PA and NP employment was financially beneficial in 75% of cases.

The patient's first point of contact (PINPOINT) - protocol of a prospective multicenter study of communication and decision-making during patient assessments by primary care registered nurses

BACKGROUND

A major challenge for primary care is to set priorities and balance demands with available resources. The registered nurses in this study are practice nurses working in primary care offices, playing a large role in initial assessments. The overall objective of this research is to investigate practices of communication and decision-making during nurses' initial assessment of patients' health problems in primary care, examine working mechanisms in good practices and develop feasible solutions.

METHODS

Project PINPOINT aims for a prospective multicenter study using various methods for data collection and analysis. A purposive sample of 150 patient‒nurse consultations, including 30 nurses and 150 patients, will be recruited at primary care centers in three different geographic areas of southwest Sweden. The study will report on outcomes of communication practices in relation to patient-reported expectations and experiences, communication processes and patient involvement, assessment and decision-making, related priorities and value conflicts with data from patient questionnaires, audio-recorded real-time communication, and reflective interviews with nurses.

DISCUSSION

This research will contribute to the knowledge needed for the guidance of first-line decision-making processes to best meet patient and public health needs. This knowledge is necessary for the development of assessments and decisions to be better aligned to patients and to set priorities. Insights from this research can empower patients and service providers and help understand and enhance feasible person-centered communication strategies tailored to patients' level of health literacy. More specifically, this research will contribute to knowledge that can strengthen nurses' communication, assessments, and clinical decision-making in primary care. In the long term, this will contribute to how the competencies of practice nurses and other professionals are organized and carried out to make the best use of the resources within primary care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06067672.

Acts of negotiation: toward a grounded theory of nursing practice in chronic wound care in Austria

BACKGROUND

Demographic change and the rise of diabetes mellitus are leading to a projected increase in the prevalence of chronic wounds. People suffering from chronic wounds experience significant losses in their health-related quality of life. Health systems struggle to meet the needs of these persons, even in high-income countries. This paper explores wound nurses' perspectives on their professional practice in Austria. They play a key role as they do much of the treatment work, contribute to advancing the field, and enable interprofessional coordination. Their perspectives enable insights into how a health system provides care for elderly and chronically ill people.

METHODS

We used the Constructivist Grounded Theory framework to analyse transcripts of 14 semi-structured qualitative interviews with nurses who work in different treatment settings.

RESULTS

We identified three themes. Firstly, the interviewees characterise working with patients as a balancing act between offering enough support to build a trustful relationship while protecting themselves against the overwhelming situation of caring for a chronically ill person. Secondly, the interviewees compensate for nonexistent care pathways by building informal networks with doctors, which requires delicate relationship work. Thirdly, the study participants must prove their competence in every new professional encounter. Their need for professional autonomy clashes with the traditional doctor-nurse hierarchy. Based on these insights, we propose a grounded theory that conceives of nursing practice in terms of 'acts of negotiations'.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that wound nurses in Austria operate in an institutional environment whose outdated imagination of the nursing role is at odds with the care demands that arise from a growing number of elderly and chronically ill people. We detailed the 'acts of negotiation' nurses deploy to compensate for this situation. We identify areas for policy intervention to strengthen the autonomy of wound nurses, including access to statutory health insurance billing.

Patterns of GP and nurse independent prescriber prescriptions for antibiotics dispensed in the community in England: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Physician-nurse task shifting, a process of delegation whereby tasks are moved to other specialized healthcare workers, is used in primary care in many countries to improve access, efficiency and quality of care. One such task is the prescription of medicines.

OBJECTIVES

To identify nurse independent prescriber (NIP) and GP numbers in England, the proportions and types of NIP and GP antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in the community, and the impact of COVID-19 on the volume, rate and types of antibiotic prescriptions dispensed.

METHODS

Descriptive population-based retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data on prescriptions for antibiotics dispensed in the community in England between January 2014 and October 2021.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2021, numbers (headcount) of NIPs whose prescriptions were dispensed in the community rose by 146% to 34 997. GP numbers (headcount) rose by 10% to 44 681. Of the 25.373 million antibiotic prescriptions dispensed between 2014 and 2021, NIPs were responsible for 8.6%. The rate of dispensed antibiotic prescriptions per prescriber per calendar year decreased (by 50% for NIPs and by 21% for GPs) between 2014 and 2020. This decreasing trend continued following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic across both groups. Narrow-spectrum antibiotics (penicillins, macrolides, tetracyclines) were the most frequently dispensed across both NIPs and GPs.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPs are an increasing contributory influence on total antibiotic prescribing and should be included in antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Interventions for this group need to be tailored to the population and context in which they work.

The contribution of primary care practitioners to interventions reducing loneliness and social isolation in older people-An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Social connection is a fundamental human need. Its absence can lead to loneliness and social isolation, adversely impacting health and well-being. Given their regular contact and trusted relationships with older people, practitioners delivering community-based primary care are well-positioned to address this issue. However, their contribution to addressing loneliness and social isolation is unclear.

AIM

This integrative review explores the contribution of the primary care workforce to interventions aimed at reducing loneliness and social isolation in community-dwelling older people.

METHOD

Using an integrative review method, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and PubMed were searched for original research published between 2000 and 2022. Fourteen papers reporting 13 primary studies were appraised for methodological quality and included in the review. Data were extracted into a summary table and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Included studies came from over six countries. Internationally, primary care services have diverse structures, funding and workforces influencing their response to loneliness and social isolation. All but one intervention was multi-component, with ten studies including a group-based activity and three providing primarily individual-level activities. Only six studies reported reductions in loneliness following the intervention. Three themes were identified: characteristics of interventions; implementation context, barriers and facilitators; and differing contributions of primary care practitioners in addressing loneliness and social isolation of older people.

CONCLUSION

There is increasing demand and scope for primary care practitioners to assist lonely and socially isolated older people. It is important to understand how to equip and incentivise these practitioners to routinely identify, assess and respond to lonely and socially isolated older people despite varying implementation contexts. There is a need for further research that explores how the primary care team can be better utilised to deliver effective interventions that reduce the health impacts of loneliness and social isolation.

How does the quality of care for type 2 diabetic patients benefit from GPs-nurses' teamwork? A staggered difference-in-differences design based on a French pilot program

In many countries, policies have explicitly encouraged primary care teams and inter-professional cooperation and skill mix, as a way to improve both productive efficiency gains and quality improvement. France faces barriers to developing team working as well as new and more advanced roles for health care professionals including nurses. We aim to estimate the impact of a national pilot experiment of teamwork between general practitioners (GPs) and advance practitioners nurses (APN)-who substitute and complement GPs-on yearly quality of care process indicators for type two diabetes patients (T2DP). Implemented by a not-for-profit meso-tier organisation and supported by the Ministry of Health, the pilot relied on the voluntary enrolment of newly GPs from 2012 to 2015; the staffing and training of APNs; skill mixing and new remuneration schemes. We use latent-response formulation models, control for endogeneity and selection bias by using controlled before-after and quasi-experimental design combining coarsened exact matching-prior to the treatment, at both GPs (435 treated vs 973 control) and T2DP levels -, with intention to treat (ITT; 18,310 in each group) and per protocol (PP, 2943 in each group) perspectives, as well as difference-in-differences estimates on balanced panel claims data from the National Health Insurance Fund linked to clinical data over the period 2010-2017. We show evidence of a positive and significant positive impact for T2DP followed-up by newly enrolled GPs in the pilot compared to the pretreatment period and the control group. The effect magnitudes were larger for PP than for ITT subsamples.

Nurses' perception of identity, practice and support needed in primary care: A descriptive qualitative study

AIMS

To explore how primary care registered nurses (PCRNs) describe their professional identity, their perception of their practice, and the support they need to effectively perform the responsibilities of their role.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design using inductive content analysis.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with registered nurses (n = 14) working in primary care settings in the United States between June 2018 and December 2020. Inductive content analysis was used and comprised three phases: preparation, organizing, and reporting. COREQ reporting guidelines were used.

RESULTS

Three categories were discovered related to PCRN identity and practice: Wearing Multiple Hats, Practicing Within Bounds and Change is a Part of Practice. There were also three categories for support needed: Entering In, Ongoing Support and Making it a Better Place. Within each category, subcategories were identified.

CONCLUSION

Primary care registered nurses have a unique professional identity and practice. When entering the setting, nurses must acquire the skills and knowledge to ask the right questions and navigate the system to meet the diverse and complex needs of their patients. PCRNs recognize change is a part of practice and have ideas and visions for what the role of PCRNs could be.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSION

Recognizing the unique identity and practice of PCRNs is necessary to create an environment that leverages their skills and knowledge.

IMPACT

We identified key elements of PCRN identity and practice and the support necessary to meet their needs. Healthcare organizations must ensure nurses new to the practice setting receive training and support for their unique and essential role. Additionally, leaders must partner with nurses to enhance nursing practice and achieve optimal patient outcomes.

REPORTING METHOD

Adherence to COREQ guidelines were maintained.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Pharmacists' Perceptions of Physician-Pharmacist Collaboration-A 2022 Cross-Sectional Survey in Poland

Patient-centered care requires close collaboration among multiple healthcare professionals, including physician-pharmacist collaboration (especially as a part of pharmaceutical care). This study aimed to assess pharmacists' perceptions of physician-pharmacist collaboration as well as to identify factors associated with the willingness to provide pharmaceutical care services in Poland. This questionnaire-based survey was carried out in 2022 among community pharmacists from one of the largest franchise chain pharmacy networks in Poland. Completed questionnaires were received from 635 community pharmacists (response rate of 47.9%). Almost all the pharmacists agreed with the statement that there is a need for physician-pharmacist collaboration (98.2%), and 94.8% declared that pharmacists can help physicians in patient care and pharmacotherapy. Most pharmacists (80%) believed that physicians were not aware of the competencies of pharmacists resulting from Polish law. Patient education (89.9%), detection of polypharmacy (88%), and detection of interactions between drugs and dietary supplements (85.7%) were the most common tasks in the field of pharmaceutical care that can be provided by a pharmacist. Females were more likely (p < 0.05) to declare the need for physician-pharmacist collaboration. Age and location of the pharmacy were the most important factors (p < 0.05) associated with pharmacists' attitudes toward physician-pharmacist collaboration.

Identifying key policy objectives for strong primary care: a cross-sectional study

AIM

The aim of this study was to identify key policy objectives by investigating the perception of important stakeholders and affected professionals concerning relevance and feasibility of a successful primary care (PC) reform.

BACKGROUND

Since 2013, the Austrian PC system has been undergoing a reform process to establish multiprofessional primary care units. The reforms have various defined objectives and lack clear priorities.

METHODS

After the definition and consensus-based selection of 12 policy objectives, a cross-sectional online survey on their relevance and feasibility was distributed via email and social media to PC and public health networks. The survey was conducted in the period from January to February 2020. Results were analyzed descriptively, and further, Pearson Chi-Square Test or Fisher's Exact Test was performed for group comparison regarding respondents' characteristics. Open-ended responses were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

FINDINGS

In total, 169 questionnaires were completed. A total of 46.3% of the responders had more than 20 years of professional experience (female: 60.5%). A mandatory internship in general practice, vocational training for general practice, and a modern remuneration system were the three top-rated policy objectives regarding relevance. A mandatory internship in general practice, specialization in general practice, and coding of services and diagnosis were assessed as the most feasible objectives. The group comparisons regarding working field, years of professional experience, age, and sex did not show any meaningful results in the evaluation of relevance and feasibility.

DISCUSSION

In the view of the study participants, easily obtainable objectives include adapting the duration and setting of internships for medical students, as well as mandatory vocational training for GP trainees. Further efforts are necessary to achieve complex objectives such as the adoption of a modern remuneration scheme and a comprehensive quality assurance program. Building capacity and creating team-oriented environments are also important aspects of a successful PC reform.

The changing employment of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician associates/assistants

ABSTRACT

Information on the employment of patient-care clinicians is needed for policy planning and human resource management. The 2021 Bureau of Labor Statistics employment data were probed for occupational settings of 698,700 physicians and surgeons, 246,690 nurse practitioners (NPs), and 139,100 physician associates/assistants (PAs). These three health care professionals accounted for approximately 1.1 million medical and surgical clinicians serving a US population of 331.5 million. Clinician demographics differ-in 2021, the median age of physicians was 45 years; NPs, 43 years; and PAs, 39 years. The largest employment location is "office of a physician" (physician, 53%; NP, 47%; PA, 51%), followed by hospitals (physician, 25%; NP, 25%; PA, 23%), and outpatient centers (physician, 4%; NP, 9%; PA, 10%). The 10-year job outlook predicts physician growth at 3%, NPs at 46%, and PAs at 28%. NP and PA employment is growing more than physicians because of constrained physician postgraduate education funding. Other factors influencing employment changes include medical practice mergers, the rising value of team-based care, the cost of new medical schools, and task shifting.

180° view on general practitioners' leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study

OBJECTIVES

Strong primary care leaders are needed to assure high quality services for patient populations. This study analysed general practitioners' (GP) leadership skills comparing practice-level self and staff assessments based on the full range of leadership model and the leader-member exchange (LMX).

SETTING

The questionnaire survey was conducted among German general practice leaders and their staff participating in the IMPROVEjob trial.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population comprised 60 German general practices with 366 participants: 84 GP practice leaders and 282 employees (28 physicians and 254 practice assistants).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Leadership skills of the practice leaders were measured using the Integrative Leadership Questionnaire (German Fragebogen für integrative Führung) and the LMX-7 questionnaire. Leaders rated themselves and practice staff rated their leaders. The data was analysed by paired mean comparisons on the practice level.

RESULTS

For most leadership dimensions, practice leaders rated themselves higher than their employees rated them. Differences were found for transformational leadership (p<0.001, d=0.41), especially for the dimensions 'innovation' (p<0.001, d=0.69) and 'individuality focus' (p<0.001, d=0.50). For transactional leadership, the dimension 'goal setting' differed significantly (p<0.01, d=0.30) but not the other dimensions. Scores for negative leadership were low and showed no differences between leaders and employees. Interestingly, employed physicians' rated their practice leaders higher on the two transformational ('performance development', 'providing a vision') and all transactional dimensions. The LMX-7 scale showed high quality relationships between leaders and employees.

CONCLUSIONS

This 180° analysis of GPs' leadership skills with self and employee ratings indicated good relationships. There is a potential to improve leadership regarding goal-setting, innovation and focusing on individual team members. These results allow for the development of targeted interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012677. Registered 16 October 2019.

Models of care and the role of clinical pharmacists in UK primary care for older adults: A scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

There has been global investment of new ways of working to support workforce pressures, including investment in clinical pharmacists working in primary care by the NHS in the England. Clinical pharmacists are well suited to support older adults who have multiple long-term conditions and are on multiple medications. It is important to establish an evidence base for the role of clinical pharmacists in supporting older adults in primary care, to inform strategic and research priorities. The aim of this scoping review is to identify, map and describe existing research and policy/guidance on the role of clinical pharmacists in primary care supporting older adults, and the models of care they provide.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A scoping review guided by the Joanne Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, using a three-step strategy. We will search Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, PSYCHInfo, and Cochrane for English language articles, from 2015 -present day. Grey literature will be searched using Grey Matters guidelines, the Index of Grey Literature and Alternative Sources and Resources, and Google keyword searching. References of all included sources will be hand searched to identify further resources. Using the Population, Concept and Context framework for inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles will be independently screened by two reviewers. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be refined after we become familiar with the search results, following the iterative nature of a scoping review. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool using Microsoft Excel and presented using a narrative synthesis approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this review. Review findings will be disseminated in academic conferences and used to inform subsequent qualitative research. Findings will be published and shared with relevant local and national organisations.

The changing employment of physicians, NPs, and PAs

ABSTRACT

Information on the employment of patient-care clinicians is needed for policy planning and human resource management. The 2021 Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) employment data were probed for occupational settings of 698,700 physicians and surgeons, 246,690 NPs, and 139,100 physician associates/assistants (PAs). These three healthcare professionals accounted for about 1.1 million medical and surgical clinicians serving a US population of 331.5 million. Clinician demographics differ-in 2021, the median age of physicians was 45 years; NPs, 43 years; and PAs, 39 years. The largest employment location is "office of a physician" (physician, 53%; NP, 47%; PA, 51%), followed by hospitals (physician, 25%; NP, 25%; PA, 23%), and outpatient centers (physician, 4%; NP, 9%; PA, 10%). The 10-year job outlook predicts physician growth at 3%, NPs at 46%, and PAs at 28%. NP and PA employment is growing more than that of physicians because of constrained physician postgraduate education funding. Other factors influencing employment changes include medical practice mergers, the rising value of team-based care, the cost of new medical schools, and task shifting.

Are Nurse-Led Patient Consultations and Nurse-Led Dose Adjustments of Permanent Medication Acceptable for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension in General Practice? - Results of a Focus Group Study

Purpose

Practice nurse (PN)-led patient consultations and PN-led dosage adjustments of permanent medication are uncommon and not well studied in general practice (GP) in Germany. We investigated the perspectives of patients with common chronic diseases in Germany, diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and/or arterial hypertension (AT), on PN-led patient consultations and dosage adjustments of permanent medications in GP.

Patients and Methods

In this exploratory qualitative study, online focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Patients were recruited from collaborating GPs according to a predefined sampling plan. Patients were eligible for this study if they had DM or AT treated by their GP, were on at least one permanent medication and were aged 18 years or older. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic analyses.

Results

Analyses of two focus groups, involving a total of 17 patients, revealed four main themes: (1) openness to the PN-led care and perceived benefits, eg because of patients' confidence in PNs' skills, or patients' impression that PN-led care would better meet their needs and increase their compliance. Some patients had (2) reservations and perceived risks, especially for PN-led medication changes eg feeling that medication adjustments were a GP's issue. Patients identified (3) reasons for encounters where they were likely to accept PN-led consultation and medication advice, eg management of DM, AT and thyroid disease. Patients also saw several important general requirements for the implementation of PN-led care in German general practice (4).

Conclusion

There is a potential for openness towards PN-led consultation and PN-led medication adjustment for permanent medication in patients with DM or AT. This study is the first qualitative study to investigate PN-led consultations and medication advice in German general practice. If the implementation of PN-led care is planned, our findings add the patients' perspectives of acceptable reasons for encounter for PN-led care and their general requirements.

Impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: protocol for a rapid scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Interprofessional teams and funding and payment provider arrangements are key attributes of high-performing primary care. Several Canadian jurisdictions have introduced team-based models with different payment models. Despite these investments, the evidence of impact is mixed. This has raised questions about whether team-based primary care models are being implemented to facilitate team collaboration and effectiveness. Thus, we present a protocol for a rapid scoping review to systematically map, synthesise and summarise the existing literature on the impact of provider remuneration mechanisms and extrinsic and intrinsic incentives in team-based primary care. This review will answer three research questions: (1) What is the impact of provider remuneration models on team, patient, provider and system outcomes in primary care?; (2) What extrinsic and intrinsic incentives have been used in interprofessional primary care teams?; and (3) What is the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic team-based incentives on team, patient, provider and system outcomes?

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a rapid scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. We will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit) and grey literature sources (Google Scholar, Google). This review will consider all empirical studies and full-text English-language articles published between 2000 and 2022. Reviewers will independently perform the literature search, data extraction and synthesis of included studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to appraise the quality of evidence. The literature will be synthesised, summarised and mapped to themes that answer the research question of this review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required. Findings from this study will be written for publication in an open-access peer-review journal and presented at national and international conferences. Knowledge users are part of the research team and will assist with disseminating findings to the public, clinicians, funders and professional associations.

Potential Factors Influencing Adoption of a Primary Care Pathway to Prevent Functional Decline in Older Adults

Introduction

To help recognize and care for community-dwelling older adults living with frailty, we plan to implement a primary care pathway consisting of frailty screening, shared decision-making to select a preventive intervention, and facilitated referral to community-based services. In this study, we examined the potential factors influencing adoption of this pathway.

Methods

In this qualitative, descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients aged 70 years and older, health professionals (HPs), and managers from four primary care practices in the province of Quebec, representatives of community-based services and geriatric clinics located near the practices. Two researchers conducted an inductive/deductive thematic analysis, by first drawing on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and then adding emergent subthemes.

Results

We recruited 28 patients, 29 HPs, and 8 managers from four primary care practices, 16 representatives from community-based services, and 10 representatives from geriatric clinics. Participants identified several factors that could influence adoption of the pathway: the availability of electronic and printed versions of the decision aids; the complexity of including a screening form in the electronic health record; public policies that limit the capacity of community-based services; HPs' positive attitudes toward shared decision-making and their work overload; and lack of funding.

Conclusions

These findings will inform the implementation of the care pathway, so that it meets the needs of key stakeholders and can be scaled up.