Tranexamic acid and obstetric hemorrhage: give empirically or selectively?

Efficacy of topical tranexamic acid in gender-affirming mastectomy

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding complications, such as hematoma, are frequently encountered after breast surgery. To mitigate these complications, the use of tranexamic acid (TXA), has become increasingly popular in breast procedures. This study aims to investigate the impact of topical moistening of the surgical wound with TXA on the reduction of postoperative bleeding complications in patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study examined postoperative bleeding outcomes in patients who underwent GAM between April 2014 and March 2024. The use of intraoperative topical TXA was documented, along with rates of hematoma, seroma, and other postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The study included 456 patients: 62 who received topical moistening with 10 mL of 50 mg/mL TXA on each breast and 394 control patients who received standard hospital protocol for intraoperative hemostasis. Postoperative hematoma occurred in 3 patients (4.9%) who received topical TXA and 18 patients (4.6%) who did not (p=0.92). The incidence of other postoperative complications did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study found no statistically significant differences in postoperative bleeding complication rates between patients who received TXA and those who followed the standard hemostasis protocol. Although our results suggest that topical TXA is safe and does not increase thromboembolic risk, its efficacy in reducing bleeding complications in GAM patients remains uncertain. The study's limitations, including its single-center design and small sample size, highlight the need for larger, multicenter randomized trials to establish the role of topical TXA in improving postoperative outcomes for GAM procedures.

Evaluating tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjunct to treat and prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We provide an overview of TXA, including its pharmacology, key findings of randomized trials and observational studies, and critical patient safety information.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pharmacokinetic data indicate that TXA infusions result in peak plasma concentration within 3 min (range: 1-6.6 min). Ex-vivo pharmacodynamic data suggest that low-dose TXA (5 mg/kg) inhibits maximum lysis for at least 1 h. In predominantly developing countries, TXA has demonstrated a 19% reduction in the risk of bleeding-related death among patients with PPH. Based on high-quality randomized trials, TXA prophylaxis does not effectively reduce the risk of PPH during vaginal delivery and is likely ineffective in reducing the PPH risk during cesarean delivery. TXA exposure does not increase the risk of maternal thrombotic events. Maternal deaths have occurred from accidental intrathecal TXA injection from look-alike medication errors.

SUMMARY

TXA has shown promise as an important adjunct for PPH treatment, especially in low-resource settings. However, TXA is not recommended as PPH prophylaxis during vaginal or cesarean delivery. Patient safety initiatives should be prioritized to prevent maternal death from accidental intrathecal TXA injection.

Tranexamic acid versus misoprostol for management of postpartum hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

To conduct the first-ever systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the antihemorrhagic utility and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus misoprostol for management (prevention and/or treatment) of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

METHODS

Six databases were screened from inception until May 2023 and updated in September 2023. The RCTs were assessed for quality according to the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. The endpoints were summarized as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs with 2121 patients (TXA = 1061 and misoprostol = 1060) were analyzed. There was no significant difference between TXA and misoprostol groups regarding the mean intraoperative blood loss (n = 9 RCTs, MD = 17.32 ml, 95% CI [-40.43, 75.07], p = 0.56), mean change in hemoglobin (n = 6 RCTs, MD = 0.11 mg/dl, 95% CI [-0.1, 0.31], p = 0.30), mean hospital stay (n = 2 RCTs, MD = -0.3 day, 95% CI [-0.61, 0.01], p = 0.06), blood transfusion rate (n = 4 RCTs, RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.16, 1.47], p = 0.2), and rate of additional uterotonic agents (n = 4 RCTs, RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.72, 1.53], p = 0.81). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the results, and there was no evidence of publication bias. Regarding safety endpoints, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the rates of minor side effects, such as diarrhea, fever, nausea, and vomiting. No patient developed thromboembolic events in the TXA group.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant antihemorrhagic efficacy between adjunct TXA and misoprostol for the management of PPH. The safety profile was comparable between both agents.

Tranexamic acid for reduction of blood loss after Caesarean delivery: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the TRAAP2 trial

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid is associated with a reduction of blood loss after Caesarean delivery, but cost-effectiveness for this indication has not been assessed.

METHODS

We used data from the TRAAP2 trial, a multicentre, double-blinded, RCT aimed at estimating the efficacy of tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage among women undergoing Caesarean delivery. Women recruited at 27 French maternity hospitals from 2018 to 2020 were enrolled before the procedure if they had a Caesarean delivery before or during labour at 34 or more weeks of gestation. The main outcomes were the cost of hospital stay for delivery and the incremental cost per delivery without complication within 90 days after delivery with tranexamic acid compared with placebo. Differences in costs and the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) were estimated using linear regression models, and the cost-effectiveness probability of tranexamic acid compared with placebo was estimated through the parametric distribution of the INMB.

RESULTS

The proportion of women without complications at day 90 was 70.7% in the tranexamic acid group and 66.0% in the placebo group. Mean total costs until occurrence of a complication of interest were €3321 in the tranexamic acid group and €3260 in the placebo group, resulting in a difference between the two groups of 7.2% and €55 after multiple imputation. The adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €762 per additional Caesarean delivery without a complication at 90 days after delivery. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €10,000, the cost-effectiveness probability of tranexamic acid compared with placebo was 99.9%, varying from 5.8% to 100.0% for thresholds from €0 to €10,000 per additional delivery without a complication at day 90.

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss is cost-effective in reducing complications after Caesarean delivery at day 90 postpartum. However, the effect size (in cost and effectiveness) is very low.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03431805.

Prophylactic Administration of Tranexamic Acid Reduces Blood Products' Transfusion and Intensive Care Admission in Women Undergoing High-Risk Cesarean Sections

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a major cause of maternal mortality. Tranexamic acid (TxA) has shown effectiveness in reducing PPH-related maternal bleeding events and deaths. We conducted a cohort study including parturient women at high risk of bleeding after undergoing a cesarean section (CS). Participants were divided into two groups: the treatment group received prophylactic 1-g TxA before surgery (n = 500), while the comparison group underwent CS without TxA treatment (n = 500). The primary outcome measured increased maternal blood loss following CS, defined as more than a 10% drop in hemoglobin concentration within 24 h post-CS and/or a drop of ≥2 g/dL in maternal hemoglobin concentration. Secondary outcomes included PPH indicators, ICU admission, hospital stay, TxA complications, and neonatal data. TxA administration significantly reduced hemoglobin decrease by more than 10%: there was a 35.4% decrease in the TxA group vs. a 59.4% decrease in the non-TxA group, p < 0.0001 and hemoglobin decreased by ≥2 g/dL (11.4% in the TxA group vs. 25.2% in non-TxA group, p < 0.0001), reduced packed red blood cell transfusion (p = 0.0174), and resulted in lower ICU admission rates (p = 0.034) and shorter hospitalization (p < 0.0001). Complication rates and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly. In conclusion, prophylactic TxA administration during high-risk CS may effectively reduce blood loss, providing a potential intervention to improve maternal outcomes.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean section: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Tranexamic acid is a cost-effective intervention for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage among women who undergo cesarean delivery, but the evidence to support its use is conflicting. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in low- and high-risk cesarean deliveries.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal from inception to April 2022 (updated October 2022 and February 2023) with no language restrictions. In addition, grey literature sources were also explored.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials that investigated the prophylactic use of intravenous tranexamic acid in addition to standard uterotonic agents among women who underwent cesarean deliveries in comparison with a placebo, standard treatment, or prostaglandins were included in this meta-analysis.

METHODS

We used the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct all statistical analyses using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 50 randomized controlled trials (6 in only high-risk patients and 2 with prostaglandins as the comparator) that evaluated tranexamic acid in our meta-analysis. Tranexamic acid reduced the risk for blood loss >1000 mL, the mean total blood loss, and the need for blood transfusion in both low- and high-risk patients. Tranexamic acid was associated with a beneficial effect in the secondary outcomes, including a decline in hemoglobin levels and the need for additional uterotonic agents. Tranexamic acid increased the risk for nonthromboembolic adverse events but, based on limited data, did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. The quality of evidence was rated as low to very low for outcomes in the low-risk population and moderate for most outcomes in the high-risk subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid may reduce the risk for blood loss in cesarean deliveries with a higher benefit observed in high-risk patients, but the lack of high-quality evidence precludes any strong conclusions. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. Additional studies, especially in the high-risk population and focused on evaluating the timing of tranexamic acid administration, are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean among women with twins: a secondary analysis of the TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although prophylactic tranexamic acid administration after cesarean delivery resulted in a lower incidence of calculated estimated blood loss of >1000 mL or red cell transfusion by day 2, its failure to reduce the incidence of hemorrhage-related secondary clinical outcomes (TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery trial) makes its use questionable. The magnitude of its effect may differ in women at higher risk of blood loss, including those with multiple pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effect of tranexamic acid vs placebo to prevent blood loss after cesarean delivery among women with multiple pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of the TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery trial data, a double-blind, randomized controlled trial from March 2018 to January 2020 in 27 French maternity hospitals, that included 319 women with multiple pregnancies. Women with a cesarean delivery before or during labor at ≥34 weeks of gestation were randomized to receive intravenously 1 g of tranexamic acid (n=160) or placebo (n=159), both with prophylactic uterotonics. The primary outcome was a calculated estimated blood loss of >1000 mL or a red blood cell transfusion by 2 days after delivery. The secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory blood loss measurements.

RESULTS

Of the 4551 women randomized in this trial, 319 had a multiple pregnancy and cesarean delivery, and 298 (93.4%) had primary outcome data available. This outcome occurred in 62 of 147 women (42.2%) in the tranexamic acid group and 67 of 152 (44.1%) receiving placebo (adjusted risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.38; P=.86). No significant between-group differences occurred for any hemorrhage-related clinical outcomes: gravimetrically estimated blood loss, provider-assessed clinically significant hemorrhage, additional uterotonics, postpartum blood transfusion, arterial embolization, and emergency surgery (P>.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Among women with a multiple pregnancy and cesarean delivery, prophylactic tranexamic acid did not reduce the incidence of any blood loss-related outcomes.

Tranexamic acid administered during cesarean delivery in high-risk patients: maternal pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and coagulation status

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid is frequently administered for postpartum hemorrhage. The World Health Organization recommends 1 g intravenous dosing, repeated once after 30 minutes for ongoing bleeding. Understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tranexamic acid in patients at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage may enable dosage tailoring for optimal antifibrinolysis with minimal adverse events, such as thrombosis or renal cortical necrosis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report tranexamic acid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after 1 g intravenous dosing during cesarean delivery in patients at risk of hemorrhage. The primary endpoint was tranexamic acid plasma concentration of >10 μg/mL, known to inhibit 80% of fibrinolysis. In addition, the correlation between patient demographics and rotational thromboelastometry coagulation changes were analyzed.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective study, 20 women aged 18 to 50 years, ≥23 weeks of gestation undergoing cesarean delivery with at least 1 major (placenta previa, suspected placenta accreta spectrum, or active bleeding) or 2 minor (≥2 previous cesarean deliveries, previous postpartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, polyhydramnios, macrosomia, obesity, or suspected placental abruption) risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage were recruited. The exclusion criteria were allergy to tranexamic acid, inherited thrombophilia, previous or current thrombosis, seizure history, renal or liver dysfunction, anticoagulation, or category III fetal heart tracing. Tranexamic acid 1 g was administered after umbilical cord clamping. Blood samples were drawn at 3, 7, 15, and 30 minutes and then at 30-minute intervals up to 5 hours. Plasma concentrations were evaluated as mean (standard error). Serial rotational thromboelastometry was performed and correlated with tranexamic acid plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 37.5 years (interquartile range, 35.0-39.5), and the median body mass index was 28.6 kg/m2 (interquartile range, 24.9-35.0). The median blood loss (estimated or quantitative) was 1500 mL (interquartile range, 898.5-2076.0). Of note, 9 of 20 (45%) received a transfusion of packed red blood cells. The mean peak tranexamic acid plasma concentration at 3 minutes was 59.8±4.7 μg/mL. All patients had a plasma concentration >10 μg/mL for 1 hour after infusion. Plasma concentration was >10 μg/mL in more than half of the patients at 3 hours and fell <10 μg/mL in all patients at 5 hours. There was a moderate negative correlation between body mass index and the plasma concentration area under the curve (r=-0.49; 95% confidence interval, -0.77 to -0.07; P=.026). Rotational thromboelastometry EXTEM maximum clot firmness had a weak positive correlation with longitudinal plasma concentration (r=0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.46; P<.001). EXTEM maximum clot lysis was 0% after infusion in 18 patients (90%), and no patient in the study demonstrated a maximum lysis of >15% at any interval from 3 minutes to 5 hours. There was no significant correlation between EXTEM clot lysis at 30 minutes and longitudinal tranexamic acid plasma concentrations (r=0.10; 95% confidence interval, -0.20 to 0.19; P=.252).

CONCLUSION

After standard 1 g intravenous dosing of tranexamic acid during cesarean delivery in patients at high risk of hemorrhage, a plasma concentration of ≥10 μg/mL was sustained for at least 60 minutes. Plasma tranexamic acid levels correlated inversely with body mass index. The concurrent use of rotational thromboelastometry may demonstrate tranexamic acid's impact on clot firmness but not a hyperfibrinolysis-derived trigger for therapy.

Emergencies in obstetric anaesthesia: a narrative review

We conducted a narrative review in six areas of obstetric emergencies: category-1 caesarean section; difficult and failed airway; massive obstetric haemorrhage; hypertensive crisis; emergencies related to neuraxial anaesthesia; and maternal cardiac arrest. These areas represent significant research published within the last five years, with emphasis on large multicentre randomised trials, national or international practice guidelines and recommendations from major professional societies. Key topics discussed: prevention and management of failed neuraxial technique; role of high-flow nasal oxygenation and choice of neuromuscular drug in obstetric patients; prevention of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia; management of the difficult and failed obstetric airway; current perspectives on the use of tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate and cell salvage; guidance on neuraxial placement in a thrombocytopenic obstetric patient; management of neuraxial drug errors, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and unusually prolonged neuraxial block regression; and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in maternal cardiac arrest.

Hemostatic Effects of Tranexamic Acid in Cesarean Delivery: An Ancillary Study of the TRAAP2 Study

BACKGROUND

 Fibrinolysis activation during delivery contributes to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Clot lysis time studied with the global fibrinolytic capacity device (GFC/LT) is a functional test which rapidly assesses fibrinolytic profile. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an efficient antifibrinolytic therapy.

METHODS

 We prospectively studied fibrinolysis and coagulation in 33 women included in the TRAAP2 trial, which aimed to assess the impact of TXA in preventing PPH following a cesarean delivery. TXA or placebo was randomly administered after childbirth as part of the TRAAP2 trial's protocol. Fibrinolytic (GFC/LT, plasma concentration of fibrinolysis activators and inhibitors) and hemostatic parameters were assayed at three sample times (TREF [T-reference] after anesthesia, T15 and T120minutes after TXA, or placebo administration).

RESULTS

 All cesarean deliveries were elective. In the placebo group, the clot lysis time assessed with GFC/LT significantly decreased between TREF and T120, indicating an activated fibrinolysis (44 [interquartile range, IQR: 40-48] vs. 34 [IQR: 30-36] minutes, p<0.001). In both TXA and placebo groups, significant fluctuations of the plasmatic concentrations of fibrinolytic mediators were noticed over time, suggesting fibrinolysis activation. Clot lysis time measured by GFC/LT was significantly increased in women of the TXA group as compared with those in the placebo group at T15 (120 [120-120] vs. 36 [34-41] minutes, p<0.001) and T120minutes (113 [99-120] vs. 34 [30-36] minutes, p<0.001) after drug administration, indicating a decreased in fibrinolysis in those women.

CONCLUSIONS

 GFC/LT evidenced fibrinolysis activation during cesarean delivery, linked to a decrease in fibrinolytic inhibitors. GFC/LT revealed a significant antifibrinolytic effect of TXA compared with placebo.

Update on Applications and Limitations of Perioperative Tranexamic Acid

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a potent antifibrinolytic with documented efficacy in reducing blood loss and allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in several clinical settings. With a growing emphasis on patient blood management, TXA has become an integral aspect of perioperative blood conservation strategies. While clinical applications of TXA in the perioperative period are expanding, routine use in select clinical scenarios should be supported by evidence for efficacy. Furthermore, questions regarding optimal dosing without increased risk of adverse events such as thrombosis or seizures should be answered. Therefore, ongoing investigations into TXA utilization in cardiac surgery, obstetrics, acute trauma, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, pediatric surgery, and other perioperative settings continue. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the current applications and limitations of TXA use in the perioperative period.

Latest advances in postpartum hemorrhage management

Hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. A maternal health priority is improving how healthcare providers prevent and manage postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Because anesthesiologists can help facilitate how hospitals develop approaches for PPH prevention and anticipatory planning, we review the potential utility of PPH risk-assessment tools, bundles, and protocols. Anesthesiologists rely on clinical and diagnostic information for initiating and evaluating medical management. Therefore, we review modalities for measuring blood loss after delivery, which includes visual, volumetric, gravimetric, and colorimetric approaches. Point-of-care technologies for assessing changes in central hemodynamics (ultrasonography) and coagulation profiles (rotational thromboelastometry and thromboelastography) are also discussed. Anesthesiologists play a critical role in the medical and transfusion management of PPH. Therefore, we review blood ordering and massive transfusion protocols, fixed-ratio vs. goal-directed transfusion approaches, coagulation changes during PPH, and the potential clinical utility of the pharmacological adjuncts, tranexamic acid, and fibrinogen concentrate.