Pectoralis major flap for head and neck reconstruction in era of free flaps

Are Submental Flap Reconstructions From Oncological and Reconstructive Perspective Safe? Evaluation and Review of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Submental Flap Reconstructions

This study compared the risk of nodal metastasis progression in the submandibular area when using submental flap contralateral (SFC) or submental flap ipsilateral (SFI) relative to the tumor side. Thirty patients underwent treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Submental flap ipsilateral and SFC were used in 14 and 16 patients, respectively. After unilateral supraomohyoid neck dissection (levels I-III), the SFC group showed a significantly higher total number of positive lymph nodes removed (P = 0.014). In addition, the number of positive lymph nodes in the IB region was significantly higher in the SFC group compared with the SFI group (P = 0.001). Tumour relapse was the same in both groups (SFI: n = 4/SFC: n = 4). The authors' results suggest that SFC can be adequately used to reconstruct oral cavity defects because, after rerouting, the rotation arc reaches the upper incisors and covers the arc of SFI rotation in the oral cavity. Moreover, with SFC, a complete neck block dissection and more radical tumor resection can be achieved without limitations.

Versatility of the myocutaneous pectoralis major flap in oncology reconstruction: A literature review and practical application

Pectoralis major muscle flaps are considered versatile and allow large reconstructions of anatomical defects within a single surgical procedure. Considered a "workhorse" due to these characteristics, the pectoralis major muscle is an excellent option for surgical reconstruction. Several uses of this flap are described in the literature, such as protection of the jugulocarotid system after cervical lymph node dissection, oral, cervical, breast, diaphragmatic, hypopharyngeal, pharyngeal, laryngeal, and esophageal reconstructions.

Quality of Life Assessment and Comparative Analysis of Anterolateral Thigh Flap and Pectoralis Major Myo-cutaneous Flap for Reconstruction of Post Excision Defects of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Present study is a comparative evaluation of the financial impact on choice of flap, clinical results as well as post resection quality of life assessment of cancer patients reconstructed with anterolateral thigh(ALT) flap and pectoralis major myo-cutaneous(PMMC) flap. Ethical clearance was obtained from institutional ethical committee. In this non-randomised, prospective study design among 49 oral squamous cell carcinoma cases, 39 cases were reconstructed using PMMC flap and 10 using ALT flap from year 2020 to 2022. These 2 flaps were compared in terms of parameters like time utilised for reconstruction, hospital stay, overall survival and Washington University Quality of Life index(UW-QOL) for head and neck cancer. Patients were followed regularly for post-operative complications. The University of Washington Quality of Life score (UW-QOL) questionnaire, version 4, was completed at six months post-operatively. Obtained data was statistically analysed using IBM® SPSSⓇ. Washington University Quality of Life index scores and esthetics are better with Antero-lateral thigh flap, with less overall post-operative complications. On the other hand Pectoralis myocutaneous flap has less surgical time and more salvage potential. Despite of Antero-lateral thigh flap having Good Washington University Quality of Life index scores, lesser post-operative complications and better esthetics; scale of developing nations is still tipping towards economical, less time consuming and less technique sensitive Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap.

Pectoral major myocutaneous flap in our practice: about 25 cases

The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) was described by Ariyan in 1979 for head and neck reconstructions. It is a safe flap, currently supplanted by free flaps in developed countries, but which remains very useful in developing countries. We report a series of 25 cases of PMMF reconstruction. All patients were treated for advanced stages of oral cavity cancer, where tumor excision left significant tissue loss. The reconstruction used PMMF, taken using the same technique. Supplanted by free flaps in developed countries, PMMF remains useful in developing countries. It is a flap that has numerous advantages (ease of collection, viability, low requirements in terms of instrumentation, etc.). Many variations have been described over the years.

Has the Pectoralis Major flap Really Become Obsolete?

Aim

To evaluate the current role of pectoralis major (PM) flap including the reasons for selecting it over free flaps.

Materials and methods

All patients who underwent PM flap at Apollo Hospitals Ahmedabad during the 3-year period from January 2020 to December 2022 were included. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics and complications were studied and reasons for selecting pectoralis major flap were analyzed. Data was entered in Microsoft excel spreadsheet and analyzed using online statistical calculators. The p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

57 patients underwent reconstruction with PM flap while 154 patients underwent free flap reconstruction. 54 were male and 3 were female. Median age was 51 years. PM flap was used for intraoral lining in 25 patients, and it was bilobed in 26 patients with full thickness cheek defect. Most common complication was wound infection seen in 10 patients. 5 patients developed marginal necrosis of the flap and 5 had donor site wound dehiscence. No complete flap loss was seen. During the same period, 15/154 (9.74%) patients with free flaps developed complete flap necrosis and this was statistically significant (p = 0.012). Reasons for choosing PM flap were also analyzed. 14 patients had major comorbidities, 18 had extensive disease, in 5 patients it was used for salvage post free flap failure, while 10 previously treated patients had unavailability of suitable vessels for anastomosis. 12 patients underwent PM flap due to financial constraints.

Conclusion

Thus, PM flap is not obsolete and continues to maintain its place in head and neck reconstruction.

Occipital Artery-Based Fascio-Cutaneous Pedicle Flap in Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects: A Saviour Under Challenging Times

Head and Neck cancer management has undergone many changes in the past few decades. Primarily advancements in reconstructive surgery for complex head and neck defects after extensive ablative surgeries. Many factors need to be considered in deciding the type of reconstruction. Any reconstruction is not without complications. We wish to present the reconstructive challenges we faced in recent times to reconstruct composite head and neck defects, situation where a salvage flap has to be chosen in a failed regional flap. An occipital artery-based pedicled fascio cutaneous flap is one such rescuer flap. It is a retrospective study of case records from January 2018 to January 2021 at our institute. Reviewed the clinical data of Cases in which occipital artery-based flap was used to reconstruct the composite head and neck defects. In the era of microvascular flap reconstruction, utilization of regional flaps is still a choice of reconstruction in the resource constraint setting. A less explored occipital artery-based flap is a reliable regional flap can be used in select cases with a good success.

PMMC flaps for reconstruction of oral defects in the age of microvascular flaps: A developing nation perspective

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMC) and Free flaps for reconstruction of post ablative defects in patients undergoing treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma and to understand the reasons for choosing each from a developing nation perspective.

Material and methods

In the present study, a retrospective study was conducted of the patients treated by either free flaps or PMMC flaps for reconstructive procedures over a five year period in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research.

Results

Out of 90 PMMC flaps, 44 patients (48.8%) had reconstruction due to lack of micro vascular facility at the center, in 39 patients (43.3%) due to financial constraints and in 7 patients (7%) due to associated comorbities. The overall complication rate in PMMC group was 30% as compared to 28% in Free Flap group. Total flap loss was seen in 3 flaps (2 microvascular and 1 PMMC) while marginal necrosis of skin paddle was seen in 12 patients (13%) in the PMMC group.

Conclusion

Though, the selection of PMMC flap over free flap was influenced by many factors, results of this study suggest that PMMC flap still has a major role in post-ablative defect reconstruction even in this era of free flaps, especially in developing countries like India.

Effect of Amniotic Membrane Nerve Wrapping in Final Results of Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Repair

BACKGROUND

Preventing perineural adhesions and scars formation in the traumatic peripheral injuries is very important on the recovery process. We aimed to evaluate the effect of using the amniotic membrane wrapping on the results of surgical treatment of damaged peripheral nerves.

METHODS

This cohort study included 30 patients with symptoms of acute peripheral nerve injuries due to penetrating trauma in the forearm or wrist in January 2019 to November 2020 referred to the Hand and Microsurgery Department, 15 Khordad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. In 15 patients, after nerve repair, amniotic membrane coverage was used around the nerve, all patients were followed for 12 months. Ultrasound study for neuroma formation and nerve regeneration was determined based on EMG and NCV findings. The modified Medical Research Councile classification (MRCC) was used to evaluate of motor and sensory recovery.

RESULTS

In the amniotic membrane wrapping group, all patients had nerve regeneration and functional nerve recovery occurred after 12 months. In the control group, 5 patients (33.4%) did not have nerve recovery and had functional and sensory impairment. In terms of functional capabilities; there was a significant difference in pinch strength, grip power and MRCC scoring between the two groups. Moreover, the mean volume of neuroma in these patients who used amniotic membrane covering was 2.7 mm³ and in the control group, it was 3.9 mm³ (P=0.001). Five patients who did not have a damaged nerve, the neuroma volume was 4.8 ± 0.9 mm³.

CONCLUSION

The use of amniotic membrane covering is effective methods in the improve results of peripheral nerve repair and nerve function recovery.

Head and Neck Reconstruction of the Vessel-Depleted Neck: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Damage of the vascular system secondary to radical neck dissection and/or radiotherapy or other treatments has a negative impact on microsurgical reconstruction. The search for adequate recipient vessels is hindered by the complexity of previous procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review of microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in the vessel-depleted neck was performed. The issues analyzed were indications for surgery, more frequently performed flaps, vascular systems used as recipient vessels, outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

The eligibility criteria were fulfilled by 57 studies published between September 1993 and January 2020. In 8235 patients, 8694 flaps were performed, 925 of which were for a vessel-depleted neck. The most commonly used flap was the anterolateral thigh flap, used in 195 cases (30%), followed by the radial forearm free flap, used in 157 cases (24%). The potential recipient vessels were numerous for arteries (26 options) and veins (31 options). For the 712 flaps with an identifiable recipient artery, the superficial temporal artery was the most commonly used vessel (n = 142, 20%). The superficial temporal vein was the most commonly used vessel for 639 flaps with an identifiable recipient vein (n = 118, 18.5%). Complications amounted to 11%; 80 out of 716 flaps in papers that reported them. Flap losses were reported in 2% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Major microsurgical head and neck reconstruction for postoncologic defects depends on appropriate recipient vessels. Vein availability is paramount. Understanding the complexity of this problem is useful for preoperative planning, precise decision-making, and an accurate surgical approach.

Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap-an Effective Reconstructive Option for Extensive Buccal Cancer Resection in Resource Constrained and Salvage Settings

Free flaps are the gold standard for reconstruction of extensive buccal cancer resections. However, salvage surgeries in previously operated and radiated necks, cost, increased operating time, and patient co-morbidities limit their routine use in high volume and resource-constrained settings. Pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap is the mainstay of reconstruction of large buccal defects. However, reconstruction becomes a challenge during salvage of recurrences where PMMC has been utilized in previous reconstruction and in female patients where PMMC harvest results in major donor site morbidity. A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 13 consecutive patients (eight male and five female) with through and through buccal cancer resection defects reconstructed using pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) flap from July 2018 to September 2019 was performed. The indications of using an LD flap were salvage surgeries for recurrences where PMMC was used in earlier reconstruction, medical co-morbidities, vessel depleted necks, and financial constraints precluding use of free flaps. The mean follow-up period was 9.84 months. The mean operating time post-resection was 2 h and 26 min. The mean hospital stay was 12.61 days. All patients could be decannulated successfully (mean duration 9.69 days) and 12 could be weaned off feeding tube. None of the patients had any major flap related or donor site complications. Pedicled LD flap has a limited but an effective reconstructive role for extensive buccal cancer ablation as an alternative to free flaps and PMMC in salvage and resource-constrained situations.

Colgajo de pectoral mayor para reconstrucción de defectos faríngeos. Descripción de un caso

Introducción: La fístula faringocutánea post-laringectomía total (LT) continúa siendo una complicación frecuente luego de esta intervención especialmente tras tratamiento radioterápico. Cuando fracasan las medidas conservadoras, es necesario recurrir a cirugía reconstructiva. En nuestro centro se utiliza el colgajo miocutáneo de pectoral mayor (CMPM), que asegura un flujo sanguíneo adecuado para el tratamiento fístulas post-irradiación. Descripción: Presentamos un paciente con una fístula faringocutánea tras LT que requirió una amplia reconstrucción mediante CMPM asimismo discutiremos el importante papel que juega el tratamiento con oxígeno hiperbárico en el manejo de las consecuencias post-radioterapia. Conclusión: En la era de la reconstrucción microvascular, el PMMC puede ser utilizado para la reconstrucción de grandes defectos de cabeza y cuello, consiguiendo una adecuada cobertura tras protocolos de preservación de órgano o pacientes con historia de enfermedad vascular.

Choice of Regional Flaps for Oral Cancer Defects: Relevance in Current Era

Introduction

Microvascular free flaps (MVFF) are the current standard of care for reconstruction of oral ablative defects; however, pedicled myocutaneous flaps (PMCF) are still used widely in India. The rationale behind the preference for selecting PMCF in the present era is not well understood. The associated complications and swallowing outcomes are variable.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed the records of patients who underwent reconstructive surgery for oral cancer ablative defects over a 3-year period.

Results

Ninety-seven pedicled myocutaneous flaps [89 pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flaps, eight lower trapezius island myocutaneous (TMC) flaps] and 113 MVFFs were performed. The reasons for selecting PMCF were financial constraints 38.7%, MVFF salvage 22.5%, medically compromised 10.7%, vessel-depleted neck 6.4%, old age with PS2 + 5.3%, early recurrence 5.3%, borderline resectable 4.3%, palliative resection 2.1%. Overall complication rate was 20.4%. Of patients, 50.7% and 34.7% were on regular and semisolid diet, respectively; 66.6% had acceptable swallowing-related social well-being.

Conclusion

PMCFs have an important role in developing countries with patients having financial constraints. The other potential reasons driven by patient factors were discussed. The swallowing outcomes are good, with majority of the people having socially acceptable swallowing function.

The Pectoralis Major Island Flap: Short Scar Modified Muscle-Sparing Harvesting Technique Improves Aesthetic Outcome in Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery

BACKGROUND

Pectoralis major flap reconstruction is often associated with large unappealing scars in head-neck surgery. We recently established an alternative harvesting technique that improves aesthetic outcome.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to demonstrate a modified surgical technique that harvests the pectoralis major muscle as an island flap and focuses on minimizing incision lines and applying a muscle-sparing approach.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis covering the period 2008-2018 was conducted. Patients who underwent pectoralis major island flap reconstruction for fistula prophylaxis after salvage laryngectomy at the Medical University of Innsbruck were included. Flap harvesting was performed subcutaneously using two small incision lines, thereby sparing the clavicular and upper sternocostal aspects of the pectoralis muscle.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (n = 19) or pharynx (n = 4) underwent salvage laryngectomy and consecutive reconstruction using a pectoralis major island flap and our muscle-sparing technique. Mean overall operation time was 147 ± 48.6 min. The majority (70%) of patients had an uneventful course of recovery and showed satisfying aesthetic results and low donor site morbidity as compared to traditional harvesting techniques. Six (26%) patients had major complications that required surgical revision. Three (13%) cases were complicated with fistulas.

CONCLUSION

The pectoralis major island flap is shown to be reliable in otolaryngeal surgery. This surgical technique minimizes scarring and preserves thoracic wall architecture by taking a less invasive approach, thereby improving aesthetic outcome and reducing overall patient morbidity.

The Use of Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneus and Deltopectoral Flaps in Oromandibular Defects Reconstruction

The main complication in patients with combined treatment of head, neck, mandibular and maxillary tumors is osteoradionecrosis, which appears after radiation therapy. Radiation therapy is widely used to treat cancer, but growing concern is related to the risk of osteoradionecrosis after treatment. This can occur after radiation therapy. Below, we would like to describe the treatment of osteoradionecrosis, which appeared 5 years after radiation therapy in a 54-year-old male patient. In 2012, a patient in Turkey was diagnosed with adenocystic carcinoma of the tongue base, and surgery was performed to remove the tumor after the patient underwent a course of radiotherapy. In 2016, the patient underwent again a surgery for tumor recurrence. In December 2017, the patient was admitted to our clinic with osteoradionecrosis. We performed segmental resection of the mandible, type I right-sided modified neck dissection, reconstruction of the mandible with a titanium plate and a pectoralis major muscle skin flap. The technique described in this case is the insertion of a well-vascularized tissue into the pre-irradiated and necrotic hypovascular region of the mandible with a skin-muscle flap of the pectoralis major muscle wrapped around the plate for reconstruction. As a result, a pectoralis major flap coverred the mouth floor on internal side and the outside skin defect was covered with a deltopectoral one. The viability of the skin-muscle flap of the pectoralis major muscle was assessed using clinical monitoring, checking the flap every four hours for the first 3 days. This study describes a successful outcome.

Sequential reconstruction for recurrent head and neck cancer: A 10-year experience

Background

Most patients with head and neck cancer successfully undergo oncologic resection followed by free or local flap reconstruction, depending on the tumor’s size and location. Despite effective curative resection and reconstruction, head and neck cancer patients still face a high risk of recurrence and the possibility of a second primary cancer. Moreover, surgeons hesitate to perform sequential reconstruction following curative resection for several reasons. Few large-scale studies on this subject are available. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the outcome of sequential head and neck reconstruction to determine the possible risks.

Methods

In total, 467 patients underwent head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection at our center from 2008 to 2017. Of these cases, we retrospectively reviewed the demographic and clinical features of 58 who had sequential head and neck reconstruction following resection of recurrent cancer.

Results

Our study included 43 males (74.1%) and 15 females (25.9%). The mean age at the initial operation was 55.4±15.3 years, while the mean age at the most recent operation was 59.0±14.3 years. The interval between the first and second operations was 49.2±62.4 months. Twelve patients (20.7%) underwent surgery on the tongue, and 12 (20.7%) had procedures on the oropharynx. Thirty-four patients (58.6%) received a sequential free flap reconstruction, and 24 patients (41.4%) were treated using locoregional flaps. No cases of flap failure occurred.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that patients who need additional operations with recurrent head and neck cancer could optimally benefit from sequential curative resections and reconstructions.

Effectiveness of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in the surgical management of oral cancer: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Over 80,000 oral cancer cases get diagnosed each year in India, majority undergoing extensive resections owing to their late presentation. Pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap is a pedicled axial pattern flap which is based on thoracoacromical artery. It is readily available as a viable alternative to free flap reconstruction, especially for the economically poor and malnourished patients. Its proximity to head and neck structures gives added advantage to reconstruct complex and large volume oral and maxillofacial defects. It provides a relatively good possibility of functional and aesthetic restoration providing both mucosal lining and skin cover.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of 29 PMMC flap reconstructions, conducted between 2013-2016. The reconstruction outcomes assessed in this study were divided into two categories namely "success" and "failure" based on certain functional parameters observed during follow-up of 1 year. The complications were broadly classified as major/minor and flap related/non-flap related. We assessed the feasibility of using a PMMC flap for reconstructing various subsites of oral cavity cancer. Further, the association of patient variables with complication rates and outcome of reconstruction were analysed.

RESULTS

Out of 29 patients overall complications were noted in 15 (51.7%) cases with a female preponderance. Flap-related complications were noted in 9 whereas non-flap-related complications were seen in 6 patients. Major and minor complications were noted in 2 (both flap related) and 13 cases respectively. Complete full thickness flap necrosis was not encountered in any patient. Patients with flap skin paddle size ≤ 36 cm² (n = 12) had significantly increased overall complication rates. Despite complications a high success rate (93.1%, n = 27) was achieved with this mode of reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

The PMMC flap reconstruction is a versatile, reliable and an affordable single staged procedure with a high success rate in terms of achieving treatment goals. Although it has moderately high complication rates, but PMMC flap proved to be a workhorse in locally advanced cases of head and neck cancer at the end of 1 year follow-up.

Breast Cancer in a Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Used for the Reconstruction of Tongue Cancer: A Case Report

Breast cancers are the most common cancers in women. However, breast cancer occurring in a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap is extremely rare. This article describes a case of breast cancer occurring in such a flap used for reconstruction of the tongue in a 72-year-old woman. Follow-up computed tomogram depicted a slowly growing mass in the flap. Thirty-nine months postoperatively, a fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimen taken from the lesion suggested glandular carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with breast cancer in the neck area of the flap and tumor excision was performed. Histologic examination of the excised tumor showed tumor cells arranged in cords, with tubular and cribriform carcinomas near the pectoral muscle with adipose tissue. The cytoplasm was abundant and eosinophilic. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma in the pectoralis major flap. Sequential radiotherapy was performed to the neck with a total radiation dose of 50 Gy. Furthermore, the patient received oral anastrozole 1 mg daily as systemic adjuvant therapy for the receptor-positive breast malignancy. One year after surgery, the patient was alive with no evidence of disease. Including this case, only 2 cases of breast cancer in a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap used for reconstruction in the head and neck region have been reported.

Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap for Head and Neck Defects in the Era of Free Flaps: Harvesting Technique and Indications

The role of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) in head and neck reconstruction is challenged recently due to its natural drawbacks and the popularity of free flaps. This study was designed to evaluate the indications and reliability of using a PMMF in the current free flap era based on a single center experience. The PMMF was harvested as a pedicle-skeletonized flap, with its skin paddle caudally and medially to the areola, including the third intercostal perforator, preserving the upper one third of the pectoralis major muscle. The harvested flap was passed via a submuscular tunnel over the clavicle. One hundred eighteen PMMFs were used in 114 patients, of which 76 were high-risk candidates for a free flap; 8 patients underwent total glossectomy, and 30 underwent salvage or emergency reconstruction. Major complications occurred in 4 patients and minor complications developed in 10. Tracheal extubation was possible in all cases, while oral intake was possible in all but 1 case. These techniques used in harvesting a PMMF significantly overcome its natural pitfalls. PMMFs can safely be used in head and neck cancer patients who need salvage reconstruction, who are high risk for free flaps, and who need large volume soft-tissue flaps.

Case Reports of Two Unusual Donor Site Complications of the Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap and Literature Review

The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF), once considered a workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction, is still used for a wide range of head and neck reconstruction in the era of microvascular free tissue transfer flap (MFTF) for many reasons including low donor site morbidity. Numerous studies have reported the flap-related complications of PMMF in depth but have seldom discussed the donor site complications in detail. This article reports 2 unusual donor site complications and reviews the published data on general donor site complications resulting from PMMF use.

Regional Myocutaneous Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: Experience of a Head and Neck Cancer Unit

Background:

Pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicle flap and other regional myocutaneous pedicle flaps (RMF), despite the superiority shown by free flaps, have remained relevant in the reconstruction of major head and neck oncologic defects. It has continued to find relevance as the preferred reconstruction of choice in some general head and neck reconstructive applications. While its role has been defined in developed environment, the same cannot be said for developing environment. The aim thus, was to review our experiences with RMFs in head and neck reconstructions, with a view to evaluating the indications and outcomes in a limited opportunity environment with some free flaps expertise.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study from records of RMF cases performed for head and neck reconstruction, at the study institution. Eligibility for study inclusion comprised case cohorts with advanced head and neck diseases requiring ablative surgery and reconstruction with pectoralis major flaps and other RMFs.

Results:

A total of 17 cases were treated with RMFs. 10 were pectoralis major flaps while 7 were other RMFs. The main indications were failed free flaps and financial constraints. No regional pedicle flap failure was recorded; however, complication rate was 35.5% (6/17).

Conclusion:

Pectoralis major flaps and other RMFs were very reliable option for head and neck reconstruction. Free flap failure and financial constraints were the main indications for RMF reconstruction indications in head and neck reconstruction in a developing environment with some free flap expertise.

Extended vertical lower trapezius island myocutaneous flap versus pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for reconstruction in recurrent oral and oropharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of an extended vertical lower trapezius island myocutaneous flap (TIMF) and a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF).

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with advanced recurrent oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) underwent salvage surgery followed by placement of either an extended lower vertical TIMF or PMMF for reconstruction. Twenty-one patients received extended lower vertical TIMFs, whereas 18 received PMMFs.

RESULTS

The pedicle length of the TIMF was longer than that of the PMMF, and the skin paddle of the TIMF was both wider and longer than the PMMF. No major complication developed in any of the patients. The TIMF group experienced a lower rate of minor flap failure than did the PMMF group.

CONCLUSION

Use of an extended vertical lower TIMF, which has a longer pedicle flap and a larger skin paddle than a PMMF, is optimal for reconstruction of major defects. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E159-E164, 2016.

[Renaissance of pedicled flaps in oral and maxillofacial surgery]

A retrospective analysis in the period 2007 to 2011 included 71 surgically treated patients for carcinoma of the head and neck region and subsequent reconstruction with 36 pedicled distant flaps and 47 free flaps. Patient specific parameters of data collection with SPSS 17.0 were age and sex distribution, TNM stage and treatment. The specific type of flap reconstruction, duration of surgery, complications, intensive care and inpatient treatment were recorded. The results showed that the healing process was uneventful in 26 (72.2 %) pedicled flaps, 14 (38.9 %) pedicled flaps were transplanted in a preoperatively irradiated area of the head and neck region and in 86.0 % with a positive healing process. Tumor stage, general physical condition of the patient and type of therapy are the key parameters for the choice of reconstruction.

Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap--still a workhorse for maxillofacial reconstruction in developing countries

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the utility of the pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap for head, face, and neck (HFN) reconstruction in the Indian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hospital records of 496 patients in whom the PMMC flap was used (saving the deltopectoral flap) for reconstruction of HFN defects from January 1991 to December 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. All the patients were followed up for a minimum period of 6 months, and the utility of the PMMC flap was evaluated for HFN reconstruction.

RESULTS

Of the 496 patients, complications developed in 84 patients. The complications included complete flap failure in 12, partial skin paddle loss in 24, wound infection in 12, peripheral wound dehiscence in 16, plate exposure in 12, and donor site morbidity such as infection and a decrease in function in 8.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMMC flap or its modification was used in 496 cases of reconstruction after resection surgery for malignancy of the HFN region with minimal morbidity and 1 death. This technique is a useful alternative in places with a high incidence of HFN malignancies and microsurgical free tissue transfer is not possible or as a salvage procedure in selected large, full-thickness, oral cavity lesions. In our 19-year experience, the final functional and cosmetic results were satisfactory with this sturdy flap.

Indications and outcomes for 100 patients managed with a pectoralis major flap within a UK maxillofacial unit

There are few studies reporting the role of the pedicled pectoralis major (PPM) flap in modern maxillofacial practice. The outcomes of 100 patients (102 flaps) managed between 1996 and 2012 in a UK maxillofacial unit that preferentially practices free tissue reconstruction are reported. The majority (88.2%) of PPM flaps were for oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), stage IV (75.6%) disease, and there was substantial co-morbidity (47.0% American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 or 4). The PPM flap was the preferred reconstruction on 80.4% of occasions; 19.6% followed free flap failure. Over half of the patients (57%) had previously undergone major surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy. Ischaemic heart disease (P=0.028), diabetes mellitus (P=0.040), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection (P=0.013) were independently associated with flap loss (any degree). Free flap failure was independently associated with total (2.0%) and major (6.9%) partial flap loss (P=0.044). Cancer-specific 5-year survival for stage IV primary SCC and salvage surgery improved in the second half (2005-2012) of the study period (22.2% vs. 79.8%, P=0.002, and 0% vs. 55.7%, P=0.064, respectively). There were also declines in recurrent disease (P=0.008), MRSA (P<0.001), and duration of admission (P=0.014). The PPM flap retains a valuable role in the management of advanced disease combined with substantial co-morbidity, and following free flap failure.