1
|
Ruf P, Orassi V, Fischer H, Steffen C, Kreutzer K, Duda GN, Heiland M, Checa S, Rendenbach C. Biomechanical evaluation of CAD/CAM magnesium miniplates as a fixation strategy for the treatment of segmental mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap. Comput Biol Med 2024; 168:107817. [PMID: 38064852 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Titanium patient-specific (CAD/CAM) plates are frequently used in mandibular reconstruction. However, titanium is a very stiff, non-degradable material which also induces artifacts in the imaging. Although magnesium has been proposed as a potential material alternative, the biomechanical conditions in the reconstructed mandible under magnesium CAD/CAM plate fixation are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the primary fixation stability and potential of magnesium CAD/CAM miniplates. The biomechanical environment in a one segmental mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap induced by a combination of a short posterior titanium CAD/CAM reconstruction plate and two anterior CAD/CAM miniplates of titanium and/or magnesium was evaluated, using computer modeling approaches. Output parameters were the strains in the healing regions and the stresses in the plates. Mechanical strains increased locally under magnesium fixation. Two plate-protective constellations for magnesium plates were identified: (1) pairing one magnesium miniplate with a parallel titanium miniplate and (2) pairing anterior magnesium miniplates with a posterior titanium reconstruction plate. Due to their degradability and reduced stiffness in comparison to titanium, magnesium plates could be beneficial for bone healing. Magnesium miniplates can be paired with titanium plates to ensure a non-occurrence of plate failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Ruf
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Orassi
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Heilwig Fischer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Claudius Steffen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Kilian Kreutzer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Georg N Duda
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Sara Checa
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
| | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kreutzer K, Lampert P, Doll C, Voss JO, Koerdt S, Heiland M, Steffen C, Rendenbach C. Patient-specific 3D-printed mini-versus reconstruction plates for free flap fixation at the mandible: Retrospective study of clinical outcomes and complication rates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2023; 51:621-628. [PMID: 37852889 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complication rates of patient-specific 3D-printed mini- and reconstruction plates for free flap fixation in mandibular reconstruction. A retrospective monocentric study was carried out between April 2017 and December 2021 to analyze patients undergoing immediate mandibular reconstruction using fibula free flaps and osteosynthesis using patient-specific 3D-printed implants. Eighty-three patients with a mean age of 63.6 years were included. The mean follow-up period was 18.5 months. Patient-specific 3D-printed plates were designed as reconstruction plates (38 patients), miniplates (21 patients) or a combination of reconstruction- and miniplates (24 patients). With miniplates, plate removal was performed significantly more often via an intraoral approach (p < 0.001) and in an outpatient setting (p = 0.002). Univariate analysis showed a higher fistula rate with reconstruction plates (p = 0.037). Multivariate analysis showed no significant differences in complications. Case-control matching demonstrated significantly lower rates of fistula (p = 0.017) and non-union (p = 0.029) in the combined group. This retrospective study shows a tendency towards reduced complication rates with patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates in comparison to patient-specific 3D-printed reconstruction plates for immediate mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian Kreutzer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Lampert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Doll
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan O Voss
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Koerdt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudius Steffen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wüster J, Hesse B, Rothweiler R, Bortel E, Gross C, Bakhtiyari S, King A, Boller E, Gerber J, Rendenbach C, Fretwurst T, Preissner S, Heiland M, Nelson K, Nahles S. Comparison of the 3D-microstructure of human alveolar and fibula bone in microvascular autologous bone transplantation: a synchrotron radiation μ-CT study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1169385. [PMID: 37691907 PMCID: PMC10486015 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1169385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Autologous bone transplantation is successfully used in reconstructive surgery of large/critical-sized bone defects, whereby the microvascular free fibula flap is still regarded as the gold standard for the reconstruction of such defects in the head and neck region. Here, we report the morphological and lacunar properties of patient-paired bone samples from eight patients from the jaw (AB; recipient site) and the fibula (FB; donor site) on the micron length-scale using Synchrotron µ-CT. Insights into differences and similarities between these bone structures could offer a better understanding of the underlying mechanism for successful surgical outcomes and might clear the path for optimized, nature-inspired bone scaffold designs. Methods: Spatial vessel-pore arrangements, bone morphology, fluid-simulation derived permeability tensor, osteocyte lacunar density, and lacunar morphology are compared. Results: The orientation of the vessel system indicates a homogenous vessel orientation for AB and FB. The average mineral distance (50%) to the closest vessel boundary is higher in AB than in FB (the mean is 96 μm for AB vs. 76 μm for FB; p = 0.021). Average osteocyte lacunar density is found to be higher in AB than in FB (mean 22,874 mm3 vs. 19,376 mm3 for FB; p = 0.038), which might compensate for the high distance from the mineral to the nearest vessel. No significant differences in lacunar volume are found between paired AB and FB. Discussion: A comparable vessel network and similar distribution of vessel porosity between AB and FB may allow the FB graft to exhibit a high regeneration potential when connected to AB, and this might correlate with a high osteoinductive and osteoconductive potential of FB when connected to AB. Since widely used and potent synthetic bone grafts exist, new insight into the bone structure of well-established autologous bone grafts, such as the free fibula flap, could help to improve the performance of such materials and therefore the design of 3D scaffolds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Wüster
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hesse
- Xploraytion GmbH, Berlin, Germany
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France
| | - Rene Rothweiler
- Department of Oral- and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Christian Gross
- Department of Oral- and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Elodie Boller
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Fretwurst
- Department of Oral- and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Saskia Preissner
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katja Nelson
- Department of Oral- and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Nahles
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee ZH, Ismail T, Shuck JW, Chang EI. Innovative Strategies in Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1194. [PMID: 37512006 PMCID: PMC10384542 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
The field of reconstructive microsurgery has witnessed considerable advancements over the years, driven by improvements in technology, imaging, surgical instruments, increased understanding of perforator anatomy, and experience with microsurgery. However, within the subset of microvascular head and neck reconstruction, novel strategies are needed to improve and optimize both patient aesthetics and post-operative function. Given the disfiguring defects that are encountered following trauma or oncologic resections, the reconstructive microsurgeon must always aim to innovate new approaches, reject historic premises, and challenge established paradigms to further achieve improvement in both aesthetic and functional outcomes. The authors aim to provide an up-to-date review of innovations in head and neck reconstruction for oncologic defects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z-Hye Lee
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tarek Ismail
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - John W Shuck
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Edward I Chang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weitz J, Grabenhorst A, Singer H, Niu M, Grill FD, Kamreh D, Claßen CAS, Wolff KD, Ritschl LM. Mandibular reconstructions with free fibula flap using standardized partially adjustable cutting guides or CAD/CAM technique: a three- and two-dimensional comparison. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1167071. [PMID: 37228490 PMCID: PMC10203950 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mandibular reconstruction with the fibula free flap (FFF) is performed freehand, CAD/CAM-assisted, or by using partially adjustable resection/reconstruction aids. The two latter options represent the contemporary reconstructive solutions of the recent decade. The purpose of this study was to compare both auxiliary techniques with regard to feasibility, accuracy, and operative parameters. Methods and materials The first twenty consecutively operated patients requiring a mandibular reconstruction (within angle-to-angle) with the FFF using the partially adjustable resection aids between January 2017 and December 2019 at our department were included. Additionally, matching CAD/CAM FFF cases were used as control group in this cross-sectional study. Medical records and general information (sex, age, indication for surgery, extent of resection, number of segments, duration of surgery, and ischemia time) were analyzed. In addition, the pre- and postoperative Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data of the mandibles were converted to standard tessellation language (.stl) files. Conventional measurements - six horizontal distances (A-F) and temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) spaces - and the root mean square error (RMSE) for three-dimensional analysis were measured and calculated. Results In total, 40 patients were enrolled (20:20). Overall operation time, ischemia time, and the interval between ischemia time start until end of operation showed no significant differences. No significant difference between the two groups were revealed in conventional measurements of distances (A-D) and TMJ spaces. The Δ differences for the distance F (between the mandibular foramina) and the right medial joint space were significantly lower in the ReconGuide group. The RMSE analysis of the two groups showed no significant difference (p=0.925), with an overall median RMSE of 3.1 mm (2.2-3.7) in the CAD/CAM and 2.9 mm (2.2-3.8) in the ReconGuide groups. Conclusions The reconstructive surgeon can achieve comparable postoperative results regardless of technique, which may favor the ReconGuide use in mandibular angle-to-angle reconstruction over the CAD/CAM technique because of less preoperative planning time and lower costs per case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Weitz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Josefinum, Augsburg and Private Practice Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery im Pferseepark, Augsburg, Germany
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alex Grabenhorst
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hannes Singer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Minli Niu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian D. Grill
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Kamreh
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolina A. S. Claßen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Saarland, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Klaus-Dietrich Wolff
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucas M. Ritschl
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hagmann A, Schappacher R, Pietzka S, Sakkas A, Scheurer M, Schramm A, Wilde F, Ebeling M. Comparison of Laser-Sintered and Milled Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plates for Complications and Outcomes in Mandibular Defects-Comparative Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040648. [PMID: 37109034 PMCID: PMC10142247 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
CAD/CAM-manufactured implants are increasingly becoming the standard in current therapy. The question of whether the manufacturing-related rougher surface of selective laser fusion plates compared to milled, smoother reconstruction plates leads to increased postoperative complications such as infections, plate exposure, and fistulas has not yet been determined. A retrospective analysis of 98 patients who underwent surgical treatment with either a selective laser fusion plate or a milled reconstruction plate at our hospital was performed. The only significant predictors of the revision risk were the operation time and use of antiresorptive medication. In the KLS Martin® group, the risk of revision decreased by approximately 20% for each additional hour by which the operation time was increased (OR = 0.81). In the Depuy Synthes® group, the risk of revision increased by approximately 11% with each additional hour of operative time (OR = 0.81 × 1.37 = 1.11). Both groups showed no significant differences in the number of necessary revision surgeries as well as inpatient complications. In summary, we can say that the assumption that additively manufactured reconstruction plates have a rougher surface due to selective laser melting and thus make plaque accumulation and revisions more likely has not been confirmed. Overall, it seems imperative to select further studies regarding the clinical outcome depending on the selected plate system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hagmann
- Medical School, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Robert Schappacher
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Marienhospital, Böheimstraße 37, 70199 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Sebastian Pietzka
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 10, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Sakkas
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 10, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Mario Scheurer
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Alexander Schramm
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 10, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Frank Wilde
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 10, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Marcel Ebeling
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023; 140:105742. [PMID: 36857975 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates for free flap fixation in mandibular reconstruction were recently associated with enhanced osseous union. Higher mechanical strains resulting from these plates are discussed as reasons, but biomechanical studies are missing. This study aims to examine, whether patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates provide an increased interosteotomy movement (IOM) and lower stiffness compared with reconstruction plates. METHODS Polyurethane (PU) mandible and fibula models (Synbone AG, Malans, Schweiz) were used to simulate mandibular reconstruction with a one segment fibula flap equivalent. Osteosynthesis was performed using either four patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates (3D-Mini) or one patient-specific 3D-printed reconstruction plate (3D-Recon). Mastication was simulated using cyclic dynamic loading with increasing loads until material failure or a maximum load of 1000 N. Continuous IOM recording was carried out using a 3D optical tracking system (ARAMIS, Carl Zeiss GOM Metrology, Braunschweig, Germany). FINDINGS The averaged stiffness at a load of 100-300 N load did not differ between the groups (p = 0.296). There was a faster 1.0 mm vertical displacement in the 3D-Mini group (26 376 ± 14 190 cycles versus 44 817 ± 30 430 cycles, p = 0.018). The IOM were higher with miniplate fixation in the distal gap (p = 0.040). In the mesial gap, there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.160). INTERPRETATION Fixation with patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates results in higher mechanical strains. Lower rates of pseudarthrosis, as seen in clinical studies, might be caused by this phenomenon. Surgeons should evaluate the primary use of 3D-printed miniplates in mandibular reconstruction due to advantages of intraoral plate removal alongside safe osteosynthesis.
Collapse
|
8
|
Steffen C, Duda K, Wulsten D, Voss JO, Koerdt S, Nahles S, Heiland M, Checa S, Rendenbach C. Clinical and Technical Validation of Novel Bite Force Measuring Device for Functional Analysis after Mandibular Reconstruction. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040586. [PMID: 36832074 PMCID: PMC9955263 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Bite force measuring devices that are generally suitable for edentulous patients or patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction are missing. This study assesses the validity of a new bite force measuring device (prototype of loadpad®, novel GmbH) and evaluates its feasibility in patients after segmental mandibular resection. Accuracy and reproducibility were analyzed with two different protocols using a universal testing machine (Z010 AllroundLine, Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany). Four groups were tested to evaluate the impact of silicone layers around the sensor: no silicone ("pure"), 2.0 mm soft silicone ("2-soft"), 7.0 mm soft silicone ("7-soft") and 2.0 mm hard silicone ("2-hard"). Thereafter, the device was tested in 10 patients prospectively who underwent mandibular reconstruction using a fibula free flap. Average relative deviations of the measured force in relation to the applied load reached 0.77% ("7-soft") to 5.28% ("2-hard"). Repeated measurements in "2-soft" revealed a mean relative deviation of 2.5% until an applied load of 600 N. Maximum bite force decreased postoperatively by 51.8% to a maximum mean bite force of 131.5 N. The novel device guarantees a high accuracy and degree of reproducibility. Furthermore, it offers new opportunities to quantify perioperative oral function after reconstructive surgery of the mandible also in edentulous patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudius Steffen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-655083; Fax: +49-30-450-555901
| | - Katharina Duda
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dag Wulsten
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan O. Voss
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Koerdt
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Nahles
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sara Checa
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Qayyum Z, Khan ZA, Maqsood A, Prabhu N, Saad Alqarni M, Bader AK, Issrani R, Abbasi MS, Ahmed N, Sghaireen MG, Heboyan A. Outcome Assessment after Reconstruction of Tumor-Related Mandibular Defects Using Free Vascularized Fibular Flap-A Clinical Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11020193. [PMID: 36673561 PMCID: PMC9859578 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11020193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes of the free vascularized fibular flap in the reconstruction of mandibular defects, and to assess the oral health impact profile of these patients before surgery and after oral rehabilitation. Patients requiring reconstruction of defects greater than 6 cm were selected for this study. The defect size and type, the size of the required skin paddle, the need for second flaps, the intraoperative complications, and the type of closure were documented. Patients were evaluated postoperatively for function, aesthetics, and donor- or reconstruction-site complications. The validated oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) questionnaires were filled before and after surgery and after dental rehabilitation. This study included 11 cases of squamous-cell carcinomas, 2 cases of malignant nerve sheath tumors, and 1 case each of malignant melanoma, ameloblastoma, giant-cell tumor, osteosarcoma, and chondrosarcoma. The analysis revealed a significant association (p = 0.030) of gender with free vascular flap complications, while no significant association (p > 0.05) was found when donor- and recipient- site complications, as well as the type of resection (Brown’s classification), were compared with free vascular flaps. Moreover, the total OHIP-14 scores for patients before surgery, after surgery, and after dental rehabilitation were 12.03 ± 1.34, 10.66 ± 1.41, and 08.33 ± 0.62, respectively. The oral health-related quality of life was markedly improved after the reconstruction of the mandibular defects with free vascularized fibular flap and dental rehabilitation. The overall success rate of fibular flap in our study was 72.2%, which is lower than that reported in the literature. This may be attributed to the fact that almost all of our cases included large segmental defects that extended across the midline of the mandible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahid Qayyum
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Khyber Girls Medical College, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar 23301, Pakistan
| | - Zafar Ali Khan
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Afsheen Maqsood
- Department of Oral Pathology, Bahria University Dental College, Karachi 75530, Pakistan
| | - Namdeo Prabhu
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Saad Alqarni
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alzarea K. Bader
- Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rakhi Issrani
- Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maria Shakoor Abbasi
- Department of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, Pakistan
| | - Naseer Ahmed
- Department of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, Pakistan
- Correspondence: (N.A.); (A.H.)
| | - Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen
- Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Artak Heboyan
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
- Correspondence: (N.A.); (A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Knitschke M, Yonan M, Roller FC, Pons-Kühnemann J, Attia S, Howaldt HP, Streckbein P, Böttger S. Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235774. [PMID: 36497255 PMCID: PMC9738514 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This is a monocentric, retrospective study of patients who underwent successful immediate or delayed maxilla or mandible reconstructions with FFF from January 2005 to December 2021. Panoramic radiograph, computed tomography scans, and cone-beam CTs were analyzed concerning the osseous union of the intersegmental junctions between maxillary or mandibular native jaw and fibular bone. The primary parameter was to estimate the status of osseous union according to osteosynthesis type. A total number of 133 patients (PSI: n = 64, non-PSI: n = 69) were included in the present study. The mean age was 56.7 ± 14.0 (Range: 14.7−82.7); the primary diagnosis was in 105 patients a malignant (78.9%) and in 20 patients a benign (15.0%) tumor. Mandible reconstruction was performed on 103 patients (77.4%), and on 30 patients (22.6%), maxilla reconstruction was performed. The radiographic images provided a rate of incomplete osseous union (IOU) of about 90% in both groups in the first 6 months. Imaging between 6 and 12 months reveals an IOU rate in the non-PSI group of 46.3% vs. 52.5% in the PSI group, between 12 and 24 months, an IOU rate of 19.6% vs. 26.1%, between 24 and 36 months 8.9% vs. 21.7%, and after 36 months the IOU rate decreases to 4.2% vs. 18.2%. Multivariate logistic regression shows that only osteosynthesis type (OR = 3.518 [95%-CI = 1.223−10.124], p = 0.02) and adjuvant radiotherapy (OR = 4.804 [95%-CI = 1.602−14.409], p = 0.005) are independent risk factors for incomplete osseous union. Cox regression revealed that the variables plate-system (Hazard ratio, HR = 5.014; 95 %-CI: 1.826−3.769; p = 0.002) and adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 5.710; 95 %-CI: 2.066−15.787; p < 0.001) are predictors for incomplete osseous union. In our study, the rate of incomplete bony fusion was significantly higher in the PSI group. Jaw-to-fibula apposition zones were significantly more affected than intersegmental zones. In multivariate analysis, a combination of osteosynthesis with PSI and adjuvant radiotherapy could be identified as a risk constellation for incomplete ossification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Knitschke
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Magdalena Yonan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Fritz Christian Roller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Pediatric Radiology, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Jörn Pons-Kühnemann
- Medical Statistics, Institute of Medical Informatics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Sameh Attia
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Howaldt
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Philipp Streckbein
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Böttger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ruf P, Orassi V, Fischer H, Steffen C, Duda GN, Heiland M, Kreutzer K, Checa S, Rendenbach C. Towards mechanobiologically optimized mandible reconstruction: CAD/CAM miniplates vs. reconstruction plates for fibula free flap fixation: A finite element study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:1005022. [PMID: 36466355 PMCID: PMC9712730 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to their advantages in applicability, patient-specific (CAD/CAM) reconstruction plates are increasingly used in fibula free flap mandible reconstruction. In addition, recently, CAD/CAM miniplates, with further advantages in postoperative management, have been introduced. However, biomechanical conditions induced by CAD/CAM systems remain partially unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the primary fixation stability of CAD/CAM fixators. For a patient-specific scenario, the biomechanical conditions induced in a one segmental fibula free flap stabilized using either a CAD/CAM reconstruction plate or CAD/CAM miniplates were determined using finite element analysis. The main output parameters were the strains between intersegmental bone surfaces and stresses in the fixation systems due to different biting scenarios. CAD/CAM miniplates resulted in higher mechanical strains in the mesial interosseous gap, whereas CAD/CAM reconstruction plate fixation resulted in higher strains in the distal interosseous gap. For all investigated fixation systems, stresses in the fixation systems were below the material yield stress and thus material failure would not be expected. While the use of CAD/CAM miniplates resulted in strain values considered adequate to promote bone healing in the mesial interosseous gap, in the distal interosseous gap CAD/CAM reconstruction plate fixation might result in more beneficial tissue straining. A mechanical failure of the fixation systems would not be expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Ruf
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Orassi
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heilwig Fischer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudius Steffen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg N. Duda
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kilian Kreutzer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sara Checa
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steffen C, Fischer H, Sauerbrey M, Heintzelmann T, Voss JO, Koerdt S, Checa S, Kreutzer K, Heiland M, Rendenbach C. Increased rate of pseudarthrosis in the anterior intersegmental gap after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps: a volumetric analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2022; 51:20220131. [PMID: 35762353 PMCID: PMC9522980 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20220131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pseudarthrosis after mandibular reconstruction leads to chronic overload of the osteosynthesis and impedes dental rehabilitation. This study evaluates the impact of gap site on osseous union in mandible reconstruction using a new volumetric analysis method with repeated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS The degree of bone regeneration was evaluated in 16 patients after mandible reconstruction with a fibula free flap and patient-specific reconstruction plates. Percentual bone volume and width changes in intersegmental gaps were retrospectively analyzed using a baseline CBCT in comparison to a follow-up CBCT. Patients' characteristics, plate-related complications, and gap sites (anterior/posterior) were analyzed. Detailed assessments of both gap sites (buccal/lingual/superior/inferior) were additionally performed. RESULTS Intersegmental gap width (p = 0.002) and site (p < 0.001) significantly influence bone volume change over two consecutive CBCTs. An initial larger gap width resulted in a lower bone volume change. In addition, anterior gaps showed significantly less bone volume changes. Initial gap width was larger at posterior segmental gaps (2.97 vs 1.65 mm, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS A methodology framework has been developed that allows to quantify pseuarthrosis in reconstructed mandibles using CBCT imaging. The study identifies the anterior segmental gap as a further risk factor for pseudarthrosis in reconstructions with CAD/CAM reconstruction plates. Future research should evaluate whether this outcome is related to the biomechanics induced at this site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudius Steffen
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heilwig Fischer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marius Sauerbrey
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thelma Heintzelmann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Oliver Voss
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Koerdt
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sara Checa
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kilian Kreutzer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3375-3392. [PMID: 35621664 PMCID: PMC9139377 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this monocentric, retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the status of osseous union in uni- and poly-segmental mandible reconstructions regarding conventional angle-stable manually bent osteosynthesis plates (Unilock 2.0 mm) versus titan laser-melted PSI patient-specific implant’s (PSI). The clinical impact of PSI’s high stiffness fixation methods on bone healing and regeneration is still not well addressed. The special interest was in evaluating the ossification of junctions between mandible and fibula and between osteotomized fibula free flap (FFF) segments. Panoramic radiograph (OPT), computed tomography (CT) scans, or cone-beam CTs (CBCT) of patients who underwent successful FFF for mandible reconstruction from January 2005 to December 2020 were analyzed. A total number of 89 cases (28 females (31.5%), 61 males (68.5%), mean age 58.2 ± 11.3 years, range: 22.8–82.7 years) fulfilled the chosen inclusion criteria for analysis (conventional: n = 44 vs. PSI: n = 45). The present study found an overall incomplete ossification (IOU) rate of 24.7% (conventional: 13.6% vs. PSI: 35.6%; p = 0.017) for mandible to fibula and intersegmental junctions. Between osteotomized FFF segments, an IOU rate of 16% was found in the PSI-group, while no IOU was recorded in the conventional group (p = 0.015). Significant differences were registered for IOU rates in poly-segmental (p = 0.041), and lateral (p = 0.016) mandibular reconstructions when PSI was used. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified plate exposure and type of plate used as independent risk factors for IOU. Previous or adjuvant radiotherapy did not impact incomplete osseous union in the evaluated study sample. PSI is more rigid than bent mini-plates and shields functional mechanical stimuli, and is the main reason for increasing the rate of incomplete ossification. To enhance the functional stimulus for ossification it has to be discussed if patient-specific implants can be designed to be thinner, and should be divided into segmental plates. This directs chewing forces through the bone and improves physiological bone remodeling.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kreutzer K, Steffen C, Koerdt S, Doll C, Ebker T, Nahles S, Flügge T, Heiland M, Beck-Broichsitter B, Rendenbach C. Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Miniplates for Free Flap Fixation at the Mandible: A Feasibility Study. Front Surg 2022; 9:778371. [PMID: 35372463 PMCID: PMC8967138 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.778371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, clinical outcomes, and accuracy of patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates for mandible reconstruction with fibula free flaps. Methods A feasibility study was conducted with 8 patients. Following virtual planning, patient-specific 1.0 mm titanium non-locking miniplates were produced via laser selective melting. 3D-printed cutting and drilling guides were used for segmental mandible resection and flap harvesting. Flap fixation was performed with two 4-hole miniplates and 2.0 mm non-locking screws (screw length 7 mm) for each intersegmental gap. Clinical follow-up was at least 6 months. Preoperative and postoperative CT/cone beam CT data were used for 3D accuracy analysis and evaluation of bone healing. Plate-related complications were monitored clinically. Results Patient-specific miniplate fixation of all flaps was successfully conducted (4 mono-segmental, 4 dual-segmental) with high accuracy (3.64 ± 1.18 mm) between the virtual plan and postoperative result. No technical complications were encountered intraoperatively. Osseous union occurred in all intersegmental gaps (1 partial, 18 complete) after 10 ± 2 months. No material fracture, dislocation, or plate exposure was observed. Conclusions Based on this pilot observational study including a limited number of patients, free flap fixation for mandibular reconstruction with patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates is feasible and associated with high accuracy, bone healing, and remote soft tissue complications.
Collapse
|